Metamaterials serve as versatile platforms for demonstrating condensed matter physics and non-equilibrium phenomena, with electrical circuits emerging as a particularly compelling medium. This review highlights recent advances in the experimental circuit realizations of topological, non-Hermitian, non-linear, Floquet, and other notable phenomena. Initially performed mostly with passive electrical components, topolectrical circuits have evolved to incorporate active elements such as operational amplifiers and analog multipliers that combine to form negative impedance converters, complex phase elements, high-frequency temporal modulators, and self-feedback mechanisms. This review provides a summary of these contemporary studies and discusses the broader potential of electrical circuits in physics.

The use of electrical circuit metamaterial arrays to simulate condensed matter phenomena has emerged as a popular approach alongside other metamaterial approaches,1 such as mechanical,2–4 acoustical,5–10 and photonic11–13 media. Numerous studies, some of which are reviewed in this article, have demonstrated that a wide range of condensed matter phenomena can be experimentally realized through the design of appropriate electrical circuits. The use of electrical circuit arrays to study the resistance or conductance between the farthest points of a lattice continuum has a long history in condensed matter circles14–19 and has been studied through various approaches, such as lattice Green’s function,20,21 transfer matrix method,22 recursion–transform approach,23 and method of images.24 However, the formal connection between the Hamiltonian formalism and the circuit Laplacian was established less than a decade ago. Early work on periodic circuit lattices primarily addressed point-to-point resistance or impedance problems, lacking a comprehensive methodological framework that connect with condensed matter models.

One of the first studies that introduced a systematic approach to this was the paper by Lee et al. in 2018,25 which introduced a systematic approach that formalized the concept of topolectrical (TE) circuits. It is inspired by two earlier studies by Ningyuan et al.26 and Albert et al.27 that provided explicit constructions of circuit lattices exhibiting topological properties.28–38 Following these foundational studies, there has been a rapid proliferation of follow-up studies, both through circuit simulations39–44 and experimental implementations45–53 (many more to be reviewed later).

Early studies primarily focused on demonstrating topological phenomena,54–60 including the realization of edge,52,61,62 higher-order corner,63–67 surface68 and hinge states,69 and semi-metalic phases of Weyl51,70–72 or Dirac semi-metals,73,74 in multi-dimensional lattices or heterogeneous systems.75,76 Soon after, these efforts expanded to encompass non-Hermitian77–80 and non-linear81–83 systems, as well as simulators of non-Abelian operators84,85 and quantum gates86,87 and various other applications.88–94 At this stage, it is clear that implementing various physical phenomena in electrical circuits has become an engineering task, provided the theoretical framework is validated through the theoretical circuit analysis and circuit simulations.

As such, the focus has recently shifted to the direct device applications of physical models realized by electrical circuits, moving beyond their role as proof-of-concept demonstrations, and the integration of active analog signal processing devices. For the former focus, numerous studies have already proposed sensing applications based on electrical circuits.95–97 Many of these circuit designs hold promise for practical use, as they can be manufactured using integrated circuit (IC) technologies, enabling their incorporation into everyday technological devices.98,99 For instance, a sensitive boundary-dependent response can be achieved using simple RLC components, thanks to the non-local impedance response of passive electrical circuit components.100 The latter focus involves the manipulation of signals using devices such as analog multipliers, operational amplifiers (op-amps), and transistors. While op-amps are commonly used to realize non-reciprocal couplings in impedance conversion configurations,40,46 their potential extends far beyond these applications. Circuit configurations involving multiple op-amps and analog multipliers enable to realize numerous phenomena such as Floquet engineering of lattice models,101,102 time-varying couplings,103 or tunable interaction strength.104,105 One illustrative example is the realization of complex coupling terms using analog multipliers, where four multipliers are configured appropriately to achieve the desired effect.106 

In the following, we highlight some of the draws of using TE circuits.

  • Abundant resources: since electrical circuits are ubiquitous and well-established, a wealth of resources, ranging from educational to research materials, is readily available in the literature, along with a variety of simulation tools, such as LTspice,107 PSpice,108 Multisim,109 or Modelithics Library.110 The widespread availability of circuit components ensures that the necessary elements are easily accessible. Moreover, these resources are cost-effective, making them suitable for diverse implementations.

  • Linearity and independence from physical embedding: linear circuits can be analyzed using nodal analysis, where each connection at a node represents an additional degree of freedom, analogous to spatial dimensions in physical systems. The wave interactions in these circuits are governed by the principle of linear superposition, allowing the simultaneous synthesis of multiple voltage or current waveforms at a node.111–113 Unlike most other metamaterial arrays where propagation direction is constrained by physical geometry, circuits provide the flexibility to emulate systems with higher dimensionalities.50,114 This capability enables the synthetic realization of effective dimensions that transcend physical constraints, offering a unique advantage over many other platforms.

  • Straightforward local adjustments and tunability: localized modifications, such as defect engineering,115 are straightforward and adaptable. The interconnectness of electrical lattices ensures accessibility to each node, enabling precise local tuning or perturbation.116–118 This offers a significant advantage over less modular setups, where specific localized perturbations are not always possible due to fabrication limitations or intrinsic material properties.

  • High reliability and precision: well-designed and maintained electrical circuits provide high reliability, even under challenging environmental conditions.119 They are resilient and do not require special operating environments, such as low temperatures or special electromagnetic shielding,120 making them versatile for various applications.121,122

  • Scalability and accessibility: scalability is a major challenge in many metamaterial implementations. Electrical circuits offer high scalability compared to other platforms, which often rely on specialized materials or complex manufacturing techniques,123,124 making scaling up and system modifications more challenging. In addition, impurities in electrical circuits are typically localized, meaning they do not lead to cumulative effects that cause significant overall systems.

  • Ease of implementing non-Hermiticity: electrical circuits are intrinsically suitable for the realization of non-Hermitian models, which require non-reciprocal couplings or controlled loss125 and gain.126 Active components, such as op-amps, allow the direct implementation of highly linear non-reciprocal non-Hermiticity,77 and loss is naturally present in resistive components.127 

  • Precise control of component uncertainties and loss: that said, many circuit component manufacturers provide a wide variety of high-quality components with minimal deviations in component parameters and loss. In addition, for implementations that demand exceptionally low loss and deviation, it is feasible to preselect circuit elements due to their generally low cost, as a variety of low-loss components can be readily found to meet these stringent requirements.

  • Direct observability and measurability: impedance measurements allow key band structure features, such as non-trivial topological zero modes, to be directly observed through straightforward profiling.45 Such measurements can either measure the local transmissibility or the global, non-site-specific band structure properties.128 

In addition to these advantages, electrical circuits possess the following set of advantages that are collectively elusive in other platforms.
  • Ease of implementing synthetic dimensions: independence from physical geometric embedding allows the realization of lattice models in arbitrarily many synthetic dimensions, overcoming physical and spatial limitations.50,114,129,130

  • Broad frequency range compatibility: electrical circuits can operate across a wide frequency spectrum, from a few hertz to a few gigahertz.131–133 Unlike photonic systems, which typically require microwave frequencies or higher,134 electrical circuits can function efficiently at much lower AC frequencies (e.g., even a few hundred hertz), making them suitable for studying topological oscillations at timescales amenable to direct human observation. Similarly, while acoustic systems often face challenges in achieving realizations in the ultrasound range (above 20 kHz),6 integrated circuits can even extend their operation into the terahertz (THz) regime.135 

  • Real-time reconfigurability: the modular nature of circuit components, such as varactors and digitally controlled amplifiers or analog multipliers, enables real-time localized adjustments.102 This capability is crucial for tasks requiring the dynamic modulation of specific couplings without needing to reconstruct the setup, particularly the simulation of Floquet media.101–103,132,136

  • Convenience in combining linear and non-linear components: electrical circuits provide a diverse range of linear components (such as resistors, capacitors, and inductors) and non-linear components (such as diodes, transistors, and non-linear amplifiers) that can be combined seamlessly. This versatility enables the study and realization of both linear and non-linear phenomena within the same platform.82,137 In contrast, photonic and acoustical systems often require specialized materials to achieve non-linearity, making such juxtapositions more challenging.138,139

Although some of these advantages may be even more prominent in certain platforms, i.e., strong intrinsic optical non-linearity in non-linear photonics,140–144 electrical circuits remain a highly suitable medium for realizing a broad range of phenomena, as outlined above. In general, their versatility and practicality make them an excellent choice for many applications.

Many of the features listed above have already been effectively exploited in existing topolectrical circuit experiments.145,146 Building upon these advantages, it can be anticipated that the field is moving toward real-world applications of the phenomena investigated. Early attempts, such as sensing device implementations based on topological non-Hermitian phenomena,147 hint at the potential for further advancements.97,148 In addition, the use of analog multipliers to realize complex couplings or temporal responses101 herald a new era when phenomena far beyond topology are realized with chip technologies that are integrated into TE circuits.133,149,150

We present a concise review of the fundamentals of TE circuits, focusing on the Laplacian formalism and their impedance characteristics.

In electric circuit settings, both the Laplacian and Hamiltonian are frequently used. While both are used to describe aspects of the circuit dynamics, they are fundamentally different objects. The circuit Laplacian captures the graph connectivity structure of the circuit by representing the flow of the current in an electrical circuit through Kirchhoff’s law. By contrast, the Hamiltonian is formally defined as the generator of time evolution, as in Schrödinger’s equation. In the following, we examine how the Laplacian and Hamiltonian are related, particularly in the context of topolectrical circuit arrays,25 where both acquire a momentum-space band description.

For any electrical circuit, the steady-state circuit Laplacian is given by
(1)
where V represents the vector of node voltages and I denotes the input current vector. The components of each vector are the voltages and current at each node. For instance, in a capacitive topological Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH)151 circuit shown in Fig. 1(a), the circuit Laplacian is expressed as
(2)
where A and B are the sub-lattice nodes in a unit cell n; w1, w2 represent the admittances of the circuit node connections; and β = w1 + w2 + wg, with wg denoting the admittance of the grounding components. For example, in the SSH circuit with inter-cell and intra-cell capacitances C1 and C2, and grounding inductance L, the admittances are w1 = iωC1, w2 = iωC2, and wg = 1/(iωL), where ω = 2πf and f is the frequency of the driving signal. While these coupled equations also occur in the commonly known SSH model Hamiltonian, capturing the hoppings between sub-lattice nodes A and B within each unit cell n, we emphasize its distinction to the Hamiltonian describing electrical circuits, as described in the following.
FIG. 1.

Impedance resonances in topolectrical circuits. (a) The SSH topolectrical circuit consists of capacitors of alternating sizes and on-site inductors, forming a one-dimensional chain with two sites per unit cell.25 (b) Dramatic impedance peaks of the SSH circuit in panel (a) are observed only in the topologically nontrivial (t < 1) case, not the trivial (t > 1) case.25 [(a) and (b) adapted with permission from Lee et al., Commun. Phys. 1, 39 (2018). Copyright 2018 Authors, licensed under a CC BY 4.0.] (c) Edge-to-edge or corner-to-corner impedance across a bounded circuit array can be analytically determined using the method of images, which involves infinite periodic tiling of the physical circuit (red shaded) and symmetrically placed current injection (cyan dots) and extraction (orange dots) that makes the physical circuit boundaries equipotentials.21,24,152 (d) The method of images can be applied to more generic lattices and geometries too, such as the honeycomb lattice with ribbon geometry.152 (e) In heterogeneous circuits with more than one type of elements that give rise to opposite phases, i.e., capacitors and inductors, dramatic impedance peaks can occur at special system sizes where one term in the denominator of Eq. (10) nearly vanishes.153 (f) As revealed in Ref. 153, the origin of these abrupt size-dependent resonances can be traced to the fractal-like patterns of the impedance density plot in the parameter space of system size and one of the circuit parameters, such as the AC frequency ω. Resonances arising from the topological zero modes can also appear, although they generally do not scale with system size, as illustrated in the bottom diagram. [(c)–(f) adapted with permission from Sahin et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 245114 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (g) The experiment in Ref. 153 demonstrates the robustness of these size-dependent peaks against parasitic resistance in a two-dimensional LC circuit. [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 151 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (h) The one-dimensional chiral symmetric Fibonacci topolectrical circuit, exhibiting a fractal energy spectrum in the thermodynamic limit, is built to demonstrate how the circuit Laplacian spectrum can be obtained directly from impedance measurements.128 (i) The peak frequencies (green dots) of the measured impedance between a bulk node and an edge node (blue line) in Ref. 128 can be accurately identified by applying noise filters, such as the Butterworth filter and the second derivative method. (j) As demonstrated in Ref. 128, the circuit spectrum E can be directly recovered from a single frequency-resolved impedance measurement through the use of signal processing techniques such as the matrix pencil method. [(h)–(j) adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 151 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

FIG. 1.

Impedance resonances in topolectrical circuits. (a) The SSH topolectrical circuit consists of capacitors of alternating sizes and on-site inductors, forming a one-dimensional chain with two sites per unit cell.25 (b) Dramatic impedance peaks of the SSH circuit in panel (a) are observed only in the topologically nontrivial (t < 1) case, not the trivial (t > 1) case.25 [(a) and (b) adapted with permission from Lee et al., Commun. Phys. 1, 39 (2018). Copyright 2018 Authors, licensed under a CC BY 4.0.] (c) Edge-to-edge or corner-to-corner impedance across a bounded circuit array can be analytically determined using the method of images, which involves infinite periodic tiling of the physical circuit (red shaded) and symmetrically placed current injection (cyan dots) and extraction (orange dots) that makes the physical circuit boundaries equipotentials.21,24,152 (d) The method of images can be applied to more generic lattices and geometries too, such as the honeycomb lattice with ribbon geometry.152 (e) In heterogeneous circuits with more than one type of elements that give rise to opposite phases, i.e., capacitors and inductors, dramatic impedance peaks can occur at special system sizes where one term in the denominator of Eq. (10) nearly vanishes.153 (f) As revealed in Ref. 153, the origin of these abrupt size-dependent resonances can be traced to the fractal-like patterns of the impedance density plot in the parameter space of system size and one of the circuit parameters, such as the AC frequency ω. Resonances arising from the topological zero modes can also appear, although they generally do not scale with system size, as illustrated in the bottom diagram. [(c)–(f) adapted with permission from Sahin et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 245114 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (g) The experiment in Ref. 153 demonstrates the robustness of these size-dependent peaks against parasitic resistance in a two-dimensional LC circuit. [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 151 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (h) The one-dimensional chiral symmetric Fibonacci topolectrical circuit, exhibiting a fractal energy spectrum in the thermodynamic limit, is built to demonstrate how the circuit Laplacian spectrum can be obtained directly from impedance measurements.128 (i) The peak frequencies (green dots) of the measured impedance between a bulk node and an edge node (blue line) in Ref. 128 can be accurately identified by applying noise filters, such as the Butterworth filter and the second derivative method. (j) As demonstrated in Ref. 128, the circuit spectrum E can be directly recovered from a single frequency-resolved impedance measurement through the use of signal processing techniques such as the matrix pencil method. [(h)–(j) adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 151 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

Close modal
In general, the equation of motion in a circuit setting can be expressed as
(3)
where the dot and double dot denote the first and second derivatives with respect to time t, respectively. The matrices L, U, and C encode the inductance, conductance, and capacitance from the circuit components, respectively, and collectively define the grounded circuit Laplacian as J=U+iωC+1iωL. At the resonant frequency, where nonzero voltage signals V can be sustained without input current, this circuit Laplacian defines the Hamiltonian. With no external input current [I(t) = 0], the circuit dynamics are determined by the homogeneous solutions to Eq. (3). To reduce this second-order equation to a first-order system, we define independent variables ψ1(t)=V̇(t) and ψ2(t) = V(t) and construct the state vector accordingly,
(4)
and rewrite Eq. (3) as
(5)
We can now describe the system with a first-order differential equation for ψ(t),
(6)
where I is the N × N identity matrix, where N denotes the circuit size. Hence, the system dynamics have been reformulated as iddtψ(t)=Hψ(t), where the Hamiltonian is just the block matrix,
(7)
This H, which is a 2N × 2N block matrix, captures the dynamics of the circuit. The eigenvalues of H correspond to the system’s resonant frequencies, while its eigenvectors describe the (equivalent) spatial and temporal voltage distributions at resonance. H governs the temporal evolution of the circuit represented by the Laplacian J. Thus, the steady-state behavior and the time-dependent dynamics of the circuit can be analyzed using Eqs. (1) and (7), respectively.
The impedance is a fundamental measurable quantity that relates the circuit’s response to a given excitation. The two-point impedance19,154,155 between nodes i and j is defined as
(8)
which can also be expressed in terms of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Laplacian as17,18,25,156,157
(9)
where λk and ψk are the kth eigenvalue and eigenvector of the Laplacian, respectively, and |…| denotes the biorthogonal norm. In the presence of a zero mode, which can exist due to symmetry or topological protection, the impedance would peak. For instance, for the topolectrical circuit realization of the SSH model25 [Fig. 1(a)], the impedance between two edges exhibits a peak in the topological regime where there exists a λk ≈ 0 [black in Fig. 1(b)], but no resonance peak is observed in the trivial phase [red in Fig. 1(b)]. While the two-point impedance typically needs to be computed numerically through Eqs. (8) and (9), analytical results exists for special scenarios, which can be handled through lattice Green’s functions,17,158 recursion-transform methods,159 transfer matrix methods,160 or, for sufficiently symmetric boundary terminations, the method of images.152 

1. Method of images for bounded circuit arrays

A significant obstacle in obtaining impedance results analytically lies in the implementation of open boundary conditions (OBCs), particularly for unit cells with multiple nodes. However, recent developments have demonstrated that the method of images can successfully yield analytical expressions for a wide range of OBC scenarios, for instance, 2D SSH circuits with four nodes per unit cell. The core idea involves tiling the space periodically with infinite copies of the actual lattice, such that the open boundary becomes an equipotential where no current flows through anyway. As illustrated in Fig. 1(c), symmetrically injecting current at the center nodes and extracting it from the intended boundaries converts the edges of the pink region into impenetrable equipotentials, such that the OBC problem can be treated as an infinite image current problem.

Care has to be taken to design a symmetric manner for current injection and extraction, such that neighboring nodes along the intended boundaries have the same voltage potential. This prevents current from leaking through the physical circuit’s boundaries. This method of images can be performed to induce open boundaries in a variety of lattice geometries, such as the honeycomb lattice [Fig. 1(d)].152 In the same work, a general analytical expression was derived for the corner-to-corner impedance of a D-dimensional circuit with ND unit cells. For a single node per unit cell, the size N-dependent impedance Z(N) is given by
(10)
where wi is the admittance of the nearest-neighbor unit cell coupling along each direction, and k=i=1Dkiai, with ki=niπN and ni ∈ {1, 2, …, 2N}, where i = (1, 2, , D). Here, the sum is taken for ni up to 2N, not N, because of the doubling of the system to account for the image nodes. wgnd is the admittance of the uniform grounding connection from each node, introduced such as to provide an offset in the denominator. The asterisk sign (*) on the summation operator indicates that the impedance computation must be performed for only odd values of (n1 + n2 + ⋯ + nD).

Importantly, Z(N) can be extraordinarily large for certain some values of certain circuit sizes N if there are circuit coupling elements that introduce opposite phases, i.e., capacitors and inductors [Fig. 1(e)]. This is because having at least two different wi of opposite signs can allow the denominator to almost vanish at appropriate values of N. Such dramatic system size dependence in the impedance is not seen in homogeneous electrical media, where the dependence on N is smooth (logarithmic or power-law).17,161–163

Behind the seemingly erratic occurrence of impedance peaks in Fig. 1(e) is a sophisticated fractal-like pattern in the distribution of resonance heights within the parameter space of system size N and ω—the dimensionless (normalized) frequency characterized by the LC components [Fig. 1(f)]. While the detailed pattern depends on the actual lattice model describing the circuit array, hierarchies of impedance peaks universally occur in a qualitatively similar manner. The intricacy of this pattern arises from the commensurability properties of the denominator in Eq. (10), in which some values of N can cause it to be especially close to vanishing [Fig. 1(g)]. Notably, there exists some branches that are particularly robust and hence experimentally detectable,153 reminiscent of the more salient structures in the Hofstadter butterfly. In addition, resonances may also arise due to protected topological zero modes, as in a Chern lattice [bottom diagram in Fig. 1(f)].

The Laplacian eigenspectrum can be obtained either by reconstructing the Laplacian matrix and then diagonalizing it, or by directly measuring the impedance resonances.

1. Through circuit Laplacian reconstruction

In the former, one can perform N2 impedance measurements by separately subjecting the circuit to N different input current configurations and measuring the electrical potentials at all the N nodes.77,164–167 This yields N different current and voltage vectors, which can be written as N × N matrices I and V. This allows the Laplacian J to be recovered via J = IV−1; for simplicity, one can just ground the circuit and choose to input the current at one node at a time, such that I is simply the identity matrix.

This is demonstrated in the work of Helbig et al.,46 where the eigenvalue band structure of a 1D non-Hermitian SSH circuit under both open and periodic boundary conditions (OBCs and PBCs) was measured. By varying the injected signal frequency and measuring voltage responses, they extracted the system’s eigenvalue spectrum as a function of the driving frequency. For PBCs, translational symmetry reduces the independent degrees of freedom from N2 to N, since it allows the spectrum to be computed in momentum space by exciting the nodes and Fourier transforming the measured node voltages.115,168 However, OBC circuits require real-space voltage measurements across the entire array, yielding, for instance, additional spatially localized edge modes. Helbig et al.39 first presented this framework, with a further implementation in a 2D topological Chern circuit by Hofmann et al.40 

2. Through direct circuit resonance measurement

Constructing the circuit Laplacian in full requires N2 impedance measurements, in general, and that presents practical limitations in larger circuits. Recently, Franca et al.128 developed a method to extract the Laplacian eigenenergies directly from impedance resonances using much fewer measurement configurations. As deduced from Eq. (9), any vanishing eigenvalue corresponds to a large impedance resonance. By tuning the system across a range of AC frequencies, various resonances can be observed, as demonstrated with high accuracy in their Fibonacci circuit implementation [Fig. 1(h)]. This approach bypasses the need for constructing the circuit Laplacian, reducing the measurement complexity from N2 measurements to a single impedance measurement at various (easily tunable) frequencies.

To elaborate, this approach involves examining the second derivative of the impedance profile with respect to frequency, coupled with a fourth-order Butterworth filter to mitigate noise [Fig. 1(i)]. Advanced data processing techniques, such as the matrix pencil method and utilizing the symmetric energy profiles of chiral symmetric systems, further enhance the precision in determining admittance eigenvalues. In a similar spirit as other studies that utilize machine learning to infer the spectrum from limited measurements (to be discussed in subsequent sections, e.g., Ref. 169), this method represents a significant advance, which allows for the measurement of the Laplacian spectrum from a single measurement [Fig. 1(j)].

In the following, we highlight various studies, mostly experimental, on demonstrating non-Hermitian phenomena of contemporary interest. Emphasis is placed on recent developments in the past few years.

1. Exceptional points in parity-time symmetric setups

Parity-time (PT) symmetry can protect the reality of eigenvalues even if the operator, i.e., circuit Laplacian or Hamiltonian is non-Hermitian.170–175 A typical PT-symmetric 2-level Hamiltonian is represented as
(11)
where ± γ are the gain and loss terms, ω is the natural frequency of both subsystems, and κ is their coupling strength. In linear electrical circuits, the most common operator of interest would be the circuit Laplacian instead of the Hamiltonian.

The eigenvalues of HPT are given by E=ω±κ2γ2. When κ > γ, the eigenvalues are real, indicating the PT-symmetric phase. Conversely, when κ < γ, the eigenvalues become complex, signaling a transition to the broken PT-symmetric phase. At the critical point κ = γ, not only do the eigenvalues coincide, but the eigenvectors also coalesce (become parallel to each other). Such non-Hermitian critical points are known as exceptional points (EPs),174,176–182 which are special because the eigenspace is defective, i.e., not full rank. Furthermore, due to the square-root singularity of the eigenbands at the EP, the spectrum becomes highly sensitive to perturbations, with a divergent gradient as the EP is approached. This sensitivity increases for higher-order exceptional points, where n > 2 eigenvalues coincide and result in a E1/n singularity. That the system’s response to perturbations becomes increasingly pronounced is particularly advantageous for sensing applications.183,184 The sensitivity can be enhanced by incorporating multiple modes or alternative coupling mechanisms to enable higher-order EPs.182,185–190 Beyond isolated EPs, higher dimensional extensions such as exceptional lines191 and exceptional rings192 have also been observed, in analogy to nodal lines and rings.193–198 

One of the earlier experimental realizations of a PT-symmetric circuit was performed by Schindler et al.,199 where two LC oscillators—one with gain (achieved using an operational amplifier) and the other with loss (introduced by a resistor)—were coupled [Fig. 2(a1)]. These systems demonstrate the square-root branching behavior that leads to the bifurcation of both the real and imaginary parts of the eigenfrequency at the EPs [Fig. 2(a2)].

FIG. 2.

Parity-time (PT) symmetric two-component systems and their circuit realizations. (a) An early demonstration of a parity-time symmetric RLC circuit (a1) exhibiting a complex branch point, i.e., EP (a2) in the frequency spectrum, as the mutual coupling between two inductors is tuned.199 [Adapted with permission from Schindler et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 040101(R) (2011). Copyright 2011 American Physical Society.] (b) An integrated circuit realization of a PT-symmetric two-component system that demonstrates sensitivity to coupling capacitance, as seen in the 0.35 GHz band isolation corresponding to peak splitting in the frequency domain (b3).200 [Adapted with permission from Cao et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 262–268 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Implementation of such two-component systems as microsensors, with wireless systems locked to an exceptional point (EP). The EP-locked setting (red in c3) shows superior sensitivity compared to the conventional diabolic point response (DP limit shown in blue in c3).201 [Adapted with permission from Dong et al., Nat. Electron. 2, 335–342 (2019). Copyright 2019 Springer Nature.] (d) Enhanced sensitivity at the EP from introducing non-linearity. Such non-linear EPs (NEPs) (d2) enjoy greater noise resilience (d3 and d4) due to the restoration of a complete eigenstate due to the non-linearity.202 [Adapted with permission from Bai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 073802 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (e) PT-symmetric systems can enhance stability in the transient domain beyond their sensitive response. In the presence of transient PT symmetry, unwanted oscillations (red in e3) can be eliminated in fast-switching devices. The vanishing peak around 36 MHz in e4 indicates the suppression of unwanted oscillations.203 [Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 065701 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society.] (f) Higher-order EPs underlie braiding in the complex eigenvalue plane. The spectra of the two-node (f2) and three-node (f3) circuits exhibit two-band and three-band twistings hosting three EPs.204 [Adapted with permission from Cao et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 165128 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.]

FIG. 2.

Parity-time (PT) symmetric two-component systems and their circuit realizations. (a) An early demonstration of a parity-time symmetric RLC circuit (a1) exhibiting a complex branch point, i.e., EP (a2) in the frequency spectrum, as the mutual coupling between two inductors is tuned.199 [Adapted with permission from Schindler et al., Phys. Rev. A 84, 040101(R) (2011). Copyright 2011 American Physical Society.] (b) An integrated circuit realization of a PT-symmetric two-component system that demonstrates sensitivity to coupling capacitance, as seen in the 0.35 GHz band isolation corresponding to peak splitting in the frequency domain (b3).200 [Adapted with permission from Cao et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 262–268 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Implementation of such two-component systems as microsensors, with wireless systems locked to an exceptional point (EP). The EP-locked setting (red in c3) shows superior sensitivity compared to the conventional diabolic point response (DP limit shown in blue in c3).201 [Adapted with permission from Dong et al., Nat. Electron. 2, 335–342 (2019). Copyright 2019 Springer Nature.] (d) Enhanced sensitivity at the EP from introducing non-linearity. Such non-linear EPs (NEPs) (d2) enjoy greater noise resilience (d3 and d4) due to the restoration of a complete eigenstate due to the non-linearity.202 [Adapted with permission from Bai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 073802 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (e) PT-symmetric systems can enhance stability in the transient domain beyond their sensitive response. In the presence of transient PT symmetry, unwanted oscillations (red in e3) can be eliminated in fast-switching devices. The vanishing peak around 36 MHz in e4 indicates the suppression of unwanted oscillations.203 [Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 065701 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society.] (f) Higher-order EPs underlie braiding in the complex eigenvalue plane. The spectra of the two-node (f2) and three-node (f3) circuits exhibit two-band and three-band twistings hosting three EPs.204 [Adapted with permission from Cao et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 165128 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.]

