Planar magnesium diboride Josephson junctions are fabricated using focused helium ion beam irradiation. A single track of ion irradiation with a 30 kV He+ beam with nominal beam diameter < 0.5 nm is used to create a normal-metal barrier on a MgB2 film deposited by hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition. Josephson coupling is observed below the critical temperature of the electrodes for a He+ doses between 8x1015/cm2 to 4x1016/cm2. Analysis of the temperature dependence of the normal resistance and critical voltage of the junctions shows highly uniform barriers with nearly ideal resistively-shunted junction behavior for higher-dose junctions, while nonequilibrium effects dominate the properties of lower-dose junctions over most of the temperature range. These results demonstrate that focused helium ion beam irradiation can produce high-quality proximity-coupled MgB2 Josephson junctions with tailorable properties, promising for use in superconducting devices and circuits.

Josephson junctions are crucial elements in a wide range of superconducting devices and circuits.1 The demand for higher clock speeds in digital circuits has driven impressive advances, in particular in the rapid single flux quantum (RSFQ) technology. RSFQ requires a junction fabrication process that reliably produces circuits with many Josephson junctions and a minimal spread in junction parameters such as critical current density and normal resistance.2 Niobium has been the material of choice for the majority of junction applications for decades, and the fabrication process for high quality Nb/AlOx/Nb trilayer junctions is well established.3,4 Other superconducting materials with appealing properties for Josephson junctions have also been investigated. Magnesium diboride (MgB2), whose superconducting properties were discovered in 2001,5 has properties attractive for use in superconducting digital devices. It has a high critical temperature (Tc) of 40 K, the highest among all conventional superconductors. Nb, with a Tc of approximately 9 K, has a practical device operating temperature of 4-5 K, requiring expensive cryogenic cooling with large power consumption. On the other hand, MgB2 junctions have been shown to operate at as high as 20 K which significantly reduces cooling costs.6,7 MgB2 has two energy gaps (Δπ∼ 2.2 meV and Δσ ∼ 7 meV) both of which are larger than that of Nb (Δ ∼ 1.5 meV). This is important for the RSFQ technology as the maximum operating frequency increases with the gap energy. MBE-grown MgB2/MgO/MgB2 trilayer junctions have demonstrated Josephson junctions with excellent properties8,9 but no information on parameter spreads and reproducibility was given. Similar MgB2/MgO/MgB2 trilayer junctions grown by hybrid physical-chemical vapor deposition (HPCVD) have also been reported, but the on-chip spread in critical current density (54%) is too high for practical applications.10 This could be caused by the growth of the top electrode at high temperature that may degrade the junction barrier. This problem may be alleviated by adopting a planar MgB2 Josephson junction technology that requires growth of only a single layer of MgB2.

High energy ion irradiation using neon, oxygen, and other heavy ions (atomic number Z ≥ 18) at energies >100 keV have been used to produce ion-damaged Josephson junctions in high temperature superconductor YBCO11,12 and MgB2 films.13–15 A superconductor film is irradiated through an opening in a mask fabricated by electron-beam lithography, typically ∼10 nm, which defines the barrier thickness in a planar geometry. The barrier thickness thus produced is several times larger than the in-plane coherence length of ∼ 4–6 nm in MgB216 and 2-3 nm in YBCO,17 severely limiting the values for IcRn. Decreasing the barrier thickness can increase IcRn through the exponential dependence of Ic on thickness. This has led to the use of focused ion beams to restrict the damaged region. For a given substrate and beam diameter, impinging ions with larger atomic number will have larger lateral straggle due to more frequent large-angle scattering events from collisions, resulting in a wider lateral damage region. This suggests the narrowest damaged region will be obtained with low atomic number ion beams such as He+ available in a commercial Helium Ion Microscope (HIM). The use of a He+ beam to produce Josephson junctions in YBCO has recently been demonstrated.12 In this paper, we report the properties of high-quality MgB2 superconductor-normal-superconductor planar junctions with highly uniform barriers made by focused helium ion beam irradiation. 30 nm-thick MgB2 films are grown on a SiC(0001) substrate by HPCVD; the details of the deposition process have been reported previously.18 The films are subsequently coated with a bilayer of Cr/Au (5 nm/20 nm) by DC magnetron sputtering to protect the MgB2 during processing. Standard UV lithography and Ar ion milling are used to pattern an MgB2 bridge with widths ranging from 2–5 μm. Subsequently, a 300 nm-thick Au film is sputter-coated on the contact pads and the Cr/Au on top of the bridge is removed by Ar ion milling. The sample is then passivated with an 8 nm-thick RF-magnetron sputtered SiO2 layer.

