Parylene C film was investigated for extending the service life of fasteners used in electroplating. A 10-μm-thick parylene C coating was applied to a 304 stainless steel surface through chemical vapor deposition, and an accelerated lifetime aging test was conducted by immersing the test pieces in a 60 °C copper sulfate solution. Electrochemical analysis was performed to evaluate the penetration of the film by the solution. Based on the experimental data, it was determined that the solution penetrated the metal surface between days 66 and 73, with a conservative estimate of 66 days as the benchmark for film failure. Following the 10° rule in ASTM F1980, this is equivalent to a film life of 2.04 years at room temperature (25 °C). Hence, a parylene C coating can effectively protect a substrate from corrosion in a copper sulfate solution and could extend the lifetime of fasteners used in electroplating.

Electroplating is an electrochemical process in which a metal film is coated onto a surface to improve its aesthetics or protect its appearance. Many of the tools used in electroplating, such as plating hangers, baskets, or fasteners, are continually immersed in a corrosive acid or alkaline electroplating solution, limiting their service lifetime. Some such tools are coated with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) film or are made of certain materials, such as titanium or stainless steel, to improve their service life.1 

In the printed circuit board industry, copper electroplating is commonly performed.2,3 Using an electroplating solution mainly comprising sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and copper sulfate (CuSO4·5H2O) at concentrations of ∼60–200 and 200–260 g/L, respectively.3–5 

Fasteners specifically made for electroplating are often used to hold workpieces during the electroplating process. Stainless steel is a common material for such fasteners, but it is not immune to corrosion while immersed in an electroplating solution; hence, such fasteners are considered consumable in the electroplating industry. However, coating these fasteners with an anti-corrosion material can reduce the exposure of the metal to the corrosive environment, extending its service life. For a 1-mm-thick 304 stainless steel plate in a copper sulfate electroplating solution with a sulfuric acid concentration of ∼60–200 g/L at a temperature of 25–30 °C.3 The stainless steel workpiece will form holes due to corrosion within 2–5 years.6 

Many scholars have coated metal surfaces with inorganic and organic films and studied their corrosion resistance.7–10 Lu et al.7 produced aluminum coatings on LA43M magnesium alloy by spraying and shot peening and immersed the samples in a 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution for 1000 h. They reported that shot peening was effective for eliminating coating porosity and preventing the corrosive solution from penetrating the coating. Mahato et al.8 coated a Ti–Si–B–C coating on 304 stainless steel. After coated stainless steel was immersed in a 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution for 70 days, electron dispersive x-ray spectroscopy revealed only Ti, S, B, and C element peaks on the coated surface, indicating that no corrosion had occurred. Jeong et al.9 used a liquid crystal polymer to encapsulate neural electrodes and performed accelerated lifetime tests. The electrodes survived in 87 °C saline for 158 days, indicating an equivalent lifetime of 14 years at the human body temperature of 37 °C. Rubehn et al.10 soaked a polyimide (PI)-coated sample in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 60 °C for 20 months and found no change in the PI chemical structure or crystallinity, indicating that the coating has an equivalent lifetime of 8 years at human body temperature (37 °C).

Some studies have also reported that poly-para-xylylene (parylene) can be used as a coating to extend its service life. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of parylene C is 55–95 °C, and vapor deposition can be used to polymerize it on surfaces.11,12 Parylene is acid resistant, alkali resistant, and transparent. By contrast with inorganic films, parylene can be conformally coated onto surfaces of any shape, including those with sharp corners, gaps, or pinholes, and its thickness can be precisely controlled. Therefore, it is widely used to protect circuit boards, sensors, or medical instruments from moisture and corrosion.13 Fasteners have complex shapes; hence, electroplating a uniform coating on these fasteners is challenging. Conventional coating with organic films (other than parylene) usually cannot achieve a uniform coating on the inner side of the fastener or areas with a large curvature by the spray coating method. In addition, PVC has weak adhesion to metal, and sandblasting and primer are required to enhance adhesion.1 The inner side of the fastener or areas with a large curvature may have a risk of coating detachment. Therefore, parylene is superior as a fastener coating. Table I summarizes results from the literature for various accelerated aging tests of parylene-coated test pieces.

TABLE I.

Summary of accelerated lifetime aging results with various parylene package test pieces.a

