Organic-inorganic hybrid halide perovskites are emerging as one of the potential materials in the photovoltaic community due to its attractive power conversion efficiency and cost-effective device fabrication. The photovoltaic performance of hybrid halide perovskite is linked to its atomic and electronic structure at the surface. Here we have used electronic structure calculations to determine the structural and electronic properties at the surface of MABX3 (MA = CH3NH3; B = Sn or Pb; X= I, Br, or Cl) perovskites. Next, we compared calculated electronic properties of the surface with the corresponding bulk values. Our results reveal that the structural properties like B-X distances, B-X-B angles, and orientation of MA are different between bulk to perovskite surface. Such changes in structural features at the perovskite surface lead to change in the band gap between surface and bulk perovskite. Both structural features and the band gap at the surface are found to be dependent on the crystal symmetry and chemistry of the perovskite. Further, for all perovskite compositions investigated, no midgap surface electronic states were observed.

Organic-inorganic hybrid halide MABX3 perovskites (MA/methylammonium = CH3NH3; B = Sn or Pb; X = I, Br, or Cl) have recently emerged as one of the most promising materials for photovoltaic technology.1,2 The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of these halide perovskite has risen from 3.8% to 24.2%,2–6 since the first use of halide perovskite as a light absorber in solar cells.7 Beside the PCE, MABX3 family of perovskites also exhibit remarkable photovoltaic features compared to conventional solar absorbers like CdTe, and amorphous Si. The unique features of halide perovskite includes its band gap (≈2 eV), greater optical absorption spectra (up to a wavelength of ∼800 nm) compared to the conventional thin-film solar cell absorber (about ∼600 nm wavelength),1,8–10 high carrier mobility and long (>1μm) electron-hole diffusion length.11 Further, in the hybrid halide perovskite, most of the defects are formed in the valence band or the conduction band making them less likely to form deep trap defects within the band gap.12 

In a typical perovskite-based solar cell, photo-active perovskite layer is interfaced with an electron transport layer (ETL) comprising of materials13–16 such as C60, PCBM, TiO2 and hole transport layer (HTL). The atomic structure and electronic property of the perovskite/ETL (or HTL) interface arise from the individual atomic structure of perovskite and ETL (or HTL) surface layers as well as by the unique structures produced when the ETL (or HTL) is formed on the perovskite surface. Consequently, it is the surface and interface which play a key role in the performance of perovskite solar cells. For example, different electronic trap states are known to form on perovskite surface with point defect depending on surface terminations.12 Thus, facets within perovskite solar cells may have a direct consequence on the power conversion efficiency,17 due to the facet-dependent density of trap states.

Numerous theoretical studies up-to-date have been devoted to the study of the properties of bulk perovskite materials. However, our understanding of the surface and interface structure and properties of perovskite/ETL systems are still at the nascent stage. The surface structure for limited number of perovskite systems such as lead iodide and bromide has been explored so far.13,18–24 The structure and properties of some of the common halide perovskite such as lead-chloride, tin-bromide, and tin-chloride are still unclear. It is notable that in bulk form lead- and tin-based halide perovskite was found to exhibit significantly distinct electronic properties.9,25,26 For instance, MASnI3 exhibit smaller band gap than that of MAPbI3 (1.2 vs. 1.6 eV, respectively).27 Likewise, the choice of halides in MAPbX3 can modify the band gap of the perovskite. In that case, it is expected the surface structure, and electronic properties of individual halide perovskite surface will be unique.

In this paper, we aim to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the surface structure and electronic properties of MABX3 for different B site and halide composition. In particular, we will present electronic structure calculations of the surface atomic structure and electronic properties of tetragonal MABX3, with B=Pb or Sn, and X=I, Br, or Cl. It should be pointed out that both theory and experiment have confirmed that (110) and (001) charge neutral surfaces are stabilized in the tetragonal phase of the perovskite.18,28 In this study, we restrict our computations to more commonly observed (001) surface. The orientation of polar ion (CH3NH3+), the metal-halide interatomic distance, B-X-B angle as well as band gap are compared between the surface with their corresponding bulk structures, to gain a thorough understanding of the change in properties from bulk to surface. Further, we have highlighted the importance of the crystal symmetry and size of the halide atom and its bond distance with B atom as factors responsible for reduction of band gap at the surface compared to the bulk counterpart. Understanding of the surface structures will form the preliminary basis to comprehend the more complex interfacial atomic structure and properties.

We performed density functional theory (DFT)29,30 calculations using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP).31,32 The electron-ion interaction is described by the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method.33,34 The exchange-correlation interaction between electrons is treated by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional.35 To describe the interaction between MA+ ions and the inorganic matrix, the van der Waals (vdW) correction,36 vdW-DF, as implemented in VASP, is employed. The cutoff energy of 500 eV is used for the plane-wave basis set in all calculations. We have taken only the scalar-relativistic effect in our calculations, as discussed in details later in the manuscript.