A Zeiss Orion Plus helium ion microscope is used for irradiation. A single line exposure at room temperature with a 30 kV He+ beam (nominal beam diameter < 0.5 nm, pitch = 2 nm) was chosen to form planar SNS Josephson junctions. The range of the 30 kV He+ ions in the MgB2/SiC structure from computer simulations using the TRIM software19 shown in Fig. 1(a) is greater than ∼ 150 nm, approximately 4 times the film thickness (30+8 nm). This ensures a minimal lateral straggle of the ions traveling through the MgB2 film and therefore a more uniform localized damage in the barrier region is obtained. Figure 1(b) shows a diagram of the bridge with the irradiated region indicated in red. The dependence of Tc and normal state resistivity on the He+ ion dose have been studied previously on large areas for doses between 1013 – 1018/cm2,20 revealing a critical dose of ∼8 x 1015/cm2 for a complete Tc suppression. This dose was taken as the lower limit for the single-track irradiations to produce a barrier for Josephson coupling across the damaged region. Figure 2 shows results for two planar MgB2 Josephson junctions created with a high dose of 2×1016/cm2 and a low dose of 9×1015/cm2, respectively. Figure 2(a) and (b) show their I–V curves at different temperatures. The Josephson effect is observed in both cases, whereas the critical current density was lower for the high-dose junction (∼1×106A/cm2 at 4 K) than that of the low-dose junction (∼107A/cm2 at 4 K). The extremely high Jc of the low-dose junction at low temperature is indicative of a high transparency barrier, as described in the Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwick model.21 

FIG. 1.

(a) TRIM simulation showing irradiation of 30 keV He+ ions in our film/substrate geometry. Layers (from left to right): 8 nm SiO2 passivation layer on 30 nm MgB2 film on SiC substrate. The deduced He+ range >150 nm insures that most of the He+ ions stop well into the SiC substrate. (b) Schematic of He+ beam creating the Josephson junction on a MgB2 film. SiO2 layer is not depicted. (c) SEM image of 4x10 μm2 bridge. The Helium beam was scanned along the red line.

FIG. 1.

(a) TRIM simulation showing irradiation of 30 keV He+ ions in our film/substrate geometry. Layers (from left to right): 8 nm SiO2 passivation layer on 30 nm MgB2 film on SiC substrate. The deduced He+ range >150 nm insures that most of the He+ ions stop well into the SiC substrate. (b) Schematic of He+ beam creating the Josephson junction on a MgB2 film. SiO2 layer is not depicted. (c) SEM image of 4x10 μm2 bridge. The Helium beam was scanned along the red line.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

Magnetotransport measurements for SNS Josephson junctions (JJs) fabricated with high dose (2×1016/cm2, top row) and low dose (9×1015/cm2, bottom row). Current-voltage characteristics at different temperatures for (a) high-dose and (b) low-dose JJs. Shapiro steps for (c) high-dose JJ at T = 12 K, and (d) low-dose JJ at T = 26 K. Microwaves are applied with a frequency of f = 14.9 GHz, and height dependence of the zeroth (= Ic), 1st, 2nd and 3rd Shapiro steps on applied microwave power are shown (e) for the high-dose JJ at T = 12 K, and (f) for the low-dose JJ at T = 26 K. Modulation of the critical current as a function of magnetic field at different temperatures are shown in (g) for the high-dose JJ, and (h) for the low-dose JJ.

FIG. 2.