Close modal

Integrated circuit implementations of PT-symmetric systems are particularly technologically promising, as they operate at high microwave frequencies and offer scalability. For instance, Cao et al.200 designed a fully integrated PT-symmetric two-component system [Fig. 2(b1)] where the oscillatory mode exhibits wideband microwave generation with significantly reduced noise aided by the PT-symmetric phase transition [Fig. 2(b2)]. The splitting of resonance peaks in different phases achieved a 0.35 GHz band isolation [Fig. 2(b3)], showcasing the exceptional sensitivity and practical utility of integrated circuit-based PT-symmetric systems.

Wireless electronic sensors205 primarily utilize the resonant behavior of LC circuits [Fig. 2(c1)], and enhancing their sensitivity can lead to promising applications such as wireless power transfer.206 In addition, implanted LC wireless circuits can monitor biological functions in living organisms [Fig. 2(c2)]. By leveraging on the highly sensitive readout of their microsensor implanted in vivo, Dong et al.201 successfully measured physiological functions such as breathing rate, demonstrating superior sensitivity compared to standard LC sensory readers [Fig. 2(c3)].

Although an EP system becomes highly responsive at the EP, the accompanying defective eigenspace (where two or more eigenvectors coalesce) can also introduce undesirable susceptibility to noise,207 complicating the implementation of EP-based sensors.177 However, appropriately designed non-linearity can mitigate that susceptibility while preserving the responsiveness, even leading to EP transitions.208,209 Bai et al.202 designed a two-component circuit that juxtaposes the non-linearity and non-Hermitian coupling between two oscillators [Fig. 2(d1)]. Introducing non-linear gain results in higher-order non-linear EPs (NEPs), such as third-order NEPs, as shown in Fig. 2(d2). They effectively suppress noise, even when the circuit is intentionally disturbed by a non-negligible external pulse.210 With non-linearity, the Petermann factor can be prevented from diverging [Fig. 2(d3)]. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratio reaches its lowest value at the NEP and increases as the system moves away from the NEP [Fig. 2(d4)].

PT symmetry-based implementations can also enhance system stability. In semiconductor technologies, fast-switching devices are widely used, and achieving both high speed and stability is highly desirable.211,212 Yang et al.203 demonstrated that transient PT symmetry, as implemented in their electric circuit [Fig. 2(e1)], can significantly reduce unwanted oscillations during fast switching. Noise-induced perturbations in the oscillations decay more rapidly at the EP compared to those in the broken or unbroken PT phases [Fig. 2(e2)]. For step-like dynamic switching, transient PT symmetry effectively suppresses unwanted oscillations [red in Fig. 2(e3)], as observed from the diminishing peak around 36 MHz in the transient PT phase [blue in Fig. 2(e4)] in the frequency domain.

Mathematically, EPs can also trace out interesting mathematical structures in either parameter space or real/momentum space. EPs underlie braiding in the complex eigenvalue plane213,214 and define knots in the band topology.215 By designing non-Hermitian circuits involving multiple bands, Cao et al.204 achieved higher-order EPs. The shape of knots or braids primarily depends on the winding paths around the EPs.216 For example, a circuit with two nodes [Fig. 2(f1) and 2(f2)] or three nodes [Fig. 2(f3)] can exhibit two-component or three-component knot topology, with double or triple twisting in the complex eigenenergy plane, respectively. Momentum-space EP knots are also described in Refs. 217–219. In a larger parameter space, multi-band EPs can also describe mathematical singularities known as catastrophes, which have deep connections, i.e., McKay correspondence with diverse mathematical constructs such as the ADE classification of Lie algebras, finite subgroups of SU(2), platonic solids, and the monodromy group of simple singularities.220,221 A recent circuit experiment has mapped out the swallowtail catastrophe in parameter space.222 

2. Exceptional bound states as robust circuit resonances

The defectiveness of EPs causes the occupied band projector to be singular, leading to substantial non-locality in its two-point correlation functions. A prominent consequence is the appearance of special isolated eigenstates [Fig. 3(a)] of the real-space truncated two-point correlator matrix known as exceptional bound (EB) states.223–226 These EB states differ from topological modes, which are protected by non-trivial bulk topology, and non-Hermitian skin modes, which stem from non-trivial point gap band topology and are also boundary-localized in open-boundary systems.227–234 While most eigenvalues p̄ of the truncated two-point correlator matrix remain clustered around 0 or 1, as in non-EB cases, a distinctive pair of EB states p̄EB and 1p̄EB additionally appears as long as the parent Hamiltonian is defective [Fig. 3(a)]. The value of p̄EB scales strongly with the system size, as detailed in Refs. 223 and 224. Since the spectrum of the truncated two-point correlator matrix corresponds to fermionic occupation probabilities, EB states also lead to negative entanglement entropy in the context of free fermions,223,224,235 with interesting ramifications in topological226 or competitive non-Hermitian skin effect settings.236 

FIG. 3.

Observation of exceptional bound (EB) states in electrical circuits. (a) Exceptional bound states in the spectrum p̄ of the truncated two-point function matrix arise robustly from eigenspace defectiveness at EPs. When implemented in an electrical circuit, they show up as strong isolated circuit resonances (yellow) in addition to the usual peaks near 0 and 1. (b) Schematic of the circuit in implementing the circuit Laplacian hosting EB states, as studied in Ref. 223. Op-amps are used to realize the asymmetric couplings. (c) Simulated and measured node voltages as a function of AC frequency ω exhibit voltage profiles corresponding to the spatial profile of the EB states at resonant frequencies corresponding to the two EB eigenvalues, p̄1 and p̄2. [(a)–(c) adapted with permission from Zou et al., Sci. Bull. 69, 2194 (2024). Copyright 2024 Science China Press.]

FIG. 3.

Observation of exceptional bound (EB) states in electrical circuits. (a) Exceptional bound states in the spectrum p̄ of the truncated two-point function matrix arise robustly from eigenspace defectiveness at EPs. When implemented in an electrical circuit, they show up as strong isolated circuit resonances (yellow) in addition to the usual peaks near 0 and 1. (b) Schematic of the circuit in implementing the circuit Laplacian hosting EB states, as studied in Ref. 223. Op-amps are used to realize the asymmetric couplings. (c) Simulated and measured node voltages as a function of AC frequency ω exhibit voltage profiles corresponding to the spatial profile of the EB states at resonant frequencies corresponding to the two EB eigenvalues, p̄1 and p̄2. [(a)–(c) adapted with permission from Zou et al., Sci. Bull. 69, 2194 (2024). Copyright 2024 Science China Press.]

Close modal

Experimentally, EB states can be simulated in classical platforms that mathematically describe the two-point correlator matrix. Electrical circuits are particularly suited for this purpose because any two nodes can be connected at will, free from the constraints of locality. As a pioneering demonstration, the circuit [Fig. 3(b)] designed by Zou et al.223 successfully demonstrated the robustness of EB states through measured voltage profiles [Fig. 3(c)]. Strong resonances at frequencies corresponding to the eigenvalues of the EB states were detected, demonstrating the direct measurability of these states. These EB states are shown to be much more robust than the non-EB resonances, which can be significantly disturbed by relatively minute perturbations of the larger hoppings.223 

One of the most intensely studied non-Hermitian phenomenon is the non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE), where states accumulate against spatial inhomogeneities, impurities, or boundaries165,227,229,230,237–269 challenging conventional condensed-matter insights into the correspondence between bulk and boundary properties.

In most cases, the NHSE occurs when the periodic boundary condition (PBC) spectrum encloses a finite area in the 2D complex spectral plane, which generally occurs when asymmetric couplings are present. Then, it can be shown that the open boundary condition (OBC) spectrum must assume the form of arcs or branches within the PBC spectral loop. Referring the reader to the many excellent references that elaborate on this,228,231,234,241,245,270–276 we briefly note that the OBC spectrum and, hence the NHSE, can be understood from the Bloch PBC Hamiltonian H(k) by complex-deforming the momentum, i.e., introducing an imaginary flux,242,248,276,277
(12)
where k and κ represent the real and imaginary components of the momentum wavevector, respectively. The form of the complex deformation κ(k), which generically depends on k, is crucial for understanding the nature of the so-called skin modes, which exponentially localize against the system’s boundaries. For any Bloch wavevector k with eigenvector ψk, an appropriate complex momentum deformation kk + (k) would yield the OBC eigenequation,
(13)
where EOBC belongs to the OBC spectrum. Here, ψk+(k)(x) ∼ eκ(k)x is the complex momentum-deformed eigenstate that tends toward the OBC eigenstate in the thermodynamic limit, with κ(k) having the physical interpretation of the inverse skin decay length. From Eq. (13), EOBC and its corresponding κ(k) are related via the characteristic equation,
(14)
Because EOBC is in general not in the Bloch (PBC) spectrum, κ(k) is in general nonzero too. To determine values of EOBC, which are actually allowed to exist in the OBC spectrum, we note that satisfying OBCs at both boundaries simultaneously generally requires the exact OBC eigenstate to be a superposition of two different bulk solutions with equal decay lengths κ−1. In other words, the OBC eigenenergies are those values of EOBC for which Eq. (14) simultaneously admits two different k solutions with the same value of κ(k), a condition famously known as the GBZ condition.239,276,278–280

Note that the GBZ condition, as well as the existence of a unique κ(k) that quantifies the skin accumulation, may no longer hold when more than one NHSE channel coexists in the system. A prominent example is the critical non-Hermitian skin effect (cNHSE),225,236,281–286 where weakly coupled chains with different NHSE directions produces feedback loops that amplify certain states and lead to qualitatively different band structure descriptions at different system sizes. Appropriately designed cNHSE systems may even undergo an exceptional phase transition at a particular system size, with special scaling-induced EP defectiveness and leading to unique entanglement dips.225 Fundamentally, the GBZ condition hinges on the assumption that the OBC eigenstate only comprise of the superposition of two bulk solutions; relaxing that generally leads to a “fragmented” GBZ in which more than one κ(k) participates in the physics substantially.287,288

1. Circuit demonstrations of one-dimensional NHSE phenomena

Extensive eigenmode localization was first observed experimentally in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit implementation. Helbig et al.46 constructed an SSH circuit [Fig. 4(a1)], where intra-cell couplings were made non-reciprocal using negative impedance converters with current inversion (INICs), as shown in Fig. 4(a2). The INIC changes the phase of the component connected to the inverting (negative) pole of the op-amp by 180°, producing effective negative impedance from right to left and positive impedance from left to right. The two-node Laplacian of this INIC circuit takes the form
(15)
where γ represents the magnitude of the non-reciprocal capacitance. This Laplacian ensures that the currents between the two nodes (A and B) flow in opposite directions, i.e., IAB = IBA, resulting in non-reciprocal impedance with current conversion. A unit cell of the circuit in Ref. 46 is shown in Fig. 4(a3), and includes an INIC (red box). Assembling the unit cells into a circuit array realizes the k-space circuit Laplacian,
(16)
When γ = 0, the Laplacian describes a Hermitian SSH circuit, with ν(ω) and r representing the reciprocal intra- and inter-cell coupling admittances, respectively. When γ ≠ 0, the effective intra-cell coupling becomes non-reciprocal, leading to a non-Hermitian SSH circuit. All the voltages localize at the left (right) boundary under OBCs when the driving frequency f = ω/2π is below (above) the critical frequency [left and right plots in Fig. 4(a4)]. At the critical frequency, no localized skin modes are present.
FIG. 4.

Circuit realizations of non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE) phenomena. (a) First experimental realization of the NHSE using impedance converters (a2) for non-reciprocal couplings. Voltage is localized either to the left or right when coupling asymmetry is broken [left and right in (a4), respectively], while localization is absent when reciprocity is restored [middle in (a4)].46 [Adapted with permission from Helbig et al., Nat. Phys. 16, 747–750 (2020). Copyright 2020 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Control of the NHSE in a multi-component circuit with multiple asymmetric couplings. Mode localization (darker colors indicate larger eigenmode magnitudes) can still occur in models with multiple asymmetric couplings by setting one of the asymmetric couplings [Cn1 in (b1) and (b3)] relative to the critical value.289 [Adapted with permission from Rafi-Ul-Islam et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043108 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Circuit realization of NHSE in a spherical geometry, exhibiting a localized profile around a topological defect. The elevated voltage measured at the defective node, shown in panel (c4), demonstrates defect-induced localization.290 [Adapted with permission from Shen et al., Ann. Phys. 536(11), 2400026 (2024). Copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH.] (d) Hybrid higher-order NHSE in non-reciprocal 2D and 3D topolectrical lattices, where topological localization in one direction can control the skin localization in a transverse direction. The skin–topological (ST effect) and skin–skin–skin (SSS effect) hybrid higher-order effects are observed as localized voltages at the corners shown in panels (d2) and (d3), scaling with different co-dimensions.164 [Adapted with permission from Zou et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 7201 (2021). Copyright 2021 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (e) Hybrid skin–topological NHSE can be harnessed as topological switches for the NHSE, where the extent of resistive loss is used to drive topological transitions which in turn activate or inactivate the NHSE in a transverse direction. The eigenmode localization of skin–topo–skin and skin–topo–topo cases, shown in panel (e2), exhibits two and four corner localization behaviors.291 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 085426 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (f) Control of topological modes by the NHSE in a honeycomb lattice. The topological mode is dragged by NHSE as the capacitance parameter C2 increases, as shown in panel (f4).292 [Adapted with permission from Tang et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, 035410 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (g) Realization of particle interaction dynamics in a classical circuit array by mapping the 1-dimensional degrees of freedom of multiple particles onto the degrees of freedom of a single particle in multiple dimensions. Interaction-induced non-Hermitian aggregation effects are observed as impedance resonances at Hilbert space boundaries. The impedance peaks shown in panel (g3), while approaching the effective boundaries, demonstrate skin accumulation toward the boundary.293 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. B 105, 195131 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society.] (h) Reciprocal skin effect in a 2D fully passive electrical circuit with diagonal loss elements introducing non-Hermiticity. The inverse participation ratio shows no localized states [left in panel (h3)] under periodic boundary conditions, but skin states are present under open boundary conditions [right in panel (h3)].127 [Adapted with permission from Hofmann et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023265 (2020). Copyright 2020 American Physical Society.] (i) NHSE driven by higher-rank chirality in a 2D fully passive electrical circuit, where a 1D chiral mode is most amplified.294 [Adapted with permission from Zhu et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 720 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (j) Scale-tailored non-Hermitian localization realized in a circuit with long-range asymmetric couplings. The spatial profiles of eigenstates show perfect overlap for different combinations of tail and circuit sizes but become less localized as the tail size l increases.167 [Adapted with permission from Guo et al., Nat. Commun. 15, 9120 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

FIG. 4.

Circuit realizations of non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE) phenomena. (a) First experimental realization of the NHSE using impedance converters (a2) for non-reciprocal couplings. Voltage is localized either to the left or right when coupling asymmetry is broken [left and right in (a4), respectively], while localization is absent when reciprocity is restored [middle in (a4)].46 [Adapted with permission from Helbig et al., Nat. Phys. 16, 747–750 (2020). Copyright 2020 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Control of the NHSE in a multi-component circuit with multiple asymmetric couplings. Mode localization (darker colors indicate larger eigenmode magnitudes) can still occur in models with multiple asymmetric couplings by setting one of the asymmetric couplings [Cn1 in (b1) and (b3)] relative to the critical value.289 [Adapted with permission from Rafi-Ul-Islam et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043108 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Circuit realization of NHSE in a spherical geometry, exhibiting a localized profile around a topological defect. The elevated voltage measured at the defective node, shown in panel (c4), demonstrates defect-induced localization.290 [Adapted with permission from Shen et al., Ann. Phys. 536(11), 2400026 (2024). Copyright 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH.] (d) Hybrid higher-order NHSE in non-reciprocal 2D and 3D topolectrical lattices, where topological localization in one direction can control the skin localization in a transverse direction. The skin–topological (ST effect) and skin–skin–skin (SSS effect) hybrid higher-order effects are observed as localized voltages at the corners shown in panels (d2) and (d3), scaling with different co-dimensions.164 [Adapted with permission from Zou et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 7201 (2021). Copyright 2021 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (e) Hybrid skin–topological NHSE can be harnessed as topological switches for the NHSE, where the extent of resistive loss is used to drive topological transitions which in turn activate or inactivate the NHSE in a transverse direction. The eigenmode localization of skin–topo–skin and skin–topo–topo cases, shown in panel (e2), exhibits two and four corner localization behaviors.291 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 085426 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (f) Control of topological modes by the NHSE in a honeycomb lattice. The topological mode is dragged by NHSE as the capacitance parameter C2 increases, as shown in panel (f4).292 [Adapted with permission from Tang et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, 035410 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (g) Realization of particle interaction dynamics in a classical circuit array by mapping the 1-dimensional degrees of freedom of multiple particles onto the degrees of freedom of a single particle in multiple dimensions. Interaction-induced non-Hermitian aggregation effects are observed as impedance resonances at Hilbert space boundaries. The impedance peaks shown in panel (g3), while approaching the effective boundaries, demonstrate skin accumulation toward the boundary.293 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. B 105, 195131 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society.] (h) Reciprocal skin effect in a 2D fully passive electrical circuit with diagonal loss elements introducing non-Hermiticity. The inverse participation ratio shows no localized states [left in panel (h3)] under periodic boundary conditions, but skin states are present under open boundary conditions [right in panel (h3)].127 [Adapted with permission from Hofmann et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023265 (2020). Copyright 2020 American Physical Society.] (i) NHSE driven by higher-rank chirality in a 2D fully passive electrical circuit, where a 1D chiral mode is most amplified.294 [Adapted with permission from Zhu et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 720 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (j) Scale-tailored non-Hermitian localization realized in a circuit with long-range asymmetric couplings. The spatial profiles of eigenstates show perfect overlap for different combinations of tail and circuit sizes but become less localized as the tail size l increases.167 [Adapted with permission from Guo et al., Nat. Commun. 15, 9120 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

Close modal
Although a single asymmetric coupling within a unit cell may intuitively suggest boundary localization in the direction of asymmetry, this may not be true due to destructive interference.226 Indeed, the cumulative effect of multiple asymmetric couplings with opposing decay profiles remains intriguing. Rafi-Ul-Islam et al.289 investigated circuit lattices with fully non-reciprocal couplings [Fig. 4(b1)], with unit cells comprising four non-reciprocal nodes [Fig. 4(b2)]. Interestingly, the NHSE in their dimer SSH circuit with both intra- and inter-cell non-reciprocal couplings can vanish when the overall inverse localization length reaches a critical decay threshold, given by
(17)
where κ depends on both non-reciprocal capacitive parameters Cn1 and Cn2, and becomes zero when Cn1=C1Cn2C2. The localization boundary criterion remains governed by the sign of the overall inverse decay κ, consistent with established conventions. For example, in Fig. 4(b3), the darker colors represent node voltage peaks that shift from one boundary to another (node 1–40) when Cn1 goes from below to above the critical value.

In a related vein, Shen et al.290 conducted a circuit experiment involving multiple asymmetric hoppings in coupled 1D SSH chains [Fig. 4(c1)]. They extended this setup by connecting multiple 1D SSH chains to form a spherical geometry, paving the framework for studying the interplay between band topology and real-space lattice topology.166 While localization behavior in various lattice geometries, including kagome and honeycomb lattices,295,296 has been widely studied, in the spherical model [Figs. 4(c2) and 4(c3)], localization occurs only when a defect is introduced [pointed by red arrow in Fig. 4(c4)]. In addition, Jiang et al.297 demonstrated how circuits with multiple non-reciprocal couplings can give rise to corner modes in 2D circuits.

2. Circuit demonstrations of higher-dimensional NHSE phenomena

Typically, the NHSE drags all the bulk states toward a boundary.232 However, in two or more dimensions, Zou et al.164 demonstrated that the NHSE can selectively pump topological modes while leaving the bulk unaffected, in what is known as the hybrid higher-order skin–topological (ST) effect.259 The idea is that, in a multi-dimensional lattice, it is possible for topological modes under mixed boundary conditions to possess a spectral point gap, but not the non-topological modes. Further opening up the remaining boundary(ies) will then result in the NHSE only for the topological modes. In Ref. 164, the 2D network consists of a unit cell with four nodes, with asymmetric intra-cell couplings implemented using INICs [Fig. 4(d1)]. With suitable parameter tuning, the 2D and 3D circuit implementations [Figs. 4(d2) and 4(d3)] exhibit skin–topological (ST) and skin–skin–skin (SSS) effects, respectively. These hybrid skin–topological modes arise from the interplay between topological and skin modes and cannot exist without either. Notably, these ST modes can exhibit localized skin behavior despite the absence of net non-reciprocity, since the reciprocity is spontaneously broken by the topological modes taking unequal amplitudes in the two sub-lattices.

The hybrid skin–topological effect259 has also inspired a scheme for switching on or off the NHSE by toggling the topological character of the perpendicular sub-chains, as was first proposed in the cold atom context.298 When the switch is activated by adjusting the loss parameter, non-reciprocal pumping prevails, driven by non-reciprocity introduced by the switch. Zhang et al.291 experimentally demonstrated this topological switching using their 3D circuit [Fig. 4(e1)]. The voltage dynamics across four different unit cells revealed distinct eigenmode distributions, such as skin–topo–skin and skin–topo–topo modes [Fig. 4(e2) and 4(e3)]. The absence or presence of skin modes corresponds to trivial or non-trivial topological modes, which are tuned through relays that switch resistors on or off between specific nodes.

The interplay between topology and the NHSE was further explored by Tang et al.292 through an experimental implementation of a rhombus honeycomb lattice electrical circuit [Fig. 4(f1)]. By tuning the non-reciprocity (controlled by C2 in their design), the topologically localized corner modes at the acute angles of the rhombus lattice [Fig. 4(f2)] are significantly dragged through the bulk, allowing the NHSE to control the topological modes [Figs. 4(f3) and 4(f4)].

3. Circuit demonstrations of interacting NHSE phenomena

Despite being classical systems, electrical circuits can also simulate few-body interaction dynamics through mappings between many-body one-dimensional models and single-body multi-dimensional models.48,299–301 In addition to their practical value, such mappings can also lend new physical insights,302–304 such as the interpretation of two-body repulsion as 2-dimensional boundary effects, and 3-body non-Hermitian interactions as feedback mechanisms on a 2-dimensional non-orthogonal non-Hermitian lattice whose GBZ description is notoriously subtle.245 In particular, effective boundaries can be defined in the Hilbert space even when the lattice has PBCs along each direction. Reverse implementations of such mappings have also enabled small interacting quantum systems to simulate the physics in far larger multi-dimensional lattices.305–307 

Zhang et al.293 designed a circuit based on mapping the eigenstates of their strongly correlated non-Hermitian few-body system [Fig. 4(g1)]. Through impedance measurements, they observed the simulated aggregation of bosonic clusters in their circuit. The impedance resonances in the spatial circuit [Fig. 4(g2)] correspond to eigenstate aggregation in the corresponding Hilbert space [Fig. 4(g3)]. This realization serves as a compelling example of the feasibility of topolectrical circuits to model many-body interactions in a very accessible manner.

4. Implementing NHSE without non-reciprocal couplings

Although paradigmatic examples of the NHSE—such as the Hatano-Nelson model308—are commonly realized using non-reciprocal (asymmetric) couplings, the NHSE can still manifest in reciprocal systems without requiring such asymmetry. In the so-called reciprocal non-Hermitian skin effect, a reciprocal system is designed such that it contains subsystems harboring equal and opposite NHSE, such that NHSE accumulation occurs in specific subsectors despite the system being reciprocal on the whole. This was first demonstrated by Hofmann et al.,127 who measured eigenmode localization at the edges of their 2D circuit [Fig. 4(h1)]. A diagonal imaginary hopping within the square plaquette makes the Hamiltonian globally non-Hermitian but still reciprocal; with a basis transform, it can be shown that it contains “hidden” equal and opposite NHSE chains at different transverse momentum sectors or effective flux. This imaginary hopping—realized as a resistor in their model [Fig. 4(h2)]—results in different hopping probabilities in the presence of this effective flux, resulting in unequal amplitudes in opposite directions [Fig. 4(h3)].

In two dimensions, a reciprocal 2D lattice can also exhibit nontrivial system size-dependent NHSE in the presence of higher-rank chirality,309 characterized by a non-conserved charge current.310 First demonstrated in Ref. 309, a higher-rank chiral mode (rank-2) was also demonstrated by Zhu et al.294 through gain/loss couplings that create an unbalanced chirality in the unidirectional chiral mode flow [Fig. 4(i1)]. This imbalance causes one specific mode to amplify and hence outlast others, leading to eventual mode localization. The long-lived rank-2 chiral mode dominates the system’s long-time dynamics and is observable in momentum-resolved measurements [Figs. 4(i2) and 4(i3)]. Remarkably, momentum-dependent input excitations lead to mode accumulation at specific driven locations in the lattice [Fig. 4(i4)]. This enables a versatile implementation of NHSE along a desired direction and position in a fully passive and reciprocal lattice, distinguishing it from the reciprocal skin effect presented in Ref. 127. (Even in the absence of gain/loss and non-reciprocity in the lattice bulk, non-Hermiticity can emerge through the interaction Hamiltonian in an electromagnetically engineered metamaterial that is inversely designed from a TE lattice;311 also see Ref. 312, where the NHSE is realized in reciprocal lattices via gauge fields without gain or loss.)

5. Demonstrating unconventional NHSE phenomena with long-range couplings

The extreme versatility of electrical circuit connections, which can directly couple any two desired nodes independent of their physical distance, makes them ideal for implementing intrinsically long-ranged models.313 Since the NHSE is already highly non-local in that it leads to dramatic state accumulation in a spatially-distant edge, it is particularly susceptible to the effects of long-ranged hoppings that can change the overall real-space topology of the lattice. For instance, a single non-reciprocal impurity hopping in an otherwise homogeneous Hatano-Nelson chain is known to lead to enigmatic scale-free localization.314–316 

Recently, Guo et al.167 introduced the new notion of scale-tailored localization (STL), distinct from conventional NHSE or Anderson localization.317 The STL is a spectacular demonstration of how singularities in the skin localization length subtly interplays with hopping non-locality, as was implemented via unidirectional couplings with INIC circuit elements, and a long-range coupling controlled by switches [Fig. 4(j1)]. For this circuit, some of the admittance eigenvalues encircle the unit circle, while others are isolated within it [Fig. 4(j2)]. The spatial distribution of the corresponding STL eigenstates exhibits varying localization lengths that depend on the long-range coupling distance [Fig. 4(j3)].

Since the NHSE is a dramatic phenomenon that arises from merely changing the boundary couplings, it is symptomatic of extreme sensitivity to spatial perturbations. In the following, we highlight some experiments that attempt to point toward potential sensing applications in electrical circuit settings.

The primary interest in the NHSE stems from its strong dependence on local perturbations, such as a coupling between the two ends of a chain, which can drastically alter the OBC vs PBC properties. Furthermore, a non-Hermitian topological lattice exhibits extreme sensitivity to its size due to the exponential growth of NHSE states, as formulated theoretically by Budich and Bergholtz318 and popularized as non-Hermitian topological sensors.319 This phenomenon was experimentally demonstrated by Yuan et al.96 [Fig. 5(a1)]. The shift in resonance peak frequency occurs through two mechanisms: (i) control of the boundary coupling capacitance through the displacement and rotation of the copper electrodes [Fig. 5(a2)] and (ii) variations in the number of nodes in the circuit. The impedance resonances exhibit exponential behavior in response to circuit size N [Fig. 5(a3)].

FIG. 5.

Non-Hermitian sensing applications with electrical circuits. (a) Non-Hermitian topological sensor realized in a circuit with adjustable boundary perturbations and circuit size, with size-dependent shifts in the impedance peak frequency as shown in panel (a3).96 [Adapted with permission from Yuan et al., Adv. Sci. 10(19), 2301128 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Non-Hermitian ohmmeter exhibiting exponential sensitivity to large resistance measurements. The sensitivity increases exponentially as the number of nodes increases, as shown in panel (b3).320 [Adapted with permission from Könye et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, L031001 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (c) Non-local impedance response in a fully passive circuit.100 (c1) The NHSE in two weakly coupled Hatano-Nelson 1D lattices may not cancel off despite zero net reciprocity and can be basis-transformed into a purely lossy reciprocal model. (c2) The corresponding purely resistive electrical circuit with switches (SR1–SR6) that control the boundary conditions. (c3) Ratio of the PBC vs OBC impedances between nodes in the two physical chains, with substantially different PBC and OBC impedances for inter-chain impedances (red, right plot). (c4) Robust isolated boundary modes that emerge only in the presence of parasitic resistances and sufficiently large system length. [(c1)–(c4) adapted with permission from Zhang et al., SciPost Phys. 16, 002 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

FIG. 5.

