Successful direct wafer bonding between InP and silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers has been demonstrated by adopting a 20-nm-thick Al2O3 as the intermediate layer. A detailed investigation on the property of the bonding interface is carried out. Water contact angle test reveals an improved hydrophilicity for both the InP and the Al2O3/SOI wafers after oxygen plasma surface activation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is employed to characterize the bonding interface before and after the wafer bonding process. It is found that oxides are formed on the bonding interface during bonding, which helps ensure high quality hydrophilic bonding.

In recent years, significant breakthrough has been made in the field of silicon photonics, and various Si-based integrated photonic devices have been developed, making Si-based optical systems promising for future information processing and communications, especially in data center and super-computing.1–4 However, silicon is not an efficient light emitting material due to its indirect band gap. As a result, bonding III-V compound semiconductors to silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers has become a key technology to realize hybrid integrated light sources in silicon photonics.1,5–7 Hybrid integration can be realized either by wafer bonding through of a thin layer of adhesive organic medium such as benzocyclobutene (BCB),8,9 or through direct wafer bonding.9–14 In direct wafer bonding, two wafers of different materials are bonded covalently. Thus it not only allows improved optical coupling due to the proximity between the III-V active material and the silicon waveguide, but also facilitates heat dissipation through the bonding interface. Recently, successful direct wafer bonding using Al2O3 as the intermediate layer has been demonstrated.15 In this Letter, plasma-assisted InP/Al2O3/SOI direct wafer bonding is carried out, and excellent bonding result is confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). To clarify the bonding mechanism, contact angle (CA) measurement is carried out to investigate the influence of surface treatment on the hydrophilicity of the wafers. Furthermore, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is employed to reveal the changes on the InP and Al2O3/SOI interface. These results provide a better insight to the physical/chemical model of InP/Al2O3/SOI direct wafer bonding.

In our experiment, 345-μm-thick boron-doped n-InP wafer and 545-μm-thick SOI wafer with 670 nm n-type Si top layer are adopted for wafer bonding. Firstly, vertical outgassing channels are etched in the top silicon layer of the SOI wafer, so that gaseous by-products such as water vapor can be absorbed during bonding, and no bubbles or voids will form at the bonding interface.16–19 A layer of 20-nm-thick Al2O3 is then deposited on the SOI wafer by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at 300°C. On the other hand, the InP wafer is soaked in 30% ammonia solution for 3 minutes after standard organic cleaning. Oxygen plasma surface activation for both InP and Al2O3/SOI wafers are carried out in a reactive ion etching (RIE) chamber with RF power of 85 W, O2 gas flow of 28 sccm, and a chamber pressure of 40 mTorr for 28 seconds. Spontaneous bonding between InP and SOI occurs when the two wafers are pressed against each other. To complete the bonding process, the sample is further annealed at 280°C for 8 hours with an applied pressure of 1.5 MPa.

In our experiment, InP wafer with a size of 1cm×1cm is bonded to 1cm×1cm SOI wafer following the above-mentioned procedures. High bonding strength is achieved for the bonded InP/Al2O3/SOI sample, as confirmed by crack opening test. Figure 1 is the TEM image of the bonded sample. It is evident that InP and SOI wafers are boned tightly through a 20-nm-thick Al2O3 intermediate layer. As can be seen, the Al2O3 layer is uniformly bonded with no sign of a micro-void which confirms that a seamless bond at the microscale has been successfully achieved.

FIG. 1.

TEM image of the directly bonded InP/Al2O3/SOI sample.

FIG. 1.

TEM image of the directly bonded InP/Al2O3/SOI sample.

