Wireless transmission technology is a new type of power transmission technology with electric and magnetic fields as the medium. It has more advantages in transmission direction, transmission characteristics, security, and penetration. The model of a magnetically coupled resonant radio energy transmission system is designed. The main parameters such as resonance frequency and mutual inductance are considered comprehensively. The model is designed using the equivalent topological circuit structure of mutual inductance coupling. The equivalent parameters in the circuit topology can be affected by setting the size of the coil, the distance between the coils, the excitation size, and the high frequency. The structure parameters of the whole system are modeled and calculated by the Ansoft Maxwell software. At the same time, the influence on the power and efficiency of wireless power transmission is explored by several factors such as the coil diameter, the distance between the transmitting end and the receiving end, and the resonance frequency of the system, so as to achieve the purpose of verifying the technical characteristics of wireless power transmission. The key factors that may affect the transmission efficiency and power of the system are analyzed in detail by deriving the calculation model of transmission efficiency and power.

Inductive power transmission technology is a novel, flexible, and practical power supply technology.1 It is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction, the electromagnetic field as a medium, and modern control theory as an implementation tool. However, its transmission distance is still short and can only be realized in a relatively small range. Wireless power transmission technology based on the magnetic resonance mode has become a research focus for many scholars in China and abroad. It began in 2007 when MIT scholars proposed the principle of wireless power transmission based on the magnetic resonance mode, which successfully emitted light within a range of 2 m. The 60 W bulb tests have since sparked a research boom in the wireless transmission field.2 

In practical application systems, a well-designed transmission coil has a great impact on the performance of the system. Different coil systems have a different impact on the transmission power and efficiency of the transmission system due to the differences in self-inductance, mutual inductance, and their own internal resistance.3–5 

In this paper, some methods to quantitatively analyze the coil characteristics that have a significant impact on the system are presented. By analyzing the influence of the distance between different coils on the mutual inductance between the coils, the relationship between the coil spacing and the efficiency and power of energy transmission is obtained; by studying the influence of the coil’s own wire diameter, length, and material on the coil’s self-inductance, internal resistance, and energy transmission efficiency and power; and by studying the different resonance frequencies the coil itself is designed for. Based on applying an external circuit, an experiment on the output characteristics of the transmission technology was carried out, and the relationship between the output power efficiency of the wireless transmission and the system resonance frequency was clarified.

The power transmission system in magnetic resonance mode is shown in Fig. 1. Compared with the induced electric energy mode, the magnetic resonance mode has the following two advantages:6,7

  1. The inverter frequency of the energy conversion link at the transmitter has been greatly increased, and its frequency has reached MHz.

  2. Two resonance links are added. The coils used in the resonance link are all in an open state; their own distributed capacitance is used as a resonance capacitance and has a fixed topology, while the transmitting and receiving ends adopt different topologies.

FIG. 1.

Topology structure of magnetic resonance power transmission system (sssp type circuit structure).

FIG. 1.

Topology structure of magnetic resonance power transmission system (sssp type circuit structure).

Close modal

The compensation of the winding inductance of the transmitter and receiver can reduce the reactive power capacity of the system so as to realize the maximum energy transmission of the system. Because the topological structure of the compensation link between the transmitter and receiver is different, it can be divided into four topological structures of PSSS, PSSP, SSSS, and SSSP, as shown in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1, P and S represent the parallel type and series type compensation, respectively. In the magnetic resonance mode, the wireless transmission of electric energy can be realized at a medium distance, which can reach several times the diameter of the coil. At this time, the resonance coil 1 and the secondary receiving coil, the transmitting coil and the resonance coil 2, and the mutual inductance between the transmitting coil and the secondary receiving coil can be ignored. The rough high-frequency inverter circuit is represented by Ui and Ii, respectively, Ui represents the voltage-type equivalent power supply, and Ii represents the current-type equivalent power supply. The inductance is represented by Ls, the resonance coil 2 is represented by Lr, the compensation capacitance of the inductance Lp at the transmitting end is represented by Cp, and the receiving end is represented by Co; the equivalent series resistance of the transmitting end is represented by Rp, and the receiving end is represented by RL. The effective series resistance is represented by Rs, the resonance coil 2 is represented by Rr, Ro is the load, and the reflection impedance from the receiving end to the resonance coil 2, the resonance coil 2 to the resonance coil 1, and the resonance coil 1 to the transmitting end is represented by Zrl, Zsr, and Zps. The mutual inductance between the transmitting end and the resonant coil 1, between the two resonant coils, and between the resonant coil 2 and the receiving end are represented by Mps, Msr, and Mrl, respectively.

