Magnetic and microstructural properties of 111 textured Cu/N×[Co/Ni] films are studied as a function of the number of bilayer repeats N and annealing temperature. M(H) loop measurements show that coercivity, Hc, increases with annealing temperature and that the slope of the saturation curve at Hc has a larger reduction for smaller N. An increase of the magnetic anisotropy (Ku) to saturation magnetization (Ms) ratio after annealing N×[Co/Ni] with N < 15 only partially describes the increase to Hc. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses performed in scanning transmission electron microscopy mode across cross-sections of as-deposited and annealed Cu/16×[Co/Ni] films show that Cu diffuses from the seed layer into grain boundaries of Co/Ni. Diffusion of Cu reduces exchange coupling (Hex) between the magnetic grains and explains the increase in Hc. Additionally, the difference in the slope of the M(H) curves at Hc between the thick (N = 16) and thin (N = 4) magnetic multilayers is due to Cu diffusion more effectively decoupling magnetic grains in the thinner multilayer.

There is a large interest in magnetic multilayers for fundamental studies and applications. To obtain desired magnetic properties, magnetic multilayers are often grown along a preferential orientation. This is achieved by depositing magnetic multilayers on top of single-crystal substrates or seed layers with a pre-set crystallographic orientation. The latter method is utilized for fabrication of textured magnetic layers in devices such as spin transfer torque random access memory (STT RAM), hard drives and magnetic sensors. In nanostructures consisting of magnetic multilayers, the seed layers also serve as a bottom contact. In this case the seed layers are desired to have low resistance.

In hard drives, magnetic recording perpendicular media,1 and tunnel magnetoresistance sensors2–4 magnetic multilayers are annealed above 573 K to optimize their magnetic and transport properties. To fabricate nanostructures, magnetic multilayers are usually heated at temperatures above 550 K. Thus, it is important to understand how microstructures and magnetic properties of magnetic multilayers are affected by annealing.

Co/Ni multilayers (ML) grown along the 111 crystallographic orientations exhibit large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), high spin polarization, and low intrinsic damping that make them a promising candidate for spintronic devices.5 To achieve strong texture along 111, Co/Ni ML are grown on top of metallic Ta/Cu seed layers and annealing is performed to optimize magnetic properties.6 It was shown that annealing above 523 K reduces the saturation magnetization, Ms and uniaxial magnetic anisotropy Ku, but increases the coercivity μ0Hc of Co/Ni ML.7–9 Co and Ni are known to interdiffuse at the interface with Cu leading to a reduction in Ms.10,11 A reduction in Ms with annealing can then be expected from increased mixing of Cu and Co/Ni at the interface. Furthermore, a strong decrease of the slope of the M(H) curve at μ0Hc is observed if Co/Ni ML are grown on top of a Cu seed layer.8 However, it is not well understood why annealing causes the observed changes in magnetic properties of the Co/Ni ML.

In the present work, the magnetic properties and microstructure of 111 Co/Ni ML grown on top of a Cu seed layer are studied after annealing. The goal is to correlate the change in magnetic properties with the change in microstructure after annealing.

Following solvent cleaning, Si (100) wafers were etched using RCA-1 method.12 Deposition was performed at room temperature using DC (Cu) and RF (Co, Ni, Ta) magnetron sputtering 2.0 × 10−3 Torr Argon pressure. Base pressure was kept below 5 × 10−8 Torr. Deposited samples were annealed at temperatures of 473, 498, 523, 548 and 573 K for 15 minutes in vacuum.

Ta(3 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/N×[Co(0.2 nm)/Ni(0.6 nm)]/Ta(3 nm) where N = 4, 6, 8, 10, 16, 32 were deposited on Si wafers. Out-of-plane XRD measurements were performed with scattering wave vector normal to the film surface. XRD data indicate that all the Co/Ni ML have 111 texture with the full width at half maximum of the c-axis distribution, FWHM, below 4°.6 

High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) imaging, as well as element mapping based on energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), were performed at 200 kV with a Talos F200X microscope equipped with a Super-X detector system (FEI). Prior to STEM analysis, to remove organic contamination, the specimen was mounted in a high-visibility low-background holder and placed for 10 s into a Model 1020 Plasma Cleaner (Fischione).

