We use Kerr microscopy to characterize magnetic domain walls in Co/Ni based magnetic nanowires grown on a Pt seedlayer with a thin Ptx(Ir,Au)1−x buffer layer. The buffer layer composition enables control of the interfacial DMI vector as measured from the asymmetric bubble expansion technique while the thicker Pt seedlayer is expected to govern the spin Hall angle. Additions of either Ir or Au to the Pt buffer layer give rise to a marked drop in the interfacial DMI vector. The efficiency of current induced magnetic domain wall motion in nanowires shows a direct relation to DMI across the composition spectrum. This correlation is discussed in the context of future spintronic devices as a mechanism for engineering the spin-orbit coupling properties of complex magnetic multi-layers.

The union of strong spin-orbit coupling in 5d heavy metals and conventional ferromagnetism in 3d transition metals has lead to new spin phenomena in complex magnetic multi-layers. This includes the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, which is now well-established to stabilize chiral magnetic domain walls and Skyrmions with the Néel-type configuration,1,2 and the spin Hall effect3,4 that enables their efficient manipulation with electric current.5–8 Collectively, these effects are referred to as spin-orbit torques when used to manipulate magnetic objects although the precise mechanism by which this occurs remains a topic of some controversy.9 Regardless, the emergence of such spin-orbit coupled systems has sparked excitement about their prospect for use in future spintronic applications, which motivates the present work.10 

Here, we measure the interfacial DMI and current-induced domain wall motion (CIDWM) in Co/Ni multi-layers as a function of composition in a Ptx(Ir,Au)1−x alloy buffer layer. Until recently, the impact of 5d heavy metal alloying on spin-orbit coupling phenomena had only been explored theoretically.11 We have previously have shown that alloying a Pt buffer layer with Ir leads to a monotonic reduction of the interfacial DMI vector measured from the asymmetric expansion of magnetic bubble domains.12 That experimental data was fit to a modified dispersive stiffness model,12,13 which gave values for the DMI vector that matched strikingly well with independent measurements performed using Brillouin light scattering (BLS). Having validated the experimental methodology, this work serves to expand the heavy metal composition space for controlling interfacial DMI and directly measure its impact on the efficiency of current-induced domain wall motion.

Magnetic multi-layers were grown by DC magnetron sputtering onto thermally oxidized Si wafers with a working pressure of 2.5 mTorr argon with an additional 0.5 mTorr N2 in the case of insulating TaN deposition. The target diameters were 5″ with a working distance fixed at 4.75″. The film stacks deposited were Substrate/TaN(3)/Pt(3.5)/Ptx(Ir,Au)1−x(1.2)/[Co(0.2)/Ni(0.6)]2/Co(0.2)/Ta(0.8)/TaN(6) with units in nm. The Ptx(Ir,Au)1−x buffer layer was deposited using the alternating wedge growth technique to mimic the cosputtering process as in Ref. 12. MH loops measured using alternating gradient field magnetometry (AGFM) and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) across the composition gradient indicate a saturation magnetization, Ms ∼ 645kA/m, and strong in-plane anisotropy with μ0Hk = 1 − 1.3T. Details on the structural characterization of similar Co/Ni multi-layer films can be found in Ref. 14. The interfacial DMI vector was determined using the bubble domain expansion technique operating in the creep regime.2,12,13,15–17 Selected areas of the sample were damaged using a focused ion beam (FIB) to serve as bubble nucleation sites as in Lau et al.17 Growth velocities in the presence of an in-plane magnetic field were determined from the domain wall displacement following a 1-20msec perpendicular field pulse. The values of DMI were extracted from experimental measurements of velocity vs field using the augmented dispersive stiffness model, which accounts for contributions from a chiral-damping like effect.12 This model has previously shown excellent agreement with independent measurements performed by Brillouin lights scattering (BLS) for the case or PtxIr1−x buffer layers. Measurements of current driven domain wall velocity were performed on nanowires patterned by a combination of photolithography and ion milling. Additional details on nanowire fabrication can be found in Bromberg et al.10 A series of 100ns current pulses were injected through a coplanar waveguide with velocities determined based on the displacement of the wall over a range of current. Current densities were determined from normalizing current by the full metal layer thickness, which does not vary among the samples examined here.

