With the increasing development of photothermal techniques in various fields, particularly concentrated solar power (CSP) systems and solar thermoelectric generators (STEGs), the demand for high-performance spectrally selective absorbers (SSAs) has grown significantly. These SSAs are essential in achieving high solar absorption and minimal infrared thermal loss, thereby significantly enhancing solar utilization efficiency. This need becomes particularly critical in CSP systems, where high temperatures are pivotal for improved efficiency. However, the necessity for high temperatures imposes stringent requirements on the fabrication of SSAs, given the inherent trade-off between optical performance and thermal stability. SSAs typically require nanoscale thin films, but they are prone to oxidation and diffusion at high temperatures. Recent developments in photothermal materials, including ceramic composites, MXenes, high-entropy materials, and graphene, offer promising solutions to enhance SSAs’ performance. This review article provides a comprehensive evaluation of the latest advancements in these emerging photothermal materials. We summarize the strategies for integrating these advanced materials with already established nanostructures, which is a highly promising approach for the development of advanced SSAs. Additionally, the review explores the application of SSAs in CSP systems and STEGs to boost power generation efficiency. We conclude by summarizing the challenges and opportunities in the field of high-temperature SSAs, offering valuable insights into the development of high-performance SSAs and their role in solar-thermal power generation systems.

The vast potential of solar energy has established it as a key player in addressing the global energy shortage.1 Currently, solar energy utilization spans photovoltaic power generation,2 solar-thermal conversion,3 photocatalysis,4 and photobiological applications.5 Among these, solar-thermal conversion, which transforms solar light into thermal energy, is particularly noteworthy for its directness and efficiency. This process involves absorbing solar photons and converting them into heat, which can then be used to generate electricity or chemical energy.6 To optimize solar energy utilization efficiency, spectrally selective absorbers (SSAs) are crucial. These SSAs are designed to maximize solar energy absorption while minimizing thermal loss through infrared (IR) radiation.7–9 Current solar thermal technologies encompass a range, from concentrated solar power (CSP) systems10 and solar thermoelectric generators (STEGs)11 to applications in water evaporation,12 solar thermal sterilization,13 and personal thermal management.14 CSP systems and STEGs, leveraging solar-thermal techniques, are pivotal in power generation.15,16 According to Carnot efficiency, creating high-temperature surfaces significantly enhances power generation efficiency.17 Notably, next-generation CSP systems are anticipated to operate at temperatures exceeding 700 °C, heightening the demand for SSAs as radiative heat loss escalates exponentially with temperature, as per the Stefan–Boltzmann law.18–20 However, these high-temperature conditions present significant challenges for SSAs, which must possess both excellent optical properties and thermal stability.

Since the concept of SSA was introduced in the 1950s by Tabor,21 extensive research has focused on developing advanced SSAs through nanostructure design and material selection.22–24 To date, various nanostructures have been effectively established in SSA development, including intrinsic absorbers,25,26 optical microcavity multilayer structures,10,27 dual-ceramic structures,10,22 simple double-layer structures,28,29 and plasmonic absorbers.30,31 Concurrently, there has been significant progress in advanced materials such as ceramic composites,32,33 two-dimensional (2D) MXenes,34,35 high-entropy materials,36,37 and graphene.38,39 These materials have demonstrated remarkable light-trapping abilities, offering new opportunities for SSAs’ development. Notably, the integration of these emerging materials with established nanostructures holds great promise for developing high-performance SSAs. For instance, 2D MXenes, used as intrinsic SSAs, exhibit superior spectral selectivity compared to traditional materials.25 Similarly, incorporating high-entropy materials into dual-ceramic structures enhances both spectral selectivity and thermal stability, outperforming commercial SSAs.40 Moreover, combining ceramic composites with microcavity multilayer or simple double-layer structures has increased the thermal stability of SSAs to above 800 °C.41,42 These advancements in SSAs are revolutionizing traditional performance standards, potentially resolving the trade-off between optical properties and thermal stability.

This review concentrates on these advanced materials currently being explored for the fabrication of SSA. It begins by highlighting critical aspects of SSAs, such as solar absorptivity, thermal emissivity, photothermal conversion efficiency, and lifetime evaluation. It then covers prevalent fabrication techniques, including magnetron sputtering and the sol–gel method. Subsequently, the review introduces promising materials suitable for SSA preparation and emphasizes recent advancements in various nanostructures, along with the performance enhancements achieved with the synergy of these advanced photothermal materials with nanostructures. Finally, we review their applications in photothermal power generation, including CSP systems and STEGs. This review aims to provide insights for future research that synergizes emerging materials with established nanostructures for next-generation SSAs, thus paving the way for more efficient solar energy utilization.

In 1865, Maxwell introduced classical electromagnetic field dynamics, defining sunlight as electromagnetic radiation.43 According to Maxwell’s equations, under the assumption of a uniform medium without free charges, the electric vector Δ2E of solar rays can be calculated as follows:
(1)
where μdiel, εdiel, and δdiel represent the dielectric permeability, dielectric constant, and dielectric conductivity, respectively. To simplify this into a one-dimensional equation set, we have
(2)
where E is the electric field strength, kexti is the extinction coefficient, nr is the refractive index, and λ is the radiation wavelength. Both the refractive index and the extinction coefficient are crucial optical constants in the design of optical coatings. They can simplify experimental processes and enhance the theoretical understanding of SSAs. For example, Biswas et al. measured the ellipsometric spectra of TiAlN, TiAlON, and Si3N4 films.44 Utilizing the Drude model for TiAlN and the Tauc–Lorentz model for SiAlON and Si3N4, they calculated the refractive index and extinction coefficient values across the wavelength range of 300–1200 nm. This theoretical approach provides essential guidance for the design of multilayer absorbers. Moreover, Barshilia et al. optimized a TiAlN/TiAlON/Si3N4 tandem SSA by designing gradient increased optical constants from the surface to the Cu substrate, achieving spectral reflectance reduction layer by layer.45 
When light interacts with the surface of an object, several phenomena occur: reflection, transmission, and absorption.27 Based on the law of conservation of energy and assuming the total incident light energy is unity, the sum of the transmission, absorption, and reflection must equal this total incident energy. Hence, the total radiation can be expressed as follows:
(3)
where Aλ, Rλ, and Tλ are the energies absorbed, reflected, and transmitted by the material at wavelength λ. For opaque materials, where Tλ = 0, Eq. (3) simplifies to
(4)
Therefore, by measuring the reflectivity of an object, its absorption can be determined. The absorptance is defined as the ratio of the absorbed radiation to the total incident radiation at a given wavelength,
(5)
where Gλ,α(λ) and Gλ(λ) represent the absorbed and total incident radiation at wavelength λ, respectively. Considering that solar energy is mainly distributed in the UV–Vis–NIR range (0.3–2.5 µm), the solar absorptivity can be calculated using the equation
(6)
where λ is the wavelength, θ is the angle of incidence, and Gλ(λ) is the solar radiation intensity at wavelength λ under atmospheric mass 1.5 (AM1.5).
Thermal emissivity is a fundamental concept rooted in blackbody theory, which asserts that all objects emit electromagnetic radiation.10,46 The energy distribution of this radiation for a perfect blackbody is defined by Planck’s law
(7)
Here, E,per(λ, T) is the radiation energy distribution of a perfect blackbody at a specific wavelength λ and temperature T, c is the speed of light, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and h is the Planck constant. According to the Stefan–Boltzmann law, the total emissive power of a blackbody is directly proportional to the fourth power of its temperature,15 
(8)
where σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant. Wien’s displacement law further indicates that the peak of blackbody radiation shifts with temperature; specifically, as temperature increases, the peak radiation intensifies and the corresponding wavelength decreases. This phenomenon is depicted in Fig. 1, which shows the blackbody radiation energy at different temperatures.
FIG. 1.

Illustrations of the AM 1.5 solar spectrum, blackbody radiation at temperatures of 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C, and the ideal reflectance spectrum of SSA at a working temperature of 500 °C.

FIG. 1.

Illustrations of the AM 1.5 solar spectrum, blackbody radiation at temperatures of 200, 300, 400, and 500 °C, and the ideal reflectance spectrum of SSA at a working temperature of 500 °C.

Close modal
The emissivity of a material can be represented as the ratio of the radiation Eλ emitted by the body at a given temperature to the radiation E emitted by a perfect blackbody at the same temperature. According to Kirchhoff’s law, at a constant temperature T, the total hemispherical emissivity ελ(λ) of an object’s surface is equal to its total hemispherical absorptivity αλ(λ) at the same temperature, i.e., ελ(λ) = αλ(λ). Therefore, by combining Eqs. (3) and (4), the emissivity at temperature T can be calculated as
(9)
For an ideal SSA, the reflectance curve would ideally exhibit a step shape, as shown in Fig. 1. A critical feature of this curve is the cutoff wavelength, defined at the point where absorptivity/emissivity start to decrease, marking the intersection of the solar radiation curve with the blackbody radiation curve.47 Before the cutoff wavelength, the reflectance equals 0; beyond this wavelength, the reflectance becomes 1. Researchers refer to the ratio of solar absorptivity to thermal emissivity as spectral selectivity (α/ε).
In solar-thermal applications, the photothermal conversion efficiency is a critical parameter for evaluating the performance of SSA and is essential for optimizing the design of the absorber.10,48,49 The formula for calculating the photothermal conversion efficiency is given by
(10)
Here, σ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, T is the working temperature, C is the concentration factor, and I is the solar flux intensity. The term B denotes the transmittance of the glass envelope,50 typically a constant of 0.91.
In practical CSP systems, the efficiency of the heat engine must also be taken into account, as the ultimate goal is to maximize the conversion of solar energy into electrical energy.8 Therefore, the overall efficiency of the solar-thermal system is a critical measure for quantifying the conversion of solar energy into electrical energy. The overall efficiency can be expressed as
(11)
where ηtotal is the total conversion efficiency, TA is the ambient temperature, and TH is the working temperature of the system. The term 1TATH represents the Carnot efficiency. This equation highlights that enhancing the operating temperature can effectively improve the overall conversion efficiency of the system.
The performance criterion (PC) is an essential measure for assessing the thermal stability of SSAs.51 This criterion is particularly valuable as it provides insight into the longevity and efficiency of SSAs under operational conditions. The PC is calculated using the following formula:
(12)
Here, Δα and Δε represent the change in absorptivity and emissivity, respectively, before and after the SSA undergoes thermal treatment. A PC value of 0.05 is indicative of a relative decrease of 5% in the annual solar fraction for a typical domestic hot water system. This quantification is crucial to understanding the impact of material degradation over time. Furthermore, the time duration required for the SSA to reach this PC value is referred to as the failure time. This metric is particularly useful for predicting the lifespan of SSAs, especially when combined with accelerated thermal aging tests.52 Such tests simulate the long-term effects of thermal exposure on the SSAs in a condensed time frame, providing valuable data on their durability and performance degradation. During the thermal stability tests for SSAs, surpassing a PC value of 0.05 serves as an indicator of failure. This threshold suggests that the absorber has deteriorated to a point where it can no longer fulfill the requirements of its intended working temperature and duration.

Electroplating, physical vapor deposition (PVD, e.g., magnetron sputtering), and sol–gel methods are widely used methods for preparing SSAs. Electroplating, one of the earliest coating fabrication methods for SSAs, is characterized by low current density, good dispersion, and high current efficiency.53 It is generally used for preparing black nickel and black chrome absorption coatings.54–56 However, these coatings have inferior optical properties and thermal stability only in the temperature range of 200–400 °C. Currently, magnetron sputtering and sol–gel methods are popular fabrication processes for solar selective absorption coatings.

Magnetron sputtering has become a commercial method for fabricating SSAs.57 It provides high film quality, good controllability, a uniform microstructure, and can achieve roll-to-roll production. This method involves ionizing working gases like Ar in a vacuum and bombarding the target material so that neutral target atoms or molecules are deposited on a substrate to form a coating, as shown in Fig. 2(a). In direct current (DC) sputtering, for instance, the cathode is a metal target, and the anode is usually a grounded rotating substrate. A negative bias voltage of several hundred to a thousand volts is applied to the cathode. The gas atoms or molecules are ionized, accelerating with high energy to strike the target surface.58 Part of the target material atoms are sputtered off the surface, while others produce secondary electrons, which then accelerate away from the cathode to form plasma. These secondary electrons maintain glow discharge, creating more high-energy particles that bombard the surface and cause material atoms to leave the target and fly toward the substrate.59 

FIG. 2.

The fabrication method of SSAs. Schematic diagrams of (a) magnetron sputtering and (b) sol–gel process.

FIG. 2.

The fabrication method of SSAs. Schematic diagrams of (a) magnetron sputtering and (b) sol–gel process.

Close modal

Magnetron sputtering is widely employed to prepare SSAs with excellent performance. Researchers used N2 and O2 as reactive gases and TiAl44,45 and NbAl44 as sputtering targets to prepare ceramic absorbers, achieving high absorptance (>0.95). When the AlTiO sputtered with O2 as reactive gases served as an anti-reflective layer, the coatings remained stable at 450 °C for 1000 h.60 Recently, Li et al. used magnetron sputtering to fabricate all-ceramic solar selective absorbers TiN/TiNO/ZrO2/SiO2, achieving dense and uniform coatings that raised the working temperature of traditional absorbers by at least 227 °C.61 Moreover, multi-target sputtering deposition has become a hot research topic, allowing for more flexibility to fabricate SSAs with excellent properties.62 For example, Wang and co-workers used Mo, Zr, and Si multi-target reactive sputtering to fabricate dual-ceramic SSA.63 They controlled the Ar/N2/O2 gas flow to deposit Mo, ZrSiN, ZrSiON, and SiO2 layers with adjustable metallic and dielectric properties, resulting in a dense coating that maintained stability at 600 °C in vacuum for 300 h.

