Newly emerged Janus materials showed the vast potential for catalysis and photocatalysis owing to their multifunctional properties, attracting attention as next-generation functional materials. This Review focuses on various synthesis processes for developing a novel class of Janus materials for applications in electrocatalysis and photo-electrocatalysis via water electrolysis. Starting with summarizing the different designs and preparation of Janus particles, this Review analyzed the compositions and categories of Janus materials. Furthermore, this Review discusses various synthesis processes of Janus materials, followed by classifications of different synthesis routes for Janus materials with a detailed review of the respective process parameters, multifunctional properties, and present status of their development. This Review also summarizes the comprehensive properties of the Janus material, subjected to their applications toward catalytic hydrogen evolution reactions, oxygen evolution reactions, and photo-electrocatalysis. Finally, a thorough summary is presented on the synthesis and applications of Janus particle, while the respective challenges and outlooks are also discussed.

Janus particles (JPs) are named after the Roman two-faced God of the same name. The Nobel laureate Pierre-Gilles de Gennes first coined the term in his Nobel Laureate speech called Soft Matter,1 describing Janus particles as having two sides, one polar and the other apolar. Since then, the term Janus has transcended its original amphiphilic definition to be regarded as particles composed of two or more components that differ in chemical or physical properties and are often antipodal.2–4 The individual components of each JP are present in a single particle, and those individual components retain their properties that are seldom altered, thus allowing these particles to exhibit the unique multifunctional properties of each constituent.5 Such differences in properties are not only limited to electrical,6 chemical,7 magnetic,8 or optical9 properties; however, they broadly extend toward other functional properties, such as catalysis, electrocatalysis, and so on. The asymmetric nature of the particle surface, known as Janus balance, is the ratio of the surface area devoted to the types of different surfaces, which can vary from half-and-half hemispheres to interspaced small patches.10 It has been established that materials with asymmetric structures and anisotropic properties can bring considerable advantages toward bi-functional and multi-functional catalysis.11 Specifically, the amphiphilic (having both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties) properties of JPs have accumulated much attention for being used as functional materials. Over the last few years, numerous Janus particles have been developed to use them as electro-catalysts in the catalytic splitting of water. Such catalysts should have a low over potential, high stability, low Tafel slope, and high Faradic efficiency, where Janus particles perfectly fit the above criteria.

Hydrogen has been addressed as one of the promising green alternatives to our energy needs, as hydrogen shows credible solutions to climate change and other related issues. Being a clean fuel, hydrogen and its production and use do not produce any greenhouse gases, and the by-product of the hydrogen fuel is carbon-free. Moreover, among all the available fuels, hydrogen has the highest gravimetric energy density12 and is easy to use. Coal gasification, steam reforming, and water electrolysis are readily available technologies to produce hydrogen. Other hydrogen production methods, such as reforming sugar and ethanol, water bio-photolysis, and photochemical splitting of water, are still in the developmental stage. With renewable energy taking the forefront, the electrocatalytic production of hydrogen via water splitting has already been in the limelight.13 However, during the splitting of water, it is required to provide additional energy to overcome the energy barrier known as dynamic over potential; thus, we need catalysts to minimize the electrocatalysis’s overpotential, making the process economically feasible.14 Specifically, overall water splitting is in demand where bi-functional catalysts could play a significant role in improving efficiency by simultaneously proceeding with electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions (HERs) and oxygen evolution reactions (OERs).

Over the past few decades, several materials have been developed for water electrolysis, including zero-, one-, two-, and three-dimensional materials and combinations of two or more of these materials.15–20 It is observed that some nanomaterials with an asymmetric heterostructured junction can produce remarkable properties, which cannot be realized in homogeneous or symmetric nano-scale materials.21,22 To this end, with their multi-functionality, JPs come up as suitable contenders. It has been established that catalysts with an asymmetric structure and properties can bring considerable advantages in overall water electrolysis.11 In this regard, the amphiphilic nature of the JPs has garnered much attention, particularly for water electrolysis. Over the last few years, numerous Janus particles have been synthesized to use them as electro-catalysts for water splitting. These Janus catalysts exhibit close-to-zero overpotential, remarkable stability, lower Tafel slope, and extraordinary Faradic efficiency and are economically feasible for their scalability.

In this paper, we focus on systematically reviewing the status of the developments of Janus materials for electrocatalysis and photo-electrocatalysis. Starting with summarizing the different designs and preparation of Janus particles, we have discussed the compositions and types of Janus materials (such as polymeric Janus materials, inorganic Janus materials, and polymeric/inorganic hybrid Janus materials). After that, the synthesis processes of Janus materials were cited, followed by classifications of different approaches to synthesize them with a detailed review of the respective process parameters, multifunctional properties, and present status of their development. In addition, such comprehensive properties of the Janus particles are summarized in this Review, subjected to their applications towards catalytic hydrogen evolution reactions (HERs), oxygen evolution reactions (OERs), and photo-electrocatalysis. Finally, a thorough summary is presented on the synthesis and applications of Janus particle, while the respective challenges and outlooks are also discussed.

Generally, the structure and the composition of a Janus particle (JP) synergistically determine the particle’s properties. Hence, to build Janus materials, structural complexities are a prerequisite, along with diverse compositional configurations.23,24 For instance, it was observed that dumbbell-shaped JPs have a greater surfactancy than their spherical counterparts. It was hypothesized that the jamming of the dumbbell-shaped particles at the interface in time scales smaller than the droplet’s relaxation time, which leads to the tendency of these particles to the covering of the interface with closed-packed arrangements, thereby leading to the stabilization of these emulsion droplets that are non-spherical in morphology.25 

To date, numerous morphologies of different JPs have been reported, including spheres,26–29 disks,30 rods,31 dumb-bells,25,32 snowman,33 sheets,34 raspberry,35 and many more. Typically, some commonly found morphologies of JPs are shown in Fig. 1.

FIG. 1.

Some examples of Janus particles varying with different morphologies. (A) Spherical particles. Adapted with permission from Ouchi et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58(46), 20996 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (B) Disk-shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Walther et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(19), 6187 (2007). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C) Snowman shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Yin et al., J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 49(15), 3272 (2011). Copyright 2011 John Wiley and Sons. (D) Nano-sheet shaped structures. Adapted with permission from Liang et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50(10), 2379 (2011). Copyright 2011 John Wiley and Sons. (E) Rod- and cylinder-shaped particles (scale bar 20 µm). Adapted with permission from Bhaskar et al., Small 6(3), 404 (2010). Copyright 2010 John Wiley and Sons. (F) Hairy hybrid-type particles. Adapted with permission from Kirillova et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(38), 21218 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.48 (G) Dumbbell shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 56(29), 8459 (2017). Copyright 2017 John Wiley and Sons. (H) Raspberry shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Deng et al., Macromolecules 48(3), 750 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (I) Bonsai shaped particles (scale bar 40 nm). Adapted with permission from Qu et al., Langmuir 33(21), 5269 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 1.

Some examples of Janus particles varying with different morphologies. (A) Spherical particles. Adapted with permission from Ouchi et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58(46), 20996 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (B) Disk-shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Walther et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(19), 6187 (2007). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C) Snowman shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Yin et al., J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 49(15), 3272 (2011). Copyright 2011 John Wiley and Sons. (D) Nano-sheet shaped structures. Adapted with permission from Liang et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50(10), 2379 (2011). Copyright 2011 John Wiley and Sons. (E) Rod- and cylinder-shaped particles (scale bar 20 µm). Adapted with permission from Bhaskar et al., Small 6(3), 404 (2010). Copyright 2010 John Wiley and Sons. (F) Hairy hybrid-type particles. Adapted with permission from Kirillova et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(38), 21218 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.48 (G) Dumbbell shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 56(29), 8459 (2017). Copyright 2017 John Wiley and Sons. (H) Raspberry shaped particles. Adapted with permission from Deng et al., Macromolecules 48(3), 750 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (I) Bonsai shaped particles (scale bar 40 nm). Adapted with permission from Qu et al., Langmuir 33(21), 5269 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

It is already revealed that a JP’s morphology and chemical composition portray its applications and properties. Not only Janus particles are limited to the complex morphologies, but also the individual components in the particle retain their intrinsic properties (i.e., optical, magnetic, and electronic). As a consequence of the amalgamation of different components, JPs are bestowed with the unique capability to integrate antipodal components and utilize the properties of all the individual constituent components. Moreover, depending on the applications, the properties of the JPs can be altered. For instance, we can combine two opposite characteristics of hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity in the same JPs, as reported in many recent works.36 Janus particles are also used for delivering catalysts to specific phases as phase transfer vehicles.37,38 We can also achieve extraordinary catalytic activity by combining two or more components with extraordinary catalytic properties. For instance, metal–semiconductor hybrid catalysts can be fabricated for applications in photocatalysis, energy devices, and solar energy conversions.39 Janus particles are used for stabilizing Pickering emulsions and are also employed for interfacial catalysis owing to their enhanced interfacial activities.38,40 In another example, JPs could also have been imparted with specialized properties, such as piezoelectric properties. Janus MXY mono- and multi-layered particles are predicted to have both out-of-plane and in-plane piezo-electric polarization. Based on the first-principles calculations, different piezoelectric Janus materials have been designed with various multifunctional properties.41,42 It was discovered that these JPs have a comparatively high piezoelectric coefficient, and their broken-mirror symmetry was attributed to their out-of-plane piezoelectric polarization. For example, Janus MoSTe has an out-of-plane piezoelectric polarization of 5.7–13.5 pm/V, which is even greater than many common 3D piezoelectric materials.41,43

Most of the studies conducted on Janus materials suggest that the particle sizes of these materials vary from a few hundred nanometers to a few micrometers. No doubt, the synthesis and processing of Janus particles smaller than 100 nm are a challenging and complex issue,44,45 and very few such Janus particles below 100 nm have been reported to date. Zhu et al.46 synthesized three-component CdS–Au2S–Au Janus-satellite heterostructure nanocrystals (HNCs) of an average particle size of 19.8 nm. Schick et al.47 synthesized a highly biocompatible and multifunctional Au@MnO Janus particle of 25 nm. Generally, the morphology and size of a JP can be controlled by the process of its synthesizing parameters, as discussed in detail in Sec. III.

The complexities in Janus materials are not only limited to their morphology and size but also to their compositions, which can be classified as polymeric Janus, inorganic Janus, and polymeric/inorganic Janus, as shown in Fig. 2.51,58 The classifications of various Janus particles based on their compositions are discussed in the following sub-sections.

FIG. 2.

Schematic flowchart showing the types of Janus particles based on their chemical composition.

FIG. 2.

Schematic flowchart showing the types of Janus particles based on their chemical composition.

Close modal

B.1. Polymeric Janus materials

Polymeric Janus materials have attracted much attention in recent years. These particles are entirely composed of long-chain polymers,10 which show excellent performance as catalysts,52 biological and chemical sensors,53 colloidal surfactants,54,55 and so on. Moreover, polymers are soft, and the ease of tailoring their asymmetric structure allows one to control their physicochemical properties.11 Polymeric Janus materials are generally synthesized via the phase separation approach. However, self-assembly and microfluidic strategies are also used for synthesizing polymeric JPs. De Leon et al.56 demonstrated a preparation method based on an asymmetrically functionalized dumbbell-shaped Janus material by a combination of polymers and Pickering emulsion, as shown in Fig. 3(A). Similarly, graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets were assembled on wax beads and (polymethyl methacrylate) PMMA, which was selectively grafted on the exposed face to create such a dumbbell-shaped Janus particle. This provided an amphiphilic characteristic to the Janus particle. The as-fabricated JPs showed a marked improvement in stabilizing the oil–water interface by lowering interfacial tension, which was determined using pendant drop tensiometry of a chloroform drop in water. In addition, such JPs found a relatively more hydrophilic nature of PMMA when compared to chloroform. The incredibly superior interfacial activity was due to its Janus nature, where the PMMA-functionalized phase preferred the chloroform phase and the non-modified face of the Janus nanosheet preferred water. Kim et al.57 employed a seeded polymerization approach using the precursors poly (butyl methacrylate) and polystyrene to fabricate anisotropic dumbbell-shaped Janus particles and established that the chemical anisotropy of non-spherical particles could be achieved by employing surface treatments and using pairs of immiscible polymers, which opened up new avenues for assembling of complex structures and in the long run may even help in tuning the curvature of the various interfaces developed in the anisotropic Janus particles; the synthesis technique is illustrated in Fig. 3(B). Deng et al.49 synthesized an amphiphilic Janus particle with P4VP protuberances on its surface employing the co-assembly approach using the diblock copolymer polystyrene-b-poly(4-vinyl pyridine) (PS-b-P4VP). Their study established that the Janus balance of the nanoparticles (JPs) is tunable by changing the block-chain length ratio of diblock copolymers. The fabrication process is depicted in Fig. 3(C). Tang et al.55 synthesized a Janus polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/PS colloid by seeded emulsion polymerization using precursors polyacrylonitrile and styrene/divinylbenzene. They demonstrated that the composition and the microstructures of the Janus particles can be controlled by selective modification of Janus polymer colloids, as depicted in Fig. 3(D).

FIG. 3.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of PMMA-GO-PMMA and PMMA-GO-X. Reprinted with permission from de Leon et al.,ACS Nano 11(7), 7485 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustrations of synthesis of anisotropic non-spherical dumbbell particles employing the seeded polymerization technique; the bright-field microscopy (BFM) images accompanying it exemplify the synthesis of PS/PBMA dumbbell particles. Reprinted with permission from Kim et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(44), 14374 (2006). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic representation of synthesis of PS-b-P4VP derivative Janus NPs: the markings in the diagram represent (i) the O/W emulsion droplet with the PS-b-P4VP/chloroform as the oil phase and the PVA aqueous solution as the water phase, (ii) patchy particles by emulsion droplet confined the self-assembly of PS-b-P4VP using PVA as a neutral stabilizer, (iii) selective cross-linking of the P4VP protuberances onto the patchy particles, and (iv) Janus NPs derived after a selective disassembly of the patchy particles. Adapted with permission from Deng et al., Macromolecules 48(3), 750 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic illustration of the synthesis method of Janus colloids, where Janus PAN/PS colloids are prepared by a seeded emulsion polymerization process. Adapted with permission from Tang et al., Macromolecules 43(11), 5114 (2010). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 3.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of PMMA-GO-PMMA and PMMA-GO-X. Reprinted with permission from de Leon et al.,ACS Nano 11(7), 7485 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustrations of synthesis of anisotropic non-spherical dumbbell particles employing the seeded polymerization technique; the bright-field microscopy (BFM) images accompanying it exemplify the synthesis of PS/PBMA dumbbell particles. Reprinted with permission from Kim et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(44), 14374 (2006). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic representation of synthesis of PS-b-P4VP derivative Janus NPs: the markings in the diagram represent (i) the O/W emulsion droplet with the PS-b-P4VP/chloroform as the oil phase and the PVA aqueous solution as the water phase, (ii) patchy particles by emulsion droplet confined the self-assembly of PS-b-P4VP using PVA as a neutral stabilizer, (iii) selective cross-linking of the P4VP protuberances onto the patchy particles, and (iv) Janus NPs derived after a selective disassembly of the patchy particles. Adapted with permission from Deng et al., Macromolecules 48(3), 750 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic illustration of the synthesis method of Janus colloids, where Janus PAN/PS colloids are prepared by a seeded emulsion polymerization process. Adapted with permission from Tang et al., Macromolecules 43(11), 5114 (2010). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

B.2. Inorganic Janus materials

Inorganic Janus particles comprise one or more inorganic components, with the advantage of retaining their shapes in various solvents. Thus, JPs can be employed in multiple practical applications, viz., as catalysts in electro and photocatalytic water splitting, in the biomedical field, as sensors, and as drug delivery vehicles (agents).58 There are two subcategories of inorganic Janus particles: (i) Janus particles composed of two or more inorganic constituents and (ii) Janus particles with a single inorganic constituent but different surfaces or other chemical/physical properties.3 Inorganic Janus particles have been reported for their applications in catalysis,59 magnetic,51 and optical applications.60 

Primarily, inorganic Janus nanoparticles are synthesized through different approaches, including the method called surface-controlled nucleation and masking/immobilization, particle synthesis via metal evaporation,9 electrostatic deposition,61 and chemical modifications.3 In addition to the inherent properties of the constituent elements, several new properties are realized from the surface chemistry and the morphology of such newly assembled multi-functional inorganic JPs.62 The difference in surface chemistry due to the combination of two or more elements leads to multi-functionality in JPs, and orthogonal functionalization of the surfaces due to the directed assembly is the most common reason for the change in properties that are observed in Janus particles when compared to their constituent elements.23,47,63 The epitaxial interaction between the two components enhances and sometimes even generates new properties or alters the materials properties altogether. Xuan et al.64 used chemical vapor deposition to synthesize mesoporous Janus nanoparticles, wherein the surface of mesoporous silica particles was deposited with Au. Rowe et al.65 synthesized SiO2-overcoated gold nanorods (GNRs) as inorganic JPs [Fig. 4(A)]. They demonstrated that the size of the SiO2 lobes could be controlled up to a minimum lobe size, below which total encapsulation takes place, as shown in TEM images in Fig. 4A (a-f). It was observed that the alcohol concentration in the reaction mixture leads to the CTAB(cetyltrimethylammonium bromide)-stabilized GNR (CTAB-GNR) core, which is fully encapsulated by the SiO2 shell or Au core is exposed on the sides by the deposition of patchy lobes of SiO2 (Fig. 4A (g-h)). They demonstrated that the morphology of JPs can be tweaked by variations in synthesis parameters [Fig. 4(A)]. McConnell et al.60 synthesized a patchy and optically active multi-region gold on silica as JPs with silica on the bottom, gold patches on the top surface, and gold patches around the center of the particle, as depicted in Fig. 4(B). Such multi-region gold silica JPs were synthesized by employing a unique hierarchical self-assembly process. Inorganic Janus particles can be synthesized into various shapes and sizes. Lyubarskaya and Shestopalov66 reported a method for preparing multi-component, shape-controlled particles. First, they synthesized an array of gold–nickel–titanium structures on an oxidized silicon oxide layer by physical vapor deposition (PVD) and photolithography. These structures were enveloped by a SiO2 layer, which was later patterned by a reactive ion etching. A simple sonication with ethanol removed the exposed gold particles, producing immobilized ordered particle arrays on a flat surface. This pre-arrangement allows for selective patterning, orthogonal functionalization of the surface, and compartmentalization of the Janus particle, as depicted in Fig. 4(C). In the similar fashion, Ma et al.61 synthesized a self-propelled Janus nanomotor by electron beam deposition of a Pt layer (2 nm) on the surface of mesoporous silica nanoparticles, which led to the formation of two faces on the particles. The meso-pores at the non-coated side were still accessible to small molecules, as Pt was deposited on only one side. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images depicted that Pt forms a patchy island-like deposition instead of a smooth layer, which exhibited better catalytic activities for the decomposition of H2O2 into H2O and O2 with the diffusion coefficient value being enhanced by nearly 100% [Fig. 4(D)].

FIG. 4.

(A) Transmission electron micrographs of SiO2-GNRs synthesized using different TEOS concentrations prediluted in anhydrous MeOH.The scale bar in A (a) applies to all panels except the inset in A (f), which shows a zoomed-in image of a lobed SiO2-GNR. Reproduced with permission from Rowe et al., Chem. Mater. 30(18), 6249 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society Publishing. (B) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the multi-regional and patchy Janus particles through the self-assembly of silica particles (230 nm), which were covalently attached to the surface of P(S-r-AA) and subsequently sunk into the polymer film as a function of reaction time. Gold NPs (15 nm) were then electrostatically assembled onto the surface of amine-modified silica particles (230 nm). These hybrid particles were then annealed with and without compatibilizing agents to form the Janus particles. Reproduced with permission from McConnell et al., Nano Lett. 10(2), 603 (2010). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society Publishing. (C) Composition and dimensions of the Janus particles formed from SiO2, TiO2, Ni, and Au, where Ni is sandwiched between Au and SiO2/TiO2. Reproduced with permission from Y. L. Lyubarskaya and A. A. Shestopalov, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5(15), 7323 (2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society Publishing. The TEM-BF images of Janus mesoporous nanomotors, representing (D1) JMSNM (40 nm)-Pt (2 nm), (D2) JMSNM (65 nm)-Pt (2 nm), and (D3) JMSNM (90 nm)-Pt (2 nm), from left to right, respectively. Reproduced with permission from Ma et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(15), 4976 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society Publishing.

FIG. 4.

