The superposition of the Green's function and its time reversal can be extracted from the photoacoustic point sources applying the representation theorems of the convolution and correlation type. It is shown that photoacoustic pressure waves at locations of random point sources can be calculated with the solution of the photoacoustic wave equation and utilization of the continuity and the discontinuity conditions of the pressure waves in the frequency domain although the pressure waves cannot be measured at these locations directly. Therefore, with the calculated pressure waves at the positions of the sources, the spectral power density can be obtained for any system consisting of two random point sources. The methodology presented here can also be generalized to any finite number of point like sources. The physical application of this study includes the utilization of the cross-correlation of photoacoustic waves to extract functional information associated with the flow dynamics inside the tissue.

The photoacoustic phenomena was described by Alexander Graham Bell in 1881 but its application as an imaging method has attracted much attention after the improvement of the laser, computer and transducer technologies.1–17 Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) uses absorption of the electromagnetic energy as a contrast mechanism to analyze the system.13 In PAI, a short pulsed laser is sent to tissue to obtain an acoustic impulse response. The tissue absorbs the laser energy and then the absorbed light leads to thermal expansion generating a pressure wave. The propagating photoacoustic wave is received by a detector called as a transducer. Due to the transducer and the signal processing, the absorption profile of the tissue composition is obtained.1,2 Applications of PAI range from tissue and molecular imaging to clinical medicine and biology.18 

It is well known that in acoustics, the cross-correlation of observed waves due to the excited random sources can yield the extraction of the Green's function.19,20 For example, Snieder obtained the Green's function from the diffusive and the acoustic waves due to sources described by the Dirac delta functions.20,21 This method is also utilized when the sources are placed inside a domain or on its surface.20 

Obtaining the Green's function by the correlation of the waves resulting from the randomly distributed sources has attracted much intention. The representation theorems of the correlation and convolution types, and time reversal invariance provide the utilization of the method. On the other hand, the formalism does not require time reversal invariance necessarily. For example, Snieder obtained the Green's function for the diffusive medium.21 There are a lot of applications of this technique in the fields of ultrasound,21–28 exploration seismology,21,29,30 structural engineering,31,32 numerical modeling,33 and crustal seismology.21,23–25,34

In this work, the superposition of the Green's function and its complex conjugate (time reversal counterpart) is retrieved from the correlation of photoacoustic waves excited by random point sources inside the volume. The formalism presented here makes it possible to obtain the photoacoustic pressure waves at the positions of the random sources and the power density spectrum of the photoacoustic system in the frequency domain.

The value of this study roots from the fact that the cross-correlation measurements can be used to retrieve functional information related to the flow dynamics inside the tissue. For example, J. Brunker and P. Beard35 quantify Doppler time shifts using the cross-correlation of photoacoustic signals. Then, using the measured time shifts, they estimate the velocity of the red blood cells. The motivation behind the use of the cross-correlations is that the motion of the red blood cells cause fluctuations in the photoacoustic signal. It is also very important to note that red blood cells inside the blood can be modeled as randomly distributed (spatially uncorrelated) point sources.36 

The photoacoustic wave equation is given by

(1)

Here p(r, t) is the solution of the equation representing a photoacoustic wave. β, κ, vS and T(r, t) stand for the thermal coefficient of volume expansion, the isothermal compressibility the speed of sound, and the rise in temperature at position r and time t, respectively.1,37

If the acoustic confinement and thermal confinement conditions are satisfied, then the photoacoustic wave equation takes the following form

(2)

Defining

(3)

Eq. (2) becomes

(4)

The convolution type of the representation theorem20,38,39 can be obtained from the integral

(5)

Here pA and pB represent the photoacoustic waves resulting from source terms

$\frac{\beta }{C_{P}} s_A$
βCPsA and
$\frac{\beta }{C_{P}} s_B$
βCPsB
, respectively and Ei is the Fourier transform of the photoacoustic wave equation.

Using the Fourier transformation, f(r, t) = ∫f(r, w)eiwtdω, for p and s gives

(6)

in the frequency domain, ω.

The adjoint of Eq. (6) is

(7)

where * represents complex conjugation.