Accelerated lifetime
Failure modeTest pieces designCoating thickness (max.)SolutionEvaluation equationFailure criteria/observationTemp. (°C)Aging time (max.)Estimated lifetimeReference
10° rule Parylene C + tungsten wires 5 µPBS + H2O2 MTTF = treal × AT AT=2TTref10 1 kHz impedance changed over 50% of the initial value 67 7 days 37 °C/56 days Gong et al.14  
Al2O3-parylene C + pressure sensor Al2O3-parylene C (50 nm/1 µm) Saline Sensor error beyond 2 mm Hg 67 180 days 37 °C/3.3 years Yao et al.15  
Al2O3-parylene C Al2O3-parylene C (52 nm/6 µm)  Leakage current above 1 nA 57, 67, 80 140 days 37 °C/3.1 years Xie et al.16  
 + interdigitated electrodes 
Parylene C + interdigitated electrode 500 nm PBS (a) Leakage current above 1 nA, (b) impedance <0.1 GΩ for any frequency >1 Hz, and (c) impedance phase > −80° for any frequency >1 Hz 60 3 months 37 °C/3 years Minnikanti et al.11  
   (a) Impedance converged to a constant value. (b) Surface coating crack 90 45 days 37 °C/4.8 years Chun et al.17  
Arrhenius Parylene C + neural electrode 20 µPBS AT=eEak1T11T2 Impedance >100 kΩ at 1 kHz 50 56 days 37 °C/115 days Kim et al.12  
5 µPBS Interfacial adhesion < initial value 65 300 h 35 °C/100 days Park et al.18  
Parylene C + thin film resistor 4.7 µSaline MTTF=AeEakT1 Impedance increased by three orders of magnitude of the original value 77, 90 250 days 37 °C/67 years Li et al.19  
Other Parylene C + interdigitated electrode 7.3 µSaline N.A. Surface coating crack 70, 90 45 days No estimate lifetime Lin et al.20  
Parylene N + SS 316L 2 µHanks + H2O2 N.A. (a) Two semicircles in the Nyquist plot and (b) surface coating crack Room temperature 9 days Cieślik et al.21  
Accelerated lifetime
Failure modeTest pieces designCoating thickness (max.)SolutionEvaluation equationFailure criteria/observationTemp. (°C)Aging time (max.)Estimated lifetimeReference
10° rule Parylene C + tungsten wires 5 µPBS + H2O2 MTTF = treal × AT AT=2TTref10 1 kHz impedance changed over 50% of the initial value 67 7 days 37 °C/56 days Gong et al.14  
Al2O3-parylene C + pressure sensor Al2O3-parylene C (50 nm/1 µm) Saline Sensor error beyond 2 mm Hg 67 180 days 37 °C/3.3 years Yao et al.15  
Al2O3-parylene C Al2O3-parylene C (52 nm/6 µm)  Leakage current above 1 nA 57, 67, 80 140 days 37 °C/3.1 years Xie et al.16  
 + interdigitated electrodes 
Parylene C + interdigitated electrode 500 nm PBS (a) Leakage current above 1 nA, (b) impedance <0.1 GΩ for any frequency >1 Hz, and (c) impedance phase > −80° for any frequency >1 Hz 60 3 months 37 °C/3 years Minnikanti et al.11  
   (a) Impedance converged to a constant value. (b) Surface coating crack 90 45 days 37 °C/4.8 years Chun et al.17  
Arrhenius Parylene C + neural electrode 20 µPBS AT=eEak1T11T2 Impedance >100 kΩ at 1 kHz 50 56 days 37 °C/115 days Kim et al.12  
5 µPBS Interfacial adhesion < initial value 65 300 h 35 °C/100 days Park et al.18  
Parylene C + thin film resistor 4.7 µSaline MTTF=AeEakT1 Impedance increased by three orders of magnitude of the original value 77, 90 250 days 37 °C/67 years Li et al.19  
Other Parylene C + interdigitated electrode 7.3 µSaline N.A. Surface coating crack 70, 90 45 days No estimate lifetime Lin et al.20  
Parylene N + SS 316L 2 µHanks + H2O2 N.A. (a) Two semicircles in the Nyquist plot and (b) surface coating crack Room temperature 9 days Cieślik et al.21  
a

MTTF is the mean time to failure, treal is the real aging time to failure under the accelerated conditions, AT is the acceleration factor, T is the testing temperature in degrees Celsius, Tref is the reference temperature in degrees Celsius, T1 is the temperature of the application condition in degrees Kelvin, T2 is the accelerated aging temperature in degrees Kelvin, Ea is the activation energy, k is the Boltzmann constant (8.617 × 10−5 eV K−1), and A is the pre-exponential constant for the chemical reaction.

In this study, parylene C film was coated on 304 stainless steel, and its corrosion resistance while immersed in a copper sulfate solution was evaluated. In addition, ASTM F1980 is an international standard for accelerated lifetime aging tests.22 It is applicable for heat-accelerated aging sterile barrier systems and medical device polymers. The 10° rule (the reaction rates double for every 10 °C increase in temperature) can be used to evaluate polymer lifetimes.9–11,14–17 In addition, various researchers have noted that polymers should not be heated above 60 °C to avoid reaching the glass transition temperature of parylene C.9–11,17,22 This glass transition temperature may change nonlinearly with temperature; therefore, tests above this temperature may be inaccurate for lifetime predictions.11,22 Hence, this experiment is based on the life evaluation method of ASTM F1980, and the coating's failure time at 60 °C was used to evaluate the coating's failure time at room temperature.

