In this article, we identify a new ground state (TlPH2) of surface-hydrogenated TlP from a possible crystalline configuration. The crystalline structure of TlPH2 is based on the previously proposed TlP with further hydrogenation. It is predicted to be more favorable than the previously proposed TlP and is confirmed to be dynamically stable. The calculated band structures demonstrate that TlPH2 is a direct bandgap semiconductor with a gap of 0.801 and 1.402 eV based on the DFT-PBE and HSE06 methods, respectively. It is a potential piezoelectric material with coefficients of −24.73 and −0.79 pm/V for d11 and d31, respectively. These coefficients are comparable to those of two-dimensional (2D) group III–V buckled honeycomb monolayers and more remarkable than those of the surface-modified penta-graphene and group-III phosphides. In particular, the combination of direct bandgap semiconducting behavior and robust piezoelectric response positions TlPH2 as a multifunctional material for nanoscale applications, such as sensors, actuators, electric field generators, and energy harvesters.

Piezoelectric materials have triggered a wide range of interest from condensed matter physicists, chemists, semiconductor device engineers, and materials scientists in recent years. At the same time, it draws the scientific community’s attention toward these low-dimensional piezoelectric materials. Piezoelectricity is an extraordinary material property that converts mechanical energy into electric energy and vice versa. Piezoelectricity is only possible in semiconductor materials that have broken their inversion and mirror symmetry. For example, in layered materials, such as TMDCs1–4 and group III and IV monochalcogenides,5–13 reduction to a single layer disrupts the centrosymmetric structure, revealing and enhancing piezoelectric properties. In the transition from bulk to a single layer, the piezoelectric coefficients of bulk SnSe increase as the number of layers decreases in odd-layer configurations.14 Recent advances in 2D materials have demonstrated diverse strategies to engineer piezoelectricity, such as the flexoelectric effect15 and inducing piezoelectricity by creating pores with specific symmetries in graphene.16 In contrast to conventional piezoelectric materials requiring non-centrosymmetric structures, recent studies on strain-gradient-induced polarization in graphene highlight the critical role of symmetry-breaking mechanisms in centrosymmetric systems for achieving electromechanical coupling.17 However, it is common knowledge that few 2D materials have a significant piezoelectric effect in the out-of-plane.

Most recently, there have been some studies on out-of-plane piezoelectric coefficients. For instance, Gao et al. have reported out-of-plane piezoelectric coefficients of 0.07–0.46 pm/V in Janus group-III chalcogenide monolayers.18 Guo et al. have shown a large piezoelectric coefficient (e31 = 96.88 pC/m) in the hydrofluorination of penta-graphene (PG).19 Li et al. have shown a d31 value of 6.28 pm/V in Li-doped black P (P4Li2).20 Ong and Reed have selected F and Li atoms to be adsorbed on graphene, thereby inducing a maximum d31 coefficient (d31 = 0.30 pm/V).21 Shang et al. have shown a piezoelectric strain coefficient d33 value of −5.33 pm/V in the C3HF–Si1FS monolayer.22 Nevertheless, TlP has an inversion center and does not possess intrinsic piezoelectricity. Amazingly, we found that TlP of surface hydrogenation (TlPH2) exhibits a larger piezoelectric coefficient than the reported GaP and InP. After a deep understanding of piezoelectricity, plenty of strategies can be used to enhance the piezoelectric effect, such as chemical doping, adatoms, and defects. Typically, we propose that TlP can be designed to be piezoelectric through selective surface atomic adsorption.

In this article, we systematically investigate the configuration’s structures, stabilities, and electronic properties for surface-hydrogenated TlP. A new ground state based on the surface hydrogenation configuration of TlP (TlPH2) is uncovered. Moreover, the new TlPH2 is a potential piezoelectric material due to its non-centrosymmetry, similar to the hexagonal group III–V compounds GaP and InP,7 which are suitable piezoelectric materials. The piezoelectric coefficients d11 and d31 for TlPH2 are evaluated as −24.73 and −0.79 pm/V, respectively. We found that the piezoelectricity in TlPH2 is more notable than that of the theoretically viable hydrofluorination of penta-graphene19 and Janus group-III chalcogenide monolayers,18 indicating that it is expected that TlPH2 can be synthesized for sensors, actuators, electric field generators, and any other applications that require electrical and mechanical energy conversion.