Substituting the Fourier transformation of the photoacoustic wave equation in Eq. (5) leads to obtaining an expression for the representation theorem of the convolution type

(8)

Evaluation of the following integral provides an expression for the representation theorem of the correlation type

(9)

where Ei and Qi are the Fourier transform and the adjoint of the Fourier transform of the photoacoustic wave equation, respectively. Substituting Eqs. (6) and (7) in the correlation type20,38,39 integral leads to

(10)

For a laser pulse, the temporal and space parts of the source can be considered the Dirac delta function.1 Calasso et al. studied the photoacoustic effect resulted from heat deposition at a point in an inviscid fluid describing the source term in the wave equation by the Dirac Delta function to determine the fluid motion.40 For this reason, setting

(11)

and writing si into

(12)

gives

(13)

Inserting these si and pi states into Eq. (8) leads to

(14)

Using the product rule for differentiation

(15)

and applying Gauss's theorem, Eq. (14) takes the following form

(16)

Following similar steps, the correlation type integral is obtained

(17)

Assuming that S is a sphere with a sufficiently large radius,41,42 the gradient of G is approximated by

(18)

where the Green's function for the Helmholtz equation is

(19)

and n is the unit vector pointing in the positive r direction. The surface integral on the right hand side of Eq. (16) is zero20 so that the reciprocity provides

(20)

Writing Eq. (18) Eq. (17) and using the reciprocity, the representation theorem of the correlation type leads to

(21)

In order to express the right hand side of Eq. (21) in three dimensions, we integrate Eq. (21) over the radius of the sphere r, which is now treated as a variable, between 0 and R. Here, R is greater than rA and rB (R > rA, B > 0). In this way, the integration of the surface integral over r leads to a volume integral. The integral on the left hand side of Eq. (21) becomes

(22)

and the integral on the right hand side of Eq. (21) becomes

(23)

Note that the radius of the sphere, r, varies from 0 to R. In fact, the surface integral in Eq. (21) is obtained by the far field approximation. On the other hand, in the near field, r ∼ 0, the contributions of the surface integrals in Eq. (17) are very small because of the fact that the terms ∇G(r, rA) and ∇G*(r, rB) fluctuate randomly and the total contribution from these integrals can be neglected. For this reason, the volume integral in Eq. (23) contributes significantly in the far field and it can be omitted in the near field. Therefore, we assume that the radius of the sphere ranges from zero to R.

Hence, in three dimensions, Eq. (21) can be generalized to the following expression

(24)

Consider spatially uncorrelated random point sources at different location inside the sphere of radius R with the following relation21 

(25)

in order to obtain a relation between the casual and the acasual Green's functions from the correlation of the solutions of the photoacoustic wave equation generated by the random point sources where ∣s(ω)∣2 and brackets represent the power spectrum of the point sources and the expectation value, respectively.

Multiplying Eq. (24) with the power spectrum ∣s(ω)∣2 gives

(26)
(27)
(28)

and then

(29)

Here p(rA, ω) and p(rB, ω) are the pressure waves at rA and rB resulting from point source B at rB and point source A at rA, respectively. Eq. (29) states that the multiplication of the superposition of the Green's function and its adjoint with the power spectrum of the excitation can be written in terms of the correlation of the photoacoustic waves at rA and rB, respectively.

The Green's functions for Eqs. (6) and (7) are given by the following expressions

(30)

and

(31)

respectively. Writing expressions (30) and (31) into Eq. (29), the power density spectrum takes its final form

(32)

Note that rA and rB are the point source locations. It seems that it is impossible to measure p(rA, ω) and p*(rB, ω) corresponding to the photoacoustic pressure waves at the locations of the point sources A and B, respectively, via detectors. In order to obtain these pressure waves, a method is presented in the next section. Eq. (32) states that the spectral power density of the system can be obtained correlating the calculated photoacoustic pressure waves at different locations due to the random excitation. Therefore, the impulse response of photoacoustic systems can be obtained utilizing the method presented in the next section and the representation theorems of the convolution type and the correlation type.

