A combined experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study of laser ablation of a model bicomponent system with solutes of different volatility provides a consistent picture of the mechanisms of material ejection. The comparison of the ejection yields shows that there are two distinct regimes of molecular ejection, desorption at low laser fluences, and a collective ejection of a volume of material or ablation at higher fluences. Ejection of volatile solutes dominates in the desorption regime, whereas nonvolatile solutes are ejected only in the ablation regime.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
A.
Piqué
, R. A.
McGill
, D. B.
Chrisey
, J. H.
Callahan
, and T. E.
Mlsna
, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.
526
, 375
(1998
).3.
W. A.
Tolbert
, I.-Y. S.
Lee
, M. M.
Doxtader
, E. W.
Ellis
, and D. D.
Dlott
, J. Imaging Sci. Technol.
37
, 411
(1993
).4.
L. V.
Zhigilei
, P. B. S.
Kodali
, and B. J.
Garrison
, Chem. Phys. Lett.
276
, 269
(1997
).5.
6.
7.
K.
Dreisewerd
, M.
Schürenberg
, M.
Karas
, and F.
Hillenkamp
, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes
141
, 127
(1995
).8.
L. V.
Zhigilei
, P. B. S.
Kodali
, and B. J.
Garrison
, J. Phys. Chem. B
101
, 2028
(1997
);L. V.
Zhigilei
, P. B. S.
Kodali
, and B. J.
Garrison
, J. Phys. Chem. B
102
, 2845
(1998
).9.
10.
L.
Dutkiewicz
, R. E.
Johnson
, A.
Vertes
, and R.
Pedrys
, J. Phys. Chem. B
103
, 2925
(1999
).11.
12.
13.
Y.
Tsuboi
, K.
Hatanaka
, H.
Fukumura
, and H.
Masuhara
, J. Phys. Chem.
98
, 11237
(1994
).14.
S.
Georgiou
, A.
Koubenakis
, M.
Lassithiotaki
, and J.
Labrakis
, J. Chem. Phys.
109
, 8591
(1998
).15.
A.
Koubenakis
, T.
Elimioti
, and S.
Georgiou
, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.
69
, S637
(1999
).16.
S.
Georgiou
, A.
Koubenakis
, P.
Kontoleta
, and M.
Syrrou
, Chem. Phys. Lett.
270
, 491
(1997
).17.
L. V.
Zhigilei
and B. J.
Garrison
, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.
69
, S75
(1999
).18.
A. Koubenakis, J. Labrakis, and S. Georgiou (unpublished).
19.
A relatively straightforward estimate for comparing the relative fluence values between the experimental and calculated results is to examine the temperature at the surface of the irradiated sample at approximately the ablation threshold. Both systems are in the thermal confinement regime. Ignoring reflection losses, where F is the fluence, Lp is the penetration depth, C is the heat capacity, and ρ is the density. For the experiment with ether, J/(K kg) and K+1200 K, a value comparable to the boiling temperature and twice the melting temperature of pure toluene. For the calculation, kg/mol)= J/(K kg) and K+35 K, a value approximately twice the melting temperature of the model system and certainly a temperature where explosive boiling should occur.
20.
21.
P. B. S.
Kodali
, L. V.
Zhigilei
, and B. J.
Garrison
, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B
153
, 167
(1999
).22.
U.
Buck
, H.
Meyer
, D.
Nelson
, G.
Fraser
, and W.
Klemperer
, J. Chem. Phys.
88
, 3028
(1988
), and references therein.23.
T. D.
Märk
, M.
Foltin
, M.
Kolibar
, M.
Lezius
, and P.
Schreiber
, Phys. Scr., T
53
, 43
(1994
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 American Institute of Physics.
2001
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.