The average valence, ValO, of the oxygen anions in the perovskite oxide BaTiO3, was found using O1s photoelectron spectra to be −1.55. This experimental result is close to the theoretical value for BaTiO3 (−1.63) calculated by Cohen [Nature 358, 136 (1992)] using density functional theory. Using the same approach, we obtained values of ValO for several monoxides, and investigated the dependence of ValO and the ionicity on the second ionization energy, V(M2+), of the metal cation. We found that the dependence of the ionicity on V(M2+) in this work is close to that reported by Phillips [Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 317 (1970)]. We therefore suggest that O1s photoelectron spectrum measurements should be accepted as a general experimental method for estimating the ionicity and average valence of oxygen anions.

Cohen1 calculated the densities of states (DOS) for valence electrons in the perovskite oxide BaTiO3 using density functional theory (DFT), and the calculated results indicated that the average valences of Ba, Ti and O are 2, 2.89 and −1.63, respectively. In other words, about 37% of the oxygen ions in BaTiO3 were calculated to be monovalent, with the result that there must be O2p holes in the outer orbits of the monovalent oxygen ions. These O2p holes are expected to affect the physical properties of the materials, and it is therefore very important to study the average valence of oxygen anions in oxides.

It is well known that there are both ionic and covalent bonds in oxides, and the ionicity has been defined as the fraction of ionic bonds among all the ionic and covalent bonds.2 In our opinion, the value of the ionicity (fi) for the oxides can be understood as half the average valence (ValO) of the oxygen anions, fi = |ValO|/2. Therefore, fi = |ValO|/2.000 = 0.815 for BaTiO3 according to Cohen’s calculation. In 1932 and 1939, Pauling reported his ionicity investigation. In 1970, Phillips2 improved the ionicity calculation and reviewed studies of the ionicity of simple compounds. He gave the ionicities of some II-VI compounds, for example, 0.602, 0.841, 0.913 and 0.926 for BeO, MgO, CaO and SrO, respectively. Thomas et al3 reported the ionicities of the dihalides MX2 (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) obtained using the dielectric theory of chemical bond, and found values ranging from fi ≈ 0.72 for NiI2 to fi ≈ 0.80 for MnCl2. On the basis of dielectric theory, Chelikowsky et al4 examined the relationship between spectroscopic crystal ionicity and the spatial structure of several II-VI and III-V compounds. Somewhat later, using a measure of the asymmetry of the valence charge distribution in ANB8−N compounds, García et al5 provided a first-principles mapping to Pauling’s ionicity scale for ANB8−N solids. Balamurugan et al6 examined the relationship between the ionicity of Cu2O samples and their particle size using Cu2p X-ray photoelectron spectra. Arif et al7 reported their investigation of the ionicity factor based on the energy gap of semiconductors with a hexagonal structure, using density functional theory (DFT) with full-potential linear augmented plane wave theory. Ascarelli8 investigated ionicity of metallic oxide surfaces on metals using Auger spectroscopy measured by X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS). We have, however, found that the values of the ionicity given by various authors show significant differences for a given compound, and that a general method for estimating ionicity is therefore required.

In 2000, Dupin et al9 proposed that a portion of the O ions in oxides are O1− ions on the basis of analyses of O1s spectra measured by XPS, and gave the average net charges (qo) of the oxygen ions in several compounds; namely, −1.15, −1.18, −1.05, −1.78 and −1.85 for TiO2, ZrO2, CoO, CaO and SrO, respectively. For these oxides, fi = |qo|/2, and thus, for CaO and SrO, the values of fi (0.890 and 0.925, respectively) are close to those (0.913 and 0.926) from Phillips’s calculation. Unfortunately, there are few other reports on using the O1s spectra to estimate ionicity.

In this paper, we use the O1s spectrum to estimate ValO for BaTiO3, and find a value (−1.55) which is close to the calculated value (−1.63) given by Cohen.1 We then estimate the values of ValO and fi for several monoxides using the O1s spectra, and study the relationship between the values of fi and the ionization energies.

Our samples included the perovskite oxide BaTiO3, and the monoxides CaO, MnO, CoO, ZnO, NiO and CuO. All of these samples were obtained as commercial chemical powders.