The sol–gel method, a type of wet chemical process, gained popularity in the 1960s.64 It is pivotal in the field of material science, particularly for the fabrication of SSA. As shown in Fig. 2(b), this process begins with the dissolution of metal compounds (including metal alkoxides, ethanolates, and halides) in organic solvents or water. Subsequent hydrolysis or alcoholysis reactions convert these solutions into a liquid precursor. The addition of a film-forming agent then triggers further hydrolysis and condensation, resulting in the formation of a stable sol. This sol is then uniformly deposited on a substrate and subjected to thermal treatment. During this phase, solvent mobility between sol networks is reduced, leading to the formation of a gel-like structure.65 Sintering processes are then employed to solidify the coating, forming a durable and uniform layer. This process offers low fabrication temperatures, good coating uniformity, and mild chemical conditions. This method also allows for controlled hydrolysis and condensation reactions and is particularly adept at producing materials with high porosity.66 In contrast to other techniques like magnetron sputtering, the sol–gel method is notably cost-effective and simpler to execute.67 

Over 15 years ago, researchers used the sol–gel technique to fabricate SSAs,68 by embedding carbon nanoparticles in ZnO and NiO matrices on Al substrates. Using polyethylene glycol as a solution gelling agent, they mixed and dispersed oxides with carbon nanoparticles, spin-coated them onto Al substrates, and dried them at 550 °C in an N2 atmosphere to form a dense oxide matrix. The resulting C–NiO coating had a high solar absorptivity of 0.84 and a low emissivity of 0.04. Continuing advancements in this method have seen improvements in coating performance. For instance, researchers have applied thermally treated organically modified SiO2 colloids as anti-reflective layers on absorber surfaces, effectively raising their thermal stability to 500 °C.69 Grosso et al. employed the sol–gel process to create nanocrystalline RuO2/SiO2 composite material layers, exhibiting remarkable thermal stability over prolonged durations of 1000 h at 600 °C in air.70 However, these coatings have exhibited a relatively high thermal emissivity of ∼0.28 at 600 °C, leading to significant IR heat loss. To ensure coating stability while minimizing energy loss, Li et al. innovatively used the sol–gel technique to fabricate an all-ceramic structure with plasmonic properties.71 This involved spin-coating a TiN-containing sol onto an infrared-reflective metal layer and subsequently covering it with SiO2. After thermal curing, they obtained a coating with high absorption and low emission, achieving a high photothermal efficiency of 89%–93%.

With the development of material science and technology, a growing array of advanced materials is being developed, which shows significant promise for the preparation of high-performance SSAs. These include ultra-high temperature ceramic composites,72 2D MXenes,73 graphene,74 and high-entropy materials.75  Figure 3(a) illustrates the potential elements that these four materials incorporate in the preparation of SSAs. Notably, these materials offer extensive opportunities for the enhancement of optical properties and for improving thermal and chemical stability.

FIG. 3.

Constituent elements and crystal structures of emerging advanced materials for SSAs. (a) Possible constituent elements of four materials (ultra-high temperature ceramic composites, MXenes, high-entropy materials, and graphene) in the Periodic Table. (b) Schematic crystal structure of the MXene material Ti3C2Tx. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 33, 2005074 (2021). Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons. (c) Schematic crystal structure of high-entropy nitride with a face-centered cubic structure. Reproduced with permission from Wu et al., Surf. Coat. Technol. 476, 130157 (2024). Copyright 2024 Elsevier.76 (d) Schematic structure of 2D layered graphene. Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 19(1), 613–648 (2018). Copyright 2018 Taylor & Francis.

FIG. 3.

Constituent elements and crystal structures of emerging advanced materials for SSAs. (a) Possible constituent elements of four materials (ultra-high temperature ceramic composites, MXenes, high-entropy materials, and graphene) in the Periodic Table. (b) Schematic crystal structure of the MXene material Ti3C2Tx. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 33, 2005074 (2021). Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons. (c) Schematic crystal structure of high-entropy nitride with a face-centered cubic structure. Reproduced with permission from Wu et al., Surf. Coat. Technol. 476, 130157 (2024). Copyright 2024 Elsevier.76 (d) Schematic structure of 2D layered graphene. Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 19(1), 613–648 (2018). Copyright 2018 Taylor & Francis.

Close modal

Transition metal ultra-high temperature ceramic materials such as carbides, nitrides, and borides have been extensively used for the fabrication of SSAs, benefiting from their excellent thermal stability and unique d band structures.77–82 Notably, these ultra-high temperature ceramics, with their exceptional high-temperature resistance, mechanical strength, wear resistance, and chemical stability, have been widely applied as protective coatings on spacecraft surfaces.83,84 Early research on these materials-based SSAs mainly focused on single component transition metal ceramics. For example, studies on single coatings of NbB2, TiN, CrN, ZrB2, and TiC found good promise for the preparation of SSAs.81,85–88 However, most of these transition metal ceramic-based absorbers suffer from either low spectral selectivity or insufficient thermal robustness. Although building multilayer structures is able to improve the spectral selectivity of binary ceramic SSAs, they fall short in photothermal conversion applications above 600 °C, particularly for the next-generation CSP system. This is because these materials suffer from heat stress at high operating temperatures, which results in component oxidation and element diffusion responsible for the weakened optical properties.

To address this, researchers began exploring the combination of two different types of ceramics to create composite materials, thereby leveraging the synergistic effects to simultaneously boost optical properties and thermal stability. These ceramic composite materials have shown potential for meeting some harsh requirements, offering a new avenue for the design and optimization of high-performance SSAs. For instance, TiC–ZrC ceramic composite materials demonstrated high spectral selectivity (α/ε = 0.92/0.11) and maintained optical stability at 700 °C in a vacuum over 100 h.89 Additionally, doping ultra-high temperature ceramics with rare earth elements and transition metal oxides has proven effective in enhancing SSA performance. Examples include TiC–Y and ZrC–ZrO2 composite ceramics, which have shown notable thermal stability and optical properties.90,91

MXenes, a new class of 2D materials composed of transition metal carbides and carbonitrides, represent a significant breakthrough in material science.92–94 These materials are generally represented by the formula Mn+1XnTx, where M is a transition metal, “X” can be either carbon or nitrogen, T stands for surface functional groups, and x indicates the number of these groups, as shown in Fig. 3(b). Their diverse elemental composition and structural versatility endow MXenes with remarkable physical and chemical properties. Since their discovery in 2011, MXenes have found applications across a wide range of fields, including catalysis,95 battery,96 supercapacitors,97 environmental science,98 photonic diodes,99 and electromagnetic wave management.100 

Recent advancements have particularly highlighted the potential of MXenes in photothermal conversion applications. This is attributed to their adjustable bandgaps and electronic structures.101–103 Wang and co-workers have demonstrated that MXenes exhibit superior light absorption compared to carbon nanotubes (CNTs), especially in applications like solar water evaporation, where a Ti3C2 film achieved an 84% evaporation efficiency, comparable to the best photothermal evaporation systems.103 In another study, Lu et al. enhanced solar absorption by combining MXene with Co3O4 nanoparticles, achieving a high solar absorption of 94%.104 Additionally, Shi et al. have discovered that MXene ceramic nanosheets are highly effective in near-infrared (NIR) regions, making them viable for applications such as photothermal therapy in cancer treatment.105 The widespread adoption of MXenes in photothermal conversion highlights their potential in the development of high-performance SSAs.

High-entropy alloys, introduced in 2004 as a groundbreaking class of alloys, stand out from conventional alloys by their composition of at least five elements, each in nearly equal molar ratios.106–108 This unique composition leads to four core effects that imbue HEAs with exceptional thermodynamic, kinetic, performance, and structural advantages.109 A key characteristic of these alloys is their high configurational entropy, which lowers the Gibbs free energy, thereby promoting the formation of stable single-phase solid solutions. This leads to remarkable thermal stability and oxidation resistance. Building on the foundation of high-entropy alloys, the field has expanded to include high-entropy ceramics. These are created by integrating non-metal elements such as nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, and boron into the alloy matrix, resulting in a diverse array of high-entropy materials like nitrides,110 carbides,111 oxides,112–114 and borides.115 These materials demonstrate superior physical and mechanical properties.116 Crucially, the unique combination of transition metal elements with distinctive d-band structures and the specific atomic arrangements in high-entropy materials enhance their light absorption capabilities.117 

High-entropy materials offer improved thermal stability over traditional ceramic materials, attributed to the entropy-assisted stabilization effect.118 The present research focuses on designing multilayer structures and surface morphologies to augment solar absorption.119,120 Additionally, fine-tuning the composition of high-entropy materials has proven effective in enhancing light trapping capabilities and thermal stability. Initially, high-entropy nitrides and oxynitrides were utilized in the fabrication of SSAs using the magnetron sputtering method, showing distinct advantages over traditional SSAs.121,122 The structural properties of high-entropy nitrides, which typically present amorphous or fcc structures [Fig. 3(c)], vary depending on their elemental composition.116 More recently, high-entropy alloys,123 oxides,124 and borides125 have started to be explored for SSA preparation, revealing inherent spectral selectivity superior to binary counterparts. These advancements indicate the potential of high-entropy materials in advancing SSAs and their promising prospects in photothermal applications.

Graphene, a prominent member of the carbon-based material family, is renowned for its two-dimensional layered structure. Each layer is composed of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal, honeycomb-like lattice, as depicted in Fig. 3(d).126 This lattice structure is crucial for its ability to convert light into heat through lattice vibrations. One of the most notable features of graphene is its capability for broad-wavelength absorption, thanks to its abundant conjugated π-bonds. This characteristic allows graphene to absorb sunlight across almost the entire spectrum, categorizing it as a promising absorbing material.127,128 However, the inherent refractive index of graphene poses a limitation as it causes partial light reflection, thereby limiting absorption. To overcome this, various strategies, such as employing micro and nanostructures, have been developed to enhance light capture and minimize reflection.129 

One effective approach to augment the light absorption of graphene is the construction of textured surface structures. Additionally, leveraging the thickness-dependent bandgap of graphene allows for spectrally selective absorption by manipulating the thickness of graphene. For example, Jia and co-workers fabricated ultrathin graphene on a metallic trench-like structure, achieving excellent spectral selectivity, omnidirectional absorption, and high thermal stability, resulting in a high photothermal conversion efficiency of 90.1%.130 Additionally, researchers have found that reduced graphene oxide (rGO) films, which are simply fabricated from graphene, achieve high spectral selectivity and high-temperature tolerance. Qu and co-workers used a low-cost sol–gel method to prepare rGO films.125 By controlling the thickness of graphene flakes and the reduction level, they attained adjustable destructive interference with sunlight, achieving a high absorptance of 0.92 and a low thermal emissivity of 0.04 at 100 °C. The absorber also exhibited long-term high-temperature tolerance at 800 °C.

Intrinsic SSAs pertain to the natural spectral selectivity of a material, which is independent of any structural modifications. Commonly, semiconductor materials exhibit inherent spectral selectivity, but their capability to absorb solar energy is typically limited.131 The inherent bandgap in these materials allows for the absorption of photons with energy exceeding the bandgap width, leading to the transition of valence electrons to the conduction band (CB) and forming excited state electrons. The bandgap, which is the energy gap between the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB), necessitates that the energy of the absorbed photons (0) must be equal to or surpass the bandgap (Eg),
(13)
where h is Planck’s constant, υ0 is the frequency of light, and Eg represents the bandgap. Eg can be calculated as below:
(14)
Here, λc is the cutoff wavelength. When the wavelength of light is less than the cutoff wavelength, semiconductor materials absorb photon energy, transitioning electrons from the valence band to the conduction band and converting light energy into thermal energy, as shown in Fig. 4(a). Conversely, when the wavelength is greater than the cutoff wavelength, the energy of the photons is insufficient to enable electron transition across the bandgap, resulting in light being reflected or transmitted.
FIG. 4.

Fundamentals and advances in intrinsic SSAs. (a) The diagram of the light trapping mechanism for intrinsic SSAs. (b) Absorption/emission spectrum of Ti3C2Tx MXene intrinsic SSAs in the wavelength range of 0.3–17 µm. (c) Temperature variation over time under one sun illumination for Ti3C2Tx, black paint, and TiN-based SSAs. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 33, 2103054 (2021). Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons. (d) Absorption/emission spectrum of CoSb3 in the wavelength range of 0.3–20 µm. (e) Photothermal behavior of wet CoSb3 films with varying contents under one sun illumination. Reproduced with permission from Taranova et al., Nat. Commun. 14(1), 7280 (2023). Copyright 2023 John Springer Nature.

FIG. 4.

Fundamentals and advances in intrinsic SSAs. (a) The diagram of the light trapping mechanism for intrinsic SSAs. (b) Absorption/emission spectrum of Ti3C2Tx MXene intrinsic SSAs in the wavelength range of 0.3–17 µm. (c) Temperature variation over time under one sun illumination for Ti3C2Tx, black paint, and TiN-based SSAs. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 33, 2103054 (2021). Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons. (d) Absorption/emission spectrum of CoSb3 in the wavelength range of 0.3–20 µm. (e) Photothermal behavior of wet CoSb3 films with varying contents under one sun illumination. Reproduced with permission from Taranova et al., Nat. Commun. 14(1), 7280 (2023). Copyright 2023 John Springer Nature.

Close modal

A significant advantage of intrinsic SSAs is their spectral selectivity, which remains consistent regardless of the metallic substrate used. MXenes materials, as mentioned earlier, show promise in the preparation of intrinsic SSAs. For example, Huang and co-workers reported a black 2D structured Ti3C2Tx MXenes material, showing good intrinsic spectral selectivity.25 This absorber, prepared using a simple, scalable vacuum filtration technique, exhibited up to 90% solar absorptivity in the solar spectrum and as low as 10% infrared emissivity in the IR spectrum, as shown in Fig. 4(b). The surface temperature of this absorber under one sun illumination reached 89 °C, surpassing black paint and TiN nanoparticle coatings, as depicted in Fig. 4(c). Recently, Vomiero and co-workers developed a CoSbx (2 < x < 3) semiconductor absorber with intrinsic spectral selectivity.26 Due to its low bandgap, this absorber demonstrated a high absorptivity of 0.98 across the entire solar spectrum and a low emissivity of 0.18 in the IR region [Fig. 4(d)]. Under one sun illumination, the absorber surface reached 101.7 °C, as shown in Fig. 4(e), marking the highest recorded temperature for an intrinsic SSA in such conditions.

