SF6 decomposition component detection is an effective way to diagnose the severity and type of electric discharge. In this study, MoSe2 based material has been chosen as the gas sensing material for the detection of SOF2 and SO2F2, the two characteristic decomposition components of SF6. Based on density functional theory calculations, the adsorption properties of both SOF2 and SO2F2 on intrinsic and Pd doped MoSe2 are studied by analyzing the adsorption structure, charge transfer, density of states, and molecular orbit. The results show that SOF2 and SO2F2 adsorb on intrinsic MoSe2 by physisorption, resulting in weak gas sensitivity. After Pd doping on MoSe2, it dramatically enhances the gas sensitivity of MoSe2 to SOF2 and SO2F2; both the gases interact with Pd-MoSe2 by chemisorption. In addition, SOF2 and SO2F2 show an increase in conductivity during the adsorption process to different extents. The calculation results show that Pd-MoSe2 can be a potential gas sensing material for SOF2 and SO2F2 detection in SF6-insulated equipment.

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is a nontoxic, colorless, odorless, and nonflammable inert gas at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, which possesses strong chemical stability, outstanding insulation, and strong arc extinction properties.1,2 Currently, SF6 has been the most used insulation medium filling in high-voltage insulation equipment, such as gas-insulated switchgear, gas-insulated transmission line, and gas circuit breaker.3–5 However, electric discharge faults inevitably occur in SF6-insulated equipment, including partial discharge, spark discharge, and flashover discharge.6–8 The electric discharge faults accelerate the charged particle to bombard the SF6 molecule, resulting in the decomposition of SF6 gas. Under the combined action of trace moisture and trace oxygen in SF6-insulated equipment, SF6 decomposes to H2S, SO2, SOF2, SO2F2, and other trace gases.9 As the insulation strength of the decomposition components is far less than that of SF6, the discharge process may become more vigorous with time, which may even lead to serious equipment damage or regional blackout.

Therefore, it is urgent to detect the discharge faults in a timely manner and accurately. Currently, the most used detection methods are the ultrahigh frequency (UHF) method, ultrasonic method, optical measurement method, and gas sensing method.10–12 Among them, in common gases detection, the gas sensing method based on specific gas sensors gives high detection sensitivity and less volume, and is of low cost, which makes it an ideal method when used with online monitoring.13 However, SOF2 and SO2F2 are two unusual gases with extremely low concentration (parts per million level), and the sensitivity of current gas sensors is not high enough for practical applications.14 Carbon nanotubes, titanium dioxide, graphene, and molybdenum disulfide have been used to detect SOF2 and SO2F2, which still shows limited gas sensing property to the gases.15 It is necessary to find a new gas sensing material for SOF2 and SO2F2 detection.

Two-dimensional molybdenum selenide (MoSe2) is a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) material, which shows better gas sensing property than traditional metal dioxides.16 Baek et al. reported a highly sensitive MoSe2 based gas sensor for NO2.17 Late et al. reported a MoSe2 monolayer based sensor for NH3 gas sensing applications with sensitivity of parts per million level.18 In addition, transition metal decoration on MoSe2 has been adopted to enhance its gas sensitivity. Choi et al. reported that the gas sensing response of Nb doped MoSe2 to NO2 increased to 8%.19 Zhang et al. reported the gas sensing property of Pd doped MoSe2 to NH3 based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations.20 Cui et al. and Zhang et al. analyzed the doping mechanism of Rh on MoSe2 and its gas sensing property to H2 and C2H2 in transformer oil, and other toxic gases.21,22

Pd is one of the most used transition metals used in surface decoration of nanotubes and two dimensional and three dimensional porous nanomaterials. However, intrinsic MoSe2 and Pd doped MoSe2 (Pd-MoSe2) have not been studied for SOF2 and SO2F2 detection. In this study, the gas sensing property of intrinsic MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 to SOF2 and SO2F2 has been analyzed based on DFT calculations. It is found that Pd doping has dramatically enhanced the gas sensitivity of MoSe2 material. The study results prove that Pd-MoSe2 can be a promising gas sensing material for SOF2 and SO2F2 detection, which provides a key foundation for detecting and diagnosing the discharge fault in SF6-insulated equipment online.

