Electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) are of increasing importance in energy storage from renewable sources. The properties of the electrode and electrolyte materials influence the energy and power densities of EDLCs. We examined the specific capacitance and ion dynamics of a protic ionic liquid confined in pre-intercalated Ti3C2Tx MXene. Our electrochemical measurements demonstrated that the creation of a protic ionic liquid, 1-butyl-3-H-imidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (BuIMH-NTf2), using a mixture of ionic liquid, 1-butyl imidazole (BuIM), and salt, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (HNTf2), in a ratio of 0.8:0.2 led to the optimal capacitance. Remarkably, quasi-elastic neutron scattering measurements revealed increased particle mobility at this composition, attributed to the more efficient accumulation of BuIMH+ on the electrode surface. This deposit of additional ions results in fewer BuIM molecules away from the surface, enhancing their mobility due to reduced crowding. This composition-dependent electrochemical behavior will guide the formulation of more efficient protic ionic liquid systems, enabling faster ion transport in energy storage devices.

Improving energy storage devices such as batteries and electrochemical supercapacitors is crucial to reducing our dependence on fossil fuel-based energy. While supercapacitors typically have lower specific energy than batteries, they have the advantage of fast charging and discharging times, which gives them excellent specific power.1,2 Therefore, it is essential to engineer supercapacitors with high specific energy and power for various applications, such as transportation and grid energy storage.3 The capacitor’s energy density (E) can be calculated using the equation E = ½ CV2 where C is the specific capacitance, a property of electrode materials, and V is the operational voltage window, determined by the properties of electrolytes. Increasing the specific capacitance and voltage window is essential to unlocking high specific energy in supercapacitors.

MXenes are transition metal carbides and/or nitrides, first discovered in 2011, which have many properties that make them attractive electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage devices.4,5 They are electrically conductive and rich with surface functional groups, therefore allowing tunable chemistries and the ability to host many ions.6 MXenes have already shown great promise as supercapacitor electrodes in aqueous systems.7 It was found that nanoengineered8 and pre-intercalated9 Ti3C2Tx achieve a higher capacitance in sulfuric acid electrolytes. Unfortunately, the narrow breakdown voltage window of water limits the overall capacitance and, thus, the specific energy of aqueous supercapacitors. The utilization of MXenes in non-aqueous electrolytes, including room-temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) electrolytes with high operational voltage windows,10 has been minimal. A study to intercalate RTILs between MXene layers showed that, similar to the MXene aqueous system where water molecules reside in the inter-stack gaps,11 the ionic liquid ions do not intercalate between the MXene layers.12 Instead, it gets trapped in the larger-sized MXene inter-stack gaps. It has been concluded that the d-spacing in typical MXenes is not wide enough for the ions of an ionic liquid, which are too large to intercalate. Even under applied potential, ionic liquid ions did not intercalate between the layer, both in pristine and in the presence of acetonitrile in different concentrations. However, an enhancement in specific capacitance in the presence of 25% acetonitrile has been reported.13 Therefore, in one of our previous studies, we pre-intercalated MXene with alkylammonium (AA) cations with alkyl chains containing 6 (C6) to 16 (C16) carbon atoms. Pre-intercalated MXene with 12 (C12) carbon atoms in the alkyl chain (referred to as Ti3C2Tx-C12), with an interlayer spacing of ∼2.2 nm, allowed for RTIL cation electrochemical intercalation.14 As a result, it showed a significant improvement in electrochemical behavior both in a neat 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (EMIMTFSI) and in a 1M EMIMTFSI in acetonitrile, with the localized motion of the ionic liquid ions in confinement.14 

