Alloys based on the half-Heusler compound TiNiSn with the addition of Mn or with a substitution of Ti by Mn are investigated as high-temperature thermoelectric materials. In both materials an intrinsic phase separation is observed, similar to TiNiSn where Ti has been partially substituted by Hf, with increasing Mn concentration the phase separation drastically reduces the lattice thermal conductivity while the power factor is increased. The thermoelectric performance of the n-type conducting alloy can be optimized both by substitution of Ti by Mn as well as the addition of Mn.

Energy consumption and efficiency is increasing continuously, but in many industrial processes and consumer applications, a significant amount of energy is lost as waste heat.1 The interest in recycling waste heat into electricity makes thermoelectric generators one of the intensive research fields. In contrast to small-scale devices, for waste-heat recovery applications abundant, cheap and environmentally-friendly materials are required. Thermoelectric materials have been explored and developed over time to reach technological requirements for various use, depending on the operating temperature scale.2 The efficiency of a single thermoelectric material, the dimensionless figure of merit, ZT, is defined by the interdependent parameters σ (electrical conductivity), S (Seebeck coefficient), κ (thermal conductivity) and T (absolute temperature).

ZT=S2σκT
(1)

Among various materials, narrow band-gap half-Heusler compounds with 18 valence electrons became promising thermoelectric materials3 e.g., with n-type conduction MNiSn, (M = Ti, Zr, Hf) or with p-type conduction MCoSb (M =Ti, Zr, Hf). They exhibit high electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient, have good thermal stability and consists of low-cost environmentally friendly constituents.1,4–6 Half-Heusler compounds have the general formula XYZ, and crystallize in a face-centered cubic crystal structure (MgAgAs structure type) with the Wyckoff positions 4a (0, 0, 0), 4b (1/2, 1/2, 1/2), and 4c (1/4, 1/4, 1/4) occupied.7 The main obstacle for thermoelectric applications is their too high thermal conductivity originating from the high lattice thermal conductivity.8–10 

Many strategies have been applied to enhance the performance of half-Heusler compounds, such as adding nanoparticles to bulk material,11 nano-structuring by ball milling followed by spark plasma sintering or hot pressing,12–16 phase separation induced through isoelectronic alloying to have increased point defect, boundary phonon scattering17–19 and systematic doping studies20–22 for yielding an optimized power factor. Especially phase separation reduces the thermal conductivity at the cost of a minimal effect on power factor, which results in a better figure of merit.

It is reported that the attempt of substituting Ti for Mn in Co2MnSn leads to the formation of two compounds, Co2MnSn and Co2TiSn, and the grain boundaries formed thereby are beneficial to increase phonon scattering.23 In the present work it is demonstrated that phase separation in TiNiSn alloys can also be induced by the substitution of Ti by Mn or the addition of Mn. Both alloying strategies result in a significant reduction of the thermal conductivity and an increase of the electrical conductivity.

The two series of compounds Ti1-xMnxNiSn and TiMnyNiSn (x or y = 0, 0.01-0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20) were prepared by arc melting of stoichiometric amounts of Ti, Mn, Ni and Sn (all with purities >99.9%) in argon atmosphere. Samples were flipped at least three times with intermediate crushing to ensure homogeneity. The as-cast samples were annealed at 900°C for 3 days or at 800°C for 7 days in evacuated quartz ampoules (details are given in the supplementary material). For higher Mn concentrations (x or y = 0.15, 0.20) tantalum ampoules were used to avoid Mn reacting with the quartz ampoules. Following the annealing, the samples were quenched in ice-water. The obtained ingots were cut into platelets and bars for transport measurements.

The crystal structure was characterized by powder x-ray diffraction (XRD, Huber imaging plate, Guiner camera G670) with Cu Kα1 radiation and Ge (111) monochromator at room temperature. Microstructure and composition was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES 5100 SVDV, Agilent Technologies) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL 7800F, field emission gun cathode) with energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDXS; Bruker, silicon drift detector).

