The integration of electric vehicles (EVs) is becoming vital for both the transportation and energy sectors. At the same time, they need an appropriate charging facility. Photovoltaic (PV) powered electric vehicle chargers are gaining popularity since they require negligible maintenance and steadily enhance the efficiency of PV modules. In this paper, a grid tied solar PV with a 12 pulse Line Commutated Converter (LCC) based off board EV charger is presented. The specialty of the proposed method is that it does not require an extra controller for ac grid synchronization. In addition, simplified maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control is proposed, which will track the MPP of the PV array. The main disadvantage of LCC is its poor harmonics profile, which can be improved by a higher pulse number with adequate phase shift. With 12 pulse LCC, high characteristics harmonics are greatly reduced. The performance and efficacy of the suggested method have been confirmed by simulation, which proves the feasibility of the proposed solution for EV charging in both grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) modes.

There are substantial costs associated with using fossil fuels such as natural gas, oil, and coal that are not accounted for in market prices in terms of the climate, the environment, and human health.1,2 Researchers have been finding out the ways of utilizing green energy resources to satisfy electricity shortages. Undoubtedly, electric vehicles (EVs) have the potential to become progressively crucial in the transportation sector going forward, aiding in mitigating environmental issues and current energy related concerns.3,4

Solar energy is abundant among green energy sources to shift conventional energy sources.5 Solar energy is available on the earth’s surface and depends on climate, geographic location, and the time of day. The global grid that connects the counties is expected to supply surplus electricity generated in sun shining regions to the regions that are in darkness, which will eliminate the need for storage. The global grid will be powered by solar Photovoltaic (PV) panels connected to the globe.6 

Electricity demand is subject to fluctuations on a seasonal basis. In the monsoon season, demand is comparatively lower than it is in summer. In such seasonal variations, PV can effectively fulfill the peak load demand.7,8

A global interlinked network can be technologically feasible and economical. Many opportunities have been initiated from a global interlinked network such as the smooth transfer of the renewable energy supply to fulfill electricity demand over the globe, reducing the need for bulk storage, and reducing the volatility of the energy tariffs.9 The demand for electric vehicles has increased due to government programs, self-driving EVs, and significant technological breakthroughs, which have resulted in a massive growth of EV charging stations worldwide.

Furthermore, the development of intelligent EV charging systems has advanced due to the grid based usage of renewable energy sources.10,11

Since the power from photovoltaic (PV) arrays is produced and consumed within the local area, this type of charging station has a benefit.

For high power, this means that upgrading the transmission lines is not necessary. Additionally, in times of high energy costs, the charging station can operate without drawing electricity from the grid. Another benefit of a charging station based on photovoltaic arrays is its location independence. Coordinated operation of the EV and PV array also avoids the issues brought on by the intermittent nature of PV generation and lessens the impact of PV generation on the energy utilities.12–18 

Due to the fact that these technologies enable electric vehicles to both take electricity from the grid and return extra energy to the grid, grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology account for more than half of the global market for smart grids that charge EVs.19,20 Grid managers have an extra tool to control the supply and demand of electricity owing to this bidirectional energy flow.21–25 

Various operating modes require different converters and controls. Moreover, the charger’s ability to operate is restricted by the availability of the grid (islanded or grid-connected operation), and these factors have an impact on the charger’s overall operational efficiency.26 A lot of work is being performed to create an integrated system that can carry out the aforesaid tasks, which are advantageous for household loads, the grid, and electric vehicles; therefore, off board chargers are more preferred over on board chargers.27,28

Many researchers have reported PV grid interfacing using voltage source converters (VSC).29–31 In terms of high power applications, this topology is well-established and widely accepted, but it has certain limitations. Specifically, it needs specialized control to operate converter power switches and generate synchronous output voltage, which necessitates real and reactive power exchange for compensation.32–34 Phase locked loop (PLL) is used for obtaining synchronizing signals for continuous tracking of power angle and frequency.35 VSC is connected to the ac grid via a series inductive interface, which is crucial to prevent the dc capacitor from short-circuiting and discharging rapidly into a capacitive load like a transmission line. Furthermore, VSC converters need isolation supplies in driver circuits like boost trap circuits.36,37