Close modal

Plasma-assisted wafer bonding is considered to be a hydrophilic bonding.20,21 Water contact angle test is adopted to investigate the hydrophilicity of the wafer surfaces after pre-bonding treatment. According to Table I, the contact angle of InP wafer decreases from 54.5° to 16.2° after plasma activation, whereas that of SOI wafer drops from 32.5° to 10.8°. The decrease in contact angle implies improved hydrophilicity of the wafer surface. This can be attributed to the increased density of -OH containing groups, which are known to interact and polymerize even at room temperature, provided that they are in close proximity.22,23 Thus, the contact angle measurement confirms the plausibility of hydrophilic bonding.

TABLE I.

Contact angle of InP and Al2O3/SOI in bonding process.

Contact angle (°)
SpecimenAs-receivedAfter surface activation
InP 54.5 16.2 
Al2O3/SOI 32.5 10.8 
Contact angle (°)
SpecimenAs-receivedAfter surface activation
InP 54.5 16.2 
Al2O3/SOI 32.5 10.8 

In order to understand the bonding mechanism, XPS is employed to characterize the wafer surfaces before and after the bonding process. To facilitate the analysis of bonded wafer, special samples are prepared by using SOI wafer without outgassing channels. For such samples, the InP wafer can be de-bonded from the SOI wafer with ease, as a result of the bubbles formed during bonding process. Samples without vertical outgassing channels are submitted to the same pre-bonding treatment and bonding process as the normal ones, so that information concerning the bonding interface could be collected from the de-bonded wafer pairs.

Figure 2 depicts the XPS data of the InP wafer, and it is found that chemical substances on the InP surface include InP, In2O3 and InPO4. Comparing Figs. 2(a)–2(b) with Figs. 2(c)–2(d), it is evident that the percentage of oxidized indium on the InP surface increases after oxygen plasma activation. For direct wafer bonding, oxides on the wafer surfaces can absorb bonding by-products (H2O etc.) so as to reduce formation of voids at the bonding interface.24 The increase in hydrophilic oxides is corroborated by the reduced contact angle after plasma activation, as shown in Table I. Figures 2(c) and 2(d) show that oxygen plasma activation leads to formation of InPO4 and In2O3. The hydrophilicity of InPO4 and In2O3 on the InP surface enables them to absorb water molecules, so that they can be bonded with the hydrophilic Al2O3/SOI wafer. Meanwhile, it is known that oxygen plasma surface activation results in opened dangling bonds of molecules on the surface of InP, thus enabling them to be covalently attracted to the molecules on the surface of Al2O3/SOI wafer.25 Figures 2(e) and 2(f) are the XPS data of the de-bonded InP wafer. Comparing Fig. 2(d) with Fig. 2(f), it is noticed that the relative percentage of InP has drastically dropped, whereas the percentages of oxides have increased. On the other hand, it deserves special attention that the relative percentage of phosphate radical in oxides is significantly increased after bonding, as revealed by Figs. 2(c) and 2(e). The increase in oxides implies that a water thermal oxidation process has occurred at the bonding interface. In fact, water trapped at the interface between the hydrophilic InP and Al2O3/SOI surfaces may form oxides during the bonding process. Figure 2(e) indicates that indium element exists in three forms, namely, In-P, In-O and In-PO4, whereas Fig. 2(f) reveals that aside from InP and InPO4, new substances with binding energies of 133.3 eV and 130.3 eV have emerged in the P 2p XPS spectrum. To identify such substances formed during the bonding process, we need the XPS data taken on the surface of the de-bonded Al2O3/SOI sample.

FIG. 2.

XPS spectra taken at the InP surface. (a), (c), (e) core level XPS data of In 3d, and (b), (d), (f) core level XPS data of P 2p. (a) and (b) are taken from as-received InP wafer, (c) and (d) are taken from the InP wafer after oxygen plasma activation. (e) and (f) are are taken from the de-bonded InP sample.

FIG. 2.

XPS spectra taken at the InP surface. (a), (c), (e) core level XPS data of In 3d, and (b), (d), (f) core level XPS data of P 2p. (a) and (b) are taken from as-received InP wafer, (c) and (d) are taken from the InP wafer after oxygen plasma activation. (e) and (f) are are taken from the de-bonded InP sample.

