We design and theoretically model a highly sensitive pressure sensor based on lossy mode resonance with a microstructure fiber. The microstructure fiber sensor is manufactured with an exposed-core photonics crystal fiber, on which a TiO2/HfO2/rubber polymer trilayer is coated. Using the sensitive film as a sensing channel avoids filling the air holes with liquid. Strong birefringence with x-polarized and y-polarized peaks is generated because of the asymmetric sensing region. The y-polarization has a higher coupling efficiency and the sensitivity of the y-polarized peak is higher than that of the x-polarization. An extremely high refractive index (RI) sensitivity 67 000 nm/RIU is obtained in the sensing range of 1.33–1.39. The TiO2/HfO2 bilayer film dramatically increases the pressure sensitivity of the sensor to a peak of 5.0μm/MPa, which is 2.5 times more sensitive than previously reported lossy mode resonance (LMR) sensors. In addition, the performance of the sensor is optimized by adjusting the type and thickness of the film. This paper provides a reference for developing a microstructure pressure sensor based on lossy mode resonance.

Pressure sensors based on an optical fiber have been the subject of extensive research in recent years because optical fiber has a great many advantages over conventional electrical pressure sensors, such as a light weight and anti-electromagnetic interference.1,2 Recently, a series of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) pressure fiber sensors have been proposed in the literature.3–6 The light interaction between a metal and a dielectric interface generates a plasmon oscillation.7 The optical fiber SPR sensor has been utilized in detecting pressure, where maximum sensitivity reaches 1.75 × 103 nm/MPa.8 Compared with sensors based on a Sagnac Interferometer and fiber Brag grating,9,10 it is clear that the SPR pressure sensor has dramatically improved the sensor sensitivity. However, a recent study concluded that an lossy mode resonance (LMR) sensor has numerous advantages over an SPR sensor. There are many types of metal oxides and polymers that can be used to create an LMR effect on an optical fiber, such as SnO2,11–13 InO2,14 ZnO,15 ZrO2,16 and PAH.17 In addition, LMR fiber optic sensors can be manufactured in a variety of ways. Layer self-assembly and chemical vapor deposition are common coating methods.18 However, most of the proposed pressure sensors based on LMR utilize a plastic-clad silica fiber, which has a large core diameter and large numerical aperture. Therefore, the resonant peak has a wide full width at half maximum, which reduces the accuracy of the sensor.

Compared with traditional fiber structures, microstructure fibers based on photonic crystal fiber (PCF) have many design and manufacturing advantages.19–23 To satisfy the phase matching condition, it is possible to change the geometric structure and adjust the effective refractive index (neff) of the fiber of the core guided mode.24 There are various SPR sensors based on microstructure PCF. However, as yet, no one has proposed a PCF-based LMR pressure sensor.

In this work, we design and simulate an LMR pressure sensor based on exposed-core grapefruit PCF. The TiO2/HfO2 is coated on the exposed-core region to excite LMR. A bimetallic-oxide bilayer can dramatically increase the sensor sensitivity because of the high refractive index of HfO2. In addition, the performance of the sensor is optimized by adjusting the type and thickness of the film.

A schematic diagram of the proposed exposed-core microstructure fiber sensor is shown in Fig. 1. The thickness of the quartz between two adjacent air holes and of the fiber core radius is 7μm and 1μm, respectively. The TiO2/HfO2 bilayer film thickness is 50/30 nm. It is possible to manufacture the fiber using micromachining techniques to make the exposed fiber core. A wet chemistry deposition or chemical vapor deposition technique can be utilized to coat the TiO2/HfO2 film on the exposed-core portion to excite the LMR effect.24 It is clear that coating the film on the exposed-core area is far easier than coating the inner wall of the air hole. Also, the metallic oxide bilayer can dramatically increase the sensitivity of the microstructure fiber pressure sensor. This is because the overlay of HfO2 film has a high dielectric, which can improve the sensor’s sensitivity.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of proposed fiber sensor.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of proposed fiber sensor.