Experimental lattice parameters are chosen as starting lattice parameters,26,37 when it is available. For each bulk structure, lattice parameter and position of atoms are optimized until the force on each atom is below 0.02 eV/Å. For surface calculations, the slab models are constructed from the corresponding optimized bulk perovskite structures. For all six compositions, neutral (001) surfaces with two possible surface termination of slabs, i.e., MAX- and BX2- surface terminations are considered. Our BX2- and MAI-terminated (001) slab models have nine and eleven alternating MAX and BX2 layers, respectively, while a 2×2 in-plane periodicity is maintained perpendicular for each surface structure.13,38 We maintained the same supercell volume for both MAX and BX2 terminations for a given composition. Resulting vacuum thickness used was about 25 Å and 35 Å for MAX and BX2 terminations, respectively to avoid any interaction between the slab and its periodic image. Finally, all slabs models are relaxed for their atomic position with (4 × 4 × 1) Monkhorst-Pack k-point grids with the same force convergence criteria as the bulk.

For direct comparison of the surfaces across the different compositions, we limit our study on the surfaces to those of tetragonal perovskite structures. Within the tetragonal phase, we performed calculations on P4/mmm space group for all compositions, except MAPbI3. For MAPbI3 we used structures in I4/mcm space group. Experimentally both MAPbI3 and MAPbBr3 has been observed in I4/mcm, at different temperature ranges.26,37 Hence, the additional structure of MAPbBr3 in I4/mcm was also included in the calculation. In case of MASnBr3 and MASnCl3, there are no experimentally reported tetragonal structures39–41 to best of our knowledge. Hence, we modeled tetragonal MASnBr3 and MASnCl3 structures by replacing I of MASnI3P4/mmm structure with Br and Cl atoms respectively and optimizing the structure with the DFT.42 Typical examples of tetragonal bulk structures in space group I4/mcm and P4/mmm are shown in Fig. 1 (a) and (b), respectively.

FIG. 1.

Crystal structure of bulk perovskites, (a) MAPbI3 as an example of I4/mcm structures and (b) MAPbBr3 as an example of P4/mmm structures.

FIG. 1.

Crystal structure of bulk perovskites, (a) MAPbI3 as an example of I4/mcm structures and (b) MAPbBr3 as an example of P4/mmm structures.

Close modal

To understand bulk vs. surface properties, first we have analyzed the atomic structure of both MAX and BX2 terminated surfaces of different crystal symmetry and composition, and compared them with their corresponding bulk structures, Fig 1. Fig. 2 shows the optimized slab models of the MAX surface termination. In all MAX surface terminations, ions CH3NH3+ that lies on the surface have more free volume available compared to the bulk and has relatively more freedom in adjusting its orientation at the surface. For reference, the atomic structure of the bulk can be visualized from the inner layers of the surface structures. However, the bulk values presented in the manuscript are from the true bulk structures as presented in Fig. 1. It can be seen from Fig. 2 (a) and (b) surfaces of the perovskites, MAPbI3 and MAPbBr3, belonging to the same space group I4/mcm, shows different orientation of CH3NH3+ after optimization. In case of the MAPbI3, CH3NH3+ of the outermost layers rotates so that CH3 is pointing towards the surface in both the top and bottom surfaces in Fig. 2 (a). While the orientation of CH3NH3+ in MAPbBr3 remains unchanged compared to bulk after the optimization, i.e., CH3 and NH3 are pointing towards the surface at opposite ends, Fig. 2 (b). For other perovskite compositions, that belong to the space group P4/mmm, in all MAX surface terminations, CH3NH3+ cations aligned with the CH3 pointing towards the surface (at both ends), except for the case of MASnBr3 and MASnCl3 perovskites, Figures 2 (f) and (g), respectively. In both perovskites MASnBr3 and MASnCl3CH3NH3+ show similar orientation as in I4/mcm - MAPbBr3, where CH3 and NH3 are pointing towards the surface at opposite ends.

FIG. 2.

The atomic structure of DFT optimized MAX surface terminations of MABX3 compositions (a) MAPbI3(I4/mcm); (b) MAPbBr3(I4/mcm); (c) MAPbBr3(P4/mmm); (d) MAPbCl3(P4/mmm); (e) MASnI3(P4/mmm); (f) MASnBr3(P4/mmm); (g) MASnCl3(P4/mmm). Atoms that lies inside rectangles in (a) are treated as a surface atoms on each structures. (h) Typical CH3NH3+ ion with oval marking CH3 and NH3.

FIG. 2.

The atomic structure of DFT optimized MAX surface terminations of MABX3 compositions (a) MAPbI3(I4/mcm); (b) MAPbBr3(I4/mcm); (c) MAPbBr3(P4/mmm); (d) MAPbCl3(P4/mmm); (e) MASnI3(P4/mmm); (f) MASnBr3(P4/mmm); (g) MASnCl3(P4/mmm). Atoms that lies inside rectangles in (a) are treated as a surface atoms on each structures. (h) Typical CH3NH3+ ion with oval marking CH3 and NH3.

