How to reduce friction for improving efficiency in the usage of energy is a constant challenge. Layered material like MoS2 has long been recognized as an effective surface lubricant. Due to low interfacial shear strengths, MoS2 is endowed with nominal frictional coefficient. In this work, MoS2 solid-lubricating film was directly grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on Si substrate using MoCl5 and H2S. Various methods were used to observe the grown MoS2 film. Moreover, nanotribological properties of the film were observed by an atomic force microscope (AFM). Results show that MoS2 film can effectively reduce the friction force by about 30-45% under different loads, indicating the huge application value of the film as a solid lubricant. Besides the interlayer-interfaces-sliding, the smaller capillary is another reason why the grown MoS2 film has smaller friction force than that of Si.

Friction induces a great deal of energy waste in numerous sectors of the society, and the efforts of human to reduce it have never been stopped in the past thousands of years. Recently, layered materials such as graphite1–3 and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs)4–6 have attracted wide attentions for their ability to reduce friction effectively as the surface lubricants. MoS2, as one number of TMDCs, interaction of the adjacent layers is van der Waals forces. So, the interlayer-interfaces-sliding possesses nominal frictional coefficient owing to low interfacial shear strengths from the weak interlayer interactions within MoS2.1,7,8 Meanwhile, due to the hexagonal networks formed by Mo and S atoms with stable covalent bonds in layer, MoS2 can withstand heavy load with high compressive strength in the out-of-layer direction.9 These excellent characters ensure MoS2 as solid-lubricating film and protective surface coating.2,10–13

Recently, MoS2 film grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) has aroused wide concerns. Chemisorption and self-limiting chemical reactions of ALD can provide MoS2 film with strong interaction to the substrate and controllable number of layers (NL).14–20 This strong interaction can bind MoS2 film strongly to the substrate, which can ensure it does not fall off in the lubrication process.21 ALD of MoS2 contains four steps: pulse and purge molybdenum precursor, pulse and purge sulfur precursor, which mean the MoS2 film with desired thickness can be got by repeating these steps. As a simple and stable method to grow conformal and uniform film, ALD provides a possibility for the excellent material in large scale applications.

In this work, we report MoS2 solid-lubricating film directly grown by ALD on Si substrate using MoCl5 and H2S as precursors. Different methods were used to observe the grown MoS2 films. Moreover, nanotribological properties of the grown MoS2 film were observed by an atomic force microscope (AFM).

A single side polished bare Si wafer was chosen as the growth substrate. After acetone and ethanol cleaning in an ultrasonic bath, the wafer was put into a commercial ALD setup (SUNALETMR-100, Picosun) to grow the MoS2 films. The growth temperature was kept at 460 °C under the pressure of 5.3 hPa. The schematic illustrations of ALD MoS2 film were shown in Fig. 1. As precursors, MoCl5 (99.6%) and H2S (99.6%) were alternately vaporized into ALD reaction chamber by N2 (99.999%) flow at a rate of 50 sccm. Before the growth, in order to the sufficient vapor pressure, MoCl5 was heated to the preset temperatures and kept for half an hour. Consequently, an ALD cycle contains four steps: pulsing the MoCl5 (0.5 s), purging the reaction chamber (30 s), pulsing the H2S (0.5 s), purging the reaction chamber again (30 s). The MoS2 film with desired thickness can be got by repeating these steps. Tribological properties of the grown MoS2 film were observed by an AFM tip.

FIG. 1.

Schematic showing the ALD of MoS2. MoCl5 and H2S were chosen as precursors and alternately exposed onto the Si substrate to grow the MoS2 film. Friction measurements of the grown film were carried out by an AFM tip.

FIG. 1.

Schematic showing the ALD of MoS2. MoCl5 and H2S were chosen as precursors and alternately exposed onto the Si substrate to grow the MoS2 film. Friction measurements of the grown film were carried out by an AFM tip.

Close modal

Uniformity, species composition and content analysis of the grown MoS2 film were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Raman spectroscopy was used to observe the crystal structure of the MoS2 film, using an excitation light of 532 nm laser with 0.8 mW power and 1 µm spot. The crystal structure of the MoS2 film was also characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). XRD was carried out with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) at 35 mA and 50 kV. HRTEM was taken using an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The tribological properties of the grown MoS2 films were studied by AFM in contact mode. A Si probe with a normal spring constant of 2.7 N/m and a tip radius of about 10 nm was used for scanning the surface of the grown MoS2 film. During the friction measurement, the tip was scanned along the direction perpendicular to the cantilever, in which the signal of torsion corresponded to the friction force was extracted. The applied load range and the scan velocity are 10-50 nN and 10 µm/s. Moreover, adhesion force experiments were carried out in the force-displacement mode. During the measurements, the temperature and the relative humidity were kept at 27 ± 1 °C and 50–60 % respectively. Only relative friction forces (units, mV) were measured owing to the lack of a calibration standard.