The crystal structures of the samples were identified using an X’Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα(λ = 1.5406 Å) radiation, at room temperature. The data were collected in the 2θ range 15-120° with a step size of 0.01671°. The X-ray diffraction data for all samples were analyzed using the X’Pert HighScore Plus software, and it was found that all samples had single phase crystal structures. This analysis also provided the crystal lattice parameters and crystallite sizes of the samples, as shown in Table I. Crystallite sizes were estimated using the X-ray diffraction data and the Scherrer Equation with the X’Pert HighScore Plus software, which provides reasonable estimates for sizes less than roughly 100 nm. In Table I, therefore, the sizes of the larger crystallites are listed as >100 nm.

TABLE I.

Molar mass, purity, crystallite size, crystal system and lattice parameters for the samples.

Molecular formula Molar mass (g/mol) Purity (%) Crystallite Size (nm) Crystal system Lattice Parameters (nm, °)
BaTiO3  233.19  99.5  >100  Tetragonal  a = 0.3995, b = 0.3995, c = 0.4033 
CaO  56.08  98.0  >100  Cubic  a = 0.4810 
MnO  70.94  99.5  >100  Cubic  a = 0.4446 
CoO  74.93  99.0  47.3  Cubic  a = 0.4261 
ZnO  81.39  99.0  >100  Hexagonal  a = 0.3250, b = 0.3250, c = 0.5207 
NiO  74.69  99.0  13.6  Cubic  a = 0.4181 
CuO  79.55  99.0  27.7  Monoclinic  a = 0.4682, b = 0.3428, c = 0.5130α = γ = 90.00, β = 99.41 
Molecular formula Molar mass (g/mol) Purity (%) Crystallite Size (nm) Crystal system Lattice Parameters (nm, °)
BaTiO3  233.19  99.5  >100  Tetragonal  a = 0.3995, b = 0.3995, c = 0.4033 
CaO  56.08  98.0  >100  Cubic  a = 0.4810 
MnO  70.94  99.5  >100  Cubic  a = 0.4446 
CoO  74.93  99.0  47.3  Cubic  a = 0.4261 
ZnO  81.39  99.0  >100  Hexagonal  a = 0.3250, b = 0.3250, c = 0.5207 
NiO  74.69  99.0  13.6  Cubic  a = 0.4181 
CuO  79.55  99.0  27.7  Monoclinic  a = 0.4682, b = 0.3428, c = 0.5130α = γ = 90.00, β = 99.41 

XPS of the samples were measured using an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy PHI5000 Versa Probe with monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). The C1s binding energy (284.8 eV) of carbon contamination was used as a calibration to compensate for charging effects. The computer program XPSPEAK Version 4.1 was used to fit the narrow-scan spectra of the O1s peaks after Shirley-type background subtraction.10 Narrow-scan spectra of O1s peaks were simulated using the symmetric Gaussian–Lorentzian product function.

It can be seen from Table I that the average crystallite size for BaTiO3 was greater than 100 nm so that surface effects are expected to be very weak. Fig. 1 shows the BaTiO3 O1s spectrum obtained by fitting with Gaussian–Lorentzian functions. It may be seen that the O1s spectrum can be fitted using three peaks with binding energies (BEs) of approximately 528.5, 530.7 and 532.6 eV. According to the interpretation proposed by Dupin et al,9 the lower BE peak is assigned to O2− ions, the middle BE peak to O1− ions, and the higher BE peak to OChem, chemically adsorbed oxygen on the surface. The fitting data for O1s spectrum for BaTiO3 are shown in the Table II. From the relative peak areas of the main components, it can be deduced that the content ratio between O1− ions and O2− ions is approximately equal to 0.418/0.509 = 0.45/0.55. Here, we neglect the chemically adsorbed oxygen on the surface. Therefore, we obtain the average valence of the O anion, ValO, for BaTiO3 as being −1.55. This value is close to the value (−1.63) calculated by Cohen using density functional theory (DFT).1 

FIG. 1.

O1s photoelectron spectrum with fitting results for BaTiO3.

FIG. 1.

O1s photoelectron spectrum with fitting results for BaTiO3.

Close modal
TABLE II.