Non-Hermitian sensing applications with electrical circuits. (a) Non-Hermitian topological sensor realized in a circuit with adjustable boundary perturbations and circuit size, with size-dependent shifts in the impedance peak frequency as shown in panel (a3).96 [Adapted with permission from Yuan et al., Adv. Sci. 10(19), 2301128 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Non-Hermitian ohmmeter exhibiting exponential sensitivity to large resistance measurements. The sensitivity increases exponentially as the number of nodes increases, as shown in panel (b3).320 [Adapted with permission from Könye et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, L031001 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (c) Non-local impedance response in a fully passive circuit.100 (c1) The NHSE in two weakly coupled Hatano-Nelson 1D lattices may not cancel off despite zero net reciprocity and can be basis-transformed into a purely lossy reciprocal model. (c2) The corresponding purely resistive electrical circuit with switches (SR1–SR6) that control the boundary conditions. (c3) Ratio of the PBC vs OBC impedances between nodes in the two physical chains, with substantially different PBC and OBC impedances for inter-chain impedances (red, right plot). (c4) Robust isolated boundary modes that emerge only in the presence of parasitic resistances and sufficiently large system length. [(c1)–(c4) adapted with permission from Zhang et al., SciPost Phys. 16, 002 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

Close modal

Based on the exponential response to boundary perturbations in non-Hermitian circuits, Könye et al.320 designed a non-Hermitian topological ohmmeter with reciprocal coupling between the first and last terminals (reminiscent of Ref. 96), utilizing it as a sensor to precisely measure large resistances (Γ in Fig. 5(b1)), typically in the mega-ohm range. The measurement of large resistances often suffers from reduced precision due to significant losses. However, their multi-terminal non-Hermitian ohmmeter circuit demonstrated exponentially increasing sensitivity [Fig. 5(b2)] with the number of terminals, comparing favorably with standard measurement techniques [Fig. 5(b3)].

Enhanced response can also be achieved through various mechanisms, such as multiple non-local long-range asymmetric couplings, which lead to an Nth-order sensitive response, where N represents the number of nodes, as introduced in Refs. 95 and 97. Reference 148 also presents an integrated circuit sensor demonstrating an exponential response with respect to the device size, based on higher-order non-Hermitian topology.

In the previous non-Hermitian sensing experiments, the underlying mechanism is directional amplification, which results in a strongly non-local response. Indeed, exponential sensitivity intuitively requires a non-reciprocal non-Hermitian bulk, achieved through asymmetric couplings,321 which necessitate active elements such as op-amps in INICs.322,323 However, Zhang et al.100 presented a fully passive circuit demonstrating a highly distinct impedance response dependent on the presence of a boundary coupling, even though the circuit uses only resistors as the non-Hermitian components.

The non-local impedance response in this passive circuit is due to the presence of “hidden” coupled Hatano-Nelson chains with opposite amplifications, as seen through a basis rotation [Fig. 5(c1)]. After the basis transform, the effective momentum space circuit Laplacian J̃(k) at the resonant frequency is expressed as
(18)
where ξ(k) = r−1 + 2R−1 − 2(R−1 + ω0C) cos(k). Here, ξ(k) represents the reciprocal part of each chain, while 2ω0Ce±ik denotes the asymmetric contributions. The two chains, coupled by −r−1, effectively experience opposite NHSE due to unbalanced gain/loss couplings. The boundary conditions of the corresponding circuit [Fig. 5(c2)] are controlled via switches, appropriately configured for the desired behavior.

Experimentally, the circuit’s response to non-local perturbations is characterized by the ratio of two-point impedance values under PBCs vs OBCs: ZPBC/ZOBC. While this impedance ratio across all two-point configurations within individual chains remains approximately equal to 1 [the two light blue plots on the left in Fig. 5(c3)], the impedance across inter-ladder pairs deviates significantly, with the ratio hovering around 6 [red in the right plot in Fig. 5(c3)]. This indicates substantial non-local impedance response to the boundary coupling, which is interestingly obtained in a purely resistive circuit, without using any amplificative components such as op-amps.

While this setup may seem to be just another demonstration of the reciprocal NHSE127 [see Fig. 4(h) in Sec. III B 4], the effective inter-chain −1/r coupling is set to be relatively weak compared to the intra-chain terms, such that the NHSE from both chains does not simply cancel in the intended experimental setup. However, due to the exponential sensitivity of the NHSE, they still do cancel for sufficiently long circuits, as a variation of the critical NHSE236,281–283 (refer to the discussion related to Fig. 4(b) in Sec. III B 1). In this model, the circuit exhibits curious size-dependent isolated modes only in the presence of parasitic resistances [Fig. 5(c4)], when the OBC circuit is sufficiently long. Their spatial profiles are boundary-localized in a unique manner, as shown in the two rightmost plots in Fig. 5(c4). Despite being robust against perturbations, such isolated modes do not appear to be protected by any conventional topological invariant, appearing at certain ranges of system sizes.

In the following, we highlight other studies on topolectrical circuits, mostly experimental, which are centered around more traditional (mostly Hermitian) condensed matter phenomena. In this review, heavier emphasis is placed on the simulation of phenomena that are not easily achieved in conventional quantum matter.

Introducing non-linear dynamics into a system reveals intriguing phenomena that are unattainable in linear systems, such as higher harmonic generation,140,324,325 soliton wave propagation,326–329 non-linear bands,330 non-linear interface modes,331 and various non-Hermitian interplays.208,332–337 In particular, in the presence of non-linear interactions, coherent collective dynamics can emerge among the autonomous units hosting non-linear oscillators. Of particular interest is the incorporation of a topological mechanism, which facilitates self-organized, protected boundary oscillations.331,332,338 A common approach to realizing non-linear topological phenomena involves arranging non-linear oscillatory elements in a topological configuration, such as by dimerizing an array of oscillators in deference to the well-known SSH configuration.

In electrical circuits, non-linear oscillators necessarily involve active components such as op-amps and typically do not require external driving. Kotwal et al.81 demonstrated an archetypal topological circuit implementation hosting non-linear van der Pol (vdP) oscillators. The dynamics of a single oscillator with coordinate xi is governed by
(19)
where ϵ=αL/C, t=LCt̂, ẋi=dxi/dt̂, and t is physical time. When the tunable real positive parameter α is zero, the vdP differential equation reduces to that of a simple harmonic oscillator, representing a linear system. However, vdP oscillators exhibit non-linear oscillations for α ≠ 0, driven by a negative non-linear resistance that can be tuned via α. In practice, this negative resistance in a unit [Fig. 6(a1)] is realized using a Chua diode, which exhibits non-linear current–voltage characteristics. A 1D array of these oscillators [Fig. 6(a2)], arranged in a topological dimer configuration, exhibits distinct oscillations at the edge nodes, reminiscent of topological edge modes [Fig. 6(a3)]. Extending this concept to a 2D network [Fig. 6(a4)], the vdP oscillators display chiral-like edge oscillations that remain robust even in the presence of edge defects [Fig. 6(a5)]. These circuits, composed of onsite autonomous units, are referred to as active topolectrical circuits.
FIG. 6.

Realization of non-linear phenomena in topolectrical circuits. (a) Active topolectrical circuits with autonomous non-linear on-site oscillators exhibit synchronized oscillations at sites corresponding to topological modes.81 [Adapted with permission from Kotwal et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118(32), e2106411118 (2021). Copyright 2021 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Non-linear transmission line containing voltage-dependent intra-cell capacitors. A topological phase transition [the peak at 98 MHz in (b3)] occurs with sufficiently strong transmitted signal intensity.137 [Adapted with permission from Hadad et al., Nat. Electron. 1, 178–182 (2018). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.] (c) Second-order non-linear circuit with topological corner modes activated by the intensity of the input signal.83 [Adapted with permission from Zangeneh-Nejad and Fleury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 053902 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Physical Society.] (d) Generation of cnoidal solitonic waves in a topological circuit with non-linear grounded capacitors.327 [Adapted with permission from Hohmann et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012041 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (e) Topological enhancement of third-harmonic generation in a non-linear transmission line with voltage-dependent intra-cell capacitors.82 [Adapted with permission from Wang et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 1102 (2019). Copyright 2019 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (f) Topologically enhanced third-harmonic generation in a ladder circuit with double-edge localization.339 [Adapted with permission from Hu et al., Commun. Phys. 7, 204 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (g) Observation of frequency combs induced by the non-linear behavior of strongly pumped operational amplifiers.340 [Adapted with permission from Yang et al., arXiv:2410.19598 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0] (h) Non-linearity-induced non-Hermitian skin effect, realized through Kerr-type non-linearity implemented by back-to-back onsite varactors.341 [Adapted with permission from Lo et al., arXiv:2411.13841 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (i) Global synchronization due to the non-Hermitian skin effect in a non-linear circuit with on-site Stuart–Landau oscillators.342 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Adv. Sci. 12(2), 2408460 (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (j) Robust edge suppression and topologically protected chaotic oscillations in a lattice of Chua circuits. The non-linearity can be controlled by adjusting the current–voltage slope in the Chua diode.343 [Adapted with permission from Sahin et al., arXiv:2411.07522 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

FIG. 6.

Realization of non-linear phenomena in topolectrical circuits. (a) Active topolectrical circuits with autonomous non-linear on-site oscillators exhibit synchronized oscillations at sites corresponding to topological modes.81 [Adapted with permission from Kotwal et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118(32), e2106411118 (2021). Copyright 2021 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Non-linear transmission line containing voltage-dependent intra-cell capacitors. A topological phase transition [the peak at 98 MHz in (b3)] occurs with sufficiently strong transmitted signal intensity.137 [Adapted with permission from Hadad et al., Nat. Electron. 1, 178–182 (2018). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature.] (c) Second-order non-linear circuit with topological corner modes activated by the intensity of the input signal.83 [Adapted with permission from Zangeneh-Nejad and Fleury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 053902 (2019). Copyright 2019 American Physical Society.] (d) Generation of cnoidal solitonic waves in a topological circuit with non-linear grounded capacitors.327 [Adapted with permission from Hohmann et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012041 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (e) Topological enhancement of third-harmonic generation in a non-linear transmission line with voltage-dependent intra-cell capacitors.82 [Adapted with permission from Wang et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 1102 (2019). Copyright 2019 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (f) Topologically enhanced third-harmonic generation in a ladder circuit with double-edge localization.339 [Adapted with permission from Hu et al., Commun. Phys. 7, 204 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (g) Observation of frequency combs induced by the non-linear behavior of strongly pumped operational amplifiers.340 [Adapted with permission from Yang et al., arXiv:2410.19598 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0] (h) Non-linearity-induced non-Hermitian skin effect, realized through Kerr-type non-linearity implemented by back-to-back onsite varactors.341 [Adapted with permission from Lo et al., arXiv:2411.13841 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (i) Global synchronization due to the non-Hermitian skin effect in a non-linear circuit with on-site Stuart–Landau oscillators.342 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Adv. Sci. 12(2), 2408460 (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (j) Robust edge suppression and topologically protected chaotic oscillations in a lattice of Chua circuits. The non-linearity can be controlled by adjusting the current–voltage slope in the Chua diode.343 [Adapted with permission from Sahin et al., arXiv:2411.07522 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.]

Close modal
In addition to having autonomous units serving as on-site potentials in a topological circuit array, it is also possible to use non-linear components, such as diodes or voltage-dependent capacitors (varactors), for inter- or intra-cell coupling. Hadad et al.137 realized a non-linear SSH circuit by alternating linear and non-linear capacitances [Fig. 6(b1)]. The non-linear capacitance is implemented using two varactor diodes connected in a back-to-back configuration, with the capacitance dependent on the voltage across the diodes’ terminals,
(20)
where ν(Vn) represents the intra-cell coupling admittance that can be non-linearly controlled by the capacitor voltage Vn, and ν0, ν, and V0 are the characteristic constants of the coupling.137 This setup makes the non-linear coupling [ν(Vn)] sensitive to the intensity of the driving signal. As the signal intensity increases, a topological transition is induced, leading to the emergence of topological edge modes. This transition was observed through admittance vs frequency measurements. Below the threshold signal intensity, no distinct resonance is detected [Fig. 6(b2)]. However, when the signal intensity exceeds the threshold, a pronounced admittance peak appears at the expected resonant frequency [Fig. 6(b3)].

A key aspect of such non-linear topolectrical circuit realizations is the ability to achieve a topological phase transition through the excitation intensity. This dependence eliminates the need for having separate lattice configurations for trivial or non-trivial phases and allows access to robust topological modes through external pumping [Fig. 6(c1)]. Zangeneh-Nejad and Fleury83 subsequently realized a second-order non-linear TE [Fig. 6(c2)] that emulates second-order topological corner modes when the input intensity (Pin) exceeds a certain threshold. This implementation employs non-linear varactor diodes, similar to Ref. 137. For instance, when Pin is 25dBm, an admittance resonance occurs, corresponding to the second-order topological 0-dimensional corner mode [Fig. 6(c3)].

Moving away from using varactors as non-linear coupling components, Hohmann et al.327 employed varactors to create non-linear on-site potentials [Fig. 6(d1)]. This approach led to qualitatively different outcomes: injected sinusoidal waves were distorted into localized cnoidal waves—periodic, soliton-like waves [Fig. 6(d2)]. The localization behavior is attributed to topological exponential boundary localization, evident in the root-mean-square amplitudes decaying toward the bulk, demonstrative of the interplay between topological and solitonic localization. In addition, the non-linearity generates higher harmonics relative to the circuit’s driving frequency, although the amplitudes of these harmonics decrease with increasing harmonic order [Fig. 6(d3)].

Using back-to-back varactors also, Wang et al.82 introduced a non-linear transmission line circuit in which varactors were employed as intra-cell non-linear coupling components [Fig. 6(e1)]. This circuit exhibits third-harmonic signals [Fig. 6(e2)] that are much larger than the first harmonic. Interestingly, the higher-harmonic signal [blue in Fig. 6(e3)] propagates through the bulk without diminishing in amplitude. Instead, its amplitude is significantly enhanced, surpassing the edge-localized first-harmonic signal [red in Fig. 6(e3)]. Unlike in the setup of Ref. 137, this enhanced higher-harmonic behavior is attributed to the traveling-wave nature of higher-harmonic modes, which can excite the entire circuit. In contrast, the first harmonic remains localized at the edge in the deep non-linear topologically non-trivial regime [Fig. 6(e4)].

Hu et al.339 demonstrated greatly enhanced third-harmonic resonances in a mirror-stacked design consisting of two non-linear chains, each unit cell coupled by a linear capacitor [Fig. 6(f1)]. This mirror-stacked design enables the realization of both fundamental harmonics and third harmonics due to the presence of multiple edge nodes with two distinct frequency localized states. Under single-source excitation, the circuit exhibits prominent third harmonic resonances [Fig. 6(f2)], with identical voltage profiles in the first and third harmonics [Fig. 6(f3)].

While most non-linearity-related phenomena arise from non-linear elements such as varactors, Yang et al.340 observed a frequency comb generated by the non-linear behavior of op-amps under strong pumping. Frequency combs represent the proliferation of strong higher harmonics.344 The circuit by Yang et al. was designed to simulate skyrmion [Fig. 6(g1)] dynamics in the circuit unit within each node345 [Fig. 6(g2)]. Remarkably, distorted voltage oscillations resulting from op-amp saturation under a strong input signal gave rise to discrete, evenly spaced frequency combs [Fig. 6(g3)]. This observation highlights how non-linear behavior can emerge from devices inherently designed for linear operation, offering a controlled method for introducing non-linearity in circuit designs.

Lo et al.341 recently presented a non-linear circuit experiment demonstrating NHSE that emerges depending on the intensity of the driving amplitude. Interestingly, this behavior arises not from asymmetric couplings but from Kerr-type non-linear dynamics.346–348 The circuit comprises back-to-back onsite non-linear varactors [Fig. 6(h1)] assembled into a circuit array inspired by the physics of Bogoliubov modes349 [Fig. 6(h2)]. The non-linearity breaks the pseudo-Hermiticity, leading to a spectral point gap that, in turn, gives rise to NHSE localization. The sideband modes [Fig. 6(h3)], distinct from higher-order harmonics, exhibit localized profiles that depend on the auxiliary drive frequency. Due to the Kerr non-linearity, the NHSE appear only when the input signal amplitude exceeds a certain threshold [Fig. 6(h4)]. This work highlights how non-linearity can induce the NHSE in classical electrical circuits.

The complex emergent dynamical behavior in non-linear systems can sometimes pose significant challenges for achieving global synchronization.350 However, Zhang et al.342 recently demonstrated a Hatano-Nelson circuit hosting on-site non-linear Stuart–Landau oscillators [Fig. 6(i1)]. Due to the asymmetric couplings in the Hatano-Nelson circuit, Hermiticity is broken, resulting in non-orthogonal eigenmodes. This facilitates more effective communication between modes, ultimately leading to global synchronization. This behavior manifests as collective voltage oscillations observed in the time domain [Fig. 6(i2)] and in the steady-state voltage profile [Fig. 6(i3)]. This study highlights how the NHSE can enable global synchronization in non-linear experimental circuits (also refer to Ref. 351).

A cornerstone of many non-linear systems is their ability to support chaotic dynamics.343,350,352,353 A paradigmatic chaotic system is the Chua oscillator which, unlike Stuart–Landau oscillators, exhibits irregular and chaotic orbits in some parameter regimes.354 Mathematically described by the Lorenz system of differential equations, the Chua oscillator possesses a well-known circuit realization known as the Chua circuit.355–357 It can be constructed with four passive components and one active component known as the Chua diode358 [Fig. 6(j1)], which provides the requisite non-linear negative resistance. This non-linearity is evident in its non-linear current–voltage (IV) characteristic [Fig. 6(j2)], and typical chaotic behavior includes the famed double-scroll chaotic attractor [Fig. 6(j3)].

Of particular interest is how such chaotic behavior interplays with lattice band structure dynamics, such as when multiple non-linear chaotic oscillators are coupled to form an array. In Ref. 343, Sahin et al. investigated the consequences of coupling Chua oscillators in a topological SSH-like lattice structure [Fig. 6(j4)]. Since band topology is only rigorously defined in linear systems, one might intuitively expect the non-linearity, and especially its chaotic dynamics, to erode the topological localization. However, it turns out that topological edge localization persists robustly well into the non-linear regime, with the amplitudes of the chaotic scroll being very different at the bulk and edge oscillators [Fig. 6(j5)] only in the black parameter space region [Fig. 6(j6)]—the region extrapolated from the topological non-trivial parameter region defined in the linear limit. This extrapolation can be performed by tuning the IV characteristic parameter b of the Chua diode [Fig. 6(j7)] and explicitly showcases how the topological edge oscillation suppression robustly carries over from the linear into the non-linear regime.

By externally perturbing the voltage oscillations by injecting current at the left edge node, one further observes that the chaotic oscillations, which are typically highly sensitive to external perturbations, persist robustly only when in the topologically non-trivial regime. In the regime connected to the trivial phase, the injected current reduces the chaotic double-scroll portraits to non-chaotic limit-cycle oscillations [Fig. 6(j8)]. However, in the non-trivial phase, the same current injection only disturbs the edge node oscillations, leaving the bulk oscillations mostly intact [Fig. 6(j9)]. This robustness is captured as a phenomenon termed “topologically protected chaos,” where chaotic dynamics counterintuitively become more robust by the remnants of topological localization deep inside the non-linear regime.343 

Typical realizations of tight-binding condensed matter phenomena map the lattice model onto a real space physical array and are often met with challenges in implementing or maintaining a large number of lattice sites to within acceptance levels of error tolerance. One promising alternative approach is to instead realize the model in the frequency lattice, through a time-periodic driving approach known as Floquet engineering.359–376 In analogy to the Fourier correspondence between a periodic Brillouin zone and its real-space lattice, a system that is periodically driven in time should also correspond to a lattice in frequency space. This powerful analogy enables the implementation of complicated hoppings and unit cells in terms of appropriately programmed temporal driving frequency components, all within a single (time-periodic) physical unit cell.

A key difference between Floquet-driven Hamiltonian systems and Floquet-driven electrical circuits is that in the latter (electrical circuits), the main physics is contained in the steady-state relationship between the current and the voltage, i.e., the circuit Laplacian J that encapsulates Kirchhoff’s law I = JV (refer to Sec. II A). As such, impedance measurements probe the properties of the Laplacian J, rather than the time-evolution generator H. As explained in Ref. 101, this fundamental difference is reflected in the frequency dependence of the Floquet operator: while ordinary Floquet Hamiltonians can only contain a linear “background” potential in the frequency lattice,377,378 a Floquet Laplacian can depend on the frequency in arbitrarily complicated manner, depending on the frequency dependencies of its constituent components, i.e., iωC or 1/iωL for capacitive and inductive components. As such, Floquet circuit Laplacians can be engineered to possess a variety of background “potentials” in the frequency lattice, such that one can also probe impurity or edge phenomena, i.e., topological edge states in appropriately designed temporally driven electrical circuits.

Stegmaier et al.101 designed a circuit with two logical nodes that assumes the topological SSH form in the frequency domain [Fig. 7(a1)]. By employing a combination of AD633 analog multipliers and capacitors [Fig. 7(a2)], effectively time-varying capacitors were achieved, modulated at far higher frequencies (order of MHz) than what is possible with mechanical means. To recreate an SSH model in frequency space, the inter- and intra-node capacitances are time-modulated such that their temporal functional dependence resembles that of the momentum dependence of the conventional SSH model. Notably, the Floquet driving protocol is such that the effective background potential diverges at the zeroth “site” in the frequency lattice, such that it acts as a strong “barrier.” As conspicuously measured, topology boundary states exist at frequencies very near these barriers when the effective SSH parameters are tuned to topologically nontrivial values [Fig. 7(a3)]. These barrier states exhibit localized profiles in frequency space, as can be obtained by Fourier transforming the measured temporal voltage oscillations [Fig. 7(a4)]. Other than showcasing the utility of analog multipliers in effectively time-modulating circuit components at very high frequencies, this work (Ref. 101) also demonstrated that Floquet circuit Laplacians can exhibit highly customizable inhomogeneities in the frequency lattice, an important realization that has far-reaching implications in topological signal processing.

FIG. 7.

Circuit experiments for Floquet phenomena and temporal dynamics. (a) Floquet circuit that showcases topological boundary accumulation at background inhomogeneities of the Floquet Laplacian in frequency space, with time-modulation physically achieved through the use of an analog multiplier and an input signal.101 [Adapted with permission from Stegmaier et al., arXiv:2407.10191 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Observation of time-dislocated Floquet topological modes in a 3D electrical circuit, with the third (inter-layer) dimension representing the frequency lattice.136 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Nat. Commun. 16, 2050 (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Demonstration of topological AAH spectral pumping through dynamical voltage-controlled inductors.102 [Adapted with permission from Stegmaier et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023010 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (d) Observation of the temporal corner skin dynamics from the higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect in a 2D circuit.379 [Adapted with permission from Wu et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 064307 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.].

FIG. 7.

Circuit experiments for Floquet phenomena and temporal dynamics. (a) Floquet circuit that showcases topological boundary accumulation at background inhomogeneities of the Floquet Laplacian in frequency space, with time-modulation physically achieved through the use of an analog multiplier and an input signal.101 [Adapted with permission from Stegmaier et al., arXiv:2407.10191 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Observation of time-dislocated Floquet topological modes in a 3D electrical circuit, with the third (inter-layer) dimension representing the frequency lattice.136 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Nat. Commun. 16, 2050 (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Demonstration of topological AAH spectral pumping through dynamical voltage-controlled inductors.102 [Adapted with permission from Stegmaier et al., Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023010 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (d) Observation of the temporal corner skin dynamics from the higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect in a 2D circuit.379 [Adapted with permission from Wu et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 064307 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.].

Close modal

Although time-varying components enable the construction of a frequency-domain lattice through their temporal oscillations, directly observing Floquet modes can be challenging due to the substantial heating in rapidly time-modulated elements. For the goal of experimentally realizing (mathematical) Floquet behavior, one approach to circumvent this restriction is to directly simulate the frequency lattice in real space. An attempt along these lines is the experiment by Zhang et al.,136 which observed Floquet modes along temporal dislocations, in analogy to the usual spatial dislocations that host topological modes. As shown in Fig. 7(b1), a (logically) time-dependent 2D higher-order topological lattice is realized as a 3D stack of 2D layers, where the third dimension represents frequency. The time-dislocation is spatially implemented as a sudden change in the inter-layer connections between the left and right halves of the setup. These inter-layer couplings represent the (logical) driving protocol. As a result, Floquet 0 and π topological modes exist in the bandgaps [Fig. 7(b2)]. Notably, these modes exist at the dislocation between the left and right halves of the 3D circuit setup [Fig. 7(b3)], even though the spatial connectivity within each 2D layer remains completely homogeneous across the dislocation. These Floquet 0 and π modes were directly measured through impedance measurements [Fig. 7(b4)].

Time-modulated electrical circuits can also be used to demonstrate dynamical phenomena such as Thouless pumping.380 Traditionally, the Thouless pump describes the adiabatic, quantized transport of charge across a bulk gap,381 as can be deduced from spectral flow arguments. In the regime of classical electrical circuits, charge quantization is not accessible, but spectral flow can still be measured since the Laplacian spectrum corresponds to impedance resonances. Stegmaier et al.102 demonstrated such spectral pumping in an electrical circuit with inductors that are effectively time-modulated with analog multipliers [Fig. 7(c1)]. As in Ref. 101, the time modulation is controlled by an external voltage signal, which can be customized at will—here, the modulation is chosen to yield the Aubry–André–Harper (AAH) model. By measuring the impedances within the circuit, eigenfrequency bands were reconstructed as a function of the periodically pumped phase. Indeed, the expected AAH spectral flow was observed under PBCs [Fig. 7(c2)], and topological in-gap states can also be seen under OBCs [Fig. 7(c3)]. It is important to note that, unlike the quantized charge transport predicted by the Kubo formula in quantum settings, there is no occupied ground state here, and the observed state pumping is purely that of the spectral band resonances.

Even in a static electrical circuit, techniques used to resolve Floquet dynamics can also be used to measure the time-dependent behavior. In the non-Hermitian corner localization experiment by Wu et al.,379 the 2D circuit lattice, hosting non-Hermitian second-order topological phases, incorporates INICs to implement asymmetric intra-cell couplings [Fig. 7(d1)]. The modular design of the circuit, featuring detachable INIC modules, allows switching between Hermitian and non-Hermitian configurations [Fig. 7(d2)]. In the Hermitian configuration, a Gaussian pulse injected into the center of the circuit spreads across the entire lattice, as shown by the time-resolved voltage profile [Fig. 7(d3)]. In contrast, in the non-Hermitian setting, the pulse localizes at a corner of the circuit [Fig. 7(d4)]. These time-resolved voltage responses demonstrate how electrical circuits can serve as practical platforms for observing dynamical physical phenomena in real time (also see Ref. 382).

Another noteworthy result in Ref. 379 is the demonstration of the generalized Brillouin zone using the Laplace transform rather than the Fourier transform applied to the measured voltage distribution. The non-Hermiticity renders the wavevector complex, making it infeasible to obtain the Brillouin zone directly from the Fourier transform. However, Wu et al. utilized the Laplace transform method to effectively recover the generalized Brillouin zone, where different onsite admittances correspond to different contours of the band structure. Such site-resolved field distributions are highly accessible in topolectrical circuits, which is crucial for studying higher-dimensional lattices. For example, in another work,383 Wu et al. observed degeneracy conversions, including Weyl point-to-nodal line conversion and nodal line-to-entangled nodal line conversion.