The pycnometric density was measured using an AccuPyc 1330 device in helium gas atmosphere. The chamber was flushed with helium gas several times before measurement. The values given are averages of 20 measurements on each sample. Specific heat capacity was determined by a Netzsch 404C differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) using Ar atmosphere and with a heating rate of 20°C/min up to 500°C.

Thermal diffusivity was determined using the laser-flash method (Netzsch LFA 457). The Seebeck coefficient (S) and the electrical conductivity (σ) were measured simultaneously (ZEM 3, ULVAC) under helium gas atmosphere up to 900K.

The XRD patterns of all samples show the C1b structure as main phase. On substituting Mn on the Ti site, Mn-containing impurity phases appear from 3% Mn concentration, which is in agreement with literature.24 LeBail fitting using the Jana2006 software25 gives the lattice parameters 5.929Å, 5.921Å and 5.927Å for the 0%, 1%, 2% nominal substitution samples, respectively. Taking into account that Mn has a smaller atomic radius than Ti, lattice parameters get smaller upon successful substitution. The larger lattice parameter observed at 2% than at 1% attributes to its analyzed Mn concentration of 0.2% revealed by ICP-OES analysis (see supplementary material). The powder XRD patterns are also given in the supplementary material. Phase analysis is performed using XRD data as well as SEM-EDXS and ICP-OES analyses. It is seen that there is no clear correlation between Mn adding or substitution concentration (x or y) and the appearance of impurity phases. Small amounts of β-Sn were present in the majority of the samples. The highest β-Sn phase amount of 2.6 % is found in the Ti0.85Mn0.15NiSn sample.

A LeBail fit of the powder XRD data of TiMn0.02NiSn (i.e. y = 0.02; see supplementary material) indicates that besides the main phase the sample contains Sn and MnSn2 impurity phases which are also identified in the backscattered electron SEM images (cf. Fig. 1a).

FIG. 1.

Microstructure of TiMn0.02NiSn a) Backscattered electron SEM image b) Element-specific EDXS mappings for Mn, Ni, Sn, Ti, O and C. The lighter color represents higher concentrations of the specific element c) Optical polarized light image.

FIG. 1.

Microstructure of TiMn0.02NiSn a) Backscattered electron SEM image b) Element-specific EDXS mappings for Mn, Ni, Sn, Ti, O and C. The lighter color represents higher concentrations of the specific element c) Optical polarized light image.

Close modal

In Fig. 1a, based on EDXS analyses, the gray colored region corresponds to the TiNiSn phase, whereas darker grains are Ti-rich phase and the light colored regions are MnSn2 or Sn impurities. There are small black dots in the whole region which are identified as titanium oxide precipitations in element-specific EDXS mappings (Fig. 1b). These spots have diameters in the range of 1 μm. However, no oxygen content could be detected in regular EDXS analyses.

In the TiMnyNiSn series, increasing Mn concentration enhances the phase separation (Fig. 2d–f). However, in the Ti1-xMnxNiSn series, phase separation does not correspond linearly to Mn concentration (Fig.2a–c). The sample Ti0.85Mn0.15NiSn has regular sized grains compared to Ti0.8Mn0.2NiSn. This feature leads to higher electrical conductivity and lower Seebeck coefficient than for Ti0.8Mn0.2NiSn (Fig. 3). However, the two samples have similar thermal conductivity (Fig. 4a1). Unlike other samples, Ti0.98Mn0.02NiSn shows uniformly dispersed Sn-rich dendritic phase (Fig. 2a). Its morphological effect is discussed below.

FIG. 2.

Back scattered electron SEM images of some samples: Ti1-xMnxNiSn, a) x = 0.02, b) x = 0.15, c) x = 0.20 TiMnyNiSn d) y = 0.02, e) y = 0.15, f) y = 0.20.

FIG. 2.

