In order to obtain a flexible strain sensor with higher sensitivity, a resistive flexible strain sensor based on the AgNWs-graphene-PDMS sensitive layer is prepared in this paper. This paper presents the preparation of a flexible sensitive layer, the preparation and encapsulation of the flexible strain sensor, and the performance tests of the sensor prepared with AgNWs-graphene (AgNWs-Gr) mixtures at different concentrations. The test results indicate that the prepared sensor has a wide detection range with a maximum stretchable length of 118%. The flexible strain sensor prepared with the AgNWs-Gr mixture at a concentration of 5% has the highest sensitivity and the maximum strain sensitivity of up to 236. It also has good repeatability, stability, and rapid response, and it has been tested for practical applications. The results show that the flexible strain sensor has a broad application prospect in fields such as wearable devices and intelligent robots.

With the advancement of wearable devices,1,2 intelligent robots,3,4 medical monitoring devices,5,6 and electronic skins,7,8 the core technology—flexible pressure sensors—has attracted a lot of attention.9–11 Among multiple flexible sensors, flexible strain sensors have been widely applied in wearable devices, smart textiles, and human health monitoring due to its good flexibility and stretchability and its ability to adapt to objects of different shapes and sizes.12–15 According to the sensor mechanism, flexible strain sensors can be categorized into capacitive,16 resistive,17 and piezoelectric ones,18 and resistive flexible strain sensors have become a research hotspot for scholars and researchers due to their simple structure, high sensitivity, low cost, and rapid response.19–22 

Resistive flexible strain sensors are based on the principle of resistance change, and the basic mechanism is to detect variations in strain by changing the resistance value of the resistive material.23,24 Resistive flexible strain sensors generally consist of a layer of flexible resistive material and two electrodes. When the sensor is subjected to strain, the length and cross-sectional area of the resistive material change, resulting in a change in its resistance value that can be detected by measuring the voltage or current between the electrodes.25–28 In general, such sensors contain materials such as metal nanoparticles, metal nanowires, carbon nanotubes, and graphene as resistive elements. In particular, graphene and silver nanowires are widely used in flexible strain sensors due to their good electrical conductivity, mechanical properties, optical properties, chemical stability, and biocompatibility.29–33 

In this paper, a resistive flexible strain sensor based on the AgNWs-graphene-PDMS (AGP) sensitive layer is prepared with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)34 as the substrate material and graphene (Gr) and silver nanowires (AgNWs) as the conductive material. The strain-sensitive layer is prepared by the spraying process, and the encapsulation is carried out by the spin-coating process. At the same time, the performance of the sensor prepared by the AGP sensitive layer is also tested. The results show that the sensor features simple preparation, high sensitivity, good repeatability, and stability.

The preparation process of the strain sensitive layer is shown in Fig. 1. Take PDMS (20 ml) and hardener (2 ml) for proportioning, and stir the mixed liquid for 2 h with a magnetic stirrer such that the air inside the liquid is discharged; pour the stirred mixture onto a glass sheet, and place it on a homogenizer to rotate at 300 rpm for 30 s to obtain a uniformly distributed PDMS pre-film. Then place it on a heating table and heat for 2 h at 80 °C to solidify the PDMS, and the PDMS film is obtained for use.

FIG. 1.

Preparation of the strain sensor with the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer.

FIG. 1.

Preparation of the strain sensor with the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer.

Close modal

Add Gr (2 g) and AgNWs (2 g) to a beaker with 100 ml of ethanol to obtain AgNWs-graphene (AgNWs-Gr) mixture at a concentration of 2%; in the same way, AgNWs-Gr mixtures at concentrations of 3%, 4%, 5%, and 6% are obtained. The beaker containing the AgNWs-Gr mixture is placed on a magnetic stirrer for 2 h to fully mix the silver nanowires, graphene, and ethanol, and for 2 h for ultrasonic processing to have homogeneously dispersed AgNWs and Gr. The processed AgNWs-Gr mixture is sprayed on the prepared PDMS film with a spray gun and placed on a heating table and heated at 120 °C for 2 h so that the ethanol is fully volatilized. The AgNWs-Gr mixture is fully dried and adhered to the PDMS film, and the strain-sensitive layer required herein is obtained. The strain-sensitive layer prepared as mentioned above is placed on the operation platform. Two sections of copper foil tape are used as the electrodes of this sensor, and two wires are connected for subsequent measurements. A layer of PDMS is spin-coated again on the sprayed AgNWs-Gr-PDMS and heated at 80 °C for 2 h to solidify the PDMS. In this way, a resistive flexible strain sensor based on the AGP sensitive layer is fabricated by peeling it off the substrate.