Close modal

We used COMSOL Multiphysics with the finite element method (FEM) to simulate the sensor performance. The entire proposed sensor was divided into numerous triangular regions and a scattering boundary condition was set as perfectly matched layers. The modal simulation was conducted in cartesian coordinates, with light propagating along the Z direction. Figure 2 shows electric field distribution and dispersion relations of the core modes with the sample refractive index (RI) = 1.33. Gaussian-like modes were used as the core modes because these are suitable for describing the excitation by standard Gaussian laser.25 It is clear that the asymmetric LMR region results in strong birefringence and almost all light is coupled in a certain direction. The x-polarized and y-polarized resonance peaks can be utilized to detect RI. However, the y-polarized peak shifting is more rapid than the x-polarized peak when the sample RI is varied the same way. That is to say, y-polarization has a higher coupling efficiency and the sensitivity of the x-polarized peak is higher. Therefore, the shift of y-polarization is used to analyze the sensor’s performance in detecting analytes.

FIG. 2.

Electric field distributions and dispersion relations of core modes when SPR is 1.33. Inset: (a) x -polarized core mode at λ = 808 nm and (b) y-polarized core mode at λ = 827 nm.

FIG. 2.

Electric field distributions and dispersion relations of core modes when SPR is 1.33. Inset: (a) x -polarized core mode at λ = 808 nm and (b) y-polarized core mode at λ = 827 nm.

Close modal

The microstructure optical fiber is made of fused silica. The dispersion characteristic of the fiber is described by the Sellmeier equation26 

n(λ)=1+a1λ2λ2b12+a2λ2λ2b22+a3λ2λ2b32
(1)

where a1 = 0.696166300, a2 = 0.407942600, a3 = 0.897479400, b1 = 4.67914826 × 10−3μm2, b2 = 1.35120631 × 10−2μm−2, and b3 = 97.9340025μm2. The Lorentz model can describe the dispersion characteristic of the permittivity of TiO2, which can be written as27 

ε(E)=ε+kAkEk2E2iBkE
(2)

where ε is the high frequency dielectric constant, Ak is the amplitude, Bk is the center energy, and E is the photon energy. For simplicity in the simulation, the parameters were given values of ε = 1, Ak = 101 eV2, and Ek =6.2 eV.

The dispersion characteristic of the HfO2 dielectric constant can be expressed by the Lorentz oscillator model28 

ε(v)=A2+Bv2+jvpj2vj2v2iγjv
(3)

Here, for simplicity, j = 1, A = 1.956, B = 6.73 × 10−10cm2, vp1 = 247cm−1, v1 = 187cm−1, and γ1=216cm1=1λ. It has been shown in the literature that it is possible for the sensitivity of an LMR sensor to be affected by the permittivity of the material. The permittivity of HfO2 has a real part that is higher, which enhances the proposed sensor’s performance. The confinement loss of the spectra is expressed as

αloss(dB/m)=8.686×k×Im[neff]
(4)

where k = 2π/λ is the wavenumber and Im(neff) is the imaginary part of the effective mode of the microstructure fiber sensor.

The wavelength sensitivity is defined as

Sλ(nm/RIU)=ΔλpeakΔna
(5)

where λpeak is the peak wavelength and Δna is the variation of the analyte RI.

For rubber polymer material, the relationship between pressure and refractive index can be written as28 

Sp=KYp(DpnpDp)T=(1η)(np21)(np2+2)6np1VpYp
(6)

For the polymer, (DpnpDp)T0.5 and Vp ≅ 1.0.

Sensor wavelength sensitivity is defined as the shift of resonance peak with applied pressure, which is written as

Sp=KYp(λresnp)
(7)

where K = 0.5 is constant and Yp = 1.0 MPa for rubber polymer.

