Ambient magnetic field, if trapped in the penetration depth, leads to the residual resistance and therefore sets the limit for the achievable quality factors in superconducting niobium resonators for particle accelerators. Here, we show that a complete expulsion of the magnetic flux can be performed and leads to: (1) record quality factors Q > 2 × 1011 up to accelerating gradient of 22 MV/m; (2) Q ∼ 3 × 1010 at 2 K and 16 MV/m in up to 190 mG magnetic fields. This is achieved by large thermal gradients at the normal/superconducting phase front during the cooldown. Our findings open up a way to ultra-high quality factors at low temperatures and show an alternative to the sophisticated magnetic shielding implemented in modern superconducting accelerators.

The microwave surface resistance Rs of superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities can be represented as a sum of the strongly temperature dependent RBCS(T) caused by thermally excited quasiparticles,1 and a temperature independent residual resistance Rres. Trapped magnetic flux increases Rs by contributing to Rres, and the contribution is thought to come from the normal conducting cores of the trapped fluxoids.2 Since RBCS(T)exp{Δ/kT}—where Δ is the superconducting gap—is exponentially vanishing at lower temperatures, the minimum achievable value of Rs remains limited by Rres, thereby setting the limit on the achievable quality factor Q1/Rs. For fine grain (∼50 μm) size niobium used to manufacture the majority of SRF cavities, the previous understanding was that close to 100% of the ambient magnetic field gets trapped during the transition to superconducting state. Magnetic shielding to lower the magnetic field amplitude at cavity walls was considered the only option to avoid the increased Rres and increased wall dissipation, and has therefore been implemented as the essential part of all SRF accelerators.

It was discovered at Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin (HZB) that the residual resistance of niobium cavities can be affected by the cooling dynamics during normal/superconducting transition,3,4 which takes place for niobium at the critical temperature Tc=9.25K.

The cavity used for HZB studies was dressed—meaning that it had titanium vessel welded around it, which gets filled with liquid helium in order to cool the cavity down to temperatures of 2 K or below (see Fig. 1 in Ref. 4 for a schematic). This is a typical cooling design for cavities in accelerators, whereas bare cavities without titanium vessels are typically submerged in liquid helium in a vertical test cryostat for measurements. Based on the readings of the temperature sensors on the beam tubes outside of titanium vessel, the effect found at HZB was attributed to the additional magnetic field generated by thermal currents, which gets trapped during the cooldown through Tc. Such thermal currents in the thermocouple loop created by the cavity and titanium vessel are generated if the temperatures at the niobium-titanium junctions on both sides are different. Theoretical analysis showed5 that broken current flow symmetry is required in order for this contribution to be non-negligible.

A different physical mechanism was subsequently discovered at Fermilab6 by mounting the fluxgate magnetometers and temperature sensors directly on the walls of both bare and dressed cavities. The residual resistance was demonstrated to be tracking the changes in the trapped fraction of the ambient magnetic field, and the better expulsion/lower Rres to correspond to the larger temperature gradients at the normal/superconducting transition front during the cooling through Tc. This new effect suggested that much higher fields than previously thought could, in principle, be expelled using high enough thermal gradients at Tc.

In this paper, we report the discoveries of: (1) full flux expulsion leading to record Q values of >2 × 1011 up to accelerating gradient Eacc=22MV/m; (2) almost complete flux expulsion leading to Q ∼ 3 × 1010 at 2 K and Eacc=16MV/m even in high magnetic fields of B ≤ 190 mG attainable with little or no magnetic shielding. Detailed temperature and magnetic field measurements show that the determining parameter is the temperature gradient dT/dx at the normal/superconducting phase front and reveal its threshold values required for efficient flux expulsion of about 0.1–0.2 K/cm.

We used a 1.3 GHz single cell TESLA shaped cavity for our studies, which was prepared by nitrogen doping.7 Among the cavity preparation procedures, nitrogen doped cavities possess highest quality factors and are the most sensitive to the trapped flux, thus making them the ideal tool to study the flux expulsion. All the measurements were performed at Fermilab vertical testing facility, which has magnetic shielding with the ambient fields typically reduced down to <5 mG values.

