Vanadium dioxide (VO2) monoclinic nanosheets were synthesized by a solvothermal method and carbonized iron-polyaniline (C-FP) nanograins were prepared by pyrolysis of iron-polyaniline (PANI) mixture under nitrogen ambient. An asymmetric device (VO2//C-FP) was evaluated with VO2 and C-FP as positive and negative material electrodes in aqueous 6 M KOH electrolyte respectively. The asymmetric supercapacitor (VO2//C-FP) exhibited a 47 mA h g-1 specific capacity and a specific energy of 30 W h kg−1 with an associated specific power of 713 W kg−1 at a gravimetric current of 1 A g−1 in a potential window of 1.6 V. It also displayed an 89% energy efficiency after 10000 galvanostatic charge-discharge cycles with a large improvement after ageing test at a gravimetric current of 10 A g-1.

Supercapacitors (SCs), also called electrochemical capacitors (ECs) have been on the forefront of research owing to their relatively high power density (15 kW kg-1), low specific energy (<10 W h kg-1) and a long lifetime.1–6 To date, the scientific community is working towards increasing the specific energy of SCs by using ingenious device design.7 SCs can be classified into three types of capacitors based on their charge storage mechanism: (i) The electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), where charge build-up at the boundary between the electrode and the electrolyte is responsible for the energy storage and the common materials used are carbon-based materials.2,8 (ii) The faradaic capacitor which as their names suggest, involve redox or faradaic reaction and is mainly displayed in transition metal oxides, metal hydroxides, metal sulfides and conducting polymers.9–13 (iii) The hybrid capacitors which are the combination of both EDLC and faradaic materials. A subclass of hybrid capacitors is the asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) which are composed of a positive and a negative electrodes with dissimilar charge storage mechanisms. Generally, the positive electrodes are the faradaic materials14–21 while the negative electrodes are mostly made of carbon-based materials.22–26 The Hybrid capacitors have been proposed and considered as a promising solution to improve the low specific capacitance from carbon-based materials and the low conductivity and poor cycle stability of the transition metal oxides/hydroxides.27 

Carbon-based materials such as activated carbon,28 carbon nanotube29 and graphene30 have been demonstrated to be a good electrode materials in supercapacitor due to their excellent conductivity combined with their good stability.31 

The transition metal oxide used as supercapacitor electrode materials exhibit a high specific capacity as compared to carbon-based materials owing to its multiple oxidations states.

Amongst the low-cost metal oxides, vanadium oxides (e.g. VO2, V2O5, V2O3, and V4O7) have received recent attention32–40 which is linked to their abundant sources, and ability to exist in variable oxidation states.41 

Vanadium dioxide (VO2) has an exciting phase with a rich polymorphic stable and metastable forms included VO2 (A), VO2 (M), VO2 (R), VO2 (B), VO2 (T) and VO2 (bcc).42,43 VO2 (A), VO2 (M) and VO2 (B) are the most attractive due to their tuneable and the relatively easy synthesis process.42,44 The VO2 materials change from monoclinic (at a temperature about 68°C) to tetragonal structure reversibly (at a temperatures higher than the 68 °C) and can undergo semiconductor-to-metal transition.45–50 VO2 (B) electrodes with a metastable monoclinic structure is a potential electrode material in supercapacitor.51 

As compared to vanadium pentoxide (V2O5), there are few report on vanadium dioxide for asymmetric supercapacitor. For instance, Wang et al. synthesized a graphene/VO2 composite material for a positive and a negative electrodes. They assembled a symmetric supercapacitor (graphene/VO2//graphene/VO2) using 0.5 M Na2SO4 as an aqueous electrolyte. The graphene/VO2//graphene/VO2 symmetric device showed a specific energy of 21.3 W h kg−1 at 1 A g-1. The graphene/VO2 composite showed a cycling stability with 92% after 5000th cycles at 10 A g−1.52 Similarly Ma et al.48 prepared a vanadium dioxide electrode using for a symmetric supercapacitor in 1 M Na2SO4. The VO2//VO2 symmetric device exhibited a specific energy of 21.3 W h kg−1 corresponding to a specific power of 207.2 W kg−1 at a gravimetric current of 0.25 A g−1. They reported a cycling efficiency of 78.7% after 5.000 cycles at a specific current of 0.5 A g−1.48 

In our previous study, we synthesized the vanadium dioxide monoclinic (VO2 (B)) through a solvothermal method. In a three electrode configuration the VO2 (B) displayed a specific capacity of 49.28 mAh g-1 at current density of 0.5 A g-1 in aqueous electrolyte (6 M KOH).53 

The present work reports the fabrication of a novel asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) based on VO2 (B) monoclinic as a positive electrode and carbonized iron-polyaniline (C-FP) as a negative electrode. The VO2//C-FP ASC tested in aqueous electrolyte (6 M KOH) was able to reach a potential window of 1.6 V. The asymmetric device exhibited a specific energy and power of 30 W h kg−1 and 713 W kg−1 respectively at 1 A g−1. In addition, the ASC showed an 89% energy efficiency after 10000 galvanostatic charge-discharge cycles with a large improvement after ageing test at a gravimetric current of 10 A g-1.