All calculations are performed based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations which has been widely used for analyzing the adsorption properties of small gas molecules on nanomaterial surfaces.23 The generalized gradient approximation/Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (GGA/PBE) functional was adopted to calculate the exchange correlation potential, and the Grimme has been introduced for the van der Waals (vdW) correction.24 The double numerical plus (DNP) polarization basis set and the DFT semicore pseudopotential (DSSP) method have been employed.25 The k point of the Monkhorst–Pack grid was sampled to 7 × 7 × 1.22 The energy tolerance accuracy, the energy gradient, and the atomic offset were set to 5.442 × 10−4 eV, 0.054 eV/Å, and 0.005 Å, respectively. The smearing was set to 0.136 eV to speed up the convergence of the self-consistent field (SCF).

A 4 × 4 × 1 supercell of the MoSe2 slab was built to analyze its surficial adsorption properties, which is consist of 16 Mo atoms and 32 Se atoms.26 In addition, a vacuum slab of 20 Å was set between the periodic MoSe2 slabs, which is large enough to avoid the interaction from the adjacent slabs. The adsorption energy (Eads), charge transfer (QT), and energy gap (Eg) are defined in Eqs. (1)–(3), respectively,27 where Esur/gas, Esur, and Egas are the total energy of the gas adsorbed surface (including SOF2 and SO2F2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2), the energy of the isolated surface (MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2), and the energy of the isolated gases (SOF2 and SO2F2).28–30Qads and Qiso are the net charge of gas molecules after and before gas adsorption. EHOMO and ELUMO are the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbit (HOMO) and the energy of the lowest occupied molecular orbit (LUMO), respectively,

(1)
(2)
(3)

Figure 1 shows the optimized structure of MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 in top views and side views. The MoSe2 slab shown in Figs. 1(a) and 1(d) is a multilayer structure, where Se layers are the outmost surface and Mo atoms are located at the middle layer. Therefore, the gas molecules mainly interact with Se atoms during the adsorption process. The distance between the Se atom and three bonded Mo atoms are 2.543 Å, 2.537 Å, and 2.537 Å. The small difference between these three bonds is caused by the periodic boundary condition. For the Pd-MoSe2 slab shown in Figs. 1(b) and 1(e), the decorated Pd atom bonds with three adjacent Se atoms, which protrudes out of the surface of MoSe2. The bond lengths of these Pd–Se bonds are 2.472 Å, 2.472 Å, and 2.469 Å, which are shorter than those of Mo–Se bonds. The results calculated are in agreement with the results reported by Zhang et al., which exactly verifies the correction of the calculation method used in this study.20 The pyramid structure of the Pd doping structure ensures its structural stability and is also beneficial for gas molecule adsorption as an active site. Figures 1(c) and 1(f) show the structures of SOF2 and SO2F2 molecules, respectively. The bond lengths of O–S and F–S in the SOF2 molecule are 1.461 Å and 1.669 Å, respectively. The lengths of O–S and F–S in the SO2F2 molecule are 1.442 Å and 1.611 Å, respectively.

FIG. 1.

The adsorption structures of MoSe2, Pd-MoSe2, SOF2, and SO2F2. The distance is in Å.

FIG. 1.

The adsorption structures of MoSe2, Pd-MoSe2, SOF2, and SO2F2. The distance is in Å.

Close modal

Figure 2 shows the total density of states (TDOS) and projected density of states (PDOS) of MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2. For TDOS of MoSe2 shown in Fig. 2(a), the TDOS is continuous at the Fermi level, but an obvious interruption exists from 0.3 eV to 1.1 eV, verifying the semiconductor properties of intrinsic MoSe2. For PDOS of MoSe2 shown in Fig. 2(b), it can be found that the chemical bond between the Mo atom and Se atom is mainly due to hybridization between the Mo-p orbit and Se-p orbit as the PDOS is highly coincident at all energy levels. For TDOS of Pd-MoSe2 shown in Fig. 2(c), its distribution tendency is similar to that of MoSe2, and the crests and troughs almost occur at the same energy level. However, the peak value of Pd-MoSe2 is larger than that of MoSe2 due to the metallic properties of the doped Pd atom. For PDOS of the Pd atom and its bonded Mo atom in the Pd-MoSe2 system shown in Fig. 2(d), the PDOS mainly comes from the Pd-d orbit and Mo-p orbit. In addition, the PDOS of the Pd-d orbit and Mo-p orbit distinctly overlap around −4.2 eV and the Fermi level. In general, Pd doping on the MoSe2 surface increases its conductivity, and the protruding Pd atom enhances the adsorption properties of MoSe2 to small gas molecules.