Intrinsic SSAs feature simple structures and ease of preparation, making them widely applicable, especially on flexible substrates.34 However, they also have limitations. First, their spectral selectivity heavily relies on the inherent properties of the materials, and a shortage of suitable materials hinders the development of intrinsic SSAs. Second, the solar absorptance of most of these materials rarely exceeds 0.90, significantly limiting absorber performance. Finally, their high-temperature stability is often poor. Intrinsic absorbing coatings exposed to air can easily degrade due to elemental diffusion in mid-to-high temperature environments.

Multilayer structured SSAs are typically characterized by optical microcavity structures composed of a dielectric–metal–dielectric (DMD) configuration. The alternating layers of dielectrics and metals in the optical microcavity structures can effectively absorb solar energy. Incident light, upon striking the dielectric layer and undergoing refraction, partially transmits to the metal layer for absorption. The residual light undergoes further refraction and is either absorbed or reflected by subsequent layers, efficiently harnessing solar energy, as illustrated in Fig. 5(a). This structure, therefore, enhances the light absorption ability while maintaining low emissivity due to the inclusion of a metal infrared reflective layer.

FIG. 5.

Fundamentals and advances in multilayer structured SSAs. (a) Schematic representation of the microcavity structure in multilayer structured SSAs. (b) The thicknesses of each layer in ceramic TiB2-based multilayer structured SSAs. (c) The corresponding reflectance spectra of the SSAs after long-term heat treatment at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission from Ren et al., Mater. Today Phys. 34, 101092 (2023). Copyright 2023 Elsevier. (d) Schematic diagram of the QOM structure. (e) The corresponding reflectance spectra after 200 h of vacuum annealing at 700 and 800 °C. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., Appl. Mater. 13(34), 40522–40530 (2021). Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 5.

Fundamentals and advances in multilayer structured SSAs. (a) Schematic representation of the microcavity structure in multilayer structured SSAs. (b) The thicknesses of each layer in ceramic TiB2-based multilayer structured SSAs. (c) The corresponding reflectance spectra of the SSAs after long-term heat treatment at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission from Ren et al., Mater. Today Phys. 34, 101092 (2023). Copyright 2023 Elsevier. (d) Schematic diagram of the QOM structure. (e) The corresponding reflectance spectra after 200 h of vacuum annealing at 700 and 800 °C. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., Appl. Mater. 13(34), 40522–40530 (2021). Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Traditional optical microcavity structures like Al2O3/Pt/Al2O3,132 MgO/Zr/MgO,133 CrxOy/Cr/Cr2O3,134 and ZrOx/Zr/ZrOx/AlxOy135 have demonstrated good optical performance. However, the thin metal layers in these conventional DMD structures often lead to poor high-temperature thermal stability, primarily due to interlayer diffusion at elevated temperatures. To improve thermal stability, some studies have explored the use of ultra-high temperature ceramic materials as substitutes for the metal layer. For instance, Wang and colleagues recently introduced a novel DMD structured SSA that replaces the traditional metal layer with TiB2, as shown in Fig. 5(b). This structure achieved high spectral selectivity (α/ε = 0.934/0.069) at 300 °C.136 When depositing on a stainless steel substrate, these SSAs exhibited remarkable thermal stability at 800 °C, with little change in optical performance over 200 h [Fig. 5(c)], proving the effectiveness of incorporating ultra-high temperature ceramics into DMD structures.

Furthermore, researchers have been experimenting with combining ceramic composite materials with traditional DMD designs to develop new quasi-optical microcavity (QOM) structures. These absorbers, benefiting from both material and structural advantages, exhibit enhanced optical performance and thermal stability. For example, Cao and co-workers introduced a QOM structure that replaced dielectric layers with ZrB2–Al2O3 ceramic composite materials and metal layers with ZrB2, forming a multilayer absorber SiO2/Al2O3/ZrB2–Al2O3/ZrB2/ZrB2–Al2O3/ZrB2/SS, as depicted in Fig. 5(d).41 This structure achieved high spectral selectivity (α/ε = 0.965/0.16 at 82 °C) and exceptional thermal stability at 800 °C [Fig. 5(e)], achieving a total energy conversion efficiency of 67% at a working temperature of 800 °C under 1000 suns.

The DMD multilayer structured absorbers stand out for their exceptional effectiveness in both optical properties and thermal stability, making them highly promising for the development of high-performance SSAs. However, a significant drawback of these systems is their complexity and increased fabrication cost, largely due to the multilayered structure. Specifically, the fabrication process demands stringent control over the thickness of each layer, which could pose a challenge for widespread application.

Dual-ceramic structural SSAs are composed of two ceramic layers capable of absorbing light. In this design, high metal volume fraction (HMVF) ceramic serves as the primary absorption layer, while the ceramic layer with a low metal volume fraction (LMVF) serves as a destructive interference layer. Moreover, a metallic bottom layer acts as an IR reflection layer aimed at reducing IR heat loss. To minimize the reflection loss of sunlight on the SSA surface, dielectric materials with a low refractive index are employed as an antireflection layer. This configuration forms an optical gradient from the bottom to the surface, thereby enhancing the efficiency of solar energy harvesting. The structural diagram of dual-ceramic structural SSAs is shown in Fig. 6(a). These SSAs are designed to overcome the limitations of intrinsic SSAs while avoiding the complexity associated with multilayer SSAs. The dual-ceramic structure is typically achieved through the dielectric doping of metallic particles or by employing gradient nitride ceramics.

FIG. 6.

Fundamentals and advances in dielectric doping dual-ceramic SSAs. (a) Schematic of ceramic doping double-absorbing layer SSAs. Reflection spectra of (b) W–Al2O3 and (c) WTi–Al2O3-based double-absorbing layer SSAs. (d) Evolution of the microstructure of the WTi–Al2O3 SSAs after continuous vacuum annealing at 600 °C for 840 h. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., Nano Energy 37, 232–241 (2017). Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

FIG. 6.

Fundamentals and advances in dielectric doping dual-ceramic SSAs. (a) Schematic of ceramic doping double-absorbing layer SSAs. Reflection spectra of (b) W–Al2O3 and (c) WTi–Al2O3-based double-absorbing layer SSAs. (d) Evolution of the microstructure of the WTi–Al2O3 SSAs after continuous vacuum annealing at 600 °C for 840 h. Reproduced with permission from Wang et al., Nano Energy 37, 232–241 (2017). Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

Close modal

1. Dielectric doping metallic particles

Dielectric doping involves embedding metal, alloy, or metallic ceramic particles into a dielectric matrix.24 This process creates composite absorbing materials that exhibit ceramic-like characteristics in the visible spectrum, efficiently harvesting solar energy. Factors such as coating thickness, particle size, and doping concentration significantly influence solar absorption and IR emission.23 Smaller particles, higher concentrations, and thicker coatings are found to enhance solar absorption and reduce thermal emissivity, while higher doping concentrations and thinner coatings help in lowering IR emissions. The dielectric constants of metal nanoparticles and the ceramic matrix are key to effective absorption in metal-ceramic coatings. The dielectric function of such composite materials can be theoretically calculated using Eqs. (15) and (16) derived from Maxwell Garnett (MG) and Bruggeman (BR) theories,10,137
(15)
(16)
Here, εdiel and εmet represent the dielectric functions of the dielectric matrix and metal, and εMG and εBR are the average dielectric functions in the Maxwell Garnett and Bruggeman approximations, respectively. fmet is the metallic factor, denoting the volume fraction of metal in the matrix.

SSAs based on dielectric doping exhibit robust thermal stability when made with particles doped into a dielectric matrix at varying volume fractions.138 Initially, single-element metal particle doping was used to enhance the performance of SSAs. For example, Wang and co-workers revealed that the doping metal volume fraction and dual-absorbing layer thickness notably affect the reflectance spectrum.139 By adjusting these parameters, the optimized Al–AlN ceramics-based SSAs enable a high solar absorptance of 0.92 and a low IR emission of 0.10 at 600 °C. However, single-metal doping can lead to particle diffusion and oxidation at high temperatures, which reduce absorption performance. For example, the Mo–Al2O3 ceramics-based SSA experienced optical performance degradation at annealing temperatures above 400 °C, which is due to Mo diffusion and oxidation.138 Despite the optimization of metal particles and the dielectric matrix enhancing thermal stability, it remains below 600 °C.

Substituting single metals with alloys for dielectric doping has proven to enhance thermal stability. Ren and colleagues developed WNi–Al2O3 ceramic-based SSAs with superior thermal stability at 600 °C.140 This absorber also exhibited a low total hemispherical emissivity of 0.15 at 500 °C. The same group later employed yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) as a dielectric matrix to develop a WNi–YSZ ceramics-based SSA.141 It achieves a high solar absorptivity of 0.91 and a low emissivity of 0.13 at 500 °C, as well as long-term thermal stability at 600 °C. Furthermore, Cao et al. developed a WTi–Al2O3 ceramic-based SSA, which exhibits good thermal stability.142 After annealing at 600 °C in a vacuum for 840 h, it maintained a high absorption of 0.93 and a low thermal emissivity of 0.103 at 500 °C. This achieves an obvious improvement in thermal stability compared to single metal doping, as shown in Figs. 6(b) and 6(c). The enhanced high-temperature stability stems from Ti atom segregation and partial oxidation in the WTi nanoparticles, which inhibit W element diffusion and agglomeration [Fig. 6(d)]. In addition to metal and alloy doping, metallic ceramic doping has also been used to enhance stability. Wang et al. attempted to dope MoSi2 ceramic particles into an Al2O3 matrix, revealing the impact of ceramic particle doping and thickness on optical performance.143 Another study involved doping TiN into AlN and developing TixAl1-x/(TiN–AlN) HMVF/(TiN–AlN) LMVF/AlN dual-ceramic SSAs.144 This absorber achieved a high solar absorption of 0.947 and a low thermal emissivity of 0.08. After annealing at 600 °C in air, the solar selectivity decreases to α/ε = 0.92/0.16.

2. Gradient nitride ceramics

Gradient nitride ceramics have gained attention in the fabrication of double-ceramic SSAs.145–147 However, the optical properties and thermal stability of binary nitride ceramics are typically insufficient to meet practical usages. Early attempts to develop CrN-based double-ceramic structures could only maintain stability at 400 °C.87 At higher temperatures, CrN decomposition led to a decline in optical properties. Similarly, TiN-based double-ceramic structures exhibited good spectral selectivity and thermal stability, but only up to 400 °C. Element doping in nitride ceramics has been an effective approach to optimize absorbers. For example, WAlN,148 CrMoN,145 NbMoN,149 HfMoN,146 and AlHfN147 have been used to create double-absorbing layer based SSAs, effectively enhancing photothermal performance and thermal stability. In particular, the HfMoN absorber showed long-term stability at 600 °C.146 However, this strategy is needed to exactly control metal contents. In addition, the thermal stability of most of these SSAs is still less than 600 °C.

In recent years, high-entropy nitrides have emerged as promising materials to enhance the thermal stability of traditional nitride ceramics. Their remarkable high-temperature stability makes them suitable for thermal barrier coatings.150 High-entropy nitrides composed of transition metals exhibit a narrow bandgap for solar energy absorption,151 making them ideal for the fabrication of gradient nitride ceramic structures. Gao et al. prepared high-entropy nitride AlCrTaTiZrN by sputtering an AlCrTaTiZr target to create dual-ceramic structured SSA, as illustrated in Fig. 7(a).152 By adjusting the thicknesses, the absorber achieved a high solar absorptivity of 0.965 and a low thermal emissivity of 0.086 at 82 °C [Fig. 7(b)]. The AlCrTaTiZrN absorption layer plays a crucial role in increasing optical properties. After annealing at 600 °C for 10 h, the spectral selectivity showed only minor attenuation [Fig. 7(c)], indicating excellent thermal stability. Furthermore, by careful selection of components in high-entropy nitride, the same group fabricated an AlCrWTaNbTiN-based dual ceramic SSA, using Al2O3 as the anti-reflective layer [Fig. 7(d)].40 This SSA exhibits a high solar absorptance of 93% and a low emittance of 6.8% at 82 °C [Fig. 7(e)], along with long-term stability at 600 °C in a vacuum for 240 h, as shown in Fig. 7(f). Additionally, a HfNbTaTiZrN-based SSA displays a high solar absorptivity of 96%, reduced IR emissivity of 8.2% at 82 °C, and omnidirectional absorption. The entropy-driven structural stabilization of this absorber ensured long-term thermal stability, maintaining stable spectral selectivity after annealing at 600 °C for 168 h.153 Similar advancements have been made with TiVCrAlZrN,154 NbMoTaWN,155,156 AlTiZrHfNbN,157 Al0.4Hf0.6NbTaTiZrN,158 and AlMo0.5NbTa0.5TiZrN159 as components of double-ceramic SSA. Moreover, the co-sputtering method is also highly effective in the fabrication of high-entropy material-based SSAs.160–162 The vast component space offered by high-entropy materials presents significant potential for developing high-performance SSAs.

FIG. 7.

Fundamentals and advances in gradient nitride ceramics-based SSAs. (a) Structural diagram of AlCrTaTiZrN-based SSA. (b) Corresponding layer-added reflectance spectra. (c) Reflectance spectra before and after annealing at varying temperature for 10 h. Reproduced with permission from He et al., J. Mater. 7(3), 460–469 (2021). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (d) Structural diagram of AlCrWTaNbTiN-based SSA. (e) Corresponding layer-added reflectance spectra. (f) Reflectance spectra before and after annealing at 600 °C for varying durations. Reproduced with permission from He et al., Sol. RRL 5(4), 2000790 (2021). Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons.

FIG. 7.

Fundamentals and advances in gradient nitride ceramics-based SSAs. (a) Structural diagram of AlCrTaTiZrN-based SSA. (b) Corresponding layer-added reflectance spectra. (c) Reflectance spectra before and after annealing at varying temperature for 10 h. Reproduced with permission from He et al., J. Mater. 7(3), 460–469 (2021). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (d) Structural diagram of AlCrWTaNbTiN-based SSA. (e) Corresponding layer-added reflectance spectra. (f) Reflectance spectra before and after annealing at 600 °C for varying durations. Reproduced with permission from He et al., Sol. RRL 5(4), 2000790 (2021). Copyright 2021 John Wiley and Sons.