To study the performance of the proposed microstructured fiber optic sensor, we simulate various sample RI ranges, from 1.33 to 1.39. These sample RI values represent polymer density variations because the RI of the polymer is a function of polymer density, which is demonstrated in Eq. (6). As shown in Fig. 3, there are a total four LMR peaks in the spectra. The asymmetric LMR region generates strong birefringence, the x-polarized and y-polarized resonance peaks. When the SPI changes because of the variation of the polymer’s pressure, the resonance wavelength has a considerable shift. In previous studies, it was determined that the thickness of the film has a great influence on the sensitivity of the LMR sensor. Thus, the influence of the thickness of the TiO2 film on the sensor’s performance is not studied in this section. We utilized a TiO2/HfO2 bilayer in order to further enhance the sensor’s sensitivity. As shown in Fig. 4, the combination of TiO2 and HfO2 film can affect the LMR reflection spectra. Since the permittivity of HfO2 is higher than that of TiO2, the metallic oxide bilayer can excite stronger LMR. Therefore, if the HfO2 layer is coated on the TiO2 film, the resonant wavelength shift will be large. The simulation result shows that an extremely high RI sensitivity of 67,000 nm/RIU is obtained in the sensing range of 1.33–1.39. Also, we compare the RI sensitivity with the previous LMR sensors reported in Table I. The sensitivity of the LMR is affected by the type and thickness of the film, thus the sensitivity of the D-shaped LMR sensor can reach over 1 000 000 nm/RIU in the high RI range (1.448–1.449) in Ref. 12. It is clear that the proposed sensor has competitive performance in the RI range of 1.33–1.39, in terms of the sensitivity.

FIG. 3.

Loss spectra of (a) x-polarized peaks and (b) y-polarized peaks of the microstructure optical fiber based on a single TiO2 film at SRI from 1.33 to 1.39.

FIG. 3.

Loss spectra of (a) x-polarized peaks and (b) y-polarized peaks of the microstructure optical fiber based on a single TiO2 film at SRI from 1.33 to 1.39.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Loss spectra of (a) x-polarized peaks and (b) y-polarized peaks of the microstructure optical fiber based on TiO2/HfO2 film at SRI from 1.33 to 1.39.

FIG. 4.

Loss spectra of (a) x-polarized peaks and (b) y-polarized peaks of the microstructure optical fiber based on TiO2/HfO2 film at SRI from 1.33 to 1.39.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Sensitivity comparison of the proposed sensor with other LMR sensors.

Fiber
ConfigurationMaterialRI RangeMaximum Sensitivity
D-Shape SnO2 1.321–1.326 14 501 nm/RIU11  
D-Shape SnO2 1.448–1.449 1 087 889 nm/RIU12  
Multimode InO2 1.32–1.39 4000 nm/RIU14  
Multimode ZnO 1.32–1.44 760 nm/RIU15  
Multimode ZrO2 1.41–1.43 880 nm/RIU16  
This paper TiO2/HfO2 1.33–1.39 67 000 nm/RIU 
Fiber
ConfigurationMaterialRI RangeMaximum Sensitivity
D-Shape SnO2 1.321–1.326 14 501 nm/RIU11  
D-Shape SnO2 1.448–1.449 1 087 889 nm/RIU12  
Multimode InO2 1.32–1.39 4000 nm/RIU14  
Multimode ZnO 1.32–1.44 760 nm/RIU15  
Multimode ZrO2 1.41–1.43 880 nm/RIU16  
This paper TiO2/HfO2 1.33–1.39 67 000 nm/RIU 

We explored the influence of the ratio of the thickness of TiO2 to the thickness of HfO2 film on the pressure sensitivity of the sensor. We simulated three different sensor probes based on the different proportion of TiO2/HfO2 film thickness, with the same total thickness d = 80 nm. Simulation results demonstrate that when the proportion of HfO2 increases gradually from zero, the sensitivity of the sensor gradually increases. When the ratio of HfO2 to TiO2 reaches 30/50, the sensitivity of the sensor reaches a maximum. However, as the ratio of HfO2 to TiO2 continues to increase, the sensitivity of the sensor decreases. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that although HfO2 has a higher real part of the dielectric constant, the imaginary part of the dielectric constant is zero. Thus, when only HfO2 is coated on the surface of the fiber, the LMR effect cannot be excited. As the proportion of HfO2 increases, the proportion of TiO2 decreases, leading to a gradual decrease in the sensitivity of the sensor.