Vanadium (V) oxide (V2O5, purity ≥98%), oxalic acid dehydrate (C2H2O4·2H2O purity 99%), iron (III) nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O purity 99-100%), ammonium peroxydisulfate ((NH4)2S2O8) purity 98%), aniline hydrochloride (C6H5NH2·HCl purity ≥99%) and propan-2-ol (CH3CHOHCH3 purity 99.5%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) and ethanol (C2H6O purity 99%) were purchased from Merck (South Africa). Polycrystalline nickel foam (thickness of 1.6 mm) was obtained from Alantum (Munich, Germany).

1. Preparation of vanadium dioxide (VO2)

The synthesis of the VO2 material was carried out using solvothermal method. Initially, 1.2 g of V2O5 powder and 2.49 g of H2C2O4·2H2O was added to 40 mL of deionized water and stirred for 3 h, thereafter, a 6 mL of the homogeneous solution was added to 60 mL of isopropanol under continuous stirring for 20 min.

The solution was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and kept at 200 °C for 6 h. The recovered powder was washed several times with deionized water followed by ethanol and dried at 60 °C in an electric oven.53 

2. Synthesis of polyaniline (PANI)

0.2 M aniline hydrochloride (C6H5NH2·HCl) (2.59 g dissolved in 50 mL deionized water) was added to 0.25 M ammonium peroxydisulfate (NH4)2S2O8) (5.71 g in 50 mL deionized water) and mixed overnight.

3. Preparation of carbonized iron-PANI (C-FP)

Briefly, 0.2 g of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and 0.0125 g of PANI were dissolved in 50 ml of ethanol and sonicated in the ultra-sonication bath.

After ethanol was almost completely evaporated, the mixture was coated on a nickel (Ni) foam acting as a current collector and pyrolyzed for 2 h under the N2 atmosphere at 850 °C. The full detailed description of the C-FP can be found in our previous paper.54 

The structural properties of the samples were analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) powder using an XPERT-PRO diffractometer (PANalytical BV, The Netherlands) with theta/2theta configuration. The morphology of the materials synthesized was characterized by a high-resolution Zeiss Ultra plus 55 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), operated at a voltage of 2.0 kV and a JEOL JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope (TEM). The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern were taken with a JEOL JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope (TEM) and were used to evaluate the elemental composition of the produced materials. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, Thermo Fisher) was used to analyse the elemental composition of the materials with a monochromatic Al-Kα radiation.

Three - and two electrode configurations were adopted to study the electrochemical properties of the VO2 and C-FP electrodes.

The electrochemical characterizations were carried out using a Bio-Logic VMP-300 (Knoxville TN 37,930, USA) potentiostat monitored by the EC-Lab® V10.37 software. In the three-electrode configuration, Ag/AgCl (KCl saturated) served as the reference electrode, a glassy carbon plate as the counter electrode and 6 M KOH as the electrolyte. The VO2 electrode was prepared as follows: 85 wt% of the active material was added to 10 wt% of carbon black as conducting additive and 5 wt% of polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) binder in an agate mortar. Few drops of 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) were added to the mixture to form a slurry, which was pasted on nickel foam (NiF) acting as a current collector and dried at 60 °C in the electric oven for overnight.

Thereafter, the asymmetric supercapacitor consisting of VO2 positive electrode and C-FP negative electrode was coupled in a coin cell with glass micro-fiber filter paper was used as a separator.

Figure 1 display the X-ray diffraction patterns of VO2 and C-FP materials. The diffraction peaks of the VO2 materials are indexed as VO2(B) monoclinic structure as shown in Fig. 1(a). It also shows that vanadium dioxide synthesized at 200 °C has a space group of C 1 2/m 1.53 XRD pattern of C-FP powder material without pasting on the substrate (Ni foam) is shown in Fig. 1(b). The diffraction peaks of C-FP material are indexed to orthorhombic structures of Fe3C and FeS with a space group of P nma.54,55

FIG. 1.

The XRD patterns of (a) vanadium dioxide (VO2) and (b) carbonized iron-polyaniline (C-FP).

FIG. 1.

The XRD patterns of (a) vanadium dioxide (VO2) and (b) carbonized iron-polyaniline (C-FP).

Close modal

Figure 2 present the SEM micrographs of the as-prepared VO2 and C-FP materials at low and high magnifications.

FIG. 2.

