Superamphiphobic materials that possess extraordinary hydrophobic and oleophobic dual characteristics have aroused widespread attention for their application in the fields of self-cleaning, petroleum industry, and antifouling. However, the synthetic process is a formidable challenge. Herein, this paper provides a simple method for preparing superamphiphobic materials on the base of stainless steel metal mesh (SSM). CuO nanoclusters (CuO-NCs) were fabricated in situ on the surface of SSM to obtain CuO-NCs@SSM by immersion–burning method, followed by solution deposition method to coat the silane fluoride group (SFG) on CuO-NCs@SSM (SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM). SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM possesses brilliant superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties with the static contact angle of water, diesel oil, glycerin, corn oil, and liquid paraffin droplets of 153°, 152°, 153°, 152°, and 151°, respectively. The sample also shows excellent anti-adhesion, from which the falling water can automatically take away the powder attached to the surface of the material. When the sample was immersed in liquid paraffin, the mirror phenomenon will appear. Moreover, the material remains dry on the surface after taking out from the solutions of liquid paraffin or muddy water. In addition, the sample has excellent high temperature resistance and acid/alkaline resistance. The chemical durability tests display that SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM can remain superamphiphobic under chemical damages, including high temperatures (25–200 °C) and acid/alkaline solutions (pH = 1–14). In this paper, the fabrication process of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM can be extended to different metal materials, which has enormous range of application potential prospects.

The ability of animals and plants that protect their bodies from water is vitally important for their survival in nature, and various anti-wetting surfaces have been fabricated by simulating biological surfaces in different ways.1 Wettability is one of the most important physical and chemical properties of solid surfaces, which can be divided into superhydrophobic, superhydrophilic, underwater superoleophobic, etc.2,3 It is worth noting that superamphiphobic materials have attracted extensive research due to their brilliant superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties. In the past few decades, superamphiphobic materials have a wide range of applications, including pipeline transportation,4,5 shipbuilding,6,7 electronic devices,8–10 self-cleaning,11–15 and oil–water separation.16–18 

Due to the relatively low activity of the metal surface, it is easy to be polluted and corroded.19,20 How to explore the method to make metal materials more stable has become one of the current research hotspots. The common and highly efficient preparation strategy of metal-based superamphiphobic materials is achieved by changing the surface roughness and by loading a low surface energy compound. For example, Liu et al. described a method for the preparation of a hierarchical step-like microstructure with nanopores, which was fabricated on an Al surface through chemical etching, anodization, and fluorination and confers superamphiphobic properties.21 Liu et al. presented a method for preparing a robust superamphiphobic coating by using the reaction of magnesium alloy matrix with aluminum phosphate to form a layered rough structure and by coating the extremely low surface energy 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctane trichlorosilane for reducing the surface energy.22 Wu et al. proposed an industry compatible method to achieve super-repellency properties by forming alumina nanowires on the surface of sample using the electrochemical method and modifying the surface with hydrophobic materials.23 Mevra et al. presented an approach to create a superamphiphobic TiO2 layer on the pure titanium material by using the sol–gel method.24 Nevertheless, these methods for preparing superamphiphobic materials usually have some shortcomings, such as complex synthesis process, cumbersome operation, expensive equipment or devices, and by-product formation, which restrict the large-scale application of metal-based superamphiphobic materials.

In addition, although the superamphiphobic coating can effectively separate the water and organic solvents from the metal surface, there are still some challenges in the wide practical application, such as chemical stability and high temperature stability. First, a variety of corrosive media in the environment will gradually destroy the superamphiphobic coating on the metal surface over time, eventually leading to serious metal corrosion. In addition, the brilliant superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties can be achieved at room temperature for most natural or artificial superbiphobic surfaces. However, as temperature increases, the superamphiphobicity properties of the material surface gradually weaken, making it easier for the solution to diffuse and moisten solid surfaces.25 Therefore, it is of great significance to develop a green and simple method for the preparation of metal superamphiphobic coating with excellent high temperature resistance and corrosion resistance.