Close modal

Double-ceramic SSAs often encounter issues like interlayer elemental diffusion and oxidation, which detrimentally affect the optical properties of the resultant SSAs. Adopting a simple double-layer SSA configuration, comprising a single absorbing layer paired with an antireflection layer, can mitigate these problems. Compared to intrinsic absorbers, the antireflective layer effectively endures the stability of the absorbing layer at high temperatures. With fewer layers than multilayer or dual-ceramic SSAs, dual-layer structures are simpler to manufacture, presenting a viable solution for high-temperature solar-thermal applications. The single absorption layer needs to possess strong intrinsic spectral selectivity. Suitable materials for this layer include ultra-high temperature ceramics, ceramic composite materials, and high-entropy materials.

Kotilainen et al. employed CrOxNy as an absorption layer and SnOx as an antireflection layer, which are deposited on a Cu substrate, leading to a simple double-layer SSA.163 This absorber achieved a high solar absorption of ∼0.93 and a low thermal emissivity of 0.07. However, it failed at 500 °C due to copper atom diffusion, leading to void formation at the substrate-coating interface and increased thermal emittance. Wang et al. reported a double-layer SSA using self-doped W-WOx as an absorption layer, which led to high solar absorption of 0.91 and low thermal emission of 0.55.164 In subsequent studies, Mo-MoOx and Ti-TiOx self-doped ceramics were identified as suitable for the fabrication of double-layer SSAs.165,166 However, the thermal stability of these SSAs typically does not exceed 400 °C.

Employing ultra-high temperature ceramics at the absorption layer can effectively enhance the limited high-temperature stability. Gao and co-workers developed a TiN/Al2O3 SSA, maintaining good stability at 500 °C with respectable spectral selectivity (0.92/0.11).167 Subsequently, boride ceramics like ZrB282 and TiB2168 and carbide ceramics like TiC169,170 have been proven effective in the development of SSAs, enhancing both thermal stability and optical performance, achieving solar absorption of 0.92–0.93, IR emissivity of ∼0.11, and reliable thermal stability at 600 °C. Ceramic composite materials have also been explored for improving the thermal stability of dual-layer absorbers. A TiB2–ZrB2 composite ceramic-based dual-layer SSA was developed, showing a stable solar-thermal conversion efficiency of 82.6% after annealing at 600 °C for 100 h.29 Recently, Gao and co-workers prepared a TiB2-HfB2 ceramic composite material, SSA, using magnetron co-sputtering technology, as shown in Fig. 8(a).42 Enhanced by a novel pre-annealing strategy, the SSA exhibited a high solar absorptance of 0.932 and suppressed thermal emittance of 0.089, along with remarkable thermal stability. Its optical performance remained almost unchanged even after annealing at 800 °C for 240 h [Figs. 8(b) and 8(c)].

FIG. 8.

Fundamentals and advances in simple double-layer SSAs. (a) Structural diagram of TiB2–ZrB2-based double-layer SSA. (b) Reflectance spectra of layer-added coatings. (c) Reflectance spectra before and after annealing at varying temperatures for 100 h. Reproduced with permission from Qiu et al., Opt. Mater. 100, 109666 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (d) Structural diagram of AlCrTaTiZrN-based double-layer SSA. (e) Reflectance spectra before and after heat treatment when SiO2 served as an antireflection layer. (f) Reflectance spectra before and after heat treatment when Si3N4 served as an antireflection layer. Reproduced with permission from He et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9(10), 6413–6422 (2021). Copyright 2021 Royal Society Chemistry.

FIG. 8.

Fundamentals and advances in simple double-layer SSAs. (a) Structural diagram of TiB2–ZrB2-based double-layer SSA. (b) Reflectance spectra of layer-added coatings. (c) Reflectance spectra before and after annealing at varying temperatures for 100 h. Reproduced with permission from Qiu et al., Opt. Mater. 100, 109666 (2020). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (d) Structural diagram of AlCrTaTiZrN-based double-layer SSA. (e) Reflectance spectra before and after heat treatment when SiO2 served as an antireflection layer. (f) Reflectance spectra before and after heat treatment when Si3N4 served as an antireflection layer. Reproduced with permission from He et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9(10), 6413–6422 (2021). Copyright 2021 Royal Society Chemistry.

Close modal

High-entropy materials, primarily high-entropy nitrides have gained increasing attention to develop advanced SSAs. The entropy-induced stabilization effect and hysteresis diffusion effect have potential to inhibit oxidation and diffusion of high-entropy absorption layer. Gao et al. used high-entropy nitride AlCrTaTiZrN as absorbing layer and SiO2 or Si3N4 as antireflection layers, as shown in Fig. 8(d).171 The resulting SSA leads to an outstanding solar absorption of 92.8% and low IR emission of 5.1%. This SSA also demonstrated excellent thermal robustness, maintaining its optical performance nearly unchanged after annealing at 650 °C for 300 h [Figs. 8(e) and 8(f)]. In addition, the AlCrMoTaTiN/Al2O3 double-layer SSA achieved high spectral selectivity of α/ε = 0.929/0.082.122 Similarly, MoTaTiCrN172 and TiVCrAlZrN173 were also used as absorption layers, leading to favorable optical properties and thermal stability. Notably, incorporating Al into MoTaTiCrN ceramics has been shown to further improve thermal stability, as the presence of aluminum can form a passive film enhancing oxidation resistance. The resulting MoTaTiCr–Al–N-based double-layer SSA raised the operational temperature limit to 700 °C.174 Overall, dual-layer absorbers offer significant advantages in terms of fabrication simplicity and high-temperature thermal stability, even though their solar absorption typically remains below 0.93.

Plasmonic materials are characterized by the local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect of their nanoparticles (plasmons) under illumination. When incident light interacts with these particles, it induces LSPR due to the polarization of free electrons on their surface.30 This phenomenon involves local oscillations of highly polarizable electrons in the conduction band when exposed to light. Resonance occurs when the wavelength of the incident light matches the plasmonic wavelength on the nanoparticle surface, generating a net surface charge difference and enhancing the electric field strength.175 Therefore, optical properties like extinction (absorption and scattering) around the plasmonic nanoparticle surface are manifested as resonance absorption peaks in the absorption spectrum.

Precious metals like Au and Ag are commonly used as plasmonic nanoparticles in the fabrication of SSAs.176,177 However, due to their high cost, researchers are exploring more economical materials with effective optical properties, including transition metals,178 metal ceramics,179 and carbon materials.180 A challenge with many plasmonic materials is their narrow absorption bands, which often necessitate the creation of complex nanostructures to widen the absorption range. Additionally, to achieve low IR emission, an IR reflector is often integrated into plasmonic SSAs. Recently, Zheng et al. employed a selective leaching strategy to corrode aluminum from a Cu-doped aluminum alloy in a sodium hydroxide solution, leaving nanoscale Cu grains on the resulting porous structure [Fig. 9(a)].181 LSPR occurs when incident light hits the Cu particles in this porous structure, creating a strong electric field effect [Fig. 9(b)], resulting in high omnidirectional solar absorption of 0.94 for light incident at angles from 0° to 60°. The Al substrate serves as an IR reflector, yielding a very low thermal emissivity of 0.03 at 100 °C. The coating maintains good optical performance after thermal treatment across a range of temperatures from 100 to 400 °C [Fig. 9(c)].

FIG. 9.

Fundamentals and advances in plasmonics SSAs. (a) Schematic representation of enhanced solar absorption and suppressed thermal emission in plasmonic nanostructured SSA. (b) Cross-sectional distribution of the electric field magnitude at different wavelengths. (c) Reflectance spectra of the absorber before and after heat treatment at varying temperatures. Reproduced with permission from Zheng et al., Nano Energy 92, 106717 (2022). Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (d) Schematic representation of the colloidal TiN nanoparticle-based three-layer SSA. (e) Cross-sectional distribution of the electric field magnitude at different wavelengths. (f) Reflectance spectra of the absorber before and after heat treatment at 727 °C. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 33(1), 2005074 (2020). Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.

FIG. 9.

Fundamentals and advances in plasmonics SSAs. (a) Schematic representation of enhanced solar absorption and suppressed thermal emission in plasmonic nanostructured SSA. (b) Cross-sectional distribution of the electric field magnitude at different wavelengths. (c) Reflectance spectra of the absorber before and after heat treatment at varying temperatures. Reproduced with permission from Zheng et al., Nano Energy 92, 106717 (2022). Copyright 2021 Elsevier. (d) Schematic representation of the colloidal TiN nanoparticle-based three-layer SSA. (e) Cross-sectional distribution of the electric field magnitude at different wavelengths. (f) Reflectance spectra of the absorber before and after heat treatment at 727 °C. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 33(1), 2005074 (2020). Copyright 2020 John Wiley and Sons.

Close modal

The effectiveness of plasmonic resonance in enhancing the performance of absorbing coatings is influenced by factors such as particle size, shape, and nanostructure. Advanced nanostructure designs, including supermaterials and multilayered structures, have shown promise in furthering the development of plasmonic SSAs. For instance, Lin and co-workers designed a 3D structured carbon material called graphene supermaterial, SSA.182 Simulation of the electric field strength distribution around the grooved, ultrathin graphene supermaterial coating surface confirmed plasmon resonance on the graphene particles, achieving high light absorption and an exceptional photothermal conversion efficiency of 90.1%. Additionally, Li et al. designed a plasma metamaterial comprising a three-layer all-ceramic structure [Fig. 9(d)].71 This structure includes a mirror-like TiN reflection layer, a colloidal TiN nanoparticle absorption layer, and a SiO2 antireflection layer. The combination of in-plane plasmonic resonance absorption and out-of-plane Fabry–Pérot resonance leads to a high absorption of 95% and a low thermal emissivity of 3%, as shown in Fig. 9(e). This absorber also exhibits remarkable long-term stability at 727 °C [Fig. 9(f)], demonstrating the significant potential for high-temperature solar-thermal applications.

Quasi-blackbody materials are celebrated for their exceptional light absorption capabilities, enabling full-spectrum solar absorption. However, they typically exhibit high thermal emissivity, which leads to considerable heat loss. To address this, pseudo-blackbody absorbers often integrate optically transparent thermally insulating (OTTI) materials atop the blackbody surface.183 This approach helps to retain heat and minimize IR thermal losses, achieving spectrally selective absorption akin to that of SSAs.184 A notable advantage of quasi-blackbody materials is their relatively simple preparation method, circumventing the need for precise control over nanostructures and thickness. These low-cost, readily available black materials also demonstrate better thermal stability than SSAs, making them suitable for high-temperature applications. Furthermore, this design obviates the need for high-vacuum environments, which are typically necessary for SSAs in CSP plants.

The development of high-performance OTTI materials is crucial for reducing heat loss. As depicted in Fig. 10(a), Miljkovic and colleagues developed an OTTI aerogel through the chemical synthesis of aerogels.185 This aerogel achieved a high transmission rate of 88% in the solar spectrum and a thermally averaged emission of ∼99% at 100 °C. Instantaneous solar thermal efficiencies of about 55% at 1 sun and 80 °C were recorded. Additionally, Zhao et al. employed a low-cost, non-selective high-temperature black paint as the absorbing coating, with an absorptance of 0.97 and a thermal emissivity of 0.85–0.9.186 They applied an OTTI material on top of the black paint surface. This insulating layer effectively inhibits solid conduction and gas-phase convection while allowing 95% sunlight transmission [Fig. 10(b)]. It exhibits very low transmittance in the infrared spectrum, significantly enhancing the efficiency of solar collectors and meeting a wide range of thermal energy needs. Importantly, this structure does not require costly optical or mechanical components, enabling the collection and utilization of non-concentrated solar energy for large-scale thermal collection devices. Overall, the advancements in SSAs have encompassed a diverse range of structures, including intrinsic spectrally selective materials, multilayer structures, dual-ceramic structures, simple double-layer structures, plasmonic materials, and quasi-blackbody materials assisted by OTTI materials. To provide a detailed comparison and analysis of these various SSAs, Table I presents a summary of their key aspects such as the structure, solar absorptance, thermal emissivity, and thermal stability of some of the most recent advancements in SSAs.

FIG. 10.

Fundamentals and advances in transparent insulating materials assisted quasi-blackbody materials. (a) Fundamental principles to achieve spectrally selective absorption by combining quasi-blackbody materials and OTTI materials. Reproduced with permission from Günay et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(15), 12603–12611 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (b) The use of low scattering aerogel used as OTTI materials to inhibit IR thermal loss for the quasi-blackbody absorber. Reproduced with permission from Zhao et al., ACS Nano 13(7), 7508–7516 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 10.

Fundamentals and advances in transparent insulating materials assisted quasi-blackbody materials. (a) Fundamental principles to achieve spectrally selective absorption by combining quasi-blackbody materials and OTTI materials. Reproduced with permission from Günay et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(15), 12603–12611 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (b) The use of low scattering aerogel used as OTTI materials to inhibit IR thermal loss for the quasi-blackbody absorber. Reproduced with permission from Zhao et al., ACS Nano 13(7), 7508–7516 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Summary of key aspects such as the structure, film thickness, solar absorptance, thermal emissivity, and thermal stability of some of the recent advancements in SSAs.

