Flat and parabolic trough solar collectors concentrate sunlight onto a receiver tube containing the heat transfer liquid. Particularly, CNT nanofluids enhance the efficacy of energy harvesting in these systems. Flat plate collectors are simple in design and cheaper than parabolic shape collectors. Based on this idea, the present investigation focuses on how energy transmission helps harvest solar energy. Thus, three-dimensional, electrically conducting carbon nanotubes suspended in engine oil formed nanofluid flowing past a stretching porous surface with thermal slip are investigated numerically. Through the utilization of similarity transformations, the governing nonlinear partial differential equations are converted into a set of coupled ordinary differential equations. After that, the shooting approach is applied to these equations together with the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method to solve them. The study investigates the influence of various flow parameters on the velocity, temperature, skin friction coefficients, and Nusselt number near the wall. A comparative study of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes is made. From the theoretical calculations, the momentum of flow is higher, and temperature is lower for multi-walled carbon nanotubes than single-walled ones. The heat transfer rate enhances with an increase in Pr and S, and it is opposite when R, St, and δ increases. This study shows that the energy transmission rate is better in multi-walled carbon nanotubes, which act as better cooling liquid.

Dimensionless parameters
Cfx

Coefficient of skin friction in the x-direction

Cfy

Coefficient of skin friction in the y-direction

G

Porous permeability

M

Magnetic parameter

Nux

Local Nusselt number

p′

Velocity in the x-direction

Pr

Prandtl’s number

q′

Velocity in the y-direction

R

Thermal radiation parameter

Re

Local Reynold’s number

S

Stretching parameter

Sf

Velocity slip parameter

St

Thermal slip parameter

η

Dimensionless variable

θ

Temperature

ω

Rotation parameter

Subscripts
f

Base fluid

Abbreviations
SWCNTs

Single-walled carbon nanotubes

Dimensional parameters
A

Thermal diffusivity (m2 s−1)

Cp

Specific heat (J kg−1 K)

K

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

MWCNTs

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes

nf

Nanofluid

N

Kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)

P

Density (kg m−3)

qw

Heat flux (W m−2)

T

Temperature (K)

Tw

Surface temperature (K)

T

Ambient temperature (K)

u,v,w

Velocity components in x,y,z directions (m s−1)

Uw

Stretching velocity in the x-direction (m s−1)

Vw

Stretching velocity in the y-direction (m s−1)

x,y,z

Cartesian coordinates (m)

Ω

Angular velocity (m.s−1)

μ

Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)

τw

Shear stress at the wall (N m−2)

Nanofluids are now widely used in several sectors, including automotive, solar cells, atomic reactor coolants, electronics, engines, propellant combustion, fuel purification, welding, and biomedicine. Their study has attracted attention for their potential applications in several areas, including geophysics, chemistry, biology, mechanical industries, and petroleum. Moreover, due to their superior stability and thermal conductivity, they are widely used in industrial research and development. Choi introduced the phrase “nanofluid” it indicates nano-sized particles dropping within a base liquid. Base fluids are often made of di-hydrogen oxide or complex hydrocarbon compounds (nano-lubricants). Since that time, multiple investigations have been undertaken on them. Numerous research studies1–7 performed investigations on the thermal conductivity characteristics of nanofluids. Rashid et al.8 studied the aligned MHD impact on radiated engine oil-based Casson nanofluid with carbon nanotubes along a shrinking sheet. Mahmood and Khan9 studied the impact of nanoparticle aggregation on the unstable flow of stagnation of nanofluids based on hydrogen oxide.

Examining fluid flow and its thermal distribution properties on rotating and overstretching surfaces is a fascinating subject in fluid mechanics. It involves the applications of torsional vibration analysis, including Flettner ships, bioreactors, and many more. Numerous scholars10–12 have investigated fluid flow and its thermal distribution properties on rotating and overstretched surfaces. Raju et al.13 investigated the dual solutions to the MHD flow of a nanofluid in three dimensions across a stretched sheet that is nonlinearly permeable. Archana et al.14 studied the impacts of a magnetic field and nonlinear heat radiation on three-dimensional flow across a stretched surface of a Maxwell nanofluid. Mohd Sohut et al.15 examined the unsteady three-dimensional flow across a stretched sheet in a spinning hybrid nanofluid. Tarakaramu et al.16 studied the effects of viscous dissipation and joule heating on 3D magnetohydrodynamics transportation of Williamson nanofluid in a porous medium across a stretched surface under melting conditions.