Close modal

Fig. 3 shows the optimized slab models of BX2 terminations. In BX2 surface terminations, CH3NH3+ is shielded from the outer surface by BX2 atomic layer. The surface of the perovskite MAPbI3 and MAPbBr3 belonging to space group I4/mcm does not show significant reorientation of CH3NH3+ compared to the bulk structure after optimization, Figures 3 (a) and (b), respectively. It is notable that P4/mmm structures have a more symmetric arrangement of atoms as angle joining two polyhedra (the B-X-B angle) shown in Fig. 1 are closer to linear angle i.e., 180° in comparison to I4/mcm, where it deviates more from 180°. Details of the B-X-B angles in each structure are given later in the manuscript (see Table I). With the increased symmetry in the space group P4/mmm, CH3NH3+ reorientates compared to the bulk during optimization for the BX2 surface termination of MAPbBr3, MAPbCl3 and MASnI3, Fig. 3(c)–(e). For these structures, during optimization CH3NH3+ rotated in such a way that NH3 points towards the surface (angles that C-N bonds make at two ends of the slab are different for MAPbBr3 and MAPbCl3). Further, for the BX2 surface terminations of both MASnBr3 and MASnCl3, CH3NH3+ does not show significant reorientation during optimization similar to the MAX surface terminations of these perovskites.

FIG. 3.

The atomic structure of DFT optimized BX2 surface terminations of MABX3 compositions (a) MAPbI3(I4/mcm); (b) MAPbBr3(I4/mcm); (c) MAPbBr3(P4/mmm); (d) MAPbCl3(P4/mmm); (e) MASnI3(P4/mmm); (f) MASnBr3(P4/mmm); (g) MASnCl3(P4/mmm). Atoms that lies inside rectangles in (a) are treated as a surface atoms on each structures.

FIG. 3.

The atomic structure of DFT optimized BX2 surface terminations of MABX3 compositions (a) MAPbI3(I4/mcm); (b) MAPbBr3(I4/mcm); (c) MAPbBr3(P4/mmm); (d) MAPbCl3(P4/mmm); (e) MASnI3(P4/mmm); (f) MASnBr3(P4/mmm); (g) MASnCl3(P4/mmm). Atoms that lies inside rectangles in (a) are treated as a surface atoms on each structures.

Close modal
TABLE I.

The calculated equatorial bond angles (B-X-B) for bulk and perovskite surfaces.

Space group Perovskite Bulk MAX BX2
I4/mcm  MAPbI3  140°-155°  140°-152°  140°-155° 
  MAPbBr3  149°-157°  145°-158°  146°-156° 
P4/mmm  MAPbBr3  168°-169°  160°-172°  161°-174° 
  MAPbCl3  168°-175°  161°-172°  162°-174° 
  MASnI3  172°-176°  166°-173°  166°-178° 
  MASbBr3  168°-169°  166°-175°  162°-174° 
  MASnCl3  168°-170°  164°-178°  160°-167° 
Space group Perovskite Bulk MAX BX2
I4/mcm  MAPbI3  140°-155°  140°-152°  140°-155° 
  MAPbBr3  149°-157°  145°-158°  146°-156° 
P4/mmm  MAPbBr3  168°-169°  160°-172°  161°-174° 
  MAPbCl3  168°-175°  161°-172°  162°-174° 
  MASnI3  172°-176°  166°-173°  166°-178° 
  MASbBr3  168°-169°  166°-175°  162°-174° 
  MASnCl3  168°-170°  164°-178°  160°-167° 

In the hybrid organic-inorganic halide perovskite methylammonium (CH3NH3+) ions are located in the octahedron volume formed by B-X bonds, i.e., BX6 (see Fig. 1). In general, the reduced symmetry in the space group I4/mcm (based on B-X-B angles, Table I) leads to decrease in octahedron volume formed by BX6 compared to structures in the space group P4/mmm. However, for perovskite structures in P4/mmm the smaller interatomic distances of Sn-Br (2.86 Å) and Sn-Cl (2.82 Å) in MASnBr3 and MASnCl3, respectively compared to other perovskite structures (e.g., MASnI3) with B-X interatomic distance > 3 Å will also result in a decrease in octahedron volume formed by BX6. Eventually, the decreased volume will be the limiting factor for free rotation of the CH3NH3+. Symmetric arrangement of polyhedra and the larger B-X distance will allow CH3NH3+ to reorient in slab structures. Clearly, both surface terminations (MAI and SnI2) of MASnI3 perovskite shows the most symmetric orientation of CH3NH3+ at both ends of the slab, Fig. 2 (e) and 3 (e). MASnI3 belongs to the space group P4/mmm, and Sn-I distance is the largest inter-atomic distance compared to other metal-halide distances within the same space group, Fig. 4. For comparison, in the optimized bulk perovskite the values of B-X distances are 3.05 Å for Sn-I; 2.95 Å for Pb-Br; 2.84 Å for Pb-Cl; 2.86 Å for Sn-Br; and 2.82 Å for Sn-Cl. Reorientation of the MA cation in the perovskite structure (MAPbI3) was reported previously,43 and the rotation/relaxation of MA cation contributes to the dielectric constants.44 The static permittivity, ϵstat, in bulk MAPbX3 was found to have a magnitude of 62 for the iodide, 58 for the bromide, and 45 for the chloride below 1 GHz at room temperature,44 i.e., higher the reorientation of MA lesser the permittivity. Also, it was confirmed that reorientation of the CH3NH3+ cation could be captured only when van der Waals interaction for the description of the MA cation is properly included in the calculations13 as it was done in the present work. The asymmetric orientation of the polar CH3NH3+ ion in different layers may lead to accumulation of bound charges giving rise to surface states in the electronic structure, which will be discussed in the section Electronic Structure.

