Wet thermoacoustic engines (WTEs) are simple, robust energy conversion devices that employ a condensable vapor to generate acoustic power from heat. While previous studies focused on the potential of WTE technology to convert low-grade heat to power, this work focuses on the WTE's dependence on the working gas mixture, unique mass transport, and low working temperature properties, which make it a potential candidate for thermally driven separation processes, e.g., distillation and water desalination. In a set of experiments, the steady-state behavior of a water-based, standing-wave WTE was studied. The results highlight a remarkable trait of this system—a WTE is capable of producing a substantial flux of water vapor while exhibiting an operating hot-side temperature significantly lower than the boiling point. This “limiting temperature” is independent of the heat input to the system—theoretically predicted in systems that have no external “load” that consumes the acoustic power. In addition, the results suggest that the characteristics of the working gas play an important role in determining the device behavior. It was shown that in the tested range, a heavier, more complex-structured gas has significantly improved the steady-state performance of the engine. Specifically, a WTE working with SF6 as its working gas exhibited a vapor mass flux nearly three times greater than simple evaporation at the same heating power while maintaining a temperature as low as 57 °C. The link between gas characteristics and engine behavior is outlined. In conclusion, potential applications of the device and future research avenues are discussed.

1.
A.
Elson
,
R.
Tidball
, and
A.
Hampson
,
Waste Heat to Power Market Assessment
(
Oakridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, ICF International, Inc
.,
2015
).
2.
A.
Al-Karaghouli
and
L.
Kazmerski
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
24
,
343
(
2013
).
3.
A. S.
Rattner
and
S.
Garimella
, “
Energy harvesting, reuse and upgrade to reduce primary energy usage in the USA
,”
Energy
36
,
6172
(
2011
).
4.
G.
Swift
, “
Thermoacoustic engines
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
1145
(
1988
).
5.
O.
Weltsch
,
A.
Offner
,
D.
Liberzon
, and
G. Z.
Ramon
, “
Adsorption mediated mass streaming
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
118
,
244301
(
2017
).
6.
K.
Tsuda
and
Y.
Ueda
, “
Critical temperature of traveling and standing-wave thermoacoustic engines using a wet regenerator
,”
Appl. Energy
196
,
62
(
2017
).
7.
A.
Meir
,
A.
Offner
, and
G. Z.
Ramon
, “
Low-temperature energy conversion using a phase-change acoustic heat engine
,”
Appl. Energy
231
,
372
(
2018
).
8.
Y.
Blayer
,
N.
Elkayam
, and
G. Z.
Ramon
, “
Phase-dependence of sorption-induced mass streaming in an acoustic field
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
115
,
033703
(
2019
).
9.
R.
Yang
,
A.
Meir
, and
G. Z.
Ramon
, “
Theoretical performance characteristics of a travelling-wave phase-change thermoacoustic engine for low-grade heat recovery
,”
Appl. Energy
261
,
114377
(
2020
).
10.
R.
Raspet
,
W. V.
Slaton
,
C. J.
Hickey
, and
R. A.
Hiller
, “
Theory of inert gas-condensing vapor thermoacoustics: Propagation equation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
1414
1422
(
2002
).
11.
B.
Poling
,
J.
O'Connell
, and
J.
Prausnitz
,
The Properties of Gases and Liquids
, 5th ed. (
McGraw Hill
,
New York
,
2001
).
12.
C.
Shen
,
Y.
He
,
Y.
Li
,
H.
Ke
,
D.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Liu
, “
Performance of solar powered thermoacoustic engine at different tilted angles
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
29
,
2745
(
2009
).
13.
A.
Offner
,
R.
Yang
,
D.
Felman
,
N.
Elkayam
,
Y.
Agnon
, and
G. Z.
Ramon
, “
Acoustic oscillations driven by boundary mass exchange
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
866
,
316
(
2019
).

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.