Heat exchange study in a system investigates the formation, conversion, exchange, and usage of energy via diverse mechanisms such as conduction/diffusion, advection, radiation, and convection. The ability of this process is determined by the dimensions and form of nanoparticles. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are small cylindrical pieces made from rolling layers of single carbon atoms, also known as graphene. CNTs are classified into two types: single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), with widths less than 1 nm, and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which have sizes greater than 100 nm, as shown in Fig. 1. These nanotubes have a wide range of applications, including fire alarms, anthropogenic heat generation, Doppler, biosensors, sympathetic cooling, smart meters, thermostats, improving thermal transmittance, and retaining magnetic characteristics. Numerous studies17–20 investigated the nanofluid flow suspended in MWCNTS and SWCNTs. Abideen and Saif21 studied the impacts of internal heat production and heat radiation on a Casson nano-fluid passing via a flexible, curved surface that was suspended in carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Ganie et al.22 examined the impacts of non-linear thermal radiation on the three-dimensional unsteady flow of a nanofluid suspended in carbon nanotubes with varying radii and lengths across a stretching material.

FIG. 1.

Structure of (a) SWCNTs and (b) MWCNTs.23 Reproduced from Norizan et al. RSC Adv. 10(71), 43704–43732, 2020, with the permission of Royal society of Chemistry This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence.

FIG. 1.

Structure of (a) SWCNTs and (b) MWCNTs.23 Reproduced from Norizan et al. RSC Adv. 10(71), 43704–43732, 2020, with the permission of Royal society of Chemistry This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence.

Close modal

The term “thermal radiation” describes the electromagnetic waves that a surface emits as a result of its temperature. Recognizing thermal radiation is crucial for formulating effective heating and cooling systems, maximizing energy efficiency, and managing temperatures in diverse industrial procedures and uses. Many researchers24–28 have studied the effect of heat radiation on the flow of fluids. Sudarmozhi et al.29 investigated the double diffusion of MHD Maxwell fluid in a porous medium using thermal radiation, heat production, and chemical reactions. Yashkun et al.30 investigated the flow and thermal exchange of a nanofluid via a porous material as a result of stretching/shrinking a sheet by suction, a magnetic field, and heat radiation. Aminuddin et al.31 investigated the effect of heat radiation on MHD GO-Fe2O4/EG movement and the exchange of heat across a moving surface. Jalili et al.32 investigated the physical properties of cilia propulsion that electro-osmotically interacts on symmetric and asymmetric conduit flow of coupling stress fluid with heat radiation and heat exchange.

Based on a survey of the literature, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate the impacts of thermal radiation on MHD nanofluid (SWCNTs/engine oil or MWCNTs/engine oil) slip flow past a stretching porous surface, which has not been previously investigated. The analysis is given in dimensionless form, and the shooting approach is applied in conjunction with the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method to solve the resulting problem. The temperature and tangential velocity calculations were graphically presented to understand the influence of various physical factors in the scenario. In addition, a full evaluation of the physical interpretation has been carried out, which includes a presentation and discussion of the skin friction coefficients and the rate at which heat changes the area around the boundary layer. This work will yield new insights that are beneficial for solar thermal applications. The present investigation focuses on

  • how energy transmission helps harvest solar energy and

  • finding out which of SWCNTs or MWCNTs have a better energy transmission rate and which of these two act as a better cooling liquid.

A 3D incompressible steady MHD nanofluid flow serves as the physical model for the current problem across a stretched sheet. The liquid occupies z > 0, and the movement is generated by the sheet being stretched z = 0 along the y-axis and x-axis having velocities Vw = by and Uw = ax, where b and a > 0 are the sheet stretch rates. A stable magnetic field of magnitude B0 is imposed normally to the stretching surface. An extremely low magnetic Reynolds number is chosen to neglect the impact of the induced magnetic field. A constant temperature Tw is maintained for the sheet, where Tw > T and T is the temperature of the ambient fluid. The following are the flow assumptions used in the current analysis:

  • The movement is rotational having a fixed angular velocity Ω and through the z-axis, as illustrated in Fig. 2.

  • While the surface is placed in a porous medium containing MHD nanofluid, the thermal radiation impact is taken into account.

  • CNTs are used as nanoparticles, and engine oil is the base fluid.

  • Approximations of boundary layers.

  • Both velocity and thermal slips are taken into consideration.

FIG. 2.

Physical representation of the problem.

FIG. 2.

Physical representation of the problem.

