Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 (at. %) alloy films of 5 nm thickness are prepared by sputtering on cubic (001) oxide substrates at 200 °C. The lattice mismatch between film and substrate is varied from –4.2%, 0%, to +3.5% by employing MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3 substrates, respectively. Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 single-crystal films with bcc structure grow epitaxially on all the substrates in the orientation relationship of (001)[110]film || (001)[100]substrate. The in-plane and out-of-plane lattice constants, a and c, are in agreement within small differences ranging between +1.1% and –0.9% with the value of bulk bcc-Fe70Co30 crystal, even though there exist the lattice mismatches of –4.2% and +3.5%. The result indicates that misfit dislocations are introduced around the film/substrate interface when films are deposited on MgO and SrTiO3 substrates. The single-crystal films show in-plane magnetic anisotropies with the easy magnetization direction of bcc[100], which are reflecting the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of bulk Fe70Co30 crystal.

Magnetic tunnel junctions consisting of tunnel barrier and ferromagnetic electrode layers have been studied for applications to tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) sensors and magnetoresistive random access memory devices. In order to achieve high TMR ratios, (001)-oriented oxide layers of MgO,1,2 SrTiO3,3,4 and MgAl2O45 have been useful as the barrier layer. Fe-Co and Fe-Co-B alloys with Fe-rich compositions are typical soft magnetic materials with high saturation magnetization values and have been frequently used as the electrode material. However, the structural properties of Fe-Co and Fe-Co-B layers are affected by the B content,6,7 the deposition temperature,7 the annealing temperature,8–11 etc. When there exists a lattice mismatch of Fe-Co or Fe-Co-B layer with respect to oxide layer, misfit dislocations are considered to be introduced around the interface,12 which influences the TMR effect.13 

In order to investigate the basic structural and magnetic properties, it is useful to employ epitaxial single-crystal films, since the film uniformity and the magnetic anisotropy are well controlled. However, there are few reports on the preparation of Fe-Co and Fe-Co-B films on oxide single-crystal substrates other than MgO. In the present study, Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 (at. %) alloy films are prepared on three kinds of cubic (001) oxide single-crystal substrate, MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3. The mismatches of Fe70Co30(001)bcc lattice with respect to (001) lattices of MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3 are respectively [(21/2aFe70Co30asubstrate)/asubstrate] × 100 = –4.2%, 0%, and +3.5%, which are calculated by using the lattice constants of bulk Fe70Co30 (aFe70Co30 = 0.2858 nm14), MgO (aMgO = 0.4217nm15), MgAl2O4 (aMgAl2O4/2 = 0.4041 nm16), and SrTiO3 (aSrTiO3 = 0.3905 nm17). The film growth and the structure are investigated.

A radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering system equipped with a reflection high-energy electron diffraction facility was used for film formation. The base pressure was lower than 4 × 10–7 Pa. Polished (001) substrates of MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3 were heated at 600 °C for 1 hour to obtain clean surfaces. Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 alloy targets of 3 inch diameter were employed. The distance between target and substrate was fixed at 150 mm. The Ar gas pressure was kept constant at 0.67 Pa. The RF powers for Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 targets were respectively adjusted to 57 and 65 W, where the deposition rate was 0.02 nm/s for both materials. Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films of 5 nm thickness were deposited on the substrates at 200 °C. The film compositions were confirmed by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and the compositional ratio of Fe : Co was within (70 : 30) ± 3 at. % for both Fe-Co and Fe-Co-B films. The B contents in (Fe0.7Co0.3)-B films were not determined, since B is a light element and not detectable by EDX. The compositions of (Fe0.7Co0.3)-B films were regarded to be similar to that of (Fe0.7Co0.3)95B5 target.

The crystallographic structure and orientation relationship were studied by RHEED. The structure was investigated by 2θ/ω-scan out-of-plane and 2θχ/φ-scan in-plane X-ray diffractions (XRDs) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). The surface morphology was observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The magnetization curves were measured by vibrating sample magnetometry.

Figures 1(a)–(c) show the RHEED patterns observed for Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation by making the incident electron beam parallel to [100]substrate. Diffraction patterns from bcc(001) single-crystal surface are recognized, as shown in the simulated pattern of Fig. 1(g). Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 single-crystal films of bcc(001) orientation grow epitaxially on all the substrates. The crystallographic orientation relationships are determined by RHEED as

The (001) lattices of Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films are rotated around the film normal by 45° with respect to those of substrates, as shown in Fig. 2.

FIG. 1.

(a)–(f) RHEED patterns observed for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. (g) Schematic diagram of RHEED pattern simulated for bcc(001) single-crystal surface. The incident electron beam is parallel to (a)–(f) [100]substrate or (g) [110]bcc.

