Amorphous Ge-rich Si1−xGex films with local Ge-clustering were deposited by dual-source jet-type inductively coupled plasma chemical-vapor deposition (jet-ICPCVD). The structural evolution of the deposited films annealed at various temperatures (Ta) is investigated. Experimental results indicate that the crystallization occurs to form Ge and Si clusters as Ta = 500 °C. With raising Ta up to 900 °C, Ge clusters percolate together and Si diffuses and redistributes to form a Ge/SiGe core/shell structure, and some Ge atoms partially diffuse to the surface as a result of segregation. The present work will be helpful in understanding the structural evolution process of a hybrid SiGe films and beneficial for further optimizing the microstructure and properties.

Extensive works on nanocrystalline Si (nc-Si)1,2 and Ge (nc-Ge)3,4 film materials have been conducted for more than two decades. Increasing attentions have been given to nc-Si1−xGex film,5–7 which shows numerous potential applications, such as transistors,8,9 photovoltaic10 and infrared detection,11 due to its tunable optoelectronic properties. It is most significant to understand and control the microstructures of nc-Si1−xGex films. Plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) technology, where high density plasmas serves as an effective source to provide enough ions and radicals, has been most widely used in fabricating of semiconductor films. S. Oda et al. demonstrated the controllable nucleation and growth of nc-Si by adjusting time of pulsed plasma.12,13 Kortshagen’s work suggested that the residence time (the time during which the source gas travel through the plasma region) is one of the most important factors which affect the size and property of the fabricated nanocrystals.14 Lots of works on the formations of nc-Si1−xGex alloy suggested that it usually consists of hybrid crystalline structures, and more complex than that of nc-Si.15–18 Y.M. Yang et al. adjusted the proportion of Ge and Si sources in magnetron sputtering and obtained the complex films containing various crystalline structures, namely, Ge nanocrystals, Ge/SiGe core/shell, and nc-Si1−xGex alloy.19 Our previous work developed the deposition technique that combines very high-frequency inductively coupled plasma with gas-jet (jet-ICPCVD) in preparing amorphous and microcrystalline Si films.20 In the present work, we modified the jet-ICPCVD system by separating the inlet of the source gases to adjust the residence time of Ge and Si precursors, respectively, then deposited Ge-rich Si1−xGex films, and obtained Ge/SiGe core/shell nano-structure through further thermal annealing. On the basis of the experimental results of the microstructure characterizations, such as Raman, scanning electron microscope (SEM), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS), we reveal the structural evolution of the Ge-rich Si1−xGex films with a hybrid amorphous/microcrystalline structure in the annealing treatment process.

This work adopted dual-source jet-ICPCVD system to deposit Si1−xGex films on silicon and quartz substrates (FIG. 1). Germane (20% diluted in hydrogen) accessed the upper road entrance, dissociated, and excited completely after going through the plasma region, thereby producing a large number of Ge precursors. Silane (20% diluted in hydrogen) accessed the lower road entrance. The fraction of Ge and Si was controlled by the flow ratio of germane, silane, and hydrogen. In this work, the flow rates of germane, silane, and hydrogen were varied in the range of 2 to 8, 2 to 6, and 60 to 90 sccm, respectively. The pressure in the chamber was approximately 100 Pa. The thickness of the deposited films was about 1 μm estimated from the SEM cross-sectional observation. The isochronal and isothermal annealing treatments under a vacuum condition were conducted. The isochronal annealing temperatures (Ta) ranged from 300 °C to 900 °C. Raman spectroscopy (Horiba HR800, with a laser wavelength of 514.5 nm) and XRD (RigakuD/max 2500VL/PC) were used to analyze the crystallization, and EDS (Horiba EX-250) to obtain the components in the films.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the dual-source jet-ICPCVD system.

FIG. 1.

Schematic of the dual-source jet-ICPCVD system.