A 304 stainless steel (Gloria Material Technology Corp., Taiwan) sample was chosen (Fe base with 0.08 wt. % C, 0.1 wt. % Si, 18.07 wt. % Cr, 1.36 wt. % Mn, 8.01 wt. % Ni, and 2.2 wt. % Mo) as the coated substrate, and its size was 60 × 20 × 1 mm3 (length × width × thickness). The surface was ground with No. 2000 grinding sandpaper and polished using an alumina suspension. Finally, acetone was used to remove all pollutants from the sample surface.

To enhance the interface adhesion between parylene C and the metal, the surface was immersed in a silane-based solution before chemical vapor deposition (CVD) coating.11,16,17,20,21 The silane-based solution was prepared with 50% deionized water, 50% isopropanol, and 0.5% silane A174.21 Before being coated, the test piece was immersed in the solution, soaked for 30 min., and finally blow dried with high-pressure air. Finally, parylene C was coated on the surface of 304 stainless steel through CVD. The 30 g parylene C dimer was heated to its vaporization temperature of 140 °C and then passed through a high-temperature zone at 650 °C to pyrolyze it into monomers. The coating time is 240 minutes. Subsequently, these parylene C monomers were polymerized onto the substrate surface at room temperature. The Alpha-step surface profilometer was used to confirm that the film thickness was 10 µm. Furthermore, the test piece was analyzed through atomic force microscopy (AFM) to inspect its surface quality (a scan area of 1 µm2 on the test piece). For the parylene C film, the root mean square roughness (Rq) was 4.816 nm, and the average roughness (Ra) was 3.805 nm. The AFM images of the pre-CVD, the 10-μm-thick parylene C coating on the surface of the 304 stainless steel, and an SEM photograph of the parylene C coating are shown in Fig. 1. The surface roughness of the test pieces can be reduced from a Ra value of about 3.8-13 nm by the deposition of parylene.

FIG. 1.

The AFM images of a 1 µm2 area. (a) Pre-CVD on the 304 stainless steel, (b) the 10-μm-thick parylene C coating on the 304 stainless steel, and (c) SEM cross-section photograph of the parylene C coating.

FIG. 1.

The AFM images of a 1 µm2 area. (a) Pre-CVD on the 304 stainless steel, (b) the 10-μm-thick parylene C coating on the 304 stainless steel, and (c) SEM cross-section photograph of the parylene C coating.

Close modal

The copper sulfate electroplating solution was prepared.3–5 An electronic balance was used to measure 200 g of copper sulfate powder (CuSO4·5H2O), which was placed into 1000 ml of deionized water and stirred, and 32.6 ml (60 g/L) of sulfuric acid was slowly added. The concentrations of the copper sulfate solution components are listed in Table II.

TABLE II.

Electrolyte concentrations in the copper sulfate solution.

ComponentConcentration
CuSO4·5H2200 (g/L) 
H2SO4 32.6 (ml/L) (60 g/L) 
ComponentConcentration
CuSO4·5H2200 (g/L) 
H2SO4 32.6 (ml/L) (60 g/L) 

The coated test piece was immersed in the copper sulfate solution, and a plate was used to heat the solution to 60 °C to accelerate aging. An electrochemical analyzer (CHI614D, CHI Instrument, Austin, TX) was used to observe the impedance of the test piece in the solution. The detection frequency was 0.1–100 000 Hz, and the AC voltage was 5 mV.23 The experimental configuration is displayed in Fig. 2.

FIG. 2.

Electrochemical impedance analysis configuration.

FIG. 2.

Electrochemical impedance analysis configuration.

Close modal

This electrochemical impedance experiment was performed using a three-electrode system comprising a working electrode connected to the test piece, a mesh platinum counter electrode (area is 6 × 7 mm2), and a silver–silver chloride reference electrode. Finally, a thermometer was placed in the container for temperature monitoring.

Parylene C can maintain its protective properties under continuous exposure to air at 80 °C for 10 years.13 However, its protection varies in different immersion solutions and at different thicknesses. Its protective effect in copper sulfate solution was evaluated through experiments. An accelerated lifetime soaking test (ALST) was performed, and the 10° rule of ASTM F1980 was used to estimate the actual time to failure of the material.9–11,14–17 This rule is applied by using the following equation:
(1)

In the accelerated aging test, groups of 12 samples were soaked in solution at 60 °C; three samples were removed and evaluated at each time point.

An equivalent circuit model was used to evaluate the film characteristics and determine changes in the film impedance by using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Film penetration in the ALST can be divided into three stages: the initial state, penetration by the solution, and film delamination.21,23 Data fitting was used to estimate the changes to the film in the solution. The equivalent circuit model is shown in Fig. 3. In the figure, Rs represents the resistance of the copper sulfate solution, Rfilm is the resistance of the film, and Cfilm is the capacitance of the film. Because the coating is inhomogeneous and the test piece is rough, the piece is an imperfect capacitor and was therefore modeled as a constant phase element (CPE).24 The impedance of the CPE is given in Eq. (2), where Y0 is the CPE parameter in Ω−1 sn (Ω = ohm, s = second).8,25 j is the imaginary unit, ω is the angular frequency, equal to 2πf, and f is the frequency in Hertz. The exponent n describes the behavior of the capacitive impedance. If n = 1, the CPE is an ideal capacitor; if n = 0, it is a pure resistor. Cdl is the electric double-layer capacitance, which represents the capacitive phenomena at the interface between the electrode and the adjacent electrolyte. Rct is charge transfer resistance,
(2)
FIG. 3.

