Water-walking insects such as water striders can skate on the water surface easily with the help of the hierarchical structure on legs. Numerous theoretical and experimental studies show that the hierarchical structure would help water strider in quasi-static case such as load-bearing capacity. However, the advantage of the hierarchical structure in the dynamic stage has not been reported yet. In this paper, the function of super hydrophobicity and the hierarchical structure was investigated by measuring the adhesion force of legs departing from the water surface at different lifting speed by a dynamic force sensor. The results show that the adhesion force decreased with the increase of lifting speed from 0.02 m/s to 0.4 m/s, whose mechanic is investigated by Energy analysis. In addition, it can be found that the needle shape setae on water strider leg can help them depart from water surface easily. Thus, it can serve as a starting point to understand how the hierarchical structure on the legs help water-walking insects to jump upward rapidly to avoid preying by other insects.

The hierarchical structure1–5 on legs helps water striders walk on the water surface easily as shown in Fig. 1. Super hydrophobicity may make it very easy to detach legs from the surface, as insects need to jump and skate on the surface. Many estimates and experiments show that the adhesion force and the energy required to depart a leg from water surface decrease dramatically as the contact angle approaches 180.4 The adhesion force (pull-off) of water strider legs was measured by Pal Jen Wei, which was found to be 2 dyn.5 Keh-chih Hwang stated that nano to micro structural hierarchy is crucial for stable super hydrophobic and water-repellent surface and the second level structure results in dramatic reduction in the contact area and minimizing adhesion between water and the solid surface.6 Keh-chih Hwang established a 2D model to analyze the process of legs that detach from the water surface. The model shows that the super hydrophobicity of the legs’ surface is critically important for reducing the detaching force and detaching energy.7 

FIG. 1.

The superhydrophobic leg of water striders (a) A water strider in a lotus pond. (b) Micro-morphology of a hairy hydrophobic water strider leg (c) The nanosized grooves on each hair.

FIG. 1.

The superhydrophobic leg of water striders (a) A water strider in a lotus pond. (b) Micro-morphology of a hairy hydrophobic water strider leg (c) The nanosized grooves on each hair.

Close modal

However, only quasi-static experiment is reported by former researchers.5,7 In this paper, the adhesion force acted on the leg when departing from the water surface at different speeds was investigated. This results may help to understand the function of super hydrophobicity in the dynamic process when skating on water surface.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations clearly revealed that legs of water striders are covered with a large number of tiny setae,8–12 as shown in Fig. 1(b). A high-resolution SEM image shows that setae are long and softly serrated, and they are about 100 μm in length and less than 5 μm in diameter in the root and 0.2 μm in diameter in the apex. There are nano grooves on each seta, which is shown in Fig. 1(c). From the SEM image, the seta are not compactly arranged, but are well spaced out with a longitudinal space of 20 μm and a lateral space of 10 μm. The number of seta would not be too small, or the epidermis of legs would be wetted when pressed down.

To check the adhesion force acted on the leg when departing from the water surface, an in situ dynamic force measurement system13–17 which is schematically shown in Fig. 2, was used to record force data and photographs during the whole process. In this study, a back leg was used to investigate the adhesion force and mounted on the fast stage. The vertical force of a leg against a water surface was measured by a dynamic force measurement sensor (DFMS) made of Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) moving a water strider leg by a stage. A water drop (5 uL) was placed on the surface of DFMS. To monitor the deformation of the water surface, an optical microscope lens and a camera system are used to record the departing process.

FIG. 2.

Measuring the adhesion force acted on a water strider leg when departing from water at different pulling speeds by DFMS.

FIG. 2.

Measuring the adhesion force acted on a water strider leg when departing from water at different pulling speeds by DFMS.

Close modal

The leg was moved to contact with water surface. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the water did not spread on this leg indicated that the hydrophobicity was well.18–21 The force acted on the leg departing from water surface at lifting speed from 0.02 m/s to 0.4 m/s was measured by DFMS at the sampling rate of 10000 Hz as shown in Fig. 3(b).

FIG. 3.

The force acted on the legs when pulling away from the water surface (a) The image of water striders’ leg when pulling away from the water surface. (b) The adhesion force acted on the water strider leg when being lifted slowly.

