An analysis of the field emission from emitter tips with the geometry of a prolate ellipsoid of revolution indicates that the field enhancement factor, β, and effective emission area, α, are not constant but instead depend on the applied field. The added complexity of a materials related limit on the minimum time for transition of an electron from the solid into the vacuum is also examined in the analysis. The calculated variations of α and β are as large as 35%, and in some instances could result in erroneous interpretation of measured current‐voltage (I‐V) characteristic data.
Topics
Surface collisions
REFERENCES
1.
2.
A. K.
Ganguly
, P. M.
Phillips
, and H. F.
Gray
, J. Appl. Phys.
67
, 7098
(1990
).3.
D. A. Kirkpatrick, G. L. Bergeron, M. A. Czarnaski, R. C. Davidson, H. P. Freund, J. J. Hickman, A. Mankofsky, K. T. Tsang, J. M. Schnur, M. Levinson, and B. M. Ditchek, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A (1991) (accepted for publication).
4.
5.
D.
Alpert
, D. A.
Lee
, E. M.
Lyman
, and H. E.
Tomaschke
, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
1
, 35
(1964
).6.
7.
8.
C. A.
Spindt
, I.
Brodie
, L.
Humphrey
, and E. R.
Westerberg
, J. Appl. Phys.
47
, 5248
(1976
).9.
G. A. Farral, in Vacuum Arcs, Theory and Application, edited by J. M. Lafferty (Wiley, New York, 1980), Ch. 2.
10.
11.
12.
13.
D. F. Howell, R. D. Groves, R. A. Lee, C. Patel, and H. A. Williams, Technical Digest of the International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1989), p. 525.
14.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1992 American Institute of Physics.
1992
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