In order to control the magnetic field, Helmholtz coils were assembled around the cavity. Three single-axis Bartington Mag-01H cryogenic fluxgate magnetometers were mounted around the equator with ∼120° spacing to measure the magnetic field along the cavity axis (vertical) direction. Transverse components of the Earth magnetic field are also present in the test cryostat, but they are lower than the vertical one due to the geometry of the magnetic shield (vertical cylinder) and are not varied by the Helmholtz coils. Three Cernox temperature sensors were mounted as follows: one at the top iris, one at the equator, and one at the bottom iris. The picture of the setup and the schematic of the probe mounting are shown in Fig. 1. We define Bavg=(B1+B2+B3)/3.

FIG. 1.

Picture of the setup and schematic of the magnetic and temperature probes mounting used for the measurements.

FIG. 1.

Picture of the setup and schematic of the magnetic and temperature probes mounting used for the measurements.

Close modal

The cooldowns were performed under different ambient magnetic fields ranging between 2 mG and 190 mG and from different starting temperatures ranging from 300 K to 12 K. The cavity quality factor Q was measured as a function of the accelerating gradient Eacc at 2 K and—for most of the measurements—at the lowest achievable temperature of 1.5 K.

First set of results is shown in Fig. 2 with Q of the cavity reaching above 2 × 1011 up to the accelerating field of 22 MV/m for three different cooldowns in three different Bavg = 2 mG; 10 mG; and 23 mG. We select 4 MV/m and 16 MV/m as representative gradients to compare with the previous literature data and to provide direct information for medium gradient accelerators such as LCLS-II. No degradation in Q with increasing ambient magnetic fields suggests that the fields are fully expelled. Furthermore, it shows that full expulsion can be achieved by cooling from different starting temperatures.

FIG. 2.

Q(Eacc) curves at T1 = T2 = T3 = 2 K for three different cooldowns in different Bavg.

FIG. 2.

Q(Eacc) curves at T1 = T2 = T3 = 2 K for three different cooldowns in different Bavg.

Close modal

The second result, which was obtained after cooling from 300∼K in Bavg=190mG, is shown in Fig. 3. Despite the very high magnetic field, which is within a factor of two from the Earth's magnetic field, the measured Q = 2.9 × 1010 at 2 K and 16 MV/m is still high enough to satisfy the requirements of the LCLS-II project (Q = 2.7 × 1010 at 16 MV/m), which has the highest Q specification out of all SRF-based accelerators ever proposed or built.

FIG. 3.

Q(Eacc) curves at T1 = T2 = T3 = 2 K (black) and T1 = T2 = T3 = 1.5 K (red) measured after cooldown from 300 K in Bavg190mG.

FIG. 3.

Q(Eacc) curves at T1 = T2 = T3 = 2 K (black) and T1 = T2 = T3 = 1.5 K (red) measured after cooldown from 300 K in Bavg190mG.

Close modal

In order to pinpoint the required thermal conditions for efficient flux expulsion, we have fixed the ambient field to 10 mG and varied temperature distribution along the cavity during cooling cycles by changing the starting temperature and helium flow rate. Obtained values of Rres were calculated from measured Q at 1.5 K using Rres=G/Q, where G = 270 is the cavity geometry factor. The results are shown in Fig. 4 (and Q values in the inset) as a function of temperature difference between the top iris (T1) and equator (T2), and in Fig. 5 as a function of the cooling rate dT2/dt|T2=Tc. As it can be clearly seen, temperature difference at the phase front is the main factor for flux expulsion, while cooling rate itself has no clear effect. This finding is consistent with one of our proposed interpretations in Ref. 6 and may also be related to the thermal depinning work of Huebener and Seher.8 

FIG. 4.

Residual resistance at 1.5 K as a function of the temperature gradient present at the normal/superconducting front as measured when equator reaches Tc. Inset shows the corresponding Q values.

FIG. 4.

Residual resistance at 1.5 K as a function of the temperature gradient present at the normal/superconducting front as measured when equator reaches Tc. Inset shows the corresponding Q values.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

Residual resistance at 1.5 K as a function of the cooling rate measured when equator reaches Tc.

FIG. 5.