M. A. Anastasio et al. studied the photoacoustic tomography (PAT) reconstruction problem in the frequency domain with inverse source concepts.43 They also obtained a mathematical expression between the photoacoustic data and the optical absorption distribution in the frequency domain. In this work, the inverse problem dealt with is obtaining the pressure waves at the sources' locations from the measurements of the photoacoustic pressure waves on a spherical surface surrounding sources different from Anastasio's work.43 In this work, point sources are considered volume sources not at the bounding surface. Reconstruction of the absorption map of the tissue is the inverse problem in PAT.43 

A pressure wave, p(r), can be measured via a transducer at a position of r. For two point sources at r1 and r2 lying in the same direction in which polar coordinate θ = 0 (or x = 0 and y = 0 line), the Fourier transformation of the photoacoustic wave equation in frequency domain leads to

(33)

When rri, Eq. (33) reduces to Helmholtz equation. For azimuthal symmetry, the general solution of Helmholtz equation in spherical coordinates is

(34)

where μ = cos θ, Pl(μ) is the Legendre function and

$j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)$
jl(ωvSr) and
$n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S}r)$
nl(ωvSr)
are the spherical Bessel and the spherical Neumann functions, respectively.

At the position of the trancducer r = R1, we take the general solution of Eq. (33) with r ∈ [ri, R1]. Hence, the experimental p(R1, t) in ω,

$\tilde{p}({\bf R}_1, \omega )= \tilde{p}(R_1, \mu ^{{\prime }}, \omega )$
p̃(R1,ω)=p̃(R1,μ,ω)⁠, can be written as

(35)

In order to find al and bl, another pressure wave needs to be measured at a different location, r = R2, so that

(36)

Multiplying Eqs. (35) and (36) with

$P_{l^{\prime }}(\mu {^{\prime }})$
Pl(μ) and then integrating with respect to μ′ leads to

(37)

and

(38)

where the orthogonality relation of the Legendre polynomials

$\int _{-1}^{1} P_{l^{\prime }}(\mu {^{\prime }}) P_l(\mu ^{{\prime }}) d\mu ^{{\prime }}=\frac{2}{2l+1} \delta _ {ll^{{\prime }}}$
11Pl(μ)Pl(μ)dμ=22l+1δll is used.

Solving Eqs. (37) and (38) gives

(39)

and

(40)

where

(41)

and the detector is assumed to be capable of measuring all possible azimuthal angles at a fixed radius.

The solution between the point sources, r ∈ [r1, r2], is

(42)

The continuity of the pressure wave at the locations of Dirac delta point sources, r = ri, requires

(43)

For azimuthal symmetry, the Laplacian takes the following form

(44)

where the Laplace-Beltrami operator,44–46 ΩLB, is given by

(45)

for three dimensions.

Writing the Laplacian and

$\tilde{p}(r, \mu , \omega )= \sum _{l=0}^\infty f_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r) P_l(\mu )$
p̃(r,μ,ω)=l=0fl(ωvSr)Pl(μ) into Eq. (33) leads to

(46)

where

$f_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S}r)=[j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r), n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S}r)]$
fl(ωvSr)=[jl(ωvSr),nl(ωvSr)]⁠. For two point sources case, in order to obtain a discontinuity equation of the derivative of the pressure wave, we multiply Eq. (46) with
$r^2 P_{l^{{\prime }}}(\mu =\cos \theta )$
r2Pl(μ=cosθ)
and integrate between (r = ri − ε, θ = 0) and (r = ri + ε, θ = π) with respect to r and cos θ. Considering ε → 0+ and using the continuity of the pressure wave leads to

(47)

Setting

(48)
(49)

ε → 0+ and making use of the continuity of the pressure wave, Eq. (47) becomes

(50)

Here, we define

$\tilde{p}_1(r, \mu , \omega )$
p̃1(r,μ,ω) is the pressure wave between the point sources and
$\tilde{p}_2(r, \mu , \omega )$
p̃2(r,μ,ω)
is the pressure wave at the rightmost region (near the detector).

Writing

$\tilde{p}_1(r, \mu , \omega )$
p̃1(r,μ,ω) and
$\tilde{p}_2(r, \mu , \omega )$
p̃2(r,μ,ω)
into Eqs. (43) and (50), the following equations are obtained

(51)

and

(52)

where prime represent differentiation with respect to r.