Close modal

FIG. 2(a) shows the Raman spectrum of the deposited Ge-rich Si1−xGex (x = 0.7) film through isochronal annealing treatments from 300 °C to 900 °C. No obvious peak is observed except for a broad band centered at ∼270 cm−1 when Ta is below 500°C. This fact implies that the as-deposited film is mainly amorphous. When Ta is about 500°C, the peaks located at 285, 396.5 and 465 cm−1 appear slightly. These peaks correspond to the optical phonon mode of Ge–Ge, Ge–Si, and Si–Si in the Si1−xGex alloy,21 respectively, thus indicating that nc-Si1−xGex begins to form. Heating the sample continuously, the related peak intensity is enhanced, and slight blue-shift occurs in all phonon modes. When Ta increases from 800 °C to 900 °C, the enhanced intensity and the less asymmetry of Ge-Ge mode indicate well crystallization of the film. The phenomena that the intensity of Ge-Ge mode increases whereas Si-Si mode nearly disappears suggest that the nanocrystals are locally Ge-rich, which is in agreement with similar reports.22,23 Simultaneously, three optical phonon modes show obvious frequency shift (Table I), where the Ge–Ge mode is blue-shift, the Ge–Si and Si–Si modes are red-shift. FIG. 2(b) gives the Raman spectrum of film samples after isothermal annealing at Ta = 900 °C. As the annealing time increases, the peak intensities and frequencies of the peaks in the Raman spectrum change obviously, reflecting the similar trend annealed from 800 °C to 900 °C. During the deposition process, with longer residence time, Ge precursors have much more chance to nucleate. Furthermore, theoretical simulations have revealed that there is a tendency for clustering of like-atom bonds in amorphous Si1−xGex alloy.24 We may imagine that there are a large number of Ge-rich regions in the as-deposited films, and when Ta reaches 500 °C, these Ge-rich regions act as centers of crystallization to form Ge clusters. For a hybrid-structured SiGe film where Si and Ge clusters co-exist in amorphous phase, C. Tzoumanekas et al. demonstrated that these clusters mutually penetrate with the decreasing structural disorder during crystallization and then fuse into the Si and Ge core.25 In the Ge-rich samples used in this work, Si atoms are much fewer and more easily spread. As a result, Si atoms diffuse preferentially and redistribute prior to forming the Ge/SiGe core/shell structure during the high-temperature annealing process. Obviously, the Ge core is affected by compress strain, meanwhile, the surrounding SiGe layer is affected by tensile stress. Consequently, the blue-shift in Ge-Ge mode where the red-shift in Ge-Si and Si-Si modes occurs, and the average frequency of red-shift is much larger than blue-shift considering the Ge-to-Si atomic ratio in the Ge-rich Si1−xGex films.

FIG. 2.

(a) Raman spectrum of Si1−xGex films after isochronal annealing for 300 s: Ta = 300 °C to 900 °C; (b) Raman spectrum of Si1−xGex films after isothermal annealing at 900 °C: t = 60 and 300 s.

FIG. 2.

(a) Raman spectrum of Si1−xGex films after isochronal annealing for 300 s: Ta = 300 °C to 900 °C; (b) Raman spectrum of Si1−xGex films after isothermal annealing at 900 °C: t = 60 and 300 s.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Frequencies of Ge–Ge, Ge–Si, and Si–Si modes in the Raman spectrum of Si1−xGex films after isochronal annealing for 300 s.

Ge–Ge (cm−1) Ge–Si (cm−1) Si–Si (cm−1)
Ta = 500°C  285  395.6  ∼465 
Ta = 600°C  286.5  397.6  ∼465 
Ta = 700°C  289.5  400  465.9 
Ta = 800°C  289.9  400  462 
Ta = 900°C  293.5  387.7  450 
Ge–Ge (cm−1) Ge–Si (cm−1) Si–Si (cm−1)
Ta = 500°C  285  395.6  ∼465 
Ta = 600°C  286.5  397.6  ∼465 
Ta = 700°C  289.5  400  465.9 
Ta = 800°C  289.9  400  462 
Ta = 900°C  293.5  387.7  450 

Phonon confinement is an important factor for Raman spectrum. According to the standard confinement model,26 the first-order Raman spectrum I(ω) can be described as

(1)

where q is expressed in units of 2π/a, d is the mean size, a is the lattice constant, Γ is natural linewidth (for Ge, aGe = 0.565 nm, Γ ≈ 3.5 cm−1 and ω0 = 300.5 cm−1). ω(q) is the dispersion relation for optical phonons in c-Ge which is given by

(2)

where A = 1.578 × 105 cm−2 and B = 1.000 × 105 cm−2. These parameters have been determined experimentally by neutron scattering.27 By using the above equations, we calculate the average size d of Ge clusters from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Ge-Ge mode, as shown in FIG. 3. One can see that grain size increases with Ta, in agreement with the previous reports.28 As a result, the Ge-Ge mode in Raman spectrum blue-shifts, which is a typical character of confinement effect.