(A) Transmission electron micrographs of SiO2-GNRs synthesized using different TEOS concentrations prediluted in anhydrous MeOH.The scale bar in A (a) applies to all panels except the inset in A (f), which shows a zoomed-in image of a lobed SiO2-GNR. Reproduced with permission from Rowe et al., Chem. Mater. 30(18), 6249 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society Publishing. (B) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the multi-regional and patchy Janus particles through the self-assembly of silica particles (230 nm), which were covalently attached to the surface of P(S-r-AA) and subsequently sunk into the polymer film as a function of reaction time. Gold NPs (15 nm) were then electrostatically assembled onto the surface of amine-modified silica particles (230 nm). These hybrid particles were then annealed with and without compatibilizing agents to form the Janus particles. Reproduced with permission from McConnell et al., Nano Lett. 10(2), 603 (2010). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society Publishing. (C) Composition and dimensions of the Janus particles formed from SiO2, TiO2, Ni, and Au, where Ni is sandwiched between Au and SiO2/TiO2. Reproduced with permission from Y. L. Lyubarskaya and A. A. Shestopalov, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5(15), 7323 (2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society Publishing. The TEM-BF images of Janus mesoporous nanomotors, representing (D1) JMSNM (40 nm)-Pt (2 nm), (D2) JMSNM (65 nm)-Pt (2 nm), and (D3) JMSNM (90 nm)-Pt (2 nm), from left to right, respectively. Reproduced with permission from Ma et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(15), 4976 (2015). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society Publishing.

Close modal

B.3. Polymeric/inorganic hybrid Janus materials

Polymeric–inorganic hybrid Janus particles combine the properties of both polymers and inorganic constituents. These particles present numerous advantages compared to other types of Janus particles, mainly in photoelectric, responsive, and magnetic properties, along with flexibility and ease of processing.24 This type of Janus particle is generally fabricated by immobilization/masking,67 phase separation,51 emulsion polymerization,68 and seeded growth.69 The morphology of these particles is typically snowman, dumbbell, or eccentric core-shell structures. Faria et al.70 synthesized two types of Janus particles by anchoring Pd on the surface of nano-hybrids made up of silica oxide and carbon nanotubes. Pd was anchored throughout the surface on one surface, whereas on the hydrophobic side on the other, as depicted in Fig. 5(A). The particles thus obtained showed high phase selectivity and a remarkable ability to stabilize oil in water emulsions. Chen et al.71 synthesized PS-Fe3O4@SiO2-polyethylene oxide (PEO) Janus particles by transferring self-assembled PS-b-PAA copolymer membranes at an emulsion interface, where preferential adsorption of magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 core shells got amine capped by specific molecular interactions, as shown in Fig. 5(B). The exposed side of the core-shell particles was modified to conjugate aldehyde-capped polyethylene oxide (PEO). Covalent bonding made the connections robust, and the hydrophobic and hydrophilic chains were distinctly compartmentalized on either side of the particle. Liu et al.72 demonstrated dual functionalized, anisotropic Janus particles’ hyaluronic acid (HA)-JMSN/DOX-2, 3-dimethylmaleic anhydride (DMMA) by modifying one side of MSN (mesoporous silica nanoparticle)-NH2 with hyaluronic acid (HA) and the other side with charge reversal group 2, 3-dimethylmaleic anhydride (DMMA), as illustrated in Figs. 5(C) and 5(D). The as-prepared JPs were superior to isotropous nanoparticles. When intravenously injected in mice, the particle inhibited tumor growth and improved the survival rate of tumor-infected rats. As a mechanism, they explained that the negatively charged ligand of this particle detaches on entering the weakly acidic microenvironment of a tumor cell. The particle thus exhibits a strong positive charge with HA on the surface that binds to CD44 receptors on the tumor cells, thereby inhibiting tumor growth. Chen et al.73 synthesized Janus cages with bilayer inorganic–polymeric composite shells by synthesizing silicon precursors through a sol-gel process followed by the grafting of polymers on the interior surface of the cage, Fig. 5(E). It was reported that the internal hydrophobic layer was tuneable for oil collection, whereas the exterior hydrophilic layer ensured good dispersibility of the microspheres in water. Liu et al.74 modified mono-dispersed colloids of silica with aminopropyl-trimethoxysilane (APTMS) that was allowed to cool to form wax/silica–NH2 composite spheres. These were then immersed in NH4F, and the exposed side is etched Fig. 5(F). The process yielded a Janus particle with a coarse and smooth side having clear circular etching groove separating them. A selective area energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) revealed that the smooth side had the presence of amino group, whereas no amino group was present on the coarser side. Moreover, both the sides of the JPs were connected by covalent bonds, which preserved the Janus characteristics of the particles.

FIG. 5.

(A) Synthesis of a Janus particle loaded with the Pd catalyst on both sides, along with the schematic representation of the hydrogenation reactions that are taking place in the oil and water phases. Reproduced with permission from Faria et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 352(14–15), 2359 (2010). Copyright 2010 John Wiley and Sons. (B) Amine group capped Fe3O4@SiO2 particles on the top left, PS-b-PAA stabilized and paraffin spheres on the top right, and the other two pics depict the adsorption of the amine capped particles onto the paraffin. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al., Langmuir 35(18), 6032 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C and D) Synthesis of the HA-JMSN/DOX-DMMA followed by the synergistic effect of pH-sensitive charge reversal and active targeting of HA-JMSN/DOX-DMMA for efficient tumor-targeting delivery. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(47), 44582 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (E) Synthesis of a Janus cage with bi-layered polymer–inorganic composites. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al., Macromolecules 46(10), 4126 (2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (F) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Janus non-spherical colloids by asymmetrically etching the exposed side of the silica colloids at a Pickering emulsion interface. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., Chem. Commun. 2009(26), 3871. Copyright 2009 Royal Society of Chemistry.

FIG. 5.

(A) Synthesis of a Janus particle loaded with the Pd catalyst on both sides, along with the schematic representation of the hydrogenation reactions that are taking place in the oil and water phases. Reproduced with permission from Faria et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 352(14–15), 2359 (2010). Copyright 2010 John Wiley and Sons. (B) Amine group capped Fe3O4@SiO2 particles on the top left, PS-b-PAA stabilized and paraffin spheres on the top right, and the other two pics depict the adsorption of the amine capped particles onto the paraffin. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al., Langmuir 35(18), 6032 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C and D) Synthesis of the HA-JMSN/DOX-DMMA followed by the synergistic effect of pH-sensitive charge reversal and active targeting of HA-JMSN/DOX-DMMA for efficient tumor-targeting delivery. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(47), 44582 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (E) Synthesis of a Janus cage with bi-layered polymer–inorganic composites. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al., Macromolecules 46(10), 4126 (2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (F) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Janus non-spherical colloids by asymmetrically etching the exposed side of the silica colloids at a Pickering emulsion interface. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., Chem. Commun. 2009(26), 3871. Copyright 2009 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Close modal

In the last few years, tremendous progress has been made in formulating various new strategies for synthesizing JPs.3,45 More specifically, wide ranges of JPs can be prepared by a plethora of robust methods, including techniques exploiting topo-selective surface modification (masking),75 phase separation,57,76 surface nucleation,77 modification at Pickering emulsions,28,78,79 self-assembly,80 sputtering,81 microfluidics,82 and seeded growth.83,84

“Immobilization/masking/selective modification at the interface” is one of the most popular techniques for JP synthesis. The technique employs a temporary immobilization template for breaking the symmetry of the particle by partial masking of one face.85 This concept has its roots in (i) 2D planar substrates for inducing asymmetry in the particles, (ii) immobilization of the protein capsids and the smallest NPS, and (iii) topo-selective modification of (sub)-micrometer particles at the Pickering emulsions.2 In this synthesis technique, homogeneous particles are kept fixed on an interface or substrate; subsequently, one or both surfaces of the particle are functionalized to fabricate the JPs by employing a template, mask, or the shadow of the adjacent particle, as shown in Fig. 6(A).86 After that, physical or chemical processes are employed to modify the unshielded side of the particles to form desired JPs.2 In due course, removing the coating yields an anisotropic Janus particle.87 A wide variety of JPs of different natures and sizes can be synthesized by using this method, such as metallic particles,88 silica particles,89 and polymeric beads.90 Although straightforward and simple, this technique gives us a lower yield in multifunctional compounds. A typical batch can sometimes generate only milligram quantities of Janus particles;91 the process is sometimes labor-intensive. Masking and desymmetrization can also be achieved by employing sequential deposition of materials within channels of two-dimensional arrays of cylindrical pores and by subsequently dissolving the templates to recover Janus materials.92 Several research groups have prepared hybrid organic/inorganic rods by sequential electrodeposition of materials inside the pores of nanoporous alumina templates, followed by their dissolution to generate Janus particles.93 Kloberg et al.94 demonstrated the use of a 2D nanomaterial, silicane, as a solid state masking substrate for the anisotropic modification of silicon quantum dots using trimethyl(vinyl)silane; the pictorial description of the process is depicted in Fig. 6(B). The resultant Janus particle did not render a clear dispersion like silicon quantum dots (QDs) and exhibited a very different PL characteristic from its constituent elements. Andala et al.95 used gold nanospheres stabilized with dodecyl amine (DDA) dispersed in a toluene–water mixture; the same amount of hydrophobic dodecanethiol (DDT) and hydrophilic, fully deprotonated mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) were simultaneously added to the mixture, which lead to the formation of JPs at the interface. The thermodynamic aspects of the process were studied by adding the ligands in different order; in both the cases, the same JP was obtained, Fig. 6(C).

FIG. 6.

(A) Schematic illustration for fabrication of JPs using the masking process. (B) General synthetic pathway to obtain bi-functional Janus SiQDs. Here, after deposition of SiQDs on SiNS and subsequent functionalization, the SiNS mask is removed through UV irradiation while simultaneously functionalizing SiQDs. Reproduced with permission from Kloberg et al., Adv. Mater. 33(38), 2100288 (2021). Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons. (C1)–(C4) The synthesis procedure of bi-functional metallic Janus particles by masking technique. Reproduced with permission from Andala et al., ACS Nano 6(2), 1044 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 6.

(A) Schematic illustration for fabrication of JPs using the masking process. (B) General synthetic pathway to obtain bi-functional Janus SiQDs. Here, after deposition of SiQDs on SiNS and subsequent functionalization, the SiNS mask is removed through UV irradiation while simultaneously functionalizing SiQDs. Reproduced with permission from Kloberg et al., Adv. Mater. 33(38), 2100288 (2021). Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons. (C1)–(C4) The synthesis procedure of bi-functional metallic Janus particles by masking technique. Reproduced with permission from Andala et al., ACS Nano 6(2), 1044 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Microfluidic is a relatively new method developed recently to fabricate JPs.96 Microfluidic technique provides many vital characteristics unavailable in traditional batch processes, such as shorter mixing and residence time, high mass transfer and mixing rate, and clear-cut reaction temperatures owing to the eccentric behavior of fluids in a micrometer scale.82 The JPs synthesized via microfluidics are typically formed by solidifying Janus droplets using polymerization and separating the two phases inside the particles.82,97,98 For example, mono-dispersed JPs consisting of two immiscible organic phases are generated in a co-flowing aqueous phase. In particular, the mono-dispersed, anisotropic polymer particles are synthesized by subsequent off-chip polymerization, as reported elsewhere.99 Similarly, for synthesizing a JP in a sheath system, a “Y” shaped channel is employed to generate a two-phase organic stream, introduced in a co-flowing aqueous stream to produce a Janus droplet.99 Nisisako and Torii have demonstrated a unique setup by dispersing titanium oxide and pigments of carbon black dispersed in an acrylic monomer to prepare separate white and black monomers. After the formation of droplets and off-chip polymerization, a Janus particle is obtained with electrical and color anisotropies.6 A recent report demonstrated that this synthesis process could fabricate anisotropic magnetic JPs.100 Wang et al.101 adopted a microfluidic strategy to synthesize (Au nanorod@Ag)-polyaniline [(AuNR@Ag)-PANI] Janus nanoparticles, where a seed-mediated growth method was utilized to create the gold nanorod (Au NR) in an aqueous solution. Subsequently, the AuNR, polyaniline, and AgNO3 were injected into the microfluidic machine. Silver (Ag) growth was observed on one side of the nanorods and polyaniline on the other, generating a Janus nanoparticle. On another note, JPs with a sharp interface between the constituting phases can be synthesized using a continuous microfluidic synthesis technique. Shah et al. demonstrated a synthesized process to develop a new type of JPs with a PNIPAm poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) microgel-rich side and a PAAm-rich side (polyacrylamide) by injecting two immiscible monomers, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and NIPAm, through the main channel of the microfluidic machine with side channels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) aqueous solution acting as sheath flows. In this process, a sharp interface is developed within the JPs composed of the two constituent monomers. In contrast, the JP retains this sharp interface in the subsequent polymerization steps.102 

Furthermore, Yin et al.97 synthesized single-phase, mono-dispersed Janus superballs using microfluidic synthesis. Here, a microfluidic setup was built up with a single needle micro-channel and an internal microfluidic solution of a dichloromethane solution of poly(methyl methacrylate-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/cadmium sulfide quantum dot, poly(MMA-co-HEMA)/CdS QD–polymer hybrid as the discontinuous phase (oil phase) and polyvinyl alcohol in the aqueous solution, as the continuous phase. The constant flow of the water phase cuts off the oil phase, and the surface tension between water and oil forms a perfectly spherical droplet. Seo et al.103 used one microfluidic step process to develop a novel Janus micro-hydrogel, as shown in Fig. 7(A). Based on N-isopropyl acrylamide (NIPAAm), N-rich and N-poor NIPAAm were pumped simultaneously using a two-channel microfluidic setup. In this approach, cross-linking of two separate streams was prevented by using liquid–liquid phase separation, which allowed for the fabrication of compartmentalized structure in a single step. This results in a JP consisting of N-rich and N-poor phases, which exhibited anisotropic thermos-responsive behavior. Khan et al.104 fabricated drug-loaded poly(methyl acrylate)/poly(acrylamide) Janus particles by employing a side-by-side capillary microfluidic setup. As depicted in Fig. 7(B), silicon oil 500 cSt was used as the continuous phase to generate biphasic Janus droplets, as shown in Figs. 7(C1) and 7(C2). Similarly, a two-channel microfluidic system was utilized for the fabrication of magnetic fluorescent bifunctional JPs, as demonstrated in Fig. 7(D). Similarly, this microfluidic synthesis process can also be adopted for synthesizing microhydrogels as reported in various recent reports.105,106 Nisisako and Torii99 showed that the volume ratio of two organic phases in the Janus droplets could be controlled by varying the flow rates of two organic phases via the microfluidic synthesis technique. They demonstrated a planar microfluidic system to generate biphasic Janus particles [Figs. 7(E1) and 7(E2)], employing polymerizable 1, 6-hexanediol diacrylate as a precursor.99 

FIG. 7.

(A) Janus monomer microdroplets containing hydrophilic (water-soluble dye) materials and organophilic (fat-soluble dye) materials. Reprinted with permission from Seo et al., Langmuir 29(49), 15137 (2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (B) Side-by-side capillary microfluidic setup for drug-loaded Janus particles. Each capillary has 100 µm internal diameter (ID), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). (C1) Optical and (C2) SEM images of the dumbbell-shaped JPs produced via microfluidics. Reprinted with permission from Khan et al., Int. J. Pharm. 473(1–2), 239 (2014). Copyright 2014 Elsevier. (D) Schematic illustration of the formation of aqueous droplets in a microfluidic device from three independent semidilute PNIPAAm solutions. It also demonstrates that after droplet breaks up, the center phase (colorless PNIPAAm) is assembled in the core of the droplets, whereas the left-flowing and right-flowing phases (green- and red-tagged PNIPAAm) form Janus-shaped shells. Reprinted with permission from Yin et al., Adv. Mater. 23(26), 2915 (2011). Copyright 2011 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA. (E1) and (E2) Morphology of biphasic Janus particles composed of equal amounts of two immiscible organic phases. Reprinted with permission from T. Nisisako and T. Torii, Adv. Mater. 19(11), 1489 (2007). Copyright 2007 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA.

FIG. 7.

(A) Janus monomer microdroplets containing hydrophilic (water-soluble dye) materials and organophilic (fat-soluble dye) materials. Reprinted with permission from Seo et al., Langmuir 29(49), 15137 (2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (B) Side-by-side capillary microfluidic setup for drug-loaded Janus particles. Each capillary has 100 µm internal diameter (ID), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). (C1) Optical and (C2) SEM images of the dumbbell-shaped JPs produced via microfluidics. Reprinted with permission from Khan et al., Int. J. Pharm. 473(1–2), 239 (2014). Copyright 2014 Elsevier. (D) Schematic illustration of the formation of aqueous droplets in a microfluidic device from three independent semidilute PNIPAAm solutions. It also demonstrates that after droplet breaks up, the center phase (colorless PNIPAAm) is assembled in the core of the droplets, whereas the left-flowing and right-flowing phases (green- and red-tagged PNIPAAm) form Janus-shaped shells. Reprinted with permission from Yin et al., Adv. Mater. 23(26), 2915 (2011). Copyright 2011 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA. (E1) and (E2) Morphology of biphasic Janus particles composed of equal amounts of two immiscible organic phases. Reprinted with permission from T. Nisisako and T. Torii, Adv. Mater. 19(11), 1489 (2007). Copyright 2007 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA.

Close modal

The microfluidic synthesis method has also been applied to synthesize bi-colored Janus particles with electrical anisotropy. Nisisako et al.6 also demonstrated bi-colored droplets with two hemispheres using isopropyl as the precursors. Two parallel streams of the microfluidic system were injected simultaneously: one doped with carbon (black colored) and the other with TiO2 (white colored). Finally, the resultant JPs obtained via this process exhibit exceptional features, while the JPs are made from two distinct sections. Such JPs showed superior weather-resistant properties compared to conventional organic dyes. In addition, carbon black and TiO2 exhibit opposite electrical charging capabilities, thereby providing the opposing surfaces of the JP with asymmetric charge distribution.

In the natural world, numerous molecular structures arise through a self-assembly process, viz, self-assembled monomer layers and protein folding. In colloidal chemistry, the patchy surfaces are made out of “molecular colloids,” which leads to their self-assembly in a complex structure.107 The self-assembly process of nanomaterials synthesis is an approach in which constituent elements form an ordered structure at the interface or in the solution.23,108 This simple method can fabricate particles with delicate structures in which JPs retain the original properties of the constituents.2 Chen et al.109 developed JPs with one negatively charged hemisphere and another hydrophobic as a prototypical system to study the kinetics of self-assembly at a single particle level based on theory and molecular dynamics coupled with experimental visualization. It was demonstrated that the kinetic data obtained were consistent with a reversible first-order reaction. Moreover, they observed that in their system, the octahedral shape was stable, but growth proceeded by the rotation of particles in the feeder clusters as the particles in the end had the largest rotational freedom, which led to the formation of elongated structures. In self-assembly, the small nanoparticle core is typically the first to be fabricated, followed by the deposition of the second material via the polymerization process.110 The morphology and nano-structures of the assembled JPs depend on the varied solubility of the polymers in the solvent and their intrinsic physical properties.111 Investigations on self-assembled block copolymers have garnered interest in recent times.112 Self-assembly of block copolymers is a very agile process to fabricate a nanoscale supramolecule in bulk or solution. Depending on the interaction strength, the obtained microstructure is tunable, where one can synthesize various shapes, such as spheres to lamellar and cylinders.113 The self-assembly process could yield JPs from block polymers containing two or more mutually incompatible segments with a high molecular weight. This copolymer can be pre-dissolved in a co-solvent of all the segments, while an unfavorable solvent (e.g., water) is added in the mixture. After that, the solution mixture became non-conducive to the dissolution of hydrophobic segments, which leads to the aggregation and formation of micelles. With the reduction in interfacial energy between the solvent and the micelles, the hydrophilic segments become fixed with multiple morphologies and a solution of self-assembly particles is formed.111 The state of aggregation formed during this approach is dependent on three primary parameters: (i) the volume fraction of various segments, (ii) Flory–Huggins interaction parameter, and (iii) the degree of polymerization of the copolymer. Song et al.114 developed bifunctional JPs containing Au–Fe3O4 NP grafted with hydrophobic polystyrene on Fe3O4 and hydrophilic polyethylene glycol on Au. This self-assembly approach resulted in the formation of doubled layer plasmonic magnetic vesicles.