Although they have a large operational voltage window, aprotic ionic liquids struggle to form solvation shells and stabilize ions.15,16 Meanwhile, protic ionic liquids, which have a considerable stability window and labile protons, have superior capacitive reactions compared to the large bulky cations of the aprotic ionic liquids.17 Furthermore, protic ionic liquids can add aqueous solution-like conductivity and other advantageous characteristics of ionic liquids to energy storage applications,18 where the ion transfer mechanism plays a significant role. Two different transport mechanisms, the vehicle mechanism, which is a slow diffusion-controlled process, and a Grotthuss hopping mechanism of fast transport, have been suggested for systems involving ionic liquids.19,20 In a protic ionic liquid with a labile proton that can be transferred easily, the Grotthuss-like mechanism of structural diffusion results in higher conductivity. Higher ionic conductivity observed in phosphoric acid, which has labile protons, has been found to demonstrate a hopping mechanism of fast proton transport.21 Therefore, protic ionic liquids have the potential to serve as an electrolyte for fast ion transfer. One way to catalyze the proton hopping behavior in an ionic liquid is by using cations with more than one basic site. Having more basic sites allows more spots for proton transfer and favors such a mechanism over the slower matrix-assisted transport. A second consideration is synthesizing protic ionic liquid electrolytes by maximizing fluidity, particularly by exploiting different mixtures involving ionic liquids and salts.22 Here, we have examined the electrochemical performance together with ions dynamics of the protic ionic liquid formed using different compositions of BuIM and HNTf2 (Scheme 1) confined in Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene. Using cyclic voltammetry together with quasi-elastic neutron scattering, we have found an optimal electrolyte ratio of 1-butyl imidazole (BuIM): bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (HNTf2) of 0.8:0.2 at which the Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene electrode system provides the optimal specific capacitance. This higher capacitance comes from accumulating larger numbers of BuIMH+ on the surface of the electrodes, thereby giving more room for the solvent molecules to move in the space away from the surface, as revealed from the higher diffusivity obtained from the dynamics measurements.

SCHEME 1.

Preparation of protic ionic liquids.

SCHEME 1.

Preparation of protic ionic liquids.

Close modal

We started by examining the protic ionic liquid’s capacitive behavior, which was calculated using the coarse-grained molecular model as detailed in Ref. 23. The normalized differential capacitance of the protic ionic liquid confined in a 2 nm slit pore as a function of the protic ionic liquid, BuIM, concentration is presented in Fig. 1. There is a maximum capacitance (four times more than pure ionic liquid) at 80 mol % of BuIM in its mixture with HNTf2, suggesting the significant impact of the composition of the protic ionic liquid on electrochemical performance. Using a coarse grain model, Gallegos and Wu have attributed such concentration-dependent capacitance maximum to the interplay between the solvent molecules (BuIM), coions (BuIMH+), and counterions (NTf2) in the mixture.23 They predicted a significant change in the number of BuIm molecules, resulting in maximum differential adsorption of the counterions inside the pore when 20 mol % of HNTf2 is present. Based on their calculations, they concluded that at this particular composition, an optimal balance results from a trade-off between the higher number density of ions and the non-electrostatic repulsion among ions (cation and anion).

FIG. 1.

Protic ionic liquid concentration-dependent differential capacitance normalized to the 50:50 mixture in the absence of charge within a slit pore of 2 nm. Data were extracted and replotted from Ref. 23.

FIG. 1.

Protic ionic liquid concentration-dependent differential capacitance normalized to the 50:50 mixture in the absence of charge within a slit pore of 2 nm. Data were extracted and replotted from Ref. 23.

Close modal

We evaluated the electrochemical performance of Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene (material characterization details in Fig. S1 of the supplementary material) in electrolytes with different BuIM:HNTf2 ratios (details regarding electrode and electrolyte preparation are presented in the supplementary material). Figure S2 presents cyclic voltammograms (CVs) at the scan rates of 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mV/s for pre-intercalated Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene at BuIM:HNTf2 molar ratios of 0.9:0.1, 0.8:0.2, 0.5:0.5, and 0.2:0.8. The CVs for 0.9:0.1 BuIM:HNTf2 electrolytes [Fig. S2(a)] exhibit a resistive behavior with negligible capacitance even at a low scan rate of 1 mV/s. As shown in Fig. S2(b), a significant improvement in the electrochemical performance was noticed by changing the ratio to 0.8:0.2 BuIM:HNTf2. A specific capacitance of ∼154 F/g was measured at 1 mV/s. Fitting the relationship between CV’s current (ip) and sweep rate (v) according to the power law ip = avb, where a and b are constants, results in b values ∼0.52 for 0.8:0.2 BuIM:HNTf2, suggesting that a semi-infinite diffusion-controlled step is the rate-limiting step. By increasing the HNTf2 content to a ratio of 0.5:0.5 BuIM:HNTf2 [Fig. S2(c)], a significant drop in the capacitance was noticed with a specific capacitance of ∼28 F/g. This capacitance did not change noticeably by further increasing the HNTf2 content to 0.2:0.8 BuIM:HNTf2 even though the shape of the CV changed [Fig. S2(d)]. The b values were found to be ∼0.68 for 0.5:0.5 and ∼0.64 for 0.2:0.8 BuIM:HNTf2, indicating the existence of a surface-controlled limiting step in addition to diffusion-controlled. The capacitance results are shown in Fig. 2. The higher capacitance for the 0.8:0.2 BuIM:HNTf2 (normalized to the capacitance obtained from the 0.5:0.5 mixture at 1 mV/s) indicates that many of the ions from the protic ionic liquid are attached to the surfaces of the Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene electrode in this composition. This composition, which gave a maximum capacitance in electrochemical measurements, is consistent with the normalized differential capacitance presented in Fig. 1 without applied voltage. Although the specific capacitance drops significantly at higher scan rates, the 0.8:0.2 composition still yields a higher capacitance even at higher scan rates among all the compositions. This observation indicates that there is a loss of cations with a corresponding gain in the number of anions when the scan rates increase, leading to a decrease in the electrochemical performance as predicted by classical density functional theory (cDFT).23 