Herein, we take the stainless steel metal mesh (SSM) substrates as an example. CuO nanoclusters (CuO-NCs) were formed on the surface of SSM by immersion–burning method and solution deposition method (CuO-NCs@SSM). In this process, C10H14CuO4 dissolved by ethanol distributes uniformly on the SSM skeleton so as to ensure the uniform and dense distribution of CuO-NCs in situ on the surface of SSM. At the same time, CuO-NCs not only improve the surface roughness of SSM but also effectively enhance the adhesion between the superamphiphobic component and SSM. Then, silane fluoride group (SFG) was grafted on CuO-NCs@SSM to obtain the superamphiphobic sample SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM, which was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and x-ray diffractometer (XRD). In addition, the antifouling performance, self-cleaning ability, chemical stability, and high temperature stability of the samples were also investigated.

SSM (400 meshes, 6 × 6 cm2) was purchased from Taobao (Changzhou, China), which was ultrasonically cleaned in anhydrous ethanol for 1 h and dried at 60 °C for 4 h before using. Bis(3-trimethoxysilylpropyl)amine (BTM), cupric acetylacetonate (C10H14CuO4, 99%), 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APT), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA, 96%) were obtained from Macklin biochemical technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All of these chemicals were used as received without any depuration.

C10H14CuO4 (1 g) was dissolved in anhydrous ethanol (100 ml) under magnetic stirring for 1 h at room temperature. SSM was immersed in the above solution for about 10 s and then taken out to burn in air. This impregnation–combustion process was repeated 20 times. In order to remove surface residues, the prepared material was immersed in deionized water for 24 h and finally dried at 75 °C for 2 h to get CuO-NCs@SSM.

First of all, APT (200 μl) and BTM (200 μl) were added to anhydrous ethanol (30 ml) and stirred for 30 min at room temperature, which was recorded as solution A. In addition, PFOA (1 g) was dissolved into anhydrous ethanol (15 ml) and stirred for 30 min at room temperature to acquire solution B. Second, solution A was added dropwise into solution B and stirred for 2 h at 300 rpm, forming the APT–BTM–PFOA emulsion. Finally, CuO-NCs@SSM was put in the above emulsion and left for 24 h; after that, it was washed three times with deionized water and dried at 75 °C to obtain SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM for further characterization.

The microscopic morphology of the sample was visualized by FESEM (Gemini 500, Zeiss) and TEM (Tecnai G2 F20, FEI, USA). XPS (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and EDS (X-MaxN 80, Oxford, UK) were used to measure the surface chemical composition of the samples. XRD with a Cu K radiation source was used to obtain x-ray diffraction patterns (D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany). The water static contact angle and oil contact angle were measured using the contact angle goniometer (DSA100, KRUSS, Germany) at room temperature.

The self-cleaning stability of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM was examined by coating adhesion test. The process of the TiO2 powder on the sample being taken off by the falling water was recorded, and the surface adhesion phenomenon of the sample being immersed in liquid paraffin and muddy water and then being taken out was observed. In addition, the high temperature stability and chemical stability of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM were studied. The high temperature resistance test was carried out by exposing the samples in the temperature range of 25–200 °C for 24 h, and the acid/alkaline resistance test was evaluated by putting the samples into the acid/alkaline solutions with different pH values (pH = 1–14) for 30 min.

Figure 1 presents the schematic diagram of the preparation of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM by a simple immersion–burning method and solution deposition method. First, a piece of SSM was dipped into the ethanol solution of C10H14CuO4 to get SSM filled with the solution and then taken out for burning in air. In this dipping–burning process, ethanol can not only dissolve C10H14CuO4 and deposit it on the SSM skeleton but can also be used as a fuel to make C10H14CuO4 fully burned. At the same time, C10H14CuO4 was decomposed steadily at high temperatures to form CuO nanoparticles.26,27 After repeating 20 times, CuO nanoparticles were continuously deposited to grow CuO-NCs on the SSM surface, which not only improved the surface roughness of SSM but also effectively enhanced the adhesion between superamphiphobic components and SSM.28 Second, CuO-NCs@SSM was put into the APT–BTM–PFOA emulsion to form SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM. CuO would be dissociated to form hydroxyl groups (–OH) when the surface was submerged in water due to the greater polarity of Cu–O bonds of CuO nanoparticles.29 In addition, APT and BTM would hydrolyze and form hydroxyl groups under alkaline conditions (–OH).30,31 The connection of BTM and CuO-NCs was achieved by condensation reaction.32 BTM possesses high activity, which can be subjected to amidation reaction with the carboxyl group of oleophobic factors (PFOA) to form a host of long-chain perfluoropolymers on the surface.28,32 In virtue of the C–F group of perfluorinated chains, the low surface tension can greatly reduce surface energy, which makes the modified SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM possess excellent oleophobic properties.33 Moreover, hydrophobic factors (APT) are grafted onto BTM by condensation reaction, which grows dense single molecules with low surface energy on the surface. It can prevent droplet diffusion on the surface, which exhibits superhydrophobic characteristics.29 It is worth noting that more air is retained in the surface rough structure, forming a layer of air cushion at the micro- and nano-level, which can greatly reduce the contact area between the liquid and the sample surface to realize the nonwettability of the liquid.34 In summary, SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM possesses the dual properties of superhydrophobic and superoleophobic through the changing of surface microstructure and the chemical modification.