Self-assembly makes monitoring the morphology, pore properties, and composition of Janus Particles relatively easy.115 Nie et al.116 synthesized amphiphilic polymeric JPs by a single-pot synthesis method. The prepared nanoparticles were found to be self-assembled into large micelles. A hydrophobic divinyl cross-linker, a hydrophobic free-radical initiator, and a hydrophobic divinyl cross-linker were solubilized in the hydrophobic polymer layer (HPL), and a hydrophilic monomer remained in the aqueous phase. Hydrophobic spheres are composed of the resulting polymer grown in HPL during polymerization of the hydrophobic cross-linker. Polymerization of a water-soluble monomer was initiated by exposing one side of the sphere to water. In contrast, the other side of the hydrophobic sphere was embedded in and protected by HPL. Thus, they successfully fabricated an amphiphilic Janus particle with one side embedded with polymeric chains on a hydrophobic sphere. Moreover, this process is easily scalable, and JPs can be prepared in large quantities owing to the large interfacial area of the water/HPL interface, Fig. 8(A). Liang et al.117 synthesized Janus camptothecin–floxuridine conjugate (JCFC) NCs by the self-assembly in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Pentaerythritol linked to two hydrophilic floxuridine molecules and two hydrophobic camptothecin molecules by hydrolyzable ester linkage was used to fabricate bi-layered JCFC, Fig. 8(B). This Janus particle represents a strategy to preserve and deliver a 1:1M ratio of two drugs in a liposomal manner. Gröschel et al.118 developed a solution-based method for fabricating Janus particles via the self-assembly of ABC triblock tetra-polymers into multi-compartmental micelles, Fig. 8(C). First, a cross-linkage is formed between these compartments, which then gets disassembled to form Janus Particles. It was also demonstrated that JPs produced by this method exhibit tunable physical properties owing to their varying structures. Song et al.114 synthesized Janus Au–Fe3O4 NPs by self-assembly technique. Herein, the hydrophobic polystyrene (PS) was grafted on Fe3O4, and hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG) was grafted on Au by self-assembling. The amphiphilic graft distribution of polymeric grafts led to the formation of double-layered plasmonic magnetic vesicles. These vesicles demonstrated enhanced magnetic and optical properties, which were attributed to the coupling and interactions of the JPs. Moreover, these served as dual functional probes for in vivo dual magnetic resonance (MR) and photoacoustic imaging with high accuracy and resolution. Cheng et al.119 fabricated polymeric JPs by utilizing efficient intramolecular cross-linking of the middle P2VP block using 1, 4-dibromobutane in N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent from a polystyrene-b-poly(2-vinylpyridine)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer [Fig. 8(D)].

FIG. 8.

(A) Schematic illustration of the formation of a water-dispersible hybrid nanotube (HN, lower left-hand diagram); the Janus particle is synthesized (shown top right still associated with the HN) by employing the HN as a desymmetrization tool followed by the formation of a super-micelle due to the self-assembly of Janus particles (flowerlike structure shown at the bottom right) and the dissociation of a super-micelle. Reprinted with permission from Nie et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 46(33), 6321 (2007). Copyright 2007 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (B)  Schematic illustration of the self-assembly of ABC triblock terpolymers into multi-compartment micelles and the subsequent disassembly into Janus particles. Reprinted with permission from Gröschel et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(33), 13850 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of the chemical structure of a Janus camptothecin–floxuridine conjugate (JCFC) and its self-assembly into the liposome-like nanocapsule for cancer combination therapy. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al., Adv. Mater. 29(40), 1703135 (2017). Copyright 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (D) Synthesis of unimolecular polymeric Janus nanoparticles and their self-assembly in a common solvent, DMF. Reprinted with permission from Cheng et al., Macromolecules 41(21), 8159 (2008). Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 8.

(A) Schematic illustration of the formation of a water-dispersible hybrid nanotube (HN, lower left-hand diagram); the Janus particle is synthesized (shown top right still associated with the HN) by employing the HN as a desymmetrization tool followed by the formation of a super-micelle due to the self-assembly of Janus particles (flowerlike structure shown at the bottom right) and the dissociation of a super-micelle. Reprinted with permission from Nie et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 46(33), 6321 (2007). Copyright 2007 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (B)  Schematic illustration of the self-assembly of ABC triblock terpolymers into multi-compartment micelles and the subsequent disassembly into Janus particles. Reprinted with permission from Gröschel et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(33), 13850 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of the chemical structure of a Janus camptothecin–floxuridine conjugate (JCFC) and its self-assembly into the liposome-like nanocapsule for cancer combination therapy. Reprinted with permission from Liang et al., Adv. Mater. 29(40), 1703135 (2017). Copyright 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (D) Synthesis of unimolecular polymeric Janus nanoparticles and their self-assembly in a common solvent, DMF. Reprinted with permission from Cheng et al., Macromolecules 41(21), 8159 (2008). Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Ramsden and Gotch120 and Pickering121 discovered that particles with correct hydrophobicity could be used to stabilize the interface of two immiscible liquids and form a Pickering emulsion (PE). The particles at the interface are divided into two parts by this interface,122 which presents an opportunity to modify the parts to achieve the desired properties selectively.91,123 Hong et al.124 introduced the PE-interface method for the synthesis of asymmetric Janus materials. This method is used to fabricate asymmetric Janus particles of varied sizes and shapes, such as polymer-based micro-gel,125 molecularly imprinted polymer,126 polymersomes,127 graphene nanosheets,128 and metallic nanoparticles.129 

Templating with emulsions has several advantages for the synthesis of Janus particles; this method is easily scalable, and there is no requirement for expensive instruments or complex synthesis procedures. However, nano-sized particles with sizes less than 100 nm are hard to fabricate through this method as it is difficult to form a Pickering emulsion with nano-sized particles.92 To date, PE has been utilized to synthesize Janus particles at the interfaces by many research groups. For example, Hong et al.124 fabricated a bipolar Janus particle by dispersing fused silica in oil (wax)–water emulsion, as illustrated in Fig. 9(A). The silica particles aggregate to form clusters due to capillary forces as depicted in Fig. 9(B) whose external surface was then modified to functionalized one hemisphere with (aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane (APS) and the other hemisphere with n-octadecanetrichlorosilane (OTS). The as-produced particles were hydrophobic on the OTS side and cationic on the APS side. Saad et al.130 synthesized a Janus calcium carbonate nano-particle with the ability to self-propel themselves in a Newtonian fluid by the Pickering emulsion approach, which was utilized to impart anisotropy to the particle (introduce silica on calcium carbonate using sodium silicate solution), as depicted in Fig. 9(C). Chen et al. employed the Pickering emulsion approach to fabricate Janus PS-Fe3O4@SiO2-PEO, where a PS-b-PAA copolymer was used to emulsify the paraffin(oil)–water mixture. On cooling, the amine capped Fe3O4@SiO2 particles were preferentially absorbed on the copolymer due to electrostatic attraction. The exposed side was selectively chemically modified with hydrophilic polymers (PEO-CHO). The as-prepared Janus particles were magnetically responsive and amphiphilic in nature, as shown in Fig. 9(D).

FIG. 9.

(A) Schematic procedure to create Janus particles by functionalizing particles adsorbed onto an emulsion of water and oil, followed by subsequent cooling of the sample so that the oil crystallizes to form a wax. Reprinted with permission from Hong et al., Langmuir 22(23), 9495 (2006). Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society. (B) SEM image of silica particle monolayers on the surface of solid wax. Reprinted with permission from Perro et al., Colloids Surf., A 332(1), 57 (2009). Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.131 (C) Schematic diagram of the process involved in the chemical synthesis of silica-modified vaterite CaCO3 Janus particles. Reprinted with permission from Saad et al., Langmuir 36(42), 12590 (2020). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic diagram of synthesis of the Janus PS-Fe3O4@SiO2-PEO particle. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al., Langmuir 35(18), 6032 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 9.

(A) Schematic procedure to create Janus particles by functionalizing particles adsorbed onto an emulsion of water and oil, followed by subsequent cooling of the sample so that the oil crystallizes to form a wax. Reprinted with permission from Hong et al., Langmuir 22(23), 9495 (2006). Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society. (B) SEM image of silica particle monolayers on the surface of solid wax. Reprinted with permission from Perro et al., Colloids Surf., A 332(1), 57 (2009). Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.131 (C) Schematic diagram of the process involved in the chemical synthesis of silica-modified vaterite CaCO3 Janus particles. Reprinted with permission from Saad et al., Langmuir 36(42), 12590 (2020). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic diagram of synthesis of the Janus PS-Fe3O4@SiO2-PEO particle. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al., Langmuir 35(18), 6032 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Phase separation is considered one of the most efficient techniques for the fabrication of Janus particles.132 Preparation of Janus particles via this process is more straightforward than the masking or immobilization strategy.133 In this process, two or more immiscible polymers are dissolved in a solvent, employing this organic solution as the disperse phase of a Mini emulsion, later forming Janus particles with different segments having different functionalities. This is made possible due to the controlled phase separation of the polymer blend on the length scales of tens of nanometers.134 Steinhaus et al.135 employed ABC tri-block-tetra polymers to fabricate Janus nanorings. The step-by-step formations of such unique nanostructures are schematically illustrated in Fig. 10(A). Triblock tetra polymers were used with equal size A and C end blocks and a varying B fraction to form a lamella-like structure. PS-b-PB-b-PMMA (SBM) was self-assembled (evaporation induced) into a lamella ring morphology, which underwent cross-linkages to create Janus ring-like structures, Figs. 10(B)10(D).

FIG. 10.

(A) Fabrication of multi-compartment Janus microparticles and Janus nanorings. (B) TEM micrograph of SBM microparticles after self-assembly. (C) and (D) The multi-compartment macro-particle, as seen in a close-up TEM image of FIG. 10. (B). Reprinted with permission from Steinhaus et al., ACS Nano 13(6), 6269 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (E) Schematic for the fabrication of PEG/DEX using an emulsion–fabrication process. Reprinted with permission from Yuan et al., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 218(2), 1600422 (2017). Copyright 2016 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

FIG. 10.

(A) Fabrication of multi-compartment Janus microparticles and Janus nanorings. (B) TEM micrograph of SBM microparticles after self-assembly. (C) and (D) The multi-compartment macro-particle, as seen in a close-up TEM image of FIG. 10. (B). Reprinted with permission from Steinhaus et al., ACS Nano 13(6), 6269 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (E) Schematic for the fabrication of PEG/DEX using an emulsion–fabrication process. Reprinted with permission from Yuan et al., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 218(2), 1600422 (2017). Copyright 2016 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Close modal

Liquid–liquid phase separation has also been utilized for the fabrication of Janus materials. Zhang et al.136 synthesized Janus droplets by employing an evaporation-driven liquid–liquid phase separation approach. They used two immiscible liquids (octanol and water), which formed a homogeneous mixture, but with the addition of co-solvent (ethanol), liquid–liquid phase separation takes place; subsequently, the volatile ethanol evaporates, and the droplet slowly changes from homogeneous composition to a heterogeneous one. Water nucleation occurs along with the evaporation of ethanol and spontaneous de-wetting transition. Such phenomena occurred at the outer layer interfaces, while these two processes simultaneously occur until no more ethanol remains and Janus half water, a half organic droplet is formed. Yuan et al.137 fabricated Janus droplets by promoting phase separation in single-phase droplets composed of a two-phase aqueous system, which took place at room temperature. Due to the evaporation of water [Fig. 10(E)], these Janus droplets exhibited clear interfaces between the constituent phases, and the bioactivity of the encapsulated bio ingredient is also preserved.

In this method, the synthesis of Janus particles relies on the seed-growth emulsion polymerization (SEP) with a semi-batch process. First, a seed (initial latex particle) is fabricated by conventional emulsion polymerization. The process is then continued by the addition of a second monomer. This then leads to the onset of phase separation under ambient conditions, hence facilitating the formation of a completely phase-separated latex particle.2 Pfau et al.138 were the first to apply this process for the fabrication of acrylic composite particles composed of a soft PnBuA side and a hard PMMA part. This method can also be utilized to fabricate anisotropic Janus colloids, as demonstrated by Tang et al., who showed the development of Janus PAN (polyacrylonitrile)/PS (polystyrene) colloids via seeded emulsion polymerization of styrene onto cross-linked PAN (polyacrylonitrile) hollow seed spheres.55 Li et al.139 synthesized dumbbell-shaped Janus nanoparticles by using seeded emulsion polymerization using polystyrene as the precursor in a methanol–water mixture, as shown in Fig. 11(A). They observed that by varying the methanol concentration, the morphology of the particles could be changed from spherical to dumbbell. In lower methanol concentrations, spherical seeds were obtained, whereas in higher methanol concentrations, spherical to dumbbell transformations are occurred. It was proposed that the final shape is determined by mobility of protrusions on the seed particle surface and the thermodynamic equilibrium.

FIG. 11.

(A) Schematic synthesis of the alkynyl-terminated PCL, azide-functionalized terpolymer, Janus, and the core-shell nanoparticles. Reprinted with permission from S. Khoee and M. Soleymani, Appl. Surf. Sci. 494, 805 (2019). Copyright 2019 Elsevier, Inc. (B) Schematic illustration of morphology evolution during the seeded emulsion polymerization. Reprinted with permission from Li et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 543, 34 (2019). Copyright 2019 Elsevier, Inc. (C) Illustrative synthesis of the triblock Janus particle by seeded emulsion polymerization. (D) TEM images of PS/PDVB (polystyrene/polymeric divinylbenzene hollow particles). (E) SEM image depicting snowman-like diblock Janus particle against the PS hollow particle. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Macromolecules 52(1), 96 (2019). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 11.

(A) Schematic synthesis of the alkynyl-terminated PCL, azide-functionalized terpolymer, Janus, and the core-shell nanoparticles. Reprinted with permission from S. Khoee and M. Soleymani, Appl. Surf. Sci. 494, 805 (2019). Copyright 2019 Elsevier, Inc. (B) Schematic illustration of morphology evolution during the seeded emulsion polymerization. Reprinted with permission from Li et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 543, 34 (2019). Copyright 2019 Elsevier, Inc. (C) Illustrative synthesis of the triblock Janus particle by seeded emulsion polymerization. (D) TEM images of PS/PDVB (polystyrene/polymeric divinylbenzene hollow particles). (E) SEM image depicting snowman-like diblock Janus particle against the PS hollow particle. Reprinted with permission from Yu et al., Macromolecules 52(1), 96 (2019). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

The SEP has also been utilized to fabricate Janus magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) with high magnetic properties. Besides the advantages of being controlled by a magnetic field, this particle can be used to encapsulate drugs in the polymeric matrix without any outer magnetic interference. Moreover, the morphologies of Janus MNPs provide advanced multi-functionalities in composition, hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity, and other modular functionalities, enabling them to be used in multiple applications, a feature absent in their symmetrical counterparts.140 Janus MNPs were also developed using the same SEP technique.141 First, solvent evaporation was used to synthesize Janus nano-gels, followed by the modification/functionalization of one face of this gel using a thermos-response polymer. Such functionalization resulted in the formation of nano-gels with two different sides, as shown in Fig. 11(B).

Similarly, a tri-block JP has been synthesized with SEP technique and customized SEM methods, as reported several times recently.106 Yu et al.142 employed two-step SEP to synthesize a tri-block JP [as schematically depicted in Fig. 11(C)] using polystyrene (PS) and PS/PDVB (polystyrene/polymeric divinylbenzene) hollow particle as the precursor [Fig. 11(D)]. The as-synthesized snowman-like diblock Janus particle using this method [Fig. 11(C)] is depicted in Fig. 11(E).

Sputtering is a process in which a solid surface is bombarded with high-energy ions, leading to the dislodgment of atoms from the host surface of the solid (known as sputtering target) and deposited toward the desired substrates/surfaces.143 In this process, a Janus particle can be synthesized by modifying the surface properties of the exposed surface of a uniform nanomaterial, whereas the other surface is left unaltered.144 This approach can be used to control the morphology of the metal film by controlling its deposition time. Although the process yields a low quantity of JPs.145 however, the speed of the movement of Janus particle-based micro-motors can be varied by tuning the thickness of the sputtered layer and the rectifying voltage, as reported by Meng et al.146 A monolayer of JPs was synthesized by sputtering gold onto a thin polystyrene substrate, and the as-prepared particles were then re-dispersed in an aqueous medium.147 As depicted in Fig. 12(A), it was observed that by changing the sputtering condition, red, purple, black, and gold colored dispersions of JPs were obtained. The difference in color was attributed to the surface plasmon resonance absorption of gold nanoparticles. With the change in sputtering conditions, the morphology was altered, which resulted in the above changes. Maric et al.148 obtained various Janus particles by sputtering novel metals, such as Pt, Au, Ag, and Cu on TiO2, and obtained UV-activated micro-motors; they displayed this UV induced motion by a self-electrophoresis process, as depicted in Fig. 12(B). It was observed that the velocity of these particles strongly depended on the metal that was sputtered on TiO2, with Pt/TiO2 displaying the highest speed. Liu et al.149 fabricated an alkaline-driven GaInSn liquid metal Janus micro-motor by sputtering both metallic and non-metallic materials on the liquid metal (LM), as demonstrated in Fig. 12(C). The metal-coated JPs moved quicker than their non-metallic counterparts, which was due to the change in driving mechanism when sputtering materials are metallic or non-metallic. For example, the particle is self-electrophoresis when sputtering materials are metallic (here galvanic corrosion reaction takes place), and the other one is self-diffusiophoresis (here chemical corrosion reaction takes place) when sputtering materials are non-metallic. The liquid metal Janus micro-motor developed by them can flip between these two modes by varying the sputtered material. This switching of driving mechanism finds application in various biochemical scenarios.

FIG. 12.

(A) Schematic representation of the preparation of Janus particles by gold sputtering. The colors are controllable by changing the gold nanostructures localized on the hemispheres. Reprinted with permission from D. Suzuki and H. Kawaguchi, Colloid Polym. Sci. 284(12), 1471 (2006). Copyright 2006 Springer-Verlag. (B) Schematic illustration of the different reactions on the opposite sides of fabricated metal/TiO2 micromotors under UV light irradiation. The propulsion of the fabricated micromotor is shown in the scheme. Reprinted with permission from Maric et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(9), 1908614 (2020). Copyright 2020 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (C) Schematic diagram of GaInSn LMJM (liquid metal Janus materials) fabrication by sputtering technique. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(30), 35897 (2021). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 12.

(A) Schematic representation of the preparation of Janus particles by gold sputtering. The colors are controllable by changing the gold nanostructures localized on the hemispheres. Reprinted with permission from D. Suzuki and H. Kawaguchi, Colloid Polym. Sci. 284(12), 1471 (2006). Copyright 2006 Springer-Verlag. (B) Schematic illustration of the different reactions on the opposite sides of fabricated metal/TiO2 micromotors under UV light irradiation. The propulsion of the fabricated micromotor is shown in the scheme. Reprinted with permission from Maric et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(9), 1908614 (2020). Copyright 2020 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (C) Schematic diagram of GaInSn LMJM (liquid metal Janus materials) fabrication by sputtering technique. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(30), 35897 (2021). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Overall, we can see that Janus particles can be synthesized with many synthesis and processing techniques, which are unique and versatile for fabricating such multifunctional particles with different sizes, shapes, architectures, morphologies, and so on. All these synthesis and processing techniques have their own merits and demerits based on the type of particle produced with sets of functionalities. Table I summarizes all these synthesis and processing techniques for developing several Janus particles with different compositions, sizes, and morphologies, while Table II lists the various synthesis techniques and different precursors for developing morphology-controlled Janus particles.

TABLE I.

Morphologies and composition of typical Janus materials or particles.