Since the first LMR peak in the spectra is considered to be the most sensitive, we only select the first LMR peak to study the sensitivity of the sensor. We compare the sensitivity of the sensor coated with TiO2/HfO2 film with that coated with only TiO2 film in Table II. Four sensors, with a TiO2/HfO2 bilayer of 60/20, 50/30, 40/40 nm, and with a single TiO2 layer of 80 nm, were investigated. All the sensors were described with the various SRI due to the pressure change. The optimal sensor is coated with TiO2/HfO2 of 50/30 nm, and a pressure sensitivity of 5μm/MPa is reached. In contrast, the sensitivity of the sensor coated with a single TiO2 film of 80 nm only achieves 3.8μm/MPa. It is clear that the proposed pressure sensor has a competitive sensitivity.

TABLE II.

Sensitivity comparison for the LMR sensor coated with different films.

AverageMaximum
Film materialThicknesssensitivitySensitivity
TiO2 80 nm 2.7 μm/MPa 3.8 μm/MPa 
TiO2/HfO2 60nm/20 nm 3.1 μm/MPa 4.6 μm/MPa 
 50 nm/30 nm 3.3 μm/MPa 5.0 μm/MPa 
 40 nm/40 nm 3.2 μm/MPa 4.8 μm/MPa 
AverageMaximum
Film materialThicknesssensitivitySensitivity
TiO2 80 nm 2.7 μm/MPa 3.8 μm/MPa 
TiO2/HfO2 60nm/20 nm 3.1 μm/MPa 4.6 μm/MPa 
 50 nm/30 nm 3.3 μm/MPa 5.0 μm/MPa 
 40 nm/40 nm 3.2 μm/MPa 4.8 μm/MPa 

In addition, to evaluate the performance of the proposed sensor in this paper, we compared this with the previously reported optical fiber pressure sensors in Table III. The results show that the proposed sensor has an advantage in sensor sensitivity for detecting pressure.

TABLE III.

Sensitivity comparison of the proposed sensor with other pressure sensors.

Type of sensor MaterialMaximum Sensitivity
Sagnac Interferometer PM-PCF 4.21 nm/MPa22  
FBG Bourdon tube 1.414 pm/kPa10  
SPR Ag film 1.75 μm/MPa8  
LMR ZnO/HfO2 film 2 μm/MPa28  
Proposed sensor TiO2/HfO2 film 5 μm/MPa 
Type of sensor MaterialMaximum Sensitivity
Sagnac Interferometer PM-PCF 4.21 nm/MPa22  
FBG Bourdon tube 1.414 pm/kPa10  
SPR Ag film 1.75 μm/MPa8  
LMR ZnO/HfO2 film 2 μm/MPa28  
Proposed sensor TiO2/HfO2 film 5 μm/MPa 

In this paper, we theoretically analyzed and optimized a microstructure optical fiber sensor based on lossy mode resonance. The fiber structure of an exposed-core PCF has been successfully fabricated in SPR sensors.29 Therefore, we believe that this structure can also be used in LMR sensors in an experiment. In terms of the sensitivity of the sensor, the LMR-based sensor has better performance than an SPR-based sensor. Future research will focus on the transition of LMR-based sensors from the laboratory to actual production applications, in the same way that SPR-based sensors have been widely applied.

We described a highly sensitive pressure sensor based on lossy mode resonance with an exposed-core microstructure fiber. The microstructure fiber sensor is manufactured with an exposed-core photonics crystal fiber, on which TiO2/HfO2 film is coated. Strong birefringence, with x-polarized and y-polarized peaks, is generated because of the asymmetric sensing region. We also investigated the influence of the ratio of the thickness of TiO2 to the thickness of HfO2 on the sensitivity of the pressure sensor. From the simulation results, we conclude that the proposed sensor has excellent pressure sensitivity.

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant N180402023, N182410001, N172002001, and National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program under grant 201810145075, and National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 51607028. The author thanks Dr. Wan-Ming Zhao and M.Eng. Bo-Tao Wang for valuable comments on this paper.