FIG. 3.

FWHM of Ge–Ge mode and the calculated nanocrystal size of Si1−xGex films after isochronal annealing for 300 s.

FIG. 3.

FWHM of Ge–Ge mode and the calculated nanocrystal size of Si1−xGex films after isochronal annealing for 300 s.

Close modal

Furthermore, we analyze the crystallization of the Si1−xGex film and the variations of SiGe nanocrystal size during the annealing process by using XRD measurement. FIG. 4 shows the XRD spectrum of these samples. Three main peaks at 27.7°, 46.1°, and 54.5° are related to <111>, <220>, and <311> diffraction, respectively.29 When Ta increases from 600 °C to 700 °C, the intensity of the <111> peak is enhanced, thus showing that the crystallization rate of the film grows. This result is consistent with the Raman measurement result in FIG. 2(a). Table II lists the <111> FWHM of samples in different Ta. The FWHM decreased at Ta = 700 °C, indicating that both the crystallization rate and grain size increase. However, it is noted that the FWHM does not change obviously with increasing Ta continuously, which is not fit with the Raman result. The discrepancy may be attributed to the different depth of detection between XRD and Raman measurements. In general, the XRD characterize the whole thickness of the film, whereas the Raman reflect only a certain thickness (tens nm) beneath the surface.

FIG. 4.

XRD spectrum of the Si1−xGex film after isochronal annealing for 300 s.

FIG. 4.

XRD spectrum of the Si1−xGex film after isochronal annealing for 300 s.

Close modal
TABLE II.

FWHM of <111> peak in the XRD spectrum of the Si1−xGex films after isochronal annealing for 300 s.

Ta (°C) 600°C 700°C 800°C 900°C
FWHM<111> (nm)  0.042  0.023  0.025  0.025 
Ta (°C) 600°C 700°C 800°C 900°C
FWHM<111> (nm)  0.042  0.023  0.025  0.025 

In the deposition and annealing process of Si1−xGex alloy, Ge atoms partially migrate to the sample surface, because the covalent bond of Ge is longer and its surface energy is lower than those of Si.30–32 To determine the atom concentrations of Si and Ge in the sub-surface of the films, we conducted EDS measurements on the samples. The EDS effective depth is approximately 100 nm on the basis of the electron accelerating voltage. FIG. 5 gives the dependence of the composition in the sub-surfaces of these samples on Ta. When Ta is below 900 °C, the atom concentrations of Ge and Si show no obvious changes. When Ta increases up to 900 °C, however, the Ge fraction increases from 67% to 73%. Measurement results suggest that the annealing at Ta ≥ 900 °C would induce the Ge atoms to segregate and partially diffuse toward the surface owing to the lower surface energy.33 Consequently, higher fraction of Ge causes the increases for the frequency and intensity of the Ge–Ge mode, and decrease for those of the Si–Si mode.

FIG. 5.

Si and Ge atom concentrations in the sub-surface of the Si1−xGex film as a function of annealing temperature Ta.

FIG. 5.

Si and Ge atom concentrations in the sub-surface of the Si1−xGex film as a function of annealing temperature Ta.