TypeComposition and structureThicknessSolar absorptance (α)Thermal emittance (ε)Vacuum thermal stabilityReference
Intrinsic SSAs Ti3C2Tx MXene 15 000 nm 0.900 0.100 ⋯ 25  
CoSbx ⋯ 0.960 0.180 ⋯ 26  
Multilayer structured SSAs AlN/TiB2/AlN/Mo/AlN 446.4 nm 0.934 0.069 800 °C 136  
ZrB2–Al2O3/ZrB2/ZrB2–Al2O3-based 388 nm 0.965 0.160 800 °C 41  
Dual-ceramic structural SSAs WTi–Al2O3/W–Al2O3-based 266 nm 0.930 0.103 600 °C 142  
AlCrTaTiZrN-based 189 nm 0.965 0.086 600 °C 152  
AlCrWTaNbTiN-based 140 nm 0.930 0.068 600 °C 40  
Simple double-layer SSAs SS/TiB2-HfB2/Al2O3 161 nm 0.932 0.089 800 °C 42  
SS/MoTaTiCr–Al–N/Si3N4 143 nm 0.923 0.070 700 °C 174  
SS/AlCrTaTiZrN/Si3N4 132 nm 0.928 0.051 650 °C 171  
Plasmonic SSAs Al/rGO(NPs)/ARC 150 nm 0.920 0.040 800 °C 125  
TiN/TiN(NPs)/SiO2 220 nm 0.950 0.030 727 °C 71  
Cu(NPs) 600 nm 0.940 0.030 400 °C 181  
TypeComposition and structureThicknessSolar absorptance (α)Thermal emittance (ε)Vacuum thermal stabilityReference
Intrinsic SSAs Ti3C2Tx MXene 15 000 nm 0.900 0.100 ⋯ 25  
CoSbx ⋯ 0.960 0.180 ⋯ 26  
Multilayer structured SSAs AlN/TiB2/AlN/Mo/AlN 446.4 nm 0.934 0.069 800 °C 136  
ZrB2–Al2O3/ZrB2/ZrB2–Al2O3-based 388 nm 0.965 0.160 800 °C 41  
Dual-ceramic structural SSAs WTi–Al2O3/W–Al2O3-based 266 nm 0.930 0.103 600 °C 142  
AlCrTaTiZrN-based 189 nm 0.965 0.086 600 °C 152  
AlCrWTaNbTiN-based 140 nm 0.930 0.068 600 °C 40  
Simple double-layer SSAs SS/TiB2-HfB2/Al2O3 161 nm 0.932 0.089 800 °C 42  
SS/MoTaTiCr–Al–N/Si3N4 143 nm 0.923 0.070 700 °C 174  
SS/AlCrTaTiZrN/Si3N4 132 nm 0.928 0.051 650 °C 171  
Plasmonic SSAs Al/rGO(NPs)/ARC 150 nm 0.920 0.040 800 °C 125  
TiN/TiN(NPs)/SiO2 220 nm 0.950 0.030 727 °C 71  
Cu(NPs) 600 nm 0.940 0.030 400 °C 181  

SSAs have achieved wide photothermal conversion applications in various fields. Presently, the most widespread low-temperature application (<150 °C) is in residential solar thermal water systems, which have achieved commercialization. Other areas that have become research hotspots in recent years include solar water evaporation,187,188 personal thermal management,189 catalysis,190 deicing,191 and electricity generation.8 In terms of electricity generation, it includes CSP plants and solar thermoelectric generators (STEGs). The former represents a more mature application of solar thermal power technology.192 The latter involves an all-solid state power generation technique. This section focuses on applications of SSAs in high-temperature PTC systems and STGs.

CSP systems are becoming an alternative global electricity supply, aligning with current global calls for energy conservation and emission reduction, and are expected to meet 12% of global electricity demands by 2050.193 However, current commercial conversion efficiencies range from 12% to 37%, which is relatively low, posing greater demands on the development of new generations of commercial selective absorption coatings.194 In CSP systems, parabolic trough concentrators (PTC) are the predominant method. High-temperature SSAs applied to vacuum collector tubes are crucial for converting light to thermal energy, as shown in Fig. 11(a). These collectors operate at temperatures above 300 °C, even reaching 500–600 °C. According to the Carnot cycle, increasing operational temperature is an effective way to enhance thermoelectric conversion efficiency,195 as illustrated in Fig. 11(b). This imposes high requirements on high-temperature SSAs.

FIG. 11.

The applications of SSAs in CSP systems. (a) Schematic diagram of high-temperature heat collecting tube used in PTC systems. Reproduced with permission from Liu et al., Powder Technol. 377, 939–957 (2021). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (b) Working principle of heat engine in solar-thermal systems. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 27(31), 4585–4591 (2015). Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons.196 

FIG. 11.

The applications of SSAs in CSP systems. (a) Schematic diagram of high-temperature heat collecting tube used in PTC systems. Reproduced with permission from Liu et al., Powder Technol. 377, 939–957 (2021). Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (b) Working principle of heat engine in solar-thermal systems. Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Adv. Mater. 27(31), 4585–4591 (2015). Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons.196 

Close modal

Li and co-workers used ion beam deposition to develop a Zr0.3Al0.7N/Zr0.2Al0.8N-based multilayered SSA, achieving a high absorption of 0.953 and a low thermal emissivity of 0.079 at 400 °C with long-term thermal stability for 192 h.197 High-entropy nitride HfNbTaTiZrN dual absorbing layer based SSA shows good thermal stability. When annealed at 550 °C for 168 h, the absorber maintains a high solar absorptance of 0.938 and a low thermal emittance of 0.194 at 550 °C. The annealed SSA exhibits a good photothermal conversion efficiency of 88.8%. The service life of the SSA when used for a PTC system is estimated according to the Arrhenius equation, demonstrating that the absorber could serve 25 years at 529 °C. Valleti et al. reported a CrN/TiAlN-based SSA that shows good thermal cycling stability at 500 °C with no obvious change in optical properties after 150 cycles.198 The accelerated thermal aging tests obtained an extrapolated service life of 25 years at 411 °C. Cao et al. reported a W–SiO2 cermet-based SSA, which shows superior thermal stability at 600 °C in vacuum and reaches around 65% at this temperature under 1000 suns.27 Composite ceramic TiB2-HfB2-based SSA exhibits a good solar-thermal efficiency of 68.6% at 800 °C, which remains almost unchanged after annealing at 800 °C for 240 h.42 Recently, Wang et al. developed a MoAlSiN/Si3N4-based SSA, which exhibits a high solar absorption of 93.2% and suppressed thermal emissivity of 10.5% at 400 °C.199 This absorber retains stable optical performance even after heat treatment at 800 °C for 200 h in vacuum. Furthermore, its practical total energy conversion efficiencies of 600–800 °C are always above 57%. It is estimated that its service life at 600 °C is more than 25 years.

Thermoelectric power generation primarily relies on solar thermoelectric generators (STEGs), which create a significant temperature difference between the two surfaces of a thermoelectric generator. This is achieved using SSAs on the hot side, as depicted in Figs. 12(a) and 12(b). STEGs are solid-state devices that transform thermal energy into electrical energy via the Seebeck effect, which is generated by a temperature difference (ΔT).200–202 These devices are portable and can serve as power sources for wearable electronic gadgets. The efficacy of STEGs depends on the high figure of merit (ZT) of the thermoelectric materials and the ΔT across the device. Generating a high temperature on the thermal side by harnessing solar energy is a highly sought-after strategy.203 Nonetheless, creating a substantial temperature difference under standard low solar flux radiation is challenging, and energy loss due to convection and radiation is a common issue.202 Consequently, the high absorptance and low thermal emissivity of SSAs are crucial for converting solar energy into thermal energy, effectively minimizing heat loss due to IR emission and, therefore, enhancing the performance of solar thermoelectric generators.

FIG. 12.

The applications of SSAs in STEGs. (a) Schematic diagram of SSA-assisted STEGs. (b) Heat transfer balance in the STEG device. Reproduced with permission from Kraemer et al., Nat. Mater. 10(7), 532–538 (2011). Copyright 2011 Springer Nature. (c) Schematic diagram of a STEG that combines a commercial thermoelectric generator and CuCrMnCoAlN-based SSA. (d) A comparison of output powers between the STEG powered by SSA and the non-selective absorber. Reproduced with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14(44), 50180–50189 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 12.

The applications of SSAs in STEGs. (a) Schematic diagram of SSA-assisted STEGs. (b) Heat transfer balance in the STEG device. Reproduced with permission from Kraemer et al., Nat. Mater. 10(7), 532–538 (2011). Copyright 2011 Springer Nature. (c) Schematic diagram of a STEG that combines a commercial thermoelectric generator and CuCrMnCoAlN-based SSA. (d) A comparison of output powers between the STEG powered by SSA and the non-selective absorber. Reproduced with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14(44), 50180–50189 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

Enhancing the effectiveness of solar selective absorption coatings is a viable method to improve their thermoelectric properties. Jiang and colleagues developed a TiN-based 2D photonic crystal SSA and integrated it with a STEG device.204 This effectively increased the temperature difference in the STEG by about 32 °C, which in turn raised the open-circuit voltage by 2 V. Gao and co-workers utilized high-entropy nitride SSA to boost STEGs.182 The CuCrMnCoAlN-based dual-ceramic absorber had a high absorption of 0.952 and a low emissivity of 0.109. The high solar absorption was achieved through a combination of the interference effect and intrinsic absorption characteristics, which raised the surface temperature to 109.6 °C under one sun illumination. When combined with a commercial TEG, the device enhanced the temperature difference between both sides, achieving an open-circuit voltage of 0.174 V and an output power of 1.99 mW, as shown in Figs. 12(c) and 12(d). Employing a thermal concentration strategy to further increase the temperature difference between the hot and cold sides to 12.2 °C significantly enhanced the output power of the STEG.

Furthermore, by adopting an optical concentration strategy to achieve high temperatures on the surface of the absorber, the efficiency of the STEG can be further improved. Kraemer and others designed a STEG using SSA and high-performance nanostructured thermoelectric materials.11 When exposed to sunlight, a high temperature on the surface of the absorber was attained, enhancing the power generation efficiency to a peak of 4.6%. It is anticipated that with a figure of merit ZT of 2, an emissivity of 0.06, and an optical concentration of ten suns, a high efficiency of nearly 14% can be achieved, paving the way for a very promising strategy to enhance the conversion efficiency of STEG. Subsequently, the same group employed the optical concentration strategy to increase the light intensity to 211 kW m−2. This approach raised the reported peak efficiency from 5.2% to 9.6% and utilized high-temperature SSA to enable the concentrated STEG to operate stably in a 600 °C high-temperature vacuum environment.205 

To further improve power generation efficiency, a strategy that integrates passive radiative cooling (RC) technology with solar heat collection on TEG equipment has been proposed.206 This integration leverages radiative cooling technology, which allows heat emission from the surface of a sky-facing object in the form of electromagnetic waves through a transparent atmospheric window of 8–13 µm to the outer cold space at a mere 3 K.207–209 This method provides a cold source for TEG power generation, which can achieve power generation at night in the absence of light.210 In daylight, the system employs SSA as the primary mechanism for converting sunlight into thermal energy to create a temperature difference for power generation. At night, it uses the radiative cooler to emit heat toward cold space, obtaining a temperature difference for power generation and thus achieving continuous power generation.211,212 Zhang et al. have developed an integrated device that can simultaneously harvest energy from the sun and cold space through a TEG system combined with a solar absorber and radiative cooler, achieving uninterrupted power generation throughout the entire day.213 In contrast to conventional STEGs, this integrative approach of combining solar heating with radiative cooling represents a significant advancement in this field. It overcomes the limitations of STEGs, which are traditionally operational only during daylight hours.214 This green technology offers a potential solution to regional energy shortages and supplements existing energy infrastructure. However, the exploration of this integrated technology faces challenges, particularly in the stability of its performance. Future research should, therefore, focus on improving the efficiency and stability of continuous power generation.215 

This paper offers a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in high-temperature SSAs. It summarized the underlying principles of SSA, performance evaluation standards, fabrication methods, advanced materials, and nanostructured design of SSAs, as illustrated in Fig. 13. Among the fabrication techniques, magnetron sputtering is highly regarded for producing high-quality films, which can exactly control the thickness of each layer and achieve roll-to-roll large-area production. However, this technique requires costly equipment, and the utilization ratio of the target is relatively low. On the other hand, the sol–gel technique, gaining increasing attention due to its cost-effectiveness and simplicity, has been applied in preparing high-performance SSAs. However, the spectral selectivity of the absorber fabricated by this technique needs to be improved.

FIG. 13.

An overview of the evolution of advanced SSAs: preparation methods, materials selection, nanostructure design, and applications. Adapted with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14(44), 50180–50189 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 13.

An overview of the evolution of advanced SSAs: preparation methods, materials selection, nanostructure design, and applications. Adapted with permission from Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14(44), 50180–50189 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

The development of materials science and technology provides many advanced materials suitable for the preparation of high-performance SSA. These materials include ceramic composites, 2D MXenes, high-entropy materials, and graphene, which exhibit superior capabilities compared to traditional photothermal materials. For example, ceramic composites and high-entropy materials have enhanced the thermal stability of SSAs to above 700 °C, which has outperformed commercial and state-of-the-art SSAs. These high thermal stability materials are highly sought after for their potential in demanding applications like CSP systems and solar thermoelectric generators. In addition, by taking advantage of carefully designed nanostructures, both spectral selectivity and thermal stability can be advanced. These include intrinsic absorbers, DMD multilayer structures, dual-ceramic absorption layers, dual-layer structures, plasma absorbers, and OTTI assisted quasi-blackbody materials. Each type has its own unique features and limitations. For instance, intrinsic SSAs, while simple in design, are constrained in terms of spectral selectivity, thermal stability, and their scarcity in nature. DMD multilayer structure and plasma absorber have recorded the highest stable temperatures in current research but face practical application challenges due to their complex fabrication process. The OTTI assisted quasi-blackbody materials using transparent heat insulating materials to achieve spectral selectivity have good thermal stability independent of a stringent vacuum environment. In addition, the fabrication of quasi-blackbody materials avoids the careful control of thicknesses, showing great promise for practical applications. However, this absorber required high-performance transparent heat insulating materials.

The next-generation CSP systems are conjectured to need SSAs that could endure high temperatures above 700 °C. This poses a great challenge to advance the stability of SSAs. The combination of these advanced photothermal materials and nanostructures to further improve the performance of SSA is a promising approach to this end. In particular, the studies on the photothermal performance of 2D MXenes and high-entropy materials are still in their initial stages. These materials have a very abundant composition for the optimization of optical properties and thermal stability. So far, high-entropy materials for the fabrication of SSAs are mainly concentrated on high-entropy nitrides. The potential of other high-entropy materials, such as high-entropy carbides and high-entropy borides, for SSAs needs further research.