The ohmic loss resistance Ro and the radiation loss resistance Rra constitute the main loss resistance of the coil at high frequency. Because the ohmic loss resistance is much larger than the radiation loss resistance in the magnetic resonance mode power transmission system, the radiation loss is generally ignored.

In a circuit with a parallel resonance SSSP topology at the receiving end, due to the existence of the imaginary part of the reflection impedance, the resonant frequency of the resonant coil 2 will be affected by it, and this effect will become very prominent under high-frequency conditions. In order to reduce the influence of the resonant frequency of the resonant coil 2 on the reactance of the load circuit, the method of making the pickup coil into a single-turn coil is often used,8,9 so the internal resistance of the pickup coil can be ignored. It can be seen from the principle of mutual inductance that when the four coils are in resonance and the resonant angular frequency is ω0, the effective value of the transmitter coil current of the two topologies of SSSP and PSSP is represented by Ip. The effective value of the current on the resonant coil 1 is Is, the effective value of the current on the resonant coil 2 is Ir, and the current effective value Io on the load Ro can be expressed as follows:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The reflection impedance Zrl from the receiving coil to the resonance coil 2 is
(4)
From formula (4), the reflected impedance of the receiving end includes capacitive reactance, which resonates with the distributed capacitance of the resonance coil 2 in the case of parallel resonance. In addition, the reflection impedances Zrl, Zsr, and Zps are, respectively,10 
(5)
(6)
(7)
From Eqs. (4)(7), the output power of the system can be obtained as
(8)
The efficiency of the system can be determined according to the ratio of output power to input power, as follows:
(9)
(10)

It can also be clearly seen from Eq. (10) that the main factors that affect the output power and efficiency are the resonance frequency, the mutual inductance and self-inductance of the coil, and the internal resistance of the coil.

The biggest difference between the magnetic coupling wireless power transmission system and the traditional electromagnetic induction wireless power transmission technology is that the former can transmit electric energy efficiently at a medium distance (several times the length of the transmitting and receiving coil). In this section, through the output power and efficiency of the magnetic coupling wireless power transmission system deduced earlier, the principle of the magnetic coupling wireless power transmission system capable of high-efficiency transmission at medium distances is analyzed, and the main factors affecting the efficiency of the system are extracted. This provides a theoretical basis for simulation.

For the SSSP circuit model studied earlier, if the input current, resonant frequency, and load remain unchanged and if the resonant coil spacing is a middle distance, the mutual inductance Msr will gradually decrease as the distance between the coils increases. When the distance between the coils is small, Msr is large, and because ω0 is the MHz level, ω02 is large in the power expression, so the first term in the denominator of Eq. (8) is much larger than the sum of the latter two, so the denominator is omitted. For the last two items, Eq. (8) can be simplified as
(11)

It can be seen from Eq. (11) that when the distance between the resonant coils increases, except for the Msr, which decreases with the increase in distance, the other parameters do not change significantly due to their parameters and relative positions. In summary, with the increase in coil spacing, the output power of the power transmission system can also continue to increase, which enables the magnetic coupling wireless power transmission system to achieve and realize medium-distance and high-efficiency power transmission.11 

The parameter ω02Msr2Ll2 will be smaller when the distance continues to increase. When the coil mutual inductance Msr and the coil internal resistance Rs and Rr have obvious effects on the output power, the expression of the output power is Eq. (8). At this time, the mutual inductance Msr and the internal resistance Rs, Rr are both working, followed by the coil mutual inductance Msr. There is an optimal value to maximize the output power.

The sum of the last two items of formula (8) is much greater than the first one, and the parameter ω02Msr2Ll2 can be ignored. When the distance is too large and the Msr is too small. At this time, the output power is expressed using the following formula:8 
(12)

At this time, the resonance coil exceeds the range of the middle distance, and as the distance increases, the mutual inductance Msr decreases. Under the condition that other parameters are almost unchanged, it can be seen from Eq. (12) that the output power decreases as the distance increases. The system output efficiency in Eq. (9) is similar to the analysis in Eq. (12). Under the medium distance condition, the efficiency first increases and then decreases with the increase of the distance, that is, with the change of Msr, the efficiency has an optimal value.