Fabrication processCompositionsMorphologyType of ParticlesReferences
Phase separation PS/P2VP Sphere Nanoparticles 150  
Controlled vacuum-diffusion Co/CoP Irregular Nanoparticles 151  
Oleate-assisted micelle formation Ni–Fe  Spherical Nanoparticle 152  
Multi-step chemical process Au–SiO2 Sphere Microparticles 75  
Asymmetric modification of silica particles at Pickering emulsion interface SiO2-PS Snowman Nanoparticles 33  
Low-temperature-solution process CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti Honeycomb Nanoparticles 153  
Deposition and Selective Etching Pt1.4L/Ir3.1Cubic nanocages Nanoparticles 154  
Electrodeposition followed by annealing Ni0.1Co0.9Nanosheets Nanoparticles 155  
Chemical process Ni2Nanowires/cylindrical Nanoparticles 156  
Self-assembly DLD-FeCoP@CNT Irregular Nanoparticles 157  
Wax masking technique  Pd/SiO2 NPs Spherical Nanoparticles 79  
One-pot sol–gel process Silica@RF Bonsai-like Nanoparticles 50  
Sputtering method Au–WO3–C Sphere Macroparticles 158  
Chemical method Co/CoN Irregular Nanoparticles 81  
Chemical method followed by carbonizing treatment PtFe–Fe2Dumbbell Nanoparticles 159  
Seeded emulsion polymerization Spherical LPS/P(S-co-tBA) Nanoparticles 84  
Chemical method followed by evaporation PS/PMMA Spherical, snowman-like Nanoparticles 160  
Emulsion interfacial polymerization  PSDVB ⊃ PAA Crescent moon Nanoparticles 161  
Microfluidic PNIPAAm-SPO-fluorophore-PMBA Snowman Microparticles 162  
Microfluidic TiO2–ZnO Capsule Microparticles 163  
Seeded emulsion polymerization LPS/P(S-co-tBA) Snowman Nanoparticle 84  
Seeded emulsion polymerization PHEMA@PMAA Dumbbell, cauliflower Nanoparticles 164  
Ligand exchange AuFeOx Star-sphere Nanoparticle 165  
Ligand transfer Au NPs coated with compartmentalized. D-PA and PPh3 faces Vesicular Nanoparticles 166  
Plasma Polymerization Acrylonitrile, ferrocene and pyridine plasma polymerized coatings on titania/silica Spherical Microparticles 167  
Fabrication processCompositionsMorphologyType of ParticlesReferences
Phase separation PS/P2VP Sphere Nanoparticles 150  
Controlled vacuum-diffusion Co/CoP Irregular Nanoparticles 151  
Oleate-assisted micelle formation Ni–Fe  Spherical Nanoparticle 152  
Multi-step chemical process Au–SiO2 Sphere Microparticles 75  
Asymmetric modification of silica particles at Pickering emulsion interface SiO2-PS Snowman Nanoparticles 33  
Low-temperature-solution process CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti Honeycomb Nanoparticles 153  
Deposition and Selective Etching Pt1.4L/Ir3.1Cubic nanocages Nanoparticles 154  
Electrodeposition followed by annealing Ni0.1Co0.9Nanosheets Nanoparticles 155  
Chemical process Ni2Nanowires/cylindrical Nanoparticles 156  
Self-assembly DLD-FeCoP@CNT Irregular Nanoparticles 157  
Wax masking technique  Pd/SiO2 NPs Spherical Nanoparticles 79  
One-pot sol–gel process Silica@RF Bonsai-like Nanoparticles 50  
Sputtering method Au–WO3–C Sphere Macroparticles 158  
Chemical method Co/CoN Irregular Nanoparticles 81  
Chemical method followed by carbonizing treatment PtFe–Fe2Dumbbell Nanoparticles 159  
Seeded emulsion polymerization Spherical LPS/P(S-co-tBA) Nanoparticles 84  
Chemical method followed by evaporation PS/PMMA Spherical, snowman-like Nanoparticles 160  
Emulsion interfacial polymerization  PSDVB ⊃ PAA Crescent moon Nanoparticles 161  
Microfluidic PNIPAAm-SPO-fluorophore-PMBA Snowman Microparticles 162  
Microfluidic TiO2–ZnO Capsule Microparticles 163  
Seeded emulsion polymerization LPS/P(S-co-tBA) Snowman Nanoparticle 84  
Seeded emulsion polymerization PHEMA@PMAA Dumbbell, cauliflower Nanoparticles 164  
Ligand exchange AuFeOx Star-sphere Nanoparticle 165  
Ligand transfer Au NPs coated with compartmentalized. D-PA and PPh3 faces Vesicular Nanoparticles 166  
Plasma Polymerization Acrylonitrile, ferrocene and pyridine plasma polymerized coatings on titania/silica Spherical Microparticles 167  
TABLE II.

Synthesis techniques and various precursors for developing morphology-controlled Janus particles.

MaterialTechnique for fabricationPrecursorReferences
CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti Chemical deposition followed by phosphatization Co(OH)x(NO3)2−x·mH2153  
NiS2/MoS2 Hydrolysis followed by calcination NiMoO4 168  
Iron phosphide nanotubes A wet chemical process, followed by annealing Iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate [Fe(NO3)3·9H2O], sodium hypophosphite (NaH2PO2169  
MoReS3 nanosheets Hydrothermal process followed by anneling Sodium molybdate, sodium perrhenate, and thiourea 170  
Cu3P–Cu2A solid-state reaction followed by pyrolysis Copper chloride, phosphorus-containing resin 171  
RGO/1T-SeMoS Hydrothermal method RGO/1T-MoS2, selenium powder and potassium borohydride 172  
Cu3P@NF Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, nickel foam 173  
Ni3N/W5N4 Hydrothermal method followed by ion exchange and nitridation Ammonium tungsten, nickel nitrate hexahydrate, ferric nitrate nonahydrate, cobaltous nitrate hexahydrate 174  
CoMoP/CoP/NF Hydrothermal followed by phosphidation NaH2PO2·H2O, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2175  
Ni@Co–Ni–P Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Cobalt (II) nitrate hexa-hydrate, urea, ammonium fluoride and potassium hydroxide 176  
Co–Cu–P–NW Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Nickle foam, copper nitrate hemi(pentahydrate), sodium hypophosphite 177  
Mn–CoP3–5 1Ws/CFP Hydrothermal followed by vacuum phosphorization Co(NO3)2·6H2O, NH4 F, MnSO4·H2178  
FeNi–P/NF Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Red phosphorous (P), iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate, and urea 179  
CoS NF/CC Air annealing followed a hydrothermal process followed by sulfidation Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, sodium sulfide 180  
Co/CoN–NC Polymerization followed by calcination Cobaltous nitrate hexahydrate, ethylenediamine 81  
Pd13Cu3S7 NPs/C Cation exchange CuSCN, Pd(acac)2 181  
Ni(OH)2@Ni/CC Electrodeposition NiSO4·6H2O, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, and KOH 182  
Co/Mo2C@NC Hydrothermal followed by pyrolysis Dicyanoimidazole (DCI) with cobalt acetate (DCI-co) 183  
Ni–Mo–S Electroplating followed by hydrothermal reaction Nickel foam, Na2MoO4·2H2O, NiSO4·6H2184  
Ni2P/Ni5P4 Solvothermal followed by phosphorization Ni(NO3)2, NaH2PO2 185  
Co–Cu3P/CF Calcination followed by solvothermal method followed by phosphorization Cu(OH)2/CF, (NH4)2S2O8, NaOH 186  
Co/CoP-5 Colloidal emulsion followed by phosphorization Co(NO3)2.6H2O, NaH2PO2, triethylene diamine 151  
Ni2W4C–W3C/CNFs Chemical vapor deposition followed by calcination Nickel nitrate hexahydrate, ammonium meta tungstate 187  
H2–NiCat Electrodeposition Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, H3BO3 188  
Ni0.1Co0.9Electrodeposition followed by phosphorization Ni0.1Co0.9(OH)2, CFP, NaH2PO2·H2155  
Ni-P/CF Electrodeposition NiSO4·6H2O, copper foam, NaH2PO2 and RuCl3·3H2189  
H2–CoCat Reductive electrodeposition Co(NO3)2.6H2190  
CoNiP@NiFe LDH Electro-deposition followed by oxidation Nickel foam NiSO4, CoSO4NaH2PO2, NaCl, H3BO3 191  
DLD-FeCoP@CNT Coprecipitation followed by phosphorization Co–Fe-PBA/CNT, NaH2PO2 157  
PtFe–Fe3O4 One-pot synthesis followed by carbonizing Platinum (II) acetylacetonate, Fe(CO)5 159  
Fe2P@Fe3C/CNTs “Inside-out” gas-solid phase sintering NaH2PO2, FeCl3·6H2O, DCD 192  
MaterialTechnique for fabricationPrecursorReferences
CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti Chemical deposition followed by phosphatization Co(OH)x(NO3)2−x·mH2153  
NiS2/MoS2 Hydrolysis followed by calcination NiMoO4 168  
Iron phosphide nanotubes A wet chemical process, followed by annealing Iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate [Fe(NO3)3·9H2O], sodium hypophosphite (NaH2PO2169  
MoReS3 nanosheets Hydrothermal process followed by anneling Sodium molybdate, sodium perrhenate, and thiourea 170  
Cu3P–Cu2A solid-state reaction followed by pyrolysis Copper chloride, phosphorus-containing resin 171  
RGO/1T-SeMoS Hydrothermal method RGO/1T-MoS2, selenium powder and potassium borohydride 172  
Cu3P@NF Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, nickel foam 173  
Ni3N/W5N4 Hydrothermal method followed by ion exchange and nitridation Ammonium tungsten, nickel nitrate hexahydrate, ferric nitrate nonahydrate, cobaltous nitrate hexahydrate 174  
CoMoP/CoP/NF Hydrothermal followed by phosphidation NaH2PO2·H2O, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2175  
Ni@Co–Ni–P Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Cobalt (II) nitrate hexa-hydrate, urea, ammonium fluoride and potassium hydroxide 176  
Co–Cu–P–NW Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Nickle foam, copper nitrate hemi(pentahydrate), sodium hypophosphite 177  
Mn–CoP3–5 1Ws/CFP Hydrothermal followed by vacuum phosphorization Co(NO3)2·6H2O, NH4 F, MnSO4·H2178  
FeNi–P/NF Hydrothermal followed by phosphorization Red phosphorous (P), iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate, and urea 179  
CoS NF/CC Air annealing followed a hydrothermal process followed by sulfidation Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, sodium sulfide 180  
Co/CoN–NC Polymerization followed by calcination Cobaltous nitrate hexahydrate, ethylenediamine 81  
Pd13Cu3S7 NPs/C Cation exchange CuSCN, Pd(acac)2 181  
Ni(OH)2@Ni/CC Electrodeposition NiSO4·6H2O, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, and KOH 182  
Co/Mo2C@NC Hydrothermal followed by pyrolysis Dicyanoimidazole (DCI) with cobalt acetate (DCI-co) 183  
Ni–Mo–S Electroplating followed by hydrothermal reaction Nickel foam, Na2MoO4·2H2O, NiSO4·6H2184  
Ni2P/Ni5P4 Solvothermal followed by phosphorization Ni(NO3)2, NaH2PO2 185  
Co–Cu3P/CF Calcination followed by solvothermal method followed by phosphorization Cu(OH)2/CF, (NH4)2S2O8, NaOH 186  
Co/CoP-5 Colloidal emulsion followed by phosphorization Co(NO3)2.6H2O, NaH2PO2, triethylene diamine 151  
Ni2W4C–W3C/CNFs Chemical vapor deposition followed by calcination Nickel nitrate hexahydrate, ammonium meta tungstate 187  
H2–NiCat Electrodeposition Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, H3BO3 188  
Ni0.1Co0.9Electrodeposition followed by phosphorization Ni0.1Co0.9(OH)2, CFP, NaH2PO2·H2155  
Ni-P/CF Electrodeposition NiSO4·6H2O, copper foam, NaH2PO2 and RuCl3·3H2189  
H2–CoCat Reductive electrodeposition Co(NO3)2.6H2190  
CoNiP@NiFe LDH Electro-deposition followed by oxidation Nickel foam NiSO4, CoSO4NaH2PO2, NaCl, H3BO3 191  
DLD-FeCoP@CNT Coprecipitation followed by phosphorization Co–Fe-PBA/CNT, NaH2PO2 157  
PtFe–Fe3O4 One-pot synthesis followed by carbonizing Platinum (II) acetylacetonate, Fe(CO)5 159  
Fe2P@Fe3C/CNTs “Inside-out” gas-solid phase sintering NaH2PO2, FeCl3·6H2O, DCD 192  

The catalytic splitting of water to generate hydrogen and oxygen is one of the green energy sources that attracted more attention in very recent times. The key parameters are evaluated to determine the catalyst’s performance as follows:193 (i) over potential, (ii) Tafel slope, (iii) stability, (iv) Faradic efficiency, (v) turnover frequency, and (vi) mass and specific activities. A wide range of catalysts have been developed for the splitting of water over the past decade, including zero-, one-, two-, and three-dimensional materials (including metals, semiconductors, 2D transition metal di-chalcogenides, hybrid structures, and various heterostructure) and combinations of two or more of these nanoparticles.15,19–21 It is observed that some nanomaterials with an asymmetric heterostructured junction at the nanoscale can produce remarkable properties, which cannot be realized in homogeneous or symmetric nanomaterials.194 With their complex morphologies and ability to amalgamate the properties of various constituent components, Janus particles show promising results in the electrocatalysis of water for hydrogen and oxygen generation. Using the JPs, it is possible to have simultaneous HERs and OERs in a similar system with long-term stability. Specifically, overall efficient water splitting can be done employing bi-functional Janus catalysts that plays a pivotal role in enhancing water splitting efficiency by simultaneously proceeding with both hydrogen evolution reactions (HERs) and oxygen evolution reactions (OERs). In the upcoming sections i.e., in section A-C, there is a comprehensive summary of different applications of JP-based electrocatalysts and photocatalysts that have been fabricated to date.

The hydrogen evolution reaction is the dominant half-cell reaction in water electrolysis to produce hydrogen. The environmental condition of the reaction dictates the mechanism of HER.195 For HER in an acidic medium, the possible reaction steps are as follows:19,20,195
(1)
(2)
(3)
The reactions can proceed through Eq. (1), known as the Volmer step. However, the response may also proceed by the Heyrovsky or Tafel mechanisms, as given in Eq. (2) or Eq. (3).
On the other hand, in the alkaline medium, the reaction can proceed by only the Heyrovsky [Eq. (4)] or Volmer [Eq. (5)] step,18,19,21
(4)
(5)
Various materials have been devised over the past decade for HER, where it was observed that noble metals (Pt, Ru, and Ir) have the lowest overpotential for the generation of hydrogen during water splitting.196 However, these noble metals’ scarcity and costs make them economically unfeasible for large-scale/commercial adaptations.197 Many studies have thus focused on fabricating materials/multifunctional materials at par with noble metals and non-noble metals.17,18,21 More specifically, a vast range of literature studies have been available on the HER based on a wide range of materials, including noble metal alloys,196,198 noble metal–transition metal alloys,196 noble metal-based chalcogenides,199 noble metal-based phosphides,200 transition metals,201 transition metal alloys,193 and MOF.202 

Janus materials come up as suitable contenders of catalysts for the following reasons: (i) their Janus geometry increases the number of active sites, and so they are highly accessible to the reactant molecules;203 (ii) their high interfacial energy gives them a unique advantage while being used as an interfacial catalyst;204 (iii) their multi-functionality makes them suitable to be used as catalysts for the overall splitting of water;205 (iv) ease of separation of products; and (v) an enhanced rate of mass transfer between two phases, which accelerates the rate of reaction.70,206

Transition metal particles were generally used to fabricate Janus particles for hydrogen evolution. Zhang et al.168 synthesized Janus NiS2/MoS2, which showed an overpotential of 135 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2 in alkaline conditions. In contrast, precursors MoS2 nano-sheets and NiS2 nanoparticles have an overpotential of 434 and 315 mV, respectively, displaying a cooperative interaction between MoS2 and NiS2. To better understand this synergistic effect in hereto-interfaces of yolk-shell NSs and NiS2/MoS2, a linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curve of physically mixed MoS2 nanosheets and NiS2 nanoparticles was carried out. The Janus particle was observed to have better HER activity than the physically mixed sample. Thus, this validates that Janus materials act as better catalysts than their individual components owing to their multi-functionality. The schematic synthesis diagram and HER performance plots are depicted in Fig. 13.

FIG. 13.

(A) Schematic diagram of the strategy for the synthesis of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles. (B) XRD pattern of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NSs. (C) High-resolution XPS spectrum of S 2p of NiS2/MoS2 yolk shell NSs. (D) TEM images of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles. (E) HRTEM image of the circle seen in the TEM image of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles. (F) Polarization curve of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles in 1.0M KOH for HER. (G) Tafel slope of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles in 1.0M KOH for HER. (H) and (I) Polarization curve and Tafel slope of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles in 1.0M KOH for OER. Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al., Nanoscale 12(4), 2578 (2020). Copyright 2009 Royal Society of Chemistry.

FIG. 13.

(A) Schematic diagram of the strategy for the synthesis of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles. (B) XRD pattern of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NSs. (C) High-resolution XPS spectrum of S 2p of NiS2/MoS2 yolk shell NSs. (D) TEM images of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles. (E) HRTEM image of the circle seen in the TEM image of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles. (F) Polarization curve of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles in 1.0M KOH for HER. (G) Tafel slope of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles in 1.0M KOH for HER. (H) and (I) Polarization curve and Tafel slope of NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NS Janus particles in 1.0M KOH for OER. Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al., Nanoscale 12(4), 2578 (2020). Copyright 2009 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Close modal

Liu et al.153 synthesized unique JP having multifunctional compositions of CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti. They used a masking approach to grow lamellar cobalt nitrate hydroxide on Ti foil. One side of the foil saw microspheres having an average diameter of ∼2.7–6.3 µm. In contrast, perpendicular pores of the honeycomb structure were observed on the other side, as depicted in Fig. 14. The subsequent phosphidation of CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti was formed. High-angle annular dark field-scanning transmission electron microsopic (HAADF-STEM) image of the JPs showed numerous bright rods of Co2P and CoP, which confirmed the formation of Co2P and CoP nanocrystals in the porous honeycomb wall.

FIG. 14.

(A)–(F) SEM images of CoP/Co2P@NC of honeycomb structured microspheres and the corresponding particle size distribution (A-E). (G)–(L) CoP/Co2P@NC honeycomb microspheres with thick pore walls. (M) The EDX elemental mapping images of a CoP/Co2P@NC microsphere on Ti foil showing the distributions of elements Co, P, C, N, and O. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., iScience 23(7), 101264 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier, Inc.

FIG. 14.

(A)–(F) SEM images of CoP/Co2P@NC of honeycomb structured microspheres and the corresponding particle size distribution (A-E). (G)–(L) CoP/Co2P@NC honeycomb microspheres with thick pore walls. (M) The EDX elemental mapping images of a CoP/Co2P@NC microsphere on Ti foil showing the distributions of elements Co, P, C, N, and O. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., iScience 23(7), 101264 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier, Inc.

Close modal

The HER performance of the catalyst was evaluated in 0.5M H2SO4, and it showed an overpotential of 31 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2 and high stability (3000 cycles) under harsh acidic conditions. At the same time, the standard Pt/C electrode requires an overpotential of 26 mV. The HER characteristic plots and the SEM images are shown in Fig. 15.

FIG. 15.

(A) and (B) LSV and Tafel plot of CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti-10-350 in 0.5M H2SO4. (C) and (D) LSV curves of a CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti-10-350 electrode before and after 3000 CV cycles from +0.10 to −0.25 V vs RHE in 0.5M H2SO4 and Nyquist plot, respectively. (E) Cyclic voltammetry performed at various scan rates in the range 0.1–0.3 V vs RHE in 0.5M H2SO4. (F) The capacitive current densities at +0.20 V as a function of scan rate for different samples. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., iScience 23(7), 101264 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier, Inc.

FIG. 15.

(A) and (B) LSV and Tafel plot of CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti-10-350 in 0.5M H2SO4. (C) and (D) LSV curves of a CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti-10-350 electrode before and after 3000 CV cycles from +0.10 to −0.25 V vs RHE in 0.5M H2SO4 and Nyquist plot, respectively. (E) Cyclic voltammetry performed at various scan rates in the range 0.1–0.3 V vs RHE in 0.5M H2SO4. (F) The capacitive current densities at +0.20 V as a function of scan rate for different samples. Reprinted with permission from Liu et al., iScience 23(7), 101264 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier, Inc.

Close modal

Fu et al.170 fabricated Janus MoReS3 nanosheets using sodium molybdate, sodium perrhenate, and thiourea as precursors by employing a modified hydrothermal method followed by annealing of the product. Janus MoReS3 showed a highly enhanced HER activity compared to their components of ReS2 and MoS2. Specifically, the enhanced performance was because Janus MoReS3 provides a larger surface area and small interfacial electron transfer resistance than their individual counterparts. At higher current densities of 150 mA cm−2, it showed an overpotential of 189 mV, smaller than the commercial Pt/C electrode (∼261 mV at ∼150 mA cm−2).170 

Janus particles composed of noble metals and transition metals as constituents have also been reported. Lai et al. developed multifunctional JPs PtFe–Fe2C Janus particles using platinum (II) acetylacetonate and Fe (CO)5 as the substrate through a one-pot approach, followed by carbonizing the as-obtained PtFe–Fe3O4 particles (during one pot synthesis) in octadecyl amine under Ar atmosphere at 320 °C. They observed that the catalyst promotes a barrier-free interfacial electron transfer, boosting electrocatalysis. The catalyst displays an impressive overpotential of ∼4 mA/cm2 and a Tafel slope of only 23 mV dec−1 in 0.5M H2SO4.159 Several other Janus particle electrocatalysts have been reported to date for HER, and Table III summarizes the list of various other Janus particles used for HER (in different media) with their potential performances, such as over potential, Tafel slope, and stability (Fig. 16).