FIG. 2.

The TDOS and PDOS of [(a) and (b)] MoSe2 and [(c) and (d)] Pd-MoSe2. The dashed line represents the Fermi level.

FIG. 2.

The TDOS and PDOS of [(a) and (b)] MoSe2 and [(c) and (d)] Pd-MoSe2. The dashed line represents the Fermi level.

Close modal

As shown in Fig. 3 and Table I, the adsorption structures and the corresponding parameter of the SOF2 molecule on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces are analyzed to understand the gas sensing mechanism. For SOF2 adsorption on MoSe2 shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(c), it shows the most stable adsorption structure by approaching the MoSe2 with the S atom; this is because of the multivalence property of the S atom. The nearest interaction distance from the molecule to MoSe2 reaches a length of 3.258 Å. Due to the long interaction distance, the adsorption Eads and QT are only −0.361 eV and −0.043e, respectively. In addition, the adsorption process does not change drastically the initial structure of MoSe2 and SOF2. Therefore, the adsorption effect of MoSe2 to SOF2 belongs to physisorption. For SOF2 adsorption shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(d), the SOF2 molecule adsorbs on Pd-MoSe2 by the Pd–S bond. The adsorption distance has dramatically decreased to 2.188 Å, which is obviously shorter than that between SOF2 and MoSe2. The adsorption belongs to chemisorption because of the large Eads with a value of −1.238 eV. However, there is still only small charge transfer (−0.042e) between the gas molecule and Pd-MoSe2. By comparing the adsorption properties before and after Pd doping, it can be concluded that Pd doping significantly enhances the adsorption of MoSe2 based material to SOF2, which plays a key foundation for gas sensing.

FIG. 3.

The adsorption structures of SOF2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces. The distance is in Å.

FIG. 3.

The adsorption structures of SOF2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces. The distance is in Å.

Close modal
TABLE I.

The adsorption parameters of SOF2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces.

SystemDistance (Å)QT (e)Eads (eV)
SOF2/MoSe2 3.258 −0.043 −0.361 
SOF2/Pd-MoSe2 2.188 −0.042 −1.238 
SystemDistance (Å)QT (e)Eads (eV)
SOF2/MoSe2 3.258 −0.043 −0.361 
SOF2/Pd-MoSe2 2.188 −0.042 −1.238 

Figure 4 shows the TDOS before and after SOF2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2, respectively. For SOF2 adsorption on MoSe2, it can be seen that the gas adsorption brings no change to the distribution of TDOS because the adsorption between SOF2 and MoSe2 is too weak to change the TDOS during the adsorption process. Therefore, intrinsic MoSe2 shows weak gas sensing property to SOF2. After SOF2 adsorption on Pd-MoSe2, the TDOS obviously increases at most areas below the Fermi level and moves right over the Fermi level. As a result, the probability of charge transfer from the valence band to conduction band increases after SOF2 adsorption, reflecting the increase in conductivity. In summary, Pd doping enhances the gas sensing property of MoSe2 based material to SOF2.

FIG. 4.

The TDOS before and after SOF2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2. The dashed line is the Fermi level.

FIG. 4.

The TDOS before and after SOF2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2. The dashed line is the Fermi level.