Residual resistance at 1.5 K as a function of the cooling rate measured when equator reaches Tc.

Close modal

In our previous work,6 we have shown via magnetostatic simulations that if the magnetic flux is fully expelled, the vertical component of the magnetic field at the equator should be increased by close to a factor of 1.8. Therefore, a ratio of the flux magnetometer readings before and right after the transition provides a measure of the amount of the flux expelled. In Fig. 6, a summary plot for all the cooling procedures in various magnetic fields is shown. Fast increase in the trapped fraction (decrease in the expulsion ratio) is clearly observed as soon as the temperature difference across the top half-cell drops below ∼1–2 K, which corresponds to the gradient of 0.1–0.2 K/cm along the cavity surface. This increase in trapping causes the increase in Rres shown in Fig. 5.

FIG. 6.

Ratio of the magnetic field at the equator in superconducting state (Bsc) to that in the normal state (Bnc).

FIG. 6.

Ratio of the magnetic field at the equator in superconducting state (Bsc) to that in the normal state (Bnc).

Close modal

An identical TESLA shape cavity but prepared by electropolishing/120 °C baking was measured in some cooldowns as well and exhibited a very similar qualitative behavior (red circles in Fig. 6). This suggests that the expulsion efficiency is not determined by surface pinning properties, as 120 °C baked cavities have a drastically lower electron mean free path at the surface (and therefore different pinning strength).9 

In this paper, we have shown that optimized Meissner expulsion procedure allows to completely eliminate the magnetic flux contribution and results in ultralow residual resistances even in high magnetic fields of up to 190 mG. If coupled with the ultralow BCS and non-flux residual resistance achieved via nitrogen doping, record quality factors of >2 × 1011 emerge up to high fields. As one of the immediate practical implications, a variety of large-scale SRF-based projects, i.e., LCLS-II at SLAC and PIP-II at FNAL, can have a significantly lower operational power even with poor magnetic shielding.

The implications also extend to any other superconducting devices involving trapped flux, where changing the temperature gradient during the transition through Tc can allow to tune the trapped flux amount for the fixed applied magnetic field.

This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Offices of High Energy and Nuclear Physics. Authors would like to acknowledge technical assistance of A. Rowe, M. Merio, B. Golden, Y. Pischalnikov, B. Squires, G. Kirschbaum, D. Marks, and R. Ward for cavity preparation and testing. Fermilab is operated by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the United States Department of Energy.

1.
D. C.
Mattis
and
J.
Bardeen
,
Phys. Rev.
111
,
412
(
1958
).
2.
H.
Padamsee
,
J.
Knobloch
, and
T.
Hays
,
RF Superconductivity for Accelerators
(
John Wiley and Sons
,
1998
).
3.
O.
Kugeler
,
A.
Neumann
,
S.
Voronenko
,
W.
Anders
,
J.
Knobloch
,
M.
Schster
,
A.
Frahm
,
S.
Klauke
,
D.
Pfluckhahn
, and
S.
Rotterdam
, in
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on RF Superconductivity
, TUPPO053 (Berlin, Germany,
2009
), p.
352
.
4.
J.-M.
Vogt
,
O.
Kugeler
, and
J.
Knobloch
,
Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. – Accel. Beams
16
,
102002
(
2013
).
5.
A.
Crawford
, preprint arXiv:1403.7996 (
2014
).
6.
A.
Romanenko
,
A.
Grassellino
,
O.
Melnychuk
, and
D. A.
Sergatskov
,
J. Appl. Phys.
115
,
184903
(
2014
).
7.
A.
Grassellino
,
A.
Romanenko
,
D.
Sergatskov
,
O.
Melnychuk
,
Y.
Trenikhina
,
A.
Crawford
,
A.
Rowe
,
M.
Wong
,
T.
Khabiboulline
, and
F.
Barkov
,
Supercond. Sci. Technol.
26
,
102001
(
2013
).
8.
R. P.
Huebener
and
A.
Seher
,
Phys. Rev.
181
,
701
(
1969
).
9.
A.
Romanenko
,
A.
Grassellino
,
F.
Barkov
,
A.
Suter
,
Z.
Salman
, and
T.
Prokscha
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
072601
(
2014
).