At the same time, it can be clearly seen from the simplified expression that the excitation frequency is the resonant frequency ω0, and the mutual inductance of the resonant coil Msr and the coil internal resistance Rr, Rs constitute the main factors affecting the output power and efficiency of the wireless power transmission system. Among them, the mutual inductance Msr and resonant frequency ω0 of the resonance coil can be changed through the optimal design of the circuit and the structure design of the coil. The higher the frequency, the greater the mutual inductance, and the longer the optimal and maximum distances for power transmission between coils can be; resistance Rr, Rs need to change the properties of the coil itself, such as changing the wire diameter materials to improve the properties. The smaller the internal resistance, the higher the efficiency. Through the above-mentioned analysis, it can be seen that the increase in mutual inductance between the resonant coils, the increase in resonant frequency, and the decrease in the internal resistance of the resonant coils can all achieve the extension of the power transmission distance.12 

Ansoft Maxwell is software based on Maxwell’s differential equations using finite element discrete form to transform electromagnetic field calculations in engineering into huge matrix solutions. It has the ability to establish two-dimensional and three-dimensional models of static magnetic fields, eddy current fields, transient magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, AC and DC conduction electric fields, and so on. This article mainly uses its 3D modeling and transient magnetic field solution functions. The four-coil resonance model established in this paper based on electromagnetic simulation software Ansoft Maxwell is shown in Fig. 2. The following will use this as a basis to verify the theory described in the previous article.

FIG. 2.

Coaxially placed four coils.

FIG. 2.

Coaxially placed four coils.

Close modal

Both the resonant coil 1 and the resonant coil 2 are copper wires with a rectangular cross section and a circumscribed circle radius of 1.5 cm wound into a disk-shaped coil. The inner diameter of the resonant coil is 20 cm, 40 turns and 50 turns are wound, and the coil spacing between each turn is 0.1 cm.

First, simulate its own inductance parameters. Take a cross section on each coil and apply a current of 10 A to simulate the static magnetic field type. Set the distance D1 between the two resonance coils as a parameter variable, and the self-inductance and mutual inductance parameters obtained by simulation are shown in Table I.

TABLE I.

Coil self-inductance and mutual inductance obtained by simulation.

D1 (mm) Matrix1.L(current1, current1) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current1, current2) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current2, current2) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current2, current3) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current3, current3) (nH) setup1:last adaptive
25.000 000  14.061 900  66.473 520  52.640 144  2.184 432  82.613 125 
30.000 000  14.703 550  63.620 360  53.930 144  0.050 824  84.137 325 
35.000 000  15.276 710  59.247 840  54.532 144  −0.037 499  84.870 900 
40.000 000  15.769 970  53.470 200  54.581 456  −0.028 784  85.620 075 
45.000 000  16.186 600  47.480 000  55.921 264  −0.000 189  87.225 925 
50.000 000  16.567 430  41.840 120  56.137 072  0.226 589  87.418 575 
D1 (mm) Matrix1.L(current1, current1) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current1, current2) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current2, current2) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current2, current3) (nH) setup1:last adaptive Matrix1.L(current3, current3) (nH) setup1:last adaptive
25.000 000  14.061 900  66.473 520  52.640 144  2.184 432  82.613 125 
30.000 000  14.703 550  63.620 360  53.930 144  0.050 824  84.137 325 
35.000 000  15.276 710  59.247 840  54.532 144  −0.037 499  84.870 900 
40.000 000  15.769 970  53.470 200  54.581 456  −0.028 784  85.620 075 
45.000 000  16.186 600  47.480 000  55.921 264  −0.000 189  87.225 925 
50.000 000  16.567 430  41.840 120  56.137 072  0.226 589  87.418 575 

The items in Table I from left to right are the self-inductance of the transmitting coil, the mutual inductance between the transmitting end and the resonance coil 1, the self-inductance of the resonance coil, the mutual inductance between the resonance coil 1 and the resonance coil 2, and the self-inductance of the receiving coil.

It can be seen from Table I that the self-inductance of the receiving end of the transmitting end, the mutual inductance between the transmitting end and the resonance coil 1, the receiving end, and the resonance coil 2 do not change much with the distance, while the mutual inductance between the resonance coil 1 and the resonance coil 2 varies with the distance. This is also consistent with the theoretical analysis results in Sec. III, that is, when the distance between the resonant coils increases, except for Msr, which decreases with the increase in distance, the other parameters have no obvious changes due to their parameters and relative positions. The output power of the system increases as the distance increases, which is an important reason why the magnetic coupling wireless power transmission system can transmit power at medium distances with high efficiency. It can be seen from Table I that its self-inductance is 53 µH. According to the simulation results, the following line chart can be generated for further analysis.