Solving Eqs. (51) and (52) for cl and dl in terms of al and bl gives

(53)
(54)

and

(55)
(56)

where

$W[j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r_2),n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S}r_2)] = \frac{1}{\frac{\omega }{v_S} (r_2)^2}$
W[jl(ωvSr2),nl(ωvSr2)]=1ωvS(r2)2 represents Wronskian of
$j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S}r)$
jl(ωvSr)
and
$n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)$
nl(ωvSr)
calculated at r = r2.47 

Finally, the pressure wave at the position of the source, r = r2, is

(57)

The pressure wave at the location of the other point source (r = r1),

(58)

can also be determined.

It is also possible to find the solution of the innermost region by using the continuity and the discontinuity of the photoacoustic wave at r = r1. For this region, since

$n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)\rightarrow \infty$
nl(ωvSr) as r → 0, the solution is

(59)

Performing the similar calculations, el is obtained

(60)

This methodology can be generalized to n finite number of point sources lying in the same θ direction (See Fig. 1). In other words, all the point sources are assumed to be co-linear.

FIG. 1.

n Point Sources Case.

FIG. 1.

n Point Sources Case.

Close modal

The pressure waves are

(61)

and

(62)

for the (1)th (leftmost) interval and the (n + 1)th (rightmost) interval, respectively.

For the intermediate regions, the pressure waves in terms of linear combinations of

$j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)$
jl(ωvSr) and
$n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)$
nl(ωvSr)
are

(63)

Constants ail and bil can be obtained by applying the boundary conditions at the boundaries of the intervals. By using the continuity of the pressure wave and the jump of its derivative, the following equations at the boundaries of the intervals (at ri's) are obtained

(64)

and

(65)

where

$\frac{d j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r_i)}{dr}$
djl(ωvSri)dr and
$\frac{d n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r_i)}{dr}$
dnl(ωvSri)dr
denote the values of the derivatives of
$j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)$
jl(ωvSr)
and
$n_l (\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)$
nl(ωvSr)
with respect to r at point ri. By using the continuity of pressure wave and the jump of its derivative, the matrix equation is obtained

(66)

where primes stand for differentiation with respect to r and

$j_l=j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r_i)$
jl=jl(ωvSri) and
$n_l=n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r_i)$
nl=nl(ωvSri)
for a short hand notation.

Multiplying Eq. (66) by the matrix

$\left[ \begin{array}{cc}j_l & n_l \\j_l^{{\prime }} & n_l^{{\prime }} \end{array} \right]^{-1}=\frac{1}{\mathcal {W_ {\emph {i}}}} \left[ \begin{array}{cc}n_l^{{\prime }} & -n_l \\-j_l^{{\prime }} & j_l \end{array} \right]$
jlnljlnl1=1Winlnljljl gives

(67)

where the Wronskian,

$\mathcal {W_{\emph {i}}} \left[ j_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r) , n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r) \right]=\frac{1}{\frac{\omega }{v_S} r_i^2}$
Wijl(ωvSr),nl(ωvSr)=1ωvSri2⁠, is calculated at r = ri. The transfer matrix which gives the relation between the coefficients of the pressure waves for two successive intervals is denoted as
$\mathbb {M}_{il} (\omega )$
Mil(ω)
, that is,

(68)

By using these transfer matrices for a finitely many number of the Dirac delta functions, the coefficients of the rightmost region can be related to the coefficients of the leftmost region as

(69)

where we set b2 = 0 since

$n_l(\frac{\omega }{v_S} r)\rightarrow \infty$
nl(ωvSr) as r → 0.

Hence, when there exists n finitely many number of random sources, the pressure wave in the leftmost region that cannot be measured via a detector can be determined by calculating total transfer matrix,

$\mathbb {M}_{l}$
Ml⁠,

(70)

Eq. (70) shows that when there exists finitely many number of point sources, the pressure wave at the innermost region can be calculated by using only the detector readings at the outermost region regardless of the pressure waves between the innermost and the outermost regions.

Therefore, pressure waves for diffusive media can be measured at the location of sources which are at the bounding surface. On the other hand, the pressure waves at the locations of the point sources not on the boundary but throughout a volume bounded by a surface cannot be measured directly for photoacoustic media. For this reason, by detecting pressure waves at any positions that are greater than the positions of the point sources and then using the continuity and the discontinuity of the pressure wave, the pressure waves pA and pB at the source positions rA and rB, respectively, emitted from the sources can be determined. Writing the calculated pA and pB waves in Eq. (32), the spectral power density of the random sources can be obtained. The spectral power density contains information about the source's optical absorption and excitation.48 The signal's behavior with the help of the spectral power density can also be estimated. Hence, our results can be very useful for photoacoustic systems in order to analyze the tissue composition.