Back scattered electron SEM images of some samples: Ti1-xMnxNiSn, a) x = 0.02, b) x = 0.15, c) x = 0.20 TiMnyNiSn d) y = 0.02, e) y = 0.15, f) y = 0.20.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

a) Electrical conductivity, b) Seebeck coefficient, c) and power factor for substitution (Ti1-xMnxNiSn) and addition (TiMnyNiSn) alloys.

FIG. 3.

a) Electrical conductivity, b) Seebeck coefficient, c) and power factor for substitution (Ti1-xMnxNiSn) and addition (TiMnyNiSn) alloys.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

a) Thermal conductivity (κ) and b) figure of merit for substitution (Ti1-xMnxNiSn) or adding (TiMnyNiSn), respectively.

FIG. 4.

a) Thermal conductivity (κ) and b) figure of merit for substitution (Ti1-xMnxNiSn) or adding (TiMnyNiSn), respectively.

Close modal

The electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient and power factor for the samples of the two series are plotted as function of temperature in Fig. 3. All samples show semiconducting behavior, i.e. the conductivity increases linearly as temperature increases. The most dramatic change occurs for 2% Mn substitution (x = 0.02), where the electrical conductivity increases two fold compared to TiNiSn at T = 800 K. However, this unusual increase is attributed to its morphology which differs quite strongly from the rest of the series. The present dendritically formed Sn-rich metallic phase favors carrier conductivity effectively, which results in higher electrical conductivity and lower Seebeck coefficient. This morphological effect to the transport properties can be explained via general effective media (GEM) approach.26 

Also adding high amounts of Mn (y = 0.10, y = 0.15 and y = 0.20) leads to a less temperature-dependent behavior of the electrical conductivity. Similar results are reported when adding 10 or 15 % Ni to TiNiSn.27 In all these cases this is probably due to the increased amount of impurity phases that contribute to electrical conductivity. The element-specific EDXS mappings and microstructure images of TiMn0.15NiSn are given in the supplementary material.

All samples show negative Seebeck coefficient values in the whole investigated temperature range, which indicates that the majority of the charge carriers are electrons (n-type). Substitution with Mn changes the Seebeck coefficient significantly, while adding Mn does not change it much until y = 0.10. For this level of adding the electrical conductivity increases, but the Seebeck coefficient decreases due to inverse relations between S (Seebeck coefficient) and n (electron carrier concentration),2 

S=8π2kB23eh2m*T(π3n)23
(2)

where m* is an effective mass. The highest Seebeck coefficient reached is -249 μV K-1 for Ti0.97Mn0.03NiSn and -242 μV K-1 for Ti0.95Mn0.05NiSn at 566 K. In both series, the maximum power factor occurs in the temperature range 700-800 K. The highest value of 3.6 mW K-2m-1 (Fig. 3c1) is attained in Ti0.95Mn0.05NiSn at 712 K. The spurious peak in power factor is ascribed to decomposition of a minor Mn3Sn2 impurity phase. It is reported that, Mn3Sn2 lies in narrow homogeneity range and decomposes peritectoidally into Mn2-xSn and MnSn2 upon heating at 753K.28 

The thermal conductivity of the samples (Fig. 4a) is calculated using κ = DCpd, where Cp is the specific heat capacity, d the density of the samples, and D the thermal diffusivity. In all samples, Mn addition as well as substitution decreases the thermal conductivity roughly according to Mn concentration. This implies enhanced phonon scattering in the phase and at the grain boundaries. The lowest thermal conductivities are found for 10% Mn (x = 0.1 or y = 0.1) in both series. The values are 4.4 W K-1m-1 in TiMn0.1NiSn and 4.7 W K-1 m-1 in Ti0.9Mn0.1NiSn which are significantly lower than 8.0 W K-1m-1 in TiNiSn at room temperature. Some samples show small cusp in thermal conductivity at 500K implying the sign of β-Sn impurity phase.