Lately, there has been much interest in the band structure and topological properties of hyperbolic lattices, which can be regarded as a vast generalization of regular lattices in negatively curved space.384–395 In 2D Euclidean (flat) space, regular p-gons can be tessellated such that every vertex contains q branches, if (p − 2)(q − 2) = 4. This leaves only three possibilities {p, q} = {3, 6}, {4, 4}, {6, 3} corresponding to the triangular, square, and hexagonal lattices, respectively. Relaxing this constraint to (p − 2)(q − 2) > 4 results in an infinite variety of so-called hyperbolic lattices, which, however, need to be embedded in negatively curved space.396 While this requirement of negatively curved space embedding makes them challenging to realize in most metamaterial platforms, electrical circuit connections can describe any desired graph structure and thus emerge as promising physical platforms for hyperbolic lattices. This negative curvature fundamentally alters the propagation of modes, enriching the behavior of fundamental phenomena such as topological propagation.397 Due to the relative proliferation of boundary terminations, a hyperbolic lattice structure also alters the nature of the non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspondences in the presence of asymmetric lattice hoppings.398 The ability of electrical circuits to simulate lattices with high coordination numbers is also helpful in the realization of higher dimensional lattices.50,105,114,129,130,399–401

Lenggenhager et al.402 achieved one of the first experimental demonstrations of hyperbolic lattices on a circuit board [Fig. 8(a)]. By mapping the hyperbolic plane onto the Poincaré disk, the hyperbolic lattice takes the form of a tree with increasingly fine branches toward the boundary of the unit circle. Impedance resonances measurements reveal the eigenmodes of the hyperbolic lattice, which are distorted due to the negative curvature. By resolving the phase information at each node relative to a reference voltage, the structure of these “hyperbolic drum” eigenmodes can be mapped out.

FIG. 8.

Circuit implementations of hyperbolic lattices. (a) Hyperbolic “drum”-shaped eigenmodes on a Poincaré disk, resolved through the phase information in the node voltages.402 [Adapted with permission from Lenggenhager et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 4373 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Experimental simulation of a synthetic hyperbolic lattice with four effective hyperbolic band momenta. The synthetic momenta are implemented through adjustable phases, leading to the observation of graphene-like Dirac cones.106 [Adapted with permission from Chen et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 622 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Circuit realization of a Haldane hyperbolic lattice, with the number of measured topological zero modes increasing exponentially with lattice size.384 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 2937 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (d) Demonstration of defect-induced backscattering-immune topological states on a hyperbolic lattice.403 [Adapted with permission from Pei et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 165145 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.].

FIG. 8.

Circuit implementations of hyperbolic lattices. (a) Hyperbolic “drum”-shaped eigenmodes on a Poincaré disk, resolved through the phase information in the node voltages.402 [Adapted with permission from Lenggenhager et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 4373 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Experimental simulation of a synthetic hyperbolic lattice with four effective hyperbolic band momenta. The synthetic momenta are implemented through adjustable phases, leading to the observation of graphene-like Dirac cones.106 [Adapted with permission from Chen et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 622 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Circuit realization of a Haldane hyperbolic lattice, with the number of measured topological zero modes increasing exponentially with lattice size.384 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 2937 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (d) Demonstration of defect-induced backscattering-immune topological states on a hyperbolic lattice.403 [Adapted with permission from Pei et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 165145 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.].

Close modal
To mitigate inherent difficulties in realizing large physical hyperbolic lattices, one strategy is to employ hyperbolic band theory,385 which expresses a pseudo-infinite hyperbolic lattice in terms of hyperbolic translation operators. This was demonstrated by Chen et al.,106 who experimentally realized a graphene-like model in a pseudo-infinite synthetic hyperbolic lattice [Fig. 8(b)] with just one physical unit cell. The synthetic parameter was implemented via complex-phase elements implemented with analog multipliers. The two-port Laplacian that introduces a phase is given by
(21)
where L is the inductance and the phase ϕ is controlled by adjusting the external voltages of the analog multipliers. The diagonal entries introduce a constant offset in the admittance spectrum, while the off-diagonal terms generate the controllable complex phase between ports 1 and 2.

A key feature of finite hyperbolic lattices is that the number boundary sites scales exponentially with the radius (i.e., number of lattice generations), reminiscent of fractal lattices.404 As such, unlike in Euclidean lattices, boundary sites can dominate the Hilbert space and greatly alter bulk-boundary correspondences, even in Hermitian setups. Zhang et al.384 demonstrated the exponential proliferation of zero modes in a hyperbolic circuit [Fig. 8(c)]. These topological zero modes give rise to a large number of impedance resonances at the edge nodes, while no resonances occur in the bulk nodes.

This boundary sensitivity is reflective of the small-world connectivity of a hyperbolic lattice, a property that has inspired their application in holographic duality.405–411 The high connectivity also gives rise to heightened susceptibility to lattice defects or perturbations. Pei et al.403 experimentally constructed a hyperbolic Haldane circuit and showed that a single defect in the bulk can induce boundary-dominated one-way propagation. By introducing polygonal bulk defects into the Haldane hyperbolic lattice, robust boundary propagation was observed, even when induced by a single point defect in the bulk [Fig. 8(d)]. While the presence of zero modes was verified through impedance responses, the one-way propagation of topological edge states was demonstrated using dynamical voltage analysis.

Electrical circuits are also well-suited for simulating quantum media, both of conventional topological materials and more unconventional setups, such as Refs. 383 and 412–414. In the following, some experimental demonstrations are described, particularly those of models that are hard to simulate on other platforms.

One class of models that are particularly amenable to electrical circuit realizations are the square-root models. Given a parent Hamiltonian, the square-root of it is a lattice model in which two successive hoppings yield the same connectivity structure as the parent model (up to an unimportant constant shift).415–428 Mathematically, they may look contrived and complicated, but they inherit various properties from their parent Hamiltonians, such as midgap topological modes.429 The number of modes, including topological modes, is doubled in these lattices.430 Electrical circuits are suitable physical platforms due to their versatile connectivity, and Song et al.431 constructed a 3D square-root higher-order Weyl semi-metal by stacking 2D square-root lattices along the third dimension [Fig. 9(a)]. From the admittance spectrum, non-zero midgap topological hinge states were observed.

FIG. 9.

Electrical circuit realizations of topological and quantum systems. (a) Square-root topological lattice experiment showcasing higher-order Weyl semi-metallic phases.431 [Adapted with permission from Song et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 5601 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Type-II Weyl points in a 3D circuit with tilted bands.168 [Adapted with permission from Li et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. 8(7), nwaa192 (2021). Copyright 2021 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Interaction-induced two-boson flat-band localization and topological edge states simulated on a 2D circuit array.432 [Adapted with permission from Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 035152 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (d) Simulation of Wilson fermions in an electrical circuit, with the measurement of chiral edge currents along the domain walls of the associated Chern lattice model.433 [Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 211 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (e) 3D circuit realization and measurement of the Hopf insulator model.434 [Adapted with permission from Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 057201 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (f) Observation of non-Abelian Anderson localization and transitions through site-resolved impedance spectra and time-domain voltage dynamics.435 [Adapted with permission from Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, 144203 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (g) Demonstration of topological states and their spectral flows at disclinations, showcasing the correspondence between real-space topology and disclination states.436 [Adapted with permission from Xie et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, 134118 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (h) Simulation of many-body bound states in the continuum and their boundary-localized behavior in a non-linear circuit network.104 [Adapted with permission from Sun et al., Commun. Phys. 7, 299 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (i) Circuit realization of the octupole higher-order topological insulating model and the observation of their corner states.437 [Adapted with permission from Qiu et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. nwaf137 (published online) (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (j) Non-Hermitian Haldane circuit exhibiting valley-dependent Dirac cones.438 [Adapted with permission from Xie et al., Nat. Commun. 16, 1627 (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (k) Circuit realization of topological states in 1D, 2D, and 3D that are delocalized by the NHSE.439 [Reprinted from Lin et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 173104 (2024), with the permission of AIP Publishing LLC.] (l) Fractal circuits with a proliferation of topological boundary modes.440 [Adapted with permission from He et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 235406 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (m) Emulation of quantum braiding operations using classical circuits.441 [Adapted with permission from Zou et al., Adv. Intell. Syst. 5(11), 2300354 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (n) Emulation of a quantum two-player game through a classical circuit.442 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Research 7, 0480 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (o) Integrated circuit (IC) realization of a topological Kitaev lattice with very high operating frequencies.131 [Adapted with permission from Iizuka et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 279 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.].

FIG. 9.

Electrical circuit realizations of topological and quantum systems. (a) Square-root topological lattice experiment showcasing higher-order Weyl semi-metallic phases.431 [Adapted with permission from Song et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 5601 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Type-II Weyl points in a 3D circuit with tilted bands.168 [Adapted with permission from Li et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. 8(7), nwaa192 (2021). Copyright 2021 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (c) Interaction-induced two-boson flat-band localization and topological edge states simulated on a 2D circuit array.432 [Adapted with permission from Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 035152 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (d) Simulation of Wilson fermions in an electrical circuit, with the measurement of chiral edge currents along the domain walls of the associated Chern lattice model.433 [Adapted with permission from Yang et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 211 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (e) 3D circuit realization and measurement of the Hopf insulator model.434 [Adapted with permission from Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 057201 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (f) Observation of non-Abelian Anderson localization and transitions through site-resolved impedance spectra and time-domain voltage dynamics.435 [Adapted with permission from Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, 144203 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (g) Demonstration of topological states and their spectral flows at disclinations, showcasing the correspondence between real-space topology and disclination states.436 [Adapted with permission from Xie et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, 134118 (2023). Copyright 2023 American Physical Society.] (h) Simulation of many-body bound states in the continuum and their boundary-localized behavior in a non-linear circuit network.104 [Adapted with permission from Sun et al., Commun. Phys. 7, 299 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (i) Circuit realization of the octupole higher-order topological insulating model and the observation of their corner states.437 [Adapted with permission from Qiu et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. nwaf137 (published online) (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (j) Non-Hermitian Haldane circuit exhibiting valley-dependent Dirac cones.438 [Adapted with permission from Xie et al., Nat. Commun. 16, 1627 (2025). Copyright 2025 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (k) Circuit realization of topological states in 1D, 2D, and 3D that are delocalized by the NHSE.439 [Reprinted from Lin et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 173104 (2024), with the permission of AIP Publishing LLC.] (l) Fractal circuits with a proliferation of topological boundary modes.440 [Adapted with permission from He et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 235406 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (m) Emulation of quantum braiding operations using classical circuits.441 [Adapted with permission from Zou et al., Adv. Intell. Syst. 5(11), 2300354 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (n) Emulation of a quantum two-player game through a classical circuit.442 [Adapted with permission from Zhang et al., Research 7, 0480 (2024). Copyright 2024 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (o) Integrated circuit (IC) realization of a topological Kitaev lattice with very high operating frequencies.131 [Adapted with permission from Iizuka et al., Commun. Phys. 6, 279 (2023). Copyright 2023 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.].

Close modal

Electrical circuits are also useful in demonstrating unconventional band structures, particularly in higher dimensions where fabrication may be challenging for some other metamaterials. For instance, Weyl points are crossings in 3D band structures and can tilt over to form type-II Weyl points,51,69–71,114,412,443–447 exhibiting great sensitivity during the so-called Lifshitz transition. Li et al.168 experimentally demonstrated type-II Weyl points in their 3D circuit [Fig. 9(b)]. By exciting bulk states and measuring node voltages, topological surface states were measured, exhibiting tilted bands with two group velocities in the same direction—key properties of type-II Weyl systems.448 

Beyond band structures, 2D or 3D electrical circuit arrays can also simulate few-body physics and other phenomena. By mapping the 2-photon degrees of freedom onto a 2D lattice,48,299,449 Zhou et al.432 simulated interaction-induced flat-band localizations and topological edge states, tuning the effective interaction strength through circuit grounding. By measuring impedance responses and voltage dynamics in the time domain, they were able to resolve two-boson flatbands and topological edge states [Fig. 9(c)]. On a different note, Yang et al.433 simulated Wilson fermions—a lattice discretization conventionally used in the context of lattice QCD to avoid fermion doubling—in a circuit lattice, tuning circuit parameters to achieve different Wilson fermion states. Through impedance measurements, they reconstructed the chiral edge domain wall separating two circuits with contrasting fractional Chern numbers and observed localized corner states arising from two Chern lattices with opposite chiralities [Fig. 9(d)]. Wang et al.434 realized the elusive Hopf insulator in a 3D electrical circuit systematically implemented with so-called pseudospin modules. Although this lattice required long-range spin–orbit couplings, the pseudospin modules aided the realization of Hopf bands, including both surface and bulk bands [Fig. 9(e)].

Electrical circuits have also been used to simulate non-Abelian systems, in which physical outcomes depend on the sequence of operations, i.e., twists.450–455 Various recent experiments have attempted to classically simulate operations that are mathematically equivalent to that experienced by anyonic quasiparticles.456–461 Wang et al.435 demonstrated non-Abelian Anderson localization using a 2D electrical circuit that represents the quasiperiodic AAH model with non-Abelian gauge fields. Both localization and delocalization behaviors were observed through site-resolved impedance spectra and voltage dynamics [Fig. 9(f)] (also see the experimental realization of non-Abelian inverse Anderson transition in Ref. 462).

Circuits are also particularly suitable for demonstrating the effects of lattice defects, since nodes are connected at will. Xie et al.436 experimentally demonstrated disclination states and their correspondence to real-space topology. Localized topological states at the disclinations—defects in rotational symmetry463—were observed in impedance maps and voltage distributions at the lattice nodes [Fig. 9(g)] (also see Refs. 464–466).

The notion of bound states in the continuum (BICs),467 which are localized and isolated from the environment, is rapidly extending beyond photonics,468–470 ring resonators,471 and into electrical circuits.428,458,472 Sun et al.104 simulated boundary-localized many-body BICs by mapping the Fock states of three bosons into non-linear circuit networks. The three circuit nodes corresponding to the three bosonic states are connected by capacitors, and each node consists of a self-feedback module controlling the effective interaction strength. These modules, which involve op-amps and analog multipliers, allow for the simulation of few-boson BICs with different effective interaction strengths [Fig. 9(h)].

Blessed with the freedom in implementing any desired boundary condition, electrical circuit arrays can assume unconventional boundary conditions not possible in materials and most metamaterials, such as higher-dimensional real projective planes or even non-orientable manifolds, with the exception of some photonic systems.473 Combined with nontrivial momentum-space higher-order topology arising from the octupole moment of the bulk, Qiu et al.437 experimentally demonstrated a 3D lattice [Fig. 9(i)], which exhibits defect-like higher-order corner states through impedance analysis. The versatility of electrical circuit has enabled the realization of such unconventional states resulting from the interplay of non-trivial real-space and momentum-space topology.47,474

Since electrical circuits commonly involve resistive and active elements, they can readily demonstrate how non-Hermiticity interplays with topology without much additional complication. Xie et al.438 demonstrated the non-Hermitian version of the graphene lattice, which exhibits two non-Hermitian Dirac cones, one experiencing amplification and the other experiencing decay. Site-resolved band measurements reveal unidirectional kink states475,476 with dissimilar profiles at the two valleys [Fig. 9(j)]. Involving asymmetrical real next-nearest-neighbor couplings effectively results in a non-Hermitian single Dirac cone, leading to valley polarization477–480 with a large bandwidth (see also Ref. 481).

The introduction of non-Hermiticity can also greatly alter the locality of topological modes. While topological modes are typically strongly confined to the boundaries,30 non-Hermitian skin pumping in the opposite direction can delocalize them while preserving their eigenspectrum, in this case midgap zero-eigenvalues.482 These delocalized topological states, still protected by lattice symmetries, can extend through the bulk, enabling their robustness to be harnessed not only at the boundaries but also within the bulk.483,484 Lin et al.439 demonstrated these extended states in 1D, 2D, and 3D circuits by tuning the non-reciprocal coupling strength [Fig. 9(k)]. At a critical strength determined by both the topological and skin localization length, the topological modes become extended, a phenomenon that was also studied in Refs. 38 and 485–488.

Beyond hyperbolic lattices (refer to Sec. IV C), electrical circuits can also simulate more esoteric network structures, such as fractals. On such networks, boundary terminations occur at various length scales, and topological modes localized unconventionally in the form of extended bulk states and inner states.404,489–492 He et al.440 demonstrated fractal topological circuits, which exhibit a rich spectrum of topological edge and corner modes. Reminiscent of hyperbolic lattices, the numbers of such boundary modes increase rapidly with system size, as directly observed through impedance analysis [Fig. 9(l)].

Topolectrical circuits can simulate not only classical systems but also quantum setups.493–495 By mapping the Hilbert space of few-qubit systems to the nodes of suitably designed circuits, Zou et al.441 demonstrated [Fig. 9(m)] the mathematical equivalences of Majorana-like edge states, T-junctions, two-qubit unitary operations, and Grover’s search algorithm. Through their resistor-capacitor-based circuit with segmented fixed resistances, braiding processes can be simulated without significant loss. Zhang et al.442 demonstrated another example of quantum algorithm simulation using classical circuits. They simulated a two-player quantum game based on AND-OR tree structures [Fig. 9(n)]. Relays were employed to disconnect each node simultaneously after applying the initial voltage, allowing the system to evolve from the initial state.

Although most topolectrical circuit simulations of condensed matter have been built on printed circuit boards, a few experiments have demonstrated their implementation in integrated circuits (ICs). For instance, Iizuka et al.131 experimentally demonstrated topological Kitaev interface states496 in high-frequency ICs [Fig. 9(o)]. Through two-point impedance measurements, this IC realization successfully captured both topological and trivial phases at frequencies around 13 GHz. These IC realizations, with their much higher degree of miniaturization, demonstrate the great potential for topolectrical circuits in scalable high-frequency applications.

1. Nodal knots and topological drumhead surface states

While various experiments have simulated knotted band touchings in 3D parameter space, in both Hermitian and non-Hermitian (exceptional knots) contexts,105,204,497 realizing these knots in momentum space has the benefit of accessing their topological surface states at real-space terminations. Electrical circuits prove particularly suitable due to the ease in implementing long-range couplings, which are essential for the construction of nodal knots in momentum space.60,178,193,196,215,217,498–501 In general, the topological surface states of nodal knots lie within the interior of the 2-dimensional surface Brillouin zone projections of these knots, and are thus known as “drumhead” surface states.60 

Following Ref. 502, we describe the construction of nodal knot models that are suitable for platforms with reciprocal elements, i.e., passive RLC circuits. In a reciprocal lattice with two nodes per unit cell, a minimal circuit Laplacian ansatz can be written as
(22)
where l0 imposes a uniform offset, f(k) is a complex function of the lattice momentum, and σx and σz are Pauli matrices. The bands cross in the 3D Brillouin zone where 2|f(k)| = 0, i.e., when the coefficients of both Pauli matrices disappear. To facilitate the knot construction, kT3 is first mapped onto two complex numbers (z, w),
(23)
such that different knots correspond to different bivariate polynomials in z, w: for instance, the (p, q)-torus knots correspond to f(k) = z(k)p + w(k)q.502 Such polynomials were already devised for various knots,503–505 but their embedding onto the 3D Brillouin zone, where z(k), w(k) are both periodic functions of k, has only been considered in the topological nodal context.

As simulated and experimentally demonstrated in Ref. 502, nodal structures can be resolved from the admittance eigenvalues [Fig. 10(a)]. These nodal knots form intricate patterns in the 3D momentum space, while the corresponding drumhead surface states appear as projected flatbands in the surface admittance spectrum. While the edge-terminated direction was implemented in real space, the two other directions in the plane of the drumhead surface states were parametrically tuned by adjusting the inductance of the inductors to correspond to different momentum values [Fig. 10(b)]. The inductance was varied using ferrite rods or shorted wire loops to increase or decrease inductance, respectively [Fig. 10(c)], effectively reducing the undesired effects of parasitic and component uncertainties. By utilizing machine learning-powered optimization and microcontrollers to fine-tune the setup, the drumhead regions could be resolved with a minimal number of measurements [Fig. 10(d)].

FIG. 10.

Imaging nodal knots through electrical circuits. (a) Nodal knot construction from the method in Ref. 502 [Eqs. (22) and (23)]: theoretical nodal links or knots are shown in orange, with simulated admittance eigenvalues represented as black points in 3D momentum space. (b) A unit cell of the experimental circuit featuring variable inductors (cylinders). (c) Mechanism behind the variable inductors: ferrite rods increase the inductance and a shorted wire loop decreases it by up to 25% and 50%, respectively. (d) The simulated drumhead region impedance of the Hopf link (left) agrees well with measurements at optimally chosen momentum points (right). [(a)–(d) adapted with permission from Lee et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 4385 (2020). Copyright 2020 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.].

FIG. 10.

Imaging nodal knots through electrical circuits. (a) Nodal knot construction from the method in Ref. 502 [Eqs. (22) and (23)]: theoretical nodal links or knots are shown in orange, with simulated admittance eigenvalues represented as black points in 3D momentum space. (b) A unit cell of the experimental circuit featuring variable inductors (cylinders). (c) Mechanism behind the variable inductors: ferrite rods increase the inductance and a shorted wire loop decreases it by up to 25% and 50%, respectively. (d) The simulated drumhead region impedance of the Hopf link (left) agrees well with measurements at optimally chosen momentum points (right). [(a)–(d) adapted with permission from Lee et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 4385 (2020). Copyright 2020 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.].

Close modal

Topolectrical circuit simulation of a condensed matter lattice usually entails the design, construction, and voltage measurement of a large number of nodes. To streamline the process, some studies have employed machine learning (ML) approaches, in particular deep learning, for optimizing their design and measurement process. In other contexts, ML approaches have already proven themselves as powerful tools for optimization and prediction based on incomplete information, for instance extrapolating the dynamics of complex systems and optimizing their design.506–508 As such, they are particularly effective in addressing practical challenges such as managing a large number of circuit variables, designing printed circuit boards with minimal effective node-to-node connections, and streamlining circuit measurements.

To illustrate, fully acquiring the Laplacian spectrum of a circuit requires N × N impedance measurements in principle, where N is the total number of nodes. For large N, this process becomes increasingly tedious, especially in higher-dimensional circuits. To address this, Shang et al.169 introduced the physics-graph-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing the circuit spectrum with incomplete data [Fig. 11(a1)], toward a similar objective as Ref. 128. Using physics-graph-informed ML, they conclusively demonstrated second-order NHSE spectra through impedance measurements only between selected ports [Figs. 11(a2) and 11(a3)]. Aided by the K-means clusters algorithm, only N2/K measurements were required, highlighting how embedding physics-informed priors into ML frameworks can significantly enhance data interpretation and analysis in topolectrical circuit experiments.

FIG. 11.

Applying machine learning to topolectrical circuit experiments. (a) Application of the physics-graph-informed machine learning approach in streamlining the measurement of the second-order non-Hermitian skin effect in a 2D circuit, and the determination of its eigenspectrum.169 [Adapted with permission from Shang et al., Adv. Sci. 9(36), 2202922 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Application of deep learning to the design of the topological model for a circuit realization.509 [Adapted with permission from Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 094103 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (c) Design of electrical circuits based on text or image inputs, experimentally tested with a 2D topological circuit.510 [Adapted with permission from Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 110, 134108 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.].

FIG. 11.

Applying machine learning to topolectrical circuit experiments. (a) Application of the physics-graph-informed machine learning approach in streamlining the measurement of the second-order non-Hermitian skin effect in a 2D circuit, and the determination of its eigenspectrum.169 [Adapted with permission from Shang et al., Adv. Sci. 9(36), 2202922 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under CC BY 4.0.] (b) Application of deep learning to the design of the topological model for a circuit realization.509 [Adapted with permission from Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 109, 094103 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.] (c) Design of electrical circuits based on text or image inputs, experimentally tested with a 2D topological circuit.510 [Adapted with permission from Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 110, 134108 (2024). Copyright 2024 American Physical Society.].

Close modal

In addition to data analysis, deep learning can aid the design of the mathematical model itself. Chen et al.509 utilized multilayer perceptrons and convolutional neural networks to predict topological invariants and the circuit response. They simulated the topolectrical Chern circuit40 [Fig. 11(b1)] with 1000 different sets of circuit component parameters to train their model. The topolectrical Chern circuit features chiral voltage edge propagation when a Gaussian pulse is injected at an edge node [Fig. 11(b2)]. Their trained model demonstrated the approximate phase diagram [Fig. 11(b3)] and captured aspects of the temporal evolution of chiral voltage propagation, even in the presence of defects [Fig. 11(b4)].

Chen et al.510 proposed a framework that integrates text, image, and spectral data to assist in the design of two-dimensional SSH circuits. Their bidirectional collaborative design framework enables both forward prediction of measured quantities from the described circuit structure and inverse design of topolectrical circuits based on textual descriptions. For instance, when provided with an image of a fabricated 2D SSH circuit [Fig. 11(c1)], the trained model inferred circuit properties that aligned with experimental measurements [Fig. 11(c2)]. Conversely, given a target voltage profile {e.g., edge-localized voltage [Fig. 11(c3)]}, the model suggested a corresponding circuit design [Fig. 11(c4)]. The fabricated circuit based on this predicted structure exhibited a voltage profile similar to the intended design.

Electrical circuits, utilizing components such as conventional elements, varactors, op-amps, analog multipliers, and memristors,511,512 enable the realization of features and phenomena that are hard to simulate in most other platforms, such as higher-order topological phases,78,513 Floquet setups,101,136 hyperbolic lattices,514 and synthetic dimensions.515 Recent advances have expanded the scope of electrical circuit experiments to include the simulation of flatbands,516,517 interaction-induced relativistic effects,518 quantum valley Hall effects,519 exceptional Landau quantization,520 Hopf bundles,521 inverse Anderson transitions,522 and non-Abelian topological bound states,523 offering unprecedented control and tunability. These demonstrations highlight the adaptability of topolectrical circuits in bridging theoretical models with physical realizations. Their direct observability and scalability present unique opportunities for uncovering new physics. Furthermore, machine learning and deep learning have enhanced the potential of electrical circuits, enabling their efficient analysis, prediction, and design, even in systems with complicated topological features or incomplete data.169 

The integration of electrical circuits with advanced computational techniques and emerging technologies524 promises to deepen our understanding of condensed matter phenomena and push the boundaries of experimental physics.145,146,525 Their adaptability62,502 to simulate higher-dimensional systems,50 such as those seen in magic-angle Moiré circuits,526 opens new avenues for investigating uncharted areas, including relatively esoteric condensed matter systems.92,527–532

Potential future directions in topolectrical circuits include the integration of tunable active elements, such as digitally controlled inductors and analog multipliers, enabling real-time parameter adjustments for Floquet circuit implementations. Although not yet widely available commercially, memristors—often considered the fourth passive circuit element512,533,534 alongside capacitors, inductors, and resistors—could facilitate memory-based physical phenomena such as axon-like transmissions535 or protected topological states even with a broken symmetry.511 The incorporation of other nonlinear elements, such as transistors and various types of diodes, remains an open avenue that could simplify circuit implementations and broaden potential applications. These advancements may transition topolectrical circuits from proof-of-concept research to real-world applications in signal processing, computation, and sensing. Further refinement and expansion of the scope of topolectrical circuits could lead to uncovering fundamental insights and advance the development of practical applications in condensed matter and beyond.