In this work, the representation theorems of the convolution type and the correlation type for the photoacoustic wave equation are recovered for lossless medium. The source term of the equation can be approximated by a Dirac delta function so that correlating measurements of the photoacoustic waves due to the excitation of random point sources can lead to the superposition of the Green's function and its conjugate (time reversal) inside a volume bounded by a surface. Even though it seems that direct measurement of the pressure waves at the locations of the point sources is an obstacle, in this work, it is shown that these pressure waves can be determined from the solutions of the photoacoustic wave equation by applying boundary conditions at the source locations in the frequency domain.

For photoacoustic systems, it is not possible to measure pressure waves at source locations throughout a volume by transducers. Even though the pressure waves cannot be measured directly at the source locations, they can be calculated utilizing the pressure waves measured at any locations different from the positions of the point sources and then using the continuity and the discontinuity of the pressure waves at the locations of sources. Inserting the calculated pressure waves into the expression obtained from the representation theorem of the correlation type, the spectral power density of the system excited by point sources is obtained. The spectral power density of a system has information about optical properties and excitation of the system and hence it is very useful for photoacoustic systems in order to analyze tissue composition. The spectral power density can also give an estimation about the behavior of the signal of the excited system.

The methodology given here can be used to obtain the spectral power density of the excitation due to two random sources and may be generalized to any finitely many number of point sources case. For any finite number of point sources case, by using the overall transfer matrix, the pressure wave at the innermost region is obtained from only the pressure waves measured at the outermost region without obtaining the waves between the outermost and innermost regions.

It has been shown that the velocity of a random distribution of micron-scale absorbers can be measured by the correlation of photoacoustic waves.35 In other words, time shift measurements obtained by cross-correlation of photoacoustic waves make it possible to measure the blood flow in the microvasculature. Fluctuations in the photoacoustic signal resulted from the motion of the red blood cells enable the utilization of the cross-correlations of the photoacoustic waves. As a physical motivation, the red blood cells can be treated as spatially uncorrelated or random point sources.36 

The methodology can also be used to analyze a photoacoustic system excited by random sources throughout a volume bounded by a closed spherical surface and hence it can be useful for biomedical optics.

We would like to thank Osman Teoman Turgut for his valuable comments on the manuscript. This research is supported in part by Marie Curie Reintegration Grant 268287, Bogazici University Research funding BAP 7126, BAP 6033, BAP 6190 and TUBITAK Grant 112T253.