The field dependence of the magnetization is measured using a SQUID magnetometer in magnetic fields up to 7 T and by Polar magneto-optic Kerr effect (Polar MOKE) in fields up to 1 T. For details on measurement of perpendicular anisotropy with SQUID magnetometer see Arora et al.6 

Dependence of the magnetic anisotropy, Ku, and saturation magnetization, Ms, on the number of bilayer repeats N in as-deposited and annealed Ta/Cu/N×[Co/Ni]/Ta are shown in Figure 1. For as-deposited films both Ku and Ms increase with N for N ≤ 10 and then stay practically constant for higher N. Ku is not affected by annealing up to 573 K for N ≥ 16. For N ≤ 8, Ku decreases if annealing temperature exceeds 523 K. Annealing has much stronger effect on Ms than on Ku. Ms is unchanged if the annealing temperature is equal or below 473 K and decreases with increasing annealing temperature above 473 K.

FIG. 1.

SQUID magnetometry measurements of (a) Ku and (b) Ms for Ta/Cu/N×[Co/Ni]/Ta (N = 4, 6, 8, 10, 16, 32) as-deposited and annealed at 473, 523 and 573 K.

FIG. 1.

SQUID magnetometry measurements of (a) Ku and (b) Ms for Ta/Cu/N×[Co/Ni]/Ta (N = 4, 6, 8, 10, 16, 32) as-deposited and annealed at 473, 523 and 573 K.

Close modal

Normalized M(H) loops of Ta/Cu/N×[Co/Ni]/Ta (N = 4 and 16) measured by Polar MOKE are presented in Figure 2. For N = 4, the coercivity, μ0Hc, increases and the slope of the M(H) curve at μ0Hc decreases with increasing annealing temperature. A similar increase in μ0Hc is observed for N = 16 after annealing. However, for N = 16 the slope of the M(H) curve at μ0Hc does not change significantly. For both N = 4 and 16, μ0Hc increases about 0.22 T, more than ten times, after annealing at 573 K.

FIG. 2.

Normalized polar MOKE data of (a) Ta/Cu/4×[Co/Ni]/Ta and (b) Ta/Cu/16×[Co/Ni]/Ta taken after deposition and annealing at 473, 498, 523, 548 and 573 K.

FIG. 2.

Normalized polar MOKE data of (a) Ta/Cu/4×[Co/Ni]/Ta and (b) Ta/Cu/16×[Co/Ni]/Ta taken after deposition and annealing at 473, 498, 523, 548 and 573 K.

Close modal

Coercivity depends on Ku/Ms and the exchange coupling between magnetic grains, μ0Hex. Figure 1 shows that while Ku does not change much with annealing, Ms decreases with increasing annealing temperature. Thus, the increase of μ0Hc in Figure 2 is in part due to the increase of Ku/Ms with annealing temperature. However, this can not explain the ten fold increase in μ0Hc.

The dependence of μ0Hex on annealing temperatures can be estimated from the following equation13 

(1)

where Hn is the nucleation field. From Equation 1, μ0Hex of Ta/Cu/4×[Co/Ni]/Ta is reduced from 0.45 T for as-deposited to about 0.23 T after annealing at 573 K, and for Ta/Cu/16×[Co/Ni]/Ta from 0.86 T for as-deposited to about 0.74 T after annealing at 573 K. To understand these results EDXS analyses were performed in STEM mode.

Figure 3 and 4 show cross-sectional HAADF-STEM images with corresponding Co, Ni, and Cu element maps of as-deposited and annealed Ta(3 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/16×[Co(0.2 nm)/Ni(0.6 nm)]/Ta (3 nm) films, respectively. The elemental maps indicate that the diffusion of Cu into Co/Ni is not visible for the as-deposited films. After annealing at 573 K for 15 min, Cu diffuses into the grain boundaries of Co/Ni ML to about two-thirds of the thickness of the 16×[Co/Ni] ML. In Ta/Cu/4×[Co/Ni]/Ta films, the Co/Ni ML thickness is 4 times lower. Thus, it can be expected that Cu diffuses into the 4×[Co/Ni] ML grain boundaries to greater extent. The reduction in Ms observed in the 4×[Co/Ni] ML but not the 16×[Co/Ni] ML further supports this assertion.

FIG. 3.

a) Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of as-deposited Ta(3 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/16×[Co(0.2 nm)/Ni(0.6 nm)]/Ta(3 nm) with corresponding elemental maps for b) Ni, c) Co, and d) Cu obtained by EDXS analysis.

FIG. 3.

a) Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of as-deposited Ta(3 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/16×[Co(0.2 nm)/Ni(0.6 nm)]/Ta(3 nm) with corresponding elemental maps for b) Ni, c) Co, and d) Cu obtained by EDXS analysis.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

a) Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of Ta(3 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/16×[Co(0.2 nm)/Ni(0.6 nm)]/Ta(3 nm) after annealing at 573 K for 15 min with corresponding element maps for b) Ni, c) Co, and d) Cu obtained by EDXS analysis.