The figures of merit ZT are presented in Fig. 4b. The highest figure of merit ZT = 0.42 is found in Ti0.95Mn0.05NiSn at 712 K and ZT = 0.43 in TiMn0.2NiSn at 813 K. These values are 94% and 96% improvements, respectively, compared to TiNiSn. TiMn0.02NiSn shows an enhanced figure of merit ZT = 0.38 in the temperature range of 711-837 K due to its improved Seebeck coefficient and reduced thermal conductivity.

In conclusion, modifying the half-Heusler compound TiNiSn by introduction of Mn is proven to be an effective way to reduce the lattice thermal conductivity and enhance the electronic properties for thermoelectric applications. As a result, the best materials yield almost twice higher figure of merit than the unmodified material. This work illustrates the possibility to enhance the figure of merit through phase separation induced in an alloy of cheap, abundant, and overall quite environmentally-friendly materials.

See supplementary material for the contains powder XRD patterns of Ti1-xMnxNiSn and TiMnyNiSn series samples, details on the samples (preparation, average composition and impurity phases) and microstructure images of TiMn0.15NiSn.

The authors thank Dr. Ulrich Burkhardt, Sylvia Kostmann and Petra Scheppan for SEM images and EDXS analyses. We acknowledge financial support by the ERC Advanced Grant No. 291472 “Idea Heusler.”