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education (MOE) under Tier-II Grant Nos. MOE-T2EP50121-0014 (NUS Grant No. A-8000086-01-00) and MOE-T2EP50222-0003 (NUS Grant No. A-8001542-00-00), as well as MOE Tier-I FRC Grants (NUS Grant Nos. A-8000195-01-00 and A-8002656-00-00).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Haydar Sahin: Conceptualization (equal); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Mansoor B. A. Jalil: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Ching Hua Lee: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
X.
Ni
,
S.
Yves
,
A.
Krasnok
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Topological metamaterials
,”
Chem. Rev.
123
,
7585
(
2023
).
2.
L. M.
Nash
,
D.
Kleckner
,
A.
Read
,
V.
Vitelli
,
A. M.
Turner
, and
W. T. M.
Irvine
, “
Topological mechanics of gyroscopic metamaterials
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
112
,
14495
(
2015
).
3.
S.
Zheng
,
G.
Duan
, and
B.
Xia
, “
Progress in topological mechanics
,”
Appl. Sci.
12
,
1987
(
2022
).
4.
A.
Wang
,
Z.
Meng
, and
C. Q.
Chen
, “
Non-Hermitian topology in static mechanical metamaterials
,”
Sci. Adv.
9
,
eadf7299
(
2023
).
5.
G.
Ma
,
M.
Xiao
, and
C. T.
Chan
, “
Topological phases in acoustic and mechanical systems
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
1
,
281
(
2019
).
6.
H.
Xue
,
Y.
Yang
, and
B.
Zhang
, “
Topological acoustics
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
7
,
974
(
2022
).
7.
H.
Xue
,
Y.
Yang
,
G.
Liu
,
F.
Gao
,
Y.
Chong
, and
B.
Zhang
, “
Realization of an acoustic third-order topological insulator
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
244301
(
2019
).
8.
C.
He
,
S.-Y.
Yu
,
H.
Wang
,
H.
Ge
,
J.
Ruan
,
H.
Zhang
,
M.-H.
Lu
, and
Y.-F.
Chen
, “
Hybrid acoustic topological insulator in three dimensions
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
195503
(
2019
).
9.
Y.
Ding
,
Y.
Peng
,
Y.
Zhu
,
X.
Fan
,
J.
Yang
,
B.
Liang
,
X.
Zhu
,
X.
Wan
, and
J.
Cheng
, “
Experimental demonstration of acoustic Chern insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
014302
(
2019
).
10.
Q.
Wei
,
X.
Zhang
,
W.
Deng
,
J.
Lu
,
X.
Huang
,
M.
Yan
,
G.
Chen
,
Z.
Liu
, and
S.
Jia
, “
Higher-order topological semimetal in acoustic crystals
,”
Nat. Mater.
20
,
812
(
2021
).
11.
A. B.
Khanikaev
,
S.
Hossein Mousavi
,
W.-K.
Tse
,
M.
Kargarian
,
A. H.
MacDonald
, and
G.
Shvets
, “
Photonic topological insulators
,”
Nat. Mater.
12
,
233
(
2013
).
12.
L.
Lu
,
J. D.
Joannopoulos
, and
M.
Soljačić
, “
Topological photonics
,”
Nat. Photonics
8
,
821
(
2014
).
13.
T.
Ozawa
,
H. M.
Price
,
A.
Amo
,
N.
Goldman
,
M.
Hafezi
,
L.
Lu
,
M. C.
Rechtsman
,
D.
Schuster
,
J.
Simon
,
O.
Zilberberg
, and
I.
Carusotto
, “
Topological photonics
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
91
,
015006
(
2019
).
14.
R. E.
Aitchison
, “
Resistance between adjacent points of Liebman mesh
,”
Am. J. Phys.
32
,
566
(
1964
).
15.
F. J.
Bartis
, “
Let’s analyze the resistance lattice
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
354
(
1967
).
16.
S.
Kirkpatrick
, “
Percolation and conduction
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
45
,
574
(
1973
).
17.
J.
Cserti
, “
Application of the lattice Green’s function for calculating the resistance of an infinite network of resistors
,”
Am. J. Phys.
68
,
896
(
2000
).
18.
F. Y.
Wu
, “
Theory of resistor networks: The two-point resistance
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
37
,
6653
(
2004
).
19.
W. J.
Tzeng
and
F. Y.
Wu
, “
Theory of impedance networks: The two-point impedance and LC resonances
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
39
,
8579
(
2006
).
20.
J.
Cserti
,
G.
Széchenyi
, and
G.
Dávid
, “
Uniform tiling with electrical resistors
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
44
,
215201
(
2011
).
21.
M.
Mamode
, “
Laplacian operator and its square lattice discretization: Green function vs. lattice Green function for the flat 2-torus and other related 2D manifolds
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
57
,
405201
(
2024
).
22.
F.
Perrier
and
F.
Girault
, “
Leading two-point resistances from transfer matrices in cylindrical, spider web, axial and grid resistor networks
,”
Phys. Scr.
99
,
125009
(
2024
).
23.
Z.-Z.
Tan
, “
Recursion-transform method for computing resistance of the complex resistor network with three arbitrary boundaries
,”
Phys. Rev. E
91
,
052122
(
2015
).
24.
M.
Mamode
, “
Electrical resistance between pairs of vertices of a conducting cube and continuum limit for a cubic resistor network
,”
J. Phys. Commun.
1
,
035002
(
2017
).
25.
C. H.
Lee
,
S.
Imhof
,
C.
Berger
,
F.
Bayer
,
J.
Brehm
,
L. W.
Molenkamp
,
T.
Kiessling
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Topolectrical circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
1
,
39
(
2018
).
26.
J.
Ningyuan
,
C.
Owens
,
A.
Sommer
,
D.
Schuster
, and
J.
Simon
, “
Time- and site-resolved dynamics in a topological circuit
,”
Phys. Rev. X
5
,
021031
(
2015
).
27.
V. V.
Albert
,
L. I.
Glazman
, and
L.
Jiang
, “
Topological properties of linear circuit lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
114
,
173902
(
2015
).
28.
X.-L.
Qi
and
S.-C.
Zhang
, “
Topological insulators and superconductors
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
83
,
1057
(
2011
).
29.
C. L.
Kane
and
E. J.
Mele
, “
Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
95
,
146802
(
2005
).
30.
M. Z.
Hasan
and
C. L.
Kane
, “
Colloquium: Topological insulators
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
82
,
3045
(
2010
).
31.
J. E.
Moore
and
L.
Balents
, “
Topological invariants of time-reversal-invariant band structures
,”
Phys. Rev. B
75
,
121306
(
2007
).
32.
H.
Zhang
,
C.-X.
Liu
,
X.-L.
Qi
,
X.
Dai
,
Z.
Fang
, and
S.-C.
Zhang
, “
Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface
,”
Nat. Phys.
5
,
438
(
2009
).
33.
B. A.
Bernevig
,
T. L.
Hughes
, and
S.-C.
Zhang
, “
Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells
,”
Science
314
,
1757
(
2006
).
34.
L.
Fu
,
C. L.
Kane
, and
E. J.
Mele
, “
Topological insulators in three dimensions
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
98
,
106803
(
2007
).
35.
M. Z.
Hasan
and
J. E.
Moore
, “
Three-dimensional topological insulators
,”
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
2
,
55
(
2011
).
36.
C. H.
Lee
and
X.-L.
Qi
, “
Lattice construction of pseudopotential Hamiltonians for fractional Chern insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. B
90
,
085103
(
2014
).
37.
F.
Schindler
,
A. M.
Cook
,
M. G.
Vergniory
,
Z.
Wang
,
S. S. P.
Parkin
,
B. A.
Bernevig
, and
T.
Neupert
, “
Higher-order topological insulators
,”
Sci. Adv.
4
,
eaat0346
(
2018
).
38.
J.
Ferdous
,
C.
Yuce
,
A.
Alù
, and
H.
Ramezani
, “
Observation of robust zero-energy extended states
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
19
,
L061002
(
2023
).
39.
T.
Helbig
,
T.
Hofmann
,
C. H.
Lee
,
R.
Thomale
,
S.
Imhof
,
L. W.
Molenkamp
, and
T.
Kiessling
, “
Band structure engineering and reconstruction in electric circuit networks
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
161114
(
2019
).
40.
T.
Hofmann
,
T.
Helbig
,
C. H.
Lee
,
M.
Greiter
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Chiral voltage propagation and calibration in a topolectrical Chern circuit
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
247702
(
2019
).
41.
R.
Haenel
,
T.
Branch
, and
M.
Franz
, “
Chern insulators for electromagnetic waves in electrical circuit networks
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
235110
(
2019
).
42.
J.
Dong
,
V.
Juričić
, and
B.
Roy
, “
Topolectric circuits: Theory and construction
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
3
,
023056
(
2021
).
43.
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Wang
,
N. C.
Hu
,
J. Y.
Lin
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Topological corner modes in a brick lattice with nonsymmorphic symmetry
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
035142
(
2020
).
44.
T.
Yoshida
,
T.
Mizoguchi
, and
Y.
Hatsugai
, “
Mirror skin effect and its electric circuit simulation
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
022062
(
2020
).
45.
S.
Imhof
,
C.
Berger
,
F.
Bayer
,
J.
Brehm
,
L. W.
Molenkamp
,
T.
Kiessling
,
F.
Schindler
,
C. H.
Lee
,
M.
Greiter
,
T.
Neupert
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Topolectrical-circuit realization of topological corner modes
,”
Nat. Phys.
14
,
925
(
2018
).
46.
T.
Helbig
,
T.
Hofmann
,
S.
Imhof
,
M.
Abdelghany
,
T.
Kiessling
,
L. W.
Molenkamp
,
C. H.
Lee
,
A.
Szameit
,
M.
Greiter
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Nat. Phys.
16
,
747
(
2020
).
47.
J.
Bao
,
D.
Zou
,
W.
Zhang
,
W.
He
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Topoelectrical circuit octupole insulator with topologically protected corner states
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
201406
(
2019
).
48.
N. A.
Olekhno
,
E. I.
Kretov
,
A. A.
Stepanenko
,
P. A.
Ivanova
,
V. V.
Yaroshenko
,
E. M.
Puhtina
,
D. S.
Filonov
,
B.
Cappello
,
L.
Matekovits
, and
M. A.
Gorlach
, “
Topological edge states of interacting photon pairs emulated in a topolectrical circuit
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
1436
(
2020
).
49.
H.
Yang
,
Z.-X.
Li
,
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Observation of symmetry-protected zero modes in topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
022028
(
2020
).
50.
Y.
Wang
,
H. M.
Price
,
B.
Zhang
, and
Y. D.
Chong
, “
Circuit implementation of a four-dimensional topological insulator
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
2356
(
2020
).
51.
Y.
Lu
,
N.
Jia
,
L.
Su
,
C.
Owens
,
G.
Juzeliūnas
,
D. I.
Schuster
, and
J.
Simon
, “
Probing the Berry curvature and Fermi arcs of a Weyl circuit
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
020302
(
2019
).
52.
M.
Serra-Garcia
,
R.
Süsstrunk
, and
S. D.
Huber
, “
Observation of quadrupole transitions and edge mode topology in an LC circuit network
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
020304
(
2019
).
53.
Y.
Yang
,
D.
Zhu
,
Z.
Hang
, and
Y.
Chong
, “
Observation of antichiral edge states in a circuit lattice
,”
Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron.
64
,
257011
(
2021
).
54.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
System size dependent topological zero modes in coupled topolectrical chains
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
075158
(
2022
).
55.
E.
Zhao
, “
Topological circuits of inductors and capacitors
,”
Ann. Phys.
399
,
289
(
2018
).
56.
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Sun
,
W.
Zhu
,
Z.
Guo
,
J.
Jiang
,
T.
Kariyado
,
H.
Chen
, and
X.
Hu
, “
Topological LC-circuits based on microstrips and observation of electromagnetic modes with orbital angular momentum
,”
Nat. Commun.
9
,
4598
(
2018
).
57.
Z.-Q.
Zhang
,
B.-L.
Wu
,
J.
Song
, and
H.
Jiang
, “
Topological Anderson insulator in electric circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
184202
(
2019
).
58.
S.
Liu
,
S.
Ma
,
Q.
Zhang
,
L.
Zhang
,
C.
Yang
,
O.
You
,
W.
Gao
,
Y.
Xiang
,
T. J.
Cui
, and
S.
Zhang
, “
Octupole corner state in a three-dimensional topological circuit
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
9
,
145
(
2020
).
59.
W.
Zhang
,
D.
Zou
,
Q.
Pei
,
W.
He
,
J.
Bao
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Experimental observation of higher-order topological Anderson insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
126
,
146802
(
2021
).
60.
K.
Luo
,
R.
Yu
, and
H.
Weng
, “
Topological nodal states in circuit lattice
,”
Research
2018
,
6793752
.
61.
S.
Liu
,
S.
Ma
,
R.
Shao
,
L.
Zhang
,
B.
Yang
,
M.
Navarro-Cía
,
T. J.
Cui
, and
S.
Zhang
, “
Edge state mimicking topological behavior in a one-dimensional electrical circuit
,”
New J. Phys.
23
,
103005
(
2021
).
62.
K.
Yatsugi
,
T.
Yoshida
,
T.
Mizoguchi
,
Y.
Kuno
,
H.
Iizuka
,
Y.
Tadokoro
, and
Y.
Hatsugai
, “
Observation of bulk-edge correspondence in topological pumping based on a tunable electric circuit
,”
Commun. Phys.
5
,
180
(
2022
).
63.
N. A.
Olekhno
,
A. D.
Rozenblit
,
V. I.
Kachin
,
A. A.
Dmitriev
,
O. I.
Burmistrov
,
P. S.
Seregin
,
D. V.
Zhirihin
, and
M. A.
Gorlach
, “
Experimental realization of topological corner states in long-range-coupled electrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
L081107
(
2022
).
64.
Y.
Liu
,
H.
Yang
,
X. S.
Wang
,
Z.-X.
Li
, and
Y.
Cao
, “
Observation of symmetry-protected corner states in breathing honeycomb topolectrical circuits
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
131
,
094903
(
2022
).
65.
H.
Yang
,
L.
Song
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Observation of type-III corner states induced by long-range interactions
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
075427
(
2022
).
66.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Type-II corner modes in topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
245128
(
2022
).
67.
S.
Guo
,
J.
Huang
,
R.
Huang
,
S.
Su
,
Z.
Lin
, and
W.
Qiu
, “
Observation of the corner state in three-dimensional pyrochlore topological electric circuits
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
56
,
505305
(
2023
).
68.
X.
Zheng
,
T.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Topolectrical circuit realization of quadrupolar surface semimetals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
035308
(
2022
).
69.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Chiral surface and Hinge states in higher-order Weyl semimetallic circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
085430
(
2024
).
70.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z.
Bin Siu
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Topoelectrical circuit realization of a Weyl semimetal heterojunction
,”
Commun. Phys.
3
,
72
(
2020
).
71.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Anti-Klein tunneling in topoelectrical Weyl semimetal circuits
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
116
,
111904
(
2020
).
72.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
C.
Sun
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Realization of Weyl semimetal phases in topoelectrical circuits
,”
New J. Phys.
22
,
023025
(
2020
).
73.
H.
Yang
,
L.
Song
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Experimental realization of two-dimensional weak topological insulators
,”
Nano Lett.
22
,
3125
(
2022
).
74.
A.
Pal
and
A. K.
Ghosh
, “
Multi higher-order Dirac and Weyl semimetals
,” (
2024
).
75.
H.
Sahin
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Interfacial corner modes in a topolectrical heterojunction
,” in
APS March Meeting Abstracts
(
APS Meeting Abstracts
,
2022
), Vol.
2022
, p.
N70011
.
76.
H.
Sahin
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Unconventional hybridization of skin modes in coupled non-Hermitian chains
,” in
APS March Meeting Abstracts
(
APS Meeting Abstracts
,
2022
), Vol.
2022
, p.
N70013
.
77.
S.
Liu
,
R.
Shao
,
S.
Ma
,
L.
Zhang
,
O.
You
,
H.
Wu
,
Y. J.
Xiang
,
T. J.
Cui
, and
S.
Zhang
, “
Non-Hermitian skin effect in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit
,”
Research
2021
,
1
.
78.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Electric circuits for non-Hermitian Chern insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
081401
(
2019
).
79.
D.
Halder
,
R.
Thomale
, and
S.
Basu
, “
Circuit realization of a two-orbital non-Hermitian tight-binding chain
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
115407
(
2024
).
80.
L.
Su
,
H.
Jiang
,
Z.
Wang
,
S.
Chen
, and
D.
Zheng
, “
Simulation of non-Hermitian disordered systems in linear circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
184108
(
2023
).
81.
T.
Kotwal
,
F.
Moseley
,
A.
Stegmaier
,
S.
Imhof
,
H.
Brand
,
T.
Kießling
,
R.
Thomale
,
H.
Ronellenfitsch
, and
J.
Dunkel
, “
Active topolectrical circuits
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
118
,
e2106411118
(
2021
).
82.
Y.
Wang
,
L.-J.
Lang
,
C. H.
Lee
,
B.
Zhang
, and
Y. D.
Chong
, “
Topologically enhanced harmonic generation in a nonlinear transmission line metamaterial
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
1102
(
2019
).
83.
F.
Zangeneh-Nejad
and
R.
Fleury
, “
Nonlinear second-order topological insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
053902
(
2019
).
84.
J.
Wu
,
Z.
Wang
,
Y.
Biao
,
F.
Fei
,
S.
Zhang
,
Z.
Yin
,
Y.
Hu
,
Z.
Song
,
T.
Wu
,
F.
Song
, and
R.
Yu
, “
Non-Abelian gauge fields in circuit systems
,”
Nat. Electron.
5
,
635
(
2022
).
85.
N.
Pan
,
T.
Chen
,
T.
Ji
,
X.
Tong
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Three-dimensional non-Abelian Bloch oscillations and higher-order topological states
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
355
(
2023
).
86.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Electric circuits for universal quantum gates and quantum Fourier transformation
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
023278
(
2020
).
87.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Universal quantum gates, artificial neurons, and pattern recognition simulated by L C resonators
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
3
,
023051
(
2021
).
88.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Electric-circuit simulation of the Schrödinger equation and non-Hermitian quantum walks
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
165419
(
2019
).
89.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Topological Euler insulators and their electric circuit realization
,”
Phys. Rev. B
103
,
205303
(
2021
).
90.
H.
Sahin
,
Topolectrical Circuit Theory and Realizations of Topological, Non-linear, and Non-hermitian Phenomena
(
National University of Singapore
,
2024
); https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/249555.
91.
J.
Yao
,
X.
Hao
,
B.
Song
,
Y.
Jia
,
C.
Hua
, and
M.
Zhou
, “
Multi-orbital topolectrical circuit for topological quantum states
,”
Nano Futures
6
,
021001
(
2022
).
92.
J.
Huang
,
S.
Guo
,
S.
Qiu
,
F.
Zhuang
,
S.
Su
,
R.
Huang
,
Z.
Lin
,
W.
Qiu
,
J.
Su
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Topological end states in one-dimensional Su–Schrieffer–Heeger-like chain electric circuits
,”
Phys. Scr.
99
,
035913
(
2024
).
93.
B.
Lv
,
R.
Chen
,
R.
Li
,
C.
Guan
,
B.
Zhou
,
G.
Dong
,
C.
Zhao
,
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Wang
,
H.
Tao
,
J.
Shi
, and
D.-H.
Xu
, “
Realization of quasicrystalline quadrupole topological insulators in electrical circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
4
,
108
(
2021
).
94.
X.
Shen
,
K.
Pan
,
X.
Wang
, and
X.
Zhou
, “
Observation of Klein bottle quadrupole topological insulators in electric circuits
,” (
2024
).
95.
R.
Zhang
and
T.
Chen
, “
True exponentially enhanced sensing in the non-Hermitian topological phase
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
124
,
174002
(
2024
).
96.
H.
Yuan
,
W.
Zhang
,
Z.
Zhou
,
W.
Wang
,
N.
Pan
,
Y.
Feng
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Non-Hermitian topolectrical circuit sensor with high sensitivity
,”
Adv. Sci.
10
,
2301128
(
2023
).
97.
T.
Chen
,
D.
Zou
,
Z.
Zhou
,
R.
Wang
,
Y.
Feng
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Ultra-sensitivity in reconstructed exceptional systems
,”
Natl. Sci. Rev.
11
,
nwae278
(
2024
).
98.
T. S.
Rappaport
,
J. N.
Murdock
, and
F.
Gutierrez
, “
State of the art in 60-GHz integrated circuits and systems for wireless communications
,”
Proc. IEEE
99
,
1390
(
2011
).
99.
C.
Errando-Herranz
,
A. Y.
Takabayashi
,
P.
Edinger
,
H.
Sattari
,
K. B.
Gylfason
, and
N.
Quack
, “
MEMS for photonic integrated circuits
,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
26
,
1
(
2020
).
100.
X.
Zhang
,
B.
Zhang
,
W.
Zhao
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Observation of non-local impedance response in a passive electrical circuit
,”
SciPost Phys.
16
,
002
(
2024
).
101.
A.
Stegmaier
,
A.
Fritzsche
,
R.
Sorbello
,
M.
Greiter
,
H.
Brand
,
C.
Barko
,
M.
Hofer
,
U.
Schwingenschlögl
,
R.
Moessner
,
C. H.
Lee
,
A.
Szameit
,
A.
Alu
,
T.
Kießling
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Topological edge state nucleation in frequency space and its realization with floquet electrical circuits
,” (
2024
).
102.
A.
Stegmaier
,
H.
Brand
,
S.
Imhof
,
A.
Fritzsche
,
T.
Helbig
,
T.
Hofmann
,
I.
Boettcher
,
M.
Greiter
,
C. H.
Lee
,
G.
Bahl
,
A.
Szameit
,
T.
Kießling
,
R.
Thomale
, and
L. K.
Upreti
, “
Realizing efficient topological temporal pumping in electrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
6
,
023010
(
2024
).
103.
W.
Zhang
,
W.
Cao
,
L.
Qian
,
H.
Yuan
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Topolectrical space-time circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
16
,
198
(
2025
).
104.
N.
Sun
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Yuan
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Boundary-localized many-body bound states in the continuum
,”
Commun. Phys.
7
,
299
(
2024
).
105.
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Yuan
,
W.
Cao
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Exploring four-dimensional topological manifolds of non-Hermitian bands from Klein bottles to spun trefoil knots
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
224108
(
2024
).
106.
A.
Chen
,
H.
Brand
,
T.
Helbig
,
T.
Hofmann
,
S.
Imhof
,
A.
Fritzsche
,
T.
Kießling
,
A.
Stegmaier
,
L. K.
Upreti
,
T.
Neupert
,
T.
Bzdušek
,
M.
Greiter
,
R.
Thomale
, and
I.
Boettcher
, “
Hyperbolic matter in electrical circuits with tunable complex phases
,”
Nat. Commun.
14
,
622
(
2023
).
107.
LTspice, Analog Devices.
108.
PSpice, Cadence.
109.
Multisim, National Instruments.
110.
Modelithics, Modelithics, Inc..
111.
J. A.
Svoboda
and
R. C.
Dorf
,
Introduction to Electric Circuits
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2013
).
112.
M.
Tooley
,
Electronic circuits-fundamentals & Applications
(
Routledge
,
2007
).
113.
F.
Ulaby
,
Electromagnetics for Engineers
(
Pearson/Prentice Hall
,
2005
).
114.
X.
Zheng
,
T.
Chen
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Exploring topological phase transition and Weyl physics in five dimensions with electric circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
4
,
033203
(
2022
).
115.
A.
Stegmaier
,
S.
Imhof
,
T.
Helbig
,
T.
Hofmann
,
C. H.
Lee
,
M.
Kremer
,
A.
Fritzsche
,
T.
Feichtner
,
S.
Klembt
,
S.
Höfling
,
I.
Boettcher
,
I. C.
Fulga
,
L.
Ma
,
O. G.
Schmidt
,
M.
Greiter
,
T.
Kiessling
,
A.
Szameit
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Topological defect engineering and P T symmetry in non-hermitian electrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
126
,
215302
(
2021
).
116.
X.
Xie
,
G.
Liang
,
F.
Ma
,
Y.
Du
,
Y.
Peng
,
E.
Li
,
H.
Chen
,
L.
Li
,
F.
Gao
, and
H.
Xue
, “
Observation of scale-free localized states induced by non-Hermitian defects
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
L140102
(
2024
).
117.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
H.
Sahin
,
Z. B.
Siu
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Interfacial skin modes at a non-Hermitian heterojunction
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
4
,
043021
(
2022
).
118.
H.-X.
Wang
,
C.
Liang
,
Y.
Poo
,
P.-G.
Luan
, and
G.-Y.
Guo
, “
The topological edge modes and Tamm modes in Su–Schrieffer–Heeger LC-resonator circuits
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
54
,
435301
(
2021
).
119.
J.
Falck
,
C.
Felgemacher
,
A.
Rojko
,
M.
Liserre
, and
P.
Zacharias
, “
Reliability of power electronic systems: An industry perspective
,”
IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag.
12
,
24
(
2018
).
120.
M.
Watts
, “
High temperature circuit reliability testing
,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on High Temperature Electronics
(
Citeseer
,
Paris, France
,
2005
).
121.
N.
Baker
,
M.
Liserre
,
L.
Dupont
, and
Y.
Avenas
, “
Improved reliability of power modules: A review of online junction temperature measurement methods
,”
IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag.
8
,
17
(
2014
).
122.
H.
Wang
,
M.
Liserre
, and
F.
Blaabjerg
, “
Toward reliable power electronics: Challenges, design tools, and opportunities
,”
IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag.
7
,
17
(
2013
).
123.
Y.
Su
,
Y.
He
,
X.
Guo
,
W.
Xie
,
X.
Ji
,
H.
Wang
,
X.
Cai
,
L.
Tong
, and
S.
Yu
, “
Scalability of large-scale photonic integrated circuits
,”
ACS Photonics
10
,
2020
(
2023
).
124.
S.
Rumley
,
D.
Nikolova
,
R.
Hendry
,
Q.
Li
,
D.
Calhoun
, and
K.
Bergman
, “
Silicon photonics for exascale systems
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
33
,
547
(
2015
).
125.
J.
Wu
,
X.
Huang
,
Y.
Yang
,
W.
Deng
,
J.
Lu
,
W.
Deng
, and
Z.
Liu
, “
Non-Hermitian second-order topology induced by resistances in electric circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
195127
(
2022
).
126.
S.
Liu
,
S.
Ma
,
C.
Yang
,
L.
Zhang
,
W.
Gao
,
Y. J.
Xiang
,
T. J.
Cui
, and
S.
Zhang
, “
Gain- and loss-induced topological insulating phase in a non-Hermitian electrical circuit