Close modal

Figure 3 shows the XPS data of the de-bonded Al2O3/SOI wafer. Figure 3(a) depicts the Al 2p XPS spectrum, indicating that in addition to Al2O3, there is Al element on the Al2O3/SOI surface in the form of AlPO4. This means that Al element on Al2O3/SOI and P element on InP have combined to form covalent bonds. Therefore, it can be concluded that the substance with a binding energy of 133.3 eV in the P 2p XPS spectrum shown in Fig. 2(f) is AlPO4. The core level O 1s XPS data in Fig. 3(b) shows that O element not only exists in the form of Al2O3, but also as In2O3 and AlPO4. This is an evidence that oxygen on the Al2O3/SOI surface has combined with In and P on the surface of InP. All the above data corroborate that SOI and InP wafers do bond with each other through the thin layer of Al2O3. It can also be inferred that complex chemicals exist on the bonding interface, such as In2O3, InPO4 and AlPO4, which help bond InP and Al2O3/SOI tightly to form bonding system with high bonding strength and thin bonding interface. As for the substance with a binding energy 130.3 eV, it has not been identified in any literature so far. A possible candidate might be P-O-In-Al, but further proof is required.

FIG. 3.

The XPS result of the de-bonded SOI wafer. (a) is core level XPS data of Al 2p and (b) is core level XPS data of O 1s.

FIG. 3.

The XPS result of the de-bonded SOI wafer. (a) is core level XPS data of Al 2p and (b) is core level XPS data of O 1s.

Close modal

Meanwhile, indium element is detected on Al2O3/SOI surface. According to the core level In 3d XPS data in Fig. 4, indium element on the surface of Al2O3/SOI only exists in the form of In2O3 and InPO4nH2O, which proves that indium oxide, together with Al2O3/SOI wafer, actually comes off the InP wafer during the de-bonding process. It also confirms the high bonding strength between InP and Al2O3/SOI wafers.

FIG. 4.

Core level XPS data of In3d XPS taken from the de-bonded SOI wafer.

FIG. 4.

Core level XPS data of In3d XPS taken from the de-bonded SOI wafer.

Close modal

In summary, the interface of the bonded InP/Al2O3/SOI sample is studied in detail. Tight bonding between InP and SOI is obtained with Al2O3 as the intermediate layer, as confirmed by the TEM measurement. XPS data taken with wafers before and after bonding process reveals the chemical substances involved in the bonding process, and provide a better insight to the bonding mechanism. These studies can be of great aid to the study of building physical/chemical model of InP/Al2O3/SOI direct wafer bonding.

This work was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB340002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61210014, 61621064, 61574082 and 51561165012), the High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2015AA017101), Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (20131089364, 20161080068, 20161080062), and the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics (IOSKL2014KF09).