Close modal

Similarly, the properties of SO2F2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 were studied to analyze the adsorption mechanism. Figure 5 and Table II present the adsorption structure and the corresponding adsorption parameter. For SO2F2 adsorption on the intrinsic MoSe2 surface as shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(c) in top and side views, the gas molecule is far from the surface with a nearest distance of 3.440 Å between F1 and Mo1 atoms. Due to the long interaction distance, the Eads and QT are only −0.327 eV and −0.020e, respectively. Consequently, the interaction between SO2F2 and MoSe2 should be weak physisorption. After Pd doping on the MoSe2 surface, there is strong chemisorption between SO2F2 and Pd-MoSe2 as shown in Figs. 5(b) and 5(d) in top and side views. The bond between the Pd atom and Mo4 atom broke during the adsorption process, and the F4 atom has dissociated from the SO2F2 molecule and built a new bond with the Pd atom with a distance of 1.959 Å. Besides, the dissociated SOF2 molecule interacts with the Pd atom by the S2-Pd bond with a length of 2.275 Å. Because of the strong interaction, the Eads and QT reach −1.547 eV and −0.700e, respectively. Therefore, the adsorption process is hard to reverse spontaneously.

FIG. 5.

The adsorption structures of SO2F2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces.

FIG. 5.

The adsorption structures of SO2F2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces.

Close modal
TABLE II.

The adsorption parameters of SO2F2 on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2 surfaces.

SystemDistance (Å)QT (e)Eads (eV)
SO2F2/MoSe2 F1-Se1: 3.440 −0.020 −0.327 
O1- Se1: 3.512 
O2-Se1: 3.511 
S1-Se1: 3.537 
SO2F2/Pd-MoSe2 Se2-Pd: 2.639 −0.700 −1.547 
Se3-Pd: 2.447 
F4-Pd: 1.959 
S2-Pd: 2.275 
SystemDistance (Å)QT (e)Eads (eV)
SO2F2/MoSe2 F1-Se1: 3.440 −0.020 −0.327 
O1- Se1: 3.512 
O2-Se1: 3.511 
S1-Se1: 3.537 
SO2F2/Pd-MoSe2 Se2-Pd: 2.639 −0.700 −1.547 
Se3-Pd: 2.447 
F4-Pd: 1.959 
S2-Pd: 2.275 

Figure 6 shows the TDOS before and after SO2F2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2. For SO2F2 adsorption on MoSe2, the change of TDOS only occurs below the energy level of −3.5 eV with a slight increase. The increased electrons at this area are hard to transfer from the valence to conduction band, and the conductivity does not change in the adsorption process. This result can also be provided by the weak adsorption between SO2F2 and MoSe2, as the adsorption energy is too weak to increase the redistribution of the electron cloud. For SO2F2 adsorption on Pd-MoSe2, the TDOS slightly increases from 0.8 eV to 1.3 eV and above 1.9 eV, while it decreases obviously below the Fermi level. Therefore, more electrons can transfer from the valence band to conduction band, resulting in the increase in conductivity after gas molecule adsorption.

FIG. 6.

The TDOS before and after SO2F2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2. The dashed line is the Fermi level.

FIG. 6.

The TDOS before and after SO2F2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2. The dashed line is the Fermi level.

Close modal

Based on molecular orbital theory, the electron property was studied to further analyze the gas sensing mechanism. Figure 7 and Table III show the HOMO and LUMO distribution and their corresponding values. The HOMO and LUMO only distribute around the Mo atom due to its more strong chemical activity compared with the Se atom. There is no energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO, as both of the energy levels are −3.868 eV. After Pd atom doping, the HOMO and LUMO distribute not only on Mo atoms but also on the doped Pd atom and the surrounded Se atoms. The energy level decreases to −3.791 eV and −3.689 eV with an energy gap of 0.102 eV. Although there is a little energy gap, the large increased molecular orbit distribution will lead to the increase in conductivity. The molecular orbit distributions of SOF2 and SO2F2 adsorption on intrinsic MoSe2 are very similar, the HOMO distribution does not change drastically, and a small part of LUMO exists on the gas molecule. The energy gaps are only 0.009 eV and 0.002 eV for SOF2 and SO2F2 adsorption, respectively. Therefore, the small change of molecular orbit does not change the conductivity during the adsorption of gases. Upon SOF2 on Pd-MoSe2, a large area of HOMO mainly exists on the gas molecule, Pd atom, and Se atoms, while the distribution area of LUMO is much smaller. The energy gap has decreased to 0.087 compared with Pd-MoSe2 of 0.102 eV. Upon SO2F2 on Pd-MoSe2, a small part of HOMO locates on the Pd atom and the dissociated gas molecule and a large area of LUMO on the gas adsorption position. The energy gap dramatically increased to 0.552 eV.