TABLE III.

List of the various Janus electrocatalysts used for the hydrogen evolution reaction.

Janus materialElectrolyteOver potential (mV)Tafel slope (mV/dec)Mass loading (mg cm−2)StabilityReferences
SeMoTe 0.5M H2SO4 76 (@10 mA/cm277 ⋯ ⋯ 207  
CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti 0.5M H2SO4 31 (@10 mA/cm2) 46 (@20 mA/cm244 20 h 153  
 1M KOH 49 (@10 mA/cm2) 68 (@20 mA/cm251 20 h  
 1.0M PBS 64 (@10 mA/cm2) 96 (@20 mA/cm298 20 h  
Cu3P–Cu21.0M KOH 138 (@10 mA/cm262.64 ⋯ 90 h 171  
NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NSs (hydrolysis) 1.0M KOH 135 (@10 mA/cm2107 10 h 168  
Iron phosphide nanotubes 0.5M H2SO4 88 (@10 mA/cm235.5 1.6 14 h 169  
 1M KOH 120 (@10 mA/cm259.5 ... ...  
RGO/1T-MoS2 0.5M H2SO4 172 (@10 mA/cm254 ⋯ ⋯ 172  
RGO/1T-SeMoS 0.5M H2SO4 49 (@10 mA/cm237 ⋯ ⋯  
Cu3P@NF 1.0M KOH 105 (@10 mA/cm242 1.2 24 h 173  
RGO/1T′-TeMoSe 0.5 M H2SO4 54 (@10 mA/cm237 ⋯ 4000 cycles 40 h 208  
Ni3N/W5N4 1.0M KOH 31 (@10 mA/cm234 ⋯ 300 h 174  
CoMoP/CoP/NF 1M KOH 54 (@10 mA/cm244.5 ⋯ 20 h 2000 cycles 175  
Ni@Co–Ni–P 1.0M KOH 52 (@10 mA/cm2) 79 (@20 mA/cm265.1 6.0 100 h 176  
Co–Cu–P-NS 1.0M KOH 99 (@10 mA/cm2) 121 (@20 mA/cm2) 153 (@50 mA/cm270.4 1.2 20 h 177  
Mn–CoP3-5 Ws/CFP 1.0M KOH 96 (@10 mA/cm254 ⋯ 24 h 178  
FeNi–P/NF 1.0M NaOH 102 (@10 mA/cm282 ⋯ 20 h 179  
Cobalt sulfide nanoflake array on carbon cloth (CoS NF/CC) 1.0M KOH 247 (@50 mA/cm273.4 ⋯ 20 h 180  
Janus CoN/Co cocatalyst in porous N-doped carbon 0.5M H2SO4 190 (@10 mA/cm265 0.21 100 h 81  
 1.0M KOH 150 (@10 mA/cm2110 0.21 100 h  
Pd13Cu3S7 NPs/C 0.5M H2SO4 64 (@10 mA/cm249.6 0.1 24 h 181  
Co–Cu3P/CF 1M NaOH 250 (@100 mA/cm275 0.84 40h 186  
Co/Mo2C@NC 1.0M KOH 121 (@10 mA/cm2) 267 (@50 mA/cm2166.85 ⋯ 30 h 183 and 209  
Ni–Mo–S 1.0M KOH 79 (@10 mA/cm2) 147 (@10 mA/cm2103 0.5 12 h 184  
Ni2P/Ni5P4 embedded in N-doped carbon 1.0M KOH 104 (@10 mA/cm289.5 ⋯ 20 h 185  
 0.5M H2SO4 113 (@10 mA/cm238.5 ⋯ 20 h  
Janus Co/CoP nanoparticles 1.0M KOH 193 (@10 mA/cm2) 225 (@20 mA/cm273.8 0.88 12 h 151  
 1.0M PBS 138 (@10 mA/cm2⋯ ⋯ ⋯  
 0.5M H2SO4 178 (@10 mA/cm2⋯ ⋯ ⋯  
Ni2W4C–W3C/CNFs 1.0M KOH 63 (@10 mA/cm2) 350 (@50 mA/cm2112 ⋯ 12 h 187  
Ni21M KOH 250 (@20 mA/cm2100 0.38 48 h 156 and 210  
Ni0.1Co0.91M PBS 125 (@10 mA/cm2103 0.58 20 h 155  
Ni-P/CF 1.0M KOH 98 (@10 mA/cm255 15 h 189  
Ni(OH)2@Ni/CC 1.0M KOH 68 (@10 mA/cm2) 118 (@20 mA/cm297 2.8 20 h 182  
CoNiP@NiFe layered double hydroxides 1.0M KOH 68 (@10 mA/cm2) 255 (@50 mA/cm232 ⋯ 20 h 191  
NiSe/NF 1.0M KOH 136 (@100 mA/cm276.6 ⋯ 12 h 211  
Fe2P@Fe3C/CNT 1.0M KOH 83 (@10 mA/cm253 0.065 200 h 192  
DLD-FeCoP@CNT 1.0M KOH 166 (@10 mA/cm257.1 ⋯ 10 h 157  
PtFe–Fe2C NPs 0.5M H2SO4 4 (@10 mA/cm223 0.51 5000 cycles 159  
Ce-α-Bi2O3-rGO 1.0M KOH 245 (@10 mA/cm2162 ⋯ ⋯ 212  
Ni/W@NF 1.0M KOH ∼63 (@10 mA/cm266.09 ⋯ 60 h 213  
IrW nanobranches 0.1M HClO4 25 (@10 mA/cm251.2 0.06 ⋯ 214  
 0.1M KOH 29 (@10 mA/cm271.2 0.06 ⋯  
 1M PBS 35 (@10 mA/cm259.3 0.06 ⋯  
HNDCM-Co/CoP 0.5M H2SO4 135 (@10 mA/cm266 ⋯ 20 h 215  
 1M KOH 138 (@10 mA/cm264 ⋯ 20 h  
Janus materialElectrolyteOver potential (mV)Tafel slope (mV/dec)Mass loading (mg cm−2)StabilityReferences
SeMoTe 0.5M H2SO4 76 (@10 mA/cm277 ⋯ ⋯ 207  
CoP/Co2P@NC/Ti 0.5M H2SO4 31 (@10 mA/cm2) 46 (@20 mA/cm244 20 h 153  
 1M KOH 49 (@10 mA/cm2) 68 (@20 mA/cm251 20 h  
 1.0M PBS 64 (@10 mA/cm2) 96 (@20 mA/cm298 20 h  
Cu3P–Cu21.0M KOH 138 (@10 mA/cm262.64 ⋯ 90 h 171  
NiS2/MoS2 yolk-shell NSs (hydrolysis) 1.0M KOH 135 (@10 mA/cm2107 10 h 168  
Iron phosphide nanotubes 0.5M H2SO4 88 (@10 mA/cm235.5 1.6 14 h 169  
 1M KOH 120 (@10 mA/cm259.5 ... ...  
RGO/1T-MoS2 0.5M H2SO4 172 (@10 mA/cm254 ⋯ ⋯ 172  
RGO/1T-SeMoS 0.5M H2SO4 49 (@10 mA/cm237 ⋯ ⋯  
Cu3P@NF 1.0M KOH 105 (@10 mA/cm242 1.2 24 h 173  
RGO/1T′-TeMoSe 0.5 M H2SO4 54 (@10 mA/cm237 ⋯ 4000 cycles 40 h 208  
Ni3N/W5N4 1.0M KOH 31 (@10 mA/cm234 ⋯ 300 h 174  
CoMoP/CoP/NF 1M KOH 54 (@10 mA/cm244.5 ⋯ 20 h 2000 cycles 175  
Ni@Co–Ni–P 1.0M KOH 52 (@10 mA/cm2) 79 (@20 mA/cm265.1 6.0 100 h 176  
Co–Cu–P-NS 1.0M KOH 99 (@10 mA/cm2) 121 (@20 mA/cm2) 153 (@50 mA/cm270.4 1.2 20 h 177  
Mn–CoP3-5 Ws/CFP 1.0M KOH 96 (@10 mA/cm254 ⋯ 24 h 178  
FeNi–P/NF 1.0M NaOH 102 (@10 mA/cm282 ⋯ 20 h 179  
Cobalt sulfide nanoflake array on carbon cloth (CoS NF/CC) 1.0M KOH 247 (@50 mA/cm273.4 ⋯ 20 h 180  
Janus CoN/Co cocatalyst in porous N-doped carbon 0.5M H2SO4 190 (@10 mA/cm265 0.21 100 h 81  
 1.0M KOH 150 (@10 mA/cm2110 0.21 100 h  
Pd13Cu3S7 NPs/C 0.5M H2SO4 64 (@10 mA/cm249.6 0.1 24 h 181  
Co–Cu3P/CF 1M NaOH 250 (@100 mA/cm275 0.84 40h 186  
Co/Mo2C@NC 1.0M KOH 121 (@10 mA/cm2) 267 (@50 mA/cm2166.85 ⋯ 30 h 183 and 209  
Ni–Mo–S 1.0M KOH 79 (@10 mA/cm2) 147 (@10 mA/cm2103 0.5 12 h 184  
Ni2P/Ni5P4 embedded in N-doped carbon 1.0M KOH 104 (@10 mA/cm289.5 ⋯ 20 h 185  
 0.5M H2SO4 113 (@10 mA/cm238.5 ⋯ 20 h  
Janus Co/CoP nanoparticles 1.0M KOH 193 (@10 mA/cm2) 225 (@20 mA/cm273.8 0.88 12 h 151  
 1.0M PBS 138 (@10 mA/cm2⋯ ⋯ ⋯  
 0.5M H2SO4 178 (@10 mA/cm2⋯ ⋯ ⋯  
Ni2W4C–W3C/CNFs 1.0M KOH 63 (@10 mA/cm2) 350 (@50 mA/cm2112 ⋯ 12 h 187  
Ni21M KOH 250 (@20 mA/cm2100 0.38 48 h 156 and 210  
Ni0.1Co0.91M PBS 125 (@10 mA/cm2103 0.58 20 h 155  
Ni-P/CF 1.0M KOH 98 (@10 mA/cm255 15 h 189  
Ni(OH)2@Ni/CC 1.0M KOH 68 (@10 mA/cm2) 118 (@20 mA/cm297 2.8 20 h 182  
CoNiP@NiFe layered double hydroxides 1.0M KOH 68 (@10 mA/cm2) 255 (@50 mA/cm232 ⋯ 20 h 191  
NiSe/NF 1.0M KOH 136 (@100 mA/cm276.6 ⋯ 12 h 211  
Fe2P@Fe3C/CNT 1.0M KOH 83 (@10 mA/cm253 0.065 200 h 192  
DLD-FeCoP@CNT 1.0M KOH 166 (@10 mA/cm257.1 ⋯ 10 h 157  
PtFe–Fe2C NPs 0.5M H2SO4 4 (@10 mA/cm223 0.51 5000 cycles 159  
Ce-α-Bi2O3-rGO 1.0M KOH 245 (@10 mA/cm2162 ⋯ ⋯ 212  
Ni/W@NF 1.0M KOH ∼63 (@10 mA/cm266.09 ⋯ 60 h 213  
IrW nanobranches 0.1M HClO4 25 (@10 mA/cm251.2 0.06 ⋯ 214  
 0.1M KOH 29 (@10 mA/cm271.2 0.06 ⋯  
 1M PBS 35 (@10 mA/cm259.3 0.06 ⋯  
HNDCM-Co/CoP 0.5M H2SO4 135 (@10 mA/cm266 ⋯ 20 h 215  
 1M KOH 138 (@10 mA/cm264 ⋯ 20 h  
FIG. 16.

(A) Schematic illustration of the growth process of Co–Cu–P-NS and Co–Cu–P-NW. (B) and (C) SEM images of Co–Cu–P-NS with different magnification. (D) and (E) SEM and TEM image of Co–Cu–P-NW. (F) HER LSV curves and corresponding (G) Tafel plots of the different samples. (H) LSV curves of Co–Cu–P-NS initially and after 2000 CV cycles. (I) Time-dependent current density curve of Co–Cu–P-NS for 20 h. (J) OER LSV curves and corresponding (K) Tafel plots of different samples. (L) and (M) Side and top view of H* absorbed in a co-hybridized Cu3P surface, respectively. Reprinted with permission form Liu et al., Inorg. Chem. 60(23), 18325 (2021). Copyright 2021 American Society of Chemistry.

FIG. 16.

(A) Schematic illustration of the growth process of Co–Cu–P-NS and Co–Cu–P-NW. (B) and (C) SEM images of Co–Cu–P-NS with different magnification. (D) and (E) SEM and TEM image of Co–Cu–P-NW. (F) HER LSV curves and corresponding (G) Tafel plots of the different samples. (H) LSV curves of Co–Cu–P-NS initially and after 2000 CV cycles. (I) Time-dependent current density curve of Co–Cu–P-NS for 20 h. (J) OER LSV curves and corresponding (K) Tafel plots of different samples. (L) and (M) Side and top view of H* absorbed in a co-hybridized Cu3P surface, respectively. Reprinted with permission form Liu et al., Inorg. Chem. 60(23), 18325 (2021). Copyright 2021 American Society of Chemistry.

Close modal
Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) or water oxidation is a reaction in which molecular oxygen is generated through various electron/proton-coupled processes. In basic conditions, the hydroxyl group (OH) is oxidized and is transformed to H2O and O2, whereas in acidic conditions, two H2O molecules are oxidized to give four protons and one oxygen molecule, losing a total of four electrons in the process.216,217 The entire OER involves multiple steps, and the proposed mechanisms for acidic and alkaline conditions are given as
The proposed mechanisms under alkaline conditions are as follows:216,218
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
The proposed mechanisms under acidic conditions are as follows:218 
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
At the standard potential for OER at zero (0) pH, an external current source is required to generate a potential of 1.23 V vs the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) to carry out the reaction. As the reaction involves H+ and OHionic species, there is a shift of ∼59 mV for each unit of pH according to the Nernst equation. Thus, to remove the pH dependence , the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) is generally used so that the theoretical potential required for OER is always ~1.23 V.219 

A few metal oxides can withstand the oxidative potentials in acidic conditions; numerous research groups have been looking for non-noble metal oxides for OER electrocatalysts under alkaline conditions where metal hydroxide and oxides are chemically stable.220 Although many such non-noble metal oxides were synthesized, those materials could not be used for the overall splitting of water. In this regard, Janus particles, with their asymmetric multifunctional characteristics, proved to be a considerable impact as OER electrocatalysts. Xue et al.151 demonstrated a synthesis and applications of Janus Co/CoP nanoparticles [as depicted in Fig. 17(A-iv)], which exhibited an overpotential of 340 mV at 10 mA/cm2 and a Tafel slope of 79.5 mV per decade. The as-prepared Janus particle was active for both HER and OER, as designated in Fig. 17(B-iiv), where the Volmer–Heyrovsky process was found as the main reaction path for HER. It was observed that the synergistic effect between CoP and Co components leads to an enhancement of both OER and HER, while the as-fabricated electrodes were active at all the pH values, as shown in Fig. 17(C-ivi). Similarly, Liu et al. demonstrated Ni–P/CF-based JPs by electrodepositing a Ni–P nanoparticle film on copper foam (CF); the as-prepared JP-based electrode exhibited simultaneous catalytic activity of both HER and OER, showing an overpotential of 325 and 98 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA/cm2 for OER and HER, respectively. Moreover, when used as both cathode and anode, the electrode obtained a current density of ∼10 mA/cm2 at 1.68 V.189 

FIG. 17.

(A) (a) Schematic representation of the synthesis process of a Co/CoP-5 Janus nanoparticle, (b) TEM, and (c) HRTEM images of a carbon coated Janus Co/CoP-5 nanoparticle, (d) comparative XRD patterns, and (e) Co 2p XPS spectra of Co and Co/CoP-5 samples. (B) iR-corrected LSV data for (i) HER and (ii) OER over Co, Co/CoP-x (x = 3, 5, and 7), and CoP samples, and the corresponding Tafel slopes for (iii) HER and (iv) OER in a 1.0M KOH electrolyte (catalyst loading: 0.22 mg cm−2). (C) iR-corrected LSV curves of overall water electrolysis using Co/CoP-5 as bi-functional materials and corresponding chronopotentiometric curves in (a) and (b) 1.0M KOH, (c) and (d) 1.0M PBS, and (e) and (f) 0.5M H2SO4 (catalyst loading: 5.0 mg cm−2). Reprinted with permission from Xue et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 7(12), 1602355 (2017). Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

FIG. 17.

(A) (a) Schematic representation of the synthesis process of a Co/CoP-5 Janus nanoparticle, (b) TEM, and (c) HRTEM images of a carbon coated Janus Co/CoP-5 nanoparticle, (d) comparative XRD patterns, and (e) Co 2p XPS spectra of Co and Co/CoP-5 samples. (B) iR-corrected LSV data for (i) HER and (ii) OER over Co, Co/CoP-x (x = 3, 5, and 7), and CoP samples, and the corresponding Tafel slopes for (iii) HER and (iv) OER in a 1.0M KOH electrolyte (catalyst loading: 0.22 mg cm−2). (C) iR-corrected LSV curves of overall water electrolysis using Co/CoP-5 as bi-functional materials and corresponding chronopotentiometric curves in (a) and (b) 1.0M KOH, (c) and (d) 1.0M PBS, and (e) and (f) 0.5M H2SO4 (catalyst loading: 5.0 mg cm−2). Reprinted with permission from Xue et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 7(12), 1602355 (2017). Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Close modal

Li et al.221 designed Janus structured NiS/NiO nanoparticles, which were in situ encapsulated inside an N-doped carbon nanotube nanofiber with a trunk-shaped super-structure by electrospinning followed by calcination and vulcanization; due to the simultaneous effect of nano-architectonics and interfacial engineering, the as-synthesized Janus particles have increased oxygen vacancies, optimized electronic configuration, and good structural robustness and promoted mass diffusion channels. Moreover, they exhibited outstanding OER activity with a small overpotential of 269 mV at ∼10 mA/cm2 and a Tafel slope of 48.4 mV/decade, as depicted in Fig. 18. Several other JPs have been reported so far for OER, and Table IV lists a series of Janus particles used for OER along with various electrochemical parameters reported so far.

FIG. 18.

(A) Schematic showing a flow chart demonstrating the fabrication of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs. (B) and (C) The SEM images of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs. (D) The TEM image of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs. (E) LSV curves of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs, NiO@N–C NT/NFs, Ni@N–C NT/NFs, N-CNFs, and RuO2 at ∼10 mA cm−2 in 1.0M KOH. (F) Tafel slope for the materials. (G) Current density vs time curve at an overpotential of 300 mV; the inset shows LSV curves of the NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs before and after 3000 cycles between 1.3 and 1.5 V. Reprinted with permission from Li et al., Chem. Eng. J. 428, 131094 (2022). Copyright 2021 Elsevier, Inc.

FIG. 18.

(A) Schematic showing a flow chart demonstrating the fabrication of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs. (B) and (C) The SEM images of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs. (D) The TEM image of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs. (E) LSV curves of NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs, NiO@N–C NT/NFs, Ni@N–C NT/NFs, N-CNFs, and RuO2 at ∼10 mA cm−2 in 1.0M KOH. (F) Tafel slope for the materials. (G) Current density vs time curve at an overpotential of 300 mV; the inset shows LSV curves of the NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs before and after 3000 cycles between 1.3 and 1.5 V. Reprinted with permission from Li et al., Chem. Eng. J. 428, 131094 (2022). Copyright 2021 Elsevier, Inc.

Close modal
TABLE IV.

List of various Janus particles used for the oxygen evolution reaction along with different electrochemical parameters reported so far.