FIG. 3.

The force acted on the legs when pulling away from the water surface (a) The image of water striders’ leg when pulling away from the water surface. (b) The adhesion force acted on the water strider leg when being lifted slowly.

Close modal

Fig. 4 shows the relationship between the lifting speed and force for water striders’ leg. The adhesion force decreased from 0.12 μN to 0.03 μN with the increase of speed, U, from 0.02 m/s to 0.4 m/s. The low adhesion force would help water strider jumping upward easily. The function of setae on departing from water surface may result from the needle shape, the model of energy detaching from water surface for a needle shape seta was built, and the reason for the decrease of adhesive force with the increase of lifting speed was explained.

FIG. 4.

The relationship between the lifting speed and the adhesion force for water strider leg.

FIG. 4.

The relationship between the lifting speed and the adhesion force for water strider leg.

Close modal

The needle-shape seta had the thin apex which is about 0.2 μm. The root of seta links to the epidermis of legs which is extremely thick. The stiffness of setae varies a lot along to the length of seta, as shown in Fig. 5. The stiffness could be calculated using Eq. (1) and (2). In this way, the thickness of the root ensured that the epidermis could not be wetted when pressed down the water surface, as shown in Fig. 5.

k(l)=x=0lEILxdxdx
(1)
I=π64[d(x)*(Lx)L]4
(2)

where L refers to the length which is about 100 μm, E is the elastic modulus and d(x) is the diameter of setae.

FIG. 5.

The stiffness of setae on water strider leg along x direction. (a) The stiffness of seta in different places. (b) The contact model between water strider leg and water surface.

FIG. 5.

The stiffness of setae on water strider leg along x direction. (a) The stiffness of seta in different places. (b) The contact model between water strider leg and water surface.

Close modal

When the leg pulling up, the seta on each leg would be bent by the adhesion force as shown in Fig. 6. Water would be peeled from the needle shape seta.22–24 The seta would be made vertical to the water surface. The bending of seta would reduce the perimeter to the diameter of seta which is about 0.2 μm. The relation between the force F and the diameter D as Fsπ·D· γ = 45 nN. The adhesion work of the seta and water surface Edet is

Edet=0.25πD2γ
(3)

where, γ is surface tension coefficient, 72 mJ/m2. The bent seta could reduce the contact area significantly, and thereby decrease the work detaching from the water surface. So the needle-shape setae would help water strider to jump upward or forward with small energy.

FIG. 6.

The theoretical model of water strider leg when pulling away from the water surface. (a) Illustration of the leg when pulling away from the water surface. (b) Schematic illustration of the seta when peeling away from the water surface.

FIG. 6.

The theoretical model of water strider leg when pulling away from the water surface. (a) Illustration of the leg when pulling away from the water surface. (b) Schematic illustration of the seta when peeling away from the water surface.

Close modal

Now, we will discuss the relationship between the lifting speed and adhesion force. As shown in Fig. 4, the adhesion force decreases significantly with the increase of lifting speed. The water surface would be lifted up by seta. The departing condition is that the energy acted on the water, E, is equal to Edet. The lifting water, whose mass is m, would obtain potential work Ep = mgh and kinetic energy Ek = 0.5·m·U2. For all lifting speeds, the total work detaching from water surface is constant which is determined by the hydrophobicity of leg. Higher lifting speed leads to large kinetic energy and small potential work. As for slow lifting speed, Ek is very small, and Ep would be very large. The adhesion force Fs = mg, which is proportional to Ep. In this case, higher lifting speed would lead to small adhesion force, while slower lifting speed could bring about large adhesion force. The adhesion force on water strider leg would dramatically decrease under the condition of high lifting speed with the help of needle shape setae.

In summary, in this paper, the dynamic force measurement setup is built to support dynamical studies on super hydrophobic surfaces for a better understanding of setae’s function on water strider leg. The function of super hydrophobicity and the hierarchical structure was investigated by measuring the adhesion force of legs when departing from the water surface at different speeds. The results show that the needle shape setae on legs of water striders can help them save energy. Our force measurement device could also be adopted to other water walking insects such as water spiders and water treaders, whose setae on the leg are different from water striders. In the next step, the function of water spiders and water treaders’ setae would be investigated.