Thicknesses of the grown MoS2 films were observed by AFM. According to AFM images and height profiles (Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)), thicknesses of the MoS2 films obtained by 100-ALD cycles and 10-ALD cycles are ∼43.2 nm and ∼2.51 nm respectively. Temperature window of ALD MoS2 is shown in Fig. 2(c). If the temperature is lower than 440 °C, the surface reactions will be incomplete. Elevating the temperature could increase the film thickness by improving the chemical reactivity and occupations of MoCl5 and H2S. However, if the temperature is higher than 470 °C, thermal decomposition will occur, which leads to the decrease of the film thickness. According to Fig. 2(d), growth-per-cycle (GPC) value of the MoS2 film obtained at 460 C was calculated to be 0.42 nm/cycle.

FIG. 2.

AFM images and height profiles of MoS2 films obtained by 100-ALD cycles (a) and 10-ALD cycles (b) at 460 °C. (c) Thickness of MoS2 film against growth temperature. The ALD was performed by 100 cycles. (d) Thickness of MoS2 film grown at 460 °C against number of ALD cycles.

FIG. 2.

AFM images and height profiles of MoS2 films obtained by 100-ALD cycles (a) and 10-ALD cycles (b) at 460 °C. (c) Thickness of MoS2 film against growth temperature. The ALD was performed by 100 cycles. (d) Thickness of MoS2 film grown at 460 °C against number of ALD cycles.

Close modal

MoS2 film obtained by 100-ALD-cycle on the Si substrate was observed by SEM (Fig. 3(a)), which indicates the MoS2 film surface is uniform and compact. Raman spectra are shown in inset. A1g mode and E2g1 mode are sharply shown at 408 cm-1 and 383cm-1, which indicates the grown film with high crystallinity is bulk 2H-MoS2. EDS spectra were used to observe the composition of the MoS2 film in Fig. 3(b). Atomic percentages of atoms S (2.61%) and Mo (1.31%) confirm the grown film is MoS2. The crystal structure of the grown MoS2 film was also characterized by HRTEM. Typical layered structure of MoS2 can be observed in Fig. 3(c). The cross-sectional HRTEM image of the MoS2 film is shown in Fig. 3(d), which indicates the spacing is 0.65nm for (002) lattice planes paralleled to the substrate. A planar HRTEM image of the MoS2 film and the corresponding fast Fourier transformation (FFT) pattern are shown in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f). The typical atomic spacing of MoS2 can be observed from the clear hexagonal sets of dots in the reciprocal space image, which indicates the inner hexagon is belong to (100) planes with spacing of 0.26nm, and the outer is belong to (110) planes with spacing of 0.16nm.

FIG. 3.

(a) SEM image of MoS2 film obtained by 100-ALD-cycle on a Si substrate. Inset is the Raman spectra. (b) EDS of the MoS2 film. The weight percentage and the atomic percentage of chemical element are shown in the inset. (c) TEM image of the grown MoS2 film. The layered structure of MoS2 can be clearly observed. (d) Cross-sectional HRTEM image of the grown MoS2 film. (e) Planar HRTEM image of the grown MoS2 film shows the crystal structure. (f) Fast Fourier-transformed pattern for (e).

FIG. 3.

(a) SEM image of MoS2 film obtained by 100-ALD-cycle on a Si substrate. Inset is the Raman spectra. (b) EDS of the MoS2 film. The weight percentage and the atomic percentage of chemical element are shown in the inset. (c) TEM image of the grown MoS2 film. The layered structure of MoS2 can be clearly observed. (d) Cross-sectional HRTEM image of the grown MoS2 film. (e) Planar HRTEM image of the grown MoS2 film shows the crystal structure. (f) Fast Fourier-transformed pattern for (e).

Close modal

HRTEM was used to measure grain size of the grown MoS2. There are two grains A (size of ∼9.1 nm) and B (size of ∼15.1 nm) in the planar view (Fig. 4(a)), indicating crystal size of c-axis (002) orientation may be within 9-15 nm. XPS spectra for the grown MoS2 are shown in Figs. 4(b) and 4(c). The stoichiometric ratio was determined by the ratio of the S2p3/2 and Mo3d5/2 peaks. S/Mo ratio of 1.85 indicates a slight lack of sulfur in the grown MoS2 film.