The first-principles calculations for the optimization of the structure and investigation of properties are performed using the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (VASP),23,24 in which a set of plane wave bases is used to expand the wave functions of the system. The interactions between nuclei and valence electrons are described by the projector augmented wave (PAW) method.25 Interactions between valence electrons are counted using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA).26 The cutoff energy is 500 eV, and a 5 × 9 × 1 k-point mesh is used in the calculation process. The crystal structures are fully relaxed until the residual force on each atom is less than 10−3 eV/Å and the total energy change is less than 10−6 eV. In all our calculating models, the vacuum distance is set to be greater than 20 Å to eliminate the interaction between adjacent layers. For the newly discovered ground state of TlPH2, the vibrational spectra are simulated through the phonopy code27,28 with forces calculated from VASP to evaluate its dynamical stability. The hybrid functional method (HSE06) was used to calculate the band structures.29 

The crystalline structure of TlP [shown in Fig. 1(a)] is very similar to that of h-BN reported previously.30 It belongs to the non-centrosymmetric buckled honeycomb structure (space group P3m1, No. 156) with optimized lattice constants of a = 7.61 Å and b = 4.39 Å. After surface hydrogenation, the same configuration can be obtained, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The in situ surface adsorption keeps the system [TlPH2 in Fig. 1(b)] with the same space group of P3m1 as TlP. After complete optimization, the lattice constants of TlPH2 are correspondingly transformed to be a = 7.62 Å and b = 4.40 Å, which are in excellent agreement with the lattice constants of TlP. Subsequently, in Fig. 1(c), the minor imaginary frequencies caused by the inaccuracy of the fast Fourier transform grid only appear near the Γ point, which manifests that the phonon frequencies of TlPH2 are all positive in the Brillouin zone and the phonon branches are almost free of any imaginary frequencies. This indicates that TlPH2 is dynamically stable.

FIG. 1.

Geometric structure of pristine TlP (a) and TlPH2 (b) monolayers. Simulated phonon band structures for the TlPH2 monolayer (c).

FIG. 1.

Geometric structure of pristine TlP (a) and TlPH2 (b) monolayers. Simulated phonon band structures for the TlPH2 monolayer (c).

Close modal

The formation energy Ef characterizes the relative stability of the TlPH2 system. The formation energy Ef of the system was calculated using the formula Ef = (EtotalETlP − 2EH2)/8, where Etotal is the total energy of the system, ETlP is the energy of the TlP unit cell, and EH2 is the energy of the free hydrogen molecule. The denominator 8 denotes the total number of atoms in the unit cell. The formation energy value of the TlPH2 system is calculated to be −1.11 eV per atom, and a negative value indicates an exothermic process, indicating that it is the stable structure of the H atom to be adsorbed on TlP. In other words, the TlPH2 system has a lower energy than the pristine TlP system and the H2 molecule.

Shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) are the electronic band structures of TlP and TlPH2. They are semiconductors with direct bandgaps of 0.256 and 0.801 eV calculated from DFT-PBE methods. These bandgaps are evaluated as 0.697 and 1.402 eV under the HSE06 calculation. Thanks to its non-centrosymmetric structure and bandgap, we further study its piezoelectric effect, giving considerable insight into its importance. The previously proposed TlP is confirmed to be a potential piezoelectric material due to its non-centrosymmetric symmetry. In the meantime, we calculated its piezoelectric coefficients, although in acceptable agreement. For this reason, we adopt surface modification by adsorbed hydrogen atoms. The new TlPH2 structure belongs to a non-centrosymmetric space group P3m1 (C3V-1), similar to the primitive crystal structure TlP. Subsequently, to obtain the planar elastic stiffness coefficients C11, C22, and C12 of the systems, we fit its unit-cell energy U to a series of 2D strain states ε11 and ε22 via the below equation:
(1)
where ΔU(ɛ11, ɛ22) = [U(ɛ11, ɛ22) − U(ɛ11 = 0, ɛ22 = 0)] is the change in unit-cell energy per area and A0 is the equilibrium unit-cell area. The atomic positions are fully optimized for each strain state through an experimentally relevant “relaxed-ion” method.
FIG. 2.

Electron band structure of TlP (a) and TlPH2 (b) calculated from both DFT-PBE (black solid lines) and HSE06 (red solid lines) methods.

FIG. 2.

Electron band structure of TlP (a) and TlPH2 (b) calculated from both DFT-PBE (black solid lines) and HSE06 (red solid lines) methods.