When measuring the force acted on the leg of water striders by DFMS, the procedure is recommended as follows:

Step 1. Calibrate DFMS using electrostatic force proposed in Ref. 15, 16.

Step 2. Move the leg to the water drop placed on the surface of DFMS by the highly accurate stage. Observe the output of DFMS to check whether the leg and the drop remain touching or not.

Step 3. Move the leg down to 0.1 mm.

Step 4. After 10 s, move the leg upward to depart from the drop. This process was monitored by a camera. During this period, the force acted on the leg is measured.

Step 5. Repeat step 4 for different lifting speeds.

The authors thank the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2011BAK15B06) for their support.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1.
X.
Gao
and
L.
Jiang
,
Nature
432
,
36
(
2004
).
2.
D. L.
Hu
,
B.
Chan
, and
J. W. M.
Bush
,
Nature
424
,
663
666
(
2003
).
3.
C. G.
Jiang
,
S. C.
Xin
, and
C. W.
Wu
,
AIP Adv.
1
,
225
(
2011
).
4.
D. G.
Lee
and
H. Y.
Kim
,
J. Fluid Mech.
624
,
23
32
(
2009
).
5.
P. J.
Wei
,
S. C.
Chen
, and
J. F.
Lin
,
Langmuir
25
,
1526
(
2009
).
6.
Y.
Su
,
B.
Ji
, and
K.
Hwang
,
Langmuir
26
,
4984
(
2010
).
7.
Y.
Su
,
B.
Ji
, and
K.
Hwang
,
Langmuir
26
,
18926
18937
(
2010
).
8.
D.
Vella
,
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
47
,
115
135
(
2015
).
9.
X. Q.
Feng
,
X.
Gao
,
Z.
Wu
,
L.
Jiang
, and
Q. S.
Zheng
,
Langmuir
23
,
4892
4896
(
2007
).
10.
R. B.
Suter
,
G.
Stratton
, and
P.
Miller
,
J. Arachnol.
31
,
428
432
(
2003
).
11.
W.
Yin
,
Y. L.
Zheng
,
H. Y.
Lu
,
X. J.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Tian
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
109
,
163701
(
2016
).
12.
Y. L.
Zheng
,
H. Y.
Lu
,
W.
Yin
,
D. S.
Tao
,
L. C.
Shi
, and
Y.
Tian
,
Langmuir
32
,
10522
10528
(
2016
).
13.
Y.
Fujii
,
Meas. Sci. Technol.
14
,
1741
(
2003
).
14.
Y.
Fujii
,
Meas. Sci. Technol.
14
,
65
(
2002
).
15.
Y. L.
Zheng
,
L.
Song
, and
G.
Hu
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
85
,
055002
055008
(
2014
).
16.
Y. L.
Zheng
,
L.
Song
, and
G.
Hu
,
Meas. Sci. Technol.
26
,
055001
055007
(
2015
).
17.
L.
Song
,
Y. L.
Zheng
,
G.
Hu
, and
J. Y.
Ma
,
Instrum. Sci. Technol.
44
,
386
400
(
2016
).
18.
D.
Vella
and
L.
Mahadevan
,
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
817
825
(
2005
).
19.
D.
Vella
and
P. D.
Metcalfe
,
Phys. Fluids
19
,
072108
(
2007
).
20.
D.
Vella
,
Langmuir
24
,
8701
8706
(
2008
).
21.
D.
Vella
,
D. G.
Lee
, and
H. Y.
Kim
,
Langmuir
22
,
5979
5981
(
2006
).
22.
J.
Zhao
,
X.
Zhang
,
N.
Chen
, and
Q.
Pan
,
ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces
4
,
3706
3711
(
2012
).
23.
F.
Shi
,
J.
Niu
,
J.
Liu
,
Z.
Wang
,
X. Q.
Feng
, and
X.
Zhang
,
Adv. Mater.
19
,
2257
2261
(
2007
).
24.
T. W.
Ng
and
Y.
Panduputra
,
Langmuir
28
,
453
458
(
2011
).