FIG. 1.

Schematic illustration of the preparation of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM.

FIG. 1.

Schematic illustration of the preparation of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM.

Close modal

The surface morphology of the samples was analyzed by FESEM and TEM. The uniform shapes and flat surfaces of the typical FESEM images of an unprocessed SSM are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(d). However, the smooth and flat surface of SSM is not conducive to the formation of superamphiphobic coating on its surface, so it is necessary to further improve its surface roughness. As shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(e), CuO-NCs@SSM obtained by the immersion–burning method is coated with uniform and dense CuO-NCs. CuO nanoparticles were continuously deposited to grow CuO-NCs on the SSM surface, which is consistent with the TEM result (Fig. 3). The formation of CuO-NCs on the surface of SSM by in situ synthesis can not only effectively improve the surface roughness of SSM but also significantly enhance the bonding between superamphiphobic components and SSM. Compared with CuO-NCs@SSM, the surface morphology of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM was obviously changed after the solution deposition process [Figs. 2(c) and 2(f)], which can indicate that hydrophobic factors and oleophobic factors were successfully loaded on the SSM surface.

FIG. 2.

FESEM images of SSM (a) and (d), CuO-NCs@SSM (b) and (e), and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM (c) and (f).

FIG. 2.

FESEM images of SSM (a) and (d), CuO-NCs@SSM (b) and (e), and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM (c) and (f).

Close modal
FIG. 3.

TEM images of CuO-NCs.

FIG. 3.

TEM images of CuO-NCs.

Close modal

To analyze the chemical compositions of the samples, XPS measurements were performed. As described in Fig. 4, XPS was used to measure chemical bond states in SSM, CuO-NCs@SSM, and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM. XPS results demonstrate the existence of C (284.6 eV), O (531.6 eV), and Fe (712.2 eV) elements on the surface of SSM.30 Compared with SSM, the Cu 2p signal peak of CuO-NCs@SSM was significantly detected and the Fe 2p signal peak was relatively weakened, confirming the existence of CuO in the coating.35 In addition, the distribution of Si 2p, F 1s, and N 1s peaks in the XPS spectrum of the SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM surface confirms that SFG was loaded on the surface of CuO-NCs@SSM. The chemical composition of the SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM surface elements was further measured by using EDS (Fig. 5). The SEM-based EDS elemental mappings revealed that CuO-NCs and SFG are successfully coated on the SSM surface, which corresponds to the XPS results.

FIG. 4.

XPS analysis of SSM, CuO-NCs@SSM, and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM.

FIG. 4.

XPS analysis of SSM, CuO-NCs@SSM, and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

Images of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM on EDS elemental mappings.

FIG. 5.

Images of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM on EDS elemental mappings.

Close modal

In order to clarify the internal crystal structure, the XRD pattern of SSM, CuO-NCs@SSM, and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM was analyzed, as shown in Fig. 6. There are three obvious diffraction peaks in the (110), (200), and (220) lattice planes belonging to SSM at 2θ = 43.9°, 51.1°, and 75.1°, respectively.36 After the immersion–burning process, the diffraction pattern of CuO-NCs@SSM shows multiple peaks at 2θ = 35.9°, 49.3°, 53.7°, 58.6°, 61.7°, 66.6°, 74.7°, and 75.2°, corresponding to CuO replication (002), (202), (020), (202), (113), (022), (113), and (311) crystal surfaces.37–39 It is worth noting that the diffraction peak intensity of SSM is significantly reduced after the loading of CuO-NCs on the surface of SSM, which can be attributed to the homogeneous and dense CuO-NCs layer on the substrate.32 Due to the poor crystallinity of SFG, no significant characteristic diffraction peaks of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM were detected.

FIG. 6.

XRD patterns of SSM, CuO-NCs@SSM, and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM.

FIG. 6.