1.
A. W.
Fang
,
H.
Park
,
Y. H.
Kuo
,
R.
Jones
,
O.
Cohen
,
D.
Liang
,
O.
Raday
,
M. N.
Sysak
,
M. J.
Paniccia
, and
J. E.
Bowers
,
Mater. Today
10
,
28
(
2007
).
2.
A.
Black
,
A. R.
Hawkins
,
N. M.
Margalit
,
D. I.
Babic
,
A. L.
Holmes
, Jr.
,
Y. L.
Chang
,
P.
Abraham
,
J. E.
Bowers
, and
E. L.
Hu
,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
3
,
943
(
1997
).
3.
K. Y.
Byun
,
I.
Ferain
,
P.
Fleming
,
M.
Morris
,
M.
Goorsky
, and
C.
Colinge
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
96
,
102110
(
2010
).
4.
D.
Liang
,
G.
Roelkens
,
R.
Baets
, and
J. E.
Bowers
,
Materials
3
,
1782
(
2010
).
5.
G. H.
Duan
,
C.
Jany
,
A.
Le Liepvre
 et al.,
IEEE. J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
20
,
6100213
(
2014
).
6.
A. Y.
Liu
,
C.
Zhang
,
J.
Norman
,
A.
Snyder
,
D.
Lubyshev
,
J. M.
Fastenau
,
A. W. K.
Liu
,
A. C.
Gossard
, and
J. E.
Bowers
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
041104
(
2014
).
7.
S. S.
Sui
,
M. Y.
Tang
,
Y. D.
Yang
,
J. L.
Xiao
,
Y.
Du
, and
Y. Z.
Huang
,
Photon. Res.
3
,
289
(
2015
).
8.
Z.
Song
,
Z. M.
Tan
,
L. T.
Liu
, and
Z. Y.
Wang
,
Microsyst Technol
21
,
1633
(
2015
).
9.
F.
Niklaus
,
G.
Stemme
,
R.
Maeda
,
J.-Q.
Lu
, and
R. J.
Gutmann
,
Journal of Applied Physics.
99
,
031101
(
2006
).
10.
H.
Takagi
,
K.
Kikuchi
,
R.
Maeda
,
T. R.
Chung
, and
T.
Suga
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
68
,
2222
(
1996
).
11.
D.
Pasquariello
and
K.
Hjort
,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
8
,
118
(
2002
).
12.
K. W.
Gong
,
C. Z.
Sun
,
B.
Xiong
, and
Y.
Luo
, in
26th Int. Conf. on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials
,
Montpellier, France
,
May 11-15, 2014
, paper P26.
13.
J.
Arokiaraj
,
S.
Tripathy
,
S.
Vicknesh
, and
S. J.
Chua
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
253
,
1243
(
2006
).
14.
D.
Liang
,
A. W.
Fang
,
H.
Park
,
T. E.
Reynolds
,
K.
Warner
,
D. C.
Oakley
, and
J. E.
Bowers
,
J. Electron. Mater.
37
,
1552
(
2008
).
15.
P.
Anantha
and
C. S.
Tan
,
Microsyst Technol.
21
,
1015
(
2015
).
16.
D.
Liang
and
J. E.
Bowers
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
26
,
1560
(
2008
).
17.
U.
Gösele
and
Q.-Y.
Tong
,
Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.
28
,
215
(
1998
).
18.
M. K.
Weldon
,
Y. J.
Chabal
,
D. R.
Hamann
,
S. B.
Christman
,
E. E.
Chaban
, and
L. C.
Feldman
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B
14
,
3095
(
1996
).
19.
S.
Mack
,
H.
Baumann
,
U.
Gösele
,
H.
Werner
, and
R.
Schlogl
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
144
,
1106
(
1997
).
20.
X. B.
Ma
,
C.
Chen
,
W.
Liu
,
X. Y.
Liu
,
X. F.
Du
,
Z. T.
Song
, and
C. L.
Lin
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
156
,
H307
(
2009
).
21.
A. U.
Alam
,
M. M. R.
Howlader
, and
M. J.
Deen
,
J. Micromech. Microeng.
24
,
035010
(
2014
).
22.
C.
Maleville
,
O.
Rayssac
,
H.
Moriceau
,
B.
Biasse
,
L.
Baroux
,
B.
Aspar
, and
M.
Bruel
, in
4th International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding - Science, Technology and Applications
(
Paris, France
,
1998
), p.
46
.
23.
Q. Y.
Tong
,
T. H.
Lee
,
U. M.
Gösele
,
M.
Reiche
,
J.
Ramm
, and
E.
Beck
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
144
,
384
(
1997
).
24.
X. X.
Zhang
and
J. P.
Raskin
,
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.
14
,
368
(
2005
).
25.
Q. Y.
Tong
and
U. M.
Gösele
,
Microsystems. Adv. Mater.
11
,
1409
(
1999
).