Close modal

Our calculated planar stiffness coefficients C11, C22, and C12 for GaP and InP are 62.23 and 62.23, 21.06 and 45.09, and 45.14 and 18.77 N/m, respectively. These results are in excellent agreement with those reported in the previous literature,7 verifying the reasonability of our calculation settings. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the energy vs TlPH2 function of external strains is determined by Eq. (1). Through a quadratic fitting of the results in Fig. 3(a), we can obtain the planar stiffness coefficients C11, C22, and C12 of TlPH2. They are 24.82, 24.90, and 11.88 N/m, respectively, as listed in Table I, together with those of TlP, GaP, and InP for comparison. We calculate C13, C14, C33, and C44 of TlPH2 using DFPT. The results are 0.31, −0.05, 0.22, and 0.002 N/m, respectively. Our calculations, C11 > |C12|, C132<12C33(C11+C12), and C142<12C44(C11C12),31,32 indicate that TlPH2 is also mechanically stable. The elastic stiffness of TlPH2 is greater than that of the corresponding group-III phosphide, as listed in Table I. The changes in elastic stiffness can be understood by shortening the in-layer Tl–P bonds after surface hydrogenation, which induces ionic features in the system through electron transfer. Similar changes can also be noticed in hydrogenating a single layer of h-BN.33 

FIG. 3.

Projections on the ε1 = 0, ε2 = 0, and ε1 = ε2 planes show the quadratic dependence of the energy of the system on the applied strain (a), from where the elastic constants can also be calculated. Change of unit cell polarization per area of TlPH2 with distortion along the x direction after applying uniaxial strain ε11 (b). The piezoelectric coefficients e11 and e31 correspond to the slope of lines obtained through linear fitting of polarization change with respect to ε11.

FIG. 3.

Projections on the ε1 = 0, ε2 = 0, and ε1 = ε2 planes show the quadratic dependence of the energy of the system on the applied strain (a), from where the elastic constants can also be calculated. Change of unit cell polarization per area of TlPH2 with distortion along the x direction after applying uniaxial strain ε11 (b). The piezoelectric coefficients e11 and e31 correspond to the slope of lines obtained through linear fitting of polarization change with respect to ε11.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Calculated elastic stiffness coefficients Cij in N/m, piezoelectric coefficients eij in 10−10 C/m, and dij in pm/V for TlPH2 and other reference systems.

SystemC11C12C22e11e31d11d31
TlP 33.68 14.02 33.68 0.36 −0.13 1.83 −0.27 
TlPH2 24.82 11.88 24.90 −3.20 −0.29 −24.73 −0.79 
GaP 62.23 21.06 62.23 0.38 −0.39 0.92 −0.47 
InP 45.09 18.77 45.14 0.48 −0.33 1.82 −0.52 
GaP7  67.28 21.68 67.28 0.44 −0.45 0.96 −0.51 
InP7  46.22 18.33 46.22 0.40 −0.48 1.45 −0.74 
H–PG–F19     ⋯ 0.97 ⋯ ⋯ 
SystemC11C12C22e11e31d11d31
TlP 33.68 14.02 33.68 0.36 −0.13 1.83 −0.27 
TlPH2 24.82 11.88 24.90 −3.20 −0.29 −24.73 −0.79 
GaP 62.23 21.06 62.23 0.38 −0.39 0.92 −0.47 
InP 45.09 18.77 45.14 0.48 −0.33 1.82 −0.52 
GaP7  67.28 21.68 67.28 0.44 −0.45 0.96 −0.51 
InP7  46.22 18.33 46.22 0.40 −0.48 1.45 −0.74 
H–PG–F19     ⋯ 0.97 ⋯ ⋯ 
Then, we calculate the linear piezoelectric coefficients of TlPH2 through widely used methods for two-dimensional systems, where eijk and dijk are computed as the third-rank tensors as the relative polarization vector Pi (based on the theory34,35 developed by Vanderbilt and King-Smith as implemented in the VASP code) to strains ɛjk and stresses σjk, respectively. Namely, eijk = ∂Pi/∂ɛjk and dijk = ∂Pi/∂σjk. With this 3 m symmetry taken into account, the piezoelectric coefficients of e11, e31, d11, and d31 are non-zero. Using the Voigt notations, the piezoelectric coefficients can be simplified to {e11, e31} and {d11, d31}. Based on the definitions of stain and stress, the relations between {e11, e31} and {d11, d31} can be derived as
(2)
(3)
We then calculate the changes of polarization vectors P1 per unit area of TlPH2 to a series of uniaxial strain states ε11 to evaluate coefficients e11 and e31. The calculated results are shown in Fig. 3(b). By linear fitting the slopes of the results, the piezoelectric coefficients e11 and e31 are evaluated to be −3.20 × 10−10 and −0.29 × 10−10 C/m, respectively. The corresponding coefficients d11 and d31 are also calculated to be −24.73 and −0.79 pm/V. As listed in Table I, we can see that these coefficients are more remarkable than those of group-III phosphides and comparable to those of the surface-modified penta-graphene and Janus group-III chalcogenide monolayers.