The SEM images of the as-prepared (a-b) VO2 and (c-d) C-FP at low and high magnifications.

FIG. 2.

The SEM images of the as-prepared (a-b) VO2 and (c-d) C-FP at low and high magnifications.

Close modal

Figure 2(a) shows the SEM micrographs of the VO2 which reveals the nanosheets-like structure on the microspheres surface. In Fig. (2b), the micrographs of VO2 exhibits a vertically grown sheet-like structure. Figure 2(c–d) shows SEM micrographs of the C-FP which unveiled agglomerated nanograin morphology. The micrographs of the C-FP materials were showed lattice fringes attributed to the Fe cations on PANI and have been discussed in References 51 and 54.

The morphologies and the elemental composition of VO2 materials were further studied with transmission electron microscope (TEM) and the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) analysis.

Figure 3(a) displays the TEM micrograph of VO2 at high magnification which reveals clearly the nanosheets structure as shown in Fig. 2(b). The SAED pattern of the VO2(B) nanosheets in Fig. 3(b) exhibits the presence of well-defined rings, indicates the poly-crystallinity of the VO2 monoclinic.

FIG. 3.

(a) TEM at high magnification micrograph and (b) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the VO2 nanosheets.

FIG. 3.

(a) TEM at high magnification micrograph and (b) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the VO2 nanosheets.

Close modal

To further evaluate the surface characterization of VO2 material, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to determine the chemistry of the material. The core level spectrum of V2p reveals two chemical states of vanadium which are related to excitations of electrons from the V2p3/2 and V2p1/2 core levels, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4(a).

FIG. 4.

(a) V2p binding energy region and (b) O1s binding energy regions of the VO2 nanosheets.

FIG. 4.

(a) V2p binding energy region and (b) O1s binding energy regions of the VO2 nanosheets.

Close modal

The predominant peak located at 516.5 eV in the V2p3/2 binding energy suggests a vanadium oxidation state of 4+ which confirms the formation of VO2.56 Futhermore, as presented in Fig. 4(b), the core level spectrum of O1s displayed the main peak located at 529.7 eV which is ascribed to the component associated to oxygen in VO2.57 

To construct the asymmetric hybrid supercapacitor of VO2//C-FP, we, firstly, evaluated the electrochemical performance of the positive VO2 and negative C-FP electrodes in a three-electrode system using 6 M KOH electrolyte with Ni foam and Ag/AgCl (KCl saturated) as a current collector and reference electrode, respectively.

Figure 5(a) shows the cyclic voltammogram (CV) profile of the VO2 electrode at different sweep rates (from 5 to 100 mV s-1) within a potential window range of 0.0 - 0.5 V. The appearance of a pair of redox peaks associated with an anodic peak at ∼0.13 V and cathodic peak ∼0.23 V at 5mV s-1 reveal a faradaic material. As observed in Fig. 5(a), these peaks are broader compared to those exhibited by battery-like material which is typically narrower and indicative of the occurrence of a redox reaction at a constant potential.58 

FIG. 5.

(a) cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves at different sweep rates, (b) charge and discharge (CD) curves of the VO2 at different specific current, (c) CV curves at different scan rates, (d) CD curves of the C-FP at different specific current and (e) specific capacities for the VO2 and C-FP at different specific current.

FIG. 5.

(a) cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves at different sweep rates, (b) charge and discharge (CD) curves of the VO2 at different specific current, (c) CV curves at different scan rates, (d) CD curves of the C-FP at different specific current and (e) specific capacities for the VO2 and C-FP at different specific current.

Close modal

The broadness of the peak in faradaic materials is expected as a result of the presence of non-standard sites and defects in the polycrystalline structure. This agrees with the low crystallinity of the VO2 as recorded from XRD diffraction pattern.58 

Figure 5(b) shows the charge-discharge (CD) of the vanadium dioxide curve at different specific currents. Each discharge curve displays a non-linear curve confirming the faradaic behavior of this electrode material.

Moreover, even at a low specific current of 1 A g-1, the discharge profile does not show an extended plateau as is the case for batteries.59Figure 5(c) shows the CV curve of the C-FP electrode at different sweep rates from 5 to 100 mV s-1 in a negative potential window range of -1.2 - 0.0 V.

These CV curves show non-rectangular shapes with no apparent redox peaks. However, Fig. 5(d) which shows the charge-discharge curves at different specific currents in the voltage window of -1.2 to 0.0 V of the C-FP electrode, depicting a non-linear charge-discharge, suggesting a pseudocapacitive activity in this electrode material.

From the chronopotentiometry profile of the VO2 and C-FP electrodes, the specific capacity, Q (measured in mA h g-1) of the VO2 and C-FP electrodes was determined using:

(1)

where Id is defined as the specific current measured in A g-1 and tD is the time in second (s) for a complete discharge cycle.