FIG. 4.

Average B-X distances in bulk, MAX, and BX2 surface terminations of perovskites.

FIG. 4.

Average B-X distances in bulk, MAX, and BX2 surface terminations of perovskites.

Close modal

Contribution at the band edges and hence the transport attributes in hybrid halide perovskites arises mainly from the bonding between metal B and the halide X.27 To investigate the changes in metal halide bonding characteristics from bulk to the surface, we have analyzed the metal halide, B-X, distances, and B-X-B angles. The average B-X distances in optimized bulk and the two (BX2 and MAX) surface terminations for different perovskite composition is depicted in Fig. 4. The atoms on each side of the slab, which lie in the outermost BX2 layer, and MAX layers next to the BX2 above and below if any, were considered as the surface atoms. In other words, for the BX2 surface termination, the surface atom will be atoms on the outermost BX2 layer and one MAX layer below it, i.e., atoms inside rectangles in Fig. 2 (a). Similarly, the MAX surface termination will have atoms on the BX2 layer together with one MAX layer above and below it, atoms inside rectangles in Fig. 3 (b). In Pb-based perovskites, generally, the average Pb-X distances for the surface atoms remain close to the bulk values. The maximum deviation from the bulk value is less than 2.5% for both MAX and PbX2 surface terminations, Fig. 4. Further, there is no significant difference in the variation of the distances of the atoms on the surface from the bulk interatomic distances for the two space groups I4/mcm and P4/mmm. While for the Sn-based perovskite, deviation in the Sn-X distance from the bulk increases with the decrease (increase) in size (electronegativity) of the halide, size of the halide follows I > Br > Cl. The electronegativity has the opposite trend to size, i.e., I < Br < Cl. The deviation of the surface Sn-X distance from the bulk is 2.62% for Sn-I, 3.15% for Sn-Br and 6.77% for Sn-Cl in the MAX surface termination, SnX2 surface terminations follows the similar trend with slightly less deviation from the bulk compared to MAX surface terminations, Fig. 4. However, in Pb-based perovskite surface, Pb-X distances deviate less (<2.5%) from the bulk. There is no specific trend observed across the different halides in Pb-based perovskite. In Pauling scale electronegativity of Pb and Sn are 2.33 and 1.96, respectively. Because of the larger electronegativity of Pb, compared Sn, Pb-X bonds would have higher covalent nature than Sn-X bond. The less deviation of surface Pb-X distance could be due to the more covalent nature of Pb-X bond making all in-plane Pb-X distances more or less equal.

Further, deviation in the bond distances in surface structures from the bulk may lead to change in bond angles resulting in the polyhedra distortion.45 Hence, we have calculated the bond angles (B-X-B) between the surface atoms and the ranges of angles are listed on the Table I. In general, from the Table I it can be seen that for the structures in the space groups I4/mcm have relatively more significant octahedral distortion than that of the structures in the space group P4/mmm, due to the deviation of the angle from 180°. Whereas from the comparison of surface and the bulk B-X-B angles, it is seen that structure in the space group I4/mcm shows the least deviation in angle from their bulk values, which is less than 2%. For the structure that belongs to P4/mmm, the deviation in B-X-B angle from the bulk is ≈ 3 to ≈ 5% with no specific trend across the composition, Table I. The less distortion on I4/mcm could be due to already distorted polyhedra (deviated from 180°) in bulk compared to P4/mmm structures. Both deviation in the distance and the angle from their bulk values should be due to the reconstruction of the surface, which leads to distortion in the polyhedra. Effects of the atomic reconstruction on the electronic structure will be discussed in the next section.