1.
L. V.
Wang
, “
Tutorial on Photoacoustic Microscopy and Computed Tomography
,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
14
,
171
179
(
2008
).
2.
S. M. A.
Salehin
and
T. D.
Abhayapala
, “
Frequency-radial duality based photoacoustic image reconstruction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
150
161
(
2012
).
3.
A. A.
Karabutov
,
N. B.
Podymova
, and
V. S.
Letokhov
, “
Time-resolved laser optoacoustic tomography of inhomogeneous media
,”
Appl. Phys. B-Lasers Opt.
63
,
545
563
(
1996
).
4.
C. G. A.
Hoelen
,
F. F. M.
de Mul
,
R.
Pongers
, and
A.
Dekker
, “
Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging of blood vessels in tissue
,”
Opt. Lett.
23
,
648
650
(
1998
).
5.
R. O.
Esenaliev
,
A. A.
Karabutov
, and
A. A.
Oraevsky
, “
Sensitivity of laser opto-acoustic imaging in detection of small deeply embedded tumors
,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
5
,
981
988
(
1999
).
6.
R. A.
Kruger
,
D. R.
Reinecke
, and
G. A.
Kruger
, “
Thermoacoustic computed tomography–technical considerations
,”
Med. Phys.
26
,
1832
1837
(
1999
).
7.
L. V.
Wang
,
X.
Zhao
,
H.
Sun
, and
G.
Ku
, “
Microwave-induced acoustic imaging of biological tissues
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
70
,
3744
3748
(
1999
).
8.
G.
Ku
and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Scanning microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography: Signal, resolution, and contrast
,”
Med. Phys.
28
,
4
10
(
2001
).
9.
M. H.
Xu
,
G.
Ku
, and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography using multi-sector scanning
,”
Med. Phys.
28
,
1958
1963
(
2001
).
10.
Y.
Xu
and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Signal processing in scanning thermoacoustic tomography in biological tissues
,”
Med. Phys.
28
,
1519
1524
(
2001
).
11.
M. H.
Xu
and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Time-domain reconstruction for thermoacoustic tomography in a spherical geometry
,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.
21
,
814
822
(
2002
).
12.
Y.
Xu
,
M. H.
Xu
, and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Exact frequency-domain reconstruction for thermoacoustic tomography - II: Cylindrical geometry
,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.
21
,
829
833
(
2002
).
13.
J.
Zhang
,
M. A.
Anastasio
, and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Effects of different imagingmodels on least-squares image reconstruction accuracy in photoacoustic tomography
,”
IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.
28
,
1781
1790
(
2009
).
14.
A. A.
Karabutov
,
E. V.
Savateeva
, and
A. A.
Oraevsky
, “
Optoacoustic Tomography: New Modality of laser diagnostic systems
,”
Laser Phys.
13
,
711
723
(
2003
).
15.
X. D.
Wang
,
Y. J.
Pang
,
G.
Ku
,
G.
Stoica
, and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Three-dimensional laser-induced photoacoustic tomography of mouse brain with the skin and skull intact
,”
Opt. Lett.
28
,
1739
1741
(
2003
).
16.
G.
Ku
,
X. D.
Wang
,
G.
Stoica
, and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Multiple-bandwidth photoacoustic tomography
,”
Phys. Med. Biol.
49
,
1329
1338
(
2004
).
17.
Y.
Xu
and
L. V.
Wang
, “
Time Reversal and Its Application to Tomography with Diffracting Sources
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
92
,
033902
(
2004
).
18.
P.
Beard
, “
Biomedical photoacoustic imaging
,”
Interface Focus
1
,
602
631
(
2011
).
19.
A.
Curtis
,
P.
Gerstoft
,
H.
Sato
,
R.
Snieder
, and
K.
Wapenear
, “
Seismic interferometryturning noise into signal
,”
The Leading Edge
25
,
1082
1092
(
2006
).
20.
R.
Snieder
, “
Extracting the Green's function of attenuating heterogeneous media from uncorrelated waves
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2637
2643
(
2007
).
21.
R.
Snieder
, “
Retrieving the Green's function of the diffusion equation from the response to a random forcing
,”
Phys. Rev. E.
74
,
046620
(
2006
).
22.
N. M.
Shapiro
,
M.
Campillo
,
L.
Stehly
, and
M. H.
Ritzwoller
, “
High resolution surface wave tomography from ambient seismic noise
,”
Science
307
,
1615
1618
(
2005
).
23.
P.
Roux
,
K. G.
Sabra
,
P.
Gerstoft
,
W. A.
Kuperman
, and
M. C.
Fehler
, “
P-waves from cross-correlation of seismic noise