Magnetotransport measurements for SNS Josephson junctions (JJs) fabricated with high dose (2×1016/cm2, top row) and low dose (9×1015/cm2, bottom row). Current-voltage characteristics at different temperatures for (a) high-dose and (b) low-dose JJs. Shapiro steps for (c) high-dose JJ at T = 12 K, and (d) low-dose JJ at T = 26 K. Microwaves are applied with a frequency of f = 14.9 GHz, and height dependence of the zeroth (= Ic), 1st, 2nd and 3rd Shapiro steps on applied microwave power are shown (e) for the high-dose JJ at T = 12 K, and (f) for the low-dose JJ at T = 26 K. Modulation of the critical current as a function of magnetic field at different temperatures are shown in (g) for the high-dose JJ, and (h) for the low-dose JJ.

Close modal

The I–V curves of the high-dose junction can be fit well by the resistively-shunted junction (RSJ) model for a short junction (w < 4λJ, where λJ=Φ0/2πμ0dJc is the Josephson penetration depth, Φ0 is the magnetic flux quantum, d=d+2λ and w is the bridge width) for most temperatures measured, as discussed below. The results are free of hysteresis down to 2.8 K. The low-dose junction displays long-junction behavior (w > 4λJ) for T < 24 K and the I–V curve becomes hysteretic below 8 K. The I-V curves of planar Josephson junctions are known to deviate from the RSJ model in the long-junction regime due to nonuniform current distribution across the junction,22 consistent with the behavior seen here. Both junctions were exposed to RF radiation at 14.9 GHz in the short-junction regime, i.e. at sufficiently high temperatures. Figures 2(c) and 2(d) show the IV curves with and without RF radiation at 12 K and 26 K for the high-dose and low-dose junctions, respectively. Shapiro steps are seen in both samples with current steps at voltages cooresponding to nhf/2e, where n is an integer and f is the frequency of the RF radiation. The Shapiro step height as a function of the RF power is shown for different orders for the high-dose junction in Fig 2(e) and low-dose junction in Fig 2(f). Oscillations expected for the RF Josephson effect was observed in both cases. For the high-dose junction, the steps are seen at all temperatures below Tc, while for the low-dose junction the steps disappear below 8 K, coinciding with the onset of hysteresis in the IV curve.

Figure 2(g) and (h) show the magnetic field dependence of the junction critical current for the high-dose and the low-dose junctions, respectively. The high-dose junction shows a nearly-ideal Fraunhofer modulation of the critical current with field, however even at the highest measured temperature (14 K) at which the junction should be in the short–junction limit by both criteria (w < 4λJ and close fit of the IV curve to the RSJ model, as mentioned above) the lack of complete suppression of critical current and the small deviation from the expected sin(x)/x shape suggests the barrier is not perfectly uniform. At the lowest temperatures (4–6 K) the pattern evolves toward the characteristic long-junction behavior seen in the lower-dose junction below ∼24 K, where a linear Ic-vs-field dependence of the primary lobe is seen. This linear dependence is well understood and is due to nucleation of vortices at the junction edge and subsequent flux-flow motion instead of field penetration across the entire junction width as occurs in short junctions.23 From the critical current density of the junctions and the estimated distance between the two electrodes, λJ given above can be calculated for the two junctions using the penetration depth of MgB2.5 The resulting λJ for the low-dose junction varies from 190 nm at 12 K to 450 nm at 26 K and, for the high-dose junction, from 450 nm at 3 K to 1.1 μm at 12 K. Compared to the junction length of 4 μm, this would place the low-dose junction in the long junction regime for the entire temperature range measured (and the high-dose junction in the long junction regime below ∼12 K), in contradiction with the above-mentioned short-junction RSJ behavior of the low-dose junction seen at 26 K. This contradiction can be explained by considering flux–focusing effects that occur when applying perpendicular magnetic field to a planar thin film.24 Due to the Meissner effect, the electrodes at both ends of the junction barrier push the magnetic field lines into the junction barrier area and therefore the penetration depth of the superconductor thin film calculated by the first Ic minimum (ΔB in the Fraunhofer pattern) is larger than that of the bulk value. Based on the analysis of Rosenthal et al. for film thickness smaller than the magnetic penetration depth, the period of modulation in the Fraunhofer pattern is decreased and scales inversely with the square of the junction width.25 ΔB for a 4-μm junction is predicted to be 2.3 G. As seen in Fig. 2(g) and (h), the first Ic minimum occurs at 2.2 G for the high-dose junction (at 14 K) and 1.7 G for the low-dose junction (at 24 K), in good agreement with the prediction. Introducing a flux-focusing factor C into the sinc dependence, sin(Cx)/x with x = πΦ/Φ0 and Φ is the applied flux, and fitting the Fraunhofer pattern of the high-dose junction at 14 K, yields a value of C = 32, corresponding to an effective junction area of 12.8 μm2 compared to the actual area of 0.4 μm2.