Based on first-principles calculations, we identified a new ground-state configuration (TlPH2) for surface-hydrogenated TlP. TlPH2 possesses remarkable energetic and mechanical stability and is confirmed to be dynamically stable. Our results demonstrate that it is a direct bandgap semiconductor with a bandgap of about 0.801 and 1.402 eV calculated from DFT-PBE and HSE06 methods, respectively. Because of its remarkable out-of-plane piezoelectric coefficients d31, TlPH2 is predicted to be an excellent piezoelectric material comparable to other known 2D materials. Its calculated piezoelectric coefficients are more impressive than the theoretical value of the surface-modified penta-graphene and group-III phosphides. These results indicate that TlPH2 is a desirable target for synthesis experiments, with potential applications in sensors, actuators, electric field generators, and any other nano-devices for electrical–mechanical energy conversion. Similar to carbon-bridged oligo(p-phenylenevinylene)s achieving photostable and broadly tunable organic lasers through molecular design,36 our surface hydrogenation strategy demonstrates the effectiveness of chemical modification in tailoring functional properties of low-dimensional materials. Our results confirm that surface modification, namely hydrogen absorption, effectively enhances piezoelectricity in 2D TlP.

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 202303021222282), the Science and Technology Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (Grant No. 2023L415), and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2020A1515110627).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Jia-Bin Li: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review and editing (equal). Yonghua Tang: Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