XRD patterns of SSM, CuO-NCs@SSM, and SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM.

Close modal

The superamphiphobicity of the sample plays an important role in supporting potential practical applications. As shown in Fig. 7(a), water, diesel oil, glycerin, corn oil, and liquid paraffin all keep nearly perfect spherical shapes on the surface of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM, indicating an excellent superamphiphobic property. To quantify the superamphiphobic performance of the as-prepared SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM surface, the water static contact angle and oil contact angle were also observed [Fig. 7(b)]. The water static contact angle is about 153°, exhibiting excellent hydrophobic properties. The static contact angles of various oil droplets were measured, which are about 152°, 153°, 152°, and 151° for diesel oil, glycerin, corn oil, and liquid paraffin, respectively. The above results show that CuO-NCs and SFG coating on SSM can successfully transform the modified SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM into a superamphiphobicity surface due to the low surface energy and air cushion effect.

FIG. 7.

(a) Water and a series of oil droplets on top of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM. (b) SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM contact angle test for water and different oil liquids. Results are represented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

FIG. 7.

(a) Water and a series of oil droplets on top of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM. (b) SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM contact angle test for water and different oil liquids. Results are represented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Close modal

Metal materials surfaces will inevitably come into contact with different kinds of dust and pollutants to cause pollution or corrosion during the usage or outdoor exposure in real world applications. Therefore, it is crucial to give the coating the ability for resisting the surface contamination. In this paper, TiO2 powder, glycerin, and muddy water were regarded as target pollutants, respectively. The self-cleaning and antifouling performance of the modified SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM were tested (Fig. 8). As can be seen from Fig. 8(a), the liquid rolls off the top of the sample covered with TiO2 powder, and the liquid carries the powder away. Eventually, the surface of the sample becomes clean again due to the synergistic effect of low surface energy and micro-/nano-structure of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM. The loading of a low surface energy material effectively prevents the diffusion of droplets on the surface of the material, and the contact area between the droplets and the sample surface can be greatly reduced due to the air cushion formed by the micro-/nano-structure. In addition, as displayed in Fig. 8(b), the modified SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM was soaked in glycerin to show a mirror-like phenomenon.34 The surface of the sample remained dry after taking it out from the solutions of glycerin or muddy water [Figs. 8(b) and 8(c)]. The superamphiphobic properties of the sample surface can effectively protect the material from liquid penetration and contamination, giving SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM excellent self-cleaning properties and antifouling ability. Metal materials treated by this simple and green experimental method can be widely used in the field of construction or transportation, not only to ensure cleanliness but also to effectively extend the service time.

FIG. 8.

(a) Evolution processes of the self-cleaning behavior of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM using TiO2 powder as contaminants. (b) Antifouling performance of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM testing by glycerol. (c) Antifouling performance of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM testing by muddy water.

FIG. 8.

(a) Evolution processes of the self-cleaning behavior of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM using TiO2 powder as contaminants. (b) Antifouling performance of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM testing by glycerol. (c) Antifouling performance of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM testing by muddy water.

Close modal

The temperature has a certain impact on the superamphiphobic properties of the sample, so the thermal stability of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM was also studied. The results of the water contact angle and oil contact angle of the sample exposed to different temperatures for 24 h are shown in Fig. 9(a). As the temperature increases in the range from 25 to 200 °C, the static contact angle of the sample for water and glycerin is still maintained at about 150°, showing its good superamphiphobicity. Therefore, the modified SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM possesses good thermal stability, which greatly broadens the practical application fields, such as a high temperature industrial environment. In practical applications, the chemical stability of the material is essential for its usage under complex conditions, such as corrosive environments. The chemical stability test was evaluated by putting the samples into the acid/alkaline solutions with different pH values (pH = 1–14) for 30 min, and then, the static contact angle variation of the as-treated SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM for water and glycerin was studied. As shown in Fig. 9(b), the surface exhibits superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties with the static contact angle for water and glycerin remaining unchanged at about 150° after immersion under corrosive conditions. The main reason is that SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM still possesses an excellent superhydrophobic characteristic in strong acid or alkali solutions so that the acid or alkali solutions cannot fully contact the surface of the material. Thus, the surface chemical structure and properties of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM cannot be changed. Compared with previous literature that only measured the contact angle of the acid/alkaline droplets on the sample surface,40 this study immersed the sample into the acid/alkaline solutions for 30 min, so the as-obtained results are more valuable for practical applications. In summary, the superamphiphobic material described in this paper shows excellent performance in terms of self-cleaning, antifouling ability, high temperature resistance, and corrosion resistance, which makes this material of great application potential in pipeline transportation, shipbuilding, oil–water separation, construction materials, and high temperature resistant materials.