Further information about the barrier properties produced by He+ irradiation can be obtained by analyzing the temperature dependence of the junction normal resistance Rn, critical current Ic, and critical voltage IcRn for both junctions (Figure 3). Both Ic and Rn were taken from fits of the I–V curves to the RSJ model (with and without excess current, see below). The temperature independence of Rn indicates that the irradiated barrier is fully normal down to 2.8 K for both low- and high-dose junctions and its resistance increases with dose. Taking the normal resistance at 10 K from the large-area irradiation data20 and using the resistivity equation R = ρL/A, we can estimate the barrier length as <10 nm for both junctions. This is somewhat larger than expected for the sub-nm He+ beam used and the lateral straggle taken from the TRIM simulations, and can be considered an upper limit. The critical current increases with decreasing temperature for both junctions. According to Likharev’s theory for proximity-coupled junctions,26 for a normal barrier in the dirty limit the temperature variation of the IcRn product follows the expression:

IcRn1t4Ltξn(Tc)exp[Ltξn(Tc)]

Here t = T/Tc is the reduced temperature, L is the barrier length (the electrode separation, referred to earlier as the barrier thickness), and ξn(Tc) is the coherence length of the normal metal at the electrode Tc (39 K). (In the clean limit, t should be replaced by t in this expression.) Fits of IcRn versus temperature (Fig. 3) yield values of L/ξn(Tc) ≈ 6.2 for the high-dose and 4.8 for the low-dose junction. This permits an estimate of ξn(Tc) ≈ 1.6 nm for the high-dose and ≈ 2 nm for the low-dose junction. Fitting IcRn with the above expression in the clean limit gives similar values.

FIG. 3.

Temperature dependence of the junction normal resistance (black squares), critical current (blue circles) and critical voltage (red diamonds) for both low- and high-dose junctions. Fits of the IcRn to the proximity–coupled expression in the dirty limit described in the text is shown in dashed lines.

FIG. 3.

Temperature dependence of the junction normal resistance (black squares), critical current (blue circles) and critical voltage (red diamonds) for both low- and high-dose junctions. Fits of the IcRn to the proximity–coupled expression in the dirty limit described in the text is shown in dashed lines.

Close modal

At high enough critical current (<15 K for high-dose and <25 K for low-dose) both junctions show an “excess” critical current, i.e. a nonzero intercept when extrapolating the ohmic portion of the I-V curve (at voltages greater than ∼5IcRn). This excess critical current is important for practical operation since it is not completely modulated under applied magnetic field and thus can impact device performance; excess currents can also reveal more fundamental information about nonequilibrium transport in the junction that alters the current-phase relationship. Theoretical treatment of nonequilibrium effects in proximity-coupled Josephson junctions is based on the time-dependent Usadel equations26 at high Jc (i.e. low temperature) in which nonequilibrium conditions lead to both excess current, that saturates at ∼ 75% of Ic (in qualitative agreement with the data in Fig. 3 for both junctions at low temperatures), and eventually hysteresis, as seen in the low-dose junction. Strong nonequilibrium effects are expected for high-transparency normal barriers. Excess current and hysteresis can also result from heating (the “hot spot” model27) but these have a power dependence that cannot explain the data in Fig. 3.