When reactive power control is not a problem and the amount of reactive power used by the converter is able to be supplied from system capacitors and/or filters, the Line Commutated Converter (LCC) has a decisive economic advantage over a self-commutated converter. LCC is a well-known technique used at the receiving end of an HVDC station. For harmonics and reactive power compensation, passive tuned filters are used.38 

A common mode voltage may be produced by the PV array and grid galvanic connection, leading to the generation of common mode currents. These currents have the potential to introduce electromagnetic interference, distort grid currents, and cause additional losses. To mitigate these issues, a transformer operating at line frequency is incorporated into the grid-tied photovoltaic (PV) system. This transformer provides galvanic isolation between the grid and photovoltaic (PV) array, effectively preventing issues such as dc injection and suppressing leakage currents.39 

This paper realizes the implementation of grid tied solar photovoltaic based off board electric vehicle chargers using 12 pulse LCC, and with 12 pulse LCC, high characteristics harmonics are greatly reduced. In addition, a simplified maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control is proposed that will track the maximum power point (MPP) of the PV array.

The feasibility of the suggested solution is demonstrated through simulation conducted in MATLAB/Simulink. The results validate the efficacy and practicality of the approach in mitigating common mode voltage issues and improving system performance.

The proposed grid tied solar PV system using 12 pulse LCC for off board EV charging is shown in Fig. 1. The proposed solution can provide bidirectional EV charging operation in G2V and V2G mode. A proposed integration scheme utilizes a 12-pulse Line Commutated Converter (LCC) to connect a photovoltaic (PV) system to a grid via a 33 kV/400 V step-down transformer. This configuration enables the solar PV array to deliver 1 MW of power to the grid. The scheme effectively suppresses the dominant 5th and 7th harmonics, significantly reducing the required filter capacity and enhancing power quality delivered to the grid.

FIG. 1.

Proposed methodology of grid tied solar photovoltaic based off board electric vehicle charger.

FIG. 1.

Proposed methodology of grid tied solar photovoltaic based off board electric vehicle charger.

Close modal

When a transformer provides power to a load with a non-sinusoidal current having an RMS value equivalent to the rated current, the dc losses remain consistent. However, the eddy losses in the windings experience an increase as a result of the heightened frequency of harmonics. Consequently, the temperature rise in the winding increases, potentially exceeding temperature limits.

A transformer that needs to supply non-sinusoidal loads shall be oversized in order to guarantee that winding temperature limits are not exceeded in service. The transformer secondary current is non-sinusoidal and consists of harmonics. Harmonics derates transformer. Derating of the transformer is decided by the K-factor. K-factor rated transformers are designed to compensate for the presence of harmonic loading, thereby preventing excess heating. In six pulse transformers, 5th, 7th, 11th, 13th, 17th, and 19th harmonics are predominant. The K-factor is given as per (ANSI/IEEE C57.110) by the following equation:
(1)
where Ih is the load current at the harmonic h.
Total apparent power, which decides the transformer rating, is given by the following equation:
(2)

In the proposed scheme illustrated in Fig. 1, the 12-pulse Line Commutated Converter is operated at a triggering angle of 166°. The value is obtained based on the parameters of the PV panel specified in Table I and an inductance of 0.117 mH, which sets a limit for the firing angle α to prevent commutation failure.

TABLE I.

Ratings of photovoltaic (PV) panel.

