Our results prove the local origin of magnetoresistance in electrochemically deposited Ni nanocontacts. Experiments have been done using a complex setup for both in situ growth and ballistic magnetoresistance (BMR) measurements. Nanocontacts have been grown between two macroscopic Ni wires. In situ experiments with variation of the nanocontact diameter from 3 to 20 nm have been done using the same pair of wires. BMR values from 0.5% to 100% have been observed but no correlation of BMR value with the sample resistance, i.e., with the nanocontact cross section, has been found. These results show that the BMR in the nanometric size contact is determined by local geometrical and magnetic structures near the nanocontact rather than by the contact cross section itself. The hypothesis of existence of the intrinsic nonmagnetic dead layer in the ferromagnetic nanocontact is proposed to account for the BMR properties of the nanometric size contacts. Additionally, we report a BMR value of 200% in a Ni nanocontact (5 nm diameter) electrochemically grown between two nonmagnetic macroscopic gold wires. An external magnetic field has been used during the electrochemical deposition to fix the easy magnetic axis of the deposited Ni layer.

Topics
Ferromagnetic materials, Magnetic ordering, Nanocontacts, Transition metals
1.
N.
Garcı́a
,
M.
Muñoz
, and
Y.-W.
Zhao
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
82
,
2923
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
G. G.
 
Cabrera
 and
L. M.
 
Falicov
,
Phys. Status Solidi B
 
61
,
539
(
1974
);
Google Scholar
 
G.
 
Tatara
 and
H.
 
Fukuama
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
 
78
,
3773
(
1997
);
Google Scholar
 
G.
Tatara
,
Y.-W.
Zhao
,
M.
Muñoz
, and
N.
Garcı́a
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
83
,
2030
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
N.
 
Garcı́a
,
I. G.
 
Saveliev
,
Y.-W.
 
Zhao
, and
A.
 
Zlatkine
,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
 
214
,
7
(
2000
);
Google Scholar
 
N.
Garcı́a
,
H.
Rohrer
,
I. G.
Saveliev
, and
Y.-W.
Zhao
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
85
,
3053
(
2000
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
N. Garcı́a, M. Muñoz, G. G. Qian, H. Rohrer, I. G. Saveliev, and Y. W. Zhao, Appl. Phys. Lett. (submitted);
N. Garcı́a, M. Muñoz, V. V. Osipov, E. V. Ponizovskaya, G. G. Qian, I. G. Saveliev, and Y.-W. Zhao, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. (to be published).
5.
M. N.
 
Baibich
,
J. M.
 
Broto
,
A.
 
Fert
,
F.
 
Nguyen Van Dau
,
F.
 
Petroff
,
P.
 
Eitenne
,
G.
 
Creuzet
,
A.
 
Friederich
, and
J.
 
Chazelas
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
 
61
,
2472
(
1988
);
Google Scholar
 
G.
Binasch
,
P.
Grünberg
,
F.
Saurenbach
, and
W.
Zinn
,
Phys. Rev. B
39
,
4828
(
1989
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
J. S.
 
Moodera
,
L. R.
 
Kinder
,
T. M.
 
Wong
, and
R.
 
Meservey
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
 
74
,
3273
(
1995
);
Google Scholar
 
S.
Tehrani
,
J. M.
Slaughter
,
E.
Chen
,
M.
Durlam
,
J.
Shi
, and
M.
DE Herrera
,
IEEE Trans. Magn.
35
,
2814
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
A. G.
Jansen
,
A. P.
van Gelder
, and
P.
Wider
,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
13
,
6073
(
1980
).
Google Scholar
 
8.
G.
Wexler
,
Proc. Phys. Soc. London
89
,
927
(
1966
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
P.
Bruno
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
83
,
2425
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
10.
V. A. Molyneux, V. V. Osipov, and E. V. Ponizovskaya (unpublished).
11.
N.
 
Giordano
 and
J. D.
 
Mounier
,
Physica D
 
194
,
1009
(
1994
);
Google Scholar
 
K.
Hought
and
N.
Giordano
,
Phys. Rev. B
51
,
9855
(
1995
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
F.
Gordon
and
J.
Hughes
,
J. Appl. Phys.
49
,
5306
(
1983
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 American Institute of Physics.
2002
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.