FIG. 9.

(a) Contact angle of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM after different temperature treatments. (b) Stability of solutions with different pH gradients on superbiphobic surfaces. Results are represented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

FIG. 9.

(a) Contact angle of SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM after different temperature treatments. (b) Stability of solutions with different pH gradients on superbiphobic surfaces. Results are represented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Close modal

In this work, we have successfully prepared a kind of superamphiphobic coating with excellent superamphiphobicity and stability by immersion–burning method and solution deposition method. The uniform and dense CuO-NCs coated on the SSM surface by immersion–burning method play a crucial role in forming the rough surface structure and the adhesion between superamphiphobic components and SSM. Meanwhile, oleophobic factors (PFOA) with long-chain perfluoropolymers and hydrophobic factors (APT) with low-surface-energy functional groups were successfully grafted onto the surface of SSM through the connection of BTM, contributing to their brilliant superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties. The as-prepared SFG@CuO-NCs@SSM also possesses remarkable self-cleaning and antifouling properties, which are desirable in practical applications. Moreover, the samples still show excellent superamphiphobic properties after immersion in acid/alkaline solutions, demonstrating an outstanding performance of long-period anticorrosion. In view of the facile and cost-effective experimental process and superior performance, the proposed superamphiphobic coating technology on metal surface can be extended with widespread industrial applications, especially in high temperature and corrosive environments.

This work was supported by Anhui Nature Science Research Program (Grant No. 2022AH051954), Anhui Academic Leaders Cultivation Program (Grant No. DTR2023046), Huangshan University Science Research Program (Grant No. 2022xkjzd001), Anhui Offline First-Class Courses Program (2023xxkc303), and Huangshan University Educational Reform Program (Grant No. 2023JXYJ01).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