Close modal
The flow problems contain the following equations:10 
  • Continuity equation:

(1)
x-direction momentum equation:
(2)
y-direction momentum equation:
(3)
Temperature equation:
(4)
Boundary limitations are10 
(5)
Radiative heat flux is considered and can be estimated utilizing the Rosseland approximation evaluated from the idea of diffusion. This can be easily expressed as follows:33 
(6)
where k* is the mean absorption coefficient and σ* is the Stephan–Boltzmann constant. Using Taylor series expansion and ignoring higher-order terms other than the first degree in (T − T), give
(7)
Using Eqs. (6) and (7) in Eq. (4) gives
(8)
Quantities without dimensions are as follows:10 
(9)
Using Eq. (9) in Eqs. (1)(3), (8), and (5) gives
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
Here, prime denotes the derivative with η, and dimensionless parameters are
From an engineering and mathematical perspective, the skin friction coefficients and Nusselt number in dimensional form are as follows:10 
(14)

Here, τwx=μnfuz,τwy=μnfvz,andqw=knf1+RTz.

Using Eq. (9) in Eq. (14), the skin friction coefficients and Nusselt number without dimensions are acquired as 10 
(15)
Here, Re12=aυfx.
A non-linear boundary value problem is constructed using dimensionless Eqs. (10)(13). This set of ordinary differential equations that are non-linear is resolved utilizing a combination of the shooting approach and the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method, and a boundary value solver (BVP4C) incorporated in the MATLAB program. Figure 3 depicts the flow chart describing the numerical processes performed by the MATLAB-based boundary value problem. Before coding, several assumptions must be considered,
(16)
FIG. 3.

Flow chart of the numerical procedure.

FIG. 3.

Flow chart of the numerical procedure.

Close modal
Utilizing the assumptions made in (16), the following set of first-order ordinary differential equations is derived using Eqs. (10)(12) and the boundary conditions (13) as
(17)
(18)
Once the MATLAB code has been converted, the aforementioned system is run to obtain the necessary results displayed in tables and graphs. For each result, a tolerance error of 10−6 is imposed throughout the calculation.

Utilizing the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method in conjunction with the shooting approach, the system of coupled non-linear ordinary differential Eqs. (10)(12) is employed along with a new set of conditions subject to (13). Using Tables I and II, the influence of the impacts of many dimensionless constants on velocities and temperature is shown in Figs. 423 and discussed in detail. In addition, the influence of the impacts of many dimensionless constants on the coefficients of skin friction and Nusselt number is presented in Tables IIIV and discussed in detail. The default values for the many physical constants that are used in this investigation are M = 3, G = 0.4, S = 1, Sf = 0.1, St = 0.5, ω = 0.2, δ = 0.2, Pr  = 7.56, and R = 3.

TABLE I.

Thermophysical correlations of nanofluid used in this study. Reproduced with permission Bhaskar Reddy et al. Int. J. Eng. Math. 2014, 1–10. Copyright© 2014. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PropertiesNanofluid
Dynamic viscosity μnf=μf1ϕ2.5 
Density ρnf=ρf1ϕ+ρsϕ 
Thermal conductivity Knf=Kf2Kf+Ks2ϕKfKs2Kf+Ks+ϕKfKs 
Heat capacity ρCpnf=ρCpf1ϕ+ρCpsϕ 
PropertiesNanofluid
Dynamic viscosity μnf=μf1ϕ2.5 
Density ρnf=ρf1ϕ+ρsϕ 
Thermal conductivity Knf=Kf2Kf+Ks2ϕKfKs2Kf+Ks+ϕKfKs 
Heat capacity ρCpnf=ρCpf1ϕ+ρCpsϕ 
TABLE II.

Thermophysical values of the engine oil, SWCNTs, and MWCNTs used in this study. Reproduced with permission from [Rashid et al., Micromachines 13(9), 1501, (2022)]. Copyright licensed 2022, Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license.8 

Physical parametersEngine oilSWCNTsMWCNTs
ρkg/m3 884 2600 1600 
kW/mK 0.145 6600 3000 
CpJ/kg K 1910 425 796 
Physical parametersEngine oilSWCNTsMWCNTs
ρkg/m3 884 2600 1600 
kW/mK 0.145 6600 3000 
CpJ/kg K 1910 425 796 
FIG. 4.

pη via magnetic parameter (M).

FIG. 4.

pη via magnetic parameter (M).

Close modal
FIG. 5.

θη via magnetic parameter (M).

FIG. 5.

θη via magnetic parameter (M).