The microstructure characterization of the prepared AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer is shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that AgNWs and graphene are uniformly and densely dispersed on the PDMS film, and these two materials cross and overlap with each other to achieve good conductivity. It can be observed that AgNWs and graphene are interwoven and embedded to form a complete conductive network.

FIG. 2.

Characterization of the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer.

FIG. 2.

Characterization of the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer.

Close modal
In order to analyze the conductivity characteristics of the prepared sensor well, we established an equivalent model of the sensor, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The upper and lower layers are equivalent to resistors, which are represented by R1 and R2, respectively. The AgNWs between two layers of graphene can be regarded as conductive connections between equivalent resistances, represented by R3 and R4, respectively. The equivalent circuit of the sensor is shown in Fig. 3(b). Figure 3(b) depicts the electronic model of the sensor, and the resistance can be represented by Eq. (1). When the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer is in its initial state, the equivalent resistance of the sensor is minimized. When the sensor is stretched, the connection between AgNWs and graphene gradually weakens, and gaps appear, leading to an increase in the equivalent resistance of the sensor. As the strain gradually decreases, the sensor returns to its initial state. This process is shown in Figs. 3(c)3(e). From a microscopic perspective, graphene sheets are stacked together in their initial state, and AgNWs are randomly distributed between graphene sheets. AgNWs have a very small resistance in their initial state. In the low strain range, the overlapping area of graphene sheets gradually decreases and some cracks are generated, and AgNWs can fill these cracks. Therefore, in the low strain range, the change in resistance value is relatively small. As the strain gradually increases, AgNWs cannot fully fill these cracks, resulting in a further increase in resistance value of the strain sensor. To have a larger strain test range, PDMS with excellent stretchability is used as the substrate material and encapsulation material for the flexible strain sensor; hence, the sensor has good response and recovery characteristics,
(1)
FIG. 3.

Sensing mechanism of the flexible strain sensor. (a) Schematic of each section equivalent resistance for the AgNWs-Gr strain sensor. (b) Equivalent electronic module of the strain sensor. (c)–(e) Schematic of the strain sensor during the stretching and releasing processes.

FIG. 3.

Sensing mechanism of the flexible strain sensor. (a) Schematic of each section equivalent resistance for the AgNWs-Gr strain sensor. (b) Equivalent electronic module of the strain sensor. (c)–(e) Schematic of the strain sensor during the stretching and releasing processes.

Close modal

The testing platform for the flexible strain sensor consists of a digital tensile machine, a digital multimeter, a caliper, and an upper computer, as shown in Fig. 4. The fixture is used to clamp both ends of the prepared flexible strain sensor, the upper computer and the digital multimeter are connected to the flexible strain sensor, the digital tensile machine is used to provide the flexible strain sensor with different tensions, and the caliper is used to measure the tensile length of the flexible strain sensor. The tension displayed by the digital tensile machine, the resistance value at the corresponding moment displayed by the upper computer, and the corresponding measurement value of the caliper are recorded in real time and calculated to obtain the sensitivity, response time, test range, and other data of the flexible strain sensor.

FIG. 4.

Performance testing platform for the flexible strain sensor.

FIG. 4.

Performance testing platform for the flexible strain sensor.

Close modal
The sensitivity of the resistive flexible strain sensor is calculated by
(2)
where, S represents the sensitivity, ΔR represents the resistance change of the sensor after applying tension, ε represents the relative change in the tensile length of the sensor, R0 represents the resistance when no tension is applied, R represents the resistance after being stretched, and the value of S is dimensionless. It can be seen that when the flexible strain sensor is operating with a certain strain, the larger the change in resistance value, the higher the sensitivity of the sensor.

To test the influence of different AgNWs-Gr concentrations on the sensitivity of the flexible strain sensor, the flexible strain sensors prepared with five different AgNWs-Gr concentrations (2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, and 6%) are subjected to strain tests in this paper, and the curves obtained from the tests are shown in Fig. 5(a). As can be seen from Fig. 5(a), the flexible strain sensor prepared with a concentration of 6% AgNWs-Gr mixture has the highest sensitivity since as the concentration of the AgNWs-Gr mixture increases, the number of AgNWs-Gr on the strain-sensitive layer increases, and the better the electrical conductivity is, the higher the rate of change in the resistance of the resistive flexible strain sensor is under the application of the same tensile force, and thus the higher the sensitivity is.

FIG. 5.

Strain sensor characteristics with the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer: (a) resistance variation with different AgNWs-Gr mixtures as a function of applied strain. (b) The strain sensitivity of the sensor. (c) Dynamic stretching/releasing strain with different values. (d) Resistance response curve of the strain sensor over 500 cycles with a strain of 80%. (e) The response time and the recovery time of the sensor. (f) The relative resistance change of the strain sensor for the first cycle.