In summary, we have fabricated high quality planar MgB2 SNS Josephson junctions using He+ focused ion beam damage to create a normal metal barrier. The two doses studied here, 9x1015/cm2 and 2x1016/cm2, both show Josephson coupling characteristic of a highly uniform barrier. While the high-dose junction exhibits both AC and DC Josephson effects for all the temperatures measured, the AC Josephson effect disappears below 8 K for the lower dose junction, the onset temperature of hysteresis in the I-V curve. The magnetic-field dependence of junction Ic indicates flux focusing effects in the planar thin film limit are important. The high-dose junction shows nearly ideal RSJ behavior in the temperature window between 15 and 25 K, while the high-transparency barrier in the low-dose junction leads to transport properties dominated by nonequilibrium effects over most of the measured temperature range. These results show that the junction properties such as Rn, Ic and IcRn at a desired temperature can be tailored by dose over a range that is useful in a wide variety of superconducting electronic applications. Since writing times are of order milliseconds at these doses in micron-wide bridges, our results suggest that the He+ ion damage technique may be useful to prototype e.g. RSFQ circuits requiring hundreds or thousands of junctions with narrow parameter spreads in MgB2 films operating at or above 20 K.

This work was supported by NSF grant DMR–1310087. L. K. and T. M. acknowledge the Temple Materials Institute for use of their facilities. The scanning electron imaging was performed at Temple in the CoE-NIC facility funded by DoD DURIP Award N0014-12-1-0777 from the ONR and sponsored by the College of Engineering, Temple University.