1.
D. P.
Duarte
,
N.
Alberto
,
L.
Bilro
, and
R.
Nogueira
, “
Theoretical design of a high sensitivity SPR-based optical fiber pressure sensor
,”
Journal of Lightwave Technology
33
(
22
),
4606
4611
(
2015
).
2.
Q.
Wang
and
W.-M.
Zhao
, “
Optical methods of antibiotic residues detections: A comprehensive review
,”
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
269
,
238
256
(
2018
).
3.
G.
An
,
S.
Li
,
T.
Cheng
,
X.
Yan
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Zhou
, and
Z.
Yuan
, “
Ultra-stable D-shaped optical fiber refractive index sensor with graphene-gold deposited platform
,”
Plasmonics
14
(
1
),
155
163
(
2018
).
4.
J.-Y.
Jing
,
Q.
Wang
,
W.-M.
Zhao
, and
B.-T.
Wang
, “
Long-range surface plasmon resonance and its sensing applications: A review
,”
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
112
,
103
118
(
2019
).
5.
Y. N.
Zhang
,
T.
Zhou
,
B.
Han
,
A.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Zhao
, “
Optical bio-chemical sensors based on whispering gallery mode resonators
,”
Nanoscale
10
(
29
),
13832
13856
(
2018
).
6.
Y.
Zhao
,
R. J.
Tong
,
F.
Xia
, and
Y.
Peng
, “
Current status of optical fiber biosensor based on surface plasmon resonance
,”
Biosens Bioelectron
142
,
111505
(
2019
).
7.
Q.
Wang
,
J.-Y.
Jing
,
X.-Z.
Wang
,
L.-Y.
Niu
, and
W.-M.
Zhao
, “
A D-shaped fiber long-range surface plasmon resonance sensor with high Q-factor and temperature self-compensation
,”
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
,
1
(
2019
).
8.
H.
Mi
,
Y.
Wang
,
P.
Jin
, and
L.
Lei
, “
Design of a ultrahigh-sensitivity SPR-based optical fiber pressure sensor
,”
Optik
124
(
21
),
5248
5250
(
2013
).
9.
X. Z.
Wang
and
Q.
Wang
, “
A high-birefringence microfiber Sagnac-interferometer biosensor based on the vernier effect
,”
Sensors (Basel)
18
(
12
),
4114
(
2018
).
10.
J.
Huang
,
Z.
Zhou
,
D.
Zhang
, and
Q.
Wei
, “
A fiber Bragg grating pressure sensor and its application to pipeline leakage detection
,”
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
5
,
590451
(
2015
).
11.
F. J.
Arregui
,
I.
Del Villar
,
C. R.
Zamarreño
,
P.
Zubiate
, and
I. R.
Matias
, “
Giant sensitivity of optical fiber sensors by means of lossy mode resonance
,”
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
232
,
660
665
(
2016
).
12.
A.
Ozcariz
,
C. R.
Zamarreno
,
P.
Zubiate
, and
F. J.
Arregui
, “
Is there a frontier in sensitivity with lossy mode resonance (LMR) based refractometers?
,”
Sci Rep
7
(
1
),
10280
(
2017
).
13.
Q.
Wang
,
X.
Li
,
W.-M.
Zhao
, and
S.
Jin
, “
Lossy mode resonance-based fiber optic sensor using layer-by-layer SnO2 thin film and SnO2 nanoparticles
,”
Applied Surface Science
492
,
374
381
(
2019
).
14.
I. D.
Villar
,
C. R.
Zamarreño
,
P.
Sanchez
,
M.
Hernaez
,
C. F.
Valdivielso
,
F. J.
Arregui
, and
I. R.
Matias
, “
Generation of lossy mode resonances by deposition of high-refractive-index coatings on uncladded multimode optical fibers
,”
Journal of Optics
12
(
9
),
095503
(
2010
).
15.
S. P.
Usha
and
B. D.
Gupta
, “