1.
M. M.
Alyörük
,
Y.
Aierken
,
D.
Çakır
et al, “
Promising piezoelectric performance of single layer transition-metal dichalcogenides and dioxides
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
119
,
23231
(
2015
).
2.
J.
Qi
,
Y. W.
Lan
,
A. Z.
Stieg
et al, “
Piezoelectric effect in chemical vapour deposition-grown atomic-monolayer triangular molybdenum disulfide piezotronics
,”
Nat. Commun.
6
,
7430
(
2015
).
3.
K.
Kaasbjerg
,
K. S.
Thygesen
, and
A. P.
Jauho
, “
Acoustic phonon limited mobility in two-dimensional semiconductors: Deformation potential and piezoelectric scattering in monolayer MoS2 from first principles
,”
Phys. Rev. B
87
,
235312
(
2013
).
4.
A.
Thilagam
, “
Ultrafast exciton relaxation in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
119
,
164306
(
2016
).
5.
K.-A. N.
Duerloo
,
M. T.
Ong
, and
E. J.
Reed
, “
Intrinsic piezoelectricity in two-dimensional materials
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
3
,
2871
(
2012
).
6.
O.
Ambacher
,
J.
Smart
,
J. R.
Shealy
et al, “
Two-dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization charges in N- and Ga-face AlGaN/GaN heterostructures
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
85
,
3222
(
1999
).
7.
R.
Gao
and
Y.
Gao
, “
Piezoelectricity in two-dimensional group III–V buckled honeycomb monolayers
,”
Phys. Status Solidi RRL
11
,
1600412
(
2017
).
8.
J. S.
Speck
and
S. F.
Chichibu
, “
Nonpolar and semipolar group III nitride-based materials
,”
MRS Bull.
34
,
304
(
2009
).
9.
P.
Waltereit
,
O.
Brandt
,
A.
Trampert
et al, “
Nitride semiconductors free of electrostatic fields for efficient white light-emitting diodes
,”
Nature
406
,
865
(
2000
).
10.
F.
Bernardini
and
V.
Fiorentini
, “
Nonlinear behavior of spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization in III–V nitride alloys
,”
Phys. Status Solidi A
190
,
65
(
2002
).
11.
O.
Ambacher
,
B.
Foutz
,
J.
Smart
et al, “
Two dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization in undoped and doped AlGaN/GaN heterostructures
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
87
,
334
(
2000
).
12.
I.
Vurgaftman
,
J. R.
Meyer
, and
L. R.
Ram-Mohan
, “
Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
89
,
5815
(
2001
).
13.
O.
Ambacher
,
R.
Dimitrov
,
M.
Stutzmann
et al, “
Role of spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization induced effects in group-III nitride based heterostructures and devices
,”
Phys. Status Solidi B
216
,
381
(
1999
).
14.
S.
Li
,
Z.
Zhao
,
J.
Li
et al, “
Mechanically induced highly efficient hydrogen evolution from water over piezoelectric SnSe nanosheets
,”
Small
18
,
2202507
(
2022
).
15.
K. B.
Shingare
and
S. I.
Kundalwal
, “
Static and dynamic response of graphene nanocomposite plates with flexoelectric effect
,”
Mech. Mater.
134
,
69
(
2019
).
16.
S.
Chandratre
and
P.
Sharma
, “
Coaxing graphene to be piezoelectric
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
100
,
023114
(
2012
).
17.
S. I.
Kundalwal
,
S. A.
Meguid
, and
G. J.
Weng
, “
Strain gradient polarization in graphene
,”
Carbon
117
,
462
(
2017
).
18.
Y.
Guo
,
S.
Zhou
,
Y.
Bai
, and
J.
Zhao
, “
Enhanced piezoelectric effect in Janus group-III chalcogenide monolayers
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
110
,
163102
(
2017
).
19.
H.-J.
Jia
,
H.-M.
Mu
,
J.-P.
Li
et al, “
Piezoelectric and polarized enhancement by hydrofluorination of penta-graphene
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
20
,
26288
(
2018
).
20.
L.
Li
,
H.
Cao
,
B.
Xu
et al, “
Thermodynamic, structural, and piezoelectric properties of adatom-doped phosphorene and its applications in smart surfaces
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
13
,
054061
(
2020
).
21.
M. T.
Ong
and
E. J.
Reed
, “
Engineered piezoelectricity in graphene
,”
ACS Nano
6
,
1387
(
2012
).
22.
X.
Shang
,
H. N.
Zhang
,
S. T.
Liu
et al, “
Enhanced vertical piezoelectricity in nano-switch diamane structures by super-dipole-moment effect
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
124
,
17
(
2024
).
23.
G.
Kresse
and
J.
Furthmüller
, “
Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set
,”
Comput. Mater. Sci.
6
,
15
(
1996
).
24.
G.
Kresse
and
J.
Furthmüller
, “
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
,”
Phys. Rev. B
54
,
11169
(
1996
).
25.
P. E.
Blöchl
, “
Projector augmented-wave method
,”
Phys. Rev. B
50
,
17953
(
1994
).
26.
J. P.
Perdew
,
K.
Burke
, and
M.
Ernzerhof
, “
Generalized gradient approximation made simple
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
77
,
3865
(
1996
).
27.
A.
Togo
,
F.
Oba
, and
I.
Tanaka
, “
First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures
,”
Phys. Rev. B
78
,
134106
(
2008
).
28.
K.
Parlinski
,
Z. Q.
Li
, and
Y.
Kawazoe
, “
First-principles determination of the soft mode in cubic ZrO2
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
78
,
4063
(
1997
).
29.
J.
Heyd
,
G. E.
Scuseria
, and
M.
Ernzerhof
, “
Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
118
,
8207
(
2003
).
30.
M. T.
Ong
,
K. A. N.
Duerloo
, and
E. J.
Reed
, “
The effect of hydrogen and fluorine coadsorption on the piezoelectric properties of graphene
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
117
,
3615
(
2013
).
31.
F. I.
Fedorov
,
Theory of Elastic Waves in Crystals
(
Springer
,
Berlin
,
1968
).
32.
D. C.
Wallace
,
Thermodynamics of Crystals
(
Wiley
,
New York
,
1972
).
33.
M.
Noor-A-Alam
,
H. J.
Kim
, and
Y. H.
Shin
, “
Dipolar polarization and piezoelectricity of a hexagonal boron nitride sheet decorated with hydrogen and fluorine
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
16
,
6575
(
2014
).
34.
D.
Vanderbilt
and
R. D.
King-Smith
, “
Electric polarization as a bulk quantity and its relation to surface charge
,”
Phys. Rev. B
48
,
4442
(
1993
).
35.
R. D.
King-Smith
and
D.
Vanderbilt
, “
Theory of polarization of crystalline solids
,”
Phys. Rev. B
47
,
1651
(
1993
).
36.
M.
Morales-Vidal
,
P. G.
Boj
,
J. M.
Villalvilla
et al, “
Carbon-bridged oligo(p-phenylenevinylene)s for photostable and broadly tunable, solution-processable thin film organic lasers
,”
Nat. Commun.
6
,
8458
(
2015
).