FIG. 5.

Strain sensor characteristics with the AgNWs-Gr sensitive layer: (a) resistance variation with different AgNWs-Gr mixtures as a function of applied strain. (b) The strain sensitivity of the sensor. (c) Dynamic stretching/releasing strain with different values. (d) Resistance response curve of the strain sensor over 500 cycles with a strain of 80%. (e) The response time and the recovery time of the sensor. (f) The relative resistance change of the strain sensor for the first cycle.

Close modal

Figure 5(b) presents the test results of the relative resistance rate of change of the flexible strain sensor. It can be seen from Fig. 5(b) that the relative resistance rate of change is low at a stretch degree of 0%–50%, and its sensitivity is 5; at a stretch degree of 50%–100%, the relative resistance rate of change is slightly increased, and its sensitivity is 41; the relative resistance rate of change is the highest at a stretch degree of 100%–120%, and its sensitivity is 236. This is because under small tension, the structure of the flexible strain sensor undergoes small changes and the strain of the strain-sensitive layer is small, resulting in a low relative resistance rate of change and low sensitivity. Similarly, under large tension, the structure of the flexible strain sensor undergoes large deformation and the strain of the strain-sensitive layer is large, resulting in a large relative resistance rate of change and high sensitivity.

To test the repeatability of the sensor under different stretching conditions, the sensor is stretched by 30%–110%; the test is repeated five times, and the test results are shown in Fig. 5(c). It can be seen that the small deviations of waveform and the peak indicate a small error in the resistance value of the flexible strain sensor, which shows that the sensor has good repeatability.

To test the stability of the sensor in different stretching situations, the flexible strain sensor is stretched by 80%; the test is repeated more than 500 times, and the test results are obtained as shown in Fig. 5(d). It can be seen from Fig. 5(c) that the sensor has similar waveforms and similar peaks under the repeated application of the same pressure, indicating that the sensor has good stability. Through testing, the flexible strain sensor described in this paper breaks at a tensile degree of 118%, and the resistive strain sensor has a larger strain range (0%–118%) than conventional flexible strain sensors.

In addition to parameters such as sensitivity, repeatability, and stability, to measure the excellence of a flexible strain sensor, response time is also an important element. The flexible strain sensor is rapidly stretched to 80% and rapidly released for recovery when the digital multimeter shows a smooth value. By virtue of testing and analysis, the response time of the sensor is 83 ms, and the recovery time is 116 ms, as shown in Fig. 5(e). The sensor exhibits excellent stability and recoverability when applying strain and releasing strain, as is shown in Fig. 5(f).

It can be seen from the above-mentioned tests that the resistive flexible strain sensor has characteristics of high sensitivity, rapid response time, simple preparation, good repeatability, stability, etc. It can be applied in practical applications in view of its excellent performance, with the application directions to be determined by the testing data of the sensor in practical applications. Although the resistive flexible strain sensor has high sensitivity under large tensile forces, the range, linearity, and stability of the sensor require to be considered in practical applications. At the same time, large tensile forces may cause structural damage or fatigue failure of the flexible strain sensor.

The resistive flexible strain sensor described in this paper is tightly attached to the joint of the index finger and connected to a digital multimeter. The finger is bent to different angles (30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°), and the resistance value is recorded and tested using the digital multimeter and the upper computer in real time. The curves are shown in Fig. 6. It can be seen that the resistive flexible strain sensor can accurately monitor the finger bending changes in real time and have a broad application prospect in the fields of intelligent robots and wearable devices. To further investigate the performance of this sensor, we attached the sensor to the skin of the face. The resistance value of the sensor changes with the smile, as shown in Fig. 6(b).

FIG. 6.

(a) Finger bending measurement of the flexible strain sensor. (b) Smiling motion detection on the skin.

FIG. 6.

(a) Finger bending measurement of the flexible strain sensor. (b) Smiling motion detection on the skin.

Close modal

By attaching the strain sensor to the throat, speech recognition can be achieved through the vibration of the vocal cords. The sensor can distinguish different English words, such as A and interesting, and the results are shown in Fig. 7.

FIG. 7.

Strain sensor attached to the throat to detect different words: (a) A; (b) interesting.

FIG. 7.

Strain sensor attached to the throat to detect different words: (a) A; (b) interesting.