Impedance changes and corresponding equivalent circuit models during the ALST. (a) No solution penetration. (b) Initial penetrated of the solution into the film, the Nyquist plot contains both a semicircular segment and an oblique straight line. (c) The solution has reached the substrate surface, the Nyquist plot has two semicircular segments.

FIG. 3.

Impedance changes and corresponding equivalent circuit models during the ALST. (a) No solution penetration. (b) Initial penetrated of the solution into the film, the Nyquist plot contains both a semicircular segment and an oblique straight line. (c) The solution has reached the substrate surface, the Nyquist plot has two semicircular segments.

Close modal
When the solution penetrates into the film during the accelerated lifetime aging test, the Warburg impedance (Zw) can explain the behavior of diffusion in the electrochemical process, as shown in Eq. (3). Where σ is the coefficient of Warburg and the unit is Ω s−0.5,21  y0 is the constant of σ in Ω−1 s0.5 as shown in Eq. (4),
(3)
(4)

When the test piece is initially immersed, the film blocks the external solution; the equivalent circuit model is as shown in Fig. 3(a).21,23 However, as the immersion time increases, the solution gradually penetrates the surface, and mass transfer begins. At this time, the insulation of the film begins to decrease; hence, the Zw is added in series with the Rfilm, resulting in the equivalent circuit model in Fig. 3(b). In the Nyquist plot, the trailing line segments in the lower frequencies are affected by the Zw. In the initial immersion stage, the solution penetrates from the surface due to the low concentration of the solution at the film's interface; the Zw presents a high-impedance 45° oblique straight line, indicating a strong diffusion phenomenon.26 However, with the increase in penetration time, the film's solution concentration increased. The smaller the concentration difference between the film and the solution, the weaker the diffusion phenomenon, and the Zw presents a 45° oblique straight line with low impedance. When the concentration gradient between the film and the solution is minimal, the Zw impedance will approach zero, indicating that the diffusion phenomenon has almost stopped (the constant of the Zw slope is fixed), meaning that the film's solution concentration is similar to the external solution's concentration and the solution has diffused to the entire film; therefore, the film's protection was invalidated. If the solution continues to penetrate, it will reach the metal surface, forming the appearance of the second electric double-layer capacitance. Eventually, the penetration of the film surface by the solution causes bubbles to accumulate at the interface of the film and the substrate surface, which indicates that the surface film has been delaminated. In this case, the equivalent circuit model is shown in Fig. 3(c).

Figure 4 presents Nyquist plots for the ALST. At 0.5 h of immersion, it can be observed that the high impedance of the arc line on the complex plane; both the maximum real and imaginary impedances are on the megaohm scale. Hence, the film can resist the solution until this point. After 4 h, the semicircular capacitive impedance and an oblique straight line appear together on the complex plane, indicating that the solution proceeded with the mass transfer and penetrated the film. The impedance of the low-frequency oblique line on the Nyquist plot is affected by Zw, and the impedance of the tail end of Zw decreases from the immersion period of 4 h to the 66th day of the immersion period. On the 73rd day of the immersion period, the solution has already penetrated into the surface of the metal, forming the second electric double layer phenomenon, and the complex plane produces the second semicircular line segment. Since the solution exists between the film and the metal interface, it can be used as a basis for determining the failure of the film package, as shown in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d). Based on the experimental data, it was determined that the solution penetrated the metal surface between days 66 and 73, with a conservative estimate of 66 days as the benchmark for film failure.

FIG. 4.

Nyquist plots of the impedance during the ALST. (a) Full plot. (b)–(d) Areas marked by the black square (lower left) in the preceding inset.

FIG. 4.

Nyquist plots of the impedance during the ALST. (a) Full plot. (b)–(d) Areas marked by the black square (lower left) in the preceding inset.

Close modal

Figures 5(a) and 5(b) present the total impedance and phase angle, respectively, of the test pieces at various frequencies. At low frequencies, the total impedance can be expressed as the sum of the film impedance and the solution impedance. If the film impedance is much larger than the solution impedance, the total impedance is nearly equal to the film impedance. As the immersion time increased, the film impedance decreased. According to Fig. 4, as the immersion time increased, both the imaginary and real impedances on the Nyquist plot decreased; hence, the total impedance tended to decrease as the immersion time increased.

FIG. 5.

Bode plot for the ALST. (a) Total impedance and (b) phase angle vs the logarithmic frequency.

FIG. 5.

Bode plot for the ALST. (a) Total impedance and (b) phase angle vs the logarithmic frequency.