,”
Geophys. Res. Lett.
32
,
L19303
, doi: (
2005
).
24.
K. G.
Sabra
,
P.
Gerstoft
,
P.
Roux
,
W. A.
Kuperman
, and
M. C.
Fehler
, “
Surface wave tomography from microseism in Southern California
,”
Geophys. Res. Lett.
32
,
L14311
, doi: (
2005
).
25.
K. G.
Sabra
,
P.
Gerstoft
,
P.
Roux
,
W. A.
Kuperman
, and
M. C.
Fehler
, “
Extracting time-domain Green's function estimates from ambient seismic noise
,”
Geophys. Res. Lett.
32
,
L03310
, doi: (
2005
).
26.
R. L.
Weaver
and
O. I.
Lobkis
, “
Ultrasonics without a Source: Thermal Fluctuation Correlations at MHz Frequencies
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
87
,
134301
(
2001
).
27.
A. E.
Malcolm
,
J. A.
Scales
, and
B. A.
van Tiggelen
, “
Extracting the Green function from diffuse, equipartitioned waves
,”
Phys. Rev. E
70
,
015601R
(
2004
).
28.
E.
Larose
,
G.
Montaldo
,
A.
Derode
, and
M.
Campillo
, “
Passive imaging of localized reflectors and interfaces in open media
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
88
,
104103
(
2006
).
29.
A.
Bakulin
and
R.
Calvert
, “
The virtual source method: Theory and case study
,”
Geophysics
71
,
SI139
SI150
(
2006
).
30.
A.
Bakulin
and
R.
Calvert
, “
Virtual Source: new method for imaging and 4D below complex overburden
,” Expanded Abstracts of 2004 SEG Meeting Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa OK,
2477
2480
(
2004
).
31.
R.
Snieder
and
E.
Şafak
, “
Extracting the building response using seismic interferometry: Theory and application to the Millikan library in Pasadena, California
,”
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
96
,
586
598
(
2006
).
32.
R.
Snieder
,
J.
Sheiman
, and
R.
Calvert
, “
Equivalence of the virtual source method and wavefield deconvolution in seismic interferometry
,”
Phys. Rev. E
73
,
066620
(
2006
).
33.
D. J.
van Manen
,
J. O. A.
Robertsson
, and
A.
Curtis
, “
Modeling of Wave Propagation in Inhomogeneous Media
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
94
,
164301
(
2005
).
34.
M.
Campillo
and
A.
Paul
, “
Long-Range Correlations in the Diffuse Seismic Coda
,”
Science
299
,
547
549
(
2003
).
35.
J.
Brunkera
and
P.
Beard
, “
Pulsed photoacoustic Doppler flowmetry using time-domain cross-correlation: Accuracy, resolution and scalability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
1780
1791
(
2012
).
36.
Z.
Guo
,
L.
Li
, and
L. V.
Wang
, “
The speckle-free nature of photoacoustic tomography
,”
Proc. of SPIE
7177
,
71772J1
7
(
2013
).
37.
L. V.
Wang
and
H.
Wu
,
Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging. Hoboken
(
Wiley
,
NJ
,
2007
), pp.
284
287
.
38.
J. T.
Fokkema
and
P. M.
van der Berg
,
Seismic Applications of Reciprocity
(
Elseiver
,
Amsterdam
,
1993
), pp.
95
103
.
39.
J. T.
Fokkema
and
P. M.
van der Berg
,
Wavefields and Reciprocity
(
Delft University Press
,
Delft
,
1996
), pp.
99
108
.
40.
I. G.
Calasso
,
W.
Craig
, and
G. J.
Diebold
, “
Photoacoustic Point Source
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
86
,
3550
3553
(
2001
).
41.
K.
Wapenaar
,
J.
Fokkema
, and
R.
Snieder
, “
Time-lapse travel time change of multiply scattered acoustic wavesi
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
2783
2786
(
2005
).
42.
K.
Wapenaar
, “
Retrieving the Elastodynamic Green's Function of an Arbitrary Inhomogeneous Medium by Cross Correlation
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
93
,
254301
(
2004
).
43.
M. A.
Anastasio
,
J.
Zhang
,
D.
Modgil
, and
P. J. L.
Rivière
, “
Application of inverse source concepts to photoacoustic tomography
,”
Inverse Problems
23
,
S21
S35
(
2007
).
44.
S. G.
Mykhlin
,
Mathematical Physics: An Advanced Course
(
North-Holland
,
Amsterdam
,
1970
), pp.
345
370
.
45.
Y. V.
Egorov
and
M. A.
Shubin
,
Partial Differential Equations vol 1
(
Springer
,
Berlin
,
1992
), pp.
12
15
.
46.
E.
Demiralp
and
H.
Beker
, “
Properties of bound states of the Schrödinger equation with attractive Dirac delta potentials
,”
J. Phys. A: Mathematical and General
36
,
7449
7459
(
2003
).
47.
I. S.
Gradshteyn
and
I. M.
Ryzhik
,
Tables of Integrals, Series and Products
(
Academic
,
New York
,
1980
), pp.
926
927
.
48.
A.
Rosencwaig
, “
Photoacoustic spectroscopy of solids
,”
Optic Communications
7
,
305
308
(
1973
).