Close modal

In this paper, a resistive flexible strain sensor based on the AGP sensitive layer is prepared with PDMS as the substrate material, AgNWs and Gr as the conductive materials. The strain-sensitive layer is prepared by the spraying process, and encapsulation is carried out by the spin-coating process. The performance of the sensor prepared with different concentrations of the AgNWs-Gr mixtures is also tested. The results show that the prepared resistive flexible strain sensor has the highest sensitivity of up to 236 with the AgNWs-Gr mixture at a concentration of 6%, the flexible strain sensor has rapid response time (83 ms) and recovery time (116 ms), and the flexible strain sensor also has good repeatability and stability. Given the excellent performance of the flexible strain sensor, it is placed at the finger joints for practical testing. According to the analysis on the detected data, the flexible strain sensor can accurately monitor the finger bending changes in real time and have a broad application prospect in intelligent robots, wearable devices, electronic skin, and so on.

This work was supported by the Tai Yuan Institute of Technology Scientific Research Initial Funding, Grant No. 2023KJ016.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

All works with relation to this paper have been accomplished by all authors’ efforts. R.W. performed the measurements, analyzed the data, and wrote the main manuscript text. The experiments of the sensor were completed with the help from X.L. T.C. analyzed the data, and R.W. contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Ruirong Wang: Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Xiaohong Li: Software (equal). Tong Chen: Supervision (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
S.
Beniczky
,
P.
Karoly
,
E.
Nurse
et al, “
Machine learning and wearable devices of the future
,”
Epilepsia
62
,
S116
S124
(
2021
).
2.
S. M. A.
Iqbal
,
I.
Mahgoub
,
E.
Du
et al, “
Advances in healthcare wearable devices
,”
npj Flexible Electron.
5
(
1
),
9
(
2021
).
3.
D.
Vrontis
,
M.
Christofi
,
V.
Pereira
et al, “
Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: A systematic review
,”
Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag.
33
(
6
),
1237
1266
(
2022
).
4.
R.
Sarc
,
A.
Curtis
,
L.
Kandlbauer
et al, “
Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management – A review
,”
Waste Manage.
95
,
476
492
(
2019
).
5.
A. H.
Faghih
,
H.
Shahbandarzadeh
, and
K.
Mirzaee
, “
Designing a model for monitoring barriers to the advancement of innovative ideas in the medical equipment industry
,”
Iran. J. Trade Stud.
26
(
103
),
179
208
(
2022
).
6.
E.
Ranjbar
,
R. G.
Sedehi
,
M.
Rashidi
et al, “
Design of an IoT-based system for smart maintenance of medical equipment
,” in
2019 3rd International Conference on Internet of Things And Applications (IoT)
(
IEEE
,
2019
), pp.
1
12
.
7.
P.
Won
,
J. J.
Park
,
T.
Lee
et al, “
Stretchable and transparent kirigami conductor of nanowire percolation network for electronic skin applications
,”
Nano Lett.
19
(
9
),
6087
6096
(
2019
).
8.
P.
Escobedo
,
M.
Ntagios
,
D.
Shakthivel
et al, “
Energy generating electronic skin with intrinsic tactile sensing without touch sensors
,”
IEEE Trans. Robot.
37
(
2
),
683
690
(
2021
).
9.
U.
Pierre Claver
and
G.
Zhao
, “
Recent progress in flexible pressure sensors based electronic skin
,”
Adv. Eng. Mater.
23
(
5
),
2001187
(
2021
).
10.
S.
Mishra
,
S.
Mohanty
, and
A.
Ramadoss
, “
Functionality of flexible pressure sensors in cardiovascular health monitoring: A review
,”
ACS Sens.
7
(
9
),
2495
2520
(
2022
).
11.
J. S.
Kim
,
Y.
So
,
S.
Lee
et al, “
Uniform pressure responses for nanomaterials-based biological on-skin flexible pressure sensor array
,”
Carbon
181
,
169
176
(
2021
).
12.
T.
Li
et al, “
A review of conductive hydrogel used in flexible strain sensor
,”
Materials
13
(
18
),
3947
(
2020
).
13.
Y.
Li
,
Y. A.
Samad
,
T.
Taha
et al, “
Highly flexible strain sensor from tissue paper for wearable electronics
,”
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
4
(
8
),
4288
4295
(
2016
).
14.
J.
Lee
,
M.
Lim
,
J.
Yoon