FIG. 7.

[(a1) and (a2)] HOMO and LUMO of MoSe2, [(b1) and (b2)] HOMO and LUMO of Pd-MoSe2, [(c1) and (c2)] HOMO and LUMO of SOF2 adsorbed MoSe2, [(d1) and (d2)] HOMO and LUMO of SOF2 adsorbed Pd-MoSe2, [(e1) and (e2)] HOMO and LUMO of SO2F2 adsorbed MoSe2, and [(f1) and (f2)] HOMO and LUMO of SO2F2 adsorbed Pd-MoSe2.

FIG. 7.

[(a1) and (a2)] HOMO and LUMO of MoSe2, [(b1) and (b2)] HOMO and LUMO of Pd-MoSe2, [(c1) and (c2)] HOMO and LUMO of SOF2 adsorbed MoSe2, [(d1) and (d2)] HOMO and LUMO of SOF2 adsorbed Pd-MoSe2, [(e1) and (e2)] HOMO and LUMO of SO2F2 adsorbed MoSe2, and [(f1) and (f2)] HOMO and LUMO of SO2F2 adsorbed Pd-MoSe2.

Close modal
TABLE III.

HOMO, LUMO, and Eg before and SOF2 and SO2F2 adsorption on MoSe2 and Pd-MoSe2.

SystemHOMO (eV)LUMO (eV)Eg (eV)
MoSe2 −3.868 −3.868 
Pd-MoSe2 −3.791 −3.689 0.102 
SOF2/MoSe2 −3.933 −3.924 0.009 
SOF2/Pd-MoSe2 −3.954 −3.867 0.087 
SO2F2/MoSe2 −3.857 −3.855 0.002 
SO2F2/Pd-MoSe2 −4.874 −4.322 0.552 
SystemHOMO (eV)LUMO (eV)Eg (eV)
MoSe2 −3.868 −3.868 
Pd-MoSe2 −3.791 −3.689 0.102 
SOF2/MoSe2 −3.933 −3.924 0.009 
SOF2/Pd-MoSe2 −3.954 −3.867 0.087 
SO2F2/MoSe2 −3.857 −3.855 0.002 
SO2F2/Pd-MoSe2 −4.874 −4.322 0.552 

SOF2 and SO2F2 are two characteristic decomposition components of SF6 under electric discharge. This study focuses on developing a new gas sensing material for detecting these two types of gases. Intrinsic MoSe2 and Pd doped MoSe2 were adopted as the gas sensing material to explore their gas adsorption properties to SOF2 and SO2F2. In order to analyze the adsorption mechanism, the adsorption structure, adsorption energy, charge transfer, density of states, and molecular orbit were calculated. It is found that intrinsic MoSe2 shows weak adsorption property to SO2F2 and SO2F2, signifying that it shows weak gas sensing property to these gas molecules. Pd doping on the MoSe2 surface significantly increases its adsorption property, and the adsorption energy for SOF2 and SO2F2 reach −1.238 eV and −1.547 eV, respectively. SOF2 and SO2F2 adsorption increases the conductivity of the adsorption system to different extents during the adsorption process. Due to the different variation of conductivity, it can be used to diagnose the severity and type of electric discharge. This study provides important theoretical support for developing an ideal SOF2 and SO2F2, which is critical for online monitoring the running status of SF6-insulated equipment.

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB0902701).