1.
S.
Chen
and
Z.
Ren
, “
Recent progress of half-Heusler for moderate temperature thermoelectric applications
,”
Materials Today
16
,
387
395
(
2013
).
2.
G. J.
Snyder
and
E. S.
Toberer
, “
Complex thermoelectric materials
,”
Nature Materials
7
,
105
114
(
2008
).
3.
F.
Casper
,
T.
Graf
,
S.
Chadov
,
B.
Balke
, and
C.
Felser
, “
Half-Heusler compounds: Novel materials for energy and spintronic applications
,”
Semiconductor Sci. Technol.
27
,
063001
(
2012
).
4.
J.-W. G.
Bos
and
R. A.
Downie
, “
Half-Heusler thermoelectrics: A complex class of materials
,”
J. Physics: Condensed Matter
26
,
433201
(
2014
).
5.
J.
Krez
 et al, “
Long-term stability of phase-separated half-Heusler compounds
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
17
,
29854
29858
(
2015
).
6.
E.
Rausch
,
B.
Balke
,
S.
Ouardi
, and
C.
Felser
, “
Long-term stability of (Ti/Zr/Hf) CoSb1−xSnx thermoelectric p-type half-Heusler compounds upon thermal cycling
,”
Energy Technology
3
,
1217
1224
(
2015
).
7.
T.
Graf
,
C.
Felser
, and
S. S.
Parkin
, “
Simple rules for the understanding of Heusler compounds
,”
Progress Solid State Chem.
39
,
1
50
(
2011
).
8.
H.
Hohl
 et al, “
Efficient dopants for ZrNiSn-based thermoelectric materials
,”
J. Physics: Condensed Matter
11
,
1697
(
1999
).
9.
C.
Uher
,
J.
Yang
,
S.
Hu
,
D.
Morelli
, and
G.
Meisner
, “
Transport properties of pure and doped MNiSn (M = Zr, Hf)
,”
Phys. Rev. B
59
,
8615
(
1999
).
10.
Y.
Xia
 et al, “
Thermoelectric properties of semimetallic (Zr, Hf)CoSb half-Heusler phases
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
88
,
1952
1955
(
2000
).
11.
S. J.
Poon
 et al, “
Half-Heusler phases and nanocomposites as emerging high-ZT thermoelectric materials
,”
J. Mater. Res.
26
,
2795
2802
(
2011
).
12.
G.
Joshi
 et al, “
Enhancement in thermoelectric figure-of-merit of an n-type half-Heusler compound by the nanocomposite approach
,”
Advanced Energy Materials
1
,
643
647
(
2011
).
13.
L.
Hicks
and
M.
Dresselhaus
, “
Effect of quantum-well structures on the thermoelectric figure of merit
,”
Phys. Rev. B
47
,
12727
(
1993
).
14.
X.
Yan
 et al, “
Stronger phonon scattering by larger differences in atomic mass and size in p-type half-Heuslers Hf1−xTixCoSb0.8Sn0.2
,”
Energy Environ. Sci.
5
,
7543
7548
(
2012
).
15.
S.
Chen
 et al, “
Effect of Hf concentration on thermoelectric properties of nanostructured n-type half-Heusler materials HfxZr1–xNiSn0.99Sb0.01
,”
Advanced Energy Materials
3
,
1210
1214
(
2013
).
16.
W.
Xie
 et al, “
Recent advances in nanostructured thermoelectric half-Heusler compounds
,”
Nanomaterials
2
,
379
412
(
2012
).
17.
E.
Rausch
,
B.
Balke
,
S.
Ouardi
, and
C.
Felser
, “
Enhanced thermoelectric performance in the p-type half-Heusler (Ti/Zr/Hf)CoSb0.8Sn0.2 system via phase separation
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
16
,
25258
25262
(
2014
).
18.
M.
Schwall
and
B.
Balke
, “
Phase separation as a key to a thermoelectric high efficiency
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
15
,
1868
1872
(
2013
).
19.
S.
Populoh
 et al, “
High figure of merit in (Ti,Zr,Hf)NiSn half-Heusler alloys
,”
Scripta Materialia
66
,
1073
1076
(
2012
).
20.
J.
Krez
 et al, “
Optimization of the carrier concentration in phase-separated half-Heusler compounds
,”
J. Mater. Chem. A
2
,
13513
13518
(
2014
).
21.
E.
Rausch
,
B.
Balke
,
T.
Deschauer
,
S.
Ouardi
, and
C.
Felser
, “
Charge carrier concentration optimization of thermoelectric p-type half-Heusler compounds
,”
APL Materials
3
,
041516
(
2015
).
22.
K.
Gałązka
 et al, “
Improved thermoelectric performance of (Zr0.3Hf0.7)NiSn half-Heusler compounds by Ta substitution
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
115
,
183704
(
2014
).
23.
T.
Graf
 et al, “
Phase-separation-induced changes in the magnetic and transport properties of the quaternary Heusler alloy Co2Mn1−xTixSn
,”
Phys. Rev. B
82
,
104420
(
2010
).
24.
F.
Wang
,
T.
Fukuhara
,
K.
Maezawa
, and
S.
Masubuchi
, “
Mn doping in half-Heusler semiconductors: Microstructural and transport properties
,”
Japan. J. Appl. Phys.
49
,
053002
(
2010
).
25.
V.
Petříček
,
M.
Dušek
, and
L.
Palatinus
, “
Crystallographic computing system JANA2006: General features
,”
Z. Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials
229
,
345
352
(
2014
).
26.
O.
Appel
,
T.
Zilber
,
S.
Kalabukhov
,
O.
Beeri
, and
Y.
Gelbstein
, “
Morphological effects on the thermoelectric properties of Ti0.3Zr0.35Hf0.35Ni1+δ Sn alloys following phase separation
, “
J. Mater. Chem. C
3
,
11653
11659
(
2015
).
27.
C. S.
Birkel
 et al, “
Improving the thermoelectric properties of half-Heusler TiNiSn through inclusion of a second full-Heusler phase: Microwave preparation and spark plasma sintering of TiNi1+xSn
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
15
,
6990
6997
(
2013
).
28.
M.
Stange
,
H.
Fjellvåg
,
S.
Furuseth
, and
B.
Hauback
, “
Crystal structure and phase relations for Mn3Sn2 and non-stoichiometric Mn2−xSn
,”
J. Alloys Compounds
259
,
140
144
(
1997
).

Supplementary Material