Electrical specifications
Rated voltage (Vm73 V 
Rated current (Im6 A 
Open circuit voltage (Voc86 V 
Short circuit current (Isc6.5 A 
Operating conditions Temperature −40 °C to +85 °C 
Electrical specifications
Rated voltage (Vm73 V 
Rated current (Im6 A 
Open circuit voltage (Voc86 V 
Short circuit current (Isc6.5 A 
Operating conditions Temperature −40 °C to +85 °C 
In Fig. 2, Silicon Controlled Rectifier (SCR) switches are used in the LCC converter design, namely T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, and T6 are used to form six pulse bridges. Another six pulse bridge comprises SCR switches T1′, T2′, T3′, T4′, T5′, and T6′ that are connected in cascade with the six pulse bridge to form a 12 pulse LCC. The dc voltage (Vdc) of the 12-pulse LCC, depicted in Fig. 2, Eq. (3), can be reformulated in relation to the line voltage (Vs) and the advance angle (β),
(3)
FIG. 2.

Twelve pulse line commutated converter.

FIG. 2.

Twelve pulse line commutated converter.

Close modal

The calculation of photovoltaic (PV) system requirements is based on referencing the solar panel datasheet provided in Table I, as utilized in previous research.38 These data are employed to determine the quantity of panels required to produce 1 MW of power. Assuming an Earth temperature of 40 °C and a photovoltaic panel temperature of 85 °C, a series connection of 20 PV panels, referred to as a string, is established to obtain the dc link voltage and deliver the required current. To achieve this, 144 such strings are connected in parallel.

The number of photovoltaic panels in series is given by the following equation:
(4)
The number of photovoltaic panels in parallel is given by the following equation:
(5)

1. DC–DC converter control

In Fig. 3, the dc–dc converter control is shown. The control diagram shown in Fig. 3 is used in the bidirectional buck boost converter. This converter is used to regulate the battery charging and discharging current. When the battery is charging from the grid, in that case the dc-dc converter is operated in buck mode, and the EV battery is charging as shown in Fig. 3(a). When the EV battery is discharging and sending power into the grid, in that case, the dc–dc converter is operated in buck mode, and the EV battery is discharging as shown in Fig. 3(b).

FIG. 3.

Control logic for bidirectional buck-boost converter: (a) Battery charging and (b) battery discharging.

FIG. 3.

Control logic for bidirectional buck-boost converter: (a) Battery charging and (b) battery discharging.

Close modal

2. Power rating of electric vehicle battery charger

Based on the power ratings, EV battery chargers can be divided into level 1, level 2, and level 3. Table II describes the three different power levels.

TABLE II.

Different charging power levels. Boldface row of Table II denotes that the level 2 type of charger is suitable for the proposed scheme design

Power levelTypical powerCharging time
Level 1 1–2 kW 4–11 h 
Level 2 322 kW 14 h 
Level 3 30–360 kW <30 min 
Power levelTypical powerCharging time
Level 1 1–2 kW 4–11 h 
Level 2 322 kW 14 h 
Level 3 30–360 kW <30 min 
As per the proposed scheme designed in MATLAB Simulink, the battery current is 20 A and the dc link voltage is 400 V,

Level 2 chargers above 10 kW are recommended for the proposed design.

The control characteristics of both stations of HVDC are given in Fig. 4. The converter operates in three modes in HVDC transmission. (i) Constant ignition angle α (minimum) mode, (ii) Constant Current (CC) mode, and (iii) extinction angle control. The interaction of two characteristics (point A) determines the mode of operation. Similarly, PV array (like sending end station) and grid connected LCC (like receiving end of HVDC station) characteristics are given in Fig. 5. Operating point A or A′ depends on irradiation, temperature, and solar azimuth angle. As irradiation changes, the voltage corresponding to maximum power also changes by varying the firing angle of LCC. Figure 6 shows the surface plot of I–V characteristics and firing angle intersection at maximum power point. The intersection of firing angle and I–V characteristics justifies the maximum power tracking at each value of solar irradiance is possible, and the operation of 12p-LCC is maintained at maximum power as shown in Fig. 7.

FIG. 4.