Close modal
For the phase angle θ [Fig. 5(b)], the maximum phase angle is located in the frequency range near log 2.5 to log 4. The phase angle equation is shown in Eq. (5); Z″ and Z′ indicate the imaginary and real numbers on the Nyquist plot, respectively. As the solution penetrated into the film, the real impedance decreased, affecting the phase angle. However, the capacitance increased, decreasing the capacitive reactance and also decreasing the imaginary impedance. Hence, as the immersion time increased, both the phase angle and the film's protective ability decreased,
(5)

Figure 5(b) reveals that, at low frequencies (logarithmic frequency from log 1 to log −1), the phase angle increases because of Zw. As the frequency increased, the effect of Zw was smaller, and the phase angle decreased. At intermediate frequencies (from log 1 to log 3), the phase angle began to increase because of the greater capacitive reactance of the film at these frequencies. When the frequency increased and reached the maximum phase angle, the point was the point of the tangency on the tangent of the circular arc on the Nyquist plot. At high frequencies (from log 3 to log 5), the phase angle decreased as the frequency increased because the film's capacitive reactance was small at high frequencies. This was attributed to the increasing frequency, causing the resistance value to approach Rs. Therefore, regardless of the final detection frequency, the phase angle value tends to be constant at high frequencies.

Moreover, as the immersion time increased, the maximum value of the phase angle tended to be at a higher frequency. Because the maximum phase angle is the angle formed by the circular arc and the tangent to the origin, if the circular arc becomes smaller, its tangent point moves to a higher frequency, resulting in this phenomenon.

The EIS fit results for the experimental parameters are shown in Table III. n, which characterizes the imperfect capacitance of the film due to roughness or inhomogeneous surface charge distribution, decreases as the immersion time increases, affecting the CPE capacitance.8 This decrease (n < 1) indicates that the film is a nonideal capacitor; hence, the surface has become uneven because the solution has penetrated into the film, causing deformation.

TABLE III.

EIS fit parameters and standard deviations for the 60 °C ALST.

