We demonstrate that the contrast reversal effect in scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) is related to the interface microroughness. The surface roughness has been associated with the concentration of states at the interface and a monotonic behavior of the SCM imaging is preferentially observed for a smooth surface and consequently a low state concentration. Changes in the oxide quality have also been found to strongly influence the measurements. A criterion based on the hysteresis measurements from forward and reverse curves is discussed to better evaluate the oxide quality and to obtain reproducible SCM data.
REFERENCES
1.
R.
Stephenson
, A.
Verhulst
, P.
De Wolf
, M.
Caymax
, and W.
Vandervost
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
73
, 2597
(1998
).2.
3.
P.
Malberti
, L.
Ciampolini
, M.
Cappia
, and W.
Fichtner
, AIP Conf. Proc.
550
, 652
(2001
).4.
J.
Smoliner
, B.
Basnar
, S.
Golka
, E.
Gornik
, B.
Löffler
, M.
Schatzmayr
, and H.
Enichlmair
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
79
, 3182
(2001
).5.
6.
R.
Stephenson
, A.
Verhulst
, P.
De Wolf
, M.
Caymax
, and W.
Vandervorst
, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
18
, 405
(2000
).7.
F.
Giannazzo
, F.
Priolo
, V.
Raineri
, V.
Privitera
, A.
Picariello
, A.
Battaglia
, and S.
Moffatt
, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
20
, 414
(2002
).8.
9.
E. H. Nicollian and J. R. Brews, Metal–oxide–semiconductor Physics and Technology (Wiley, New York, 1982).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Institute of Physics.
2002
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.