1.
J.
Tang
,
F.
Liu
,
X.
Zhang
,
Q.
Meng
, and
J.
Zhou
, “
Partial discharge recognition through an analysis of SF6 decomposition products. Part 1: Decomposition characteristics of SF6 under four different partial discharges
,”
IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul.
19
,
29
36
(
2012
).
2.
H.
You
,
Q.
Zhang
,
C.
Guo
,
P.
Xu
,
J.
Ma
,
Y.
Qin
,
T.
Wen
, and
Y.
Li
, “
Motion and discharge characteristics of metal particles existing in GIS under DC voltage
,”
IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul.
24
,
876
885
(
2017
).
3.
W.
Zhicheng
,
Q.
Zhang
,
M.
Jingtan
,
D.
Qiandong
,
Z.
Lingli
,
L.
Xiaoang
,
G.
Chao
, and
W.
Guoli
, “
Discharge performance of conductor spikes in GIS under AC voltage
,” in
2017 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC)
(
IEEE
,
2017
), pp.
66
69
.
4.
T.
Magier
,
M.
Tenzer
, and
H.
Koch
, “
Direct current gas-insulated transmission lines
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
33
,
440
446
(
2018
).
5.
E. A. L.
Vianna
,
A. R.
Abaide
,
L. N.
Canha
, and
V.
Miranda
, “
Substations SF6 circuit breakers: Reliability evaluation based on equipment condition
,”
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
142
,
36
46
(
2017
).
6.
J.
Tang
,
X.
Rao
,
B.
Tang
,
X.
Liu
,
X.
Gong
,
F.
Zeng
, and
Q.
Yao
, “
Investigation on SF6 spark decomposition characteristics under different pressures
,”
IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul.
24
,
2066
2075
(
2017
).
7.
J.
Tang
,
X.
Yang
,
G.
Ye
,
Q.
Yao
,
Y.
Miao
, and
F.
Zeng
, “
Decomposition characteristics of SF6 and partial discharge recognition under negative DC conditions
,”
Energies
10
,
556
(
2017
).
8.
H.
Wen
,
X.
Zhang
,
R.
Xia
,
G.
Hu
, and
Y.
Wu
, “
Decomposition characteristics of SF6 under flashover discharge on the epoxy resin surface
,”
Materials
12
,
1408
(
2019
).
9.
Y.
Fu
,
X.
Wang
,
Q.
Gao
,
M.
Rong
,
X.
Li
,
A.
Yang
,
D.
Liu
,
Y.
Li
, and
C.
Wang
, “
Calculation on the composition varying characteristics of decaying SF6 arc in the presence of trace oxygen and moisture
,” in
2017 4th International Conference on Electric Power Equipment-Switching Technology (ICEPE-ST)
(
IEEE
,
2017
), pp.
656
659
.
10.
J.
Li
,
X.
Han
,
Z.
Liu
, and
X.
Yao
, “
A novel GIS partial discharge detection sensor with integrated optical and UHF methods
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Delivery
33
,
2047
2049
(
2018
).
11.
G.-m.
Ma
,
H.-y.
Zhou
,
M.
Zhang
,
C.-r.
Li
,
B.-y.
Cui
, and
Y.-y.
Wu
, “
Optical fiber acoustic emission sensor for GIS partial discharge detection
,” in
Optical Sensors and Sensing Congress (ES, FTS, HISE, Sensors)
(
Optical Society of America
,
San Jose, California
,
2019
), p.
STh3A.5
.
12.
X.
Zhang
,
H.
Cui
, and
Y.
Gui
, “
Synthesis of graphene-based sensors and application on detecting SF6 decomposing products: A review
,”
Sensors
17
,
363
(
2017
).
13.
X.
Zhou
,
S.
Lee
,
Z.
Xu
, and
J.
Yoon
, “
Recent progress on the development of chemosensors for gases
,”
Chem. Rev.
115
,
7944
8000
(
2015
).
14.
D.
Chen
,
X.
Zhang
,
J.
Tang
,
Z.
Cui
, and
H.
Cui
, “
Pristine and Cu decorated hexagonal InN monolayer, a promising candidate to detect and scavenge SF6 decompositions based on first-principle study
,”
J. Hazard. Mater.
363
,
346
357
(
2019
).
15.
H.
Cui
,
T.
Liu
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Ru-InN monolayer as a gas scavenger to guard the operation status of SF6 insulation devices: A first-principles theory
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
19
,
