Dual-comb spectroscopy is emerging as an appealing application of mid-infrared frequency combs for high-resolution molecular spectroscopy, as it leverages on the unique coherence properties of frequency combs. Here, we present an on-chip dual-comb source based on mid-infrared quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Control of the combs repetition and offset frequencies is obtained by integrating micro-heaters next to each laser. We show that a full control of the dual-comb system is possible, by measuring a multi-heterodyne beating corresponding to an optical bandwidth of 32 cm−1 centered at 1330 cm−1 (7.52 μm), demonstrating that this device represents a critical step towards compact dual-comb systems.

Optical sensing by means of frequency combs1 is seen as an attractive spectroscopy tool as it combines high accuracy and precision together with a wide spectral coverage.2 Dual-comb spectroscopy3–6 is emerging as an attractive spectroscopy technique based on frequency combs, as all the comb spectrum can be acquired in very short time scales without requiring any moving parts.

Although first demonstrated in the mid-infrared (MIR) part of the spectrum, dual-comb spectroscopy has been extensively developed in the near-infrared spectral region,5–7 as frequency combs are mature sources in this region. Extending this technique to the MIR range,8 where the fundamental roto-vibrational transitions of most gas molecules are present, will allow to achieve dual-comb spectroscopy measurements with accuracies and precisions never achieved.9–11 

Nonetheless, optical sources capable of generating MIR frequency combs are extremely complex,8,12–15 and dual-comb spectroscopy on the MIR range is only possible in highly equipped laboratories.10,11 Instead, a compact dual-comb spectrometer in the MIR range could bring broadband high-precision measurements to practical applications such as trace gas or breath analysis.

Quantum Cascade Lasers (QCLs)16 are semiconductor lasers capable of generating frequency combs in the MIR and Terahertz parts of the spectrum.17–20 As the comb formation takes place directly in the QCL active region, QCL frequency combs (QCL-combs) offer the unique possibility of a completely integrated chip-based system capable of performing broadband high-resolution spectroscopy. In the meantime, a theoretical description of the comb formation has already been developed,21,22 dispersion compensation of QCL-combs was investigated,18,23 and dual-comb spectroscopy using QCL-combs has been demonstrated.24 In this letter, we demonstrate an on-chip dual-comb source based on MIR QCL-combs. We show that control of offset and repetition frequencies of both combs is possible by integrating micro-heaters25 close to the QCL-comb sources, demonstrating that this device is ideal for compact dual-comb spectroscopy systems.

An optical frequency comb is a coherent source whose spectrum consists of a set of equally spaced modes.1 Each comb mode fn can therefore be expressed as

fn=fceo+nfrep,
(1)

where frep is the repetition frequency and corresponds to the spacing between the modes, and n is an integer number. The offset frequency fceo corresponds to a common offset shared between all modes.

Dual-comb spectroscopy is based on the generation of a multi-heterodyne beating between two frequency combs with slightly different repetition frequencies (frep,1 and frep,2=frep,1+Δfrep, respectively, where Δfrep is the difference in repetition frequencies) on a fast detector. Each beatnote contains information regarding the sample absorption at a different optical frequency. Therefore, the full control of both offset and repetition frequencies is necessary when designing a device for dual-comb spectroscopy applications.

Our concept consists of two QCL-comb sources fabricated on a single chip, into which two independent micro-heaters25 are integrated next to each QCL. A schematic representation of a QCL-comb source together with its micro-heater is shown in Fig. 1(a). The QCL-comb sources used in this study are based on a modified version of an InGaAs/InAlAs broadband QCL design previously reported.17 The micro-heater consists of a small resistor created by etching a thin layer of Si-doped InP, previously utilized for achieving spectral tuning of single frequency QCLs.25 The QCL-comb source and the micro-heater are biased by two independent current sources, as shown schematically in Fig. 1(d). The source driving the QCL is used not only for achieving laser action but also for controlling the offset and repetition frequencies of the QCL-comb. In addition, the source driving the micro-heater controls the amount of heat that it generates and can also be used for controlling the comb parameters. More precisely, the repetition frequency frep depends on the group index ng, whereas the offset frequency fceo depends on the relative difference between the group index ng and the effective refractive index neff. Both ng and neff can be modified by using the temperature tuning of the refractive index. The temperature is controlled directly by the micro-heater or indirectly by the heat created by ohmic losses due to the current in the active region. In addition, the laser current can also modify the voltage of the structure and therefore its transition energies. The current has thus a direct effect on the gain of the structure and, as a consequence of the Kramers-Kronig relations, an effect on both ng and neff. Through their control of ng and neff, current and temperature do not act in the same manner on frep and fceo. In our system, the current of the microheater has only an effect on the temperature, whereas the current of the laser induces the two effects previously described.