Fitting results for O1s photoelectron spectra for BaTiO3 and several monoxide samples. According to the view proposed by Dupin et al,9 the lower BE (binding energy) peak is assigned to O2− ions, the middle BE peak to O1− ions, and the higher BE peak to OChem, chemically adsorbed oxygen on the surface.

Composition Peak Position (eV) FWHMa (eV) Peak area (%)
BaTiO3  528.48  1.55  50.9 
  530.68  2.10  41.8 
  532.62  1.67  7.20 
CaO  530.65  1.90  87.1 
  532.15  1.55  12.0 
  533.60  1.05  0.90 
MnO  529.25  1.45  66.3 
  530.80  1.52  27.4 
  532.04  1.62  6.30 
CoO  529.25  1.56  62.4 
  530.95  1.79  26.9 
  532.60  1.99  10.7 
ZnO  529.60  1.21  64.7 
  531.20  1.87  31.4 
  532.95  1.27  4.00 
NiO  528.70  1.07  67.2 
  530.50  1.50  29.5 
  532.13  1.30  3.30 
CuO  529.85  1.95  51.8 
  531.70  1.90  40.5 
  533.35  1.79  7.70 
Composition Peak Position (eV) FWHMa (eV) Peak area (%)
BaTiO3  528.48  1.55  50.9 
  530.68  2.10  41.8 
  532.62  1.67  7.20 
CaO  530.65  1.90  87.1 
  532.15  1.55  12.0 
  533.60  1.05  0.90 
MnO  529.25  1.45  66.3 
  530.80  1.52  27.4 
  532.04  1.62  6.30 
CoO  529.25  1.56  62.4 
  530.95  1.79  26.9 
  532.60  1.99  10.7 
ZnO  529.60  1.21  64.7 
  531.20  1.87  31.4 
  532.95  1.27  4.00 
NiO  528.70  1.07  67.2 
  530.50  1.50  29.5 
  532.13  1.30  3.30 
CuO  529.85  1.95  51.8 
  531.70  1.90  40.5 
  533.35  1.79  7.70 
a

FWHM=full width at half maxima.

In order to show that O1s spectra measured by XPS can be used to estimate ValO, we also analyzed the O1s spectra for the monoxides CaO, MnO, CoO, ZnO, NiO and CuO, as shown in Fig. 2. Following a procedure similar to the above analysis for BaTiO3, the values for the O1s peak positions and areas were obtained as shown in Table II. The values for ValO, fi and the second ionization energies, V(M2+), of the metal ions in these monoxides are shown in Table III. In addition, the values of fi and V(M2+) for the SrO, CaO, MgO and BeO as reported by Phillips2 are shown in Table III.

FIG. 2.

O1s photoelectron spectra with fitting results for the monoxides CaO (a), MnO (b), CoO (c), ZnO (d), NiO (e) and CuO (f).

FIG. 2.

O1s photoelectron spectra with fitting results for the monoxides CaO (a), MnO (b), CoO (c), ZnO (d), NiO (e) and CuO (f).

Close modal
TABLE III.

The average valence of oxygen, ValO, and the ionicity, fi, measured using XPS in this work and as reported by Phillips2 for monoxides. V(M2+) is second ionization energy of the M cations.

Measured using XPS in this work Reported by Phillips2 
Monoxides MO V(M2+) (eV) ValO fi Monoxides MO V(M2+) (eV) fi
CaO  11.87  −1.879  0.940  SrO  11.03  0.926 
MnO  15.64  −1.707  0.854  CaO  11.87  0.913 
CoO  17.06  −1.699  0.849  MgO  15.04  0.841 
ZnO  17.96  −1.673  0.837  BeO  18.21  0.785 
NiO  18.17  −1.695  0.847       
CuO  20.29  −1.560  0.780       
Measured using XPS in this work Reported by Phillips2 
Monoxides MO V(M2+) (eV) ValO fi Monoxides MO V(M2+) (eV) fi
CaO  11.87  −1.879  0.940  SrO  11.03  0.926 
MnO  15.64  −1.707  0.854  CaO  11.87  0.913 
CoO  17.06  −1.699  0.849  MgO  15.04  0.841 
ZnO  17.96  −1.673  0.837  BeO  18.21  0.785 
NiO  18.17  −1.695  0.847       
CuO  20.29  −1.560  0.780       