FIG. 1.

(a)–(f) RHEED patterns observed for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. (g) Schematic diagram of RHEED pattern simulated for bcc(001) single-crystal surface. The incident electron beam is parallel to (a)–(f) [100]substrate or (g) [110]bcc.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

Schematic diagrams of crystallographic orientation relationships of bcc(001) lattice on (a) MgO, (b) MgAl2O4, and (c) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation.

FIG. 2.

Schematic diagrams of crystallographic orientation relationships of bcc(001) lattice on (a) MgO, (b) MgAl2O4, and (c) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation.

Close modal

Figure 3 shows the out-of-plane XRD patterns of Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 single-crystal films. bcc(002) reflections are observed in addition to reflections from the substrates. Figure 4 shows the in-plane XRD patterns measured by making the scattering vector parallel to [110]substrate. bcc(200) reflections are recognized for the films deposited on MgO and SrTiO3 substrates. On the other hand, bcc(200) and MgAl2O4(440) reflections are considered to be overlapped for the films deposited on MgAl2O4 substrates, since the lattice misfit value is 0%. Figure 5 shows the in-plane and the out-of-plane lattice constants, a and c, which are respectively calculated from the peak angles of bcc(200) and bcc(002) reflections by using the relations of a = 2[λ/2sin(θχ)bcc(200)] and c = 2[λ/2sin(θ)bcc(002)]. The a and the c values are in agreement within small differences ranging between +1.1% and –0.9% with the value of bulk bcc-Fe70Co30 crystal (aFe70Co30 = 0.2858 nm14). The result shows that the strains in the films are very small, even though there exist the lattice mismatches of –4.2% (MgO) and +3.5% (SrTiO3). It is known that misfit dislocations are easily introduced around a film/substrate interface to reduce the strain caused by mismatch between immiscible elements when a weak binding force works between the deposited atoms and the substrate atoms. This type of epitaxial growth is reported for Cr(001)bcc/MgO(001)18 and Fe-Co(001)bcc/MgO(001)12 systems. The growth of Fe70Co30 and the (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films on MgO and SrTiO3 substrates is also considered to follow the growth mode.

FIG. 3.

Out-of-plane XRD patterns measured for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. The intensity is shown in logarithmic scale.

FIG. 3.

Out-of-plane XRD patterns measured for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. The intensity is shown in logarithmic scale.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

In-plane XRD patterns measured for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. The scattering vector is parallel to [110]substrate. The intensity is shown in logarithmic scale.

FIG. 4.

In-plane XRD patterns measured for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. The scattering vector is parallel to [110]substrate. The intensity is shown in logarithmic scale.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

[(a), (c)] In-plane and [(b), (d)] out-of-plane lattice constants, a and c, of [(a), (b)] Fe70Co30 and [(c), (d)] (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation.

FIG. 5.

[(a), (c)] In-plane and [(b), (d)] out-of-plane lattice constants, a and c, of [(a), (b)] Fe70Co30 and [(c), (d)] (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation.

Close modal

Figure 6 shows the AFM images. Flat surfaces with the arithmetical mean roughness (Ra) values less than 0.14 nm are formed for all films. Figure 7 shows the in-plane magnetization curves measured by applying the magnetic field along bcc[100] or bcc[110]. The films are easily magnetized when the magnetic field is applied along bcc[100], whereas the magnetization curves measured along bcc[110] saturate at higher magnetic fields. There were no clear differences in the hysteresis loops measured along bcc[100] and bcc[010] and measured along bcc[110] and bcc[11¯0] (not shown here). Therefore, the films show four-fold symmetries in in-plane magnetic anisotropies, which are reflecting the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of bulk Fe70Co30 crystal with the easy magnetization axes of bcc<100>.

FIG. 6.

AFM images observed for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation.

FIG. 6.

AFM images observed for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation.

Close modal
FIG. 7.

In-plane magnetization curves measured for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. The magnetic field is applied along bcc[100] or bcc[110].

FIG. 7.

In-plane magnetization curves measured for (a)–(c) Fe70Co30 and (d)–(f) (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films deposited on (a, d) MgO, (b, e) MgAl2O4, and (c, f) SrTiO3 substrates of (001) orientation. The magnetic field is applied along bcc[100] or bcc[110].