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
13
,
014047
(
2020
).
127.
T.
Hofmann
,
T.
Helbig
,
F.
Schindler
,
N.
Salgo
,
M.
Brzezińska
,
M.
Greiter
,
T.
Kiessling
,
D.
Wolf
,
A.
Vollhardt
,
A.
Kabaši
,
C. H.
Lee
,
A.
Bilušić
,
R.
Thomale
, and
T.
Neupert
, “
Reciprocal skin effect and its realization in a topolectrical circuit
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
023265
(
2020
).
128.
S.
Franca
,
T.
Seidemann
,
F.
Hassler
,
J.
Van Den Brink
, and
I. C.
Fulga
, “
Impedance spectroscopy of chiral symmetric topoelectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
L241103
(
2024
).
129.
W.
Zhang
,
D.
Zou
,
J.
Bao
,
W.
He
,
Q.
Pei
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Topolectrical-circuit realization of a four-dimensional hexadecapole insulator
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
100102
(
2020
).
130.
X.
Zheng
,
T.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Topological states in a five-dimensional non-Hermitian system
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
085307
(
2024
).
131.
T.
Iizuka
,
H.
Yuan
,
Y.
Mita
,
A.
Higo
,
S.
Yasunaga
, and
M.
Ezawa
, “
Experimental demonstration of position-controllable topological interface states in high-frequency Kitaev topological integrated circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
279
(
2023
).
132.
A.
Nagulu
,
X.
Ni
,
A.
Kord
,
M.
Tymchenko
,
S.
Garikapati
,
A.
Alù
, and
H.
Krishnaswamy
, “
Chip-scale Floquet topological insulators for 5G wireless systems
,”
Nat. Electron.
5
,
300
(
2022
).
133.
Y.
Liu
,
W.
Cao
,
W.
Chen
,
H.
Wang
,
L.
Yang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Fully integrated topological electronics
,”
Sci. Rep.
12
,
13410
(
2022
).
134.
G.
Tang
,
X.
He
,
F.
Shi
,
J.
Liu
,
X.
Chen
, and
J.
Dong
, “
Topological photonic crystals: Physics, designs, and applications
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
16
,
2100300
(
2022
).
135.
K.
Sengupta
,
T.
Nagatsuma
, and
D. M.
Mittleman
, “
Terahertz integrated electronic and hybrid electronic–photonic systems
,”
Nat. Electron.
1
,
622
(
2018
).
136.
J.-H.
Zhang
,
F.
Mei
,
Y.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
,
J.
Ma
,
L.
Xiao
, and
S.
Jia
, “
Observation of higher-order time-dislocation topological modes
,”
Nat. Commun.
16
,
2050
(
2025
).
137.
Y.
Hadad
,
J. C.
Soric
,
A. B.
Khanikaev
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Self-induced topological protection in nonlinear circuit arrays
,”
Nat. Electron.
1
,
178
(
2018
).
138.
D. N.
Christodoulides
,
F.
Lederer
, and
Y.
Silberberg
, “
Discretizing light behaviour in linear and nonlinear waveguide lattices
,”
Nature
424
,
817
(
2003
).
139.
X.
Zhang
,
F.
Zangeneh-Nejad
,
Z.-G.
Chen
,
M.-H.
Lu
, and
J.
Christensen
, “
A second wave of topological phenomena in photonics and acoustics
,”
Nature
618
,
687
(
2023
).
140.
M.
Lapine
,
I. V.
Shadrivov
, and
Y. S.
Kivshar
, “
Colloquium: Nonlinear metamaterials
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
86
,
1093
(
2014
).
141.
L. J.
Maczewsky
,
M.
Heinrich
,
M.
Kremer
,
S. K.
Ivanov
,
M.
Ehrhardt
,
F.
Martinez
,
Y. V.
Kartashov
,
V. V.
Konotop
,
L.
Torner
,
D.
Bauer
, and
A.
Szameit
, “
Nonlinearity-induced photonic topological insulator
,”
Science
370
,
701
(
2020
).
142.
A.
Szameit
and
M. C.
Rechtsman
, “
Discrete nonlinear topological photonics
,”
Nat. Phys.
20
,
905
(
2024
).
143.
S.
Mukherjee
and
M. C.
Rechtsman
, “
Observation of Floquet solitons in a topological bandgap
,”
Science
368
,
856
(
2020
).
144.
M.
Jürgensen
,
S.
Mukherjee
, and
M. C.
Rechtsman
, “
Quantized nonlinear Thouless pumping
,”
Nature
596
,
63
(
2021
).
145.
H.
Yang
,
L.
Song
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Circuit realization of topological physics
,”
Phys. Rep.
1093
,
1
(
2024
).
146.
T.
Chen
,
W.
Zhang
,
D.
Zou
,
Y.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Engineering topological states and quantum-inspired information processing using classical circuits
,”
Adv. Quantum Technol.
2400448 (published online)
(
2025
).
147.
M.
De Carlo
,
F.
De Leonardis
,
R. A.
Soref
,
L.
Colatorti
, and
V. M. N.
Passaro
, “
Non-Hermitian sensing in photonics and electronics: A review
,”
Sensors
22
,
3977
(
2022
).
148.
W.
Deng
,
W.
Zhu
,
T.
Chen
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Ultrasensitive integrated circuit sensors based on high-order non-Hermitian topological physics
,”
Sci. Adv.
10
,
eadp6905
(
2024
).
149.
A.
Kumar
,
M.
Gupta
, and
R.
Singh
, “
Topological integrated circuits for 5G and 6G
,”
Nat. Electron.
5
,
261
(
2022
).
150.
M.
Mirhosseini
,
E.
Kim
,
V. S.
Ferreira
,
M.
Kalaee
,
A.
Sipahigil
,
A. J.
Keller
, and
O.
Painter
, “
Superconducting metamaterials for waveguide quantum electrodynamics
,”
Nat. Commun.
9
,
3706
(
2018
).
151.
W. P.
Su
,
J. R.
Schrieffer
, and
A. J.
Heeger
, “
Solitons in polyacetylene
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
42
,
1698
(
1979
).
152.
H.
Sahin
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
J. F.
Kong
,
M. B. A.
Jalil
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Impedance responses and size-dependent resonances in topolectrical circuits via the method of images
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
245114
(
2023
).
153.
X.
Zhang
,
B.
Zhang
,
H.
Sahin
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
J. F.
Kong
,
B.
Shen
,
M. B. A.
Jalil
,
R.
Thomale
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Anomalous fractal scaling in two-dimensional electric networks
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
151
(
2023
).
154.
D.
Atkinson
and
F. J.
van Steenwijk
, “
Infinite resistive lattices
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
486
(
1999
).
155.
J. W.
Essam
and
F. Y.
Wu
, “
The exact evaluation of the corner-to-corner resistance of an M × N resistor network: Asymptotic expansion
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
42
,
025205
(
2009
).
156.
V.
Čerňanová
,
J.
Brenkuŝ
, and
V.
Stopjaková
, “
Non-symmetric finite networks: The two-point resistance
,”
J. Electr. Eng.
65
,
283
(
2014
).
157.
N. S.
Izmailian
and
R.
Kenna
, “
A generalised formulation of the Laplacian approach to resistor networks
,”
J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.
2014
,
P09016
.
158.
M.
Malik
, “
Lattice Green/Neumann function for the 2D Laplacian operator defined on square lattice on cylinders, Tori and other geometries with some applications
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.
56
,
215202
(
2023
).
159.
Z.-Z.
Tan
, “
Two-point resistance of an m×n resistor network with an arbitrary boundary and its application in RLC network
,”
Chin. Phys. B
25
,
050504
(
2016
).
160.
F.
Perrier
and
F.
Girault
, “
Two-point resistances in symmetric bracelet resistor networks: Accurate estimates and exact expressions
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
45
,
025805
(
2024
).
161.
M.
Mamode
, “
Revisiting the discrete planar Laplacian: Exact results for the lattice Green function and continuum limit
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
136
,
412
(
2021
).
162.
J. H.
Asad
,
A. A.
Diab
,
R. S.
Hijjawi
, and
J. M.
Khalifeh
, “
Infinite face-centered-cubic network of identical resistors: Application to lattice Green’s function
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
128
,
2
(
2013
).
163.
M.
Mamode
, “
Calculation of two-point resistances for conducting media needs regularization of Coulomb singularities
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
134
,
559
(
2019
).
164.
D.
Zou
,
T.
Chen
,
W.
He
,
J.
Bao
,
C. H.
Lee
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of hybrid higher-order skin-topological effect in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
12
,
7201
(
2021
).
165.
X.
Zhang
,
C.
Wu
,
M.
Yan
,
N.
Liu
,
Z.
Wang
, and
G.
Chen
, “
Observation of continuum Landau modes in non-Hermitian electric circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
1798
(
2024
).
166.
C.
Shang
,
S.
Liu
,
C.
Jiang
,
R.
Shao
,
X.
Zang
,
C. H.
Lee
,
R.
Thomale
,
A.
Manchon
,
T. J.
Cui
, and
U.
Schwingenschlögl
, “
Observation of a higher-order end topological insulator in a real projective lattice
,”
Adv. Sci.
11
,
2303222
(
2024
).
167.
C.-X.
Guo
,
L.
Su
,
Y.
Wang
,
L.
Li
,
J.
Wang
,
X.
Ruan
,
Y.
Du
,
D.
Zheng
,
S.
Chen
, and
H.
Hu
, “
Scale-tailored localization and its observation in non-Hermitian electrical circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
9120
(
2024
).
168.
R.
Li
,
B.
Lv
,
H.
Tao
,
J.
Shi
,
Y.
Chong
,
B.
Zhang
, and
H.
Chen
, “
Ideal type-II Weyl points in topological circuits
,”
Natl. Sci. Rev.
8
,
nwaa192
(
2021
).
169.
C.
Shang
,
S.
Liu
,
R.
Shao
,
P.
Han
,
X.
Zang
,
X.
Zhang
,
K. N.
Salama
,
W.
Gao
,
C. H.
Lee
,
R.
Thomale
,
A.
Manchon
,
S.
Zhang
,
T. J.
Cui
, and
U.
Schwingenschlögl
, “
Experimental identification of the second-order non-Hermitian skin effect with physics-graph-informed machine learning
,”
Adv. Sci.
9
,
2202922
(
2022
).
170.
R.
El-Ganainy
,
K. G.
Makris
,
M.
Khajavikhan
,
Z. H.
Musslimani
,
S.
Rotter
, and
D. N.
Christodoulides
, “
Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry
,”
Nat. Phys.
14
,
11
(
2018
).
171.
J.
Wiersig
, “
Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
112
,
203901
(
2014
).
172.
W.
Zhao
,
Y.
Zhang
,
Z.
Gao
,
D.
Peng
,
J.-l.
Kou
,
Y.-q.
Lu
,
R.
El-Ganainy
,
Ş. K.
Özdemir
, and
Q.
Zhong
, “
Exceptional points induced by unidirectional coupling in electronic circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
9907
(
2024
).
173.
P.-Y.
Chen
,
M.
Sakhdari
,
M.
Hajizadegan
,
Q.
Cui
,
M. M.-C.
Cheng
,
R.
El-Ganainy
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Generalized parity–time symmetry condition for enhanced sensor telemetry
,”
Nat. Electron.
1
,
297
(
2018
).
174.
W.
Chen
,
Ş. K.
Özdemir
,
G.
Zhao
,
J.
Wiersig
, and
L.
Yang
, “
Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity
,”
Nature
548
,
192
(
2017
).
175.
Y.
Choi
,
C.
Hahn
,
J. W.
Yoon
, and
S. H.
Song
, “
Observation of an anti-PT-symmetric exceptional point and energy-difference conserving dynamics in electrical circuit resonators
,”
Nat. Commun.
9
,
2182
(
2018
).
176.
J.
Wiersig
, “
Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory
,”
Phys. Rev. A
93
,
033809
(
2016
).
177.
J.
Wiersig
, “
Review of exceptional point-based sensors
,”
Photonics Res.
8
,
1457
(
2020
).
178.
K.
Ding
,
C.
Fang
, and
G.
Ma
, “
Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
4
,
745
(
2022
).
179.
S. K.
Özdemir
,
S.
Rotter
,
F.
Nori
, and
L.
Yang
, “
Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics
,”
Nat. Mater.
18
,
783
(
2019
).
180.
H.
Meng
,
Y. S.
Ang
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems: Applications and recent developments
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
124
,
060502
(
2024
).
181.
M.-A.
Miri
and
A.
Alù
, “
Exceptional points in optics and photonics
,”
Science
363
,
eaar7709
(
2019
).
182.
H.
Hodaei
,
A. U.
Hassan
,
S.
Wittek
,
H.
Garcia-Gracia
,
R.
El-Ganainy
,
D. N.
Christodoulides
, and
M.
Khajavikhan
, “
Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points
,”
Nature
548
,
187
(
2017
).
183.
H.
Hodaei
,
M.-A.
Miri
,
M.
Heinrich
,
D. N.
Christodoulides
, and
M.
Khajavikhan
, “
Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers
,”
Science
346
,
975
(
2014
).
184.
B.
Peng
,
S. K.
Özdemir
,
F.
Lei
,
F.
Monifi
,
M.
Gianfreda
,
G. L.
Long
,
S.
Fan
,
F.
Nori
,
C. M.
Bender
, and
L.
Yang
, “
Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities
,”
Nat. Phys.
10
,
394
(
2014
).
185.
C.
Lee
,
K.
Zhang
,
J.
Miao
,
K.
Sun
, and
H.
Deng
, “
Topologically protected exceptional points and reentrant PT phase in an exact ternary model
,”
Phys. Rev. A
109
,
053503
(
2024
).
186.
J. T.
Gohsrich
,
J.
Fauman
, and
F. K.
Kunst
, “
Exceptional points of any order in a generalized Hatano-Nelson model
,” (
2024
).
187.
S.
Panahi
,
L.-L.
Ye
, and
Y.-C.
Lai
, “
Higher-order exceptional points and stochastic resonance in pseudo-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
22
,
054063
(
2024
).
188.
Y.-X.
Xiao
,
J.
Hu
,
Z.-Q.
Zhang
, and
C. T.
Chan
, “
Experimental demonstration of splitting rules for exceptional points and their topological characterization
,”
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
115427
(
2023
).
189.
Z.
Li
,
C.
Li
,
Z.
Xiong
,
G.
Xu
,
Y. R.
Wang
,
X.
Tian
,
X.
Yang
,
Z.
Liu
,
Q.
Zeng
,
R.
Lin
,
Y.
Li
,
J. K. W.
Lee
,
J. S.
Ho
, and
C.-W.
Qiu
, “
Stochastic exceptional points for noise-assisted sensing
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
130
,
227201
(
2023
).
190.
J.
Hu
,
R.-Y.
Zhang
,
M.
Wang
,
D.
Wang
,
S.
Ma
,
J.
Huang
,
L.
Wang
,
X.
Ouyang
,
Y.
Zhu
,
H.
Jia
, and
C. T.
Chan
, “
Unconventional bulk-Fermi-arc links paired third-order exceptional points splitting from a defective triple point
,”
Commun. Phys.
8
,
90
(
2025
).
191.
W.
Tang
,
K.
Ding
, and
G.
Ma
, “
Realization and topological properties of third-order exceptional lines embedded in exceptional surfaces
,”
Nat. Commun.
14
,
6660
(
2023
).
192.
J.
Cao
,
X. X.
Yi
, and
H.-F.
Wang
, “
Band structure and the exceptional ring in a two-dimensional superconducting circuit lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. A
102
,
032619
(
2020
).
193.
A. A.
Burkov
,
M. D.
Hook
, and
L.
Balents
, “
Topological nodal semimetals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
84
,
235126
(
2011
).
194.
J.
Hu
,
S.-Y.
Xu
,
N.
Ni
, and
Z.
Mao
, “
Transport of topological semimetals
,”
Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.
49
,
207
(
2019
).
195.
H.
Weng
,
Y.
Liang
,
Q.
Xu
,
R.
Yu
,
Z.
Fang
,
X.
Dai
, and
Y.
Kawazoe
, “
Topological node-line semimetal in three-dimensional graphene networks
,”
Phys. Rev. B
92
,
045108
(
2015
).
196.
G.
Bian
,
T.-R.
Chang
,
H.
Zheng
,
S.
Velury
,
S.-Y.
Xu
,
T.
Neupert
,
C.-K.
Chiu
,
S.-M.
Huang
,
D. S.
Sanchez
,
I.
Belopolski
,
N.
Alidoust
,
P.-J.
Chen
,
G.
Chang
,
A.
Bansil
,
H.-T.
Jeng
,
H.
Lin
, and
M. Z.
Hasan
, “
Drumhead surface states and topological nodal-line fermions in TlTaSe2
,”
Phys. Rev. B
93
,
121113
(
2016
).
197.
C.
Fang
,
Y.
Chen
,
H.-Y.
Kee
, and
L.
Fu
, “
Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. B
92
,
081201
(
2015
).
198.
M.
Wang
,
S.
Liu
,
Q.
Ma
,
R.-Y.
Zhang
,
D.
Wang
,
Q.
Guo
,
B.
Yang
,
M.
Ke
,
Z.
Liu
, and
C.
Chan
, “
Experimental observation of non-Abelian earring nodal links in phononic crystals
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
246601
(
2022
).
199.
J.
Schindler
,
A.
Li
,
M. C.
Zheng
,
F. M.
Ellis
, and
T.
Kottos
, “
Experimental study of active LRC circuits with PT symmetries
,”
Phys. Rev. A
84
,
040101
(
2011
).
200.
W.
Cao
,
C.
Wang
,
W.
Chen
,
S.
Hu
,
H.
Wang
,
L.
Yang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Fully integrated parity–time-symmetric electronics
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
17
,
262
(
2022
).
201.
Z.
Dong
,
Z.
Li
,
F.
Yang
,
C.-W.
Qiu
, and
J. S.
Ho
, “
Sensitive readout of implantable microsensors using a wireless system locked to an exceptional point
,”
Nat. Electron.
2
,
335
(
2019
).
202.
K.
Bai
,
T.-R.
Liu
,
L.
Fang
,
J.-Z.
Li
,
C.
Lin
,
D.
Wan
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Observation of nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
,
073802
(
2024
).
203.
X.
Yang
,
J.
Li
,
Y.
Ding
,
M.
Xu
,
X.-F.
Zhu
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Observation of transient parity-time symmetry in electronic systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
065701
(
2022
).
204.
W.
Cao
,
W.
Zhang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of knot topology of exceptional points
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
165128
(
2024
).
205.
D.-Y.
Chen
,
L.
Dong
, and
Q.-A.
Huang
, “
Inductor-capacitor passive wireless sensors using nonlinear parity-time symmetric configurations
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
9312
(
2024
).
206.
S.
Assawaworrarit
and
S.
Fan
, “
Robust and efficient wireless power transfer using a switch-mode implementation of a nonlinear parity–time symmetric circuit
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
273
(
2020
).
207.
K.
Bai
,
J.-Z.
Li
,
T.-R.
Liu
,
L.
Fang
,
D.
Wan
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
130
,
266901
(
2023
).
208.
T.
Dai
,
Y.
Ao
,
J.
Mao
,
Y.
Yang
,
Y.
Zheng
,
C.
Zhai
,
Y.
Li
,
J.
Yuan
,
B.
Tang
,
Z.
Li
,
J.
Luo
,
W.
Wang
,
X.
Hu
,
Q.
Gong
, and
J.
Wang
, “
Non-Hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity
,”
Nat. Phys.
20
,
101
(
2024
).
209.
J.
Gong
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Topological phase transitions have never been faster
,”
Nat. Phys.
20
,
12
(
2024
).
210.
L.
Fang
,
K.
Bai
,
C.
Guo
,
T.-R.
Liu
,
J.-Z.
Li
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Exceptional features in nonlinear Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
L161102
(
2025
).
211.
J.
Chen
,
X.
Du
,
Q.
Luo
,
X.
Zhang
,
P.
Sun
, and
L.
Zhou
, “
A review of switching oscillations of wide bandgap semiconductor devices
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
35
,
13182
(
2020
).
212.
R.
Rodrigues
,
Y.
Du
,
A.
Antoniazzi
, and
P.
Cairoli
, “
A review of solid-state circuit breakers
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
36
,
364
(
2021
).
213.
B.
Zhu
,
Q.
Wang
,
Y.
Wang
,
Q. J.
Wang
, and
Y. D.
Chong
, “
Versatile braiding of non-Hermitian topological edge states
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
134317
(
2024
).
214.
Z.
Pu
,
J.
Wu
,
X.
Chen
,
J.
Lu
,
X.
Huang
,
W.
Deng
,
M.
Ke
, and
Z.
Liu
, “
Non-Hermitian winding and braiding of topological boundary states
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
075123
(
2025
).
215.
R.
Bi
,
Z.
Yan
,
L.
Lu
, and
Z.
Wang
, “
Nodal-knot semimetals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
201305
(
2017
).
216.
J.-W.
Ryu
,
J.-H.
Han
,
C.-H.
Yi
,
M. J.
Park
, and
H. C.
Park
, “
Exceptional classifications of non-Hermitian systems
,”
Commun. Phys.
7
,
109
(
2024
).
217.
X.
Zhang
,
G.
Li
,
Y.
Liu
,
T.
Tai
,
R.
Thomale
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Tidal surface states as fingerprints of non-Hermitian nodal knot metals
,”
Commun. Phys.
4
,
47
(
2021
).
218.
J.
Carlström
,
M.
Stålhammar
,
J. C.
Budich
, and
E. J.
Bergholtz
, “
Knotted non-Hermitian metals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
161115
(
2019
).
219.
M.
Stålhammar
,
L.
Rødland
,
G.
Arone
,
J. C.
Budich
, and
E.
Bergholtz
, “
Hyperbolic nodal band structures and knot invariants
,”
SciPost Phys.
7
,
019
(
2019
).
220.
V. I.
Arnold
,
G.
Wassermann
, and
R.
Thomas
,
Catastrophe Theory
(
Springer
,
1986
), Vol.
3
.
221.
A.
Chandrasekaran
,
A.
Shtyk
,
J. J.
Betouras
, and
C.
Chamon
, “
Catastrophe theory classification of Fermi surface topological transitions in two dimensions
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
013355
(
2020
).
222.
J.
Hu
,
R.-Y.
Zhang
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Ouyang
,
Y.
Zhu
,
H.
Jia
, and
C. T.
Chan
, “
Non-Hermitian swallowtail catastrophe revealing transitions among diverse topological singularities
,”
Nat. Phys.
19
,
1098
(
2023
).
223.
D.
Zou
,
T.
Chen
,
H.
Meng
,
Y. S.
Ang
,
X.
Zhang
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Experimental observation of exceptional bound states in a classical circuit network
,”
Sci. Bull.
69
,
2194
(
2024
).
224.
C. H.
Lee
, “
Exceptional bound states and negative entanglement entropy
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
010402
(
2022
).
225.
S.
Liu
,
H.
Jiang
,
W.-T.
Xue
,
Q.
Li
,
J.
Gong
,
X.
Liu
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Non-Hermitian entanglement dip from scaling-induced exceptional criticality
,” (
2024
).
226.
W.-T.
Xue
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Topologically protected negative entanglement
,” (
2024
).
227.
Z.
Gong
,
Y.
Ashida
,
K.
Kawabata
,
K.
Takasan
,
S.
Higashikawa
, and
M.
Ueda
, “
Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. X
8
,
031079
(
2018
).
228.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Geometric characterization of non-Hermitian topological systems through the singularity ring in pseudospin vector space
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
075403
(
2019
).
229.
K.
Kawabata
,
K.
Shiozaki
,
M.
Ueda
, and
M.
Sato
, “
Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics
,”
Phys. Rev. X
9
,
041015
(
2019
).
230.
Y.
Ashida
,
Z.
Gong
, and
M.
Ueda
, “
Non-Hermitian physics
,”
Adv. Phys.
69
,
249
(
2020
).
231.
R.
Lin
,
T.
Tai
,
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Topological non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Front. Phys.
18
,
53605
(
2023
).
232.
N.
Okuma
and
M.
Sato
, “
Non-Hermitian topological phenomena: A review
,”
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
14
,
83
(
2023
).
233.
X.
Zhang
,
T.
Zhang
,
M.-H.
Lu
, and
Y.-F.
Chen
, “
A review on non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Adv. Phys.: X
7
,
2109431
(
2022
).
234.
K.
Yokomizo
,
Non-Bloch Band Theory of Non-Hermitian Systems
,
Springer Theses
(
Springer Nature Singapore
,
2022
).
235.
C. H.
Lee
and
P.
Ye
, “
Free-fermion entanglement spectrum through Wannier interpolation
,”
Phys. Rev. B
91
,
085119
(
2015
).
236.
F.
Qin
,
Y.
Ma
,
R.
Shen
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Universal competitive spectral scaling from the critical non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
155430
(
2023
).
237.
Q.
Li
,
H.
Jiang
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Phase-space Generalized Brillouin Zone for spatially inhomogeneous non-Hermitian systems
,” (
2025
).
238.
T. E.
Lee
, “
Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
,
133903
(
2016
).
239.
Z.
Yang
,
K.
Zhang
,
C.
Fang
, and
J.
Hu
, “
Non-Hermitian bulk-boundary correspondence and auxiliary generalized Brillouin zone theory
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
,
226402
(
2020
).
240.
V. M.
Martinez Alvarez
,
J. E.
Barrios Vargas
, and
L. E. F.
Foa Torres
, “
Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points
,”
Phys. Rev. B
97
,
121401
(
2018
).
241.
S.
Yao
and
Z.
Wang
, “
Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
121
,
086803
(
2018
).
242.
C. H.
Lee
and
R.
Thomale
, “
Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
201103
(
2019
).
243.
L.
Li
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Non-Hermitian pseudo-gaps
,”
Sci. Bull.
67
,
685
(
2022
).
244.
S.
Lieu
, “
Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model
,”
Phys. Rev. B
97
,
045106
(
2018
).
245.
H.
Jiang
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Dimensional transmutation from non-Hermiticity
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
131
,
076401
(
2023
).
246.
J.-R.
Li
,
C.
Jiang
,
H.
Su
,
D.
Qi
,
L.-L.
Zhang
, and
W.-J.
Gong
, “
Parity-dependent skin effects and topological properties in the multilayer nonreciprocal Su–Schrieffer–Heeger structures
,”
Front. Phys.
19
,
33204
(
2024
).
247.
H.
He
,
Z.
Chen
,
H.
Li
,
C.-H.
Tu
,
J.
Xu
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Evanescent wave spectral singularities in non-Hermitian photonics
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
L041405
(
2024
).
248.
C. H.
Lee
,
L.
Li
,
R.
Thomale
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Unraveling non-Hermitian pumping: Emergent spectral singularities and anomalous responses
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
085151
(
2020
).
249.
Y.
Qi
,
J.
Pi
,
Y.
Wu
,
H.
Lin
,
C.
Zheng
, and
G.-L.
Long
, “
Extended imaginary gauge transformation in a general nonreciprocal lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
075411
(
2024
).
250.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
M. S. H.
Razo
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Dynamic manipulation of non-Hermitian skin effect through frequency in topolectrical circuits
,” (
2024
).
251.
C.
Yuce
and
H.
Ramezani
, “
Strong edge burst with bipolar non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
214301
(
2024
).
252.
J.-R.
Li
,
L.-L.
Zhang
,
C.-H.
Zhao
,
S.-F.
Zhang
,
Y.-L.
Zhu
, and
W.-J.
Gong
, “
Spatially separated skin effect and edge states in one-dimensional semi–Su-Schrieffer-Heeger lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
165407
(
2024
).
253.
L.
Li
,
Y.
Wei
,
G.
Wu
,
Y.
Ruan
,
S.
Chen
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
Z.
Ni
, “
Exact solutions disentangle higher-order topology in two-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
075132
(
2025
).
254.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Non-Hermitian topological phases and exceptional lines in topolectrical circuits
,”
New J. Phys.
23
,
033014
(
2021
).
255.
Z.
Oztas
and
N.
Candemir
, “
Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with imaginary gauge field
,”
Phys. Lett. A
383
,
1821
(
2019
).
256.
A.
Ghatak
,
M.
Brandenbourger
,
J.
Van Wezel
, and
C.
Coulais
, “
Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
117
,
29561
(
2020
).
257.
C.
Yuce