The band gap is one of the essential material properties for photovoltaic applications. Hence, we have calculated the band gap of the various perovskite surfaces and compared them with the bulk values. It is notable that although, the combination of spin orbit coupling (SOC) and quasi-particle approximations (GW) can reproduce the experimental band gap, but SOC or the advanced DFT methods like quasi-particle approximations (GW) alone fails to reproduce experimental band gap (See supplementary material).9,23,27,46 Combined SOC+GW approach is highly computationally expensive in the present case, because of the size of the models studied. On the contrary, the scalar-relativistic DFT calculation at GGA level (presented in this work), predicts the band gap of Pb-based perovskite correctly due to the fortuitous cancellation of errors between the relativistic spin-orbit coupling and the GGA.46,47 In the case of Sn-based perovskites, effects due to spin-orbit interaction are relatively less. The band gaps of Sn-based perovskites are underestimated due to deficiency of the GGA method (See supplementary material).9,48,49 In any case, we expect the role of different approaches on the relative change in band gap for different surface terminations compared to bulk perovskites will be relatively nominal. Further, it is worth mentioning that previous reports already established that the use of SOC+GW or SOC has a negligible effect on the structural features such as lattice parameters, metal-halide distances, and angles. However, the same reports found that the van der Waals (vdW) corrections play a critical role in the atomic structure of the MA+ ions.13,46,50 Overall, the use of simple DFT with vdW corrections without the inclusion of SOC as it is done in our calculations was found to produce reasonable electronic structures and the structural features.51–54 

Fig. 5 shows the band gap for the bulk perovskites and their two different surface terminations. The band gap of the surfaces that belongs to the space group I4/mcm is reduced from the bulk value for both MAX and BX2 terminations. Moreover, BX2 surface termination shows a smaller band gap compared to MAX surface terminations for all the compositions with B=Pb. For the perovskite of the space group P4/mmm, different perovskite compositions have different band gap characteristics compared to their bulk values. For MAPbCl3, the band gap for both surface terminations remains close to bulk value, with a slight fluctuation of ≈ 0.03 eV, whereas the MABr (PbBr2) surface termination shows increase (similar) band gap values with their bulk MAPbBr3 values, Fig. 5. In Sn-based perovskite, the band gap increases from their bulk values for both surface terminations, except for MASnCl3. The reduced band gap in MASnCl3 surfaces from its bulk value is an exception to all other perovskite compositions in the space group P4/mmm. Further, in contrast to Pb-based perovskite, where band gap remains equal or smaller for the PbX2 surface terminations than that of the MAX surface terminations, in the Sn-based perovskite, SnX2 surface termination always shows a higher band gap compared to MAX surface terminations.

FIG. 5.

Band gap for different surface terminations in Sn and Pb based perovskites. Horizontal line represents band gap in their bulk form, height of the vertical bar represents the magnitude of the gap. Color code for halides: violet for iodine; magenta for bromine; and green for chlorine, respectively.

FIG. 5.

Band gap for different surface terminations in Sn and Pb based perovskites. Horizontal line represents band gap in their bulk form, height of the vertical bar represents the magnitude of the gap. Color code for halides: violet for iodine; magenta for bromine; and green for chlorine, respectively.

Close modal

The reduction in band gap compared to bulk values in the space group I4/mcm can be understood from layer resolved density of state, Fig. 6(a), and the charge density plotted at the band edges, namely conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM) of MAPbI3Fig. 6 (c) and (d), respectively. For MAPbI3 and MAPbBr3 the CBM is located at the BX2 layer on which NH3 are facing, while valence VBM is located at the BX2 layer on which CH3 is pointing. The asymmetric position of the metal cation and orientation of the dipole CH3NH3+ from the adjacent layers results in the accumulation of excess positive and negative charge on the surface layers. The excess charge can shift the CBM down and the VBM up in energy depending upon the magnitude of charge, which will reduce the band gap. For the structure in space group P4/mmm, MAX surface terminations of MAPbBr3, MAPbCl3 and MASnI3, Fig. 2 (c)–(e) and SnI2 surface terminations in Fig. 3 (e) have a more or less symmetric orientation of the dipole CH3NH3+ on both sides of the slab, for all of these slabs CBM and VBM located at the same energy level for the top and bottom end of the slabs as shown in Fig. 6 (b). While for MAX surface terminations of MASnBr3 and MASnCl3 (Fig. 2 (f) and (g)) and all BX2 surface terminations, except SnI2 (Fig. 3 (b), (c), (f) and (g)), their top and bottom layers have an asymmetric location of VBM and CBM, Fig. 6 (b).

FIG. 6.

(a) and (b) density of states plotted for surface Pb and I atoms on either side of each slabs. Charge density plot for slice of energy (c) at the CBM and (d) at the VBM of MAI and PbI2 surface termination, respectively.

FIG. 6.

(a) and (b) density of states plotted for surface Pb and I atoms on either side of each slabs. Charge density plot for slice of energy (c) at the CBM and (d) at the VBM of MAI and PbI2 surface termination, respectively.