FIG. 2.

Specific capacitance normalized to the capacitance obtained from 50:50 mixture at 1 mV/s obtained using the Ti3C2Tx-C12 electrode and protic ionic liquid at different ratios of BuIM:HNTf2 at various scan rates.

FIG. 2.

Specific capacitance normalized to the capacitance obtained from 50:50 mixture at 1 mV/s obtained using the Ti3C2Tx-C12 electrode and protic ionic liquid at different ratios of BuIM:HNTf2 at various scan rates.

Close modal

CDFT also predicted a higher capacitance in a system with a larger pore size. Analogously to our previous experiment,14 where Ti3C2Tx-C12 with a d-spacing of 2.2 nm resulted in a higher capacitance while using 1M EMIMTFSI in acetonitrile solution, we believe that the combined effect of the layering of the ions together with the large d-spacing of the MXene results in the higher capacitance at 0.8:0.2 composition of BuIM:HNTf2. The CVs for all four electrolyte compositions studied are shown in Fig. S2. All the compositions had a similar voltage window, from −0.7 to 0.7 V vs Ag wire. The 0.9:0.1 ratio mixture [Fig. S2(a)] showed very poor capacitance and high resistivity. The 0.5:0.5 and 0.2:0.8 electrolyte ratios showed similar values for capacitance at all scan rates (Fig. 2), but the shapes of the CVs are quite different. The CV shape of the 0.5:0.5 ratio [Fig. S2(c)] suggests that it is primarily double layer capacitance, while the 0.2:0.8 ratio [Fig. S2(d)] does have a redox peak visible at 0.1 V vs Ag wire during the charging portion of the CV, but the peak during the discharging is not very prominent. The optimal ratio, 0.8:0.2, has a redox peak at −0.2 V vs Ag wire during charging, but the peak during discharge is less prominent and appears at −0.1 V. These redox peaks suggest that the protic ionic liquid electrolyte is able to participate in redox as well as double layer capacitance. To understand the mechanism of higher capacitance at this BuIM:HNTf2 = 0.8:0.2 composition, we performed energy-resolved elastic and quasi-elastic neutron scattering experiments using the high flux backscattering (HFBS)24 and backscattering silicon (BASIS)25 spectrometers, respectively.

Figures 3(a) and 3(b) display the mean square displacements (MSDs) (more details in the supplementary material) obtained using energy-resolved elastic neutron scattering from the ionic liquid BuIM in bulk and confined states (pristine and its mixture with HNTf2), respectively. The MSD, ⟨u2⟩, of scattering particles was obtained from the Q-dependence of elastic scattering measured as a function of temperature using the fixed window scan. This Q-dependence of the elastic incoherent scattering can be related to ⟨u2⟩ as I(T=T)I(T=4K)=expQ23u2, where the left-hand side of the equation is the elastic intensity at a given temperature (T) normalized to the intensity at the lowest temperature measured. In our case, the lowest temperature was 4 K. The MSD is calculated from the line slope obtained after plotting the natural logarithm of the normalized intensity vs Q2. In a harmonic system, the Q-dependence of ⟨u2⟩ with temperature is approximated with the Debye–Waller factor arising due to thermal vibration, giving a monotonic decay of the intensity as a function of temperature.26 When the time scale of the scattering particle’s motion is faster than that of the instrument’s resolution, a deviation from linearity arises, both in elastic intensity and in MSD as a function of temperature. The MSD of the pristine BuIM is much larger than in mixtures. Mixing HNTf2 (salt) in BuIM lowers the MSD of the liquid. There is a systematic decrease in MSD when the salt concentration is increased [Fig. 3(a)]. This reduction in MSD is attributed to a possible complex formation between the ionic liquid and the salt. This decrease becomes much smaller when the concentration of BuIM reaches 50% and lower. At a certain concentration level, when there is an equilibrium between HNTf2 and the two other ionic species, BuIMH+ and NTf2, further addition of HNTf2 does not contribute much to reducing the MSD of the protic ionic liquid. However, when those mixtures are confined in Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene, the MSD obtained from the mixture with 80% of BuIM is the highest compared to all the other compositions, where the MSDs are nearly the same [Fig. 3(b)]. This higher mobility is also reflected in the diffusion coefficients extracted from the QENS measurements. The half-width at half maxima (HWHM) obtained from the QENS spectra [Figs. S3(a) and S3(b)] of 0.8:0.2 (BuIM:HNTf2) mixture are higher compared to all other compositions, both at 300 K [Fig. 4(a)] and at 360 K [Fig. 4(b)].