The data in Table III are also presented in Fig. 3. It can be seen that values of fi decrease linearly with increasing V(M2+) and that the two lines are close to each other. The reason for the dependence on V(M2+) can be understood as follows: The second electron affinity energy of oxygen is 8.08 eV, while the second ionization energies of the metal cations are significantly higher, between 11.87 and 20.29 eV for these oxides. One would expect that these properties of the free atoms must affect how ions gain and lose electrons in oxides. The result is that for a cation with higher V(M2+), it is more difficult to lose a second electron and hence that the ionicity of the material decreases.

FIG. 3.

The dependence of the ionicities fi, measured in this work and reported by Phillips2 on the second ionization energies V(M2+) of the cations. See Table III.

FIG. 3.

The dependence of the ionicities fi, measured in this work and reported by Phillips2 on the second ionization energies V(M2+) of the cations. See Table III.

Close modal

The cation XPS spectra for our samples are shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that there are no obvious satellite peaks indicative of other valence states in these spectra. We therefore can not obtain the ionicities using these metal ionic photoelectron spectra.

FIG. 4.

Photoelectron spectra of the metal ions for BaTiO3 (a), (b) and the monoxides CaO (c), MnO (d), CoO (e), ZnO (f), NiO (g) and CuO (h).

FIG. 4.

Photoelectron spectra of the metal ions for BaTiO3 (a), (b) and the monoxides CaO (c), MnO (d), CoO (e), ZnO (f), NiO (g) and CuO (h).

Close modal

Taking into account that there are O1− ions present and that the ionicity in the oxides is less than unity, many unresolved physical problems can be understood. For example, taking into account the ionicity and the constraints imposed by Hund’s rules, our group proposed an O2p itinerant electron model. Using this model, it was explained why the variations in the magnetic moments as a function of the doping level in Cr, Mn and Ti doped (A)[B]2O4 spinel ferrites are different from the changes seen in Fe, Co, Ni and Cu doped spinel ferrites.11–19 The O2p itinerant electron model is based on three postulates:19 (i) There are O2p holes in the outer orbits of the O1− anions. In a given sublattice, an O2p electron of the O2− ion with constant spin direction can hop to the O2p hole of an adjacent O1− ions via a metal cation. (ii) The two O2p electrons in the outer orbit of an O2− anion, which have opposite spin directions, become itinerant electrons in the two different sublattices (the (A) or [B] sites). (iii) In a given sublattice, constrained by Hund’s rules and by the fact that an itinerant electron has constant spin direction, the magnetic moment directions of cations with 3d electron number, nd ≤ 4 (such as Cr3+, Cr2+, and Mn3+), are antiparallel to those of the cations with nd ≥ 5 (such as Mn2+ or divalent and trivalent Fe, Co, and Ni cations) whether at the (A) sites or the [B] sites.

Experimental evidence for the existence of O2p itinerant electron in oxides has been reported recently by Suzuki et al.20 They studied the spinel compound, LixMn2O4, a lithium ion battery cathode material, using high-resolution x-ray Compton scattering. They found that the itinerant electrons migrate through the material mainly via the intermediary of O2p orbitals during battery operation and that manganese 3d states are shown delocalization only involving 0.16 ± 0.05 electrons per Mn sites.

In summary, the content ratios O1−/ O2− for oxygen anions in metal oxides were obtained by fitting O1s photoelectron spectra with Gaussian–Lorentzian functions. We then obtained the average valence (ValO) of oxygen anions and the ionicity, fi = |ValO|/2. It was found that the estimated fi for BaTiO3 is close to the value calculated by Cohen and that the dependence of fi on the second ionization energy of the metal cation obtained in this work for the monoxides is close to that reported by Phillips. We therefore suggest that O1s photoelectron spectrum measurements can be used as a general experimental method for estimating the ionicity of oxides.

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, under Contract No.NSF-11174069, the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. A2015205111), the Key item Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. 10965125D) and the Young scholar Science Foundation of the Education Department of Hebei Province (QN20131008). The authors wish to thank Dr. Norm Davison for helpful discussion.