Close modal

Further, change in the octahedral geometry at the surface compared to bulk can also be responsible for the change in the band gap between surface and bulk. In hybrid halide perovskite, VBM consists of the antibonding combinations of metal B s and halide X p orbitals, whereas CBM consists of mainly metal p orbitals.39,55 It was found that octahedral distortion can reduce the overlap between metal s and halide p orbitals leading to wider band gap.56,57 Hence, an increase in the band gap of the P4/mmm structures should be due to polyhedral distortion resulting from surface terminations. MASnCl3 is an exception to the structures in the space group P4/mmm in which band gap decreases compared to the surface. A possible reason for the decreased band gap in MASnCl3 could be the drastic change in the bond distance in the slab model, where an average Sn-Cl distance is increasing by more than 6% compared to bulk. The strong equatorial Sn-Cl bonds lead to the weakening of another equatorial Sn-Cl bond causing one out of four equatorial distances greater than 3.24Å compared to rest of the equatorial distances ≈ 2.6Å i.e., Cl-Sn⋯ Cl interaction. Formation of the nonuniform Sn-Cl bond during the phase transition was also discussed in previous studies.41,51 At a considerable distance, overlap of Sn s and Cl p orbitals may vanish completely causing unsaturated bond, leading to a reduction in the band gap.

In summary, the band gap at the perovskite surface results from competition between two phenomena. First, accumulated bound charge due to the orientation of the CH3NH3+ or unsaturated bonding leading to the downshift of the CBM and up shift of VBM in energy resulting in a reduced band gap (MAPbI3, MAPbBr3, MASnCl3). Second, octahedral distortion, which lessens overlap of halide p orbitals and metal s orbitals leading to a larger band gap (MASnI3, MASnBr3). Moreover, in all surface terminations studied surface states appear in the band edges, and no midgap states are being formed in the perovskite surfaces. It should be pointed out that our results on the atomic structure for free surfaces of perovskite (interfacing with vacuum) can provide an initial understanding of the more complex atomic structures of perovskite surfaces during solution-based deposition of perovskite. The structural complexity of perovskite surface for such solution based-processes can be understood as a combined effect of surface structure with a vacuum (presented in this work) and the complex interactions between the solvent molecules and the perovskite surface. We plan to address such the complex, dynamic mutual interactions between solvent molecules, ETL/HTL molecules, and perovskite surface using adaptive biasing force (ABF) approach in our future publication.58 

DFT calculations were performed to investigate (001) surfaces of the tetragonal Pb- and Sn-based hybrid-halide perovskite structures. Reconstruction of the atoms in the surface structures leads to the reorientation of CH3NH3+ ion. The degree of reorientation of the CH3NH3+ ion depends on the availability of the volume created by BX6 octahedral. The octahedral volume depends on the crystal symmetry and the size of the halide atom. Further, in comparison to Pb-based perovskite Sn-based perovskite surface shows significant variations in the metal halide distances compared to their bulk values. In the space group, P4/mmm departure in the octahedral angle from the bulk is higher, compared to the I4/mcm structures. Reorientations of the MA may cause an accumulation of charges resulting in the narrowing of the band gap, whereas the octahedral distortion arising from the deviation in angle (B-X-B) and the distance (B-X) leads to the opening of the band gap. Importantly, the hybrid halide perovskite considered in this study were found to produce no mid-gap surface states, which reduces the chance of trap state formation in perovskite surfaces. Our finding suggests that any of these perovskite composition could be used to create the interface free from mid-gap states to achieve optimal performance in the photovoltaic applications.

See supplementary material for the comparison of band gap of halide perovskites from different DFT approach.

This research made use of the resources at the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517. Publication of this article was funded by the University of Idaho Open Access Publishing Fund.

