We developed resonance compensating chirp mode (RCCM), an atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique to measure the frequency dependence of the complex shear modulus of live cells over a large bandwidth (quasi-) continuously. RCCM works by applying a continuous frequency sweep (chirp) to the z-scanner and recording the resulting cantilever deflection at high speed. From this data, the frequency-resolved complex shear modulus is extracted. To reach a high maximum frequency, we iteratively shaped the chirp signal to compensate for scanner resonances. This allowed us to measure at frequencies five times higher than the resonant frequency of the scanner. Using a high-speed AFM with small cantilevers, we measured the complex shear modulus of live fibroblast cells in a continuous range between 5 Hz and 30 kHz. We found that the modulus and the loss tangent exhibit a power-law behavior throughout this frequency range. A short chirp duration of 200 ms allowed us to map live cells and generate spatially resolved images of the power-law parameters within minutes. These maps represent a unique combination of high spatial and frequency resolution, low measurement duration, and high maximum frequency.

1.
B.
Fabry
,
G. N.
Maksym
,
J. P.
Butler
,
M.
Glogauer
,
D.
Navajas
, and
J. J.
Fredberg
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
87
,
148102
(
2001
).
2.
B. A.
Smith
,
B.
Tolloczko
,
J. G.
Martin
, and
P.
Grütter
,
Biophys. J.
88
,
2994
(
2005
).
3.
P.
Kollmannsberger
and
B.
Fabry
,
Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.
41
,
75
(
2011
).
4.
T.
Igarashi
,
S.
Fujinami
,
T.
Nishi
,
N.
Asao
, and
K.
Nakajima
,
Macromolecules
46
,
1916
(
2013
).
5.
P.
Cai
,
Y.
Mizutani
,
M.
Tsuchiya
,
J. M.
Maloney
,
B.
Fabry
,
K. J.
Van Vliet
, and
T.
Okajima
,
Biophys. J.
105
,
1093
(
2013
).
6.
H. K.
Nguyen
,
M.
Ito
,
S.
Fujinami
, and
K.
Nakajima
,
Macromolecules
47
,
7971
(
2014
).
7.
S. G.
Shroff
,
D. R.
Saner
, and
R.
Lal
,
Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol.
269
,
C286
(
1995
).
8.
G.
Binnig
,
C.
Gerber
,
E.
Stoll
,
R. T.
Albrecht
, and
C. F.
Quate
,
Europhys. Lett.
3
,
1281
(
1987
).
9.
R. E.
Mahaffy
,
C. K.
Shih
,
F. C.
MacKintosh
, and
J.
Käs
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
85
,
880
(
2000
).
10.
J.
Alcaraz
,
L.
Buscemi
,
M.
Puig-de-Morales
,
J.
Colchero
,
A.
Baró
, and
D.
Navajas
,
Langmuir
18
,
716
(
2002
).
11.
J.
Alcaraz
,
L.
Buscemi
,
M.
Grabulosa
,
X.
Trepat
,
B.
Fabry
,
R.
Farré
, and
D.
Navajas
,
Biophys. J.
84
,
2071
(
2003
).
12.
J.
Rother
,
H.
Nöding
,
I.
Mey
, and
A.
Janshoff
,
Open Biol.
4
,
140046
(
2014
).
13.
R.
Takahashi
and
T.
Okajima
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
,
173702
(
2015
).
14.
P.
Cai
,
R.
Takahashi
,
K.
Kuribayashi-Shigetomi
,
A.
Subagyo
,
K.
Sueoka
,
J. M.
Maloney
,
K. J.
Van Vliet
, and
T.
Okajima
,
Biophys. J.
113
,
671
(
2017
).
15.
A.
Rigato
,
A.
Miyagi
,
S.
Scheuring
, and
F.
Rico
,
Nat. Phys.
13
,
771
(
2017
).
16.
C.
Braunsmann
and
T. E.
Schäffer
,
Nanotechnology
21
,
225705
(
2010
).
17.
C.
Braunsmann
,
J.
Seifert
,
J.
Rheinlaender
, and
T. E.
Schäffer
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
85
,
073703
(
2014
).
18.
S.
Jesse
,
S. V.
Kalinin
,
P.
Roger
,
A. P.
Baddorf
, and
B. J.
Rodriguez
,
Nanotechnology
18
,
435503
(
2007
).
19.
S.
Jesse
and
S. V.
Kalinin
,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
44
,
464006
(
2011
).
20.
M.
Stark
,
R.
Guckenberger
,
A.
Stemmer
, and
R. W.
Stark
,
J. Appl. Phys.
98
,
114904
(
2005
).
21.
J. J.
Fredberg
and
D.
Stamenovic
,
J. Appl. Physiol.
67
,
2408
(
1989
).
22.
F. M.
Hecht
,
J.
Rheinlaender
,
N.
Schierbaum
,
W. H.
Goldmann
,
B.
Fabry
, and
T. E.
Schäffer
,
Soft Matter
11
,
4584
(
2015
).
23.
M.
Balland
,
N.
Desprat
,
D.
Icard
,
S.
Féréol
,
A.
Asnacios
,
J.
Browaeys
,
S.
Hénon
, and
F.
Gallet
,
Phys. Rev. E
74
,
021911
(
2006
).
24.
R.
Takahashi
and
T.
Okajima
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
55
,
08NB22
(
2016
).
25.
B.
Fabry
,
G. N.
Maksym
,
J. P.
Butler
,
M.
Glogauer
,
D.
Navajas
,
N. A.
Taback
,
E. J.
Millet
, and
J. J.
Fredberg
,
Phys. Rev. E
68
,
041914
(
2003
).

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.