FIG. 1.

On-chip dual-comb based on QCL-combs. (a) Schematic representation of the chip containing a QCL-comb source and a micro-heater. (b) Scanning electron micrograph showing the front view of the device containing two QCL-comb sources together with two micro-heaters. (c) Optical characterization setup used for characterization of the comb optical spectra, the multi-heterodyne beating between the two combs as well as the characterization of the RF beatnote. BS: beam-splitter. (d) Electrical circuit of an on-chip dual-comb. The isolation resistor can be made with high values (∼MΩ) in order to isolate the lasers.

FIG. 1.

On-chip dual-comb based on QCL-combs. (a) Schematic representation of the chip containing a QCL-comb source and a micro-heater. (b) Scanning electron micrograph showing the front view of the device containing two QCL-comb sources together with two micro-heaters. (c) Optical characterization setup used for characterization of the comb optical spectra, the multi-heterodyne beating between the two combs as well as the characterization of the RF beatnote. BS: beam-splitter. (d) Electrical circuit of an on-chip dual-comb. The isolation resistor can be made with high values (∼MΩ) in order to isolate the lasers.

Close modal

Fig. 1(b) shows a scanning electron microscopy image of the fabricated device containing two QCL-comb sources and two micro-heaters. The lasers are separated by 200 μm and can be electrically isolated by a deep etched section done between the two lasers.

For optical characterisation of this system, the dual-comb source is collimated by a single high-numerical aperture (0.86) aspheric lens, as shown in Fig. 1(c). Both beams are first spatially separated and then combined in a 50/50 beam-splitter, giving access to two versions of the superposition between the two beams. The first is sent to a fast detector (HgCdTe, 250 MHz 3 dB cut-off bandwidth) in order to measure the multi-heterodyne beating between the two combs. The second is sent to a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR, 0.12 cm−1 resolution) for acquisition of the optical spectra. The optical spectrum of each comb can be acquired independently by blocking one of the beams. For technical reasons, both lasers are driven in parallel by using a single low noise current source (Wavelength electronics QCL2000 LAB) with a specified average current noise density of 2nA/Hz. Also, the micro-heater is driven by using a low noise current driver source (Wavelength electronics QCL1000 OEM) with the same noise characteristics.

Fig. 2 shows the typical performance of an on-chip dual-comb source based on MIR QCL-combs. A 3 mm long device coated with a high-reflection coating on the back-facet operates at room-temperature emitting >100 mW of output power in CW operation (c.f. Fig. 2(a)). As the devices are driven in parallel, the current represents the total current circulating in both lasers. Also, the output power is the total output power of the two combs. The optical power characteristics of the individual devices were also characterized, showing similar performances for each device, with a ratio between the output power of each device P1/P2 = 0.83. The optical spectra of both devices (cf. Fig. 2(b)) are centered at 1330 cm−1 with 50cm1 of optical bandwidth. No micro-heater is used in this case. A zoom on the optical spectra shows that the offset frequencies of the two QCL-combs are significantly different when no micro-heater is used (Δfceo7GHz in this case). The origin of this offset frequency difference Δfceo lies on the precision of the lithography step used to define the laser ridges. Achieving devices with nearly identical offset frequencies (Δfceo<1MHz) represents a strong requirement in terms of precision of the laser width. A high value for Δfceo represents an important technological drawback for dual-comb systems, as the multi-heterodyne beating would be observed at very high frequencies (Δfceo7GHz here), requiring high-bandwidth detectors.

FIG. 2.

Characterization of an on-chip dual-comb source based on MIR QCL-combs. (a) Light intensity-current-voltage characteristic of a typical device. The power represents the total power of the two combs. (b) Optical spectra of the two combs, acquired as described in Fig. 1(c) (0.12 cm−1 resolution). (c) Magnified view of the spectra represented in Fig. 2(b), showing the difference in offset frequencies between the two combs (0.12 cm−1 resolution).

FIG. 2.

Characterization of an on-chip dual-comb source based on MIR QCL-combs. (a) Light intensity-current-voltage characteristic of a typical device. The power represents the total power of the two combs. (b) Optical spectra of the two combs, acquired as described in Fig. 1(c) (0.12 cm−1 resolution). (c) Magnified view of the spectra represented in Fig. 2(b), showing the difference in offset frequencies between the two combs (0.12 cm−1 resolution).