1.
H. J.
Snaith
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
4
,
3623
(
2013
).
2.
P.
Gao
,
M.
Grätzel
, and
M. K.
Nazeeruddin
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
7
,
2448
(
2014
).
3.
H.
Zhou
,
Q.
Chen
,
G.
Li
,
S.
Luo
,
T.-b.
Song
,
H.-S.
Duan
,
Z.
Hong
,
J.
You
,
Y.
Liu
, and
Y.
Yang
,
Science
345
,
542
(
2014
).
4.
T. J.
Jacobsson
,
J.-P.
Correa-Baena
,
M.
Pazoki
,
M.
Saliba
,
K.
Schenk
,
M.
Grätzel
, and
A.
Hagfeldt
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
9
,
1706
(
2016
).
5.
S.
Yang
,
W.
Fu
,
Z.
Zhang
,
H.
Chen
, and
C.-Z.
Li
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
5
,
11462
(
2017
).
6.
Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart | Photovoltaic Research | NREL
,” https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html, accessed:
2019-07-18
.
7.
A.
Kojima
,
K.
Teshima
,
Y.
Shirai
, and
T.
Miyasaka
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
131
,
6050
(
2009
).
8.
C. S.
Ponseca
,
T. J.
Savenije
,
M.
Abdellah
,
K.
Zheng
,
A.
Yartsev
,
T.
Pascher
,
T.
Harlang
,
P.
Chabera
,
T.
Pullerits
,
A.
Stepanov
,
J.-P.
Wolf
, and
V.
Sundström
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
136
,
5189
(
2014
).
9.
F.
Brivio
,
K. T.
Butler
,
A.
Walsh
, and
M.
van Schilfgaarde
,
Phys. Rev. B
89
,
155204
(
2014
).
10.
X.
Dai
,
H.
Wang
,
Z.
Qian
,
Q.
Yi
,
Y.
Wang
,
S.
Cong
,
J.
Zhao
,
Y.
Sun
,
J.
Huang
,
J.
Xiong
,
H.
Luo
, and
G.
Zou
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
,
203108
(
2015
).
12.
M. F. N.
Taufique
,
R.
Khanal
,
S.
Choudhury
, and
S.
Banerjee
,
J. Chem. Phys.
149
,
164704
(
2018
).
13.
C.
Quarti
,
F.
De Angelis
, and
D.
Beljonne
,
Chem. Mater.
29
,
958
(
2017
).
14.
H. S.
Jung
and
N.-G.
Park
,
Small
11
,
10
(
2015
).
15.
O.
Malinkiewicz
,
A.
Yella
,
Y. H.
Lee
,
G. M.
Espallargas
,
M.
Graetzel
,
M. K.
Nazeeruddin
, and
H. J.
Bolink
,
Nat. Photon.
8
,
128
(
2014
).
16.
J.-Y.
Jeng
,
Y.-F.
Chiang
,
M.-H.
Lee
,
S.-R.
Peng
,
T.-F.
Guo
,
P.
Chen
, and
T.-C.
Wen
,
Adv. Mater.
25
,
3727
(
2013
).
17.
S. Y.
Leblebici
,
L.
Leppert
,
Y.
Li
,
S. E.
Reyes-Lillo
,
S.
Wickenburg
,
E.
Wong
,
J.
Lee
,
M.
Melli
,
D.
Ziegler
,
D. K.
Angell
,
D. F.
Ogletree
,
P. D.
Ashby
,
F. M.
Toma
,
J. B.
Neaton
,
I. D.
Sharp
, and
A.
Weber-Bargioni
,
Nat. Energy
1
,
201693
(
2016
).
18.
Y.
Wang
,
B. G.
Sumpter
,
J.
Huang
,
H.
Zhang
,
P.
Liu
,
H.
Yang
, and
H.
Zhao
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
119
,
1136
(
2015
).
19.
J.
Haruyama
,
K.
Sodeyama
,
L.
Han
, and
Y.
Tateyama
,
Acc. Chem. Res.
49
,
554
(
2016
).
20.
W.
Geng
,
C.-J.
Tong
,
Z.-K.
Tang
,
C.
Yam
,
Y.-N.
Zhang
,
W.-M.
Lau
, and
L.-M.
Liu
,
J. Materiomics
1
,
213
(
2015
).
21.
W.
Geng
,
C.-J.
Tong
,
J.
Liu
,
W.
Zhu
,
W.-M.
Lau
, and
L.-M.
Liu
,
Sci. Rep.
6
,
20131
(
2016
).
22.
M. F. N.
Taufique
,
S. M.
Mortuza
, and
S.
Banerjee
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
120
,
22426
(
2016
).
23.
X.
Huang
,
T. R.
Paudel
,
P. A.
Dowben
,
S.
Dong
, and
E. Y.
Tsymbal
,
Phys. Rev. B
94
,
195309
(
2016
).
24.
S. M.
Mortuza
,
M. F. N.
Taufique
, and
S.
Banerjee
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
394
,
488
(
2017
).
25.
Y.
Takahashi
,
R.
Obara
,
Z.-Z.
Lin
,
Y.
Takahashi
,
T.
Naito
,
T.
Inabe
,
S.
Ishibashi
, and
K.
Terakura
,
Dalton Trans.
40
,
5563
(
2011
).
26.
C. C.
Stoumpos
,
C. D.
Malliakas
, and
M. G.
Kanatzidis
,
Inorg. Chem.
52
,
9019
(
2013
).
27.
Z.
Xiao
and
Y.
Yan
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
7
,
1701136
(
2017
).
28.
J.
Haruyama
,
K.
Sodeyama
,
L.
Han
, and
Y.
Tateyama
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