Close modal
FIG. 6.

pη via porous permeability (G).

FIG. 6.

pη via porous permeability (G).

Close modal
FIG. 7.

qη via porous permeability (G).

FIG. 7.

qη via porous permeability (G).

Close modal
FIG. 8.

θη via porous permeability (G).

FIG. 8.

θη via porous permeability (G).

Close modal
FIG. 9.

pη via rotation parameter (ω).

FIG. 9.

pη via rotation parameter (ω).

Close modal
FIG. 10.

qη via rotation parameter (ω).

FIG. 10.

qη via rotation parameter (ω).

Close modal
FIG. 11.

θη via rotation parameter (ω).

FIG. 11.

θη via rotation parameter (ω).

Close modal
FIG. 12.

pη via axis ratio parameter (δ).

FIG. 12.

pη via axis ratio parameter (δ).

Close modal
FIG. 13.

qη via axis ratio parameter (δ).

FIG. 13.

qη via axis ratio parameter (δ).

Close modal
FIG. 14.

θη via axis ratio parameter (δ).

FIG. 14.

θη via axis ratio parameter (δ).

Close modal
FIG. 15.

pη via velocity slip parameter (Sf).

FIG. 15.

pη via velocity slip parameter (Sf).

Close modal
FIG. 16.

qη via velocity slip parameter (Sf).

FIG. 16.

qη via velocity slip parameter (Sf).

Close modal
FIG. 17.

θη via velocity slip parameter (Sf).

FIG. 17.

θη via velocity slip parameter (Sf).

Close modal
FIG. 18.

pη via stretching parameter (S).

FIG. 18.

pη via stretching parameter (S).

Close modal
FIG. 19.

qη via stretching parameter (S).

FIG. 19.

qη via stretching parameter (S).

Close modal
FIG. 20.

θη via stretching parameter (S).

FIG. 20.

θη via stretching parameter (S).

Close modal
FIG. 21.

θη via thermal slip parameter (St).

FIG. 21.

θη via thermal slip parameter (St).

Close modal
FIG. 22.

θη via Prandtl’s number (Pr).

FIG. 22.

θη via Prandtl’s number (Pr).

Close modal
FIG. 23.

θη via thermal radiation parameter (R).

FIG. 23.

θη via thermal radiation parameter (R).

Close modal
TABLE III.

Variations in −Re1/2Cfx for SWCNTs and MWCNTs.

MSSfωδRe1/2Cfx (SWCNTs)Re1/2Cfx (MWCNTs)
0.1 0.2 0.2 2.086 354 2.065 476 
    1.891 281 1.866 727 
    1.659 810 1.629 822 
 1.0    2.086 354 2.065 476 
 1.5    2.108 518 2.085 905 
 2.0    2.130 021 2.105 773 
  0.1   2.086 354 2.065 476 
  0.3   1.54 5416 1.536 205 
  0.5   1.234 924 1.229 966 
   0.2  2.086 354 2.065 476 
   0.4  2.069 946 2.050 301 
   0.6  2.060 001 2.040 561 
    0.2 2.086 354 2.065 476 
    0.4 2.073 226 2.053 071 
    0.6 2.057 394 2.038 375 
MSSfωδRe1/2Cfx (SWCNTs)Re1/2Cfx (MWCNTs)
0.1 0.2 0.2 2.086 354 2.065 476 
    1.891 281 1.866 727 
    1.659 810 1.629 822 
 1.0    2.086 354 2.065 476 
 1.5    2.108 518 2.085 905 
 2.0    2.130 021 2.105 773 
  0.1   2.086 354 2.065 476 
  0.3   1.54 5416 1.536 205 
  0.5   1.234 924 1.229 966 
   0.2  2.086 354 2.065 476 
   0.4  2.069 946 2.050 301 
   0.6  2.060 001 2.040 561 
    0.2 2.086 354 2.065 476 
    0.4 2.073 226 2.053 071 
    0.6 2.057 394 2.038 375 
TABLE IV.

Variations in −δ −1Re1/2Cfy for SWCNTs and MWCNTs.