Figure 5(e) depicts the values of the specific capacity for the VO2 and C-FP electrodes as a function of increasing specific current. The specific capacity values of 49.3 and 107 mA h g-1 were recorded for the VO2 and C-FP material electrodes respectively, at a gravimetric current of 0.5 A g-1. This can be related to the thin nanosheets structure of VO2, which will ensure faster ion and electron transport. Also, the high capacitive characteristic observed in the C-FP can be attributed to the conductive framework, which allows an excellent electric contact and consequently enhances the capacitance performance. Additionally, it can be observed that these two materials (VO2 and C-FP) are stable in each of its potential windows.

With the aim of optimizing the performance of ASC, the device was assembled using VO2 as positive and C-FP as negative electrodes, respectively, in 6 M KOH.

The charge equilibrium (QVO2B=QcFP) was used to balance the masses of both electrodes in the asymmetric cell. This generates equation 2 and 3 which were used to balance the masses:

(2)
(3)

where mVO2B,mcFP,QVO2B,QcFP describes the mass loading and total charge of the VO2 and C-FP electrodes, I is given as the applied current and tD is the time of discharge to 0 V. The mass ratio of the VO2 to C-FP was adopted as 2:1 and the mass loading per unit area of the VO2 and C-FP electrodes was recorded as 2.24 and 1.12 mg cm-2, respectively) According to the charge balance, the mass loading of active VO2 and C-FP on the current collector were measured as 4 and 2 mg, respectively in line with equation 3 above.

Figure 6(a) shows the CV curves of VO2 and C-FP measured in the stable working potential window at a sweep rate of 50 mV s-1, a working potential window of 1.7 V could be predicted for the asymmetric device.

FIG. 6.

(a) cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of VO2 and C-FP electrodes at 50 mV s-1 for three-electrode setup, for the asymmetric device of the VO2//C-FP (b) CV, (c) CD and (d) specific capacity at different specific current and (e) Ragone plot.

FIG. 6.

(a) cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of VO2 and C-FP electrodes at 50 mV s-1 for three-electrode setup, for the asymmetric device of the VO2//C-FP (b) CV, (c) CD and (d) specific capacity at different specific current and (e) Ragone plot.

Close modal

Figure 6(b) shows the CV graphs of the VO2//C-FP asymmetric device at different sweep rates (5 to 200 mV s-1). However, the maximum working potential limit of the VO2//C-FP device was recorded to be 1.6 V.

There is no apparent current leap within the operating cell potential window of 1.6 V, suggesting the stability of the device within this potential window. The CD curves of VO2//C-F at different specific currents (1 to 10 Ag-1) are shown in Fig. 6(c). The CD curves exhibit faradaic behavior owing to the high redox activity observed from the CV curves of the asymmetric device. The specific capacity of the VO2//C-FP device was calculated using equation (1) and is shown in Fig. 6(d) as a function of specific current.

The specific capacity of the VO2//C-FP device reaches a value of 47 mA h g-1 at a gravimetric current of 1 A g-1. This value is well positioned between those obtained for VO2 and C-FP electrodes from the three electrode measurements, at the same specific current. In other words, the specific capacity value of the hybrid device is much higher than that of VO2 (43.4 mA h g-1) and lower than that of C-FP (79 mA h g-1) calculated in the three-electrode configuration at a gravimetric current of 1 A g-1. This shows a good synergistic improvement by combining these two materials to form a hybrid device.

Figure 6(e) displays the Ragone plot presenting the specific power versus the specific energy of the asymmetric device obtained at different specific currents. The specific energy and the specific power of the device were obtained using equations (4) and (5) respectively.60 

(4)
(5)

where Ed (W h kg-1) and Pd (W kg-1) are the total specific energy and specific power respectively. Id is the specific current in A g-1, t is the discharge time (s) and V is the working potential window (V) of the V02//C-FP device.

The maximum specific energy value of 30 Wh kg-1 was recorded for the VO2//C-FP device with an associated specific power value of 713 W kg-1 at a 1 A g-1 specific current. This is maintained at 9.1 W h kg−1 for a specific power of 7.9 kW kg−1 at 10 A g-1. The high specific energy and specific power of the ASC are attributed to a high specific capacity and device wide operating voltage. This is also related to the good stability, fast kinetics of charge/discharge process61 and the high ionic conductivity of the electrolyte ions, i.e., 73.5 and 198 Scm2 mol-1 for K+ and OH, respectively.26 

In order to study the stability of the device, it was subjected to 10000 cycles at the high gravimetric current of 10 A g-1 and the results are shown in Fig. 7(a).

FIG. 7.