CPE(film) (Y0)y0Warburg coefficient (σ)CPE(dl) (Y0)
DayHr.RS (Ω)Rfilm (Ω)Ω−1 snnΩ−1 s0.5Ω s−0.5Ω−1 snnRct (Ω)
0.0 0.5 85.6 ± 4.56 (4.21 ± 0.26) × 106 (2.70 ± 0.36) × 10−7 0.901 ± 0.021      
0.1 1.2 86.3 ± 3.09 (2.83 ± 0.17) × 106 (3.61 ± 0.11) × 10−7 0.872 ± 0.007      
0.2 4.1 85.1 ± 1.03 (3.20 ± 0.19) × 105 (3.70 ± 0.27) × 10−7 0.864 ± 0.003 (3.50 ± 0.07) × 10−6 202 146.0 ± 3794.6    
1.2 28.8 85.8 ± 0.75 (2.80 ± 0.18) × 105 (4.06 ± 0.10) × 10−7 0.827 ± 0.006 (5.42 ± 0.18) × 10−6 130 534.8 ± 4304.2    
1.9 44.4 85.7 ± 2.67 (2.66 ± 0.09) × 105 (4.62 ± 0.11) × 10−7 0.814 ± 0.003 (6.95 ± 0.20) × 10−6 101 800.6 ± 3016.7    
4.2 101.5 85.9 ± 0.88 (2.22 ± 0.02) × 105 (4.87 ± 0.08) × 10−7 0.812 ± 0.010 (8.11 ± 0.26) × 10−6 87 168.0 ± 2865.5    
10.2 245.5 85.5 ± 1.76 (1.69 ± 0.04) × 105 (6.20 ± 0.26) × 10−7 0.801 ± 0.004 (1.29 ± 1.13) × 10−5 54 645.0 ± 4824.4    
15.2 365.0 85.1 ± 0.91 (1.37 ± 0.02) × 105 (1.15 ± 0.09) × 10−6 0.757 ± 0.006 (1.82 ± 0.12) × 10−5 38 894.8 ± 255.1    
31.2 749.3 85.3 ± 1.11 (1.07 ± 0.05) × 105 (1.81 ± 0.02) × 10−6 0.743 ± 0.002 (2.89 ± 0.06) × 10−5 24 442.0 ± 536.4    
42.2 1013.0 85.7 ± 1.26 (4.10 ± 0.18) × 104 (1.94 ± 0.04) × 10−6 0.729 ± 0.013 (3.65 ± 0.13) × 10−5 19 351.6 ± 689.2    
51.0 1223.0 85.4 ± 0.58 (2.53 ± 0.09) × 104 (1.95 ± 0.05) × 10−6 0.721 ± 0.010 (8.30 ± 0.19) × 10−5 8520.4 ± 193.4    
59.0 1417.0 85.1 ± 2.83 (8.84 ± 0.36) × 103 (1.99 ± 0.17) × 10−6 0.720 ± 0.007 (9.90 ± 0.37) × 10−5 7142.5 ± 257.8    
66.2 1631.4 85.9 ± 2.58 (8.46 ± 0.35) × 103 (2.05 ± 0.14) × 10−6 0.714 ± 0.018 (1.08 ± 0.07) × 10−4 6547.3 ± 393.8    
73.2 1759.5 86.3 ± 1.91 (2.57 ± 0.11) × 103 (1.26 ± 0.25) × 10−5 0.691 ± 0.011   (2.10 ± 0.27) × 10−4 0.965 ± 0.007 (1.31 ± 0.02) × 103 
CPE(film) (Y0)y0Warburg coefficient (σ)CPE(dl) (Y0)
DayHr.RS (Ω)Rfilm (Ω)Ω−1 snnΩ−1 s0.5Ω s−0.5Ω−1 snnRct (Ω)
0.0 0.5 85.6 ± 4.56 (4.21 ± 0.26) × 106 (2.70 ± 0.36) × 10−7 0.901 ± 0.021      
0.1 1.2 86.3 ± 3.09 (2.83 ± 0.17) × 106 (3.61 ± 0.11) × 10−7 0.872 ± 0.007      
0.2 4.1 85.1 ± 1.03 (3.20 ± 0.19) × 105 (3.70 ± 0.27) × 10−7 0.864 ± 0.003 (3.50 ± 0.07) × 10−6 202 146.0 ± 3794.6    
1.2 28.8 85.8 ± 0.75 (2.80 ± 0.18) × 105 (4.06 ± 0.10) × 10−7 0.827 ± 0.006 (5.42 ± 0.18) × 10−6 130 534.8 ± 4304.2    
1.9 44.4 85.7 ± 2.67 (2.66 ± 0.09) × 105 (4.62 ± 0.11) × 10−7 0.814 ± 0.003 (6.95 ± 0.20) × 10−6 101 800.6 ± 3016.7    
4.2 101.5 85.9 ± 0.88 (2.22 ± 0.02) × 105 (4.87 ± 0.08) × 10−7 0.812 ± 0.010 (8.11 ± 0.26) × 10−6 87 168.0 ± 2865.5    
10.2 245.5 85.5 ± 1.76 (1.69 ± 0.04) × 105 (6.20 ± 0.26) × 10−7 0.801 ± 0.004 (1.29 ± 1.13) × 10−5 54 645.0 ± 4824.4    
15.2 365.0 85.1 ± 0.91 (1.37 ± 0.02) × 105 (1.15 ± 0.09) × 10−6 0.757 ± 0.006 (1.82 ± 0.12) × 10−5 38 894.8 ± 255.1    
31.2 749.3 85.3 ± 1.11 (1.07 ± 0.05) × 105 (1.81 ± 0.02) × 10−6 0.743 ± 0.002 (2.89 ± 0.06) × 10−5 24 442.0 ± 536.4    
42.2 1013.0 85.7 ± 1.26 (4.10 ± 0.18) × 104 (1.94 ± 0.04) × 10−6 0.729 ± 0.013 (3.65 ± 0.13) × 10−5 19 351.6 ± 689.2    
51.0 1223.0 85.4 ± 0.58 (2.53 ± 0.09) × 104 (1.95 ± 0.05) × 10−6 0.721 ± 0.010 (8.30 ± 0.19) × 10−5 8520.4 ± 193.4    
59.0 1417.0 85.1 ± 2.83 (8.84 ± 0.36) × 103 (1.99 ± 0.17) × 10−6 0.720 ± 0.007 (9.90 ± 0.37) × 10−5 7142.5 ± 257.8    
66.2 1631.4 85.9 ± 2.58 (8.46 ± 0.35) × 103 (2.05 ± 0.14) × 10−6 0.714 ± 0.018 (1.08 ± 0.07) × 10−4 6547.3 ± 393.8    
73.2 1759.5 86.3 ± 1.91 (2.57 ± 0.11) × 103 (1.26 ± 0.25) × 10−5 0.691 ± 0.011   (2.10 ± 0.27) × 10−4 0.965 ± 0.007 (1.31 ± 0.02) × 103 

Table III reveals that Y0 was lowest after 0.5 h of immersion. Y0 increased as the immersion time increased because the solution gradually permeated the film, increasing its capacitance. This is consistent with Fernández-Sánchez et al.23 and Toorani et al.25 reported that Y0 increases with immersion time.

In addition, when the test piece was immersed in the solution for 4 h, the y0 was small (the σ is large), resulting in a high-impedance 45° oblique line at the end of Zw. Because of the interfacial concentration at the start of immersion, the interface's concentration is a significant difference, which results in mass transfer by diffusion, and the Warburg impedance is high. However, as the immersion time prolongs, the yo becomes large (the σ becomes small), resulting in a low-impedance 45° angled straight line at the end of Zw. Because the film's solution concentration was increased by diffusion, the concentration difference with the external solution was slight, the mass transfer phenomenon of diffusion decreased, and the Warburg impedance became smaller. Chun et al.17 and Davis et al.27 have reported that diffusion is initially rapid when parylene film is immersed in a solution but slows as the immersion time increases.