5
,
2903
(
2014
).
29.
P.
Hohenberg
and
W.
Kohn
,
Phys. Rev.
136
,
B864
(
1964
).
30.
W.
Kohn
and
L. J.
Sham
,
Phys. Rev.
140
,
A1133
(
1965
).
31.
G.
Kresse
and
J.
Furthmüller
,
Comp. Mater. Sci.
6
,
15
(
1996
).
32.
G.
Kresse
and
J.
Furthmüller
,
Phys. Rev. B
54
,
11169
(
1996
).
33.
P. E.
Blöchl
,
Phys. Rev. B
50
,
17953
(
1994
).
34.
G.
Kresse
and
D.
Joubert
,
Phys. Rev. B
59
,
1758
(
1999
).
35.
J. P.
Perdew
,
K.
Burke
, and
M.
Ernzerhof
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
78
,
1396
(
1997
).
36.
M.
Dion
,
H.
Rydberg
,
E.
Schröder
,
D. C.
Langreth
, and
B. I.
Lundqvist
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
92
,
246401
(
2004
).
37.
A.
Poglitsch
and
D.
Weber
,
J. Chem. Phys.
87
,
6373
(
1987
).
38.
H.
Uratani
and
K.
Yamashita
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
8
,
742
(
2017
).
39.
I.
Borriello
,
G.
Cantele
, and
D.
Ninno
,
Phys. Rev. B
77
,
235214
(
2008
).
40.
F.
Chiarella
,
A.
Zappettini
,
F.
Licci
,
I.
Borriello
,
G.
Cantele
,
D.
Ninno
,
A.
Cassinese
, and
R.
Vaglio
,
Phys. Rev. B
77
,
045129
(
2008
).
41.
K.
Yamada
,
Y.
Kuranaga
,
K.
Ueda
,
S.
Goto
,
T.
Okuda
, and
Y.
Furukawa
,
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan
71
,
127
(
1998
).
42.
M.
Roknuzzaman
,
K. K.
Ostrikov
,
K.
Chandula Wasalathilake
,
C.
Yan
,
H.
Wang
, and
T.
Tesfamichael
,
Org. Electron.
59
,
99
(
2018
).
43.
E.
Mosconi
,
J. M.
Azpiroz
, and
F.
De Angelis
,
Chem. Mater.
27
,
4885
(
2015
).
44.
I.
Anusca
,
S.
Balciunas
,
P.
Gemeiner
,
S.
Svirskas
,
M.
Sanlialp
,
G.
Lackner
,
C.
Fettkenhauer
,
J.
Belovickis
,
V.
Samulionis
,
M.
Ivanov
,
B.
Dkhil
,
J.
Banys
,
V. V.
Shvartsman
, and
D. C.
Lupascu
,
Adv. Energy Mater.
7
,
1700600
(
2017
).
45.
R.
Khanal
,
D. B.
Buchholz
,
R. P. H.
Chang
, and
J. E.
Medvedeva
,
Phys. Rev. B
91
,
205203
(
2015
).
46.
P.
Umari
,
E.
Mosconi
, and
F. D.
Angelis
,
Sci. Rep.
4
,
04467
(
2014
).
47.
W.
Geng
,
L.
Zhang
,
Y.-N.
Zhang
,
W.-M.
Lau
, and
L.-M.
Liu
,
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
118
,
19565
(
2014
).
48.
B.
Suarez
,
V.
Gonzalez-Pedro
,
T. S.
Ripolles
,
R. S.
Sanchez
,
L.
Otero
, and
I.
Mora-Sero
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
5
,
1628
(
2014
).
49.
D.
Shi
,
V.
Adinolfi
,
R.
Comin
,
M.
Yuan
,
E.
Alarousu
,
A.
Buin
,
Y.
Chen
,
S.
Hoogland
,
A.
Rothenberger
,
K.
Katsiev
,
Y.
Losovyj
,
X.
Zhang
,
P. A.
Dowben
,
O. F.
Mohammed
,
E. H.
Sargent
, and
O. M.
Bakr
,
Science
347
,
519
(
2015
).
50.
D. A.
Egger
and
L.
Kronik
,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
5
,
2728
(
2014
).
51.
L.-Z.
Wang
,
Y.-Q.
Zhao
,
B.
Liu
,
L.-J.
Wu
, and
M.-Q.
Cai
,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
18
,
22188
(
2016
).
52.
M.
Pazoki
,
T. J.
Jacobsson
,
A.
Hagfeldt
,
G.
Boschloo
, and
T.
Edvinsson
,
Phys. Rev. B
93
,
144105
(
2016
).
53.
A.
Buin
,
R.
Comin
,
J.
Xu
,
A. H.
Ip
, and
E. H.
Sargent
,
Chem. Mater.
27
,
4405
(
2015
).
54.
C.
Bernal
and
K.
Yang
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
118
,
24383
(
2014
).
55.
T.
Umebayashi
,
K.
Asai
,
T.
Kondo
, and
A.
Nakao
,
Phys. Rev. B
67
,
155405
(
2003
).
56.
C.
Grote
and
R. F.
Berger
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
119
,
22832
(
2015
).
57.
M. R.
Linaburg
,
E. T.
McClure
,
J. D.
Majher
, and
P. M.
Woodward
,
Chem. Mater.
29
,
3507
(
2017
).
58.
M. F. N.
Taufique
,
S.
Choudhury
, and
S.
Banerjee
, “
The energetics of solvent-based deposition of fullerene derivative on inorganic-organic hybrid lead halide perovskite surface
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
(submitted).

Supplementary Material