It can be seen from Fig. 3 that the relationship between the coil self-inductance and the distance between the coils is not great, which is consistent with the definition and nature of the self-inductance in the theory. Figure 4 shows that the mutual inductance between the transmitting end coil and the receiving end coil decreases linearly from the middle distance to the long distance, and the mutual inductance is basically zero when the distance between the two coils is 60 mm, indicating that the coil distance has a great influence on the system circuit parameters.

FIG. 3.

Line graph of coil self-inductance with distance.

FIG. 3.

Line graph of coil self-inductance with distance.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Change curve of mutual inductance between resonance coils with distance.

FIG. 4.

Change curve of mutual inductance between resonance coils with distance.

Close modal

Substituting the data obtained in the above-mentioned simulation process into the output power and efficiency expression derived in the previous article, connecting the dots into a line to get the following broken line graph, which can clearly see that the excitation frequency and the resonance coil distance affect the system output power and the effect of efficiency, as shown in Figs. 5 and 6.

FIG. 5.

System output power curve at different transmission distances.

FIG. 5.

System output power curve at different transmission distances.

Close modal
FIG. 6.

System output efficiency curve at different transmission distances.

FIG. 6.

System output efficiency curve at different transmission distances.

Close modal
Set the resonance frequency to 20 MHz, and the capacitance C is expressed as follows:
(13)

From Eq. (13), C1 = C2 = 1.2 pF, and the load resistance is 100 Ω. According to the above data, you can edit the circuit as shown in Fig. 7 in the Maxwell Circuit Editor software as required and connect it to the coil model.

FIG. 7.

Circuit built on simulation software.

FIG. 7.

Circuit built on simulation software.

Close modal

According to the requirements, the same space placement method is introduced into the circuit according to different distances and different excitation (resonant) frequencies under the same distance of the coils. The simulation is carried out in the transient magnetic field with the power frequency as a variable, and the excitation frequency is changed in the external circuit. The model used in this article is three-dimensional, and it takes a certain time to run to get the result. If you need to change the operating efficiency and operating time, you can achieve the effect by changing the parameters such as the fault tolerance rate, the number of iterations, the grid size, and the calculation step length. For example, increasing the fault tolerance rate from the default 1%–10% and the number of iterations from the default 10 to 5 can shorten the simulation time, but at the same time, it also sacrifices the accuracy rate, which will bring a certain error.

In Fig. 2, the four coils are coaxially placed in parallel, the simplified distance is 25 cm, and the resonance frequency is set to 20 MHz. According to the transmission efficiency expression derived earlier, the following curve can be obtained according to the different simulation ideas. When the space is placed in the same way and the distance is different, make the two coaxial and parallel to be placed directly. When the distance is 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 cm, by changing the sine excitation, the frequency that is obtained at different frequencies at the distance, and substituting into Eq. (9), the following graphs of transmission efficiency and excitation frequency at different distances can be obtained, as shown in Fig. 8.

FIG. 8.

Transmission efficiency and its corresponding excitation frequency at different distances.

FIG. 8.

Transmission efficiency and its corresponding excitation frequency at different distances.

Close modal

As can be seen from the above-mentioned figure, when the distance between the transmitting end coil and the receiving end coil is small, which belongs to the short-distance transmission of electric energy, the transmission efficiency is high in the frequency range of 15–25 MHz, and it drops rapidly when the frequency is too high or too low. When the distance between the transmitting end coil and the receiving end coil is large, which is a medium-distance power transmission, the power transmission efficiency will reach a peak at a frequency of about 20 MHz, and the efficiency will decrease as the frequency gradually moves away from the peak frequency. This shows that under the condition of medium-distance power transmission, there is an optimal system resonance frequency, which maximizes the system transmission efficiency.

The following conclusions can be obtained by analyzing the self-inductance and mutual-inductance values of the transmission coil and comparing the above “output power/output efficiency-coil distance” and “excitation frequency-transmission efficiency” curves:

  1. The wireless power transmission power increases first and then decreases with the increase in coil distance. When the coil distance reaches 80 mm, the transmission power reaches its peak value. This shows that in the simulation system in this article, the optimal distance of 70 mm to reach the power is consistent with the theoretical analysis result. The simulation shows that in the design process, it is necessary to select the closest coil parameters and the equivalent parameters of the system to obtain the best transmit power and transmission distance.