This work was supported by the Regional Key Projects of Science and Technology Service Network Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences No. KFJ-STS-QYZD-139, the Key Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics CAS (No. KJZLZD-4), the CAS “Light of West China” Program, and the Major Science and Technology Projects of Gansu Province (No. 20ZD7GF011).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Zhuo-Hao Zhou: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Writing – original draft (equal). Cheng-Yu He: Conceptualization (lead); Validation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Xiang-Hu Gao: Conceptualization (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
2.
M.
Hosenuzzaman
,
N. A.
Rahim
,
J.
Selvaraj
,
M.
Hasanuzzaman
,
A. B. M. A.
Malek
, and
A.
Nahar
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
41
,
284
(
2015
).
3.
X.
Cui
,
Q.
Ruan
,
X.
Zhuo
,
X.
Xia
,
J.
Hu
,
R.
Fu
,
Y.
Li
,
J.
Wang
, and
H.
Xu
,
Chem. Rev.
123
(
11
),
6891
(
2023
).
4.
C.
Xu
,
P.
Ravi Anusuyadevi
,
C.
Aymonier
,
R.
Luque
, and
S.
Marre
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
48
(
14
),
3868
(
2019
).
5.
Y.
Chen
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
15
(
7
),
2843
(
2022
).
6.
M. A.
Sabiha
,
R.
Saidur
,
S.
Mekhilef
, and
O.
Mahian
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
51
,
1038
(
2015
).
8.
L. A.
Weinstein
,
J.
Loomis
,
B.
Bhatia
,
D. M.
Bierman
,
E. N.
Wang
, and
G.
Chen
,
Chem. Rev.
115
(
23
),
12797
(
2015
).
9.
H.
Yao
,
Q.
Liao
,
H.
Cheng
, and
L.
Qu
,
Nano Res.
17
(
1
),
112
131
(
2024
).
10.
A.
Dan
,
H. C.
Barshilia
,
K.
Chattopadhyay
, and
B.
Basu
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
79
,
1050
(
2017
).
11.
D.
Kraemer
,
B.
Poudel
,
H.-P.
Feng
,
J. C.
Caylor
,
B.
Yu
,
X.
Yan
,
Y.
Ma
,
X.
Wang
,
D.
Wang
,
A.
Muto
,
K.
McEnaney
,
M.
Chiesa
,
Z.
Ren
, and
G.
Chen
,
Nat. Mater.
10
(
7
),
532
538
(
2011
).
12.
Z.
Li
,
X.
Xu
,
X.
Sheng
,
P.
Lin
,
J.
Tang
,
L.
Pan
,
Y. V.
Kaneti
,
T.
Yang
, and
Y.
Yamauchi
,
ACS Nano
15
(
8
),
12535
(
2021
).
13.
L.
Zhao
,
B.
Bhatia
,
L.
Zhang
,
E.
Strobach
,
A.
Leroy
,
M. K.
Yadav
,
S.
Yang
,
T. A.
Cooper
,
L. A.
Weinstein
,
A.
Modi
,
S. B.
Kedare
,
G.
Chen
, and
E. N.
Wang
,
Joule
4
(
12
),
2733
(
2020
).
14.
H.
Zhai
,
D.
Fan
, and
Q.
Li
,
Nano Energy
100
,
107435
(
2022
).
15.
B.
Liu
,
C.
Wang
,
S.
Bazri
,
I. A.
Badruddin
,
Y.
Orooji
,
S.
Saeidi
,
S.
Wongwises
, and
O.
Mahian
,
Powder Technol.
377
,
939
957
(
2021
).
16.
C.
Fei Guo
,
T.
Sun
,
F.
Cao
,
Q.
Liu
, and
Z.
Ren
,
Light: Sci. Appl.
3
(
4
),
e161
(
2014
).
17.
A. W.
Porter
,
Nature
116
(
2918
),
497
(
1925
).
18.
J.
Martinek
,
S.
Jape
, and
C. S.
Turchi
,
Sol. Energy
222
,
115
(
2021
).
19.
K. M.
Chung
,
J.
Zeng
,
S. R.
Adapa
,
T.
Feng
,
M. V.
Bagepalli
,
P. G.
Loutzenhiser
,
K. J.
Albrecht
,
C. K.
Ho
, and
R.
Chen
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
230
,
111271
(
2021
).
20.
H.
Paul
,
D. M.
Greenberger
,
S. T.
Stenholm
, and
W. P.
Schleich
,
Phys. Scr.
T165
,
014027
(
2015
).
21.
H.
Tabor
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
47
(
8
),
1271
(
1961
).
22.
K.
Xu
,
M.
Du
,
L.
Hao
,
J.
Mi
,
Q.
Yu
, and
S.
Li
,
J. Mater.
6
(
1
),
167
(
2020
).
23.
F.
Cao
,
K.
McEnaney
,
G.
Chen
, and
Z.
Ren
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
7
(
5
),
1615
(
2014
).
24.
L.
Noč
and
I.
Jerman
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
238
,
111625
(
2022
).
25.
Y.
Li
,
C.
Xiong
,
H.
Huang
,
X.
Peng
,
D.
Mei
,
M.
Li
,
G.
Liu
,
M.
Wu
,
T.
Zhao
, and
B.
Huang
,
Adv. Mater.
33
(
41
),
2103054
(
2021
).
26.
A.
Taranova
,
K.
Akbar
,
K.
Yusupov
,
S.
You
,
V.
Polewczyk
,
S.
Mauri
,
E.
Balliana
,
J.
Rosen
,
P.
Moras
,
A.
Gradone
,
V.
Morandi
,
E.
Moretti
, and
A.
Vomiero
,
Nat. Commun.
14
(
1
),
7280
(
2023
).
27.
Z.
Wu
,
Y.
Liu
,
D.
Wei
,
L.
Yin
,
F.
Bai
,
X.
Liu
,
Q.
Zhang
, and
F.
Cao
,
Mater. Today Phys.
9
,
100089
(
2019
).
28.
X.-L.
Qiu
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
C.-Y.
He
,
B.-H.
Chen
, and
G.
Liu
,
RSC Adv.
9
(
51
),
29726
(
2019
).
29.
X.-L.
Qiu
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
C.-Y.
He
, and
G.
Liu
,
Opt. Mater.
100
,
109666
(
2020
).
30.
B.
Yang
,
C.
Li
,
Z.
Wang
, and
Q.
Dai
,
Adv. Mater.
34
(
26
),
2107351
(
2022
).
31.
H.
Lin
,
B. C. P.
Sturmberg
,
K.-T.
Lin
,
Y.
Yang
,
X.
Zheng
,
T. K.
Chong
,
C. M.
de Sterke
, and
B.
Jia
,
Nat. Photonics
13
(
4
),
270
(
2019
).
32.
X.-H.
Gao
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
Y.-Q.
Shen
,
C.-Y.
He
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
203
,
110187
(
2019
).
33.
X.-L.
Qiu
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
C.-Y.
He
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
211
,
110533
(
2020
).
34.
M.
Shi
,
M.
Shen
,
X.
Guo
,
X.
Jin
,
Y.
Cao
,
Y.
Yang
,
W.
Wang
, and
J.
Wang
,
ACS Nano
15
(
7
),
11396
(
2021
).
35.
D.
Xu
,
Z.
Li
,
L.
Li
, and
J.
Wang
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
30
(
47
),
2000712
(
2020
).
36.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
M.
Dong
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
J.-H.
An
,
H.-X.
Guo
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
217
,
110709
(
2020
).
37.
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
H.
Zhang
,
K.
Chen
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
Z.-W.
Lu
,
Y.
Li
,
P.-Q.
La
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Advanced Science
10
(
3
),
2204817
(
2023
).
38.
Y.
Cheng
,
S.
Cheng
,
B.
Chen
,
J.
Jiang
,
C.
Tu
,
W.
Li
,
Y.
Yang
,
K.
Huang
,
K.
Wang
,
H.
Yuan
,
J.
Li
,
Y.
Qi
, and
Z.
Liu
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
144
(
34
),
15562
(
2022
).
39.
Z.
Xie
,
Y.
Duo
,
Z.
Lin
,
T.
Fan
,
C.
Xing
,
L.
Yu
,
R.
Wang
,
M.
Qiu
,
Y.
Zhang
,
Y.
Zhao
,
X.
Yan
, and
H.
Zhang
,
Advanced Science
7
(
5
),
1902236
(
2020
).
40.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
H.-X.
Guo
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. RRL
5
(
4
),
2000790
(
2021
).
41.
J.
Wang
,
Z.
Ren
,
Y.
Luo
,
Z.
Wu
,
Y.
Liu
,
S.
Hou
,
X.
Liu
,
Q.
Zhang
, and
F.
Cao
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
13
(
34
),
40522
40530
(
2021
).
42.
X.-L.
Qiu
,
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Mater. Today Phys.
24
,
100690
(
2022
).
43.
J. C.
Maxwell
,
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London
155
,
459
(
1997
).
44.
A.
Biswas
,
D.
Bhattacharyya
,
H. C.
Barshilia
,
N.
Selvakumar
, and
K. S.
Rajam
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
254
(
6
),
1694
(
2008
).
45.
H. C.
Barshilia
,
N.
Selvakumar
,
K. S.
Rajam
,
D. V.
Sridhara Rao
,
K.
Muraleedharan
, and
A.
Biswas
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
(
19
),
191909
(
2006
).
46.
T. S.
Kuhn
and
S.
Goldberg
,
Am. J. Phys.
48
(
4
),
327
(
1980
).
47.
K.
Burlafinger
,
A.
Vetter
, and
C. J.
Brabec
,
Sol. Energy
120
,
428
(
2015
).
48.
D.
Chester
,
P.
Bermel
,
J. D.
Joannopoulos
,
M.
Soljacic
, and
I.
Celanovic
,
Opt. Express
19
(
S3
),
A245
(
2011
).
49.
X.
Wang
,
X.
Yu
,
S.
Fu
,
E.
Lee
,
K.
Kekalo
, and
J.
Liu
,
J. Appl. Phys.
123
(
3
),
033104
(
2018
).
50.
Q. C.
Zhang
,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
32
(
15
),
1938
(
1999
).
51.
R.
Escobar-Galindo
,
E.
Guillén
,
I.
Heras
,
G.
Rincón-Llorente
,
M.
Alcón-Camas
,
F.
Lungwitz
,
F.
Munnik
,
E.
Schumann
,
I.
Azkona
, and
M.
Krause
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
185
,
183
(
2018
).
52.
L.
Rebouta
,
P.
Capela
,
M.
Andritschky
,
A.
Matilainen
,
P.
Santilli
,
K.
Pischow
, and
E.
Alves
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
105
,
202
(
2012
).
53.
B.
Window
,
I. T.
Ritchie
, and
K.
Cathro
,
Appl. Opt.
17
(
16
),
2637
(
1978
).
54.
J. S.
Vaishya
and
T. C.
Tripathi
,
Energy Convers. Manage.
26
(
3-4
),
291
(
1986
).
55.
P. M.
Driver
,
R. W.
Jones
,
C. L.
Riddiford
, and
R. J.
Simpson
,
Sol. Energy
19
(
3
),
301
(
1977
).
56.
57.
N.
Selvakumar
and
H. C.
Barshilia
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
98
,
1
(
2012
).
58.
S. M.
Rossnagel
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A
38
(
6
),
060805
(
2020
).
59.
J. T.
Gudmundsson
,
Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.
29
(
11
),
113001
(
2020
).
60.
H. C.
Barshilia
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
130
,
322
(
2014
).
61.
Y.
Li
,
C.
Lin
,
D.
Zhou
,
Y.
An
,
D.
Li
,
C.
Chi
,
H.
Huang
,
S.
Yang
,
C. Y.
Tso
,
C. Y. H.
Chao
, and
B.
Huang
,
Nano Energy
64
,
103947
(
2019
).
62.
A.
Al-Rjoub
,
P.
Costa
,
L.
Rebouta
,
I. B.
Radović
,
K.
Arstila
,
N. P.
Barradas
,
E.
Alves
,
A.
Matilainen
, and
K.
Pischow
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B
450
,
195
(
2019
).
63.
Y.
Ning
,
C.
Wang
,
W.
Wang
,
E.
Tomasella
,
Y.
Sun
,
P.
Song
,
W.
Hao
, and
A.
Bousquet
,
J. Mater.
6
(
4
),
760
(
2020
).
64.
L. L.
Hench
and
J. K.
West
,
Chem. Rev.
90
(
1
),
33
(
1990
).
65.
Y.
Wang
,
S.
Ge-Zhang
,
P.
Mu
,
X.
Wang
,
S.
Li
,
L.
Qiao
, and
H.
Mu
,
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
24
,
9675
(
2023
).
66.
S.
Amiri
and
A.
Rahimi
,
Iran. Polym. J.
25
(
6
),
559
(
2016
).
67.
S.
Obregón
and
V.
Rodríguez-González
,
J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.
102
(
1
),
125
(
2022
).
68.
G.
Katumba
,
L.
Olumekor
,
A.
Forbes
,
G.
Makiwa
,
B.
Mwakikunga
,
J.
Lu
, and
E.
Wäckelgård
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
92
(
10
),
1285
(
2008
).
69.
H. C.
Barshilia
,
R. V.
Lakshmi
,
P.
Bera
,
B.
Bai J Basu
,
G.
Srinivas
,
V.
Praveen Kumar
, and
N. T.
Manikandanath
,
Sol. Energy
239
,
283
(
2022
).
70.
X.
Paquez
,
G.
Amiard
,
G.
de Combarieu
,
C. .
Boissière
, and
D.
Grosso
,
Chem. Mater.
27
(
7
),
2711
(
2015
).
71.
Y.
Li
,
C.
Lin
,
Z.
Wu
,
Z.
Chen
,
C.
Chi
,
F.
Cao
,
D.
Mei
,
H.
Yan
,
C. Y.
Tso
,
C. Y. H.
Chao
, and
B.
Huang
,
Adv. Mater.
33
(
1
),
2005074
(
2021
).
72.
D.
Sciti