The authors’ contributions to the manuscript are as follows: Yinyu Sun, Changjiang Li, and Caiyun Shen conceived the study; Yinyu Sun, Zihan Yin, and Caiyun Shen designed the methodology; Zihan Yin, Yu Liu, Qi Chen, and Wei Yang performed validation; Yinyu Sun, Zihan Yin, Changjiang Li, and Caiyun Shen wrote the original draft of this manuscript; Zihan Yin, Yinyu Sun, Zhongcheng Ke, and Changjiang Li reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Yinyu Sun: Conceptualization (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Zihan Yin: Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Caiyun Shen: Conceptualization (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Wei Yang: Validation (equal). Qi Chen: Validation (equal). Yu Liu: Validation (equal). Zhongcheng Ke: Writing – review & editing (equal). Changjiang Li: Conceptualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
L.
Chen
,
Z.
Guo
, and
W.
Liu
, “
Biomimetic multi-functional superamphiphobic FOTS-TiO2 particles beyond lotus leaf
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
8
,
27188
27198
(
2016
).
2.
J.
Yong
,
F.
Chen
,
M.
Li
et al, “
Remarkably simple achievement of superhydrophobicity, superhydrophilicity, underwater superoleophobicity, underwater superoleophilicity, underwater superaerophobicity, and underwater superaerophilicity on femtosecond laser ablated PDMS surfaces
,”
J. Mater. Chem. A
5
,
25249
25257
(
2017
).
3.
H.
Zhang
,
D.
Li
,
J.
Huang
et al, “
Advance in structural classification and stability study of superamphiphobic surfaces
,”
J. Bionic Eng.
20
,
366
389
(
2023
).
4.
X.
Zhang
,
Y.
Dong
,
Z.
He
et al, “
Efficient gas transportation using bioinspired superhydrophobic yarn as the gas-siphon underwater
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
15
),
18174
18181
(
2020
).
5.
H.
Xu
,
C.
Lin
,
W.
Chen
et al, “
Effects of pipe material on nitrogen transformation, microbial communities and functional genes in raw water transportation
,”
Water Res.
143
,
188
197
(
2018
).
6.
G.
Wang
,
Z.
Zeng
,
H.
Wang
et al, “
Low drag porous ship with superhydrophobic and superoleophilic surface for oil spills cleanup
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
7
(
47
),
26184
26194
(
2015
).
7.
H.
Wang
,
Y.
Huang
,
W.
Zhang
, and
A.
Ostendorf
, “
Investigation of multiple laser shock peening on the mechanical property and corrosion resistance of shipbuilding 5083Al alloy under a simulated seawater environment
,”
Appl. Opt.
57
,
6300
6308
(
2018
).
8.
C.
Liang
,
Z.
Gu
,
Y.
Zhang
et al, “
Structural design strategies of polymer matrix composites for electromagnetic interference shielding: A review
,”
Nano-Micro Lett
13
,
181
(
2021
).
9.
J.
Wang
,
Z.
Bai
,
K.
Xiao
et al, “
Effect of static magnetic field on mold corrosion of printed circuit boards
,”
Bioelectrochemistry
131
,
107394
(
2020
).
10.
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Zheng
,
S.
Qiu
, and
L.
Song
, “
Ethanol inducing self-assembly of poly-(thioctic acid)/graphene supramolecular ionomers for healable, flame-retardant, shape-memory electronic devices
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
629
,
908
915
(
2023
).
11.
R.
Yuan
,
S.
Wu
,
P.
Yu
et al, “
Superamphiphobic and electroactive nanocomposite toward self-cleaning, antiwear, and anticorrosion coatings
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
8
(
19
),
12481
12493
(
2016
).
12.
M.
Yu
,
W.
Lyu
,
Y.
Liao
,
M.
Zhu
et al, “
Snakeskin-inspired hierarchical winkled surface for ultradurable superamphiphobic fabrics via short-fluorinated polymer reactive infusion
,”
Adv. Fiber Mater.
5
,
543
553
(
2023
).
13.
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Li
,
Z.
Shang
et al, “
Wettability-driven synergistic resistance of scale and oil on robust superamphiphobic coating
,”
Chin. Chem. Lett.
35
,
109623
(
2024
).
14.
A.
Khan
,
K.
Huang
,
M.-G.
Sarwar
et al, “
Self-healing and self-cleaning clear coating
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
577
,
311
318
(
2020
).
15.
F.
Geyer
,
M.
D’Acunzi
,
A.
Sharifi-Aghili
et al, “
When and how self-cleaning of superhydrophobic surfaces works
,”
Sci. Adv.
6
,
eaaw9727
(
2020
).
16.
J.
He
,
J.
Li
,
L.
Ma
et al, “
High-flux oil-water separation with superhydrophilicity and underwater superoleophobicity ZIF-67@Cu(OH)2 nanowire membrane
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
56
,
3140
3154
(
2021
).
17.
A.
Xie
,
J.
Cui
,
Y.
Chen
et al, “
Dual-channel separation system based on platanus fruit-like Ni@Ni(OH)2 hierarchical architecture for fast, efficient and continuous light/heavy oil–water separation
,”
J. Ind. Eng. Chem.
74
,
208
205
(
2019
).
18.
B.
Jiang
,
Z.
Chen
,
H.
Dou
et al, “
Superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic Ti foam with fluorinated hierarchical flower-like TiO2 nanostructures for effective oil-in-water emulsion separation