(a) Stability test showing energy efficiency and capacity retention for up to 10000th cycles at a constant gravimetric current of 10 A g-1, (b) specific capacity as function of floating time at 10 A g-1, (c) specific energy as function of holding time at 10 A g-1, (d) EIS before and after 10000th cycles and 70h voltage holding of the VO2//C-FP asymmetric cell.

FIG. 7.

(a) Stability test showing energy efficiency and capacity retention for up to 10000th cycles at a constant gravimetric current of 10 A g-1, (b) specific capacity as function of floating time at 10 A g-1, (c) specific energy as function of holding time at 10 A g-1, (d) EIS before and after 10000th cycles and 70h voltage holding of the VO2//C-FP asymmetric cell.

Close modal

An energy efficiency of the device was calculated using equation (6)

(6)

where ηE, Ed and Ec are energy efficiency, discharge energy and charge energy from the charge-discharge curve of the VO2//C-FP device respectively.

The energy efficiency of 89% is obtained with good capacity retention of 78.5% at the 10 000th constant charge-discharge cycle, signifying good electrochemical stability of the device. The further additional stability test was performed after cycling measurement on the cell using the voltage holding test (also called floating test).62 It has the ability to determine a direct insight into the possible effect and degradation phenomena which might occur during the electrochemical process.63 The voltage holding test was designed to analyse the device specific capacity at each 10 h period of the potential holding step for up to 70 h. This is following by three GCD to exhibit any change in the cell device with floating over a time of 70 h. The specific capacity as a function of floating time is presented in Fig. 7(b) for 70 h at 10 A g-1.

It exhibits an increase in the specific capacity value for up to 30 h period of voltage holding time before becoming constant. The increase in the specific capacity could be linked to the evolution of accessible redox sites during the ageing experiment.

This improvement is even more striking when the specific energy was calculated after each voltage holding as shown in Fig. 7(c). Within the first 10 h of voltage holding, the specific energy increases by 32% to finally stabilize after 30 h of floating test, at 15 W h kg-1, corresponding to an impressive increase of 65% from the original 9.1 W h kg-1 at 10 A g-1. It shows that the cell voltage (1.6 V) is stable using 6 M KOH. As compared to other hybrid devices our group has reported this increase is better than that of Co3(PO4)2·4H2O/GF//C-FP (2.2% from the original value of 9.1 Wh Kg−1)64 as earlier reported for hybrid asymmetric capacitors. Thus, the floating test should be considered as a viable option for optimizing the properties of this cell.

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) measurement of the device was performed in an open voltage from 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz frequencies. The Nyquist plot of the asymmetric device (VO2//C-FP), before stability, after the 10.000 constant galvanostatic cycles and after voltage holding are shown in Fig. 7(d). The equivalent series resistance (ESR) value of the asymmetric device (VO2//C-FP) was 1.55 Ω before and after 10000th cycles. However, after voltage holding, the ESR decreased to 1 Ω followed by a shorter diffusion length of the electrolyte ions. This low value of ESR confirm the good contact between the electrolyte and the surface of the electrode materials. Thus, any degradation of the cell has been not observed after the voltage holding. More explicitly, no change in the equivalent series resistance was noticed after stability. Two main changes in the impedance could explain the electrochemical improvement of the cell after voltage holding. However, the diffusion was reduced after the stability test. Upon voltage holding, the diffusion length is markedly reduced followed by reduction of the solution resistance. These reductions can significantly enhance the performance of the cell by a fast collection of charges.

Table I compares the asymmetric VO2//C-FP device with some others devices reported in the literature. The cell shows higher values when compared with other devices.4,48,52,65 This demonstrates the excellent choice of tandem materials for this asymmetric device.

TABLE I.

Comparison of electrochemical properties of VO2//C-FP with previous supercapacitors comprised of VO2.

Specific Specific Specific
current energy power
Materials (A/g) (Wh/Kg) (W/Kg) References
GF(0.1)/VO2//GF  0.25  22.8  425  4   
VO2//VO2  0.25  21.3  207.2  48   
Graphene/VO2//  21.3  52   
graphene/VO2 
GF+VO2//HMB  14.5  720  65   
VO2//C-FP  1   30   713   This work  
2   25   1806  
Specific Specific Specific
current energy power
Materials (A/g) (Wh/Kg) (W/Kg) References
GF(0.1)/VO2//GF  0.25  22.8  425  4   
VO2//VO2  0.25  21.3  207.2  48   
Graphene/VO2//  21.3  52   
graphene/VO2 
GF+VO2//HMB  14.5  720  65   
VO2//C-FP  1   30   713   This work  
2   25   1806  