,
L.
Silvestroni
,
D. M.
Trucchi
,
E.
Cappelli
,
S.
Orlando
, and
E.
Sani
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
132
,
460
(
2015
).
73.
Y.
Wei
,
P.
Zhang
,
R. A.
Soomro
,
Q.
Zhu
, and
B.
Xu
,
Adv. Mater.
33
(
39
),
2103148
(
2021
).
74.
M.
Massicotte
,
P.
Schmidt
,
F.
Vialla
,
K.
Watanabe
,
T.
Taniguchi
,
K. J.
Tielrooij
, and
F. H. L.
Koppens
,
Nat. Commun.
7
(
1
),
12174
(
2016
).
75.
E. P.
George
,
D.
Raabe
, and
R. O.
Ritchie
,
Nat. Rev. Mater.
4
(
8
),
515
(
2019
).
76.
X.
Wu
, et al,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
476
,
130157
(
2024
).
77.
Y.
Li
,
C.
Lin
,
J.
Huang
,
C.
Chi
, and
B.
Huang
,
Global Challenges
5
(
1
),
2000058
(
2021
).
78.
E.
Sani
,
L.
Mercatelli
,
M.
Meucci
,
A.
Balbo
,
C.
Musa
,
R.
Licheri
,
R.
Orrù
, and
G.
Cao
,
Renewable Energy
91
,
340
(
2016
).
79.
R. K.
Poobalan
,
H. C.
Barshilia
, and
B.
Basu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
245
,
111876
(
2022
).
80.
E.
Sani
,
M.
Meucci
,
L.
Mercatelli
,
A.
Balbo
,
C.
Musa
,
R.
Licheri
,
R.
Orrù
, and
G.
Cao
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
169
,
313
(
2017
).
81.
X.-H.
Gao
,
Z.-M.
Guo
,
Q.-F.
Geng
,
P.-J.
Ma
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
157
,
543
(
2016
).
82.
X.-H.
Gao
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
X.-T.
Li
,
W.
Theiss
,
B.-H.
Chen
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
T.-H.
Zhou
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
193
,
178
(
2019
).
83.
S.
Cho
,
I.
Jo
,
Y.-H.
Lee
,
Y. W.
Yoo
,
E.
Byon
,
S.-K.
Lee
, and
S.-B.
Lee
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
448
,
407
(
2018
).
84.
J.
He
,
Y.
Cao
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Wang
,
Ceram. Int.
44
(
6
),
6520
(
2018
).
85.
R. K.
Poobalan
,
M. P.
Singh
, and
B.
Basu
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
105
(
2
),
1136
(
2022
).
86.
H. A.
Abd El-Fattah
,
M. H.
Shazly
,
I. S.
El Mahallawi
, and
W. A.
Khalifa
,
Mater. Express
9
(
1
),
15
(
2019
).
87.
T. K.
Tsai
,
Y. H.
Li
, and
J. S.
Fang
,
Thin Solid Films
615
,
91
(
2016
).
88.
E.
Randich
and
D. D.
Allred
,
Thin Solid Films
83
(
4
),
393
(
1981
).
89.
X.-H.
Gao
,
Z.-M.
Guo
,
Q.-F.
Geng
,
P.-J.
Ma
,
A.-Q.
Wang
, and
G.
Liu
,
RSC Adv.
6
(
68
),
63867
(
2016
).
90.
X.-H.
Gao
,
Z.-M.
Guo
,
Q.-F.
Geng
,
P.-J.
Ma
,
A.-Q.
Wang
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy
140
,
199
(
2016
).
91.
X.-H.
Gao
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
T.-H.
Zhou
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
176
,
93
(
2018
).
92.
M.
Naguib
,
M.
Kurtoglu
,
V.
Presser
,
J.
Lu
,
J.
Niu
,
M.
Heon
,
L.
Hultman
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
M. W.
Barsoum
,
Adv. Mater.
23
(
37
),
4248
(
2011
).
93.
M.
Naguib
,
M. W.
Barsoum
, and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Adv. Mater.
33
(
39
),
2103393
(
2021
).
94.
M.
Boota
and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
9
(
7
),
1802917
(
2019
).
95.
Á.
Morales-García
,
F.
Calle-Vallejo
, and
F.
Illas
,
ACS Catal.
10
(
22
),
13487
(
2020
).
96.
F.
Ming
,
H.
Liang
,
G.
Huang
,
Z.
Bayhan
, and
H. N.
Alshareef
,
Adv. Mater.
33
(
1
),
2004039
(
2021
).
97.
M.
Hu
,
H.
Zhang
,
T.
Hu
,
B.
Fan
,
X.
Wang
, and
Z.
Li
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
49
(
18
),
6666
(
2020
).
98.
J.
Chen
,
Q.
Huang
,
H.
Huang
,
L.
Mao
,
M.
Liu
,
X.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Wei
,
Nanoscale
12
(
6
),
3574
(
2020
).
99.
Y.
Dong
,
S.
Chertopalov
,
K.
Maleski
,
B.
Anasori
,
L.
Hu
,
S.
Bhattacharya
,
A. M.
Rao
,
Y.
Gogotsi
,
V. N.
Mochalin
, and
R.
Podila
,
Adv. Mater.
30
(
10
),
1705714
(
2018
).
100.
M.-S.
Cao
,
Y.-Z.
Cai
,
P.
He
,
J.-C.
Shu
,
W.-Q.
Cao
, and
J.
Yuan
,
Chem. Eng. J.
359
,
1265
(
2019
).
101.
Y.
Zhang
,
K.
Ruan
,
Y.
Guo
, and
J.
Gu
,
Adv. Photonics Res.
4
(
12
),
2300224
(
2023
).
102.
X.
Jiang
,
S.
Liu
,
W.
Liang
,
S.
Luo
,
Z.
He
,
Y.
Ge
,
H.
Wang
,
R.
Cao
,
F.
Zhang
,
Q.
Wen
,
J.
Li
,
Q.
Bao
,
D.
Fan
, and
H.
Zhang
,
Laser Photonics Rev.
12
(
2
),
1700229
(
2018
).
103.
R.
Li
,
L.
Zhang
,
L.
Shi
, and
P.
Wang
,
ACS Nano
11
(
4
),
3752
(
2017
).
104.
Y.
Lu
,
D.
Fan
,
H.
Xu
,
H.
Min
,
C.
Lu
,
Z.
Lin
, and
X.
Yang
,
Sol. RRL
4
(
9
),
2000232
(
2020
).
105.
H.
Lin
,
X.
Wang
,
L.
Yu
,
Y.
Chen
, and
J.
Shi
,
Nano Lett.
17
(
1
),
384
(
2017
).
106.
J. W.
Yeh
,
S. K.
Chen
,
S. J.
Lin
,
J. Y.
Gan
,
T. S.
Chin
,
T. T.
Shun
,
C. H.
Tsau
, and
S. Y.
Chang
,
Adv. Eng. Mater.
6
(
5
),
299
(
2004
).
107.
B.
Cantor
,
I. T. H.
Chang
,
P.
Knight
, and
A. J. B.
Vincent
,
Mater. Sci. Eng.: A
375-377
,
213
(
2004
).
108.
F.
Maosen
,
M.
Xiao
,
Z.
Kangning
et al,
iScience
24
(
3
),
102177
(
2021
).
109.
X.
Wang
,
W.
Guo
, and
Y.
Fu
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
9
(
2
),
663
(
2021
).
110.
C.-H.
Lai
,
S.-J.
Lin
,
J.-W.
Yeh
, and
S.-Y.
Chang
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
201
(
6
),
3275
(
2006
).
111.
P.
Sarker
,
T.
Harrington
,
C.
Toher
,
C.
Oses
,
M.
Samiee
,
J.-P.
Maria
,
D. W.
Brenner
,
K. S.
Vecchio
, and
S.
Curtarolo
,
Nat. Commun.
9
(
1
),
4980
(
2018
).
112.
C. M.
Rost
,
E.
Sachet
,
T.
Borman
,
A.
Moballegh
,
E. C.
Dickey
,
D.
Hou
,
J. L.
Jones
,
S.
Curtarolo
, and
J.-P.
Maria
,
Nat. Commun.
6
(
1
),
8485
(
2015
).
113.
W.-M.
Wang
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
S.-J.
Zhao
,
Z.-Q.
Wang
,
Z.-W.
Lu
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
G.-Y.
Ren
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
33
(
43
),
2303197
(
2023
).
114.
H.-X.
Guo
,
W.-M.
Wang
,
C.-Y.
He
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
14
(
1
),
1950
(
2022
).
115.
J.
Gild
,
Y.
Zhang
,
T.
Harrington
,
S.
Jiang
,
T.
Hu
,
M. C.
Quinn
,
W. M.
Mellor
,
N.
Zhou
,
K.
Vecchio
, and
J.
Luo
,
Sci. Rep.
6
(
1
),
37946
(
2016
).
116.
C.
Oses
,
C.
Toher
, and
S.
Curtarolo
,
Nat. Rev. Mater.
5
(
4
),
295
(
2020
).
117.
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Liao
,
J.
Zhang
,
E.
Huang
,
L.
Ji
,
Z.
Zhang
,
R.
Zhao
,
Z.
Zhang
,
B.
Yang
,
Y.
Zhang
,
B.
Xu
,
G.
Qin
, and
X.
Zhang
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
60
(
52
),
27113
(
2021
).
118.
M.
Brahlek
,
M.
Gazda
,
V.
Keppens
,
A. R.
Mazza
,
S. J.
McCormack
,
A.
Mielewczyk-Gryń
,
B.
Musico
,
K.
Page
,
C. M.
Rost
,
S. B.
Sinnott
,
C.
Toher
,
T. Z.
Ward
, and
A.
Yamamoto
,
APL Mater.
10
(
11
),
110902
(
2022
).
119.
H.-X.
Guo
,
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
Y.-Q.
Shen
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
209
,
110444
(
2020
).
120.
P.
Song
,
C.
Wang
,
J.
Ren
,
Y.
Sun
,
Y.
Zhang
,
A.
Bousquet
,
T.
Sauvage
, and
E.
Tomasella
,
Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater.
27
(
10
),
1371
(
2020
).
121.
W.-J.
Sheng
,
X.
Yang
,
J.
Zhu
,
C.
Wang
, and
Y.
Zhang
,
Rare Met.
37
(
8
),
682
(
2018
).
122.
H.-X.
Guo
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
S.-S.
Zhao
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Surf. Interfaces
24
,
101062
(
2021
).
123.
Q.
Xing
,
J.
Ma
,
C.
Wang
, and
Y.
Zhang
,
ACS Comb. Sci.
20
(
11
),
602
(
2018
).
124.
V.
Pelenovich
,
H.
Liu
,
X.
Zeng
,
Y.
Liu
,
K.
Liu
, and
B.
Yang
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
230
,
111188
(
2021
).
125.
S.
Barbarossa
,
R.
Orrù
,
G.
Cao
,
A.
Balbo
,
F.
Zanotto
, and
E.
Sani
,
J. Alloys Compd.
935
,
167965
(
2023
).
126.
G.
Yang
,
L.
Li
,
W. B.
Lee
, and
M. C.
Ng
,
Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.
19
(
1
),
613
(
2018
).
127.
L.
Zhu
,
M.
Gao
,
C. K. N.
Peh
, and
G. W.
Ho
,
Mater. Horiz.
5
(
3
),
323
(
2018
).
128.
M.
Gao
,
L.
Zhu
,
C. K. N.
Peh
, and
G. W.
Ho
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
12
(
3
),
841
(
2019
).
129.
Y.
Peng
,
W.
Zhao
,
F.
Ni
,
W.
Yu
, and
X.
Liu
,
ACS Nano
15
(
12
),
19490
(
2021
).
130.
K.-T.
Lin
,
H.
Lin
,
T.
Yang
, and
B.
Jia
,
Nat. Commun.
11
(
1
),
1389
(
2020
).
131.
K.
Zhang
,
L.
Hao
,
M.
Du
,
J.
Mi
,
J.-N.
Wang
, and
J.-p.
Meng
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
67
,
1282
(
2017
).
132.
F.-D.
Lai
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
389
,
125503
(
2020
).
133.
Z. Y.
Nuru
,
M.
Msimanga
,
T. F. G.
Muller
,
C. J.
Arendse
,
C.
Mtshali
, and
M.
Maaza
,
Sol. Energy
111
,
357
(
2015
).
134.
H. C.
Barshilia
,
N.
Selvakumar
,
K. S.
Rajam
, and
A.
Biswas
,
J. Appl. Phys.
103
(
2
),
023507
(
2008
).
135.
N.
Khoza
,
Z. Y.
Nuru
,
J.
Sackey
,
L.
Kotsedi
,
N.
Matinise
,
C.
Ndlangamandla
, and
M.
Maaza
,
J. Alloys Compd.
773
,
975
(
2019
).
136.
J.
Ren
,
D.
Liang
,
H.
Liu
,
Y.
Yang
,
A.
Li
,
Y.
Sun
, and
C.
Wang
,
Mater. Today Phys.
34
,
101092
(
2023
).
137.
D. A. G.
Bruggeman
,
Ann. Phys.
416
(
7
),
636
(
1935
).
138.
S.
Zhao
and
E.
Wäckelgård
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
90
(
13
),
1861
(
2006
).
139.
Y.
Ning
,
W.
Wang
,
Y.
Sun
,
Y.
Wu
,
H.
Man
,
C.
Wang
,
S.
Zhao
,
E.
Tomasella
,
A.
Bousquet
, and
Y.
Zhang
,
Infrared Phys. Technol.
80
,
65
(
2017
).
140.
F.
Cao
,
D.
Kraemer
,
T.
Sun
,
Y.
Lan
,
G.
Chen
, and
Z.
Ren
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
5
(
2
),
1401042
(
2015
).
141.
F.
Cao
,
D.
Kraemer
,
L.
Tang
,
Y.
Li
,
A. P.
Litvinchuk
,
J.
Bao
,
G.
Chen
, and
Z.
Ren
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
8
(
10
),
3040
(
2015
).
142.
X.
Wang
,
J.
Gao
,
H.
Hu
,
H.
Zhang
,
L.
Liang
,
K.
Javaid
,
F.
Zhuge
,
H.
Cao
, and
L.
Wang
,
Nano Energy
37
,
232
(
2017
).
143.
Y.
Xue
,
C.
Wang
,
Y.
Sun
,
Y.
Wu
,
Y.
Ning
, and
W.
Wang
,
Vacuum
104
,
116
(
2014
).
144.
L.
Hao
,
M.
Du
,
X. P.
Liu
,
S. M.
Wang
,
L. J.
Jiang
,
F.
,
Z. N.
Li
, and
J.
Mi
,
Sci. China: Technol. Sci.
53
(
6
),
1507
(
2010
).
145.
N.
Selvakumar
,
S.
Santhoshkumar
,
S.
Basu
,
A.
Biswas
, and
H. C.
Barshilia
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
109
,
97
(
2013
).
146.
N.
Selvakumar
,
N. T.
Manikandanath
,
A.
Biswas
, and
H. C.
Barshilia