MSSfωδ−δ −1Re1/2Cfy (SWCNTs)−δ −1Re1/2Cfy (MWCNTs)
0.1 0.2 0.2 2.548 105 2.489 723 
    2.432 076 2.365 191 
    2.326 074 2.246 971 
 1.0    2.548 105 2.489 723 
 1.5    3.709 171 3.633 073 
 2.0    4.947340 4.848 190 
  0.1   2.548 105 2.489 723 
  0.3   1.822 007 1.790 582 
  0.5   1.421 903 1.401 830 
   0.2  2.548 105 2.489 723 
   0.4  3.001 079 2.904 698 
   0.6  3.462 816 3.326 851 
    0.2 2.548 105 2.489 723 
    0.4 2.328 774 2.288 136 
    0.6 2.256 563 2.221 657 
MSSfωδ−δ −1Re1/2Cfy (SWCNTs)−δ −1Re1/2Cfy (MWCNTs)
0.1 0.2 0.2 2.548 105 2.489 723 
    2.432 076 2.365 191 
    2.326 074 2.246 971 
 1.0    2.548 105 2.489 723 
 1.5    3.709 171 3.633 073 
 2.0    4.947340 4.848 190 
  0.1   2.548 105 2.489 723 
  0.3   1.822 007 1.790 582 
  0.5   1.421 903 1.401 830 
   0.2  2.548 105 2.489 723 
   0.4  3.001 079 2.904 698 
   0.6  3.462 816 3.326 851 
    0.2 2.548 105 2.489 723 
    0.4 2.328 774 2.288 136 
    0.6 2.256 563 2.221 657 
TABLE V.

Variations in Re−1/2Nux for SWCNTs and MWCNTs.

PrRSStωRe−1/2Nux (SWCNTs)Re−1/2Nux (MWCNTs)
7.56 0.5 0.2 3.194 361 3.243 626 
    2.815 878 2.865 132 
    2.531 406 2.579 638 
    3.194 361 3.243 626 
    2.729 792 2.765 792 
    2.128 480 2.150 909 
  1.0   3.194 361 3.243 626 
  1.5   3.565 354 3.613 157 
  2.0   3.857 601 3.905 353 
   0.5  3.194 361 3.243 626 
   1.0  2.458 205 2.487 260 
   1.5  1.997 781 2.016 923 
    0.2 3.194 361 3.243 626 
    0.4 2.990 942 3.063 586 
    0.6 2.718 617 2.830 147 
PrRSStωRe−1/2Nux (SWCNTs)Re−1/2Nux (MWCNTs)
7.56 0.5 0.2 3.194 361 3.243 626 
    2.815 878 2.865 132 
    2.531 406 2.579 638 
    3.194 361 3.243 626 
    2.729 792 2.765 792 
    2.128 480 2.150 909 
  1.0   3.194 361 3.243 626 
  1.5   3.565 354 3.613 157 
  2.0   3.857 601 3.905 353 
   0.5  3.194 361 3.243 626 
   1.0  2.458 205 2.487 260 
   1.5  1.997 781 2.016 923 
    0.2 3.194 361 3.243 626 
    0.4 2.990 942 3.063 586 
    0.6 2.718 617 2.830 147 

Figure 4 shows pη for various M values. It can be observed that by increasing the M values, the velocity decreases. The fact is that applying a magnetic field that is transverse produces a force of drag equivalent to Lorentz’s that restricts the flow of liquid and thus lower its velocity. In addition, the thickness of the momentum boundary layer diminishes. Figure 5 illustrates θη for various values of M. The temperature is seen to increase in increments of M. Due to its thick thermal boundary layer, strong thermal conductivity, and consistent heat variations in the nanofluid, the velocity profile is more, and the temperature profile is less for M in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Figures 6, 7 and 8 show the impact of G on pη, qη, and θη. It is evident that a porous media makes the flow of the nanofluid more constrictive, and this modulates its motion. In this manner, when G increases, the resistance following fluid motion increases and subsequently reduces both velocities pη and qη. The opposite nature occurs in θη. Velocities are high and temperature is less for G in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Figures 9, 10 and 11 illustrate the impact of ω on pηqη and θη. pη and θη profiles rise in conjunction with an increase in ω, but the qη profile decreased. Both velocity profiles are high, and the temperature profile is less for ω in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil.

Figures 12, 13 and 14 show the effect of δ on pη, qη, and θη. Both velocity profiles increase with an increase in δ whereas the temperature profile has the opposite tendency. Both velocities profiles are more, and temperature profile is less for δ in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Figures 15, 16 and 17 illustrate the influence of Sf on pη, qη, and θη. The velocity distributions pη and qη are greatly reduced, and temperature θη is increased by the velocity slip parameter Sf. The reason behind this is that the velocity of the fluid close to the surface does not continue in the same way as the stretched surface velocity inside the sight of a slip. As a result, the slip velocity increases as the slip velocity parameters are raised. When there is slip, the fluid can only learn about the deformation of the stretched surface, which lowers the fluid velocity. Both velocity profiles are high, and the temperature profile is less for Sf in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil.