We have successfully synthesized VO2(B) nanosheets by a solvothermal method and C-FP material by pyrolysis of an iron-PANI mixture under nitrogen atmosphere. An ASC cell was fabricated from VO2 adopted as positive and C-FP as the negative electrodes operated with an aqueous 6 M KOH electrolyte. The asymmetrical device exhibited a specific capacity of 47 mA h g-1 with a high specific energy of 30 W h kg-1 and the corresponding specific power of 713 W kg-1 at 1 A g-1 with 1.6 cell potential. These values are far better as compared to those studies previously published for related devices as indicated in Table I above. The excellent stability performance of the VO2//C-FP device was demonstrated up to 10000 cycles at a specific current of 10 A g-1. In addition, the voltage holding data obtained after testing for a period of 70 h shows a significant improvement in device specific capacity and energy after a period of 10 h at 10 A g-1. This result confirms that the performance of the VO2//C-FP device increase after the voltage holding test. This asymmetric supercapacitor from VO2//C-FP exhibits impressive electrochemical performance and hence making the device excellent for energy storage applications.

This research was supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant No. 61056). Any idea, finding, conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s). The NRF does not accept any liability in this regard. N. M. Ndiaye thanks Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD) and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), NRF through SARChI in Carbon Technology and Materials and the University of Pretoria for financial support.