FIG. 4.

(a) HRTEM showing grain size of the grown MoS2. XPS spectra of (b) Mo3d and (c) S2p peaks for ALD MoS2 film.

FIG. 4.

(a) HRTEM showing grain size of the grown MoS2. XPS spectra of (b) Mo3d and (c) S2p peaks for ALD MoS2 film.

Close modal

The friction measurement was carried out by an AFM tip (Fig. 5(a)). Inset is SEM image of tip. AFM images of bare Si substrate and 10-ALD-cycle MoS2 film are shown in Figs. 5(b) and 5(c), in which RMS roughness values are 0.48 and 0.72 nm respectively. According to Fig. 5(c), the smooth and compact film is made up of nano-crystalline MoS2. Inset shows high resolution XRD of the grown MoS2 film. A diffraction peak related to the (002) plane of MoS2 at 14.2 degree is sharply shown. Presence of the unique (002) peak indicates the hexagonal MoS2 film is highly oriented, suggesting the (002) basal planes of as-grown MoS2 film can be parallel to the Si substrate. The crystal size was calculated by the Debye-Scherrer equation:

(1)

where D is the size of crystal, λ is the wavelength of X-ray (λ=1.54Å), β is the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) value, and θ is the Bragg angle. The crystal size of c-axis (002) orientation was obtained as 11.4 nm. This agrees with the HRTEM data well. XRD results indicate that the AFM tip is slid on the (002) plane of nano-crystalline MoS2 in friction measurement process. Friction forces Ff(Si) of Si and Ff(MoS2) of MoS2 film under different loads are shown in Fig. 5(d). Obviously, MoS2 film can effectively reduce the friction force by about 30-45% ((Ff(Si) - Ff(MoS2))/Ff(Si)) under different loads. The friction force of Si increases linearly with load. However, the friction force of MoS2 is nonlinear with load, which may be attributed to the interlayer-interfaces-sliding. The interlayer-interfaces-sliding endows MoS2 with nominal friction force, and the sliding processes are different owing to various strains caused by different loads.

FIG. 5.

(a) Schematic showing the friction measurement by AFM. AFM images of bare Si (b) and 10-ALD-cycle MoS2 film (c). Inset is the XRD spectra. (d) Friction forces as a function of different loads.

FIG. 5.

(a) Schematic showing the friction measurement by AFM. AFM images of bare Si (b) and 10-ALD-cycle MoS2 film (c). Inset is the XRD spectra. (d) Friction forces as a function of different loads.

Close modal

During the sliding of AFM tip, friction force can be divided into two parts, one is related to the applied load of tip, the other is related to the adhesion force between the tip and the sample surface. Adhesion forces of Si and 10-ALD-cycle MoS2 film are shown in Fig. 6. Their water contact angles are shown in Inset. Adhesion forces both of Si and MoS2 almost keep unchanged under different loads. It can be observed that the adhesion force of MoS2 film is significantly lower than that of Si, which indicates the friction force of MoS2 induced by adhesion force should be lower than that of Si. Adhesion force is composed of various forces, such as electrostatic force, van der Waals force and capillary, in which the capillary has the strongest influence. For the spherical tip and the flat surface, the capillary force can be calculated as

(2)

where R is the tip radius, γL is the surface tension of water, θ is the contact angle of water. According to Fig. 6, the contact angle of MoS2 film is 88.7°, which is bigger than 69.2° of Si, indicating the capillary force of MoS2 film is smaller than that of Si. So, the lower friction force of MoS2 related to the adhesion force is mainly owing to the smaller capillary force.

FIG. 6.

Adhesion force as a function of different loads. Inset is the water contact angles of bare Si and 10-ALD-cycle MoS2 film.

FIG. 6.

Adhesion force as a function of different loads. Inset is the water contact angles of bare Si and 10-ALD-cycle MoS2 film.

Close modal

In summary, MoS2 solid-lubricating film has been directly fabricated on Si substrates by ALD using MoCl5 and H2S as precursors. The grown MoS2 film can effectively reduce the friction force by about 30-45% under different loads. Besides the interlayer-interfaces-sliding, the smaller capillary is another reason why the grown MoS2 film has smaller friction force than that of Si. These results indicate the huge application value of the grown MoS2 film as a solid lubricant.