Close modal

Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 films are prepared on (001) substrates of MgO, MgAl2O4, and SrTiO3, where the lattice misfit values are –4.2%, 0%, and +3.5%, respectively. The film growth and the structure are investigated by RHEED and XRD. Fe70Co30 and (Fe70Co30)0.95B5 single-crystal films of bcc(001) orientation are formed on all the substrates. The crystallographic orientation relationships are determined as Fe70Co30, (Fe70Co30)0.95B5(001)[110] MgO, MgAl2O4, SrTiO3(001)[100]. The (001) lattices of films are rotated around the film normal by 45° with respect to those of substrates. The in-plane and out-of-plane lattice constants, a and c, are in agreement within small differences ranging between +1.1% and –0.9% with the value of bulk bcc-Fe70Co30 crystal, even though there exist lattice mismatches of –4.2% and +3.5%. The result indicates that misfit dislocations are introduced at the film/substrate interface to reduce the strain caused by lattice mismatch when films are deposited on MgO and SrTiO3 substrates. The single-crystal films show in-plane magnetic anisotropies reflecting the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of bulk Fe70Co30 crystal.

A part of this work was supported by Chuo University Grant for Special Research.

1.
S. S. P.
Parkin
,
C.
Kaiser
,
A.
Panchula
,
P. M.
Rice
,
B.
Hughes
,
M.
Samant
, and
S. H.
Yang
,
Nature Mater.
3
,
862
(
2004
).
2.
S.
Yuasa
,
T.
Nagahama
,
A.
Fukushima
,
Y.
Suzuki
, and
K.
Ando
,
Nature Mater.
3
,
868
(
2004
).
3.
J. M.
De Teresa
,
A.
Barthélémy
,
A.
Fert
,
J. P.
Contour
,
R.
Lyonnet
,
F.
Montaigne
,
P.
Seneor
, and
A.
Vaurès
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
82
,
4288
(
1999
).
4.
M.
Sugiyama
,
J.
Hayakawa
,
K.
Itou
,
H.
Asano
,
M.
Matsui
,
A.
Sakuma
, and
M.
Ichimura
,
J. Magn. Soc. Jpn.
25
,
795
(
2001
).
5.
H.
Sukegawa
,
H.
Xiu
,
T.
Ohkubo
,
T.
Furubayashi
,
T.
Niizeki
,
W.
Wang
,
S.
Kasai
,
S.
Mitani
,
K.
Inomata
, and
K.
Hono
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
96
,
212505
(
2010
).
6.
L.
Reichel
,
L.
Schultz
,
D.
Pohl
,
S.
Oswald
,
S.
Fähler
,
M.
Werwiński
,
A.
Edström
,
E. K.
Delczeg-Czirjak
, and
J.
Rusz
,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
27
,
476002
(
2015
).
7.
K.
Serizawa
,
M.
Ohtake
,
M.
Futamoto
,
F.
Kirino
, and
N.
Inaba
,
J. Magn. Soc. Jpn.
41
(
2017
) [in press].
8.
Y. H.
Ghang
,
S. W.
Yung
,
T. S.
Chin
, and
M. P.
Hung
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
26
,
2041
(
1987
).
9.
J.
Yu
,
C.
Chang
,
D.
Karns
,
G.
Ju
,
Y.
Kubota
,
W.
Eppler
,
C.
Brucker
, and
D.
Weller
,
J. Appl. Phys.
91
,
8357
(
2002
).
10.
K.
Lee
,
J. J.
Sapan
,
S. H.
Kang
, and
E. E.
Fullerton
,
J. Appl. Phys.
109
,
123910
(
2011
).
11.
N.
Sato
,
R. M.
White
, and
S. X.
Wang
,
J. Appl. Phys.
108
,
152405
(
2016
).
12.
K.
Matsubara
,
M.
Ohtake
,
F.
Kirino
, and
M.
Futamoto
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
303
,
012093
(
2011
).
13.
F.
Bonell
,
S.
Andrieu
,
C.
Tiusan
,
F.
Montaigne
,
E.
Snoeck
,
B.
Belhadji
,
L.
Calmels
,
F.
Bertran
,
P.
Le Fèvre
, and
A.
Taleb-Ibrahimi
,
Phys. Rev. B
82
,
092405
(
2010
).
14.
A.
Winkelmann
,
M.
Przybylski
,
F.
Luo
,
Y.
Shi
, and
J.
Barthel
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
96
,
257205
(
2006
).
15.
F.
Yildiz
,
M.
Przybylski
,
X.-D.
Ma
, and
J.
Kirschner
,
Phys. Rev. B
80
,
064415
(
2009
).
16.
Y.
Chiang
and
W. D.
Kingery
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
72
,
271
(
1989
).
17.
Y.
Inaguma
,
J. H.
Sohn
,
I. S.
Kim
,
M.
Itoh
, and
T.
Nakamura
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
61
,
3831
(
1992
).
18.
A.
Nakamura
,
M.
Koguchi
, and
M.
Futamoto
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
34
,
2307
(
1995
).