Close modal

For solving this problem, the micro-heaters were used to control Δfceo. Fig. 3(a) shows the optical spectra of the two combs when the current driving the lasers Ilaser and the current driving one of the micro-heaters Iheater,1 are optimized to obtain almost identical offset frequencies, i.e., fceo,1fceo,2. As observed from Fig. 3(a), the two combs seem to be aligned in frequency (within the resolution of the measurement) and do not show a significant difference in offset frequencies as compared to the case when the heater is not used (see Fig. 2(a)).

FIG. 3.

Control of the comb parameters by using the micro-heaters. (a) Optical spectra of the two combs when both the laser current Ilaser and one of the micro-heater currents Iheater,1 were optimized in order to minimize Δfceo. (b) Set of RF spectra acquired for different values of Iheater,1, showing the two RF beatnotes corresponding to frep,1 and frep,2 (resolution bandwidth (RBW) = 3 kHz, span = 5 MHz, sweep time = 35 ms). (c) Values of frep,1 and frep,2 extracted from Fig. 3(b), showing the independent control of the repetition frequencies (dots colored according to the spectra of Fig. 3(b)).

FIG. 3.

Control of the comb parameters by using the micro-heaters. (a) Optical spectra of the two combs when both the laser current Ilaser and one of the micro-heater currents Iheater,1 were optimized in order to minimize Δfceo. (b) Set of RF spectra acquired for different values of Iheater,1, showing the two RF beatnotes corresponding to frep,1 and frep,2 (resolution bandwidth (RBW) = 3 kHz, span = 5 MHz, sweep time = 35 ms). (c) Values of frep,1 and frep,2 extracted from Fig. 3(b), showing the independent control of the repetition frequencies (dots colored according to the spectra of Fig. 3(b)).

Close modal

Further control of the comb parameters is demonstrated by measuring the radio frequency (RF) spectrum of the laser current.24 The RF spectrum contains the beatnotes at the roundtrip frequency of the two combs frep,1 and frep,2, as they are biased in parallel by a unique current driver. One can therefore precisely measure frep,1 and frep,2 with a spectrum analyzer, as shown in Fig. 1(c).

We show the control of frep of a single comb by using one micro-heater to tune frep,1 while the second micro-heater is not utilized, therefore not acting on frep,2. The RF spectra acquired at different values of micro-heater current Iheater,1 (all other parameters being kept fixed) are shown in Fig. 3(b). When increasing the current in the micro-heater, we observe that one RF beatnote is shifted to lower frequencies while the other RF beatnote is not shifted, effectively decreasing Δfrep (observed from Iheater,1 = 80 mA up to 214 mA). Around a precise value of Iheater,1 (around 214 mA here), both repetition frequencies are similar. By further increasing Iheater,1, one RF beatnote is further shifted to lower frequencies and Δfrep starts to increase. For important values of Iheater,1, we observe that both RF beatnotes start to shift to lower frequencies, one being more sensitive to the Iheater,1 than the other. This is explained by the fact that at these values of Iheater,1, the heat dissipated starts to influence the second comb. All these observations are summarized in Fig. 3(c), where frep,1 and frep,2 are represented as a function of Iheater,1. This experiment finally demonstrates the control of the repetition frequency of a single comb by employing the micro-heater. As previously discussed, although the control of fceo and frep of a single comb is possible with our system, these two quantities are yet not controllable independently from each other.

In order to finally demonstrate the capabilities of this system for compact dual-comb spectroscopy applications, we measure the multi-heterodyne beat signal created by the beating of the two combs on a high-bandwidth HgCdTe detector, as shown schematically in Fig. 1(a). In this case, both Δfceo and Δfrep were optimized by controlling Ilaser and Iheater,1 according to the considerations detailed previously. The results shown here are achieved by employing only one micro-heater, but they were also reproduced when using two micro-heaters. Additional control of the system is possible by biasing both lasers independently, improving the system flexibility.

Fig. 4 shows the optimized optical characteristics of the on-chip dual-comb based on QCL-combs. Both comb repetition frequencies were controlled in order to obtain Δfrep3MHz, as shown in Fig. 4(a). At the same time, both comb offset frequencies were optimized to be close to each other. Fig. 4(b) shows the multi-heterodyne beating between the combs, showing that Δfceo<50MHz. This value could be further reduced by slightly adjusting the micro-heater current. Moreover, 64 modes are observed on the multi-heterodyne spectrum, corresponding to an optical bandwidth of 32 cm−1, as the comb repetition frequency is frep0.5cm1 (15 GHz).