Figures 18, 19 and 20 illustrate the influence of S on pη, qη, and θη. It is clear that when the stretching ratio parameter increases, both the temperature θη and the velocity pη are less, while the velocity qη behaves in another way. Increasing the stretching parameter generally results in increased fluid flow pressure and a drop in temperature. Raising the radiation parameter causes the fluid’s temperature in the boundary layer to rise at a distance from the surface and to drop in the closest area of the surface. Both velocity profiles are high, and the temperature profile is less for S in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Figure 21 reveals the impact of St on θη. The temperature slip parameter is increased to lower the temperature profile. The temperature drops as the temperature slip parameter increases because low energy is physically transmitted from the surface to the fluid. The temperature profile is less for St in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Figure 22 shows the influence of Pr on θη. It is seen that the temperature profile θη and the corresponding boundary layer width decrease with increasing Pr values. The drop in thermal diffusivity is correlated with the Prandtl number growth. It is commonly known that fluids at lower temperatures have reduced thermal diffusivity. A thicker thermal boundary layer and lower temperature are indicated by such reduced thermal diffusivity. The temperature profile is less for Pr in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Figure 23 illustrates the effect of R on θη. The temperature distribution at the boundary layer clearly increases as the heat radiation constant values increase. Heat radiation has the effect of accelerating heat transfer because it causes the energy boundary layer to expand. As a result, it has been said that the reduction of heat radiation needs to happen more quickly. The temperature profile is less for R in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil.

Table III displays variations in the surface skin friction along the x-axis for several physical parameters. The friction coefficients in the x-direction are found to decrease as S increases and grows with M, Sf, ω, and δ increase in both SWCNTs and MWCNTs. In addition, variations in the surface skin friction along the x-axis is more in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Table IV displays variations in the surface skin friction along the y-axis for several physical parameters. The friction coefficients in the y-direction are found to decrease as S and ω increase and grows with M, Sf, and δ increase in both SWCNTs and MWCNTs. In addition, variations in the surface skin friction along the x-axis is less in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil. Table V displays variations in the heat transfer rate for several physical parameters. The heat transfer rate is found to decrease as R, St, and ω increase and grows as S and Pr increase in both SWCNTs and MWCNTs. In addition, variations in the heat transfer rate is more in MWCNTs/engine oil than SWCNTs/engine oil.

The current work examines when a stretched porous sheet is in the presence of thermal radiation with slips in front of an MHD 3D nanofluid (SWCNTs/engine oil or MWCNTs/engine oil). Tables and graphs are used to display numerical findings. The following conclusions are obtained:

  • The velocities pη and qη decrease with an increase in M, G, and Sf and are quite opposite when δ increases.

  • The velocity pη grows with an increase in ω and is opposite in qη.

  • The velocity pη drops with an increase in S and is opposite in qη.

  • The temperature θη grows with an increase in M, G, R, Sf, and ω and is opposite when δ and Pr increases.

  • Velocities are more and temperature is less in MWCNTs/engine oil than in SWCNTs/engine oil.

  • The friction factor in both x and y axes is reduced with an increase in M, Sf, and δ and is opposite for S.

  • The friction factor in the x-axis reduces with an increase in ω and is opposite in the y-axis.

  • The heat transfer rate enhances with an increase in Pr and S, and it is opposite when R, St, and δ increase.

  • This work will yield new insights that are beneficial for solar thermal applications. This study shows that the energy transmission rate is better in multi-walled carbon nanotubes, which act as better cooling liquid.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