Control characteristics of HVDC station.

FIG. 4.

Control characteristics of HVDC station.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

PV and LCC characteristics.

FIG. 5.

PV and LCC characteristics.

Close modal
FIG. 6.

Intersection of I–V characteristics and firing angle.

FIG. 6.

Intersection of I–V characteristics and firing angle.

Close modal
FIG. 7.

MPPT tracking in LCC based PV interface.

FIG. 7.

MPPT tracking in LCC based PV interface.

Close modal

The Perturb and Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance algorithms find widespread application, approaches that rely on the “hill-climbing” technique.40 

The disadvantage of both approaches, despite their simplicity and minimal processing power requirements, is that MPP might become lost or tracked in the incorrect direction when air conditions change quickly.

These drawbacks are completely eliminated in the proposed MPPT control, in which hill climbing is automatically performed because there is a ripple present in the dc link voltage of LCC, which hill climbs the PV power and makes PV power variable. There is no need for a dedicated algorithm or controller to track the MPP of the PV array. In addition, during rapidly changing atmospheric conditions, MPP will not be lost or tracked in the wrong direction, and only a comparator is required to achieve the MPP of the PV array.

An algorithm based on the hill climbing concept includes changes in power in steps. It may lead in the wrong direction due to the rapid change in irradiance. In the proposed technique, the converter is operated at a firing angle for which the segment of ac source appears at the converter output, which contains ripple and changes at periodic intervals.

The suggested grid-tied solar PV system employing a 12-pLCC is thoroughly examined through a MATLAB Simulink model. The voltage supplied by the grid is 33 kV with a frequency of 50 Hz. The primary side of the transformer represents the grid supply line voltage, whereas each secondary side of the transformer operates at 440 V.

Table III shows the system parameters considered for the simulation of the proposed methodology.

TABLE III.

System parameters.

Proposed methodology specifications
Grid voltage (Vg) 33 kV 
Line frequency (f) 50 Hz 
DC link voltage (Vdc400 V 
Switching frequency 10 KHz 
Filter inductance (Lf4 mH 
Filter capacitance (Cf6.3 uF 
DC link capacitor (Cdc5.6 mF 
Battery side capacitor (Cb0.1 mF 
DC link inductor (L) 20 mH 
Battery current (ibat) 20 A 
Battery nominal voltage (Vbat) 172 V 
Proposed methodology specifications
Grid voltage (Vg) 33 kV 
Line frequency (f) 50 Hz 
DC link voltage (Vdc400 V 
Switching frequency 10 KHz 
Filter inductance (Lf4 mH 
Filter capacitance (Cf6.3 uF 
DC link capacitor (Cdc5.6 mF 
Battery side capacitor (Cb0.1 mF 
DC link inductor (L) 20 mH 
Battery current (ibat) 20 A 
Battery nominal voltage (Vbat) 172 V 

Figure 8(a) displays the solar PV voltage at the constant irradiance specified. Figure 8(b) illustrates the voltage across the dc link of LCC, while the current flowing through the dc link of LCC is illustrated in Fig. 8(c). Notably, in Fig. 8(b), the dc link voltage is negative due to the triggering angle surpassing 90°, resulting in a negative average dc voltage and requiring a dc source for bridge operation. This indicates power supply to the ac grid, signifying the converter is operating in inverting mode.

FIG. 8.

(a) Solar PV voltage at constant irradiance of 1000 W/m2, (b) voltage across the dc link of LCC, and (c) current flowing through the dc link of LCC.

FIG. 8.

(a) Solar PV voltage at constant irradiance of 1000 W/m2, (b) voltage across the dc link of LCC, and (c) current flowing through the dc link of LCC.