, “
Edge states at the interface of non-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. A
97
,
042118
(
2018
).
258.
W.-T.
Xue
,
Y.-M.
Hu
,
F.
Song
, and
Z.
Wang
, “
Non-Hermitian edge burst
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
120401
(
2022
).
259.
C. H.
Lee
,
L.
Li
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Hybrid higher-order skin-topological modes in nonreciprocal systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
016805
(
2019
).
260.
Y.
Li
,
C.
Liang
,
C.
Wang
,
C.
Lu
, and
Y.-C.
Liu
, “
Gain-loss-induced hybrid skin-topological effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
223903
(
2022
).
261.
K.
Kawabata
,
M.
Sato
, and
K.
Shiozaki
, “
Higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
205118
(
2020
).
262.
S.
Longhi
, “
Self-healing of non-Hermitian topological skin modes
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
157601
(
2022
).
263.
F. K.
Kunst
,
E.
Edvardsson
,
J. C.
Budich
, and
E. J.
Bergholtz
, “
Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
121
,
026808
(
2018
).
264.
Y.
Fu
and
S.
Wan
, “
Degeneracy and defectiveness in non-Hermitian systems with open boundary
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
075420
(
2022
).
265.
X.
Zhang
,
C.
Wu
,
M.
Yan
, and
G.
Chen
, “
Observation of non-Hermitian pseudo-mobility-edge in a coupled electric circuit ladder
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
014304
(
2025
).
266.
R.
Arouca
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
C.
Morais Smith
, “
Unconventional scaling at non-Hermitian critical points
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
245145
(
2020
).
267.
M.
Lu
,
X.-X.
Zhang
, and
M.
Franz
, “
Magnetic suppression of non-Hermitian skin effects
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
127
,
256402
(
2021
).
268.
H.
Jiang
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Filling up complex spectral regions through non-Hermitian disordered chains
,”
Chin. Phys. B
31
,
050307
(
2022
).
269.
R.
Yang
,
J. W.
Tan
,
T.
Tai
,
J. M.
Koh
,
L.
Li
,
S.
Longhi
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Designing non-Hermitian real spectra through electrostatics
,”
Sci. Bull.
67
,
1865
(
2022
).
270.
D. S.
Borgnia
,
A. J.
Kruchkov
, and
R.-J.
Slager
, “
Non-Hermitian boundary modes and topology
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
056802
(
2020
).
271.
N.
Okuma
,
K.
Kawabata
,
K.
Shiozaki
, and
M.
Sato
, “
Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
086801
(
2020
).
272.
T.
Tai
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Zoology of non-Hermitian spectra and their graph topology
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
L220301
(
2023
).
273.
C.-X.
Guo
,
C.-H.
Liu
,
X.-M.
Zhao
,
Y.
Liu
, and
S.
Chen
, “
Exact solution of non-Hermitian systems with generalized boundary conditions: Size-dependent boundary effect and fragility of the skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
127
,
116801
(
2021
).
274.
S.
Longhi
, “
Probing non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch phase transitions
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
1
,
023013
(
2019
).
275.
W.
Li
,
Z.
Sun
,
Z.
Yang
, and
F.
Li
, “
Universal scalefree non-Hermitian skin effect near the Bloch point
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
035119
(
2024
).
276.
Y.
Xiong
and
H.
Hu
, “
Graph morphology of non-Hermitian bands
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
L100301
(
2024
).
277.
Y.
Xiong
, “
Why does bulk boundary correspondence fail in some non-Hermitian topological models
,”
J. Phys. Commun.
2
,
035043
(
2018
).
278.
H.-Y.
Wang
,
F.
Song
, and
Z.
Wang
, “
Amoeba formulation of non-Bloch band theory in arbitrary dimensions
,”
Phys. Rev. X
14
,
021011
(
2024
).
279.
F.
Song
,
S.
Yao
, and
Z.
Wang
, “
Non-Hermitian topological invariants in real space
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
246801
(
2019
).
280.
K.
Kawabata
,
N.
Okuma
, and
M.
Sato
, “
Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in the symplectic class
,”
Phys. Rev. B
101
,
195147
(
2020
).
281.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
,
S.
Mu
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Critical non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
5491
(
2020
).
282.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Critical hybridization of skin modes in coupled non-Hermitian chains
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
4
,
013243
(
2022
).
283.
Z. B.
Siu
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Terminal-coupling induced critical eigenspectrum transition in closed non-Hermitian loops
,”
Sci. Rep.
13
,
22770
(
2023
).
284.
K.
Zhang
,
C.
Shu
, and
K.
Sun
, “
Algebraic non-Hermitian skin effect and unified non-Bloch band theory in arbitrary dimensions
,” (
2024
).
285.
A.
Yang
,
Z.
Fang
,
K.
Zhang
, and
C.
Fang
, “
Tailoring bound state geometry in high-dimensional non-Hermitian systems
,”
Commun. Phys.
8
,
124
(
2025
).
286.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
M. S. H.
Razo
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Critical non-Hermitian skin effect in a cross-coupled Hermitian chain
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
115415
(
2025
).
287.
Y.
Qin
and
L.
Li
, “
Occupation-dependent particle separation in one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
,
096501
(
2024
).
288.
Y.-A.
Wang
and
L.
Li
, “
Non-Hermitian skin effects in fragmented hilbert spaces of one-dimensional fermionic lattices
,”
Chin. Phys. Lett.
42
,
037301
(
2025
).
289.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Unconventional skin modes in generalized topolectrical circuits with multiple asymmetric couplings
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
4
,
043108
(
2022
).
290.
X.
Shen
,
X.
Wang
,
H.
Guo
, and
X.
Zhou
, “
Energy localization and topological defect in spherical non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Ann. Phys.
536
,
2400026
(
2024
).
291.
H.
Zhang
,
T.
Chen
,
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Electrical circuit realization of topological switching for the non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
085426
(
2023
).
292.
C.
Tang
,
H.
Yang
,
L.
Song
,
X.
Yao
,
P.
Yan
, and
Y.
Cao
, “
Competition of non-Hermitian skin effect and topological localization of corner states observed in circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
035410
(
2023
).
293.
W.
Zhang
,
F.
Di
,
H.
Yuan
,
H.
Wang
,
X.
Zheng
,
L.
He
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of non-Hermitian aggregation effects induced by strong interactions
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
195131
(
2022
).
294.
P.
Zhu
,
X.-Q.
Sun
,
T. L.
Hughes
, and
G.
Bahl
, “
Higher rank chirality and non-Hermitian skin effect in a topolectrical circuit
,”
Nat. Commun.
14
,
720
(
2023
).
295.
R.-L.
Zhang
,
Q.-P.
Wu
,
M.-R.
Liu
,
Y.-Z.
Li
,
L.-L.
Chang
,
W.-Y.
Li
,
F.-F.
Liu
,
X.-B.
Xiao
, and
Z.-F.
Liu
, “
Finite-admittance topological bounded corner states in the kagome topolectrical circuits
,”
Physica E
134
,
114876
(
2021
).
296.
J.
Huang
,
S.
Guo
,
S.
Qiu
,
B.
Li
,
L.
Xu
,
F.
Zhuang
,
S.
Su
,
Z.
Lin
,
R.
Huang
, and
W.
Qiu
, “
Zero-admittance states in honeycomb topological circuits
,”
Phys. Scr.
98
,
115907
(
2023
).
297.
H.
Jiang
,
X.
Wang
,
J.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhou
, “
Multiple asymmetric couplings induced unconventional corner mode in topolectrical circuits
,”
New J. Phys.
26
,
033004
(
2024
).
298.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Topological switch for non-Hermitian skin effect in cold-atom systems with loss
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
250402
(
2020
).
299.
C. H.
Lee
, “
Many-body topological and skin states without open boundaries
,”
Phys. Rev. B
104
,
195102
(
2021
).
300.
M. A.
Gorlach
and
A. N.
Poddubny
, “
Topological edge states of bound photon pairs
,”
Phys. Rev. A
95
,
053866
(
2017
).
301.
A. N.
Poddubny
, “
Interaction-induced analog of a non-Hermitian skin effect in a lattice two-body problem
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
045131
(
2023
).
302.
R.
Shen
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Non-Hermitian skin clusters from strong interactions
,”
Commun. Phys.
5
,
238
(
2022
).
303.
K.
Suthar
,
Y.-C.
Wang
,
Y.-P.
Huang
,
H. H.
Jen
, and
J.-S.
You
, “
Non-Hermitian many-body localization with open boundaries
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
064208
(
2022
).
304.
M.
Yang
,
L.
Yuan
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Non-Hermitian ultra-strong bosonic condensation through interaction-induced caging
,” (
2024
).
305.
J. M.
Koh
,
T.
Tai
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Simulation of interaction-induced chiral topological dynamics on a digital quantum computer
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
129
,
140502
(
2022
).
306.
J. M.
Koh
,
T.
Tai
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Realization of higher-order topological lattices on a quantum computer
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
5807
(
2024
).
307.
J. M.
Koh
,
W.-T.
Xue
,
T.
Tai
,
D. E.
Koh
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Interacting non-Hermitian edge and cluster bursts on a digital quantum processor
,” (
2025
).
308.
N.
Hatano
and
D. R.
Nelson
, “
Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
77
,
570
(
1996
).
309.
Y.
Li
,
J.-H.
Zhang
,
F.
Mei
,
B.
Xie
,
M.-H.
Lu
,
J.
Ma
,
L.
Xiao
, and
S.
Jia
, “
Large-chiral-number corner modes in Z-class higher-order topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
20
,
064042
(
2023
).
310.
O.
Dubinkin
,
F. J.
Burnell
, and
T. L.
Hughes
, “
Higher rank chiral fermions in three-dimensional Weyl semimetals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
115146
(
2024
).
311.
W.
Maopeng
,
W.
Mingze
,
C.
Zhonghai
,
Q.
Yingyi
,
Z.
Siyong
,
L.
Fubei
,
L.
Xinxin
,
Z.
Qian
,
M.
Yonggang
, and
Z.
Ji
, “
Gain/loss-free non-Hermitian metamaterials
,” (
2024
).
312.
L.
Li
,
Y.
Li
,
J.-H.
Zhang
,
Y.
Kou
,
L.
Xiao
,
S.
Jia
, and
F.
Mei
, “
Observation of gauge field induced non-Hermitian helical spin skin effects
,”
Research Square
preprint
(
2025
).
313.
Q.
Yin
,
H.
Li
,
K.
Jiang
,
S.
Guo
,
R.
Huang
, and
W.
Qiu
, “
Observation of doubled edge states in extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger electric circuits with long-range coupling interactions
,”
Phys. Scr.
100
,
035960
(
2025
).
314.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Impurity induced scale-free localization
,”
Commun. Phys.
4
,
42
(
2021
).
315.
L.
Su
,
C.-X.
Guo
,
Y.
Wang
,
L.
Li
,
X.
Ruan
,
Y.
Du
,
S.
Chen
, and
D.
Zheng
, “
Observation of size-dependent boundary effects in non-Hermitian electric circuits
,”
Chin. Phys. B
32
,
038401
(
2023
).
316.
C.-X.
Guo
,
X.
Wang
,
H.
Hu
, and
S.
Chen
, “
Accumulation of scale-free localized states induced by local non-Hermiticity
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
134121
(
2023
).
317.
B.
Yılmaz
,
C.
Yuce
, and
C.
Bulutay
, “
From scale-free to Anderson localization: A size-dependent transition
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
214206
(
2024
).
318.
J. C.
Budich
and
E. J.
Bergholtz
, “
Non-Hermitian topological sensors
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
,
180403
(
2020
).
319.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
M. S. H.
Razo
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Saturation dynamics in non-Hermitian topological sensing systems
,” (
2024
).
320.
V.
Könye
,
K.
Ochkan
,
A.
Chyzhykova
,
J. C.
Budich
,
J.
Van Den Brink
,
I. C.
Fulga
, and
J.
Dufouleur
, “
Non-Hermitian topological ohmmeter
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
22
,
L031001
(
2024
).
321.
N.
Kong
,
M.
Tian
,
C.
Yu
,
Y.
Xu
,
M.
Fadel
,
X.
Huang
, and
Q.
He
, “
Manipulating spectral windings and skin modes through nonconservative couplings
,”
Phys. Rev. A
110
,
053507
(
2024
).
322.
W.-C.
Jiang
,
H.
Wu
,
Q.-X.
Li
,
J.
Li
, and
J.-J.
Zhu
, “
Tunable non-Hermitian skin effect via gain and loss
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
155144
(
2024
).
323.
M.-J.
Liao
,
M.-S.
Wei
,
Z.
Lin
,
J.
Xu
, and
Y.
Yang
, “
Non-Hermitian skin effect induced by on-site gain and loss in the optically coupled cavity array
,”
Res. Phys.
57
,
107372
(
2024
).
324.
P.
Marquié
,
J. M.
Bilbault
, and
M.
Remoissenet
, “
Nonlinear Schrödinger models and modulational instability in real electrical lattices
,”
Physica D
87
,
371
(
1995
).
325.
E.
Kengne
,
W.-M.
Liu
,
L. Q.
English
, and
B. A.
Malomed
, “
Ginzburg–Landau models of nonlinear electric transmission networks
,”
Phys. Rep.
982
,
1
(
2022
).
326.
Z.
Li
,
Y.
Cao
,
P.
Yan
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Higher-order topological solitonic insulators
,”
npj Comput. Mater.
5
,
107
(
2019
).
327.
H.
Hohmann
,
T.
Hofmann
,
T.
Helbig
,
S.
Imhof
,
H.
Brand
,
L. K.
Upreti
,
A.
Stegmaier
,
A.
Fritzsche
,
T.
Müller
,
U.
Schwingenschlögl
,
C. H.
Lee
,
M.
Greiter
,
L. W.
Molenkamp
,
T.
Kießling
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Observation of cnoidal wave localization in nonlinear topolectric circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
5
,
L012041
(
2023
).
328.
S.
Jana
,
B. M.
Manda
,
V.
Achilleos
,
D. J.
Frantzeskakis
, and
L.
Sirota
, “
Harnessing nonlinearity to tame wave dynamics in nonreciprocal active systems
,” (
2025
).
329.
R.
Li
,
X.
Kong
,
W.
Wang
,
Y.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhong
,
Y.
Jia
,
H.
Tao
, and
Y.
Liu
, “
Observation of edge solitons and their phase transition in a trimer circuit lattice
,” (
2024
).
330.
T.
Tuloup
,
R. W.
Bomantara
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Nonlinearity induced topological physics in momentum space and real space
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
115411
(
2020
).
331.
J.
Tang
,
F.
Ma
,
F.
Li
,
H.
Guo
, and
D.
Zhou
, “
Strongly nonlinear topological phases of cascaded topoelectrical circuits
,”
Front. Phys.
18
,
33311
(
2023
).
332.
S.
Xia
,
D.
Kaltsas
,
D.
Song
,
I.
Komis
,
J.
Xu
,
A.
Szameit
,
H.
Buljan
,
K. G.
Makris
, and
Z.
Chen
, “
Nonlinear tuning of PT symmetry and non-Hermitian topological states
,”
Science
372
,
72
(
2021
).
333.
L.-J.
Lang
,
S.-L.
Zhu
, and
Y. D.
Chong
, “
Non-Hermitian topological end breathers
,”
Phys. Rev. B
104
,
L020303
(
2021
).
334.
B.
Many Manda
and
V.
Achilleos
, “
Insensitive edge solitons in a non-Hermitian topological lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
L180302
(
2024
).
335.
J.
Veenstra
,
O.
Gamayun
,
X.
Guo
,
A.
Sarvi
,
C. V.
Meinersen
, and
C.
Coulais
, “
Non-reciprocal topological solitons in active metamaterials
,”
Nature
627
,
528
(
2024
).
336.
H.
Akgün
,
X.
Yan
,
T.
Taşkıran
,
M.
Ibrahimi
,
A.
Mobaraki
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
S.
Jahangirov
, “
Deterministic criticality & cluster dynamics hidden in the game of life
,” (
2024
).
337.
K.
Sone
,
M.
Ezawa
,
Z.
Gong
,
T.
Sawada
,
N.
Yoshioka
, and
T.
Sagawa
, “
Transition from the topological to the chaotic in the nonlinear Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model
,”
Nat. Commun.
16
,
422
(
2025
).
338.
K.
Sone
,
Y.
Ashida
, and
T.
Sagawa
, “
Topological synchronization of coupled nonlinear oscillators
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
4
,
023211
(
2022
).
339.
W.
Hu
,
B.
Ruan
,
W.
Lin
,
C.
Liu
,
X.
Dai
,
S.
Wen
, and
Y.
Xiang
, “
Observation of topologically enhanced third harmonic generation in doubly resonant nonlinear topolectrical circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
7
,
204
(
2024
).
340.
H.
Yang
,
L.
Song
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Simulating Thiele’s equation and collective skyrmion dynamics in circuit networks
,” (
2024
).
341.
H.
Lo
,
Y.
Wang
,
R.
Banerjee
,
B.
Zhang
, and
Y. D.
Chong
, “
Switchable non-Hermitian skin effect in Bogoliubov modes
,” (
2024
).
342.
W.
Zhang
,
F.
Di
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Non-Hermitian global synchronization
,”
Adv. Sci.
12
,
2408460
(
2025
).
343.
H.
Sahin
,
H.
Akgün
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
J. F.
Kong
,
M. B. A.
Jalil
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Protected chaos in a topological lattice
,” (
2024
).
344.
N.
Picqué
and
T. W.
Hänsch
, “
Frequency comb spectroscopy
,”
Nat. Photonics
13
,
146
(
2019
).
345.
Y.
Tokura
and
N.
Kanazawa
, “
Magnetic skyrmion materials
,”
Chem. Rev.
121
,
2857
(
2021
).
346.
C.
Yuce
, “
Nonlinear skin modes and fixed points
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
054201
(
2025
).
347.
B.
Many Manda
,
R.
Carretero-González
,
P. G.
Kevrekidis
, and
V.
Achilleos
, “
Skin modes in a nonlinear Hatano-Nelson model
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
094308
(
2024
).
348.
S.
Longhi
, “
Modulational instability and dynamical growth blockade in the nonlinear Hatano–Nelson model
,”
Adv. Phys. Res.
2400154 (published online)
(
2025
).
349.
N.
Bogoliubov
, “
On the theory of superfluidity
,”
J. Phys.
11
,
23
(
1947
).
350.
J. A.
Acebrón
,
L. L.
Bonilla
,
C. J.
Pérez Vicente
,
F.
Ritort
, and
R.
Spigler
, “
The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
77
,
137
(
2005
).
351.
F.
Di
,
W.
Zhang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of non-Hermitian topological synchronization
,”
Commun. Phys.
8
,
78
(
2025
).
352.
E. N.
Lorenz
, “
Deterministic nonperiodic flow
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
20
,
130
(
1963
).
353.
R.
May
, “
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
,”
Nature
261
,
459
467
(
1976
).
354.
M. P.
Kennedy
, “
Three steps to chaos. II. A Chua’s circuit primer
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
40
,
657
(
1993
).
355.
L. O.
Chua
,
The Genesis of Chua’s Circuit
(
Electronics Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of California
,
1992
).
356.
L. O.
Chua
, “
Chua’s circuit: An overview ten years later
,”
J. Circuits, Syst. Comput.
04
,
117
(
1994
).
357.
L.
Chua
, “
Dynamic nonlinear networks: State-of-the-art
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.
27
,
1059
(
1980
).
358.
R.
Barboza
and
L. O.
Chua
, “
The four-element Chua’s circuit
,”
Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos
18
,
943
(
2008
).
359.
M. S.
Rudner
,
N. H.
Lindner
,
E.
Berg
, and
M.
Levin
, “
Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems
,”
Phys. Rev. X
3
,
031005
(
2013
).
360.
F. L.
Traversa
,
M.
Di Ventra
, and
F.
Bonani
, “
Generalized floquet theory: Application to dynamical systems with memory and Bloch’s theorem for nonlocal potentials
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
,
170602
(
2013
).
361.
J.
Cayssol
,
B.
Dóra
,
F.
Simon
, and
R.
Moessner
, “
Floquet topological insulators
,”
Phys. Status Solidi RRL
7
,
101
(
2013
).
362.
M.
Rodriguez-Vega
,
M.
Vogl
, and
G. A.
Fiete
, “
Low-frequency and Moiré–Floquet engineering: A review
,”
Ann. Phys.
435
,
168434
(
2021
).
363.
M. A.
Sentef
,
M.
Claassen
,
A. f.
Kemper
,
B.
Moritz
,
T.
Oka
,
J. k.
Freericks
, and
T. p.
Devereaux
, “
Theory of Floquet band formation and local pseudospin textures in pump-probe photoemission of graphene
,”
Nat. Commun.
6
,
7047
(
2015
).
364.
C. H.
Lee
,
W. W.
Ho
,
B.
Yang
,
J.
Gong
, and
Z.
Papić
, “
Floquet mechanism for non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall states
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
121
,
237401
(
2018
).
365.
D.
Kennes
,
A.
De La Torre
,
A.
Ron
,
D.
Hsieh
, and
A.
Millis
, “
Floquet engineering in quantum chains
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
120
,
127601
(
2018
).
366.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Realistic floquet semimetal with exotic topological linkages between arbitrarily many nodal loops
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
121
,
036401
(
2018
).
367.
T.
Oka
and
S.
Kitamura
, “
Floquet engineering of quantum materials
,”
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
10
,
387
(
2019
).
368.
K.
Wintersperger
,
C.
Braun
,
F. N.
Ünal
,
A.
Eckardt
,
M. D.
Liberto
,
N.
Goldman
,
I.
Bloch
, and
M.
Aidelsburger
, “
Realization of an anomalous Floquet topological system with ultracold atoms
,”
Nat. Phys.
16
,
1058
(
2020
).
369.
M. S.
Rudner
and
N. H.
Lindner
, “
Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
2
,
229
(
2020
).
370.
Z.-F.
Cai
,
T.
Liu
, and
Z.
Yang
, “
Non-Hermitian skin effect in periodically driven dissipative ultracold atoms
,”
Phys. Rev. A
109
,
063329
(
2024
).
371.
F.
Harper
,
R.
Roy
,
M. S.
Rudner
, and
S. l.
Sondhi
, “
Topology and broken symmetry in Floquet systems
,”
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
11
,
345
(
2020
).
372.
C. H.
Lee
and
S.
Longhi
, “
Ultrafast and anharmonic Rabi oscillations between non-Bloch bands
,”
Commun. Phys.
3
,
147
(
2020
).
373.
L.
Li
,
S.
Mu
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Quantized classical response from spectral winding topology
,”
Nat. Commun.
12
,
5294
(
2021
).
374.
F.
Qin
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
R.
Chen
, “
Light-induced half-quantized Hall effect and axion insulator
,”
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
075435
(
2023
).
375.
F.
Qin
,
R.
Chen
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Light-enhanced nonlinear Hall effect
,”
Commun. Phys.
7
,
368
(
2024
).
376.
S.
Yin
,
E.
Galiffi
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Floquet metamaterials
,”
eLight
2
,
8
(
2022
).
377.
I.
Martin
,
G.
Refael
, and
B.
Halperin
, “
Topological frequency conversion in strongly driven quantum systems
,”
Phys. Rev. X
7
,
041008
(
2017
).
378.
S. K.
Sridhar
,
S.
Ghosh
,
D.
Srinivasan
,
A. R.
Miller
, and
A.
Dutt
, “
Quantized topological pumping in Floquet synthetic dimensions with a driven dissipative photonic molecule
,”
Nat. Phys.
20
,
843
(
2024
).
379.
M.
Wu
,
Q.
Zhao
,
L.
Kang
,
M.
Weng
,
Z.
Chi
,
R.
Peng
,
J.
Liu
,
D. H.
Werner
,
Y.
Meng
, and
J.
Zhou
, “
Evidencing non-Bloch dynamics in temporal topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
064307
(
2023
).
380.
D. J.
Thouless
, “
Quantization of particle transport
,”
Phys. Rev. B
27
,
6083
(
1983
).
381.
Q.
Niu
and
D. J.
Thouless
, “
Quantised adiabatic charge transport in the presence of substrate disorder and many-body interaction
,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.
17
,
2453
(
1984
).
382.
Z.
Wang
,
Y.
Biao
,
X.-T.
Zeng
,
X.
Chen
,
X.-L.
Sheng
,
S. A.
Yang
, and
R.
Yu
, “
Realization in circuits of a Chern state with an arbitrary Chern number
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
L201101
(
2023
).
383.
M.
Wu
,
M.
Weng
,
Z.
Chi
,
Y.
Qi
,
H.
Li
,
Q.
Zhao
,
Y.
Meng
, and
J.
Zhou
, “
Observing relative homotopic degeneracy conversions with circuit metamaterials
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
,
016605
(
2024
).
384.
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Yuan
,
N.
Sun
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of novel topological states in hyperbolic lattices
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
2937
(
2022
).
385.
I.
Boettcher
,
A. V.
Gorshkov
,
A. J.
Kollár
,
J.
Maciejko
,
S.
Rayan
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Crystallography of hyperbolic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
125118
(
2022
).
386.
D. M.
Urwyler
,
P. M.
Lenggenhager
,
I.
Boettcher
,
R.
Thomale
,
T.
Neupert
, and
T.
Bzdušek
, “
Hyperbolic topological band insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
129
,
246402
(
2022
).
387.
C.
Lv
and
Q.
Zhou
, “
Hidden curved spaces in Bosonic Kitaev model
,” (
2024
).
388.
Y.-L.
Tao
and
Y.
Xu
, “
Higher-order topological hyperbolic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
184201
(
2023
).
389.
T.
Bzdušek
and
J.
Maciejko
, “
Flat bands and band-touching from real-space topology in hyperbolic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
155146
(
2022
).
390.
S.
Dey
,
A.
Chen
,
P.
Basteiro
,
A.
Fritzsche
,
M.
Greiter
,
M.
Kaminski
,
P. M.
Lenggenhager
,
R.
Meyer
,
R.
Sorbello
,
A.
Stegmaier
,
R.
Thomale
,
J.
Erdmenger
, and
I.
Boettcher
, “
Simulating holographic conformal field theories on hyperbolic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
133
,
061603
(
2024
).
391.
H.
Yuan
,
W.
Zhang
,
Q.
Pei
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Hyperbolic topological flat bands
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
L041109
(
2024
).
392.
A. J.
Kollár
,
M.
Fitzpatrick
, and
A. A.
Houck
, “
Hyperbolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics
,”
Nature
571
,
45
(
2019
).
393.
Z.-R.
Liu
,
C.-B.
Hua
,
T.
Peng
, and
B.
Zhou
, “
Chern insulator in a hyperbolic lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
245301
(
2022
).
394.
S.
Yu
,
X.
Piao
, and
N.
Park
, “
Topological hyperbolic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
,
053901
(
2020
).
395.
J.
Maciejko
and
S.
Rayan
, “
Hyperbolic band theory
,”
Sci. Adv.
7
,
eabe9170
(
2021
).
396.