FIG. 3.

Normalized mean square displacement (MSD) obtained from the elastic neutron scattering intensity as a function of temperature (a) from bulk pure imidazole and its mixture with a salt (HNTf2) at various concentrations and (b) from the mixture solutions confined in Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene.

FIG. 3.

Normalized mean square displacement (MSD) obtained from the elastic neutron scattering intensity as a function of temperature (a) from bulk pure imidazole and its mixture with a salt (HNTf2) at various concentrations and (b) from the mixture solutions confined in Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Q-dependence of HWHM of QENS spectra of the confined mixture solutions with the square of the momentum transfer at (a) 300 K and (b) 360 K. (c) and (d) Corresponding dependence of cation diffusivities at the indicated mixture compositions.

FIG. 4.

Q-dependence of HWHM of QENS spectra of the confined mixture solutions with the square of the momentum transfer at (a) 300 K and (b) 360 K. (c) and (d) Corresponding dependence of cation diffusivities at the indicated mixture compositions.

Close modal

The diffusion coefficients obtained from a simple Fickian model give the maximum value [Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)] at this 0.8:0.2 (BuIM:HNTf2) composition at both the measured temperatures. Similarly, besides the current protic ionic liquid system, a higher diffusivity at 0.8:0.2 (BuIM:HNTf2) ratio of two different aprotic ionic liquid mixtures in confinement has been reported.27 In that ionic liquid system, the higher diffusivity of the cation was attributed to the structural modification of the ions at the surface of the matrix (onion-like carbon) due to the replacement of a larger anion by a smaller one, resulting in excess adsorption of cation on the surface. This excess adsorption allows other cations to move away from the surface in the less crowded environment, thus exhibiting a higher diffusivity. When more cations are attached to the surface of the matrix, a higher elastic incoherent scattering fraction (EISF) is obtained. However, in a 0.8:0.2 (BuIM:HNTf2) mixture system, even though the diffusivity is higher at this composition in confinement, the EISF (Fig. S4) decreases gradually as the concentration of BuIM is decreased in the mixture, without showing a maximum. This decrease in EISF must be due to the progressive displacement of the cations from the MXene surface with the addition of salt. So, when more salt is in the electrolyte, more cations go off the walls (hence a smaller EISF). Since the MXene surface is rich with surface functional groups,28 we anticipate the formation of an electrical double layer (EDL), as illustrated by cDFT under applied potential, on its surface.23 Furthermore, the density functional theory (DFT) also suggests that the presence of confined BuIM molecules in pores changes significantly at 20 mol % HNTf2.23 Therefore, the formation of EDL, comprising NTf2 counterions and BuIMH+ coions, results in fewer BuIM molecules away from the surfaces, which exhibit a higher diffusivity. However, there is a monotonic decrease in EISF, with no maximum at 0.8:0.2 (BuIM:HNTf2) composition in the confined system. Even though it requires further investigation, the lower EISF observed in the current study is associated not with lower diffusivity in the middle of the pores (as it usually is) but with higher diffusivity in the middle. This unusual behavior can be attributed to the interactions between these three chemical species and the solvent molecules (BuIM), which progressively decrease the number of immobile hydrogen-bearing species on the surface of the MXene, resulting in a BuIM concentration-dependent EISF. However, the effect of temperature on the EISF [Fig. S4(b)] is larger when the composition is higher in BuIM, suggesting the presence of more immobile ions when the BuIM remains as a solvent. Note that the QENS spectra [Fig. S5(a)] of the pristine Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene also show some temperature-dependent quasi-elastic broadening. The HWHM of the peaks at 300 and 360 K are found to be Q-independent [Fig. S5(b)], which means that we are probing the localized motion of the tetradodecylammonium salt, which was used as an intercalant in this Ti3C2Tx MXene.