N. Bhargavi: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). P. Sreenivasulu: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). T. Poornima: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1
N.
Bhaskar Reddy
,
T.
Poornima
, and
P.
Sreenivasulu
, “
Influence of variable thermal conductivity on MHD boundary layer slip flow of ethylene-glycol based Cu nanofluids over a stretching sheet with convective boundary condition
,”
Int. J. Eng. Math.
2014
,
905158
(n.d.).
2
D.
Srinivasacharya
,
U.
Mendu
, and
K.
Venumadhav
, “
MHD boundary layer flow of a nanofluid past a wedge
,”
Procedia Eng.
127
,
1064
1070
(
2015
).
3
P.
Durga Prasad
,
R. V. M. S. S.
Kiran Kumar
, and
S. V. K.
Varma
, “
Heat and mass transfer analysis for the MHD flow of nanofluid with radiation absorption
,”
Ain Shams Eng. J.
9
(
4
),
801
813
(
2018
).
4
M.
Jyotshna
and
V.
Dhanalaxmi
, “
Impact of activation energy and heat source/sink on 3D flow of Williamson nanofluid with GaN nanoparticles over A stretching sheet
,”
Eur. J. Math. Stat.
3
(
5
),
16
29
(
2022
).
5
G.
Dharmaiah
,
F.
Mebarek-Oudina
,
M.
Sreenivasa Kumar
, and
K.
Chandra Kala
, “
Nuclear reactor application on Jeffrey fluid flow with Falkner–Skan factor, Brownian and thermophoresis, non linear thermal radiation impacts past a wedge
,”
J. Indian Chem. Soc.
100
(
2
),
100907
(
2023
).
6
B.
Souayeh
, “
Simultaneous features of CC heat flux on dusty ternary nanofluid (graphene+tungsten oxide+zirconium oxide) through a magnetic field with slippery condition
,”
Mathematics
11
(
3
),
554
(
2023
).
7
B.
Souayeh
and
K.
Ramesh
, “
Numerical scrutinization of ternary nanofluid flow over an exponentially stretching sheet with gyrotactic microorganisms
,”
Mathematics
11
(
4
),
981
(
2023
).
8
I.
Rashid
,
T.
Zubair
,
M. I.
Asjad
, and
E. M.
Tag-Eldin
, “
The influence of aligned MHD on engine oil-based casson nanofluid with carbon nanotubes (single and multi-wall) passing through a shrinking sheet with thermal radiation and wall mass exchange
,”
Micromachines
13
(
9
),
1501
(
2022
).
9
Z.
Mahmood
and
U.
Khan
, “
Nanoparticles aggregation effects on unsteady stagnation point flow of hydrogen oxide-based nanofluids
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
137
(
6
),
750
(
2022
).
10
T. S.
Kumar
, “
Hybrid nanofluid slip flow and heat transfer over a stretching surface
,”
Partial Differ. Equations Appl. Math.
4
,
100070
(
2021
).
11
A.
Hussain
et al, “
Three-dimensional water-based magneto-hydrodynamic rotating nanofluid flow over a linear extending sheet and heat transport analysis: A numerical approach
,”
Energies
14
(
16
),
5133
(
2021
).
12
M.
Faisal
,
K. K.
Asogwa
,
N.
Alessa
, and
K.
Loganathan
, “
Nonlinear radiative nanofluidic hydrothermal unsteady bidirectional transport with thermal/mass convection aspects
,”
Symmetry
14
(
12
),
2609
(
2022
).
13
C. S. K.
Raju
,
N.
Sandeep
,
M.
Jayachandra Babu
, and
V.
Sugunamma
, “
Dual solutions for three-dimensional MHD flow of a nanofluid over a nonlinearly permeable stretching sheet
,”
Alexandria Eng. J.
55
(
1
),
151
162
(
2016
).
14
M.
Archana
,
B. J.
Gireesha
,
P.
Venkatesh
, and
M. G.
Reddy
, “
Influence of nonlinear thermal radiation and magnetic field on three-dimensional flow of a Maxwell nanofluid
,”
J. Nanofluids
6
(
2
),
232
242
(
2017
).
15
N. F. H.
Mohd Sohut
,
S. K.
Soid
,
S.
Abu Bakar
, and
A.
Ishak
, “
Unsteady three-dimensional flow in a rotating hybrid nanofluid over a stretching sheet
,”
Mathematics
10
(
3
),
348
(
2022
).
16
N.
Tarakaramu
,
N.
Sivakumar
,
P. V.
Satya Narayana
, and
R.
Sivajothi
, “
Viscous dissipation and joule heating effects on 3D magnetohydrodynamics flow of Williamson nanofluid in a porous medium over a stretching surface with melting condition
,”
ASME Open J. Eng.
1
,
011033
(
2022
).
17
A.
Khalid
,
I.
Khan
,
A.
Khan
,
S.
Shafie
, and
I.
Tlili
, “
Case study of MHD blood flow in a porous medium with CNTS and thermal analysis