Close modal

To visually dipict the structural evolution of samples in annealing process, we give a schematic of the film section (FIG. 6). As-deposited SiGe films are mainly amorphous phase, simultaneously, and large amounts of Si and Ge-rich (mostly Ge-rich) regions are embedded in the amorphous SiGe matrix. As Ta increases up to 500 °C, the film begins to crystallize and form Si and Ge clusters (FIG. 6(a)). With raising Ta continually, the size of nanocrystals grows and the intensities of all phonon modes in the Raman spectrum increase (FIG. 6(b)). Due to the influence of confinement effect, the frequency blue-shifts slightly. When Ta = 900 °C, Ge clusters merge into Ge cores, whereas Si disperse in SiGe shells around the Ge cores (FIG. 6(c)). At the same time, the Ge atoms partially diffuse to the surface. These structural evolutions result in the increases for the frequency and intensity of Ge–Ge phonon mode, meanwhile, the decrease for the frequencies and intensities of both the Ge–Si and Si–Si phonon modes.

FIG. 6.

Schematic diagrams of Si1−xGex film section: (a) Ta = 500 °C; (b) Ta = 700 °C; (c) Ta = 900 °C annealing.

FIG. 6.

Schematic diagrams of Si1−xGex film section: (a) Ta = 500 °C; (b) Ta = 700 °C; (c) Ta = 900 °C annealing.

Close modal

A dual-sources Jet-ICPCVD technique has been used to deposit Si1−xGex films at low temperatures. By separating the inlets of germane and silane, different residence time of Ge and Si precursors is obtained. Ge precursors get longer residence time than that of Si precursors, and have more change to nucleate consequently. As a result, there are a large number of Ge-rich regions in the as-deposited films. When Ta reaches 500 °C, Si1−xGex films crystallize and the Ge-rich regions act as crystallization centers to form Ge clusters. As raising Ta continually, the size of the nanocrystals increases and a transformation from clusters to composite nanocrystals with Ge core and SiGe shell is revealed. The formed core/shell structure induces the interact strain between the Ge core and the Ge-Si shell. When Ta increases up to 900 °C, part of Ge atoms diffuse to the film surface as a result of segregation. The confinement effect, strain and fraction change are discussed as the factors which cause the frequency shifts of the Raman phonon modes. The present work can help us understand the formation of nc-Si1−xGex nanostructures and guide us in further exploring their applications.

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant Nos. 2013CB932900 and 2011CB922100, NSFC under Grant Nos. 61205057 and 61204050, and NSFJS under Grant Nos. BK2011011 and BK20130055.