1.
Ronald E.
cohen
,
Nature
358
,
136
(
1992
).
2.
J. C.
Phillips
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
42
,
317
(
1970
).
3.
J.
Thomas
and
I.
Pollini
,
Phys. Rev. B
32
,
2522
(
1985
).
4.
J. R.
Chelikowsky
and
J. K.
Burdett
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
56
,
961
(
1986
).
5.
A.
García
and
M. L.
Cohen
,
Phys. Rev. B
47
,
4215
(
1993
).
6.
B.
Balamurugan
,
B. R.
Mehta
, and
S. M.
Shivaprasad
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
79
,
3176
(
2001
).
7.
G.E.
Arif
,
Y.A.
Douri
,
F.A.
Abdullah
, and
R.
Khenata
,
Superlattices and Microstructures
53
,
24
(
2013
).
8.
P.
Ascarelli
and
G.
Moretti
,
Surface and Interface Analysis
7
,
8
(
1985
).
9.
Jean-Charles
Dupin
,
Danielle
Gonbeau
,
Philippe
Vinatier
, and
Alain
Levasseur
,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2
,
1319
(
2000
).
10.
M. P.
Seah
and
M. T.
Brown
,
Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena
95
,
71
(
1998
).
11.
D. H.
Ji
,
G. D.
Tang
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
X.
Hou
,
Q. J.
Han
,
W. H.
Qi
,
R. R.
Bian
, and
S. R.
Liu
,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
326
,
197
(
2013
).
12.
L. L.
Lang
,
J.
Xu
,
W. H.
Qi
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
G. D.
Tang
,
Z. F.
Shang
,
X. Y.
Zhang
,
L. Q.
Wu
, and
L. C.
Xue
,
J. Appl. Phys.
116
,
123901
(
2014
).
13.
G. D.
Tang
,
Q. J.
Han
,
J.
Xu
,
D. H.
Ji
,
W. H.
Qi
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
Z. F.
Shang
, and
X. Y.
Zhang
,
Physica B.
438
,
91
(
2014
).
14.
Z. F.
Shang
,
W. H.
Qi
,
D. H.
Ji
,
J.
Xu
,
G. D.
Tang
,
X. Y.
Zhang
,
Z. Z.
Li
, and
L. L.
Lang
,
Chin. Phys. B.
23
,
107503
(
2014
).
15.
X. Y.
Zhang
,
J.
Xu
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
W. H.
Qi
,
G. D.
Tang
,
Z. F.
Shang
,
D. H.
Ji
, and
L.L.
Lang
,
Physica B.
446
,
92
(
2014
).
16.
J.
Xu
,
D. H.
Ji
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
W. H.
Qi
,
G. D.
Tang
,
X. Y.
Zhang
,
Z. F.
Shang
, and
L. L.
Lang
,
Phys. Status Solidi B.
252
,
411
(
2015
).
17.
L. L.
Lang
,
J.
Xu
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
W. H.
Qi
,
G. D.
Tang
,
Z. F.
Shang
,
X.Y.
Zhang
,
L. Q.
Wu
, and
L. C.
Xue
,
Physica B.
462
,
47
(
2015
).
18.
G. D.
Tang
,
Z. F.
Shang
,
X. Y.
Zhang
,
J.
Xu
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
C. M.
Zhen
,
W. H.
Qi
, and
L. L.
Lang
,
Physica B.
463
,
26
(
2015
).
19.
J.
Xu
,
L.
Ma
,
Z. Z.
Li
,
L.L.
Lang
,
W. H.
Qi
,
G. D.
Tang
,
L.Q.
Wu
,
L.C.
Xue
, and
G.H.
Wu
,
Phys. Status Solidi B.
(
2015
), published online (Aug, 2015), DOI 10.1002/pssb.201552260.
20.
K.
Suzuki
,
B.
Barbiellini
,
Y.
Orikasa
,
N.
Go
,
H.
Sakurai
,
S.
Kaprzyk
,
M.
Itou
,
K.
Yamamoto
,
Y.
Uchimoto
,
Yung Jui
Wang
,
H.
Hafiz
,
A.
Bansil
, and
Y.
Sakurai
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
114
,
087401
(
2015
).