The results of the ALST at 60 °C indicate that the failure time of the film was 66 days, with a conservative estimate. At a typical electroplating temperature of 25 °C, the acceleration factor AT can be calculated to be 11.3 by using Eq. (1), and the MTTF is 11.3 × 66 (days) = 745.8 (days) = 2.04 years; hence, it can be estimated that the effective lifetime of the 10-µm film would be 2.04 years. The effective lifetime could be extended by increasing the film thickness; increasing the film thickness by 10 µm should increase its effective lifetime by ∼2 years.

Immediately after immersion, the equivalent circuit model of the sample is as in Fig. 3(a). The parylene C film blocked the external solution. After continuous immersion, the equivalent circuit model of the sample is as in Fig. 3(b). The copper sulfate solution then penetrated the film. The immersion process can be divided into three stages, but the SEM images of film rupture can prove that parylene C occurred during the delamination stage. When the test piece reaches the state corresponding to the equivalent circuit model in Fig. 3(c), the copper sulfate solution penetrates continuously into the surface film, causing bubbles on the surface of the film to gradually grow and causing delamination of the film to occur. This phenomenon is shown in the SEM images in Fig. 6.

FIG. 6.

SEM photograph of parylene film delamination after (a) immersion at 60 °C for 73.2 days; (b) close-up image of (a).

FIG. 6.

SEM photograph of parylene film delamination after (a) immersion at 60 °C for 73.2 days; (b) close-up image of (a).

Close modal

This study investigated the resistance of parylene C to corrosion in a copper sulfate solution, and the goal was to identify a method to extend the service life of electroplating fasteners. Electrochemical impedance analysis was used to evaluate the coating health of an ALST at 60 °C. Based on the experimental data, it was determined that the solution penetrated the metal surface between days 66 and 73, with a conservative estimate of 66 days as the benchmark for film failure. Hence, according to the 10° rule, the effective life of the film would be 2.04 years at a typical electroplating temperature of 25 °C. These results suggest that parylene C can effectively protect a fastener in a copper sulfate electroplating bath. Moreover, increasing the film thickness by 10 µm could increase the fastener lifetime by ∼2 years. Practitioners could use parylene C in an attempt to improve the efficiency of electroplating and reduce associated costs.