In summary, we have probed the microscopic dynamics and the electrochemical performance of a protic ionic liquid confined in pre-intercalated Ti3C2Tx-C12 MXene employing quasi-elastic neutron scattering and electrochemical measurements. We found an optimal composition of an ionic liquid, BuIM, with a salt, HNTf2, in the ratio of 0.8:0.2 (BuIM:HNTf2), giving an enhanced capacitance and a higher diffusivity. The higher capacitance results from the accumulation of more of the BuIMH+ on the surface of the MXene electrode, replacing more of the solvent (BuIM) molecules. This replacement provides more freedom for BuIM molecules to move due to the conversion of more of the solvent molecules to protic ionic liquid. This study’s findings will help design electrolyte systems involving ionic liquids and salts forming protic ionic liquids, resulting in fast ion transport while using pre-intercalated MXene as an electrode in the supercapacitor configuration.

The supplementary material includes material synthesis, experimental details (x-ray scattering, electrochemical measurements, and quasi-elastic neutron scattering), XRD patterns, cyclic voltammograms, and QENS data analysis.

This work was supported as part of the Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. Work at ORNL’s Spallation Neutron Source was sponsored by the Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for U.S. DOE under Contract No. DEAC05-00OR22725. The beam time was allocated to BASIS on Proposal No. IPTS-26212. This research used the resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. QClimax is a part of the Integrated Computational Environment Modeling and Analysis of Neutron Data (ICE-MAN) (LDRD 8237) project, funded by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at ORNL. B.P.T. was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. Access to the HFBS was provided by the Center for High-Resolution Neutron Scattering, a partnership between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Science Foundation under Agreement No. DMR-2010792.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

N.C.O. and K.L. contributed equally to this paper.