The opposite constraint (p − 2)(q − 2) < 4 gives the five possibilities {p, q} = {3, 5}, {5, 3}, {3, 4}, {4, 3}, {3, 3}, respectively corresponding to the five platonic solids, i.e., icosahedron, dodecahedron, octahedron, cube and tetrahedron, all tiling the sphere.

397.
Q.
Chen
,
Z.
Zhang
,
H.
Qin
,
A.
Bossart
,
Y.
Yang
,
H.
Chen
, and
R.
Fleury
, “
Anomalous and Chern topological waves in hyperbolic networks
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
2293
(
2024
).
398.
R.
Shen
,
W. J.
Chan
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Non-Hermitian skin effect along hyperbolic geodesics
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
045420
(
2025
).
399.
C. H.
Lee
,
Y.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Electromagnetic response of quantum Hall systems in dimensions five and six and beyond
,”
Phys. Rev. B
98
,
094434
(
2018
).
400.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Higher-order topological electric circuits and topological corner resonance on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
98
,
201402
(
2018
).
401.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Non-Hermitian higher-order topological states in nonreciprocal and reciprocal systems with their electric-circuit realization
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
201411
(
2019
).
402.
P. M.
Lenggenhager
,
A.
Stegmaier
,
L. K.
Upreti
,
T.
Hofmann
,
T.
Helbig
,
A.
Vollhardt
,
M.
Greiter
,
C. H.
Lee
,
S.
Imhof
,
H.
Brand
,
T.
Kießling
,
I.
Boettcher
,
T.
Neupert
,
R.
Thomale
, and
T.
Bzdušek
, “
Simulating hyperbolic space on a circuit board
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
4373
(
2022
).
403.
Q.
Pei
,
H.
Yuan
,
W.
Zhang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Engineering boundary-dominated topological states in defective hyperbolic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
165145
(
2023
).
404.
S.
Pai
and
A.
Prem
, “
Topological states on fractal lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
155135
(
2019
).
405.
X.-L.
Qi
, “
Exact holographic mapping and emergent space-time geometry
,” (
2013
).
406.
Y.
Gu
,
C. H.
Lee
,
X.
Wen
,
G. Y.
Cho
,
S.
Ryu
, and
X.-L.
Qi
, “
Holographic duality between (2 + 1)-dimensional quantum anomalous Hall state and (3 + 1)-dimensional topological insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. B
94
,
125107
(
2016
).
407.
C. H.
Lee
and
X.-L.
Qi
, “
Exact holographic mapping in free fermion systems
,”
Phys. Rev. B
93
,
035112
(
2016
).
408.
C. H.
Lee
, “
Generalized exact holographic mapping with wavelets
,”
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
245103
(
2017
).
409.
J.
Chen
,
F.
Chen
,
L.
Yang
,
Y.
Yang
,
Z.
Chen
,
Y.
Wu
,
Y.
Meng
,
B.
Yan
,
X.
Xi
,
Z.
Zhu
et al, “
AdS/CFT correspondence in hyperbolic lattices
,” (
2023
).
410.
R. C.
Brower
,
C. V.
Cogburn
, and
E.
Owen
, “
Hyperbolic lattice for scalar field theory in AdS3
,”
Phys. Rev. D
105
,
114503
(
2022
).
411.
X.-L.
Qi
and
Z.
Yang
, “
Space-time random tensor networks and holographic duality
,” (
2018
).
412.
Y.
Biao
and
R.
Yu
, “
Realization of ideal unconventional Weyl states with arbitrary topological charge
,”
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
165128
(
2023
).
413.
S.
Bao
,
J.
Chang
,
J.
Wu
, and
Z.
Xu
, “
Circuit realization of Möbius insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. A
108
,
013508
(
2023
).
414.
M.
Röntgen
,
X.
Chen
,
W.
Gao
,
M.
Pyzh
,
P.
Schmelcher
,
V.
Pagneux
,
V.
Achilleos
, and
A.
Coutant
, “
Topological states protected by hidden symmetry
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
035106
(
2024
).
415.
L.
Song
,
H.
Yang
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Realization of the square-root higher-order topological insulator in electric circuits
,”
Nano Lett.
20
,
7566
(
2020
).
416.
H.
Sahin
,
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
J. F.
Kong
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
N-th root topological lattices
,” in
IEEE Magnetics—The 2021 Around-the-Clock Around-the-Globe Magnetics Conference
(
IEEE
,
2021
), p.
44
.
417.
M.
Yan
,
X.
Huang
,
L.
Luo
,
J.
Lu
,
W.
Deng
, and
Z.
Liu
, “
Acoustic square-root topological states
,”
Phys. Rev. B
102
,
180102
(
2020
).
418.
M.
Kremer
,
I.
Petrides
,
E.
Meyer
,
M.
Heinrich
,
O.
Zilberberg
, and
A.
Szameit
, “
A square-root topological insulator with non-quantized indices realized with photonic Aharonov-Bohm cages
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
907
(
2020
).
419.
M.
Ezawa
, “
Systematic construction of square-root topological insulators and superconductors
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
033397
(
2020
).
420.
A. M.
Marques
and
R. G.
Dias
, “
2n-root weak, Chern, and higher-order topological insulators, and 2n-root topological semimetals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
104
,
165410
(
2021
).
421.
L.
Zhou
,
R. W.
Bomantara
, and
S.
Wu
, “
qth-root non-Hermitian Floquet topological insulators
,”
SciPost Phys.
13
,
015
(
2022
).
422.
S.
Guo
,
G.
Pan
,
J.
Huang
,
R.
Huang
,
F.
Zhuang
,
S.
Su
,
Z.
Lin
,
W.
Qiu
, and
Q.
Kan
, “
Realization of the square-root higher-order topology in decorated Su–Schrieffer–Heeger electric circuits
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
123
,
043102
(
2023
).
423.
R.
Wei
,
Q.
Zhang
,
D.
Yang
,
X.
Huang
,
Q.
Pan
,
J.
Kang
,
J.
Qiu
,
Z.
Yang
, and
G.
Dong
, “
Realization of one-dimensional 2n-root topological states in photonic lattices
,”
Sci. China: Technol. Sci.
67
,
98
(
2023
).
424.
A. M.
Marques
and
R. G.
Dias
, “
Generalized Lieb’s theorem for noninteracting non-Hermitian n -partite tight-binding lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
205146
(
2022
).
425.
R.
Zhang
,
Q.
Wu
,
M.
Liu
,
X.
Xiao
, and
Z.
Liu
, “
Complex–real transformation of eigenenergies and topological edge states in square‐root non‐Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Ann. Phys.
534
,
2100497
(
2022
).
426.
W.
Deng
,
T.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
N th power root topological phases in Hermitian and non-Hermitian systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
4
,
033109
(
2022
).
427.
S.
Guo
,
J.
Huang
,
R.
Huang
,
F.
Zhuang
,
Z.
Lin
, and
W.
Qiu
, “
Multiple boundary states in bilayer and decorated Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-like models
,”
Phys. Lett. A
532
,
130209
(
2025
).
428.
L.
Luo
,
J.
Gao
,
Q.
Shi
,
M.
Zhang
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Huang
,
J.
Peng
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Exploring multifrequency bound states in the continuum in square-root topological circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
045152
(
2025
).
429.
J.
Arkinstall
,
M. H.
Teimourpour
,
L.
Feng
,
R.
El-Ganainy
, and
H.
Schomerus
, “
Topological tight-binding models from nontrivial square roots
,”
Phys. Rev. B
95
,
165109
(
2017
).
430.
A. M.
Marques
,
L.
Madail
, and
R. G.
Dias
, “
One-dimensional 2n-root topological insulators and superconductors
,”
Phys. Rev. B
103
,
235425
(
2021
).
431.
L.
Song
,
H.
Yang
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Square-root higher-order Weyl semimetals
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
5601
(
2022
).
432.
X.
Zhou
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of flat-band localization and topological edge states induced by effective strong interactions in electrical circuit networks
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
035152
(
2023
).
433.
H.
Yang
,
L.
Song
,
Y.
Cao
, and
P.
Yan
, “
Realization of Wilson fermions in topolectrical circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
211
(
2023
).
434.
Z.
Wang
,
X.-T.
Zeng
,
Y.
Biao
,
Z.
Yan
, and
R.
Yu
, “
Realization of a Hopf insulator in circuit systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
130
,
057201
(
2023
).
435.
H.
Wang
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of non-Abelian Anderson localization and transition in topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
144203
(
2023
).
436.
B.
Xie
,
W.
Deng
,
J.
Lu
,
H.
Liu
,
P.
Lai
,
H.
Cheng
,
Z.
Liu
, and
S.
Chen
, “
Correspondence between real-space topology and spectral flows at disclinations
,”
Phys. Rev. B
108
,
134118
(
2023
).
437.
S.
Qiu
,
J.
Hu
,
Y.
Yang
,
C.
Shang
,
S.
Liu
, and
T. J.
Cui
, “
Octupole topological insulating phase protected by three-dimensional momentum-space nonsymmorphic group
,”
Natl. Sci. Rev.
nwaf137 (published online)
(
2025
).
438.
X.
Xie
,
F.
Ma
,
W. B.
Rui
,
Z.
Dong
,
Y.
Du
,
W.
Xie
,
Y. X.
Zhao
,
H.
Chen
,
F.
Gao
, and
H.
Xue
, “
Non-Hermitian Dirac cones with valley-dependent lifetimes
,”
Nat. Commun.
16
,
1627
(
2025
).
439.
W.
Lin
,
B.
Ruan
,
C.
Liu
,
X.
Dai
, and
Y.
Xiang
, “
Evolution of topological extended state in multidimensional non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
125
,
173104
(
2024
).
440.
J.
He
,
H.
Jia
,
H.
Chen
,
T.
Wang
,
S.
Liu
,
J.
Cao
,
Z.
Gao
,
C.
Shang
, and
T. J.
Cui
, “
Mode engineering in reconfigurable fractal topological circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
235406
(
2024
).
441.
D.
Zou
,
N.
Pan
,
T.
Chen
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Experimental simulation of topological quantum computing with classical circuits
,”
Adv. Intell. Syst.
5
,
2300354
(
2023
).
442.
J.
Zhang
,
T.
Chen
,
W.
Deng
,
X.
Tong
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Quantum 2-player games and realizations with circuits
,”
Research
7
,
0480
(
2024
).
443.
M. Z.
Hasan
,
G.
Chang
,
I.
Belopolski
,
G.
Bian
,
S.-Y.
Xu
, and
J.-X.
Yin
, “
Weyl, Dirac and high-fold chiral fermions in topological quantum matter
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
6
,
784
(
2021
).
444.
B.
Yan
and
C.
Felser
, “
Topological materials: Weyl semimetals
,”
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
8
,
337
(
2017
).
445.
Z.
Wang
,
D.
Gresch
,
A. A.
Soluyanov
,
W.
Xie
,
S.
Kushwaha
,
X.
Dai
,
M.
Troyer
,
R. J.
Cava
, and
B. A.
Bernevig
, “
MoTe2: A Type-II Weyl topological metal
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
117
,
056805
(
2016
).
446.
K.
Koepernik
,
D.
Kasinathan
,
D. V.
Efremov
,
S.
Khim
,
S.
Borisenko
,
B.
Büchner
, and
J.
Van Den Brink
, “
TaIrTe4: A ternary type-II Weyl semimetal
,”
Phys. Rev. B
93
,
201101
(
2016
).
447.
J. Y.
Lin
,
N. C.
Hu
,
Y. J.
Chen
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Line nodes, Dirac points, and Lifshitz transition in two-dimensional nonsymmorphic photonic crystals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
075438
(
2017
).
448.
A. A.
Soluyanov
,
D.
Gresch
,
Z.
Wang
,
Q.
Wu
,
M.
Troyer
,
X.
Dai
, and
B. A.
Bernevig
, “
Type-II Weyl semimetals
,”
Nature
527
,
495
(
2015
).
449.
Z.-Q.
Jiao
,
J.
Gao
,
W.-H.
Zhou
,
X.-W.
Wang
,
R.-J.
Ren
,
X.-Y.
Xu
,
L.-F.
Qiao
,
Y.
Wang
, and
X.-M.
Jin
, “
Two-dimensional quantum walks of correlated photons
,”
Optica
8
,
1129
(
2021
).
450.
C.
Nayak
,
S. H.
Simon
,
A.
Stern
,
M.
Freedman
, and
S.
Das Sarma
, “
Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
80
,
1083
(
2008
).
451.
A.
Bouhon
,
Q.
Wu
,
R.-J.
Slager
,
H.
Weng
,
O. V.
Yazyev
, and
T.
Bzdušek
, “
Non-Abelian reciprocal braiding of Weyl points and its manifestation in ZrTe
,”
Nat. Phys.
16
,
1137
(
2020
).
452.
A.
Bouhon
,
A. M.
Black-Schaffer
, and
R.-J.
Slager
, “
Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topological crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry
,”
Phys. Rev. B
100
,
195135
(
2019
).
453.
Y.
Yang
,
B.
Yang
,
G.
Ma
,
J.
Li
,
S.
Zhang
, and
C. T.
Chan
, “
Non-Abelian physics in light and sound
,”
Science
383
,
eadf9621
(
2024
).
454.
Q.
Wu
,
A. A.
Soluyanov
, and
T.
Bzdušek
, “
Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals
,”
Science
365
,
1273
(
2019
).
455.
W.
Tang
,
K.
Ding
, and
G.
Ma
, “
Experimental realization of non-Abelian permutations in a three-state non-Hermitian system
,”
Natl. Sci. Rev.
9
,
nwac010
(
2022
).
456.
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Yuan
,
H.
Wang
,
F.
Di
,
N.
Sun
,
X.
Zheng
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of Bloch oscillations dominated by effective anyonic particle statistics
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
2392
(
2022
).
457.
Z.-G.
Chen
,
R.-Y.
Zhang
,
C. T.
Chan
, and
G.
Ma
, “
Classical non-Abelian braiding of acoustic modes
,”
Nat. Phys.
18
,
179
(
2022
).
458.
W.
Zhang
,
L.
Qian
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Anyonic bound states in the continuum
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
139
(
2023
).
459.
X.
Zhou
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Yuan
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Bloch oscillations of Fibonacci anyons
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
094301
(
2024
).
460.
X.
Zhou
,
W.
Zhang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Anyonic topological flat bands
,”
Front. Phys.
20
,
024205
(
2025
).
461.
Y.
Qin
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
L.
Li
, “
Dynamical suppression of many-body non-Hermitian skin effect in anyonic systems
,”
Commun. Phys.
8
,
18
(
2025
).
462.
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Wang
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Non-Abelian inverse Anderson transitions
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
130
,
206401
(
2023
).
463.
J. C. Y.
Teo
and
T. L.
Hughes
, “
Topological defects in symmetry-protected topological phases
,”
Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.
8
,
211
(
2017
).
464.
Z.
Xu
,
B.
Ruan
,
Y.
Xiang
, and
X.
Dai
, “
Topolectrical circuit sensor with the chiral disclination states
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
25
,
1
(
2025
).
465.
R.
Li
,
R.
Banerjee
,
S.
Mandal
,
D.
Li
,
Y.
Long
,
T.
Ma
,
J.
Liu
,
G.-G.
Liu
,
Y.
Chong
,
B.
Zhang
, and
E.-P.
Li
, “
Observation of non-Hermitian topological disclination states and charge fractionalization
,” (
2025
).
466.
J.
Liu
,
W.-W.
Jin
,
Z.-F.
Cai
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.-R.
Zhang
,
X.
Wei
,
W.
Ju
,
Z.
Yang
, and
T.
Liu
, “
Experimental observation of topological disclination states in lossy electric circuits
,” (
2025
).
467.
C. W.
Hsu
,
B.
Zhen
,
A. D.
Stone
,
J. D.
Joannopoulos
, and
M.
Soljačić
, “
Bound states in the continuum
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
1
,
16048
(
2016
).
468.
D. C.
Marinica
,
A. G.
Borisov
, and
S. V.
Shabanov
, “
Bound states in the continuum in photonics
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
,
183902
(
2008
).
469.
M.
Kang
,
T.
Liu
,
C. T.
Chan
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Applications of bound states in the continuum in photonics
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
5
,
659
(
2023
).
470.
H.
Nasari
,
G. G.
Pyrialakos
,
D. N.
Christodoulides
, and
M.
Khajavikhan
, “
Non-Hermitian topological photonics
,”
Opt. Mater. Express
13
,
870
(
2023
).
471.
Z.
Guo
,
J.
Jiang
,
H.
Jiang
,
J.
Ren
, and
H.
Chen
, “
Observation of topological bound states in a double Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain composed of split ring resonators
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
3
,
013122
(
2021
).
472.
H.-Y.
Wang
,
J.
Li
,
W.-M.
Liu
,
L.
Wen
, and
X.-F.
Zhang
, “
Exotic localization for the two body bound states in the non-reciprocal Hubbard model
,” (
2024
).
473.
J.
Wang
,
S.
Valligatla
,
Y.
Yin
,
L.
Schwarz
,
M.
Medina-Sánchez
,
S.
Baunack
,
C. H.
Lee
,
R.
Thomale
,
S.
Li
,
V. M.
Fomin
,
L.
Ma
, and
O. G.
Schmidt
, “
Experimental observation of Berry phases in optical Möbius-strip microcavities
,”
Nat. Photonics
17
,
120
(
2023
).
474.
B.
Xie
,
H.-X.
Wang
,
X.
Zhang
,
P.
Zhan
,
J.-H.
Jiang
,
M.
Lu
, and
Y.
Chen
, “
Higher-order band topology
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
3
,
520
(
2021
).
475.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Valley Hall effect and kink states in topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
5
,
013107
(
2023
).
476.
Y.
Zhang
,
W.
Sui
,
Z.
Zhang
,
H.
Zhang
, and
B.
Yang
, “
Effects of structure parameters on kink states of two-dimensional valley photonic crystals
,”
Comput. Mater. Sci.
230
,
112498
(
2023
).
477.
K.
Behnia
, “
Polarized light boosts valleytronics
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
7
,
488
(
2012
).
478.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Valley and spin quantum Hall conductance of silicene coupled to a ferroelectric layer
,”
Front. Phys.
10
,
1021192
(
2022
).
479.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Conductance modulation and spin/valley polarized transmission in silicene coupled with ferroelectric layer
,”
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
571
,
170559
(
2023
).
480.
Z. B.
Siu
and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Valley transport in strained silicene heterojunctions with zigzag and armchair interfaces
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
122
,
043103
(
2023
).
481.
R.
Li
,
W.
Wang
,
X.
Kong
,
B.
Lv
,
Y.
Jia
,
H.
Tao
,
P.
Li
, and
Y.
Liu
, “
Realization of a non-Hermitian Haldane model in circuits
,” (
2025
).
482.
W.
Wang
,
X.
Wang
, and
G.
Ma
, “
Non-Hermitian morphing of topological modes
,”
Nature
608
,
50
(
2022
).
483.
Z.-F.
Cai
,
Y.-C.
Wang
, and
T.
Liu
, “
Nonlinearity-driven morphing and control of topological modes in non-Hermitian systems
,” (
2024
).
484.
K.
Bai
,
L.
Fang
,
T.-R.
Liu
,
J.-Z.
Li
,
D.
Wan
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Nonlinearity-enabled higher-order exceptional singularities with ultra-enhanced signal-to-noise ratio
,”
Natl. Sci. Rev.
10
,
nwac259
(
2023
).
485.
Z.
Lu
,
X.
Chen
,
Y.
Hu
,
J.
Wu
,
J.
Lu
,
X.
Huang
,
W.
Deng
, and
Z.
Liu
, “
Extended states isolated in the band gap in non-Hermitian electrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
21
,
034043
(
2024
).
486.
C.
Liu
,
B.
Ruan
,
W.
Hu
,
W.
Lin
,
X.
Dai
,
J.
Wu
,
L.
Jiang
, and
Y.
Xiang
, “
Extended state reshaping in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
21
,
054013
(
2024
).
487.
B.
Ruan
,
X.
Dai
, and
Y.
Xiang
, “
Interlayer coupling induced extended state in a localized continuum of non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
235102
(
2024
).
488.
J.
Li
,
C.
Xu
,
Z.
Xu
,
G.
Xu
,
S.
Yang
,
K.
Liu
,
J.
Chen
,
T.
Li
, and
C.-W.
Qiu
, “
Localized and delocalized topological modes of heat
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
121
,
e2408843121
(
2024
).
489.
S.
Manna
and
B.
Roy
, “
Inner skin effects on non-Hermitian topological fractals
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
10
(
2023
).
490.
J.
Sun
,
C.-A.
Li
,
P.
Li
,
S.
Feng
, and
H.
Guo
, “
Inner non-Hermitian skin effect on the Bethe lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
075120
(
2025
).
491.
J.
Sun
,
C.-A.
Li
,
Q.
Guo
,
W.
Zhang
,
S.
Feng
,
X.
Zhang
,
H.
Guo
, and
B.
Trauzettel
, “
Non-Hermitian quantum fractals
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
L201103
(
2024
).
492.
K.
Bai
,
J.-Z.
Li
,
T.-R.
Liu
,
L.
Fang
,
D.
Wan
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Arbitrarily configurable nonlinear topological modes
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
133
,
116602
(
2024
).
493.
T.
Ji
,
N.
Pan
,
T.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Fast quantum search of multiple vertices based on electric circuits
,”
Quantum Inf. Process.
21
,
172
(
2022
).
494.
N.
Pan
,
T.
Chen
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Electric-circuit realization of fast quantum search
,”
Research
2021
,
1
.
495.
Y.
Zhang
,
T.
Chen
,
X.
Tong
,
N.
Pan
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
A new type of classical logic circuit with exponential speedup
,”
Adv. Intell. Syst.
5
,
2200232
(
2023
).
496.
B.
Liu
,
Y.
Li
,
B.
Yang
,
X.
Shen
,
Y.
Yang
,
Z. H.
Hang
, and
M.
Ezawa
, “
Experimental observation of non-Hermitian higher-order skin interface states in topological electric circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
5
,
043034
(
2023
).
497.
Q.
Zhang
,
L.
Zhao
,
X.
Liu
,
X.
Feng
,
L.
Xiong
,
W.
Wu
, and
C.
Qiu
, “
Experimental characterization of three-band braid relations in non-Hermitian acoustic lattices
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
5
,
L022050
(
2023
).
498.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Emergence and full 3D-imaging of nodal boundary Seifert surfaces in 4D topological matter
,”
Commun. Phys.
2
,
135
(
2019
).
499.
T.
Tai
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Anisotropic nonlinear optical response of nodal-loop materials
,”
Phys. Rev. B
103
,
195125
(
2021
).
500.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
M. S. H.
Razo
,
H.
Sahin
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
From knots to exceptional points: Emergence of topological features in non-Hermitian systems with long-range coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
045444
(
2024
).
501.
S. M.
Rafi-Ul-Islam
,
Z. B.
Siu
,
H.
Sahin
,
M. S. H.
Razo
, and
M. B. A.
Jalil
, “
Twisted topology of non-Hermitian systems induced by long-range coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
045410
(
2024
).
502.
C. H.
Lee
,
A.
Sutrisno
,
T.
Hofmann
,
T.
Helbig
,
Y.
Liu
,
Y. S.
Ang
,
L. K.
Ang
,
X.
Zhang
,
M.
Greiter
, and
R.
Thomale
, “
Imaging nodal knots in momentum space through topolectrical circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
4385
(
2020
).
503.
B.
Bode
and
M. R.
Dennis
, “
Constructing a polynomial whose nodal set is any prescribed knot or link
,”
J. Knot Theory Ramifications
28
,
1850082
(
2019
).
504.
M. R.
Dennis
,
R. P.
King
,
B.
Jack
,
K.
O’Holleran
, and
M. J.
Padgett
, “
Isolated optical vortex knots
,”
Nat. Phys.
6
,
118
(
2010
).
505.
B.
Bode
,
M. R.
Dennis
,
D.
Foster
, and
R. P.
King
, “
Knotted fields and explicit fibrations for lemniscate knots
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
473
,
20160829
(
2017
).
506.
W.
Gilpin
, “
Generative learning for nonlinear dynamics
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
6
,
194
(
2024
).
507.
S.
Panahi
,
L.-W.
Kong
,
M.
Moradi
,
Z.-M.
Zhai
,
B.
Glaz
,
M.
Haile
, and
Y.-C.
Lai
, “
Machine learning prediction of tipping in complex dynamical systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
6
,
043194
(
2024
).
508.
F.
Noé
,
A.
Tkatchenko
,
K.-R.
Müller
, and
C.
Clementi
, “
Machine learning for molecular simulation
,”
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
71
,
361
(
2020
).
509.
X.
Chen
,
J.
Sun
,
X.
Wang
,
H.
Jiang
,
D.
Zhu
, and
X.
Zhou
, “
Deep learning for the design of non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
094103
(
2024
).
510.
X.
Chen
,
J.
Sun
,
X.
Wang
,
M.
Chen
,
Q.
Lin
,
M.
Xia
, and
X.
Zhou
, “
Composable generation strategy framework enabled bidirectional design on topological circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
134108
(
2024
).
511.
M.
Di Ventra
,
Y. V.
Pershin
, and
C.-C.
Chien
, “
Custodial chiral symmetry in a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger electrical circuit with memory
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
097701
(
2022
).
512.
D. B.
Strukov
,
G. S.
Snider
,
D. R.
Stewart
, and
R. S.
Williams
, “
The missing memristor found
,”
Nature
453
,
80
(
2008
).
513.
S.
Guo
,
J.
Huang
,
R.
Huang
,
F.
Zhuang
,
S.
Su
,
Z.
Lin
,
W.
Qiu
,
J.
Su
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Realization of higher-order topology in bilayer asymmetric Su–Schrieffer–Heeger topological electric circuits
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
124
,
073104
(
2024
).
514.
W.
Zhang
,
F.
Di
,
X.
Zheng
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Hyperbolic band topology with non-trivial second Chern numbers
,”
Nat. Commun.
14
,
1083
(
2023
).
515.
R.
Yu
,
Y. X.
Zhao
, and
A. P.
Schnyder
, “
4D spinless topological insulator in a periodic electric circuit
,”
Natl. Sci. Rev.
7
,
1288
(
2020
).
516.
A.
Banerjee
,
A.
Bandyopadhyay
,
R.
Sarkar
, and
A.
Narayan
, “
Non-Hermitian topology and flat bands via an exact real-space decimation scheme
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
085431
(
2024
).
517.
Y.
Biao
,
Z.
Yan
, and
R.
Yu
, “
Experimental observation of boundary flat bands with topological spin textures
,”
Phys. Rev. B
110
,
L241110
(
2024
).
518.
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Yuan
,
W.
He
,
X.
Zheng
,
N.
Sun
,
F.
Di
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of interaction-induced phenomena of relativistic quantum mechanics
,”
Commun. Phys.
4
,
250
(
2021
).
519.
W.
Zhu
,
Y.
Long
,
H.
Chen
, and
J.
Ren
, “
Quantum valley Hall effects and spin-valley locking in topological Kane-Mele circuit networks
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
115410
(
2019
).
520.
X.-X.
Zhang
and
M.
Franz
, “
Non-Hermitian exceptional landau quantization in electric circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
046401
(
2020
).
521.
Y.
Kim
,
H. C.
Park
,
M.
Kyung
,
K.
Lee
,
J.-W.
Ryu
,
O.
You
,
S.
Zhang
,
B.
Min
, and
M. J.
Park
, “
Realization of non-Hermitian Hopf bundle matter
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
273
(
2023
).
522.
H.
Wang
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Observation of inverse Anderson transitions in Aharonov-Bohm topolectrical circuits
,”
Phys. Rev. B
106
,
104203
(
2022
).
523.
L.
Qian
,
W.
Zhang
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Non-Abelian topological bound states in the continuum
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
,
046601
(
2024
).
524.
X.
Ni
,
Z.
Xiao
,
A. B.
Khanikaev
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Robust multiplexing with topolectrical higher-order Chern insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
13
,
064031
(
2020
).
525.
R.
Shen
,
T.
Chen
,
B.
Yang
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Observation of the non-Hermitian skin effect and Fermi skin on a digital quantum computer
,”
Nat. Commun.
16
,
1340
(
2025
).
526.
W.
Zhang
,
D.
Zou
,
Q.
Pei
,
W.
He
,
H.
Sun
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Moiré circuits: Engineering magic-angle behavior
,”
Phys. Rev. B
104
,
L201408
(
2021
).
527.
J.
Sun
,
X.
Chen
,
X.
Wang
,
D.
Zhu
, and
X.
Zhou
, “
Self-reasoning assisted learning for non-Abelian gauge fields design
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
094111
(
2025
).
528.
T.
Jiang
,
Q.
Guo
,
R.-Y.
Zhang
,
Z.-Q.
Zhang
,
B.
Yang
, and
C. T.
Chan
, “
Four-band non-Abelian topological insulator and its experimental realization
,”
Nat. Commun.
12
,
6471
(
2021
).
529.
X.
Ni
and
A.
Alù
, “
Higher-order topolectrical semimetal realized via synthetic gauge fields
,”
APL Photonics
6
,
050802
(
2021
).
530.
P.
Wang
,
L.
Jin
, and
Z.
Song
, “
Berry curvature inside a PT -symmetry protected exceptional surface
,”
Phys. Rev. B
109
,
115406
(
2024
).
531.
N.
Pan
,
T.
Chen
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Nested chirality and multimode transfer around exceptional points driven by external forces in electric circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
8
,
53
(
2025
).
532.
J.
Li
,
Y.
Yang
, and
C.-M.
Hu
, “
Multichannel coupling induced topological insulating phases with full multimerization
,”
Photonics Res.
12
,
491
(
2024
).
533.
L.
Chua
, “
Memristor-the missing circuit element
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory
18
,
507
(
1971
).
534.
S.
Jain
,
S.
Li
,
H.
Zheng
,
L.
Li
,
X.
Fong
, and
K.-W.
Ang
, “
Heterogeneous integration of 2D memristor arrays and silicon selectors for compute-in-memory hardware in convolutional neural networks
,”
Nat. Commun.
16
,
2719
(
2025
).
535.
T. D.
Brown
,
A.
Zhang
,
F. U.
Nitta
,
E. D.
Grant
,
J. L.
Chong
,
J.
Zhu
,
S.
Radhakrishnan
,
M.
Islam
,
E. J.
Fuller
,
A. A.
Talin
,
P. J.
Shamberger
,
E.
Pop
,
R. S.
Williams
, and
S.
Kumar
, “
Axon-like active signal transmission
,”
Nature
633
,
804
(
2024
).
536.
S.
Longhi
, “
Non-Hermitian skin effect and self-acceleration
,”
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
245143
(
2022
).
537.
B.
Zhang
,
Q.
Li
,
X.
Zhang
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Real non-Hermitian energy spectra without any symmetry
,”
Chin. Phys. B
31
,
070308
(
2022
).
538.
Z.
Gu
,
H.
Gao
,
H.
Xue
,
J.
Li
,
Z.
Su
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Transient non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
7668
(
2022
).
539.
R.
Shen
,
T.
Chen
,
M. M.
Aliyu
,
F.
Qin
,
Y.
Zhong
,
H.
Loh
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Proposal for observing Yang-Lee criticality in Rydberg atomic arrays
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
131
,
080403
(
2023
).
540.
F.
Qin
,
R.
Shen
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Non-Hermitian squeezed polarons
,”
Phys. Rev. A
107
,
L010202
(
2023
).
541.
F.
Qin
,
R.
Shen
,
L.
Li
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Kinked linear response from non-Hermitian cold-atom pumping
,”
Phys. Rev. A
109
,
053311
(
2024
).
542.
Z.
Li
,
L.-W.
Wang
,
X.
Wang
,
Z.-K.
Lin
,
G.
Ma
, and
J.-H.
Jiang
, “
Observation of dynamic non-Hermitian skin effects
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
6544
(
2024
).
543.
H.
Wang
,
J.
Zhong
, and
S.
Fan
, “
Non-Hermitian photonic band winding and skin effects: A tutorial
,”
Adv. Opt. Photonics
16
,
659
(
2024
).
544.
J.
Gliozzi
,
G.
De Tomasi
, and
T. L.
Hughes
, “
Many-body non-Hermitian skin effect for multipoles
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
133
,
136503
(
2024
).
545.
T.
Yoshida
,
S.-B.
Zhang
,
T.
Neupert
, and
N.
Kawakami
, “
Non-Hermitian mott skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
133
,
076502
(
2024
).
546.
G.-G.
Liu
,
S.
Mandal
,
P.
Zhou
,
X.
Xi
,
R.
Banerjee
,
Y.-H.
Hu
,
M.
Wei
,
M.
Wang
,
Q.
Wang
,
Z.
Gao
,
H.
Chen
,
Y.
Yang
,
Y.
Chong
, and
B.
Zhang
, “
Localization of chiral edge states by the non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
,
113802
(
2024
).
547.
E.
Zhao
,
Z.
Wang
,
C.
He
,
T. F. J.
Poon
,
K. K.
Pak
,
Y.-J.
Liu
,
P.
Ren
,
X.-J.
Liu
, and
G.-B.
Jo
, “
Two-dimensional non-Hermitian skin effect in an ultracold Fermi gas
,”
Nature
637
,
565
(
2025
).
548.
S.
Hamanaka
and
K.
Kawabata
, “
Multifractality of the many-body non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. B
111
,
035144
(
2025
).
549.
R.
Shen
,
F.
Qin
,
J.-Y.
Desaules
,
Z.
Papić
, and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Enhanced many-body quantum scars from the non-Hermitian Fock skin effect
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
133
,
216601
(
2024
).
550.
M.
Yang
and
C. H.
Lee
, “
Percolation-induced P T symmetry breaking
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
133
,
136602
(
2024
).
551.
Y.
Kim
,
S.
Verma
,
M.
Kyung
,
K.
Lee
,
W.
Liu
,
S.
Zhang
,
B.
Min
, and
M. J.
Park
, “
Boundary-driven complex Brillouin zone in non-Hermitian electric circuits
,” (
2025
).
552.
L.
Wang
,
W.
Lin
,
B.
Ruan
,
Y.
Xiang
, and
X.
Dai
, “
Tunable higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect in the SSH topolectrical circuits
,”
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
37
,
185001
(
2025
).