5249
5255
(
2019
).
16.
H.
Cui
,
D.
Chen
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Dissolved gas analysis in transformer oil using Pd catalyst decorated MoSe2 monolayer: A first-principles theory
,”
Sustainable Mater. Technol.
20
,
e00094
(
2019
).
17.
J.
Baek
,
D.
Yin
,
N.
Liu
,
I.
Omkaram
,
C.
Jung
,
H.
Im
,
S.
Hong
,
S. M.
Kim
,
Y. K.
Hong
,
J.
Hur
,
Y.
Yoon
, and
S.
Kim
, “
A highly sensitive chemical gas detecting transistor based on highly crystalline CVD-grown MoSe2 films
,”
Nano Res.
10
,
1861
1871
(
2017
).
18.
D. J.
Late
,
T.
Doneux
, and
M.
Bougouma
, “
Single-layer MoSe2 based NH3 gas sensor
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
105
,
233103
(
2014
).
19.
S. Y.
Choi
,
Y.
Kim
,
H.-S.
Chung
,
A. R.
Kim
,
J.-D.
Kwon
,
J.
Park
,
Y. L.
Kim
,
S.-H.
Kwon
,
M. G.
Hahm
, and
B.
Cho
, “
Effect of Nb doping on chemical sensing performance of two-dimensional layered MoSe2
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
,
3817
3823
(
2017
).
20.
D.
Zhang
,
Q.
Li
,
P.
Li
,
M.
Pang
, and
Y.
Luo
, “
Fabrication of Pd-decorated MoSe2 nanoflowers and density functional theory simulation toward ammonia sensing
,”
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
40
,
616
619
(
2019
).
21.
H.
Cui
,
G.
Zhang
,
X.
Zhang
, and
J.
Tang
, “
Rh-doped MoSe2 as a toxic gas scavenger: A first-principles study
,”
Nanoscale Adv.
1
,
772
(
2019
).
22.
Y.
Zhang
,
X.
Sun
,
S.
Tan
,
T.
Liu
, and
H.
Cui
, “
Adsorption characteristic of Rh-doped MoSe2 monolayer towards H2 and C2H2 for DGA in transformer oil based on DFT method
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
487
,
930
937
(
2019
).
23.
Y.
Gui
,
C.
Tang
,
Q.
Zhou
,
L.
Xu
,
Z.
Zhao
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
The sensing mechanism of N-doped SWCNTs toward SF6 decomposition products: A first-principle study
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
440
,
846
852
(
2018
).
24.
Y.
Wang
,
Y.
Gui
,
C.
Ji
,
C.
Tang
,
Q.
Zhou
,
J.
Li
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Adsorption of SF6 decomposition components on Pt3-TiO2(1 0 1) surface: A DFT study
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
459
,
242
248
(
2018
).
25.
D.
Liu
,
Y.
Gui
,
C.
Ji
,
C.
Tang
,
Q.
Zhou
,
J.
Li
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Adsorption of SF6 decomposition components over Pd (1 1 1): A density functional theory study
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
465
,
172
179
(
2019
).
26.
H.
Wei
,
Y.
Gui
,
J.
Kang
,
W.
Wang
, and
C.
Tang
, “
A DFT study on the adsorption of H2S and SO2 on Ni doped MoS2 monolayer
,”
Nanomaterials
8
,
646
(
2018
).
27.
J.
Li
,
Y.
Gui
,
C.
Ji
,
C.
Tang
,
Q.
Zhou
,
Y.
Wang
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Theoretical study of the adsorption of SF6 decomposition components on Ni(1 1 1) surface
,”
Comput. Mater. Sci.
152
,
248
255
(
2018
).
28.
C.
Tang
,
S.
Zhang
,
X.
Wang
, and
J.
Hao
, “
Enhanced mechanical properties and thermal stability of cellulose insulation paper achieved by doping with melamine-grafted nano-SiO2
,”
Cellulose
25
,
3619
3633
(
2018
).
29.
C.
Tang
,
X.
Li
,
Z.
Li
,
W.
Tian
, and
Q.
Zhou
, “
Molecular simulation on the thermal stability of meta-aramid insulation paper fiber at transformer operating temperature
,”
Polymers
10
,
1348
(
2018
).
30.
Y.
Tang
,
C.
Tang
,
D.
Hu
, and
Y.
Gui
, “
Effect of aminosilane coupling agents with different chain lengths on thermo-mechanical properties of cross-linked epoxy resin
,”
Nanomaterials
8
,
951
(
2018
).