1.
W. Y.
Tsai
,
P. C.
Gao
,
B.
Daffos
,
P. L.
Taberna
,
C. R.
Perez
,
Y.
Gogotsi
,
F.
Favier
, and
P.
Simon
,
Electrochemistry Communications
34
,
109
(
2013
).
2.
H.
Li
,
B.
Wang
,
X.
He
,
J.
Xiao
,
H.
Zhang
,
Q.
Liu
,
J.
Liu
,
J.
Wang
,
L.
Liu
, and
P.
Wang
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
3
,
9754
(
2015
).
3.
P.
Simon
and
Y.
Gogotsi
,
Nat. Mater.
7
,
845
(
2008
).
4.
L.
Deng
,
G.
Zhang
,
L.
Kang
,
Z.
Lei
,
C.
Liu
, and
Z.-H. H.
Liu
,
Electrochimica Acta
112
,
448
(
2013
).
5.
P. S. J. R.
Miller
,
J.
Miller
,
P.
Simon
, and
P. S. J. R.
Miller
,
Science
321
,
651
(
2008
).
6.
B. E.
Conway
,
Kluwer Academic
10
,
221
(
1999
).
7.
Z.
Yu
,
L.
Tetard
,
L.
Zhai
, and
J.
Thomas
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
8
,
702
(
2015
).
8.
P.
Simon
,
Y.
Gogotsi
, and
B.
Dunn
,
Science
343
,
1210
(
2014
).
9.
B. E.
Conway
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
138
,
1539
(
1991
).
10.
J. T.
Mefford
,
W. G.
Hardin
,
S.
Dai
,
K. P.
Johnston
, and
K. J.
Stevenson
,
Nature Materials
13
,
726
(
2014
).
11.
Y.
Xiao
,
W.-Y.
Wang
,
S.-W.
Chou
,
T.-W.
Lin
, and
J.-Y.
Lin
,
Journal of Power Sources
266
,
448
(
2014
).
12.
M.-N.
Lu
,
C.-S.
Dai
,
S.-Y.
Tai
,
T.-W.
Lin
, and
J.-Y.
Lin
,
Journal of Power Sources
270
,
499
(
2014
).
13.
T.-W.
Lin
,
M.-C.
Hsiao
,
S.-W.
Chou
,
H.-H.
Shen
, and
J.-Y.
Lin
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
162
,
A1493
(
2015
).
14.
B.
Rong-Rong
,
W.
Xing-Long
,
C.
Fei-Fei
,
J.
Ling-Yan
,
G.
Yu-Guo
, and
W.
Li-Jun
,
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
114
,
2448
(
2010
).
15.
H.
Jiang
,
C.
Li
,
T.
Sun
, and
J.
Ma
,
Nanoscale
4
,
807
(
2012
).
16.
J.
Zhu
,
L.
Huang
,
Y.
Xiao
,
L.
Shen
,
Q.
Chen
, and
W.
Shi
,
Nanoscale
6
,
6772
(
2014
).
17.
J.-W.
Lang
,
L.-B.
Kong
,
W.-J.
Wu
,
Y.-C.
Luo
, and
L.
Kang
,
Chemical Communications
104
,
4213
(
2008
).
18.
L.-M. M.
Chen
,
Q.-Y. Y.
Lai
,
Y.-J. J.
Hao
,
Y.
Zhao
,
X.-Y. Y.
Ji
,
Y. Z.
Lian-Mei Chen
,
Q.-Y.
Lai
,
H.
Yan-Jing
, and
X.-Y.
Ji
,
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
467
,
465
(
2009
).
19.
W.
Xiao
,
Asymmetric Capacitor Based on Vanadium Dioxide/Graphene/Nickle and Carbon Nanotube Electrode
(
University of Akron
,
2014
).
20.
A.
Rudge
,
J.
Davey
,
I.
Raistrick
,
S.
Gottesfeld
, and
J. P.
Ferraris
,
Journal of Power Sources
47
,
89
(
1994
).
21.
H.
Li
,
Y.
Gao
,
C.
Wang
, and
G.
Yang
,
Advanced Energy Materials
5
,
1401767
(
2015
).
22.
J.
Huang
,
P.
Xu
,
D.
Cao
,
X.
Zhou
,
S.
Yang
,
Y.
Li
, and
G.
Wang
,
Journal of Power Sources
246
,
371
(
2014
).
23.
R. R.
Salunkhe
,
J.
Lin
,
V.
Malgras
,
S. X.
Dou
,
J. H.
Kim
, and
Y.
Yamauchi
,
Nano Energy
11
,
211
(
2015
).
24.
J.
Yan
,
Z.
Fan
,
W.
Sun
,
G.
Ning
,
T.
Wei
,
Q.
Zhang
,
R.
Zhang
,
L.
Zhi
, and
F.
Wei
,
Advanced Functional Materials
22
,
2632
(
2012
).
25.
B. G.
Choi
,
S.-J.
Chang
,
H.-W.
Kang
,
C. P.
Park
,
H. J.
Kim
,
W. H.
Hong
,
S.
Lee
, and
Y. S.
Huh
,
Nanoscale
4
,
4983
(
2012
).
26.
Y.-G.
Wang
,
L.
Cheng
, and
Y.-Y.
Xia
,
Journal of Power Sources
153
,
191
(
2006
).
27.
D. P.
Dubal
,
O.
Ayyad
,
V.
Ruiz
, and
P.
Gómez-Romero
,
Hybrid Energy Storage: The Merging of Battery and Supercapacitor Chemistries
(
Royal Society of Chemistry
,
2015
), pp.
1777
1790
.
28.
D.
Salinas-Torres
,
J. M.
Sieben
,
D.
Lozano-Castelló
,
D.
Cazorla-Amorós
, and
E.
Morallón
,
Electrochimica Acta
89
,
326
(
2013
).
29.
Q.
Wang
,
J.
Yan
,
Y.
Wang
,
G.
Ning
,
Z.
Fan
,
T.
Wei
,
J.
Cheng
,
M.
Zhang
, and
X.
Jing
,
Carbon
52
,
209
(
2013
).
30.
Y.
Fang
,
B.
Luo
,
Y.
Jia
,
X.
Li
,
B.
Wang
,
Q.
Song
,
F.
Kang
, and
L.
Zhi
,
Advanced Materials
24
,
6348
(
2012
).
31.
L. L.
Zhang
and
X. S.
Zhao
,
Chemical Society Reviews
38
,
2520
(
2009
).
32.
W. F.
Mak
,
G.
Wee
,
V.
Aravindan
,
N.
Gupta
,
S. G.
Mhaisalkar
, and
S.
Madhavi
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
159
,
A1481
(
2012
).
33.
E.
Umeshbabu
and
G.
Ranga Rao
,
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
472
,
210
(
2016
).
34.
H.
Zhao
,
L.
Pan
,
S.
Xing
,
J.
Luo
, and
J.
Xu
,
Journal of Power Sources
222
,
21
(
2013
).
35.
M. H.
Bai