,”
Case Stud. Thermal Eng.
12
,
374
380
(
2018
).
18
P.
Sreenivasulu
,
T.
Poornima
,
N. B.
Reddy
, and
M. G.
Reddy
, “
A numerical analysis on UCM dissipated Nanofluid imbedded carbon Nanotubes influenced by inclined Lorentzian force along with non-uniform heat source/sink
,”
J. Nanofluids
8
(
5
),
1076
1084
(
2018
).
19
R.
Krishanan
,
S.
Maity
,
S. K.
Singh
, and
B. S.
Dandapat
, “
Modelling of thin CNTs nanoliquid film flow over a Bi-directional stretching surface
,”
Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math.
6
(
5
),
147
(
2020
).
20
H. T.
Alkasasbeh
,
M. Z.
Swalmeh
,
H. G.
Bani Saeed
,
F. M.
Al Faqih
, and
A. G.
Talafha
, “
Investigation on CNTs-water and human blood based casson nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet under impact of magnetic field
,”
Front. Heat Mass Transfer
14
,
1
7
(
2020
).
21
Z. U.
Abideen
and
R. S.
Saif
, “
Impact of thermal radiation and internal heat generation on Casson nano-fluid flowing by a curved stretchable surface with suspension of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
,”
Heliyon
9
(
8
),
e18941
(
2023
).
22
A. H.
Ganie
,
Z.
Mahmood
,
U.
Khan
, and
M. Y.
Almusawa
, “
Impact of nonlinear thermal radiation on three-dimensional unsteady flow of carbon nanotube-suspended nanofluid with different length and radius over a stretching surface
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. C
35
(
2
),
2440001
(
2024
).
23
M. N.
Norizan
et al, “
Carbon nanotubes: Functionalisation and their application in chemical sensors
,”
RSC Adv.
10
(
71
),
43704
43732
(
2020
).
24
M.
Darzi
,
M.
Vatani
,
S. E.
Ghasemi
, and
D. D.
Ganji
, “
Effect of thermal radiation on velocity and temperature fields of a thin liquid film over a stretching sheet in a porous medium
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
130
(
5
),
100
(
2015
).
25
F.
Alzahrani
and
M. I.
Khan
, “
Significance of induced magnetic force bio-convective flow of radiative Maxwell nanofluid with activation energy
,”
Case Stud. Thermal Eng.
27
,
101282
(
2021
).
26
Y.
Suresh Kumar
et al, “
Numerical analysis of magnetohydrodynamics Casson nanofluid flow with activation energy, Hall current and thermal radiation
,”
Sci. Rep.
13
(
1
),
4021
(
2023
).
27
N.
Bhargavi
,
T.
Poornima
, and
B.
Souayeh
, “
Magnetohydrodynamic conjugate heat transfer analysis on a viscous fluid past a vertical permeable plate
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
38
,
2450211
(
2023
).
28
W.
Shinwari
,
T.
Hayat
,
Z.
Abbas
, and
S.
Momani
, “
Numerical study for trihybrid nanomaterial flow by convectively heated curved sheet
,”
Case Stud. Thermal Eng.
53
,
103962
(
2024
).
29
K.
Sudarmozhi
,
D.
Iranian
,
I.
Khan
,
J.
Alzahrani
,
A. S.
Al-Johani
, and
S. M.
Eldin
, “
Double diffusion in a porous medium of MHD Maxwell fluid with thermal radiation, heat generation and chemical reaction
,”
Case Stud. Thermal Eng.
43
,
102700
(
2023
).
30
U.
Yashkun
,
K.
Zaimi
,
S. F.
Sufahani
,
M. R.
Eid
, and
M.
Ferdows
, “
Flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid through a porous medium due to stretching/shrinking sheet with suction, magnetic field and thermal radiation
,”
Appl. Math.-A J. Chin. Univ.
38
(
3
),
373
391
(
2023
).
31
N. A.
Aminuddin
,
N. A. A. M.
Nasir
,
W.
Jamshed
,
A.
Ishak
,
I.
Pop
, and
M. R.
Eid
, “
Impact of thermal radiation on MHD GO-Fe2O4/EG flow and heat transfer over a moving surface
,”
Symmetry
15
(
3
),
584
(
2023
).
32
P.
Jalili
,
A.
Ahmadi Azar
,
B.
Jalili
, and
D.
Domiri Ganji
, “
A novel technique for solving unsteady three-dimensional Brownian motion of a thin film nanofluid flow over a rotating surface
,”
Sci. Rep.
13
(
1
),
13241
(
2023
).
33
T.
Poornima
,
P.
Sreenivasulu
, and
N. B.
Reddy
, “
Slip flow of Casson rheological fluid under variable thermal conductivity with radiation effects
,”
Heat Transfer-Asian Res.
44
(
8
),
718
737
(
2015
).