Close modal

In Fig. 9(a), the phase voltage is depicted on the 33 kV ac side, while Fig. 9(b) illustrates the current on the same side. Figure 10(a) illustrates the harmonic profile of the current on the 33 kV ac side without the presence of a capacitor bank and filter, while Fig. 10(b) illustrates the same with a capacitor bank and filter. Comparing the two, it is evident that utilizing filters and a capacitor bank reduces Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) from 11.56% to 3.52%. Figure 11(a) demonstrates active, reactive, and apparent power on the 33 kV grid under constant irradiance. Figure 11(b) shows the same with varying irradiance, indicating negative active power due to unidirectional current flow and negative average dc voltage. Notably, the negative active power in both figures is attributed to unidirectional current flow and a negative average dc voltage.

FIG. 9.

(a) Phase voltage at 33 kV ac grid and (b) current at 33 kV ac grid.

FIG. 9.

(a) Phase voltage at 33 kV ac grid and (b) current at 33 kV ac grid.

Close modal
FIG. 10.

Harmonic profile comparison of (a) current on the 33 kV ac grid without a capacitor bank and filter, and (b) current on the 33 kV ac grid with a capacitor bank and filter.

FIG. 10.

Harmonic profile comparison of (a) current on the 33 kV ac grid without a capacitor bank and filter, and (b) current on the 33 kV ac grid with a capacitor bank and filter.

Close modal
FIG. 11.

(a) Power on the 33 kV ac grid under constant irradiance of 1000 W/m2 and (b) power on the 33 kV ac grid under varying irradiances of 1000, 900, and 800 W/m2.

FIG. 11.

(a) Power on the 33 kV ac grid under constant irradiance of 1000 W/m2 and (b) power on the 33 kV ac grid under varying irradiances of 1000, 900, and 800 W/m2.

Close modal

The simulation results depicting the Grid-to-Vehicle (G2V) and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) modes of operation of the EV battery using the proposed methodology are displayed in Figs. 12 and 13, respectively. Here, the EV’s nominal battery voltage is considered as 160 V, and the dc link voltage (Vdc) is set at 400 V. Figure 12(a) shows both grid current and grid voltage are in phase, hence power is received by the EV battery from the grid. Figure 12(b) shows the dc link voltage Vdc, which is maintained at 400 V. This is accomplished with a suitable current control scheme. Figure 12(c) shows the EV battery voltage of ∼172 V and the fully charged voltage of the battery is 186 V. Figure 12(d) shows the EV battery current, which is −20 A as the battery is charging from the grid.

FIG. 12.

EV receives power from the grid (G2V): (a) Grid voltage and grid current, (b) dc voltage, (c) EV voltage, and (d) EV current.

FIG. 12.

EV receives power from the grid (G2V): (a) Grid voltage and grid current, (b) dc voltage, (c) EV voltage, and (d) EV current.

Close modal
FIG. 13.

EV transfers power to the grid (V2G): (a) Grid voltage and grid current, (b) dc voltage, (c) EV voltage, and (d) EV current.

FIG. 13.

EV transfers power to the grid (V2G): (a) Grid voltage and grid current, (b) dc voltage, (c) EV voltage, and (d) EV current.

Close modal

Figure 13(a) shows both grid current and grid voltage are out of phase, hence power is transferred from the EV battery to the grid. Figure 13(b) shows the dc link voltage Vdc, which is maintained at 400 V. This is accomplished with a suitable current control scheme. Figure 13(c) shows the EV battery voltage of ∼172 V and the fully charged voltage of the battery is 186 V. Figure 13(d) shows the EV battery current, which is 20 A as the battery is discharging and sending power to the grid.