,
L. J.
Bian
,
Y.
Song
, and
X. X.
Liu
,
ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
6
,
12656
(
2014
).
36.
X.
Pan
,
G.
Ren
,
M. N. F.
Hoque
,
S.
Bayne
,
K.
Zhu
, and
Z.
Fan
,
Advanced Materials Interfaces
1
,
1400398
(
2014
).
37.
H.
Li
,
K.
Jiao
,
L.
Wang
,
C.
Wei
, and
B.
Xie
,
Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability
2
,
18806
(
2014
).
38.
G. P.
Nagabhushana
and
G. T.
Chandrappa
,
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
1
,
11539
(
2013
).
39.
I.
Derkaoui
,
M.
Khenfouch
,
I.
Elmokri
,
S. J.
Moloi
,
B. M.
Mothudi
,
M. S.
Dhlamini
,
M.
Maaza
,
I.
Zorkani
, and
A.
Jorio
,
Graphene
5
,
14
(
2016
).
40.
S.
Kachi
,
T.
Takada
, and
K.
Kosuge
,
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
18
,
1839
(
1963
).
41.
H.
Hosseini
and
S.
Shahrokhian
,
Applied Materials Today
10
,
72
(
2018
).
42.
S.
Rao Popuri
,
A.
Artemenko
,
C.
Labrugere
,
M.
Miclau
,
A.
Villesuzanne
, and
M.
Pollet
,
Journal of Solid State Chemistry
213
,
79
(
2014
).
43.
Y.
Wang
and
Z.
Zhang
,
Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures
41
,
548
(
2009
).
44.
Y.
Oka
,
S.
Sato
,
T.
Yao
, and
N.
Yamamoto
,
Journal of Solid State Chemistry
141
,
594
(
1998
).
45.
X.
Pan
,
Y.
Zhao
,
G.
Ren
, and
Z.
Fan
,
Chemical Communications
49
,
3943
(
2013
).
46.
S.
Surnev
,
M. G.
Ramsey
, and
F. P.
Netzer
,
Progress in Surface Science
73
,
117
(
2003
).
47.
X.
Xiao
,
S.
Li
,
H.
Wei
,
D.
Sun
,
Y.
Wu
,
G.
Jin
,
F.
Wang
, and
Y.
Zou
,
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
26
,
4226
(
2015
).
48.
X.-J. J.
Ma
,
W.-B.
Bin Zhang
,
L.-B.
Bin Kong
,
Y.-C. C.
Luo
, and
L.
Kang
,
RSC Advances
5
,
97239
(
2015
).
49.
K.
Tang
,
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Li
,
H.
Cao
,
Z.
Zhang
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
J.
Yang
,
Electrochimica Acta
209
,
709
(
2016
).
50.
L.
Danxia
,
H.
Wanxia
,
S.
Linwei
, and
S.
Qiwu
,
Advanced Materials Research
1120
,
158
(
2015
).
51.
Y.
Oka
,
T.
Yao
, and
N.
Yamamoto
,
Journal of Solid State Chemistry
86
,
116
(
1990
).
52.
H.
Wang
,
H.
Yi
,
X.
Chen
,
X.
Wang
,
D. W.
Liu
,
J.
Liu
,
G. Z.
Cao
,
P. M.
Ajayan
, and
F.
Wei
,
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
2
,
1165
(
2014
).
53.
N. M. M.
Ndiaye
,
T. M. M.
Masikhwa
,
B. D. D.
Ngom
,
M. J. J.
Madito
,
K. O. O.
Oyedotun
,
J. K. K.
Dangbegnon
, and
N.
Manyala
,
Materials Chemistry and Physics
214
,
192
(
2018
).
54.
M. N.
Rantho
,
M. J.
Madito
, and
N.
Manyala
,
Electrochimica Acta
262
,
82
(
2018
).
55.
T. M.
Masikhwa
,
D. Y.
Momodu
,
K. O.
Oyedotun
,
A. A.
Mirghni
,
N. M.
Ndiaye
, and
N.
Manyala
,
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
769
,
376
(
2018
).
56.
C.-T.
Wang
and
H.-H.
Huang
,
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
354
,
3336
(
2008
).
57.
E. Z.
Kurmaev
,
V. M.
Cherkashenko
,
Y. M.
Yarmoshenko
,
S.
Bartkowski
,
A.
V Postnikov
,
M.
Neumann
,
L.-C.
Duda
,
J. H.
Guo
,
J.
Nordgren
,
V. A.
Perelyaev
, and
W.
Reichelt
,
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
10
,
4081
(
1998
).
58.
A.
Eftekhari
and
M.
Mohamedi
,
Materials Today Energy
6
,
211
(
2017
).
59.
A.
Eftekhari
,
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
1
,
2053
(
2017
).
60.
X. X.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhang
,
C.
Zhi
,
X. X.
Wang
,
D.
Tang
,
Y.
Xu
,
Q.
Weng
,
X.
Jiang
,
M.
Mitome
,
D.
Golberg
, and
Y.
Bando
,
Nature Communications
4
,
2905
(
2013
).
61.
A.
Leela Mohana Reddy
,
F.
Estaline Amitha
,
I.
Jafri
, and
S.
Ramaprabhu
,
Nanoscale Research Letters
3
,
145
(
2008
).
62.
D.
Weingarth
,
H.
Noh
,
A.
Foelske-Schmitz
,
A.
Wokaun
, and
R.
Kötz
,
Electrochimica Acta
103
,
119
(
2013
).
63.
A.
Bello
,
F.
Barzegar
,
M. J.
Madito
,
D. Y.
Momodu
,
A. A.
Khaleed
,
T. M.
Masikhwa
,
J. K.
Dangbegnon
, and
N.
Manyala
,
Electrochimica Acta
213
,
107
(
2016
).
64.
A. A.
Mirghni
,
D.
Momodu
,
K. O.
Oyedotun
,
J. K.
Dangbegnon
, and
N.
Manyala
,
Electrochimica Acta
283
,
374
(
2018
).
65.
X.
Xia
,
D.
Chao
,
C. F.
Ng
,
J.
Lin
,
Z.
Fan
,
H.
Zhang
,
Z. X.
Shen
, and
H. J.
Fan
,
Mater. Horiz.
2
,
237
(
2015
).