Performance analysis of zinc oxide-implemented lossy mode resonance-based optical fiber refractive index sensor utilizing thin film/nanostructure
,”
Appl Opt
56
(
20
),
5716
5725
(
2017
).
16.
K.
Kosiel
,
M.
Koba
,
M.
Masiewicz
, and
M.
Śmietana
, “
Tailoring properties of lossy-mode resonance optical fiber sensors with atomic layer deposition technique
,”
Optics & Laser Technology
102
,
213
221
(
2018
).
17.
A. B.
Socorro
,
J. M.
Corres
,
I.
Del Villar
,
F. J.
Arregui
, and
I. R.
Matias
, “
Fiber-optic biosensor based on lossy mode resonances
,”
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
174
,
263
269
(
2012
).
18.
Q.
Wang
and
W.-M.
Zhao
, “
A comprehensive review of lossy mode resonance-based fiber optic sensors
,”
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
100
,
47
60
(
2018
).
19.
N.
Luan
,
H.
Han
,
L.
Zhao
,
J.
Liu
, and
J.
Yao
, “
Opening up dual-core microstructured optical fiber-based plasmonic sensor with large detection range and linear sensitivity
,”
Optical Materials Express
9
(
2
),
819
(
2019
).
20.
X.
Yang
,
Y.
Lu
,
M.
Wang
, and
J.
Yao
, “
An exposed-core grapefruit fibers based surface plasmon resonance sensor
,”
Sensors (Basel)
15
(
7
),
17106
17114
(
2015
).
21.
Y. N.
Zhang
,
Y.
Zhao
,
T.
Zhou
, and
Q.
Wu
, “
Applications and developments of on-chip biochemical sensors based on optofluidic photonic crystal cavities
,”
Lab Chip
18
(
1
),
57
74
(
2017
).
22.
H. Y.
Fu
,
C.
Wu
,
M. L. V.
Tse
,
L.
Zhang
,
K. C. D.
Cheng
,
H. Y.
Tam
,
B. O.
Guan
, and
C.
Lu
, “
High pressure sensor based on photonic crystal fiber for downhole application
,”
Applied Optics
49
(
14
),
2639
2643
(
2010
).
23.
X.
Yang
,
W. X.
Shu
,
Y. Q.
Wang
,
Y.
Gong
,
C. Y.
Gong
,
Q. S.
Chen
,
X. T.
Tan
,
G. D.
Peng
,
X. D.
Fan
, and
Y. J.
Rao
, “
Turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay revisited to enhance its sensitivity via an optofluidic laser
,”
Biosensors & Bioelectronics
131
,
60
66
(
2019
).
24.
X. C.
Yang
,
Y.
Lu
,
M. T.
Wang
, and
J. Q.
Yao
, “
SPR sensor based on exposed-core grapefruit fiber with bimetallic structure
,”
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters
28
(
6
),
649
652
(
2016
).
25.
X.
Yang
,
Y.
Lu
,
B.
Liu
, and
J.
Yao
, “
Simulation of LSPR sensor based on exposed-core grapefruit fiber with a silver nanoshell
,”
Journal of Lightwave Technology
35
(
21
),
4728
4733
(
2017
).
26.
X.-Z.
Wang
and
Q.
Wang
, “
Theoretical analysis of a novel microstructure fiber sensor based on lossy mode resonance
,”
Electronics
8
(
5
),
484
(
2019
).
27.
N.
Paliwal
and
J.
John
, “
Lossy mode resonance (LMR) based fiber optic sensors: A review
,”
IEEE Sensors Journal
15
(
10
),
5361
5371
(
2015
).
28.
N.
Paliwal
and
J.
John
, “
Design and modeling of highly sensitive lossy mode resonance-based fiber-optic pressure sensor
,”
IEEE Sensors Journal
18
(
1
),
209
215
(
2018
).
29.
E.
Klantsataya
,
A.
Francois
,
H.
Ebendorff-Heidepriem
,
P.
Hoffmann
, and
T. M.
Monro
, “
Surface plasmon scattering in exposed core optical fiber for enhanced resolution refractive index sensing
,”
Sensors (Basel)
15
(
10
),
25090
25102
(
2015
).