A grid tied solar photovoltaic based off board electric vehicle charger using 12p-LCC in G2V and V2G mode is proposed in this paper. The suggested solution eliminates the need for a separate circuit to keep the converter and ac grid in synchronization. Solar PV MPPT tracking is achieved by the 12p-LCC converter triggering controller itself. A 400 V dc link voltage is used to simulate charging a 160 V electric vehicle battery. The feasibility of the proposed scheme is demonstrated by the grid-to-vehicle mode of operation and the vehicle-to-grid mode of operation. Grid current has a THD value of 3.52%, which meets the IEEE-519 standards.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Jyoti M. Kumbhare: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Sumant G. Kadwane: Supervision (equal); Visualization (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

1.
J.
Antoun
,
M.
Kabir
,
R.
Atallah
et al, “
Assisting residential distribution grids in overcoming large-scale EV preconditioning load
,”
IEEE Syst. J.
16
(
3
),
4345
4355
(
2022
).
2.
A.
Verma
and
B.
Singh
, “
AFF-SOGI-DRC control of renewable energy based grid interactive charging station for EV with power quality improvement
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.
57
(
1
),
588
597
(
2021
).
3.
A.
Ghazanfari
and
C.
Perreault
, “
The path to a vehicle-to-grid future: Powering electric mobility forward
,”
IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag.
16
(
3
),
4
13
(
2022
).
4.
P.
Shukl
and
B.
Singh
, “
Distributed energy resources based EV charging station with seamless connection to grid
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.
59
(
3
),
3826
3836
(
2023
).
5.
R.
Saravanan
,
S.
Kaliappan
,
V.
Jayaprakasan
, and
P.
Maniraj
, “
A hybrid strategy for mitigating unbalance and improving voltage considering higher penetration of electric vehicles and distributed generation
,”
Sustain. Cities Soc.
76
,
103489
(
2022
).
6.
N.
Panossian
,
M.
Muratori
,
B.
Palmintier
,
A.
Meintz
,
T.
Lipman
, and
K.
Moffat
, “
Challenges and opportunities of integrating electric vehicles in electricity distribution systems
,”
Curr. Sustainable/Renewable Energy Rep.
9
(
2
),
27
40
(
2022
).
7.
L.
Huang
,
D.
Chen
,
C. S.
Lai
,
Z.
Huang
,
A. F.
Zobaa
, and
L. L.
Lai
, “
A distributed optimization model for mitigating three-phase power imbalance with electric vehicles and grid battery
,”
Electr. Power Syst. Res.
210
,
108080
(
2022
).
8.
A.
Pal
,
A.
Bhattacharya
, and
A. K.
Chakraborty
, “
Placement of electric vehicle charging station and solar distributed generation in distribution system considering uncertainties
,”
Sci. Iran.
30
(
1
),
183
206
(
2023
).
9.
R. S.
Archana
,
R.
Shankar
, and
S.
Singh
, “
Development of smart grid for the power sector in India
,”
Cleaner Energy Syst.
2
,
100011
(
2022
).
10.
P.
Barman
,
L.
Dutta
,
S.
Bordoloi
,
A.
Kalita
,
P.
Buragohain
,
S.
Bharali
, and
B.
Azzopardi
, “
Renewable energy integration with electric vehicle technology: A review of the existing smart charging approaches
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
183
,
113518
(
2023
).
11.
R.
Khan
,
K. K.
Mehmood
,
S. B. A.
Bukhari
,
K.
Imran
,
A.
Wadood
,
S. B.
Rhee
, and
S.
Park
, “
An optimization-based reliability enhancement scheme for active distribution systems utilizing electric vehicles
,”
IEEE Access
9
,
157247
157258
(
2021
).
12.
A.
Srivastava
,
M.
Manas
, and
R. K.
Dubey
, “