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
102
,
86
(
2012
).
147.
N.
Selvakumar
,
A.
Biswas
,
K.
Rajaguru
,
G. M.
Gouda
, and
H. C.
Barshilia
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
137
,
219
(
2015
).
148.
A.
Dan
,
A.
Biswas
,
P.
Sarkar
,
S.
Kashyap
,
K.
Chattopadhyay
,
H. C.
Barshilia
, and
B.
Basu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
176
,
157
(
2018
).
149.
P.
Song
,
Y.
Wu
,
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Sun
,
Y.
Ning
,
Y.
Zhang
,
B.
Dai
,
E.
Tomasella
,
A.
Bousquet
, and
C.
Wang
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
171
,
253
(
2017
).
150.
R.
Li
,
M.
Li
,
C.
Jiang
,
B.
Qiao
,
W.
Zhang
, and
J.
Xu
,
J. Alloys Compd.
773
,
482
(
2019
).
151.
P.
Edalati
,
Q.
Wang
,
H.
Razavi-Khosroshahi
,
M.
Fuji
,
T.
Ishihara
, and
K.
Edalati
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
8
(
7
),
3814
(
2020
).
152.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
S.-S.
Zhao
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
J. Mater.
7
(
3
),
460
469
(
2021
).
153.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
S.-S.
Zhao
,
H.-X.
Guo
, and
G.
Liu
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
9
(
37
),
21270
(
2021
).
154.
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Sol. RRL
6
(
1
),
2100752
(
2022
).
155.
D. M.
Yu
,
C. Y.
He
,
X. L.
Qiu
,
S. S.
Zhao
,
H. X.
Guo
,
G.
Liu
, and
X. H.
Gao
,
Mater. Today Energy
21
,
100789
(
2021
).
156.
D.-M.
Yu
,
C.-Y.
He
,
S.-S.
Zhao
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
J. Mater.
7
(
5
),
895
(
2021
).
157.
S.-S.
Zhao
,
C.-Y.
He
,
K.
Chen
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
10
(
24
),
9266
(
2022
).
158.
S.-S.
Zhao
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
C.-Y.
He
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
ACS Appl. Nano Mater.
4
(
5
),
4504
(
2021
).
159.
S.-S.
Zhao
,
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
P.
Zhao
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
G.
Liu
,
X.-H.
Gao
, and
G.-K.
Tian
,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
5
(
7
),
9214
(
2022
).
160.
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
Z.-W.
Lu
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
G.
Liu
, and
P.-Q.
La
,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
5
(
9
),
11517
(
2022
).
161.
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
G.
Liu
, and
P.-Q.
La
,
J. Alloys Compd.
934
,
167899
(
2023
).
162.
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
G.
Liu
, and
P.-Q.
La
,
Mater. Lett.
329
,
133198
(
2022
).
163.
M.
Kotilainen
,
M.
Honkanen
,
K.
Mizohata
, and
P.
Vuoristo
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
145
,
323
(
2016
).
164.
H.
Wen
,
W.
Wang
,
W.
Wang
,
J.
Su
,
T.
Lei
, and
C.
Wang
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
202
,
110152
(
2019
).
165.
W.
Wang
,
X.
Huan
, and
C.
Wang
,
Surf. Interfaces
21
,
100654
(
2020
).
166.
W.
Zhang
,
C.
Wang
,
Y.
Wang
,
G.
Shi
,
F.
Wang
, and
R.
Yang
,
Ceram. Int.
49
(
4
),
6739
(
2023
).
167.
X.-H.
Gao
,
Z.-M.
Guo
,
Q.-F.
Geng
,
P.-J.
Ma
,
A.-Q.
Wang
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
163
,
91
(
2017
).
168.
X.-L.
Qiu
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
T.-H.
Zhou
,
B.-H.
Chen
,
J.-Z.
Lu
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
X.-T.
Li
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy
181
,
88
(
2019
).
169.
X.-H.
Gao
,
W.
Theiss
,
Y.-Q.
Shen
,
P.-J.
Ma
, and
G.
Liu
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
167
,
150
(
2017
).
170.
X.-L.
Qiu
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
C.-Y.
He
, and
G.
Liu
,
Infrared Phys. Technol.
109
,
103407
(
2020
).
171.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
X.-L.
Qiu
,
H.-X.
Guo
, and
G.
Liu
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
9
(
10
),
6413
6422
(
2021
).
172.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
S.-S.
Zhao
, and
G.
Liu
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
13
(
14
),
16987
(
2021
).
173.
C.-Y.
He
,
X.
Zhang
,
D.-M.
Yu
,
S.-S.
Zhao
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
4
(
9
),
8801
(
2021
).
174.
C.-Y.
He
,
P.
Zhao
,
X.-H.
Gao
,
G.
Liu
, and
P.-Q.
La
,
Mater. Today Phys.
27
,
100836
(
2022
).
175.
L.
Xing
,
Y.
Ha
,
R.
Wang
, and
Z.
Li
,
Sol. Energy
262
,
111858
(
2023
).
176.
H.
Kang
,
J. T.
Buchman
,
R. S.
Rodriguez
,
H. L.
Ring
,
J.
He
,
K. C.
Bantz
, and
C. L.
Haynes
,
Chem. Rev.
119
(
1
),
664
(
2019
).
177.
L.
Yang
,
G. H.
Li
, and
L. D.
Zhang
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
76
(
12
),
1537
(
2000
).
178.
S.
Kim
,
J.-M.
Kim
,
J.-E.
Park
, and
J.-M.
Nam
,
Adv. Mater.
30
(
42
),
1704528
(
2018
).
179.
W.
Li
,
U.
Guler
,
N.
Kinsey
,
G. V.
Naik
,
A.
Boltasseva
,
J.
Guan
,
V. M.
Shalaev
, and
A. V.
Kildishev
,
Adv. Mater.
26
(
47
),
7959
(
2014
).
180.
A. N.
Grigorenko
,
M.
Polini
, and
K. S.
Novoselov
,
Nat. Photonics
6
(
11
),
749
(
2012
).
181.
Y.
Tian
,
X.
Liu
,
A.
Caratenuto
,
J.
Li
,
S.
Zhou
,
R.
Ran
,
F.
Chen
,
Z.
Wang
,
K.-t.
Wan
,
G.
Xiao
, and
Y.
Zheng
,
Nano Energy
92
,
106717
(
2022
).
182.
X.
Liu
,
P.
Zhao
,
C.-Y.
He
,
W.-M.
Wang
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
Z.-W.
Lu
,
Y.-F.
Wang
,
H.-X.
Guo
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
14
(
44
),
50180
50189
(
2022
).
183.
J. C. C.
Fan
,
F. J.
Bachner
,
G. H.
Foley
, and
P. M.
Zavracky
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
25
(
12
),
693
(
1974
).
184.
J.
Wang
,
D.
Petit
, and
S.
Ren
,
Nanoscale Adv.
2
(
12
),
5504
(
2020
).
185.
A. A.
Günay
,
H.
Kim
,
N.
Nagarajan
,
M.
Lopez
,
R.
Kantharaj
,
A.
Alsaati
,
A.
Marconnet
,
A.
Lenert
, and
N.
Miljkovic
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
15
),
12603
12611
(
2018
).
186.
L.
Zhao
,
B.
Bhatia
,
S.
Yang
,
E.
Strobach
,
L. A.
Weinstein
,
T. A.
Cooper
,
G.
Chen
, and
E. N.
Wang
,
ACS Nano
13
(
7
),
7508
7516
(
2019
).
187.
B.
Liu
,
C.
He
,
Y.
Li
,
Z.
Li
,
W.
Wang
,
Z.
Lu
,
Z.
Wang
,
S.
Zhao
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.
Gao
,
Matter
7
(
1
),
140
(
2024
).
188.
H.-X.
Guo
,
T.-J.
Li
,
S.
Ai
,
C.-Y.
He
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
Z.-W.
Lu
,
W.-M.
Wang
,
M.-M.
Liu
,
X.-T.
Wang
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
619
,
156728
(
2023
).
189.
H.
Luo
,
Q.
Li
,
K.
Du
,
Z.
Xu
,
H.
Zhu
,
D.
Liu
,
L.
Cai
,
P.
Ghosh
, and
M.
Qiu
,
Nano Energy
65
,
103998
(
2019
).
190.
Y.
Li
,
J.
Hao
,
H.
Song
,
F.
Zhang
,
X.
Bai
,
X.
Meng
,
H.
Zhang
,
S.
Wang
,
Y.
Hu
, and
J.
Ye
,
Nat. Commun.
10
(
1
),
2359
(
2019
).
191.
Y.
Li
,
W.
Ma
,
Y. S.
Kwon
,
W.
Li
,
S.
Yao
, and
B.
Huang
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
32
(
25
),
2113297
(
2022
).
192.
Md. T.
Islam
,
N.
Huda
,
A. B.
Abdullah
, and
R.
Saidur
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
91
,
987
(
2018
).
193.
M. J.
Blanco
and
S.
Miller
,
Advances in Concentrating Solar Thermal Research and Technology
, edited by
M. J.
Blanco
and
L. R.
Santigosa
(
Woodhead Publishing
,
2017
), p.
3
.
194.
N.
Angliviel de La Beaumelle
,
K.
Blok
,
J. A.
de Chalendar
,
L.
Clarke
,
A. N.
Hahmann
,
J.
Huster
,
G. F.
Nemet
,
D.
Suri
,
T. B.
Wild
, and
I. M. L.
Azevedo
,
Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.
48
(
1
),
419
(
2023
).
195.
A.
Soum-Glaude
,
A.
Le Gal
,
M.
Bichotte
,
C.
Escape
, and
L.
Dubost
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
170
,
254
(
2017
).
196.
P.
Li
, et al,
Adv. Mater.
27
(
31
),
4585
4591
(
2015
).
197.
J.-p.
Meng
,
R.-r.
Guo
,
H.
Li
,
L.-m.
Zhao
,
X.-p.
Liu
, and
Z.
Li
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
440
,
932
(
2018
).
198.
K.
Valleti
,
S. G.
Rao
,
P.
Miryalkar
,
A.
Sandeep
, and
D. S.
Rao
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
215
,
110634
(
2020
).
199.
B.
Sun
,
J.
Ren
,
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Sun
,
J.
Cui
,
D.
Liang
,
H.
Liu
,
Y.
Yang
,
A.
Li
, and
C.
Wang
,
Mater. Today Sustainability
24
,
100518
(
2023
).
200.
G. J.
Snyder
and
E. S.
Toberer
,
Nat. Mater.
7
(
2
),
105
(
2008
).
201.
S.
Lv
,
W.
He
,
Z.
Hu
,
M.
Liu
,
M.
Qin
,
S.
Shen
, and
W.
Gong
,
Energy Convers. Manage.
196
,
69
(
2019
).
202.
L. L.
Baranowski
,
G. J.
Snyder
, and
E. S.
Toberer
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
5
(
10
),
9055
(
2012
).
203.
M.
Telkes
,
J. Appl. Phys.
25
(
6
),
765
(
1954
).
204.
D.
Jiang
,
Z.
Fan
,
M.
Dong
,
Y.
Shang
,
X.
Liu
,
G.
Chen
, and
S.
Li
,
Appl. Therm. Eng.
141
,
828
(
2018
).
205.
D.
Kraemer
,
Q.
Jie
,
K.
McEnaney
,
F.
Cao
,
W.
Liu
,
L. A.
Weinstein
,
J.
Loomis
,
Z.
Ren
, and
G.
Chen
,
Nat. Energy
1
(
11
),
16153
(
2016
).
206.
Z.
Wu
,
S.
Zhang
,
Z.
Liu
,
E.
Mu
, and
Z.
Hu
,
Nano Energy
91
,
106692
(
2022
).
207.
Z.
Chen
,
L.
Zhu
,
W.
Li
, and
S.
Fan
,
Joule
3
(
1
),
101
(
2019
).
208.
M.
Feng
,
S.
Lv
,
J.
Deng
,
Y.
Guo
,
Y.
Wu
,
G.
Shi
, and
M.
Zhang
,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
187
,
113723
(
2023
).
209.
Q.
Yue
,
L.
Zhang
,
C.-Y.
He
,
B.-H.
Liu
,
W.-M.
Wang
,
Z.-W.
Lu
,
G.
Liu
, and
X.-H.
Gao
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
11
(
6
),
3126
(
2023
).
210.
B.
Zhao
,
G.
Pei
, and
A. P.
Raman
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
117
(
16
),
163903
(
2020
).
211.
M.
Hu
,
B.
Zhao
,
X.
Ao
,
X.
Ren
,
J.
Cao
,
Q.
Wang
,
Y.
Su
, and
G.
Pei
,
Appl. Energy
260
,
114167
(
2020
).
212.
W.
Li
,
S.
Buddhiraju
, and
S.
Fan
,
Light: Sci. Appl.
9
(
1
),
68
(
2020
).
213.
S.
Zhang
,
Z.
Wu
,
Z.
Liu
,
E.
Mu
,
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Lv
,
T.
Thundat
, and
Z.
Hu
,
Adv. Mater. Technol.
7
(
12
),
2200478
(
2022
).
214.
S.
Zhang
,
Z.
Wu
,
Z.
Liu
, and
Z.
Hu
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
13
(
19
),
2300260
(
2023
).
215.
L.
Yu
,
Z.
Xi
,
S.
Li
,
D.
Pang
,
H.
Yan
, and
M.
Chen
,
Appl. Energy
322
,
119403
(
2022
).