Kerr microscopy images of asymmetric bubble growth in the case of PtxAu1−x is shown in figure 1. As with prior studies on Co/Ni multi-layers we note a marked asymmetry to the curve including a critical field where the velocities of the left and right domain walls cross. This behavior is fit well to the augmented dispersive stiffness model across the spectrum. In the case of both Pt-Ir12 and Pt-Au alloy buffer layers, there is a monotonic decrease in the interfacial DMI vector as the composition deviates from Pt (figure 2). We note that five separate samples with different buffer layers (Ir, PtxIr1−x, Pt, PtxAu1−x, and Au) were compared to produce this data. It is likely that the abrupt change associated with a small amount of Au is explained in part by variation in sample quality rather than an intrinsic impact of Au on DMI. Regardless, the trend seems clear across the composition spectrum that a peak occurs for the case of pure Pt. This result is largely consistent with first principles predictions performed recently by Hanke et al.11 

FIG. 1.

Experimental measurement of domain wall velocity vs. in-plane field and representative Kerr images of domain expansion for a PtxAu1−x buffer layer for a) x = 0 and b) x = 0.875. The center region in each image corresponds to the starting bubble domain while the light grey indicates that bubble after a perpendicular field pulse has been applied.

FIG. 1.

Experimental measurement of domain wall velocity vs. in-plane field and representative Kerr images of domain expansion for a PtxAu1−x buffer layer for a) x = 0 and b) x = 0.875. The center region in each image corresponds to the starting bubble domain while the light grey indicates that bubble after a perpendicular field pulse has been applied.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

DMI vs composition for a PtxIr1−x (see Ref. 12) and PtxAu1−x. The data was obtained from 5 separate samples with different buffer layers as indicated in the legend.

FIG. 2.

DMI vs composition for a PtxIr1−x (see Ref. 12) and PtxAu1−x. The data was obtained from 5 separate samples with different buffer layers as indicated in the legend.

Close modal

Having established a significant dependence of interfacial DMI on buffer layer composition, we now turn to its impact on current-driven domain wall velocities. One intent of the present work is to decouple the impact of the spin Hall angle from that of the interfacial DMI vector. Although the changing buffer layer composition will have some impact on the effective spin Hall angle, we speculate that it will remain largely governed by the 3.5nm Pt seedlayer. Conversely, it has previously been shown that the DMI vector is determined predominantly by the interface and the impact of the Pt seedlayer should be minimal in this regard. Current-driven DW velocity as a function of current density is shown in figure 3 for the case of Ir and Au alloying. Although the threshold velocities are comparable, it is evidence that Au leads to a rapid drop in the efficiency of CIDWM. Combining the results of figures 2 and 3, we show the CIDWM as a function of measured interfacial DMI in figure 4. The blue line is approximately where we expect the DW to transition into a purely Néel-type DW. In early work in this area, it was speculated that the wall chirality could govern the velocity of the wall. It is evident that a direct correlation exists between CIDWM and DMI that extends beyond this value confirming that it is the strength of the DMI rather than the wall chirality that should be considered in determining the efficiency of CIDWM.

FIG. 3.

Domain wall velocity vs current density for the case of PtxIr1−x (top) and PtxAu1−x (bottom). The top inset is a schematic of the device geometry. The bottom inset is an example measurement of DW displacement within the nanowire.

FIG. 3.

Domain wall velocity vs current density for the case of PtxIr1−x (top) and PtxAu1−x (bottom). The top inset is a schematic of the device geometry. The bottom inset is an example measurement of DW displacement within the nanowire.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Measured DW velocity for varying current density vs interfacial DMI for both PtxAu1−x (red) and PtxIr1−x (black). The vertical blue line indicated the approximate transition from mixed DW structure to pure Néel type DWs.

FIG. 4.

Measured DW velocity for varying current density vs interfacial DMI for both PtxAu1−x (red) and PtxIr1−x (black). The vertical blue line indicated the approximate transition from mixed DW structure to pure Néel type DWs.

Close modal

We have shown that the addition of either Ir or Au to a Pt buffer layer in Co/Ni multi-layers decreases the interfacial DMI as measured by asymmetric domain expansion. This result is consistent with first principles predictions of DMI in related systems.11 The measured value of DMI is directly correlated to the current-induced domain wall velocity confirming that increasing DMI beyond the critical value to stabilize Néel DWs continues to improve device performance.

This work is financially supported by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) program on Topological Excitations in Electronics (TEE) under grant number D18AP00011 and also funded (in part) by the Dowd Fellowship from the College of Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. The authors would like to thank Philip and Marsha Dowd for their financial support and encouragement.