  2. The wireless power transmission efficiency increases first and then decreases with the increase in coil distance. When the coil distance reaches 70 mm, the transmission efficiency reaches its peak, and the peak distance is close to the transmission power transmission distance. This shows that in the simulation system in this article, the resonance point is the biggest factor that affects the transmission power and efficiency of the system. For the same system, as long as the appropriate distance is selected to obtain the optimal resonance, both the transmission power and the transmission efficiency will correspondingly reach a good level, which is consistent with the theoretical results. The simulation shows that in the design process, according to the coil parameters and the equivalent parameters of the system, select the transmission distance close to the optimal transmission efficiency.

  3. The magnetic field after coupling resonance is mainly concentrated near the coil and hardly diffuses into the surrounding space.

  4. In this simulation, under the premise that there is a certain distance between the two coils (the distance between the resonant coils is 25 mm), the coupling of the magnetic field and the transmission of energy are still realized, which verifies that the magnetic coupling resonance is suitable for medium and short distance energy transmission. As the simulation time progresses, it can be seen that the coupling degree of the two coils gradually deepens and becomes stable, and the coupling reaches its strongest at the set resonant frequency.

  5. The close distance between the two coils will produce the so-called “frequency splitting phenomenon,” which causes the two coils to fail to reach the maximum transmission efficiency at resonance, but it can make the two coils achieve greater transmission efficiency within a certain frequency bandwidth.

  6. When the two coils are far apart and there is no “frequency splitting phenomenon,” the maximum transmission efficiency is reached at the resonance frequency, and as the distance increases, the maximum transmission efficiency gradually decreases.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Liping He: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Writing – original draft (lead). Pengfei Lu: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal). Hongshun Liu: Resources (equal); Supervision (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
Y.
Wu
, “
Research on new contact power supply system
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China,
2004
.
2.
Y.
Sun
,
Z.
Wang
,
D.
Xin
et al, “
Research on frequency stability of non-contact power transmission system
,”
J. Electrotech. Technol.
2005
(
11
),
56
59
(n.d.).
3.
H.
Hui
,
X.
Huang
,
L.
Tan
et al, “
Research on wireless power transmission transmitting and receiving device based on magnetic field resonance
,”
New Electr. Energy Technol.
30
(
1
),
32
35
(
2011
).
4.
M.
Fan
, “
The influence of the electromagnetic metamaterial at the receiving end on the wireless power transmission system
,”
Electr. Meas. Instrum.
7
,
1
6
(
2019
).
5.
L. L.
Tan
,
X. L.
Huang
,
H.
Qiang
et al, “
Efficiency analysis and optimization on magnetic resonance coupled wireless transfer system
,”
Adv. Mater. Res.
308–310
,
1345
1348
(
2011
).
6.
H.
Zhao
,
Y.
Gao
,
L.
Shen
et al, “
Research on power calculation model and electric energy measurement method under the influence of voltage flicker
,”
Electr. Meas. Instrum.
1
,
121
130
(
2020
).
7.
J.
Dong
, “
Simulation and experimental verification of magnetic coupling resonance wireless energy transmission system
,” M.S. thesis, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China,
2012
.
8.
C.
Zhu
,
K.
Liu
,
C.
Yu
et al, “
Simulation and experimental analysis on wireless energy transfer based on magnetic resonances
,” in
2008 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference
(IEEE,
2008
).
9.
Y.
Xiaowei
,
Y.
Hu
,
X.
Gao
et al, “
Design and implementation of capacitive coupling resonant high voltage wireless transmission system
,”
Electr. Meas. Instrum.
8
,
64
72
(
2019
).
10.
Y.
Zhai
,
Y.
Sun
, and
X.
Dai
, “
Modeling and analysis of wireless power transmission system in magnetic resonance mode
,”
Chin. Soc. Electr. Eng.
32
(
12
),
155
160
(
2012
).
11.
Y.
Zhai
, “
Parameter identification and primary side control of strong magnetic coupling resonance system
,”
J. Electr. Eng. Control
18
(
10
),
10
(
2014
).
12.
J.
Dong
,
S.
Yang
,
T.
Huang
et al, “
Novel constant current compensation network for magnetic coupling resonance wireless power transmission system
,”
Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering
, Vol. 35, p.
17
.