FIG. 4.

Optimization for compact dual-comb spectroscopy application. (a) RF spectrum displaying the two beatnotes frep,1 and frep,2, corresponding to Δfrep=3.208MHz (resolution bandwidth (RBW) = 2 kHz, span = 5 MHz, sweep time = 50 ms). (b) Multi-heterodyne beating of the two combs, corresponding to an optical bandwidth of 32 cm−1. Total acquisition time: 100 ms.

FIG. 4.

Optimization for compact dual-comb spectroscopy application. (a) RF spectrum displaying the two beatnotes frep,1 and frep,2, corresponding to Δfrep=3.208MHz (resolution bandwidth (RBW) = 2 kHz, span = 5 MHz, sweep time = 50 ms). (b) Multi-heterodyne beating of the two combs, corresponding to an optical bandwidth of 32 cm−1. Total acquisition time: 100 ms.

Close modal

A further advantage of our system is that technical noise originating from current fluctuations is suppressed. However, Flicker noise originating from the semiconductor laser cannot be reduced by fabricating tow lasers that are not coupled. We have recently demonstrated that Flicker noise is the main source of noise in our lasers at low frequencies.26 We therefore do not expect any substantial reduction in the linewidth of the laser in acquisition times up to 1 s. However, an additional advantage of our system is its robustness regarding temperature drifts, quantified by the relative frequency temperature dependence coefficient 1νΔνRFΔT of one multi-heterodyne beatnote. In order to demonstrate the advantage of an on-chip system compared to a system where both combs would be totally independent, we measure this coefficient by using our previously demonstrated dual-comb spectrometer,24 where the two combs consist of two different devices. In this case, a temperature fluctuation of one comb will directly translate into a temperature drift of the multi-heterodyne beatnotes. However, in a system where both combs are on the same chip, any temperature drift of the substrate will influence both combs in the same manner, therefore, minimizing the temperature drift of the multi-heterodyne beatnotes. A value of −8.8 × 10−5 K−1 is measured in a system where both combs are independent, compared to a value of −1.5 × 10−6 K−1 for the on-chip system, demonstrating a sixty-fold increase of the robustness regarding temperature fluctuations.

In summary, we have demonstrated an on-chip dual-comb system based on MIR QCL-combs. By employing two independent micro-heaters directly integrated next to each QCL-comb source, the combs repetition and offset frequencies are controlled by utilizing the temperature tuning of the refractive index. As a first step for compact dual-comb spectroscopy, we demonstrate that a multi-heterodyne signal originating from the beating of the two combs can be observed and that the parameters Δfceo and Δfrep can be precisely controlled. We show a multi-heterodyne beating corresponding to an optical bandwidth of 32 cm−1 with a Δfrep of 3 MHz, centered at 1330 cm−1. Finally, due to the proximity of the micro-heaters to the QCL active region, these devices can achieve kHz of modulation bandwidth.25 Combined with the recent developments in dispersion compensation of MIR QCL-comb sources,23 this system can be utilized for achieving a fully-stabilized compact dual-comb spectrometer by employing, for example, all-electrical frequency noise stabilization techniques.27 

We thank Dr. Pierre Jouy for fruitful discussions. This work was financially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF200020-152962), by the ETH Pioneer Fellowship programme as well as by the DARPA programme SCOUT (W31P4Q-15-C-0083).