This work is financially supported by the Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar of Jiangsu Province (BK20170023), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675360, 51675502, 51775105, 51775001, 51775530, 51775051), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3202006301, 3202006403), the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province, the International Foundation for Science, Stockholm, Sweden, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, The Hague, Netherlands, through a grant to Lei Liu (F/4736-2), the grants from Top 6 High-Level Talents Program of Jiangsu Province(2017-GDZB-006, Class A), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150505), the Tribo1ogy Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology (SKLTKF15A11), Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University (Kfkt2016-11), the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (YBPY1703), and Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of solid lubrication.

1.
W.
Park
,
J.
Baik
,
T. Y.
Kim
,
K.
Cho
,
W. K.
Hong
,
H. J.
Shin
, and
T.
Lee
,
ACS Nano
8
,
4961
(
2014
).
2.
A. K.
Geim
and
I. V.
Grigorieva
,
Nature
499
,
419
(
2013
).
3.
M.
Chhowalla
,
H. S.
Shin
,
G.
Eda
,
L. J.
Li
,
K. P.
Loh
, and
H.
Zhang
,
Nat. Chem.
5
,
263
(
2013
).
4.
K.
Liu
,
Q. M.
Yan
,
M.
Chen
,
W.
Fan
,
Y. H.
Sun
,
J.
Suh
,
D. Y.
Fu
,
S.
Lee
,
J.
Zhou
,
S.
Tongay
,
J.
Ji
,
J. B.
Neaton
,and
J. Q.
Wu
,
Nano Lett.
14
,
5097
(
2014
).
5.
L.
Spanu
,
S.
Sorella
, and
G.
Galli
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
103
,
4
(
2009
).
6.
M.
Dienwiebel
,
G. S.
Verhoeven
,
N.
Pradeep
,
J. W. M.
Frenken
,
J. A.
Heimberg
, and
H. W.
Zandbergen
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
92
,
4
(
2004
).
7.
J. M.
Martin
,
C.
Donnet
,
T.
Lemogne
, and
T.
Epicier
,
Phys. Rev. B
48
,
10583
(
1993
).
8.
M.
Hirano
,
K.
Shinjo
,
R.
Kaneko
, and
Y.
Murata
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
67
,
2642
(
1991
).
10.
J. C.
Spear
,
J. P.
Custer
, and
J. D.
Batteas
,
Nanoscale
7
,
10021
(
2015
).
11.
K. S.
Kim
,
H. J.
Lee
,
C.
Lee
,
S. K.
Lee
,
H.
Jang
,
J. H.
Ahn
,
J. H.
Kim
, and
H. J.
Lee
,
ACS Nano
5
,
5107
(
2011
).
12.
X. M.
Gao
,
M.
Hu
,
J. Y.
Sun
,
Y. L.
Fu
,
J.
Yang
,
W. M.
Liu
, and
L. J.
Weng
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
330
,
30
(
2015
).
13.
H. J.
Song
,
B. A.
Wang
,
Q. A.
Zhou
,
J. X.
Xiao
, and
X. H.
Jia
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
419
,
24
(
2017
).
14.
L.
Liu
,
Y. Z.
Huang
,
J. J.
Sha
, and
Y. F.
Chen
,
Nanotechnology
28
,
7
(
2017
).
15.
J. J.
Pyeon
,
S. H.
Kim
,
D. S.
Jeong
,
S. H.
Baek
,
C. Y.
Kang
,
J. S.
Kim
, and
S. K.
Kim
,
Nanoscale
8
,
10792
(
2016
).
16.
D. K.
Nandi
,
U. K.
Sen
,
D.
Choudhury
,
S.
Mitra
, and
S. K.
Sarkar
,
Electrochim. Acta
146
,
706
(
2014
).
17.
Y.
Jang
,
S.
Yeo
,
H. B. R.
Lee
,
H.
Kim
, and
S. H.
Kim
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
365
,
160
(
2016
).
18.
S.
Shin
,
Z.
Jin
,
D. H.
Kwon
,
R.
Bose
, and
Y. S.
Min
,
Langmuir
31
,
1196
(
2015
).
19.
Z.
Jin
,
S.
Shin
,
D. H.
Kwon
,
S. J.
Han
, and
Y. S.
Min
,
Nanoscale
6
,
14453
(
2014
).
20.
S.
Cadot
,
O.
Renault
,
M.
Fregnaux
,
D.
Rouchon
,
E.
Nolot
,
K.
Szeto
,
C.
Thieuleux
,
L.
Veyre
,
H.
Okuno
,
F.
Martin
,and
E. A.
Quadrelli
,
Nanoscale
9
,
538
(
2017
).
21.
T. M.
Mayer
,
J. W.
Elam
,
S. M.
George
,
P. G.
Kotula
, and
R. S.
Goeke
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
82
,
2883
(
2003
).