When time-reversal and inversion symmetry are broken, superconducting circuits may exhibit a so-called diode effect, where the critical currents for opposite directions of the current flow differ. In recent years, this effect has been observed in a multitude of systems, and the different physical ingredients that may yield such an effect are well understood. On a microscopic level, the interplay between spin–orbit coupling and a Zeeman field may give rise to a diode effect in a single Josephson junction. However, so far, there is no analytical description of the effect within a simple model. Here, we study a single-channel nanowire with Rashba spin–orbit coupling and in the presence of a Zeeman field. We show that the different Fermi velocities and spin projections of the two pseudo-spin bands lead to a diode effect. Simple analytical expressions for the diode efficiency can be obtained in limiting cases.

1.
M.
Nadeem
,
M. S.
Fuhrer
, and
X.
Wang
,
Nat. Rev. Phys.
5
,
558
(
2023
).
2.
N.
Nagaosa
and
Y.
Yanase
,
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
15
,
63
(
2024
).
3.
F.
Ando
,
Y.
Miyasaka
,
T.
Li
et al,
Nature
584
,
373
(
2020
).
4.
L.
Bauriedl
,
C.
Bäuml
,
L.
Fuchs
et al,
Nat. Commun.
13
,
4266
(
2022
).
5.
J. X.
Lin
,
P.
Siriviboon
,
H. D.
Scammell
et al,
Nat. Phys.
18
,
1221
(
2022
).
6.
N.
Satchell
,
P. M.
Shepley
,
M. C.
Rosamond
, and
G.
Burnell
,
J. Appl. Phys.
133
,
203901
(
2023
).
7.
Y.
Hou
,
F.
Nichele
,
H.
Chi
et al,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
131
,
027001
(
2023
).
8.
C.
Baumgartner
,
L.
Fuchs
,
A.
Costa
et al,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
17
,
39
(
2022
).
9.
B.
Pal
,
A.
Chakraborty
,
P. K.
Sivakumar
et al,
Nat. Phys.
18
,
1228
(
2022
).
10.
T. A.
Fulton
,
L. N.
Dunkleberger
, and
R. C.
Dynes
,
Phys. Rev. B
6
,
855
(
1972
).
11.
H.
Wu
,
Y.
Wang
,
Y.
Xu
et al,
Nature
604
,
653
(
2022
).
12.
J.
Díez-Mérida
,
A.
Díez-Carlón
,
S. Y.
Yang
et al,
Nat. Commun.
14
,
2396
(
2023
).
13.
M.
Trahms
,
L.
Melischek
,
J. F.
Steiner
et al,
Nature
615
,
628
(
2023
).
14.
J.
Chiles
,
E. G.
Arnault
,
C.-C.
Chen
et al,
Nano Lett.
23
,
5257
(
2023
).
15.
B.
Zhang
,
Z.
Li
,
V.
Aguilar
et al, arXiv:2212.00199 (
2022
).
16.
A. A.
Reynoso
,
G.
Usaj
,
C. A.
Balseiro
,
D.
Feinberg
, and
M.
Avignon
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
101
,
107001
(
2008
).
17.
A. A.
Reynoso
,
G.
Usaj
,
C. A.
Balseiro
,
D.
Feinberg
, and
M.
Avignon
,
Phys. Rev. B
86
,
214519
(
2012
).
18.
T.
Yokoyama
,
M.
Eto
, and
Y. V.
Nazarov
,
Phys. Rev. B
89
,
195407
(
2014
).
19.
V. B.
Geshkenbein
and
A. I.
Larkin
,
Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.
43
,
306
(
1986
)
V. B.
Geshkenbein
and
A. I.
Larkin
, [
JETP Lett.
43
,
395
(
1986
)].
20.
I. V.
Krive
,
L. Y.
Gorelik
,
R. I.
Shekhter
, and
M.
Jonson
,
Fiz. Nizk. Temp.