1.
A.
Thiaville
,
S.
Rohart
,
E.
Jue
,
V.
Cros
, and
A.
Fert
, “
Dynamics of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls in ultrathin magnetic films
,”
EPL
100
(
2012
).
2.
A.
Hrabec
,
N. A.
Porter
,
A.
Wells
,
M. J.
Benitez
,
G.
Burnell
,
S.
McVitie
,
D.
McGrouther
,
T. A.
Moore
, and
C. H.
Marrows
, “
Measuring and tailoring the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in perpendicularly magnetized thin films
,”
Physical Review B
90
(
2014
).
3.
J. E.
Hirsch
, “
Spin Hall effect
,”
Physical Review Letters
83
,
1834
1837
(
1999
).
4.
A.
Hoffmann
, “
Spin Hall effects in metals
,”
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
49
,
5172
5193
(
2013
).
5.
S.
Woo
,
K.
Litzius
,
B.
Kruger
,
M.-Y.
Im
,
L.
Caretta
,
K.
Richter
,
M.
Mann
,
A.
Krone
,
R. M.
Reeve
,
M.
Weigand
,
P.
Agrawal
,
I.
Lemesh
,
M.-A.
Mawass
,
P.
Fischer
,
M.
Klaui
, and
G. S. D.
Beach
, “
Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets
,”
Nat Mater
15
,
501
506
(
2016
).
6.
K.-S.
Ryu
,
L.
Thomas
,
S.-H.
Yang
, and
S.
Parkin
, “
Chiral spin torque at magnetic domain walls
,”
Nature Nanotechnology
8
,
527
(
2013
).
7.
L.
Liu
,
C.-F.
Pai
,
Y.
Li
,
H.
Tseng
,
D.
Ralph
, and
R.
Buhrman
, “
Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum
,”
Science
336
,
555
558
(
2012
).
8.
S.
Emori
,
U.
Bauer
,
S.-M.
Ahn
,
E.
Martinez
, and
G. S. D.
Beach
, “
Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls
,”
Nature Materials
12
(
2013
).
9.
V.
Amin
and
M.
Stiles
, “
Spin transport at interfaces with spin-orbit coupling: Phenomenology
,”
Physical Review B
94
,
104420
(
2016
).
10.
D.
Bromberg
,
M.
Moneck
,
V.
Sokalski
,
J.
Zhu
,
L.
Pileggi
, and
J.-G.
Zhu
, “
Experimental demonstration of four-terminal magnetic logic device with separate read-and write-paths
,” in
Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2014 IEEE International
(
IEEE
,
2014
), pp.
33–1
.
11.
J.-P.
Hanke
,
F.
Freimuth
,
S.
Blügel
, and
Y.
Mokrousov
, “
Higher-dimensional Wannier interpolation for the modern theory of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction: Application to co-based trilayers
,”
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan
87
,
041010
(
2018
).
12.
D.
Lau
,
J. P.
Pellegren
,
H.
Nembach
,
J.
Shaw
, and
V.
Sokalski
, “
Disentangling factors governing Dzyaloshinskii domain-wall creep in Co/Ni thin films using PtxIr1-x seed layers
,”
Physical Review B
98
,
184410
(
2018
).
13.
J. P.
Pellegren
,
D.
Lau
, and
V.
Sokalski
, “
Dispersive stiffness of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
119
,
027203
(
2017
).
14.
M.
Jaris
,
D.
Lau
,
V.
Sokalski
, and
H.
Schmidt
, “
Magnetization dynamics and damping behavior of Co/Ni multilayers with a graded Ta capping layer
,”
Journal of Applied Physics
121
,
163903
(
2017
).
15.
S.-G.
Je
,
D.-H.
Kim
,
S.-C.
Yoo
,
B.-C.
Min
,
K.-J.
Lee
, and
S.-B.
Choe
, “
Asymmetric magnetic domain-wall motion by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
,”
Physical Review B
88
,
214401
(
2013
).
16.
R.
Lavrijsen
,
D.
Hartmann
,
A.
van den Brink
,
Y.
Yin
,
B.
Barcones
,
R.
Duine
,
M.
Verheijen
,
H.
Swagten
, and
B.
Koopmans
, “
Asymmetric magnetic bubble expansion under in-plane field in Pt/Co/Pt: Effect of interface engineering
,”
Physical Review B
91
,
104414
(
2015
).
17.
D.
Lau
,
V.
Sundar
,
J.-G.
Zhu
, and
V.
Sokalski
, “
Energetic molding of chiral magnetic bubbles
,”
Phys. Rev. B
94
,
060401
(
2016
).