1.
T.
Udem
,
R.
Holzwarth
, and
T. W.
Hänsch
,
Nature
416
,
233
(
2002
).
2.
S. A.
Diddams
,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
27
,
B51
(
2010
).
3.
S.
Schiller
,
Opt. Lett.
27
,
766
(
2002
).
4.
F.
Keilmann
,
C.
Gohle
, and
R.
Holzwarth
,
Opt. Lett.
29
,
1542
(
2004
).
5.
I.
Coddington
,
W. C.
Swann
, and
N. R.
Newbury
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
,
013902
(
2008
).
6.
I.
Coddington
,
W.
Swann
, and
N.
Newbury
,
Phys. Rev. A
82
,
043817
(
2010
).
7.
B.
Bernhardt
,
A.
Ozawa
,
P.
Jacquet
,
M.
Jacquey
,
Y.
Kobayashi
,
T.
Udem
,
R.
Holzwarth
,
G.
Guelachvili
,
T. W.
Hänsch
, and
N.
Picqué
,
Nat. Photonics
4
,
55
(
2010
).
8.
A.
Schliesser
,
N.
Picqué
, and
T. W.
Hänsch
,
Nat. Photonics
6
,
440
(
2012
).
9.
B.
Bernhardt
,
E.
Sorokin
,
P.
Jacquet
,
R.
Thon
,
T.
Becker
,
I.
Sorokina
,
N.
Picqué
, and
T.
Hänsch
,
Appl. Phys. B
100
,
3
(
2010
).
10.
E.
Baumann
,
F.
Giorgetta
,
W.
Swann
,
A.
Zolot
,
I.
Coddington
, and
N.
Newbury
,
Phys. Rev. A
84
,
062513
(
2011
).
11.
F. R.
Giorgetta
,
G. B.
Rieker
,
E.
Baumann
,
W. C.
Swann
,
L. C.
Sinclair
,
J.
Kofler
,
I.
Coddington
, and
N. R.
Newbury
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
115
,
103901
(
2015
).
12.
F.
Adler
,
K. C.
Cossel
,
M. J.
Thorpe
,
I.
Hartl
,
M. E.
Fermann
, and
J.
Ye
,
Opt. Lett.
34
,
1330
(
2009
).
13.
K. L.
Vodopyanov
,
E.
Sorokin
,
I. T.
Sorokina
, and
P. G.
Schunemann
,
Opt. Lett.
36
,
2275
(
2011
).
14.
I.
Galli
,
F.
Cappelli
,
P.
Cancio
,
G.
Giusfredi
,
D.
Mazzotti
,
S.
Bartalini
, and
P.
De Natale
,
Opt. Express
21
,
28877
(
2013
).
15.
F. C.
Cruz
,
D. L.
Maser
,
T.
Johnson
,
G.
Ycas
,
A.
Klose
,
F. R.
Giorgetta
,
I.
Coddington
, and
S. A.
Diddams
,
Opt. Express
23
,
26814
(
2015
).
16.
J.
Faist
,
F.
Capasso
,
D. L.
Sivco
,
C.
Sirtori
,
A. L.
Hutchinson
, and
A. Y.
Cho
,
Science
264
,
553
(
1994
).
17.
A.
Hugi
,
G.
Villares
,
S.
Blaser
,
H.
Liu
, and
J.
Faist
,
Nature
492
,
229
(
2012
).
18.
D.
Burghoff
,
T.-Y.
Kao
,
N.
Han
,
C. W. I.
Chan
,
X.
Cai
,
Y.
Yang
,
D. J.
Hayton
,
J.-R.
Gao
,
J. L.
Reno
, and
Q.
Hu
,
Nat. Photonics
8
,
462
(
2014
).
19.
M.
Rösch
,
G.
Scalari
,
M.
Beck
, and
J.
Faist
,
Nat. Photonics
9
,
42
(
2015
).
20.
Q.
Lu
,
M.
Razeghi
,
S.
Slivken
,
N.
Bandyopadhyay
,
Y.
Bai
,
W.
Zhou
,
M.
Chen
,
D.
Heydari
,
A.
Haddadi
,
R.
McClintock
 et al,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
106
,
051105
(
2015
).
21.
J. B.
Khurgin
,
Y.
Dikmelik
,
A.
Hugi
, and
J.
Faist
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
081118
(
2014
).
22.
G.
Villares
and
J.
Faist
,
Opt. Express
23
,
1651
(
2015
).
23.
G.
Villares
,
S.
Riedi
,
J.
Wolf
,
D.
Kazakov
,
M. J.
Süess
,
M.
Beck
, and
J.
Faist
, “
Dispersion engineering of quantum cascade lasers frequency combs
,” preprint arXiv:1509.08856 (
2015
).
24.
G.
Villares
,
A.
Hugi
,
S.
Blaser
, and
J.
Faist
,
Nat. Commun.
5
,
5192
(
2014
).
25.
A.
Bismuto
,
Y.
Bidaux
,
C.
Tardy
,
R.
Terazzi
,
T.
Gresch
,
J.
Wolf
,
S.
Blaser
,
A.
Müller
, and
J.
Faist
,
Opt. Express
23
(
23
),
29715
29722
(
2015
).
26.
F.
Cappelli
,
G.
Villares
,
S.
Riedi
, and
J.
Faist
,
Optica
2
,
836
(
2015
).
27.
I.
Sergachev
,
R.
Maulini
,
A.
Bismuto
,
S.
Blaser
,
T.
Gresch
,
Y.
Bidaux
,
A.
Müller
,
S.
Schilt
, and
T.
Südmeyer
,
Opt. Lett.
39
,
6411
(
2014
).