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
456
,
114
123
(
2018
).
19.
T.
Hersbach
,
I.
McCrum
,
D.
Anastasiadou
et al, “
Alkali metal cation effects in structuring Pt, Rh, and Au surfaces through cathodic corrosion
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
45
),
39363
39379
(
2018
).
20.
Y.
Lekbach
,
T.
Liu
,
Y.
Li
et al, “
Microbial corrosion of metals: The corrosion microbiome
,”
Adv. Microb. Physiol.
78
,
371
390
(
2021
).
21.
Y.
Liu
,
H.
Cao
,
S.
Chen
, and
D.
Wang
, “
Ag nanoparticle-Loaded hierarchical superamphiphobic surface on an Al substrate with enhanced anticorrosion and antibacterial properties
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
119
(
45
),
25449
25456
(
2015
).
22.
L.
Liu
,
X.
Li
,
J.
Lei
et al, “
Superamphiphobic magnesium alloys with extraordinary environmental adaptability
,”
Langmuir
37
(
14
),
4267
4275
(
2021
).
23.
W.
Wu
,
X.
Wang
,
D.
Wang
et al, “
Alumina nanowire forests via unconventional anodization and super-repellency plus low adhesion to diverse liquids
,”
Chem. Commun.
9
(
9
),
1043
1045
(
2009
).
24.
A.
Mevra
,
Y.
Tuba
, and
F.
Ali
, “
Superamphiphobic TiO2 film by sol–gel dip coating method on commercial pure titanium
,”
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
33
,
1472
1484
(
2024
).
25.
B.-C.
Li
and
J.-P.
Zhang
, “
Durable and self-healing superamphiphobic coatings repellent even to hot liquids
,”
Chem. Commun.
52
(
13
),
2744
2747
(
2016
).
26.
C.
Pham-Huu
,
R.
Vieira
,
B.
Louis
et al, “
About the octopus-like growth mechanism of carbon nanofibers over graphite supported nickel catalyst
,”
J. Catal.
240
,
194
202
(
2006
).
27.
S.
Han
,
J.
Yang
,
X.-F.
Li
et al, “
Flame synthesis of super-hydrophilic carbon nanotube/Ni foams decorated with Fe2O3 nanoparticles for water purification via solar steam generation
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
11
),
13229
13238
(
2020
).
28.
J.-W.
Lu
,
X.-T.
Zhu
,
X.
Miao
et al, “
Photocatalytically active superhydrophilic/superoleophobic coating
,”
ACS Omega
5
,
11448
11454
(
2020
).
29.
W.-T.
Kong
,
F.-R.
Li
,
Y.-L.
Pan
, and
X.
Zhao
, “
Hygro-responsive, photo-decomposed superoleophobic/superhydrophilic coating for on-demand oil–water separation
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
13
(
29
),
35142
35152
(
2021
).
30.
B.-B.
Zhang
,
W.-C.
Xu
,
D.-H.
Xia
et al, “
Spray coated superamphiphobic surface with hot water repellency and durable corrosion resistance
,”
Colloids Surf., A
596
,
124750
(
2020
).
31.
J.-W.
Peng
,
S.-C.
Yuan
,
H.-L.
Geng
et al, “
Robust and multifunctional superamphiphobic coating toward effective anti-adhesion
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
428
,
131162
(
2022
).
32.
M.-N.
Qu
,
L.-L.
Ma
,
J.-X.
Wang
et al, “
Multifunctional superwettable material with smart pH responsiveness for efficient and controllable oil/water separation and emulsified wastewater purification
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
11
(
27
),
24668
24682
(
2019
).
33.
M.
Qu
,
L.
Ma
,
Y.
Zhou
et al, “
Durable and recyclable superhydrophilic–superoleophobic materials for efficient oil/water separation and water-soluble dyes removal
,”
ACS Appl. Nano Mater.
1
(
9
),
5197
5209
(
2018
).
34.
X.
Yue
,
D.
Fu
,
T.
Zhang
et al, “
Superhydrophobic stainless-steel mesh with excellent electrothermal properties for efficient separation of highly viscous water-in-crude oil emulsions
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
59
,
17918
17926
(
2020
).
35.
R.
Li
,
M.
Zang
,
Y.
Cheng
et al, “
Temperature and pH endurable self-assembled camellia-like nanostructure achieved on zinc sheet with superamphiphobicity for fog harvesting
,”
Heliyon
9
(
4
),
e14775
(
2023
).
36.
H.
Wang
,
G.
Yan
,
X.
Cao
et al, “
Hierarchical Cu(OH)2@MnO2 core-shell nanorods array in situ generated on three-dimensional copper foam for high-performance supercapacitors
,”
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
563
,
394
404
(
2020
).
37.
J.
Li
,
H.
Shao
,
G.
Shao
et al, “
Flexible warp-knitted metal mesh-based composites: An effective EMI shielding material with efficient Joule heating
,”
ACS Appl. Polym. Mater.
4
(
10
),
7025
7041
(
2022
).
38.
S.-Y.
Liu
,
J.-L.
Ru
, and
F.-Z.
Liu
, “
NiP/CuO composites: Electroless plating synthesis, antibiotic photodegradation and antibacterial properties
,”
Chemosphere
267
,
129220
(
2021
).
39.
K.
Mikami
,
Y.
Kido
,
Y.
Akaishi
et al, “
Synthesis of Cu2O/CuO nanocrystals and their application to H2S sensing
,”
Sensors
19
,
211
(
2019
).
40.
Z.
Qiao
,
G.
Ren
,
X.
Chen
et al, “
Fabrication of robust waterborne superamphiphobic coatings with antifouling, heat insulation, and anticorrosion
,”
ACS Omega
8
,
804
818
(
2022
).