1.
J. Q.
You
and
F.
Nori
, “
Superconducting circuits and quantum information
,”
Phys. Today
58
,
42
(
2005
).
2.
K. K.
Likharev
and
V. K.
Semenov
, “
RSFQ logic/memory family: A new Josephson-junction technology for sub-terahertz-clock-frequency digital systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
1
,
3
(
1991
).
3.
C.
Kaiser
,
High quality Nb/Al-AlOx/Nb Josephson Junctions: Technological Development and Macroscopic Quantum Experiments
, (Vol. 4,
KIT Scientific Publishing
,
2011
).
4.
M.
Bhushan
and
E. M.
Macedo
, “
Nb/AlOx/Nb trilayer process for the fabrication of submicron Josephson junctions and low-noise dc SQUIDs
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
58
,
1323
(
1991
).
5.
J.
Nagamatsu
,
N.
Nakagawa
,
T.
Muranaka
,
Y.
Zenitani
, and
J.
Akimitsu
, “
Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride
,”
Nature
410
,
63
(
2001
).
6.
D.
Cunnane
,
C.
Zhuang
,
K.
Chen
,
X. X.
Xi
,
J.
Yong
, and
T. R.
Lemberger
, “
Penetration depth of MgB2 measured using Josephson junctions and SQUIDs
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
,
072603
(
2013
).
7.
D.
Cunnane
,
K.
Chen
, and
X. X.
Xi
, “
Superconducting MgB2 rapid single flux quantum toggle flip flop circuit
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
,
222601
(
2013
).
8.
L.
Li
,
H.
Zhang
,
Y.-H.
Yang
, and
G.-X.
Miao
, “
High-quality epitaxial MgB2 Josephson junctions grown by molecular beam epitaxy
,”
Adv. Eng. Mater.
19
,
160792
(
2017
).
9.
K.
Ueda
,
S.
Saito
,
K.
Semba
, and
T.
Makimoto
, “
All MgB2 Josephson tunnel junctions
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
86
,
172502
(
2005
).
10.
T.
Melbourne
,
D.
Cunnane
,
E.
Galan
,
X. X.
Xi
, and
K.
Chen
, “
Study of MgB2 Josephson junction arrays and sub-μm junctions
,”
IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
25
,
1
(
2015
).
11.
K.
Chen
,
S. A.
Cybart
, and
R. C.
Dynes
, “
Planar thin film YBa2Cu3O7−δ Josephson junction pairs and arrays via nanolithography and ion damage
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
85
,
2863
(
2004
).
12.
S. A.
Cybart
,
E. Y.
Cho
,
T. J.
Wong
,
B. H.
Wehlin
,
M. K.
Ma
,
C.
Huynh
, and
R. C.
Dynes
, “
Nano Josephson superconducting tunnel junctions in YBa2Cu3O7−δ directly patterned with a focused helium ion beam
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
10
,
598
(
2015
).
13.
K.
Chen
,
Y.
Cui
,
Q.
Li
, and
X. X.
Xi
, “
Study of Planar MgB2/TiB2/MgB2 Josephson junctions using the proximity effect SNS model
,”
IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
17
,
955
(
2007
).
14.
D. A.
Kahler
,
J.
Talvacchio
,
J. M.
Murduck
,
A.
Kirschenbaum
,
R. E.
Brooks
,
S. B.
Bu
,
J.
Choi
,
D. M.
Kim
, and
C. B.
Eom
, “
Planar Josephson junctions fabricated with magnesium diboride films
,”
IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
13
,
1063
(
2003
).
15.
G.
Burnell
,
D. J.
Kang
,
H. N.
Lee
,
S. H.
Moon
,
B.
Oh
, and
M. G.
Blamire
, “
Planar superconductor-normal-superconductor Josephson junctions in MgB2
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
79
,
3464
(
2001
).
16.
M. H.
Jung
,
M.
Jaime
,
A. H.
Lacerda
,
G. S.
Boebinger
,
W. N.
Kang
,
H. J.
Kim
,
E. M.
Choi
, and
S. I.
Lee
, “
Anisotropic superconductivity in epitaxial MgB2 films
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
343
,
447
(
2001
);
M.
Xu
,
H.
Kitazawa
,
Y.
Takano
,
J.
Ye
,
K.
Nishida
,
H.
Abe
,
A.
Matsushita
,
N.
Tsujii
, and
G.
Kido
, “
Anisotropy of superconductivity from MgB2 single crystals
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
79
,
2779
(
2001
).
17.
S. K.
Malik
, and
S. S.
Shah
, eds.,
Physical and material properties of high temperature superconductors
, (
Nova Publishers
,
1994
).
18.
X. X.
Xi
, “
MgB2 thin films
,”
Superconductor Science and Technology
22
,
043001
(
2009
).
19.
J. F.
Ziegler
,
M. D.
Ziegler
, and
J. P.
Biersack
,
SRIM: the stopping and range of ions in matter
(
Cadence Design Systems
,
2008
).
20.
L.
Kasaei
,
M.
Demir
,
N.
Acharya
,
P.
Bhattarai
,
V.
Manichev
,
L. C.
Feldman
,
T.
Gustafsson
,
Y.
Collantes
,
E.
Hellstrom
,
K.
Chen
,
X. X.
Xi
, and
B. A.
Davidson
, in preparation.
21.
G. E.
Blonder
,
M.
Tinkham
, and
T. M.
Klapwijk
, “
Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion
,”
Phys. Rev. B
25
,
4515
(
1982
).
22.
M. S.
Rzchowski
and
B. A.
Davidson
, “
Supercurrent peaks in planar high-temperature superconducting Josephson junctions
,”
Phys. Rev. B
62
,
12455
(
2000
).
23.
A.
Barone
and
G.
Paterno
,
Physics and applications of the Josephson effect
(Vol. 1,
New York
:
Wiley
,
1982
).
24.
A. I.
Gubin
,
K. S.
Il’in
,
S. A.
Vitusevich
,
M.
Siegel
, and
N.
Klein
, “
Dependence of magnetic penetration depth on the thickness of superconducting Nb thin films
,”
Phys. Rev. B
72
,
064503
(
2005
).
25.
P. A.
Rosenthal
,
M. R.
Beasley
,
K.
Char
,
M. S.
Colclough
, and
G.
Zaharchuk
, “
Flux focusing effects in planar thin-film grain-boundary Josephson junctions
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
59
,
3482
(
1991
).
26.
K. K.
Likharev
, “
Superconducting weak links
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
51
,
101
(
1979
).
27.
W. J.
Skocpol
,
M. R.
Beasley
, and
M.
Tinkham
, “
Self-heating hotspots in superconducting thin-film microbridges
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
45
,
4054
(
1974
).