et al, “
Transparent, flexible strain sensor based on a solution-processed carbon nanotube network
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
31
),
26279
26285
(
2017
).
15.
J.
Ren
,
C.
Wang
,
X.
Zhang
et al, “
Environmentally-friendly conductive cotton fabric as flexible strain sensor based on hot press reduced graphene oxide
,”
Carbon
111
,
622
630
(
2017
).
16.
V.
Tsouti
,
V.
Mitrakos
,
P.
Broutas
, and
S.
Chatzandroulis
, “
Modeling and development of a flexible carbon black-based capacitive strain sensor
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
16
(
9
),
3059
3067
(
2016
).
17.
C.
Cochrane
,
V.
Koncar
,
M.
Lewandowski
, and
C.
Dufour
, “
Design and development of a flexible strain sensor for textile structures based on a conductive polymer composite
,”
Sensors
7
(
4
),
473
492
(
2007
).
18.
E. S.
Hosseini
,
L.
Manjakkal
,
D.
Shakthivel
, and
R.
Dahiya
, “
Glycine–Chitosan-based flexible biodegradable piezoelectric pressure sensor
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
8
),
9008
9016
(
2020
).
19.
S.
Salibindla
,
B.
Ripoche
,
D. T. H.
Lai
et al, “
Characterization of a new flexible pressure sensor for body sensor networks
,” in
2013 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks And Information Processing
(
IEEE
,
2013
), pp.
27
31
.
20.
Y.
Song
,
J. I.
Lee
,
S.
Pyo
et al, “
A highly sensitive flexible strain sensor based on the contact resistance change of carbon nanotube bundles
,”
Nanotechnology
27
(
20
),
205502
(
2016
).
21.
S.
Ma
,
J.
Tang
,
T.
Yan
, and
Z.
Pan
, “
Performance of flexible strain sensors with different transition mechanisms: A review
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
22
(
8
),
7475
7498
(
2022
).
22.
Z.
Wang
,
Y.
Cong
, and
J.
Fu
, “
Stretchable and tough conductive hydrogels for flexible pressure and strain sensors
,”
J. Mater. Chem. B
8
(
16
),
3437
3459
(
2020
).
23.
Q.
Zhang
et al, “
Highly sensitive resistance-type flexible pressure sensor for cuffless blood-pressure monitoring by using neural network techniques
,”
Composites, Part B
226
,
109365
(
2021
).
24.
Z.
Tang
,
S.
Jia
,
C.
Zhou
, and
B.
Li
, “
3D printing of highly sensitive and large-measurement-range flexible pressure sensors with a positive piezoresistive effect
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
25
),
28669
28680
(
2020
).
25.
M.
Amit
,
L.
Chukoskie
,
A. J.
Skalsky
et al, “
Flexible pressure sensors for objective assessment of motor disorders
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
30
(
20
),
1905241
(
2020
).
26.
Q.
Wu
,
Y.
Qiao
,
R.
Guo
et al, “
Triode-mimicking graphene pressure sensor with positive resistance variation for physiology and motion monitoring
,”
ACS Nano
14
(
8
),
10104
10114
(
2020
).
27.
L.
Zhao
,
F.
Qiang
,
S. W.
Dai
et al, “
Construction of sandwich-like porous structure of graphene-coated foam composites for ultrasensitive and flexible pressure sensors
,”
Nanoscale
11
(
21
),
10229
10238
(
2019
).
28.
H.
Souri
,
H.
Banerjee
,
A.
Jusufi
et al, “
Wearable and stretchable strain sensors: Materials, sensing mechanisms, and applications
,”
Adv. Intell. Syst.
2
(
8
),
2000039
(
2020
).
29.
E. W.
Hill
,
A.
Vijayaragahvan
, and
K.
Novoselov
, “
Graphene sensors
,”
IEEE Sens. J.
11
(
12
),
3161
3170
(
2011
).
30.
A.
Nag
,
A.
Mitra
, and
S. C.
Mukhopadhyay
, “
Graphene and its sensor-based applications: A review
,”
Sens. Actuators, A
270
,
177
194
(
2018
).
31.
F.
Yavari
and
N.
Koratkar
, “
Graphene-based chemical sensors
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
3
(
13
),
1746
1753
(
2012
).
32.
M.
Amjadi
,
A.
Pichitpajongkit
,
S.
Lee
et al, “
Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire–elastomer nanocomposite
,”
ACS Nano
8
(
5
),
5154
5163
(
2014
).
33.
Y.
Joo
,
J.
Byun
,
N.
Seong
et al, “
Silver nanowire-embedded PDMS with a multiscale structure for a highly sensitive and robust flexible pressure sensor
,”
Nanoscale
7
(
14
),
6208
6215
(
2015
).
34.
F.
Akhter
,
H. R.
Siddiquei
,
M. E. E.
Alahi
, and
S. C.
Mukhopadhyay
, “
An IoT-enabled portable sensing system with MWCNTs/PDMS sensor for nitrate detection in water
,”
Measurement
178
,
109424
(
2021
).