Janus particlesElectrolyte solutionOver potential (mV)Tafel (mV/decade)References
Cu3P@NF 1.0M KOH 320 (@10 mA/cm254 173  
Co/CoP-5 1.0M KOH 340 (@10 mA/cm279.5 151  
Ni2P/NiOx 1.0M KOH 290 (@10 mA/cm247 156  
Ni–P/CF 1.0M KOH 325 (@10 mA/cm2120 189  
(Ni–Co)12P5 1.0M KOH 340 (@10 mA/cm2143 222  
Ni–N4/GHSs/Fe–N4 0.1M KOH 390 (@10 mA/cm281 223  
CoMoP/CoP/NF 1.0M KOH 283 (@50 mA/cm272 175  
Cu3P–Cu2O/NPC 1M KOH 286 (@10 mA/cm279.02 171  
Ni@Co–Ni–P 1.0M KOH 300 (@29.6 mA/cm265.3 176  
Ni/Ni2P@N–CNF 1.0M KOH 285 (@10 mA/cm245.2 224  
Ni0.1Co0.91M PBS (phosphate buffer) ⋯ 133 155  
Co–Cu3P/CF 1M NaOH 270 (@50 mA/cm298 186  
NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs 1.0M KOH 269 (@10 mA/cm248.4 221  
Ce-α-Bi2O3-rGO 1.0M KOH 270 (@10 mA/cm254.6 212  
Janus particlesElectrolyte solutionOver potential (mV)Tafel (mV/decade)References
Cu3P@NF 1.0M KOH 320 (@10 mA/cm254 173  
Co/CoP-5 1.0M KOH 340 (@10 mA/cm279.5 151  
Ni2P/NiOx 1.0M KOH 290 (@10 mA/cm247 156  
Ni–P/CF 1.0M KOH 325 (@10 mA/cm2120 189  
(Ni–Co)12P5 1.0M KOH 340 (@10 mA/cm2143 222  
Ni–N4/GHSs/Fe–N4 0.1M KOH 390 (@10 mA/cm281 223  
CoMoP/CoP/NF 1.0M KOH 283 (@50 mA/cm272 175  
Cu3P–Cu2O/NPC 1M KOH 286 (@10 mA/cm279.02 171  
Ni@Co–Ni–P 1.0M KOH 300 (@29.6 mA/cm265.3 176  
Ni/Ni2P@N–CNF 1.0M KOH 285 (@10 mA/cm245.2 224  
Ni0.1Co0.91M PBS (phosphate buffer) ⋯ 133 155  
Co–Cu3P/CF 1M NaOH 270 (@50 mA/cm298 186  
NiS/NiO@N–C NT/NFs 1.0M KOH 269 (@10 mA/cm248.4 221  
Ce-α-Bi2O3-rGO 1.0M KOH 270 (@10 mA/cm254.6 212  

Photocatalysts for water splitting are preferred over electrocatalysts as they (electro-catalysts) require external energy to split water. Most of the time, this additional energy is supplied from non-renewable sources. A photocatalyst should have a suitable bandgap, effective carrier mobility, and band edge positions. By virtue of their band edge positions, large surface area, and tunable bandgap, a plethora of Janus materials have been suggested for photocatalytic applications for the generation of green hydrogen.

For a photocatalyst to utilize solar energy, the bandgap must be higher than 1.23 eV but lower than 3 eV.225 Incident photons having an energy equal to or greater than the material’s bandgap generates holes (in the valance band) and electrons (in the conduction band). Redox reactions then occur by migrating these photo-generated charged particles to the surface of the particles.226 The disadvantages of a single-phase semiconductor are its numerous shortcomings, such as chemical back radiation, low quantum efficiency, and charge recombination.227 Therefore, combining elements is often employed to provide favorable photocatalytic sites for redox reactions and increase efficiency.228 Moreover, as heterogeneous catalysis is a surface phenomenon, the change in morphology, size, shape, and functionality of the particle drastically alters the properties and efficiency of the catalysts,229 which has brought attention to JPs for photocatalytic evolution of hydrogen.

Photocatalysts are catalytically active species that can simultaneously perform reduction and oxidation reactions. When light is irradiated on a photocatalyst, the electrons’ energy in the material’s valance shell absorbs the energy of the photons. These excited electrons then jump to the conduction band, thus forming a hole in the valance band. The excited electron acts as a reducing agent, whereas the hole acts as an oxidizing agent.230 However, not all the photons that are incident on the catalysts lead to the generation of an exciton; some of them may recombine to generate heat or might be trapped as ions.231 

The absorption coefficient of an ideal semiconductor is given as

αE = α0 (E − Eg)/Eg (for direct semiconductor)or

αE = α0 (E − Eg)/Eg (for indirect semiconductor),where “α” is the absorption coefficient, “α0” is the intrinsic absorption coefficient of the semiconductor, and E represents the photon’s energy. From the above equations, it can be established that visible light can penetrate deeper into the material to develop electron–hole pairs than photons with higher wavelengths. One must also be careful while selecting the morphology of the catalyst. While a large cross-sectional area of the particles improves the photon-to-electron–hole conversion, smaller particle sizes lead to an increase in the surface area, which increases the number of incident photons and reduces migration distances of the electrons and holes.

The photocatalytic splitting of water for the generation of hydrogen consists of four primary steps: (a) generation of electron–hole pairs by irradiation of light on the photo-anode; (b) oxidation of water by the hole on the surface of the anode to produce H+ and O2−; (c) transfer of the as generated electron through an external circuit to the cathode; and finally, (d) reduction of H+ ions by the photoelectron at the cathode surface to generate H2.232 

Photocatalysts offer many advantages over electrocatalysts, viz., (a) it has a very simple setup where no special electrolytes or external circuits are required;233 (b) the reaction proceeds at normal temperature and pressure (NTP), which is less energy intensive;233 and (c) this reaction does not need to require any fuel-based energy sources and is eco-friendly.234 However, the disadvantages include (a) low quantum efficiencies;235 (b) low reproducibility of the reported rates;236 (c) scalability and fabrication of the materials;237 and (d) separation of products is difficult as generation of oxygen and hydrogen in the same reactor leads to undesired reverse reaction and generates water.233 In an typical example, Sun et al.238 reported the synthesis of [TiO2/C]//[Bi2WO6/C] carbon-based Janus nanofiber heterojunction, and the process is schematically illustrated in Fig. 19(A). The as-synthesized fiber’s carbon content was analyzed via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) [Fig. 19(B)], and the pore size distributions (whether the structure containing any micropores, mesopores, and macropores) were evaluated using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area. The specific surface area and average pore diameter of the Janus hybrid were found to be 29.64 m2 g−1 and 24 nm, respectively [Fig. 19(C)].238 The as-synthesized hybrid Janus fibers grew toward a certain orientation to form an array of nanofiber [Figs. 19(D) and 19(E)] and those Janus fibers showed excellent photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen production, as depicted in Figs. 19(F)19(I). Numerous first principle studies have been conducted to determine the feasibility of using Janus photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution; however, due to the complex nature of materials fabrication techniques, only a few have been synthesized until date, as listed in Table V.239 

FIG. 19.

(A) Schematic flow diagram representing the synthesis of a [TiO2/C]/[Bi2WO6/C] Janus nano-fiber. (B) TGA curve of the Janus nano-fiber calcined at 800 °C with different TiO2 contents. (C) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm and corresponding Pore size distribution curve (inset data) for the Janus nano-fiber, calcined at 800 °C. (D) and (E) SEM images of the fiber. (F) and (G) Cumulative production of hydrogen with different TiO2 content at 700 and 800 °C, respectively. (H) and (I) Hydrogen evolution rate with different TiO2 contents at 700 and 800 °C, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Sun et al., J. Alloys Compd. 830, 154673 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier, Inc.

FIG. 19.

(A) Schematic flow diagram representing the synthesis of a [TiO2/C]/[Bi2WO6/C] Janus nano-fiber. (B) TGA curve of the Janus nano-fiber calcined at 800 °C with different TiO2 contents. (C) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm and corresponding Pore size distribution curve (inset data) for the Janus nano-fiber, calcined at 800 °C. (D) and (E) SEM images of the fiber. (F) and (G) Cumulative production of hydrogen with different TiO2 content at 700 and 800 °C, respectively. (H) and (I) Hydrogen evolution rate with different TiO2 contents at 700 and 800 °C, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Sun et al., J. Alloys Compd. 830, 154673 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier, Inc.

Close modal
TABLE V.

Details of the preparation technique and precursors of some Janus photocatalytic materials.

MaterialSynthesis techniquePrecursorReferences
[TiO2/C]//[Bi2WO6/C] Electro-spinning Titanium dioxide, polyacrylonitrile, N, N-dimethylformamide, bismuth nitrate, ammonium tungstate 238  
MoSSe Chemical vapor deposition followed by selenization MoO3, S, and Se powder 240  
Cu1.94SZnS Thermal decomposition followed by cation exchange Copper (II) acetylacetonate, dodecanethiol ZnS 27  
MoSSe Chemical vapor deposition followed by sulfurization of monolayer MoSe2 MoSe2, sulfur powder 241  
MaterialSynthesis techniquePrecursorReferences
[TiO2/C]//[Bi2WO6/C] Electro-spinning Titanium dioxide, polyacrylonitrile, N, N-dimethylformamide, bismuth nitrate, ammonium tungstate 238  
MoSSe Chemical vapor deposition followed by selenization MoO3, S, and Se powder 240  
Cu1.94SZnS Thermal decomposition followed by cation exchange Copper (II) acetylacetonate, dodecanethiol ZnS 27  
MoSSe Chemical vapor deposition followed by sulfurization of monolayer MoSe2 MoSe2, sulfur powder 241  

In summary, Janus, a class of materials, has been widely researched in recent years. These materials, along with posing a mirror asymmetry, also display a wide range of significantly unique electronic properties, such as piezoelectric properties, tunable bandgap, and the Rashba effect, thus putting these materials to great use in electronic devices, such as sensors, actuators, spintronics, energy harvesting, and so on. Posing two or more different faces, JPs can be used for a vast pool of applications, including biomedical applications (especially for drug delivery and tissue regeneration), optics, and catalysis (especially electrocatalysis). Moreover, one significant advantage that Janus poses over other nanomaterials is that a single Janus particle can be utilized to attach different chemical functionalities on its different faces. Interestingly, clean and green hydrogen shows us a beacon of hope in the world amid an energy crisis.

In contrast, commercial adaptation of hydrogen as an alternative to fossil fuels requires using less expensive, earth-abundant elements as catalysts. Over the past few years, numerous breakthroughs have been achieved in fabricating materials with near noble metal-like catalytic efficiencies. In this regard, it has been observed that Janus particles, with their anisotropy and multi-functionality, offer catalytic performance over their counterparts. This Review summarizes the different synthesis processes for fabricating Janus particles, including microfluidics, self-assembly, seeded nucleation, and surface nucleation. Next, we summarize the applications of Janus particles in the electrocatalytic splitting of water. Specifically, we focus on evaluating the performances of various JPs in various segments of other water electrolysis, which results in superior catalytic performances. Indeed, JPs combine the properties of the individual components, coupled with their asymmetry, anisotropy, and multi-functionality. This could be extremely useful for devices involving multi-directional reactions (e.g., electrolyzer, HER, and OER). Janus particles outperform most non-noble metal-based catalysts, particularly for multi-functional applications. However, there is still much room for improvement in various aspects of JP synthesis and applications. For instance, not all Janus catalysts are pH universal; most of them operate in chloro-alkali, acid-water, water-alkali, or neutral electrolysis cells. The pH universality of the Janus HER catalyst will broaden the scope of application of these catalysts even further.

Similarly, the majority of the Janus catalysts are not used for overall water splitting, while some Janus electrocatalysts can be used for both HER and OER, which serves as a cost-effective way for water electrolysis. Successfully fabricating more JPs would pave the way for the accelerated adaptation of these catalysts for real-life applications. Since it is challenging and expensive to fabricate JPs, it is required to develop a cost-effective and simple fabrication process for JP synthesis while scaling them up toward commercial application.

Since these materials are a very recently researched domain, there are many challenges associated with the fabrication and use of these materials, apart from their application in the biomedical. Theoretically, many advances have been made to this field of special-class of emerging materials; however, practically, limited such materials have been synthesized to date. For example, one of those is two-dimensional (2D) MoSSe, which manifests that the fabrication of such a particular class of materials needs more profound study. Regardless of the many versatilities in a single particle, considerable advancements are still necessary to make Janus particles in currently manifested immensely complicated synthesis techniques and small-scale production. From the materials science perspective, evaluating several theories and methodologies to aim and broaden the synthesis techniques of Janus particles methodically is of the most significant importance. Thus, more consistent research and repetition of existing methods will amplify the know-how while continuously innovating several physical and chemical properties of Janus materials, which are not yet explored. In brief, composition, particle size, morphology, and surface modification will typically affect the JP’s applications toward the design, synthesis, and catalytic applications; thereby, strategies need to be developed to systematically arrange those functionalities toward a certain goal of specialized applications. Several major issues and challenges related to water electrolysis applications still prevail, and those have to be addressed. First, it is rather challenging to form multifaceted or multifunction JPs with diverse properties, which could have immense potential to open up many other novel applications. Second, very few JPs are available, which could act as catalysts on overall water splitting, i.e., a JP could act as both HER and OER catalysts. Focusing on such aspects will significantly reduce the catalysts’ cost and accelerate commercial adaptation. In addition, there is still room to improve the catalytic activity of JPs and bring down the overpotential and Tafel slope while improving stability. Finally, it is essential to develop JPs with high catalytic activities in all pH ranges, which could have added advantages of improving water electrolysis efficiencies without any pH effect.

Despite many intriguing advances in JPs for catalytic applications that have already been demonstrated, many other challenges persist in developing simple and scalable synthesis strategies and constructing non-corrosive and non-toxic JPs with excellent HER/OER efficiency. It is also crucial to design JPs with both self-propelled and self-controlled properties and understand JPs’ working mechanism with all catalytic applications. In particular, many published papers reported that Janus particles present superior performance as electrocatalysts (both HER/OER) compared with conventional homogeneous particles; however, in major cases, the mechanism of how Janus particles work is entirely unknown. With the rapidly growing interest in JPs, it is highly required to understand the working mechanism of how the surface and structural anisotropy of JPs work for the water electrolysis reactions. The basic understanding will propel further toward designing JPs, benefiting JPs’ catalytic applications. Last but not least, the above discussions undoubtedly need a long way to go, while meticulous efforts are necessary to address these challenges one by one. To this end, we hope this Review will pave the way for many novel Janus particle syntheses while providing an integral understanding of the design, processing, and functionalities of Janus catalysts, simultaneously stimulating further interest in expanding the horizon in water electrolysis.