FIG. 4.

a) Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of Ta(3 nm)/Cu(5 nm)/16×[Co(0.2 nm)/Ni(0.6 nm)]/Ta(3 nm) after annealing at 573 K for 15 min with corresponding element maps for b) Ni, c) Co, and d) Cu obtained by EDXS analysis.

Close modal

Diffusion of Cu into grain boundaries of Co/Ni ML changes the reversal mechanism in the films by inducing more uniform magnetization reversal of individual grains. This explains the decreases in both the μ0Hex and the slope of the M(H) curve at μ0Hc (Figure 2) in Ta/Cu/4×[Co/Ni]/Ta after annealing. Additionally, the diffusion of Cu along grain boundaries is the main reason for the increase in the coercivity of films with N = 4 and 16 as shown in Figure 2.

EDXS analyses performed in STEM show that in Ta/Cu/N×[Co/Ni]/Ta annealing causes Cu diffusion from the seed layer into the grain boundaries of Co/Ni. This reduces the exchange interaction between magnetic grains and alters the magnetic properties of Ta/Cu/N×[Co/Ni]/Ta; Ms decreases for ML with N ≤ 15 while μ0Hc increases due to the presence of uniform magnetization reversal of individual grains. The slope of the M(H) curve at Hc decreases for N = 4 but not for N = 16. Cu diffusion along the grain boundaries more reduces the exchange interaction more significantly between magnetic grains in the N = 4 than the N = 16 ML.

Financial support for this project was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The use of HZDR Ion Beam Centre TEM facilities and the support by its staff is gratefully acknowledged. In particular, we acknowledge the funding of TEM Talos by the German Federal Ministry of Education of Research (BMBF) under Grant No. 03SF0451 in the framework of HEMCP.

1.
S. H.
Park
,
S. O.
Kim
,
H. S.
Oh
,
Y. S.
Kim
,
D. H.
Hong
, and
T. D.
Lee
,
IEEE Trans. Magn.
42
,
2390
(
2006
).
2.
K.
Mizunuma
,
S.
Ikeda
,
H.
Sato
,
M.
Yamanouchi
,
H.
Gan
,
K.
Miura
,
H.
Yamamoto
,
J.
Hayakawa
,
F.
Matsukura
, and
H.
Ohno
,
J. Appl. Phys.
109
(
2011
).
3.
S. S. P.
Parkin
,
C.
Kaiser
,
A.
Panchula
,
P. M.
Rice
,
B.
Highes
,
M.
Samant
, and
S.-H.
Yang
,
Nat. Mater.
3
,
862
(
2004
).
4.
W.
Feng
,
C.
Fowley
,
K.
Bernert
,
V.
Sluka
,
E.
Kowalska
,
Y.
Aleksandrov
,
J.
Lindner
,
H.
Gan
,
J.
Fassbender
,
A.
Kunz
,
R.
Hübner
,
J.
Coey
, and
A.
Deac
, in
2015 IEEE Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG)
(
2015
) pp.
1
–1.
5.
S.
Mangin
,
D.
Ravelosona
,
M. J.
Carey
,
B. D.
Terris
, and
E. E.
Fullerton
,
Nat. Mater.
5
,
210
(
2006
).
6.
M.
Arora
,
R.
Hübner
,
D.
Suess
,
B.
Heinrich
, and
E.
Girt
,
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
024401
(
2017
).
7.
H.
Kurt
,
M.
Venkatesan
, and
J. M. D.
Coey
,
J. Appl. Phys.
108
,
073916
(
2010
).
8.
G.
Wang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
B.
Ma
, and
Q. Y.
Jin
,
J. of Appl. Phys.
113
,
17C111
(
2013
).
9.
D.
Wu
,
S.
Chen
,
Z.
Zhang
,
B.
Ma
, and
Q. Y.
Jin
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
103
,
242401
(
2013
).
10.
S.
Nafis
,
J. A.
Woollam
,
Z. S.
Shan
, and
D. J.
Sellmyer
,
Journal of Applied Physics
70
,
6050
(
1991
).
11.
L. R.
Sill
,
M. B.
Brodsky
,
S.
Bowen
, and
H. C.
Hamaker
,
Journal of Applied Physics
57
,
3663
(
1985
).
12.
W.
Kern
,
RCA Review
31
,
187
(
1970
).
13.
E.
Girt
,
A.
Dobin
,
B.
Valcu
,
H.
Richter
,
X.
Wu
, and
T.
Nolan
,
IEEE Trans. Magn.
43
,
2166
(
2007
).