Electric vehicle integration’s impacts on power quality in distribution network and associated mitigation measures: A review
,”
J. Eng. Appl. Sci.
70
(
1
),
32
(
2023
).
13.
B.
Zafar
and
S. A. B.
Slama
, “
PV-EV integrated home energy management using vehicle-to-home (V2H) technology and household occupant behaviors
,”
Energy Strategy Rev.
44
,
101001
(
2022
).
14.
S.
Sagaria
,
G.
Duarte
,
D.
Neves
, and
P.
Baptista
, “
Photovoltaic integrated electric vehicles: Assessment of synergies between solar energy, vehicle types and usage patterns
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
348
,
131402
(
2022
).
15.
N.
Himabindu
,
S.
Hampannavar
,
B.
Deepa
, and
M.
Swapna
, “
Analysis of microgrid integrated photovoltaic (PV) powered electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) under different solar irradiation conditions in India: A way towards sustainable development and growth
,”
Energy Rep.
7
,
8534
8547
(
2021
).
16.
J.
Alok
and
S.
Bhullar
, “
Operating modes of grid integrated PV-solar based electric vehicle charging system-A comprehensive review
,”
e-Prime-Adv. Electr. Eng., Electron. Energy
8
,
100519
(
2024
).
17.
H.
Turker
and
M.
Ponzio
, “
New predictive control method for optimal minimization of plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging cost with vehicle-to-home (V2H) capability
,” in
11th IEEE International Conference SMART GRID-ICRERA
(
IEEE
,
2023
).
18.
D.
Mazzeo
,
N.
Matera
,
R.
De Luca
, and
R.
Musmanno
, “
A smart algorithm to optimally manage the charging strategy of the Home to Vehicle (H2V) and Vehicle to Home (V2H) technologies in an off-grid home powered by renewable sources
,”
Energy Syst.
15
(
2
),
715
752
(
2024
).
19.
V. K.
Manickam
and
K.
Dhayalini
, “
Hybrid optimized control of bidirectional off-board electric vehicle battery charger integrated with vehicle-to-grid
,”
J. Energy Storage
86
,
111008
(
2024
).
20.
I.
Ahmed
,
H. M. M.
Adil
,
S.
Ahmed
,
I.
Ahmad
, and
Z.
Rehman
, “
Robust nonlinear control of battery electric vehicle charger in grid to vehicle and vehicle to grid applications
,”
J. Energy Storage
52
,
104813
(
2022
).
21.
R. K.
Lenka
and
A. K.
Panda
, “
Grid power quality improvement using a vehicle‐to‐grid enabled bidirectional off‐board electric vehicle battery charger
,”
Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl.
49
(
8
),
2612
2629
(
2021
).
22.
I.
Ahmed
,
M.
Adnan
,
M.
Ali
, and
G.
Kaddoum
, “
Supertwisting sliding mode controller for grid-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-grid battery electric vehicle charger
,”
J. Energy Storage
70
,
107914
(
2023
).
23.
K. M.
Tan
,
V. K.
Ramachandaramurthy
,
J. Y.
Yong
, and
M.
Tariq
, “
Experimental verification of a flexible vehicle-to-grid charger for power grid load variance reduction
,”
Energy
228
,
120560
(
2021
).
24.
T. J. C.
Sousa
,
V.
Monteiro
,
S.
Coelho
,
L.
Machado
,
D.
Pedrosa
, and
J. L.
Afonso
, “
Electric vehicle battery charging station based on bipolar dc power grid with grid-to-vehicle, vehicle-to-grid and vehicle-to-vehicle capabilities
,”
EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web.
9
(
5
),
e5
(
2023
).
25.
R. K.
Lenka
,
A. K.
Panda
,
A. R.
Dash
,
N. N.
Venkataramana
, and
N.
Tiwary
, “
Reactive power compensation using vehicle-to-grid enabled bidirectional off-board EV battery charger
,” in
2021 1st International Conference on Power Electronics and Energy (ICPEE)
(
IEEE
,
2021
), pp.
1
6
.
26.
Y.
Toghani Holari
,
S. A.
Taher