Dr. Santanu Das (S.D.) gratefully acknowledges the STARS Project from the Ministry of Education, Government of India (Grant No. STARS/APR2019/NS/428/FS), and SERB Core Research grant (Grant No. CRG/2022/003204) for providing the financial support for this work. S.D. also acknowledges the UGC-DAE consortium (Grant No. CRS-IC-ISUM-41/CRS-324/2019-20/1376) for providing financial support for this work.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Sayak Roy: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal). Ummiya Qamar: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting). Assa Aravindh Sasikala Devi: Conceptualization (supporting); Methodology (lead); Resources (supporting); Software (equal); Validation (supporting). Santanu Das: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (equal); Project administration (equal); Resources (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
P.-G.
de Gennes
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
31
(
7
),
842
(
1992
).
2.
A.
Walther
and
A. H. E.
Müller
,
Chem. Rev.
113
(
7
),
5194
(
2013
).
3.
J.
Hu
,
S.
Zhou
,
Y.
Sun
,
X.
Fang
, and
L.
Wu
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
41
(
11
),
4356
(
2012
).
4.
J.
Du
and
R. K.
O’Reilly
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
40
(
5
),
2402
(
2011
);
[PubMed]
X.
Li
,
L.
Chen
,
D.
Cui
,
W.
Jiang
,
L.
Han
, and
N.
Niu
,
Coord. Chem. Rev.
454
,
214318
(
2022
).
5.
X.
Pang
,
C.
Wan
,
M.
Wang
, and
Z.
Lin
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
53
(
22
),
5524
(
2014
).
6.
T.
Nisisako
,
T.
Torii
,
T.
Takahashi
, and
Y.
Takizawa
,
Adv. Mater.
18
(
9
),
1152
(
2006
).
7.
F.
Tu
and
D.
Lee
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
136
(
28
),
9999
(
2014
).
8.
K. P.
Yuet
,
D. K.
Hwang
,
R.
Haghgooie
, and
P. S.
Doyle
,
Langmuir
26
(
6
),
4281
(
2010
).
9.
S.
Simoncelli
,
J.
Summer
,
S.
Nedev
,
P.
Kühler
, and
J.
Feldmann
,
Small
12
(
21
),
2854
(
2016
).
10.
F.
Wurm
and
A. F. M.
Kilbinger
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
48
(
45
),
8412
(
2009
).
11.
Z.
Wu
,
L.
Li
,
T.
Liao
,
X.
Chen
,
W.
Jiang
,
W.
Luo
,
J.
Yang
, and
Z.
Sun
,
Nano Today
22
,
62
(
2018
).
12.
S. M. M.
Ehteshami
and
S. H.
Chan
,
Energy Policy
73
,
103
(
2014
).
13.
M.
Yue
,
H.
Lambert
,
E.
Pahon
,
R.
Roche
,
S.
Jemei
, and
D.
Hissel
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
146
,
111180
(
2021
);
S.
Anantharaj
,
S. R.
Ede
,
K.
Karthick
,
S.
Sam Sankar
,
K.
Sangeetha
,
P. E.
Karthik
, and
S.
Kundu
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
11
(
4
),
744
(
2018
).
14.
J.
Yu
,
Y.
Dai
,
Q.
He
,
C.
Cheng
,
Z.
Shao
, and
M.
Ni
,
Appl. Phys. Rev.
7
(
4
),
041304
(
2020
).
15.
J.
Mohammed-Ibrahim
and
X.
Sun
,
J. Energy Chem.
34
,
111
(
2019
);
Y.
Yan
,
B. Y.
Xia
,
Z.
Xu
, and
X.
Wang
,
ACS Catal.
4
(
6
),
1693
(
2014
);
J.
Zhu
,
L.
Hu
,
P.
Zhao
,
L. Y. S.
Lee
, and
K.-Y.
Wong
,
Chem. Rev.
120
(
2
),
851
(
2020
);
[PubMed]
J.
Wang
,
F.
Xu
,
H.
Jin
,
Y.
Chen
, and
Y.
Wang
,
Adv. Mater.
29
(
14
),
1605838
(
2017
).
16.
M.
Gong
,
D.-Y.
Wang
,
C.-C.
Chen
,
B.-J.
Hwang
, and
H.
Dai
,
Nano Res.
9
(
1
),
28
(
2016
);
T.
Li
,
T.
Hu
,
L.
Dai
, and
C. M.
Li
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
8
(
45
),
23674
(
2020
);
Z.
Ge
,
B.
Fu
,
J.
Zhao
,
X.
Li
,
B.
Ma
, and
Y.
Chen
,
J. Mater. Sci.
55
(
29
),
14081
(
2020
);
A.
Eftekhari
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
42
(
16
),
11053
(
2017
);
V. K.
Singh
,
B.
Mukherjee
,
S.
Assa Aravindh
, and
S.
Das
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
609
,
155354
(
2023
).
17.
S.
Das
,
U.
Sharma
,
B.
Mukherjee
,
A. A.
Sasikala Devi
, and
J.
Velusamy
,
Nanotechnology
34
(
14
),
145202
(
2023
).
18.
V. K.
Singh
,
P.
Jain
,
S.
Panda
,
B. K.
Kuila
,
S.
Pitchaimuthu
, and
S.
Das
,
New J. Chem.
46
,
13636
(
2022
).
19.
U.
Sharma
,
S.
Karazhanov
,
R.
Jose
, and
S.
Das
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
10
,
8626
(
2022
).
20.
U.
Sharma
,
S.
Karazhanov
,
N.
Alonso-Vante
, and
S.
Das
,
Curr. Opin. Electrochem.
35
,
101067
(
2022
).
21.
V. K.
Singh
,
U.
Gupta
,
B.
Mukherjee
,
S.
Chattopadhyay
, and
S.
Das
,
ACS Appl. Nano Mater.
4
(
1
),
886
(
2021
).
22.
U.
Gupta
,
D.
Gautam
,
V.
Jain
, and
B.
Mukherjee
, in
2D Nanoscale Heterostructured Materials
, edited by
S.
Jit
and
S.
Das
(
Elsevier
,
2020
), p.
13
.
23.
J.
Zhang
,
B. A.
Grzybowski
, and
S.
Granick
,
Langmuir
33
(
28
),
6964
(
2017
).
24.
H.
Su
,
C. A.
Hurd Price
,
L.
Jing
,
Q.
Tian
,
J.
Liu
, and
K.
Qian
,
Mater. Today Bio
4
,
100033
(
2019
).
25.
J.-W.
Kim
,
D.
Lee
,
Ho C.
Shum
, and
D. A.
Weitz
,
Adv. Mater.
20
(
17
),
3239
(
2008
).
26.
C.-C.
Lin
,
C.-W.
Liao
,
Yi-C.
Chao
, and
C.
Kuo
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
2
(
11
),
3185
(
2010
).
27.
X.
Guo
,
S.
Liu
,
W.
Wang
,
C.
Zhu
,
C.
Li
,
Y.
Yang
,
Q.
Tian
, and
Y.
Liu
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
600
,
838
(
2021
).
28.
B.
Shang
,
Y.
Wang
,
B.
Peng
, and
Z.
Deng
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
509
,
145360
(
2020
).
29.
T.
Ouchi
,
R.
Nakamura
,
T.
Suzuki
, and
H.
Minami
,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
58
(
46
),
20996
(
2019
).
30.
A.
Walther
,
X.
André
,
M.
Drechsler
,
V.
Abetz
, and
A. H. E.
Müller
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
129
(
19
),
6187
(
2007
).
31.
S.
Bhaskar
,
K. M.
Pollock
,
M.
Yoshida
, and
J.
Lahann
,
Small
6
(
3
),
404
(
2010
).
32.
T.
Yang
,
L.
Wei
,
L.
Jing
,
J.
Liang
,
X.
Zhang
,
M.
Tang
,
M. J.
Monteiro
,
Y.
Chen
,
Y.
Wang
,
S.
Gu
,
D.
Zhao
,
H.
Yang
,
J.
Liu
, and
G. Q. M.
Lu
, “
Dumbbell-shaped Bi-component mesoporous Janus solid nanoparticles for biphasic interface catalysis
,”
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
56
(
29
),
8459
(
2017
).
33.
Y.
Yin
,
S.
Zhou
,
B.
You
, and
L.
Wu
,
J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.
49
(
15
),
3272
(
2011
).
34.
F.
Liang
,
K.
Shen
,
X.
Qu
,
C.
Zhang
,
Q.
Wang
,
J.
Li
,
J.
Liu
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
50
(
10
),
2379
(
2011
).
35.
J.
Yuan
,
W.
Zhao
,
M.
Pan
, and
L.
Zhu
,
Macromol. Rapid Commun.
37
(
15
),
1282
(
2016
).
36.
A.
Kumar
,
B. J.
Park
,
F.
Tu
, and
D.
Lee
,
Soft Matter
9
(
29
),
6604
(
2013
);
Y.
Song
,
J.
Zhou
,
J.-B.
Fan
,
W.
Zhai
,
J.
Meng
, and
S.
Wang
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
28
(
32
),
1802493
(
2018
).
37.
S.
Wang
and
N.
Wu
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
6
(
22
),
20164
(
2014
).
38.
A.
Kirillova
,
C.
Marschelke
, and
A.
Synytska
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
11
(
10
),
9643
(
2019
).
39.
E.
Shaviv
,
O.
Schubert
,
M.
Alves-Santos
,
G.
Goldoni
,
R.
Di Felice
,
F.
Vallée
,
N.
Del Fatti
,
U.
Banin
, and
C.
Sönnichsen
,
ACS Nano
5
(
6
),
4712
(
2011
).
40.
W.
Cao
,
R.
Huang
,
W.
Qi
,
R.
Su
, and
Z.
He
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
7
(
1
),
465
(
2015
).
41.
L.
Dong
,
J.
Lou
, and
V. B.
Shenoy
,
ACS Nano
11
(
8
),
8242
(
2017
).
42.
S.
Daradmare
,
H. S.
Lee
,
T. S.
Seo
, and
B. J.
Park
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
627
,
375
(
2022
).
43.
L.
Zhang
,
Z.
Yang
,
T.
Gong
,
R.
Pan
,
H.
Wang
,
Z.
Guo
,
H.
Zhang
, and
X.
Fu
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
8
(
18
),
8813
(
2020
).
44.
A.
Perro
,
S.
Reculusa
,
F.
Pereira
,
M.-H.
Delville
,
C.
Mingotaud
,
E.
Duguet
,
E.
Bourgeat-Lami
, and
S.
Ravaine
,
Chem. Commun.
44
,
5542
(
2005
).
45.
Y.
Song
and
S.
Chen
,
Chem. - Asian J.
9
(
2
),
418
(
2014
).
46.
H.
Zhu
,
T.
Cai
,
Y.
Yuan
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Nagaoka
,
J.
Zhao
,
Z.
Liu
,
R.
Li
, and
O.
Chen
,
ACS Appl. Nano Mater.
2
(
11
),
6804
(
2019
).
47.
I.
Schick
,
S.
Lorenz
,
D.
Gehrig
,
A.-M.
Schilmann
,
H.
Bauer
,
M.
Panthöfer
,
K.
Fischer
,
D.
Strand
,
F.
Laquai
, and
W.
Tremel
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
136
(
6
),
2473
(
2014
).
48.
A.
Kirillova
,
C.
Schliebe
,
G.
Stoychev
,
A.
Jakob
,
H.
Lang
, and
A.
Synytska
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
7
(
38
),
21218
(
2015
).
49.
R.
Deng
,
F.
Liang
,
X.
Qu
,
Q.
Wang
,
J.
Zhu
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Macromolecules
48
(
3
),
750
(
2015
).
50.
L.
Qu
,
H.
Hu
,
J.
Yu
,
X.
Yu
,
J.
Liu
,
Y.
Xu
, and
Q.
Zhang
,
Langmuir
33
(
21
),
5269
(
2017
).
51.
W.
Ding
,
Y.
Li
,
H.
Xia
,
D.
Wang
, and
X.
Tao
,
ACS Nano
8
(
11
),
11206
(
2014
).
52.
W.
Lv
,
K. J.
Lee
,
J.
Li
,
T.-H.
Park
,
S.
Hwang
,
A. J.
Hart
,
F.
Zhang
, and
J.
Lahann
,
Small
8
(
20
),
3116
(
2012
).
53.
S.-H.
Hu
and
X.
Gao
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
132
(
21
),
7234
(
2010
).
54.
B.
Liu
,
J.
Liu
,
F.
Liang
,
Q.
Wang
,
C.
Zhang
,
X.
Qu
,
J.
Li
,
D.
Qiu
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Macromolecules
45
(
12
),
5176
(
2012
).
55.
C.
Tang
,
C.
Zhang
,
J.
Liu
,
X.
Qu
,
J.
Li
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Macromolecules
43
(
11
),
5114
(
2010
).
56.
Al C.
de Leon
,
B. J.
Rodier
,
Q.
Luo
,
C. M.
Hemmingsen
,
P.
Wei
,
K.
Abbasi
,
R.
Advincula
, and
E. B.
Pentzer
,
ACS Nano
11
(
7
),
7485
(
2017
).
57.
J.-W.
Kim
,
R. J.
Larsen
, and
D. A.
Weitz
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
128
(
44
),
14374
(
2006
).
58.
R.
Suzuki
,
Y.
Yamauchi
, and
Y.
Sugahara
,
Dalton Trans.
51
(
35
),
13145
(
2022
).
59.
P.
Calvo-Marzal
,
K. M.
Manesh
,
D.
Kagan
,
S.
Balasubramanian
,
M.
Cardona
,
G.-U.
Flechsig
,
J.
Posner
, and
J.
Wang
,
Chem. Commun.
2009
(
30
),
4509
(
2009
).
60.
M. D.
McConnell
,
M. J.
Kraeutler
,
S.
Yang
, and
R. J.
Composto
,
Nano Lett.
10
(
2
),
603
(
2010
).
61.
X.
Ma
,
K.
Hahn
, and
S.
Sanchez
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
137
(
15
),
4976
(
2015
).
62.
T.
Teranishi
,
M.
Saruyama
, and
M.
Kanehara
,
Nanoscale
1
(
2
),
225
(
2009
).
63.
Z.
Zhang
and
S. C.
Glotzer
,
Nano Lett.
4
(
8
),
1407
(
2004
);
[PubMed]
H.
Gu
,
Z.
Yang
,
J.
Gao
,
C. K.
Chang
, and
B.
Xu
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
127
(
1
),
34
(
2005
).
[PubMed]
64.
M.
Xuan
,
Z.
Wu
,
J.
Shao
,
L.
Dai
,
T.
Si
, and
Q.
He
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
138
(
20
),
6492
(
2016
).
65.
L. R.
Rowe
,
B. S.
Chapman
, and
J. B.
Tracy
,
Chem. Mater.
30
(
18
),
6249
(
2018
).
66.
Y. L.
Lyubarskaya
and
A. A.
Shestopalov
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
5
(
15
),
7323
(
2013
).
67.
T.
Chen
,
M.
Yang
,
X.
Wang
,
Li H.
Tan
, and
H.
Chen
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130
(
36
),
11858
(
2008
).
68.
L.
Liu
,
T. D.
Dao
,
R.
Kodiyath
,
Q.
Kang
,
H.
Abe
,
T.
Nagao
, and
J.
Ye
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
24
(
48
),
7754
(
2014
).
69.
X.
Li
,
L.
Zhou
,
Y.
Wei
,
A. M.
El-Toni
,
F.
Zhang
, and
D.
Zhao
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
136
(
42
),
15086
(
2014
);
[PubMed]
Y.
Liu
,
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Shao
,
R.
Deng
,
J.
Zhu
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Prog. Mater. Sci.
124
,
100888
(
2022
).
70.
J.
Faria
,
M. P.
Ruiz
, and
D. E.
Resasco
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
352
(
14–15
),
2359
(
2010
).
71.
X.
Chen
,
J.
Xu
,
D.
Sun
,
B.
Jiang
,
F.
Liang
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Langmuir
35
(
18
),
6032
(
2019
).
72.
Y.
Liu
,
R.
Dai
,
Q.
Wei
,
W.
Li
,
G.
Zhu
,
H.
Chi
,
Z.
Guo
,
L.
Wang
,
C.
Cui
,
J.
Xu
, and
K.
Ma
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
11
(
47
),
44582
(
2019
).
73.
Y.
Chen
,
H.
Yang
,
C.
Zhang
,
Q.
Wang
,
X.
Qu
,
J.
Li
,
F.
Liang
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Macromolecules
46
(
10
),
4126
(
2013
).
74.
B.
Liu
,
C.
Zhang
,
J.
Liu
,
X.
Qu
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Chem. Commun.
2009
(
26
),
3871
(
2009
).
75.
S.
Razavi
,
L. M.
Hernandez
,
A.
Read
,
W. L.
Vargas
, and
I.
Kretzschmar
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
558
,
95
(
2020
).
76.
E. B.
Mock
and
C. F.
Zukoski
,
Langmuir
26
(
17
),
13747
(
2010
).
77.
L.
Zhang
,
M.
Zhang
,
L.
Zhou
,
Q.
Han
,
X.
Chen
,
S.
Li
,
L.
Li
,
Z.
Su
, and
C.
Wang
,
Biomaterials
181
,
113
(
2018
);
[PubMed]
S.
Li
,
L.
Zhang
,
X.
Chen
,
T.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhao
,
L.
Li
, and
C.
Wang
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
28
),
24137
(
2018
).
[PubMed]
78.
B.
Han
,
W.
Xia
,
K.
Liu
,
F.
Tian
,
Y.
Chen
,
X.
Wang
,
F.
Liang
, and
Z.
Yang
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
10
),
8519
(
2018
).
79.
B.
Greydanus
,
D. K.
Schwartz
, and
J. W.
Medlin
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
2
),
2338
(
2020
).
80.
Q.
Wang
,
A.
Xiao
,
Z.
Shen
, and
X.-H.
Fan
,
Polymer Chem.
10
(
3
),
372
(
2019
);
X.
Qiang
,
A.
Steinhaus
,
C.
Chen
,
R.
Chakroun
, and
A. H.
Gröschel
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
58
(
21
),
7122
(
2019
);
K.
Sansanaphongpricha
,
M. C.
DeSantis
,
H.
Chen
,
W.
Cheng
,
K.
Sun
,
B.
Wen
, and
D.
Sun
,
Small
13
(
6
),
1602569
(
2017
).
81.
M.
Fan
,
Y.
Zheng
,
A.
Li
,
K.
Li
,
H.
Liu
, and
Z.-A.
Qiao
,
Catal. Sci. Technol.
8
(
14
),
3695
(
2018
).
82.
S.
Yang
,
F.
Guo
,
B.
Kiraly
,
X.
Mao
,
M.
Lu
,
K. W.
Leong
, and
T. J.
Huang
,
Lab Chip
12
(
12
),
2097
(
2012
).
83.
F.
Chang
,
B. G. P.
van Ravensteijn
,
K. S.
Lacina
, and
W. K.
Kegel
,
ACS Macro Lett.
8
(
6
),
714
(
2019
);
[PubMed]
S.
Hosseinzadeh
and
Y.
Saadat
,
RSC Adv.
5
(
44
),
35325
(
2015
);
T. S.
Skelhon
,
Y.
Chen
, and
S. A. F.
Bon
,
Langmuir
30
(
45
),
13525
(
2014
).
[PubMed]
84.
Y.
Lan
,
J.
Choi
,
H.
Li
,
Y.
Jia
,
R.
Huang
,
K. J.
Stebe
, and
D.
Lee
,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
58
(
46
),
20961
(
2019
).
85.
D.
Rodríguez-Fernández
and
L. M.
Liz-Marzán
,
Part. Part. Syst. Charact.
30
(
1
),
46
(
2013
);
L.
Liu
,
M.
Ren
, and
W.
Yang
,
Langmuir
25
(
18
),
11048
(
2009
).
[PubMed]
86.
X.
Fan
,
J.
Yang
,
X. J.
Loh
, and
Z.
Li
,
Macromol. Rapid Commun.
40
(
5
),
1800203
(
2019
).
87.
R.
Kadam
,
J.
Ghawali
,
M.
Waespy
,
M.
Maas
, and
K.
Rezwan
,
Nanoscale
12
(
36
),
18938
(
2020
).
88.
Y.-C.
Chao
,
W.-H.
Huang
,
K.-M.
Cheng
, and
C.
Kuo
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
6
(
6
),
4338
(
2014
);
[PubMed]
S.
Ye
and
R.
Lloyd Carroll
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
2
(
3
),
616
(
2010
).
[PubMed]
89.
B. G.
Cha
,
Y.
Piao
, and
J.
Kim
,
Mater. Res. Bull.
70
,
424
(
2015
);
M.
Ito
,
R.
Enomoto
,
K.
Osawa
,
Y.
Daiko
,
T.
Yazawa
,
S.
Fujii
,
Y.
Yokoyama
,
Y.
Miyanari
,
Y.
Nakamura
,
A.
Nakao
,
Y.
Iwasaki
, and
S.-i.
Yusa
,
Polym. J.
44
(
2
),
181
(
2012
);
J.
Christopher Love
,
B. D.
Gates
,
D. B.
Wolfe
,
K. E.
Paul
, and
G. M.
Whitesides
,
Nano Lett.
2
(
8
),
891
(
2002
).
90.
S. K.
Smoukov
,
S.
Gangwal
,
M.
Marquez
, and
O. D.
Velev
,
Soft Matter
5
(
6
),
1285
(
2009
);
H.
Takei
and
N.
Shimizu
,
Langmuir
13
(
7
),
1865
(
1997
).
91.
C.
Zhang
,
W.
Wei
,
F.
Liang
, and
Z.
Yang
, in
Janus Particle Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications
, edited by
S.
Jiang
and
S.
Granick
(
The Royal Society of Chemistry
,
2012
).
92.
E.
Poggi
and
J.-F.
Gohy
,
Colloid Polym. Sci.
295
(
11
),
2083
(
2017
).
93.
J. K.
Lim
,
J. W.
Ciszek
,
F.
Huo
,
J.-W.
Jang
,
S.
Hwang
, and
C. A.
Mirkin
,
Nano Lett.
8
(
12
),
4441
(
2008
);
[PubMed]
S.
Park
,
J.-H.
Lim
,
S.-W.
Chung
, and
C. A.
Mirkin
,
Science
303
(
5656
),
348
(
2004
);
[PubMed]
F. S.
Ou
,
M. M.
Shaijumon
, and
P. M.
Ajayan
,
Nano Lett.
8
(
7
),
1853
(