1.
K. Y.
Cheng
,
R.
Anthony
,
U. R.
Kortshagen
, and
R. J.
Holmes
,
Nano Lett
11
,
1952
(
2011
).
2.
X. L.
Wu
,
Y. F.
Mei
,
G. G.
Siu
,
K. L.
Wong
,
K.
Moulding
,
M. J.
Stokes
,
C. L.
Fu
, and
X. M.
Bao
,
Phys Rev Lett
86
,
3000
(
2001
).
3.
Z. C.
Holman
and
U. R.
Kortshagen
,
Nanotechnology
21
,
335302
(
2010
).
4.
B.
Ghosh
,
Y.
Sakka
, and
N.
Shirahata
,
J Mater Chem A
1
,
3747
(
2013
).
5.
H. C.
Weissker
,
J.
Furthmuller
, and
F.
Bechstedt
,
Phys Rev Lett
90
,
085501
(
2003
).
6.
L. Z.
Liu
,
X. L.
Wu
,
F.
Gao
,
Y. M.
Yang
,
T. H.
Li
, and
P. K.
Chu
,
Opt Lett
35
,
1022
(
2010
).
7.
S.
Kim
,
C.
Park
,
J. C.
Lee
,
J. S.
Cho
, and
Y.
Kim
,
Thin Solid Films
534
,
214
(
2013
).
8.
D. L.
Harame
,
J. H.
Comfort
,
J. D.
Cressler
,
E. F.
Crabbe
,
J. Y. C.
Sun
,
B. S.
Meyerson
, and
T.
Tice
,
Ieee T Electron Dev
42
,
455
(
1995
).
9.
R.
Akis
and
D. K.
Ferry
,
J Vac Sci Technol B
23
,
1821
(
2005
).
10.
B. J.
Yan
,
L.
Zhao
,
B. D.
Zhao
,
J. W.
Chen
,
G. H.
Wang
,
H. W.
Diao
,
Y. L.
Mao
, and
W. J.
Wang
,
Vacuum
89
,
43
(
2013
).
11.
A.
Torres
,
M.
Moreno
,
A.
Kosarev
, and
A.
Heredia
,
Journal Of Non-Crystalline Solids
354
,
2556
(
2008
).
12.
T.
Ifuku
,
M.
Otobe
,
A.
Itoh
, and
S.
Oda
,
Jpn J Appl Phys 1
36
,
4031
(
1997
).
13.
K.
Ikemoto
,
Y.
Nakamine
,
Y.
Kawano
, and
S.
Oda
,
Jpn J Appl Phys
53
(
2014
).
14.
L.
Mangolini
,
E.
Thimsen
, and
U.
Kortshagen
,
Nano Lett
5
,
655
(
2005
).
15.
Y.
Nishino
,
S.
Muramatsu
,
Y.
Takano
, and
H.
Kajiyama
,
Physical review. B, Condensed matter
38
,
1942
(
1988
).
16.
A.
Kolobov
,
H.
Oyanagi
,
N.
Usami
,
S.
Tokumitsu
,
T.
Hattori
,
S.
Yamasaki
,
K.
Tanaka
,
S.
Ohtake
, and
Y.
Shiraki
,
Applied Physics Letters
80
,
488
(
2002
).
17.
C.
Tetelin
,
X.
Wallart
,
D.
Stievenard
,
J. P.
Nys
, and
D. J.
Gravesteijn
,
J Vac Sci Technol B
16
,
137
(
1998
).
18.
M. J.
Wu
,
H. C.
Wen
,
T. Y.
Chiang
,
C. H.
Tsai
,
W. K.
Hsu
, and
C. P.
Chou
,
Appl Surf Sci
258
,
5001
(
2012
).
19.
Y. M.
Yang
,
X. L.
Wu
,
G. G.
Siu
,
G. S.
Huang
,
J. C.
Shen
, and
D. S.
Hu
,
Journal Of Applied Physics
96
,
5239
(
2004
).
20.
Z. W.
Zuo
,
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Lu
,
J. Z. A.
Wang
,
L.
Pu
,
Y.
Shi
, and
Y. D.
Zheng
,
Vacuum
86
,
924
(
2012
).
21.
M. I.
Alonso
and
K.
Winer
,
Physical review. B, Condensed matter
39
,
10056
(
1989
).
22.
C.
Mehringer
,
C.
Kloner
,
B.
Butz
,
B.
Winter
,
E.
Spiecker
, and
W.
Peukert
,
Nanoscale
7
,
5186
(
2015
).
23.
C. W.
Lin
,
S. Y.
Lin
,
S. C.
Lee
, and
C. T.
Chia
,
Journal Of Applied Physics
91
,
2322
(
2002
).
24.
C.
Tzoumanekas
and
P. C.
Kelires
,
Journal Of Non-Crystalline Solids
266
,
670
(
2000
).
25.
C.
Tzoumanekas
and
P. C.
Kelires
,
Physical Review B
60
,
14205
(
1999
).
26.
H.
Richter
,
Z. P.
Wang
, and
L.
Ley
,
Solid State Commun
39
,
6259
(
1981
).
27.
R.
Tubino
,
G.
Zerbi
, and
L.
Piseri
,
J Chem Phys
56
,
1022
(
1972
).
28.
M.
Fujii
,
S.
Hayashi
, and
K.
Yamamoto
,
Applied Physics Letters
57
,
2692
(
1990
).
29.
X. D.
Pi
and
U.
Kortshagen
,
Nanotechnology
20
,
295602
(
2009
).
30.
K.
Sumitomo
,
Y.
Kobayashi
,
T.
Ito
, and
T.
Ogino
,
Thin Solid Films
357
,
76
(
1999
).
31.
S. J.
Kahng
,
Y. H.
Ha
,
D. W.
Moon
, and
Y.
Kuk
,
Applied Physics Letters
77
,
981
(
2000
).
32.
H.
Miyata
,
T.
Yamada
, and
D. K.
Ferry
,
Applied Physics Letters
62
,
2661
(
1993
).
33.
Z.
Zhang
,
J. S.
Pan
,
J.
Zhang
, and
E. S.
Tok
,
Phys Chem Chem Phys
12
,
7171
(
2010
).