, and
M.
Mehrasa
, “
Power management using robust control strategy in hybrid microgrid for both grid-connected and islanding modes
,”
J. Energy Storage
39
,
102600
(
2021
).
27.
R. K.
Lenka
,
A. K.
Panda
,
L.
Senapati
, and
N.
Tiwary
, “
Multifunctional PV-integrated bidirectional off-board EV battery charger targeting smart cities
,” in
Wind and Solar Energy Applications
(
CRC Press
,
2023
), pp.
267
279
.
28.
A. K.
Seth
and
M.
Singh
, “
Unified adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system control for OFF board electric vehicle charger
,”
Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
130
,
106896
(
2021
).
29.
H.
Shadabi
and
I.
Kamwa
, “
Dual adaptive nonlinear droop control of VSC-MTDC system for improved transient stability and provision of primary frequency support
,”
IEEE Access
9
,
76806
76815
(
2021
).
30.
B.
Zhang
,
F.
Gao
,
Y.
Zhang
,
D.
Liu
, and
H.
Tang
, “
An AC-DC coupled droop control strategy for VSC-based DC microgrids
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
37
(
6
),
6568
6584
(
2022
).
31.
G.
Lin
,
J.
Liu
,
C.
Rehtanz
,
C.
Li
,
Y.
Li
, and
P.
Wang
, “
Inertia droop control and stability mechanism analysis of energy storage systems for dc-busbar electric vehicle charging station
,”
IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif.
9
(
1
),
266
282
(
2023
).
32.
C.
Zhang
,
R.
Sheinberg
,
S.
Narayana Gowda
,
M.
Sherman
,
A.
Ahmadian
, and
R.
Gadh
, “
A novel large-scale EV charging scheduling algorithm considering V2G and reactive power management based on ADMM
,”
Front. Energy Res.
11
,
1078027
(
2023
).
33.
M.
Schilcher
,
S.
Neff
, and
J.
Muenderlein
, “
Controlling the reactive power demand of a distribution grid by coordinated action of electric vehicle chargers
,”
Energies
16
(
14
),
5502
(
2023
).
34.
B.
Jangid
,
P.
Mathuria
, and
V.
Gupta
, “
Reactive DLMP for hierarchical energy management and optimal reactive power response from EVs
,” in
2022 22nd National Power Systems Conference (NPSC)
(
IEEE
,
2022
), pp.
278
283
.
35.
S.
Gautam
,
W.
Xiao
,
D. D. C.
Lu
,
H.
Ahmed
, and
J. M.
Guerrero
, “
Development of frequency-fixed all-pass filter-based single-phase phase-locked loop
,”
IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron.
10
(
1
),
506
517
(
2022
).
36.
X.
Wang
,
M.
Chen
,
B.
Li
,
G.
Zhu
,
L.
Chen
,
X.
Sun
,
D.
Zhang
, and
J.
Hu
, “
Control and modulation of a single-phase AC/DC converter with smooth bidirectional mode switching and symmetrical decoupling voltage compensation
,”
IEEE Trans. Power Electron.
37
(
4
),
3836
3853
(
2022
).
37.
M.
Baharizadeh
,
H. R.
Karshenas
, and
M. S.
Golsorkhi Esfahani
, “
Control method for improvement of power quality in single interlinking converter hybrid AC‐DC microgrids
,”
IET Smart Grid
4
(
4
),
414
428
(
2021
).
38.
T.
Shanthi
and
S. U.
Prabha
, “
MPPT controller based on fuzzy logic for photovoltaic systems using line-commutated inverter and sepic converter
,”
J. Electr. Eng.
21
(
1
),
11
(
2021
).
39.
K.
Jiang
,
D.
Liu
,
K.
Cao
,
P.
Hu
,
P.
Xiong
, and
Y.
Wu
, “
Small-signal modeling and wide-band oscillation analysis with the high proportion of renewable energy integrated through LCC-HVDC
,”
Front. Energy Res.
11
,
1168274
(
2023
).
40.
L.
Alkhawaldeh
,
M. A.
Bhuiya
,
M.
Eid
, and
M. Z.
Youssef
, “
An enhanced EPP-MPPT algorithm with modified control technique in solar-based inverter applications: Analysis and experimentation
,”
IEEE Access
9
,
8158
8166
(
2021
).