2008
).
[PubMed]
94.
M. J.
Kloberg
,
H.
Yu
,
E.
Groß
,
F.
Eckmann
,
T. M. F.
Restle
,
T. F.
Fässler
,
J. G. C.
Veinot
, and
B.
Rieger
,
Adv. Mater.
33
(
38
),
2100288
(
2021
).
95.
D. M.
Andala
,
S. H. R.
Shin
,
H.-Y.
Lee
, and
K. J. M.
Bishop
,
ACS Nano
6
(
2
),
1044
(
2012
).
96.
Z.
Nie
,
W.
Li
,
M.
Seo
,
S.
Xu
, and
E.
Kumacheva
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
128
(
29
),
9408
(
2006
).
97.
S.-N.
Yin
,
C.-F.
Wang
,
Z.-Y.
Yu
,
J.
Wang
,
S.-S.
Liu
, and
S.
Chen
,
Adv. Mater.
23
(
26
),
2915
(
2011
).
98.
S.
Lone
and
In W.
Cheong
,
RSC Adv.
4
(
26
),
13322
(
2014
).
99.
T.
Nisisako
and
T.
Torii
,
Adv. Mater.
19
(
11
),
1489
(
2007
).
100.
J.
Lan
,
J.
Chen
,
N.
Li
,
X.
Ji
,
M.
Yu
, and
Z.
He
,
Talanta
151
,
126
(
2016
).
101.
Y.
Wang
,
M.
Shang
,
Y.
Wang
, and
Z.
Xu
,
Anal. Methods
11
(
31
),
3966
(
2019
).
102.
R. K.
Shah
,
J.-W.
Kim
, and
D. A.
Weitz
,
Adv. Mater.
21
(
19
),
1949
(
2009
).
103.
K. D.
Seo
,
J.
Doh
, and
D. S.
Kim
,
Langmuir
29
(
49
),
15137
(
2013
).
104.
I. U.
Khan
,
C. A.
Serra
,
N.
Anton
,
X.
Li
,
R.
Akasov
,
N.
Messaddeq
,
I.
Kraus
, and
T. F.
Vandamme
,
Int. J. Pharm.
473
(
1–2
),
239
(
2014
).
105.
S.
Ghosh
and
P.
Schurtenberger
,
Colloids Surf., A
573
,
205
(
2019
).
106.
M.
Marquis
,
J.
Davy
,
B.
Cathala
,
A.
Fang
, and
D.
Renard
,
Carbohydr. Polym.
116
,
189
(
2015
);
[PubMed]
N.
Weigel
,
Y.
Li
,
J.
Thiele
, and
A.
Fery
,
Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.
64
,
101673
(
2023
);
G.-X.
Li
,
X.-W.
Qu
,
L.-W.
Hao
,
Q.
Li
, and
S.
Chen
,
J. Polym. Sci.
60
(
11
),
1710
(
2022
).
107.
108.
A.
Honciuc
, in
Flowing Matter
, edited by
F.
Toschi
and
M.
Sega
(
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
,
2019
), p.
95
.
109.
Q.
Chen
,
J. K.
Whitmer
,
S.
Jiang
,
S. C.
Bae
,
E.
Luijten
, and
S.
Granick
,
Science
331
(
6014
),
199
(
2011
).
110.
L.-J.
Ren
,
H.-K.
Liu
,
H.
Wu
,
M.-B.
Hu
, and
W.
Wang
,
Adv. Mater.
32
(
3
),
1805863
(
2020
).
111.
X.
Zhang
,
Q.
Fu
,
H.
Duan
,
J.
Song
, and
H.
Yang
,
ACS Nano
15
(
4
),
6147
(
2021
).
112.
V. V.
Palyulin
and
I. I.
Potemkin
,
Macromolecules
41
(
12
),
4459
(
2008
);
Y.
Han
and
W.
Jiang
,
J. Phys. Chem. B
115
(
10
),
2167
(
2011
).
[PubMed]
113.
R.
Deng
,
F.
Liang
,
J.
Zhu
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Mater. Chem. Front.
1
(
3
),
431
(
2017
).
114.
J.
Song
,
B.
Wu
,
Z.
Zhou
,
G.
Zhu
,
Y.
Liu
,
Z.
Yang
,
L.
Lin
,
G.
Yu
,
F.
Zhang
,
G.
Zhang
,
H.
Duan
,
G. D.
Stucky
, and
X.
Chen
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
56
(
28
),
8110
(
2017
).
115.
L.
Jiang
,
M.
Xie
,
J.
Dou
,
H.
Li
,
X.
Huang
, and
D.
Chen
,
ACS Macro Lett.
7
(
11
),
1278
(
2018
).
116.
L.
Nie
,
S.
Liu
,
W.
Shen
,
D.
Chen
, and
M.
Jiang
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
46
(
33
),
6321
(
2007
).
117.
X.
Liang
,
C.
Gao
,
L.
Cui
,
S.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
, and
Z.
Dai
,
Adv. Mater.
29
(
40
),
1703135
(
2017
).
118.
A. H.
Gröschel
,
A.
Walther
,
T. I.
Löbling
,
J.
Schmelz
,
A.
Hanisch
,
H.
Schmalz
, and
A. H. E.
Müller
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
134
(
33
),
13850
(
2012
).
119.
L.
Cheng
,
G.
Hou
,
J.
Miao
,
D.
Chen
,
M.
Jiang
, and
L.
Zhu
,
Macromolecules
41
(
21
),
8159
(
2008
).
120.
W.
Ramsden
and
F.
Gotch
,
Proc. R. Soc. London
72
(
477–486
),
156
(
1997
).
121.
S. U.
Pickering
,
J. Chem. Soc., Trans.
91
,
2001
(
1907
).
122.
Y.
Gao
,
X.
Wu
, and
C.
Qi
,
Langmuir
36
(
39
),
11467
(
2020
).
123.
A. D.
Dinsmore
,
M. F.
Hsu
,
M. G.
Nikolaides
,
M.
Marquez
,
A. R.
Bausch
, and
D. A.
Weitz
,
Science
298
(
5595
),
1006
(
2002
);
[PubMed]
C.
Kaewsaneha
,
P.
Tangboriboonrat
,
D.
Polpanich
,
M.
Eissa
, and
A.
Elaissari
,
Colloids Surf., A
439
,
35
(
2013
).
124.
L.
Hong
,
S.
Jiang
, and
S.
Granick
,
Langmuir
22
(
23
),
9495
(
2006
).
125.
Y.
Umeda
,
T.
Kobayashi
,
T.
Hirai
, and
D.
Suzuki
,
Colloid Polym. Sci.
289
(
5
),
729
(
2011
);
J. H.
Park
,
N.
Han
,
J. E.
Song
, and
E. C.
Cho
,
Macromol. Rapid Commun.
38
(
3
),
1600621
(
2017
).
126.
C.
Huang
and
X.
Shen
,
Chem. Commun.
50
(
20
),
2646
(
2014
).
127.
Z.
Wang
,
F. P. J. T.
Rutjes
, and
J. C. M.
van Hest
,
Chem. Commun.
50
(
93
),
14550
(
2014
).
128.
B. T.
McGrail
,
J. D.
Mangadlao
,
B. J.
Rodier
,
J.
Swisher
,
R.
Advincula
, and
E.
Pentzer
,
Chem. Commun.
52
(
2
),
288
(
2016
).
129.
N.
Zahn
and
G.
Kickelbick
,
Colloids Surf., A
461
,
142
(
2014
);
D.
Mendez-Gonzalez
,
P.
Alonso-Cristobal
,
E.
Lopez-Cabarcos
, and
J.
Rubio-Retama
,
Eur. Polym. J.
75
,
363
(
2016
).
130.
S.
Saad
,
H.
Kaur
, and
G.
Natale
,
Langmuir
36
(
42
),
12590
(
2020
).
131.
A.
Perro
,
F.
Meunier
,
V. .
Schmitt
, and
S.
Ravaine
,
Colloids Surf., A
332
(
1
),
57
(
2009
).
132.
Y.
Xia
,
X.
Na
,
J.
Wu
, and
G.
Ma
,
Adv. Mater.
31
(
38
),
1801159
(
2019
);
M.
Okubo
,
N.
Saito
, and
T.
Fujibayashi
,
Colloid Polym. Sci.
283
(
6
),
691
(
2005
).
133.
L.-T.-C.
Tran
,
S.
Lesieur
, and
V.
Faivre
,
Expert Opin. Drug Delivery
11
(
7
),
1061
(
2014
).
134.
A. M.
Percebom
and
L. H. M.
Costa
,
Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
269
,
256
(
2019
).
135.
A.
Steinhaus
,
R.
Chakroun
,
M.
Müllner
,
T.-L.
Nghiem
,
M.
Hildebrandt
, and
A. H.
Gröschel
,
ACS Nano
13
(
6
),
6269
(
2019
).
136.
Q.
Zhang
,
M.
Xu
,
X.
Liu
,
W.
Zhao
,
C.
Zong
,
Y.
Yu
,
Q.
Wang
, and
H.
Gai
,
Chem. Commun.
52
(
28
),
5015
(
2016
).
137.
H.
Yuan
,
Q.
Ma
,
Y.
Song
,
M. Y. H.
Tang
,
Y. K.
Chan
, and
Ho C.
Shum
,
Macromol. Chem. Phys.
218
(
2
),
1600422
(
2017
).
138.
A.
Pfau
,
R.
Sander
, and
S.
Kirsch
,
Langmuir
18
(
7
),
2880
(
2002
).
139.
Y.
Li
,
S.
Chen
,
S.
Demirci
,
S.
Qin
,
Z.
Xu
,
E.
Olson
,
F.
Liu
,
D.
Palm
,
X.
Yong
, and
S.
Jiang
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
543
,
34
(
2019
).
140.
C.
Kaewsaneha
,
A.
Bitar
,
P.
Tangboriboonrat
,
D.
Polpanich
, and
A.
Elaissari
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
424
,
98
(
2014
).
141.
S.
Khoee
and
M.
Soleymani
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
494
,
805
(
2019
).
142.
X.
Yu
,
Y.
Sun
,
F.
Liang
,
B.
Jiang
, and
Z.
Yang
,
Macromolecules
52
(
1
),
96
(
2019
).
143.
S.
Rossnagel
, in
Handbook of Thin Film Deposition Processes and Techniques
, 2nd ed., edited by
S.
Krishna
(
Noyes Publications; William Andrew publishing
,
New York
,
2001
), p.
319
.
144.
L. Y.
Wu
,
B. M.
Ross
,
S. G.
Hong
, and
L. P.
Lee
,
Small
6
(
4
),
503
(
2010
).
145.
P.
Pedrosa
,
A.
Ferreira
,
N.
Martin
,
M.
Arab Pour Yazdi
,
A.
Billard
,
S.
Lanceros-Méndez
, and
F.
Vaz
,
Nanotechnology
29
(
35
),
355706
(
2018
).
146.
S.
Meng
,
Y.
Zhang
,
Y.
Liu
,
Z.
Zhang
,
K.
Ma
,
X.
Chen
,
Q.
Gao
,
X.
Ma
,
W.
Wang
, and
H.
Feng
,
JCIS Open
5
,
100046
(
2022
).
147.
D.
Suzuki
and
H.
Kawaguchi
,
Colloid Polym. Sci.
284
(
12
),
1471
(
2006
).
148.
T.
Maric
,
M. Z. M.
Nasir
,
R. D.
Webster
, and
M.
Pumera
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
30
(
9
),
1908614
(
2020
).
149.
Q.
Liu
,
S.
Meng
,
T.
Zheng
,
Y.
Liu
,
X.
Ma
, and
H.
Feng
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
13
(
30
),
35897
(
2021
).
150.
K. H.
Ku
,
Y. J.
Lee
,
G.-R.
Yi
,
S. G.
Jang
,
B. V. K. J.
Schmidt
,
K.
Liao
,
D.
Klinger
,
C. J.
Hawker
, and
B. J.
Kim
,
Macromolecules
50
(
23
),
9276
(
2017
).
151.
Z.-H.
Xue
,
H.
Su
,
Q.-Y.
Yu
,
B.
Zhang
,
H.-H.
Wang
,
X.-H.
Li
, and
J.-S.
Chen
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
7
(
12
),
1602355
(
2017
).
152.
B. H. R.
Suryanto
,
Y.
Wang
,
R. K.
Hocking
,
W.
Adamson
, and
C.
Zhao
,
Nat. Commun.
10
(
1
),
5599
(
2019
).
153.
B.
Liu
,
B.
Cao
,
Y.
Cheng
,
P.
Jing
,
J.
Zhao
,
R.
Gao
,
A.
O’Mullane
,
H.
Zhu
,
K.
Liu
,
X.
Sun
,
Y.
Du
, and
J.
Zhang
,
iScience
23
(
7
),
101264
(
2020
).
154.
J.
Zhu
,
L.
Xu
,
Z.
Lyu
,
M.
Xie
,
R.
Chen
,
W.
Jin
,
M.
Mavrikakis
, and
Y.
Xia
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
60
(
18
),
10384
(
2021
).
155.
R.
Wu
,
B.
Xiao
,
Q.
Gao
,
Y.-R.
Zheng
,
X.-S.
Zheng
,
J.-F.
Zhu
,
M.-R.
Gao
, and
S.-H.
Yu
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
57
(
47
),
15445
(
2018
).
156.
L.-A.
Stern
,
L.
Feng
,
F.
Song
, and
X.
Hu
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
8
(
8
),
2347
(
2015
).
157.
B.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
Q.
Wu
,
Y.
Lu
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Wang
,
B.
Yu
,
D. X.
Yang
, and
W.
Zhang
,
J. Mater. Sci. Technol.
74
,
11
(
2021
).
158.
A. M.
Pourrahimi
,
K.
Villa
,
C. L. M.
Palenzuela
,
Y.
Ying
,
Z.
Sofer
, and
M.
Pumera
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
29
(
22
),
1808678
(
2019
);
Q.
Zhang
,
R.
Dong
,
Y.
Wu
,
W.
Gao
,
Z.
He
, and
B.
Ren
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
5
),
4674
(
2017
).
[PubMed]
159.
J.
Lai
,
B.
Huang
,
Y.
Tang
,
F.
Lin
,
P.
Zhou
,
X.
Chen
,
Y.
Sun
,
F.
Lv
, and
S.
Guo
,
Chem
4
(
5
),
1153
(
2018
).
160.
T.
Tanaka
,
R.
Nakatsuru
,
Y.
Kagari
,
N.
Saito
, and
M.
Okubo
,
Langmuir
24
(
21
),
12267
(
2008
).
161.
J.-B.
Fan
,
H.
Liu
,
Y.
Song
,
Z.
Luo
,
Z.
Lu
, and
S.
Wang
,
Macromolecules
51
(
5
),
1591
(
2018
).
162.
S.
Lone
,
S. H.
Kim
,
S. W.
Nam
,
S.
Park
,
J.
Joo
, and
I. W.
Cheong
,
Chem. Commun.
47
(
9
),
2634
(
2011
).
163.
J.
Liu
,
H.
Chen
,
X.
Shi
,
S.
Nawar
,
J. . G.
Werner
,
G.
Huang
,
M.
Ye
,
D. A.
Weitz
,
A. A.
Solovev
, and
Y.
Mei
,
Environ. Sci.: Nano
7
(
2
),
656
(
2020
).
164.
E.
Dehghani
,
M.
Salami-Kalajahi
, and
H.
Roghani-Mamaqani
,
Colloids Surf., B
173
,
155
(
2019
).
165.
J.
Reguera
,
D.
Jiménez de Aberasturi
,
N.
Winckelmans
,
J.
Langer
,
S.
Bals
, and
L. M.
Liz-Marzán
,
Faraday Discuss.
191
,
47
(
2016
).
166.
D.
Li
,
Y.
Luo
,
J.
Lan
,
Z.
Luo
,
F.
Li
, and
K.
Luo
,
Gold Bull.
53
(
2
),
55
(
2020
).
167.
K. D.
Anderson
,
M.
Luo
,
R.
Jakubiak
,
R. R.
Naik
,
T. J.
Bunning
, and
V. V.
Tsukruk
,
Chem. Mater.
22
(
10
),
3259
(
2010
).
168.
Q.
Zhang
,
B.
Liu
,
Y.
Ji
,
L.
Chen
,
L.
Zhang
,
L.
Li
, and
C.
Wang
,
Nanoscale
12
(
4
),
2578
(
2020
).
169.
Y.
Yan
,
B. Y.
Xia
,
X.
Ge
,
Z.
Liu
,
A.
Fisher
, and
X.
Wang
,
Chem. - Eur. J.
21
(
50
),
18062
(
2015
).
170.
Y.
Fu
,
Y.
Shan
,
G.
Zhou
,
L.
Long
,
L.
Wang
,
K. B.
Yin
,
J.
Guo
,
J.
Shen
,
L.
Liu
, and
X.
Wu
,
Joule
3
(
12
),
2955
(
2019
).
171.
J.
Zhu
,
E.
Jiang
,
X.
Wang
,
Z.
Pan
,
X.
Xu
,
S.
Ma
,
P.
Kang Shen
,
L.
Pan
,
M.
Eguchi
,
A. K.
Nanjundan
,
J.
Shapter
, and
Y.
Yamauchi
,
Chem. Eng. J.
427
,
130946
(
2022
).
172.
H. Y.
He
,
Z.
He
, and
Q.
Shen
,
Colloid Interface Sci. Commun.
45
,
100509
(
2021
).
173.
A.
Han
,
H.
Zhang
,
R.
Yuan
,
H.
Ji
, and
P.
Du
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
3
),
2240
(
2017
).
174.
F.
Ma
,
S.
Wang
,
X.
Gong
,
X.
Liu
,
Z.
Wang
,
P.
Wang
,
Y.
Liu
,
H.
Cheng
,
Y.
Dai
,
Z.
Zheng
, and
B.
Huang
,
Appl. Catal., B
307
,
121198
(
2022
).
175.
Y.
Wei
,
W.
Li
,
D.
Li
,
L.
Yi
, and
W.
Hu
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
47
(
12
),
7783
(
2022
).
176.
W.
Li
,
X.
Gao
,
X.
Wang
,
D.
Xiong
,
P.-P.
Huang
,
W.-G.
Song
,
X.
Bao
, and
L.
Liu
,
J. Power Sources
330
,
156
(
2016
).
177.
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Yang
,
B.
Chen
,
X.
Li
,
M.
Guo
,
Y.
Yang
,
K.
Xu
, and
C.
Yuan
,
Inorg. Chem.
60
(
23
),
18325
(
2021
).
178.
J.
Feng
,
X.
Wang
,
D.
Zhang
,
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
M.
Pi
,
H.
Zhou
,
J.
Li
, and
S.
Chen
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
165
(
16
),
F1323
(
2018
).
179.
Q.
Yan
,
T.
Wei
,
J.
Wu
,
X.
Yang
,
M.
Zhu
,
K.
Cheng
,
K.
Ye
,
K.
Zhu
,
J.
Yan
,
D.
Cao
,
G.
Wang
, and
Y.
Pan
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
6
(
8
),
9640
(
2018
).
180.
Y.
Li
,
X.
Fu
,
W.
Zhu
,
J.
Gong
,
J.
Sun
,
D.
Zhang
, and
J.
Wang
,
Inorg. Chem. Front.
6
(
8
),
2090
(
2019
).
181.
J.
Park
,
H.
Jin
,
J.
Lee
,
A.
Oh
,
B.
Kim
,
J. H.
Kim
,
H.
Baik
,
S. H.
Joo
, and
K.
Lee
,
Chem. Mater.
30
(
19
),
6884
(
2018
).
182.
Z.
Xing
,
L.
Gan
,
J.
Wang
, and
X.
Yang
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
5
(
17
),
7744
(
2017
).
183.
G.
Liu
,
K.
Wang
,
L.
Wang
,
B.
Wang
,
Z.
Lin
,
X.
Chen
,
Y.
Hua
,
W.
Zhu
,
H.
Li
, and
J.
Xia
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
583
,
614
(
2021
).
184.
Z.
Ma
,
H.
Meng
,
M.
Wang
,
B.
Tang
,
J.
Li
, and
X.
Wang
,
ChemElectroChem
5
(
2
),
335
(
2018
).
185.
W.
Hong
,
C.
Lv
,
S.
Sun
, and
G.
Chen
,
Catal. Sci. Technol.
10
(
4
),
1023
(
2020
).
186.
Y.
Rong
,
Y.
Ma
,
F.
Guo
,
J.
Qian
,
H.
Li
,
M.
Zhou
,
Z.
Xu
,
Y.-Q.
Zheng
, and
T.-T.
Li
,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
44
(
54
),
28833
(
2019
).
187.
S.
Zhang
,
G.
Gao
,
H.
Zhu
,
L.
Cai
,
X.
Jiang
,
S.
Lu
,
F.
Duan
,
W.
Dong
,
Y.
Chai
, and
M.
Du
,
Sci. Bull.
65
(
8
),
640
(
2020
).
188.
C.
He
,
X.
Wu
, and
Z.
He
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
118
(
9
),
4578
(
2014
).
189.
Q.
Liu
,
S.
Gu
, and
C. M.
Li
,
J. Power Sources
299
,
342
(
2015
).
190.
S.
Cobo
,
J.
Heidkamp
,
P.-A.
Jacques
,
J.
Fize
,
V.
Fourmond
,
L.
Guetaz
,
B.
Jousselme
,
V.
Ivanova
,
H.
Dau
,
S.
Palacin
,
M.
Fontecave
, and
V.
Artero
,
Nat. Mater.
11
(
9
),
802
(
2012
).
191.
Y.
Li
,
H.
Xu
,
P.
Yang
,
R.
Li
,
D.
Wang
,
P.
Ren
,
S.
Ji
,
X.
Lu
,
F.
Meng
,
J.
Zhang
, and
M.
An
,
Mater. Today Energy
25
,
100975
(
2022
).
192.
L.
Feng
,
X.
Zhang
,
J.
Huang
,
D.
He
,
X.
Li
,
Q.
Liu
,
Y.
Feng
,
G.
Li
,
G.
Xu
, and
L.
Cao
,
Nanoscale
13
(
42
),
17920
(
2021
).
193.
Z.
Chen
,
X.
Duan
,
W.
Wei
,
S.
Wang
, and
B.-J.
Ni
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
7
(
25
),
14971
(
2019
).
194.
A.
Devadoss
,
N.
Srinivasan
,
V. P.
Devarajan
,
A.
Nirmala Grace
, and
S.
Pitchaimuthu
, in
2D Nanoscale Heterostructured Materials
, edited by
S.
Jit
and
S.
Das
(
Elsevier
,
2020
), p.
215
.
195.
S.
Wang
,
A.
Lu
, and
C.-J.
Zhong
,
Nano Convergence
8
(
1
),
4
(
2021
).
196.
197.
M.
Li
,
K.
Duanmu
,
C.
Wan
,
T.
Cheng
,
L.
Zhang
,
S.
Dai
,
W.
Chen
,
Z.
Zhao
,
P.
Li
,
H.
Fei
,
Y.
Zhu
,
R.
Yu
,
J.
Luo
,
K.
Zang
,
Z.
Lin
,
M.
Ding
,
J.
Huang
,
H.
Sun
,
J.
Guo
,
X.
Pan
,
W. A.
Goddard
,
P.
Sautet
,
Y.
Huang
, and
X.
Duan
,
Nat. Catal.
2
(
6
),
495
(
2019
).
198.
J.
Cai
,
R.
Javed
,
D.
Ye
,
H.
Zhao
, and
J.
Zhang
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
8
(
43
),
22467
(
2020
).
199.
K. C.
Majhi
and
M.
Yadav
,
ACS Eng. Au
3
(
5
),
278
(
2023
).
200.
K.
Bhunia
,
M.
Chandra
,
S.
Kumar Sharma
,
D.
Pradhan
, and
S.-J.
Kim
,
Coord. Chem. Rev.
478
,
214956
(
2023
).
201.
Z.
Peng
,
D.
Jia
,
A. M.
Al-Enizi
,
A. A.
Elzatahry
, and
G.
Zheng
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
5
(
9
),
1402031
(
2015
).
202.
B.
Zhu
,
R.
Zou
, and
Q.
Xu
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
8
(
24
),
1801193
(
2018
).
203.
Z. W.
Seh
,
S.
Liu
,
S.-Y.
Zhang
,
M. S.
Bharathi
,
H.
Ramanarayan
,
M.
Low
,
K. W.
Shah
,
Y.-W.
Zhang
, and
M.-Y.
Han
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
50
(
43
),
10140
(
2011
).
204.
S.
Crossley
,
J.
Faria
,
M.
Shen
, and
D. E.
Resasco
,
Science
327
(
5961
),
68
(
2010
).
205.
V.
Montes-García
and
P.
Samorì
,
Chem. Sci.
13
(
2
),
315
(
2022
).
206.
K.
Piradashvili
,
E. M.
Alexandrino
,
F. R.
Wurm
, and
K.
Landfester
,
Chem. Rev.
116
(
4
),
2141
(
2016
);
[PubMed]
Y.
Liu
,
J.
Hu
,
X.
Yu
,
X.
Xu
,
Y.
Gao
,
H.
Li
, and
F.
Liang
,
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
490
,
357
(
2017
).
[PubMed]
207.
D.
Vikraman
,
S.
Hussain
,
I.
Rabani
,
A.
Feroze
,
M.
Ali
,
Y.-S.
Seo
,
S.-H.
Chun
,
J.
Jung
, and
H.-S.
Kim
,
Nano Energy
87
,
106161
(
2021
).
208.
P.
Chen
,
Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process.
138
,
106253
(
2022
).