Naresh C. Osti: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Kun Liang: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Kaitlyn Prenger: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Bishnu P. Thapaliya: Methodology (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Madhusudan Tyagi: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Sheng Dai: Methodology (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Michael Naguib: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Eugene Mamontov: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
M.
Winter
and
R. J.
Brodd
,
Chem. Rev.
104
,
4245
4269
(
2004
).
2.
P.
Simon
and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Nat. Mater.
7
,
845
854
(
2008
).
3.
S.
Vazquez
,
S. M.
Lukic
,
E.
Galvan
,
L. G.
Franquelo
, and
J. M.
Carrasco
,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
57
,
3881
3895
(
2010
).
4.
M.
Naguib
,
M.
Kurtoglu
,
V.
Presser
,
J.
Lu
,
J.
Niu
,
M.
Heon
,
L.
Hultman
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
M. W.
Barsoum
,
Adv. Mater.
23
,
4248
4253
(
2011
).
5.
J. B.
Pang
,
R. G.
Mendes
,
A.
Bachmatiuk
,
L.
Zhao
,
H. Q.
Ta
,
T.
Gemming
,
H.
Liu
,
Z. F.
Liu
, and
M. H.
Rummeli
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
48
,
72
133
(
2019
).
6.
J.
Xu
,
T.
Peng
,
X.
Qin
,
Q.
Zhang
,
T.
Liu
,
W.
Dai
,
B.
Chen
,
H.
Yu
, and
S.
Shi
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
9
,
14147
(
2021
).
7.
M. R.
Lukatskaya
,
O.
Mashtalir
,
C. E.
Ren
,
Y.
Dall’Agnese
,
P.
Rozier
,
P. L.
Taberna
,
M.
Naguib
,
P.
Simon
,
M. W.
Barsoum
, and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Science
341
,
1502
1505
(
2013
).
8.
M. R.
Lukatskaya
,
S.
Kota
,
Z. F.
Lin
,
M. Q.
Zhao
,
N.
Shpigel
,
M. D.
Levi
,
J.
Halim
,
P. L.
Taberna
,
M.
Barsoum
,
P.
Simon
, and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Nat. Energy
2
,
17105
(
2017
).
9.
K.
Prenger
,
Y. G. L.
Sun
,
K.
Ganeshan
,
A.
Al-Temimy
,
K.
Liang
,
C.
Dun
,
J. J.
Urban
,
J.
Xiao
,
T.
Petit
,
A. C. T.
van Duin
,
D. E.
Jiang
, and
M.
Naguib
,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
5
,
9373
9382
(
2022
).
10.
M.
Armand
,
F.
Endres
,
D. R.
MacFarlane
,
H.
Ohno
, and
B.
Scrosati
,
Nat. Mater.
8
,
621
629
(
2009
).
11.
N. C.
Osti
,
M.
Naguib
,
A.
Ostadhossein
,
Y.
Xie
,
P. R. C.
Kent
,
B.
Dyatkin
,
G.
Rother
,
W. T.
Heller
,
A. C. T.
van Duin
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
E.
Mamontov
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
8
,
8859
8863
(
2016
).
12.
N. C.
Osti
,
M. W.
Thompson
,
K. L.
Van Aken
,
M.
Alhabeb
,
M.
Tyagi
,
J. K.
Keum
,
P. T.
Cummings
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
E.
Mamontov
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
122
,
27561
27566
(
2018
).
13.
N. C.
Osti
,
X. B.
Lin
,
W.
Zhao
,
X. H.
Wang
,
C. F.
Chen
,
Y.
Gao
,
T.
Torita
,
A. I.
Kolesnikov
,
P. T.
Cummings
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
E.
Mamontov
,
2D Mater.
10
,
014014
(
2023
).
14.
K.
Liang
,
R. A.
Matsumoto
,
W.
Zhao
,
N. C.
Osti
,
I.
Popov
,
B. P.
Thapaliya
,
S.
Fleischmann
,
S.
Misra
,
K.
Prenger
,
M.
Tyagi
,
E.
Mamontov
,
V.
Augustyn
,
R. R.
Unocic
,
A. P.
Sokolov
,
S.
Dai
,
P. T.
Cummings
, and
M.
Naguib
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
31
,
2104007
(
2021
).
15.
K.
Fumino
,
A.
Wulf
, and
R.
Ludwig
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
48
,
3184
3186
(
2009
).
16.
R.
Hayes
,
G. G.
Warr
, and
R.
Atkin
,
Chem. Rev.
115
,
6357
6426
(
2015
).
17.
T. L.
Greaves
and
C. J.
Drummond
,
Chem. Rev.
108
,
206
237
(
2008
).
18.
T.
Stettner
and
A.
Balducci
,
Energy Storage Mater.
40
,
402
414
(
2021
).
19.
S.
Lindberg
,
S.
Jeschke
,
P.
Jankowski
,
M.
Abdelhamid
,
T.
Brousse
,
J.
Le Bideau
,
P.
Johansson
, and
A.
Matic
,
J. Power Sources
460
,
228111
(
2020
).
20.
E.
Jónsson
,
Energy Storage Mater.
25
,
827
835
(
2020
).
21.
I.
Popov
,
Z. H.
Zhu
,
A. R.
Young-Gonzales
,
R. L.
Sacci
,
E.
Mamontov
,
C.
Gainaru
,
S. J.
Paddison
, and
A. P.
Sokolov
,
Commun. Chem.
6
,
77
(
2023
).
22.
A.
Noda
,
A. B.
Susan
,
K.
Kudo
,
S.
Mitsushima
,
K.
Hayamizu
, and
M.
Watanabe
,
J. Phys. Chem. B
107
,
4024
4033
(
2003
).
23.
A.
Gallegos
and
J. Z.
Wu
,
J. Mol. Liq.
365
,
120161
(
2022
).
24.
A.
Meyer
,
R.
Dimeo
,
P.
Gehring
, and
D.
Neumann
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
74
,
2759
2777
(
2003
).
25.
E.
Mamontov
and
K. W.
Herwig
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
82
,
085109
(
2011
).
26.
M.
Bee
,
Quasielastic Neutron Scattering: Principles and Applications in Solid State Chemistry, Biology, and Materials Science
(
Adam Hilger
,
Bristol
,
1998
).
27.
N. C.
Osti
,
A.
Gallegos
,
B.
Dyatkin
,
J. Z.
Wu
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
E.
Mamontov
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
122
,
10476
10481
(
2018
).
28.
M.
Naguib
,
V. N.
Mochalin
,
M. W.
Barsoum
, and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Adv. Mater.
26
,
992
1005
(
2014
).