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant No. MOST 109-2221-E-992-033-MY3).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Chien-Hao Chung: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Wen-Cheng Kuo: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
J. H.
Lindsay
, “
Some guidelines for the design, care & construction of plating racks
,”
Plating Surf. Finish.
87
(
10
),
16
18
(
2000
).
2.
E.
De Beni
,
W.
Giurlani
,
L.
Fabbri
,
R.
Emanuele
,
S.
Santini
,
C.
Sarti
,
T.
Martellini
,
E.
Piciollo
,
A.
Cincinelli
, and
M.
Innocenti
, “
Graphene-based nanomaterials in the electroplating industry: A suitable choice for heavy metal removal from wastewater
,”
Chemosphere
292
,
133448
(
2022
).
3.
P.
Tao
,
Y.
Chen
,
W.
Cai
, and
Z.
Meng
, “
Effect of copper sulfate and sulfuric acid on blind hole filling of HDI circuit boards by electroplating
,”
Materials
14
(
1
),
85
(
2020
).
4.
K.
Gottliebsen
,
B.
Grinbaum
,
D.
Chen
, and
G. W.
Stevens
, “
Recovery of sulfuric acid from copper tank house electrolyte bleeds
,”
Hydrometallurgy
56
(
3
),
293
307
(
2000
).
5.
A.
Agrawal
and
K. K.
Sahu
, “
An overview of the recovery of acid from spent acidic solutions from steel and electroplating industries
,”
J. Hazard. Mater.
171
(
1-3
),
61
75
(
2009
).
6.
ASSDA
,
General Corrosion Resistance: The Normal State for Stainless
(
Australian Stainless Steel Development Association
,
2014
).
7.
F. F.
Lu
,
K.
Ma
,
C. X.
Li
,
M.
Yasir
,
X. T.
Luo
, and
C. J.
Li
, “
Enhanced corrosion resistance of cold-sprayed and shot-peened aluminum coatings on LA43M magnesium alloy
,”
Surf. Coat. Technol.
394
,
125865
(
2020
).
8.
P.
Mahato
,
S. K.
Mishra
,
M.
Murmu
,
N. C.
Murmu
,
H.
Hirani
, and
P.
Banerjee
, “
A prolonged exposure of Ti-Si-B-C nanocomposite coating in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution: Electrochemical and morphological analysis
,”
Surf. Coat. Technol.
375
,
477
488
(
2019
).
9.
J.
Jeong
,
K. S.
Min
, and
S. J.
Kim
, “
Microfabrication process for long-term reliable neural electrode arrays using liquid crystal polymer (LCP)
,”
Microelectron. Eng.
216
,
111096
(
2019
).
10.
B.
Rubehn
and
T.
Stieglitz
, “
In vitro evaluation of the long-term stability of polyimide as a material for neural implants
,”
Biomaterials
31
(
13
),
3449
3458
(
2010
).
11.
S.
Minnikanti
,
G.
Diao
,
J. J.
Pancrazio
,
X.
Xie
,
L.
Rieth
,
F.
Solzbacher
, and
N.
Peixoto
, “
Lifetime assessment of atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3–Parylene C bilayer coating for neural interfaces using accelerated age testing and electrochemical characterization
,”
Acta Biomater.
10
(
2
),
960
967
(
2014
).
12.
J. H.
Kim
,
D. H.
Baek
,
D. H.
Kim
, and
D. W.
Park
, “
Investigation on Parylene-C based neural electrodes by accelerated life test and reliability improvement using polyimide flexible cable
,”
Curr. Appl. Phys.
39
,
214
220
(
2022
).
13.
M.
Golda-Cepa
,
K.
Engvall
,
M.
Hakkarainen
, and
A.
Kotarba
, “
Recent progress on parylene C polymer for biomedical applications: A review
,”
Prog. Org. Coat.
140
,
105493
(
2020
).
14.
Y.
Gong
,
W.
Liu
,
R.
Wang
,
M. H.
Brauer
,
K.
Zheng
, and
W.
Li
, “
Stability performance analysis of various packaging materials and coating strategies for chronic neural implants under accelerated, reactive aging tests
,”
Micromachines
11
(
9
),
810
(
2020
).
15.
J.
Yao
,
W.
Qiang
,
X.
Guo
,
H.
Fan
,
Y.
Zheng
,
Y.
Xu
, and
X.
Yang
, “
Defect filling method of sensor encapsulation based on micro-nano composite structure with parylene coating
,”
Sensors
21
(
4
),
1107
(
2021
).
16.
X.
Xie
,
L.
Rieth
,
S.
Merugu
,
P.
Tathireddy
, and
F.
Solzbacher
, “
Plasma-assisted atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 and parylene C bi-layer encapsulation for chronic implantable electronics
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
101
(
9
),
093702
(
2012
).
17.
W.
Chun
,
N.
Chou
,
S.
Cho
,
S.
Yang
, and
S.
Kim
, “
Evaluation of sub-micrometer parylene C films as an insulation layer using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
,”
Prog. Org. Coat.
77
(
2
),
537
547
(
2014
).
18.
H.
Park
,
W.
Choi
,
S.
Oh
,
Y. J.
Kim
,
S.
Seok
, and
J.
Kim
, “
A study on biocompatible polymer-based packaging of neural interface for chronic implantation
,”
Micromachines
13
(
4
),
516
(
2022
).
19.
W.
Li
,
D. C.
Rodger
,
E.
Meng
,
J. D.
Weiland
,
M. S.
Humayun
, and
Y. C.
Tai
, “
Wafer-level parylene packaging with integrated RF electronics for wireless retinal prostheses
,”
J. Microelectromech. Syst.
19
(
4
),
735
742
(
2010
).
20.
C. Y.
Lin
,
W. S.
Lou
,
J. C.
Chen
,
K. Y.
Weng
,
M. C.
Shih
,
Y. W.
Hung
,
Z. Y.
Chen
, and
M. C.
Wang
, “
Bio-compatibility and bio-insulation of implantable electrode prosthesis ameliorated by A-174 Silane primed parylene-c deposited embedment
,”
Micromachines
11
(
12
),
1064
(
2020
).
21.
M.
Cieślik
,
K.
Engvall
,
J.
Pan
, and
A.
Kotarba
, “
Silane–parylene coating for improving corrosion resistance of stainless steel 316L implant material
,”
Corros. Sci.
53
(
1
),
296
301
(
2011
).
22.
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Standard Guide for Accelerated Aging of Sterile Barrier Systems for Medical Devices
(
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2021
).
23.
C.
Fernández-Sánchez
,
C. J.
McNeil
, and
K.
Rawson
, “
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies of polymer degradation: Application to biosensor development
,”
TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem.
24
(
1
),
37
48
(
2005
).
24.
S.
Holm
,
T.
Holm
, and
Ø. G.
Martinsen
, “
Simple circuit equivalents for the constant phase element
,”
PLoS One
16
(
3
),
e0248786
(
2021
).
25.
M.
Toorani
,
M.
Aliofkhazraei
,
R.
Naderi
,
M.
Golabadi
, and
A.
Sabour Rouhaghdam
, “
Role of lanthanum nitrate in protective performance of PEO/epoxy double layer on AZ31 Mg alloy: Electrochemical and thermodynamic investigations
,”
J. Ind. Eng. Chem.
53
,
213
227
(
2017
).
26.
R.
Vedalakshmi
,
V.
Saraswathy
,
H. W.
Song
, and
N.
Palaniswamy
, “
Determination of diffusion coefficient of chloride in concrete using Warburg diffusion coefficient
,”
Corros. Sci.
51
(
6
),
1299
1307
(
2009
).
27.
E. M.
Davis
,
N. M.
Benetatos
,
W. F.
Regnault
,
K. I.
Winey
, and
Y. A.
Elabd
, “
The influence of thermal history on structure and water transport in Parylene C coatings
,”
Polymer
52
(
23
),
5378
5386
(
2011
).