30
,
535
(
2004
)
I. V.
Krive
,
L. Y.
Gorelik
,
R. I.
Shekhter
, and
M.
Jonson
, [
Low Temp. Phys.
30
,
398
(
2004
)].
21.
22.
J.-X.
Hu
,
Z.-T.
Sun
,
Y.-M.
Xie
, and
K. T.
Law
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
130
,
266003
(
2023
).
23.
P. A.
Volkov
,
E.
Lantagne-Hurtubise
,
T.
Tummuru
,
S.
Plugge
,
J. H.
Pixley
, and
M.
Franz
,
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
094518
(
2024
).
24.
M.
Governale
and
U.
Zülicke
,
Phys. Rev. B
66
,
073311
(
2002
).
25.
S.
Park
and
A. L.
Yeyati
,
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
125416
(
2017
).
26.
R. M.
Lutchyn
,
J. D.
Sau
, and
S.
Das Sarma
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
105
,
077001
(
2010
).
27.
Y.
Oreg
,
G.
Refael
, and
F.
von Oppen
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
105
,
177002
(
2010
).
28.
K. N.
Nesterov
,
M.
Houzet
, and
J. S.
Meyer
,
Phys. Rev. B
93
,
174502
(
2016
).
29.
In a 3D nanowire, typically a λ F: in that case, the orbital effect needs to be taken into account for a quantitative prediction of the diode effect at the optimal field.
30.
The magnetic field in the leads may also affect the induced superconductivity, leading to different gaps Δ ± in the two pseudo-spin bands. Here, we neglect this effect.
31.
T.
de Picoli
,
Z.
Blood
,
Y.
Lyanda-Geller
, and
J. I.
Väyrynen
,
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
224518
(
2023
).
32.
S. J.
De
,
U.
Khanna
,
S.
Rao
, and
S.
Das
,
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
L161403
(
2023
).
33.
J.
Cayao
,
N.
Nagaosa
, and
Y.
Tanaka
,
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
L081405
(
2024
).
34.
F.
Dolcini
,
M.
Houzet
, and
J. S.
Meyer
,
Phys. Rev. B
92
,
035428
(
2015
).
35.
Note that the same equations may also be used to describe an asymmetric SQUID,36,37 where the subscript j labels the two Josephson junctions in the SQUID loop and ϕ j = j Φ / ( 2 Φ 0 ) with Φ the flux through the loop.
36.
Y.
Fominov
and
D. S.
Mikhailov
,
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
134514
(
2022
).
37.
R. S.
Souto
,
M.
Leijnse
, and
C.
Schrade
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
129
,
267702
(
2022
).
38.
A.
Levchenko
,
A.
Kamenev
, and
L. I.
Glazman
,
Phys. Rev. B
74
,
212509
(
2006
).
39.
C.
Ishii
,
Prog. Theor. Phys.
44
,
1525
(
1970
).
40.
One obtains the same current-phase relation when finite-momentum pairing is realized in the conventional superconducting leads.41,42
41.
A.
Zazunov
,
J.
Rech
,
T.
Jonckheere
,
B.
Grémaud
,
T.
Martin
, and
R.
Egger
,
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
024504
(
2024
).
42.
M.
Davydova
,
S.
Prembabu
, and
L.
Fu
,
Sci. Adv.
8
,
eabo0309
(
2022
).
43.
Similar results for the case Δ + = Δ were obtained in Ref. 44.
44.
P.-H.
Fu
,
Y.
Xu
,
S. A.
Yang
,
C. H.
Lee
,
Y. S.
Ang
, and
J.-F.
Liu
,
Phys. Rev. Applied
321
,
054057
(
2024
).
45.
J.
Kammhuber
,
M. C.
Cassidy
,
F.
Pei
et al,
Nat. Commun.
8
,
478
(
2017
).
46.
R. D.
Monaghan
and
G. C.
Tettamanzi
, arXiv:2403.05052 (
2024
).
You do not currently have access to this content.