The luminescent spectra of boron–nitrogen (BN) superatoms under the influence of small molecule excitation remain unexplored, yet hold promising prospects for application in luminescent materials. This study employs density functional theory to investigate the absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of small molecules (pyrazine, pyridine, and benzene) adsorbed on B12N12 superatoms. The findings reveal the formation of stable chemisorption structures, namely pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12, while benzene forms a physisorption structure benzene-B12N12. Interestingly, the adsorbed benzene enhances the absorption spectrum intensity of B12N12, while pyrazine and pyridine adsorbed significantly amplify the emission spectrum intensity of B12N12. Moreover, this study discusses the impact of variation in the number of adsorbed small molecules on spectral characteristics. Results indicate that the absorption spectra intensity of 2pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, and 2benzene-B12N12 is relatively robust, with 2benzene-B12N12 exhibiting a stronger emission spectrum intensity compared to benzene-B12N12 and 4benzene-B12N12. These computational findings offer valuable insights for the exploration of luminescent materials and serve as theoretical reference for experimental investigations.

Previous research has identified several superatoms with distinct spectral properties, including Au20,1 Na40,2 Al13,3 and C60.4 The spectral characteristics of B40 fullerene are investigated, and these characteristics distinguish its hollow cage structure from other quasi-planar configurations.5 Subsequent theoretical studies confirmed it as a superatom.6 Recently, investigations into the luminescence properties of small molecule-excited B40 have demonstrated that the adsorbed pyrazine intensifies both the absorption and emission spectra of B40 and lead to a redshift into the visible light range.7 The non-metallic nature of boron–nitrogen (BN) cages, such as B12N12, B16N16, and B28N28, which are also superatoms,8,9 prompts inquiry into whether the adsorbed small molecules can similarly augment or alter the spectral properties of BN superatoms.

In recent years, significant attention has been devoted to the exploration of several BN-based molecules and materials for hydrogen storage.10–13 Studies have delved into the adsorption properties of BN fullerene, revealing its potential utility as drug delivery carriers14–17 and collector of gases.18,19 Moreover, investigations into the CO oxidation capabilities of BN fullerene have highlighted its promise for CO and CO2 capture, attributed to the presence of B–B bonds.20 In addition, theoretical analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of B12N12 in adsorbing and decomposing methanol molecules at room temperature.21 Furthermore, doping B12N12 with aluminum has been shown to enhance the adsorption energy and thermodynamic stability of aspirin molecules.22 Thus, the adsorption of small molecules onto B12N12 fullerene presents an intriguing avenue for potentially enhancing its spectral properties.

This study employs density functional theory (DFT)23 to explore the adsorption of small molecules (pyrazine, pyridine, and benzene) on BN fullerenes. Results indicate that the adsorbed benzene enhances the absorption spectrum of B12N12, whereas the adsorption of pyrazine and pyridine enhances its emission spectrum. Furthermore, the number of adsorbed small molecules influences the spectrum. The primary objective of this research is to elucidate the influence of small molecules on the spectra of B12N12 superatoms.

The model is constructed by adsorbing small molecules (pyrazine, pyridine, and benzene) onto the B12N12 superatom. Given that B12N12 fullerene comprises eight hexagonal and six tetragonal BN rings,24 the pyrazine, pyridine, and benzene adsorb at the hexagon, tetragon, and B atom sites of the B12N12 fullerene to form the studied structures. Following theoretical simulation and structural optimization, three stable geometric configurations are obtained, as depicted in Fig. 1. In Figs. 1(a) and 1(b), the N atoms of pyrazine and pyridine are bonded with the B atom of B12N12, forming chemisorption structures denoted as pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12, respectively. Figure 1(c) illustrates benzene adsorption at a tetragonal BN ring of B12N12, identified as the physisorption structure benzene-B12N12. The relative energies are listed in Table S1 of the supplementary material.

FIG. 1.

Structural diagrams of pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level: (a) pyrazine-B12N12 and (b) pyridine-B12N12, showing the N atoms of pyrazine and pyridine bonded to the B atoms of B12N12; (c) benzene-B12N12, illustrating benzene adsorbed on the tetragonal BN ring of B12N12. In these structures, pink, cyan, and blue denote B, C, and N atoms, respectively.

FIG. 1.

Structural diagrams of pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level: (a) pyrazine-B12N12 and (b) pyridine-B12N12, showing the N atoms of pyrazine and pyridine bonded to the B atoms of B12N12; (c) benzene-B12N12, illustrating benzene adsorbed on the tetragonal BN ring of B12N12. In these structures, pink, cyan, and blue denote B, C, and N atoms, respectively.

Close modal

The empirical dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D3)25 is employed to fully optimize the geometric structures using hybrid functionals B3LYP26,27 with 6-31G* basis sets.28–30 All optimized structures are verified to be local minima. Subsequently, the time-dependent-DFT (TD-DFT) method31,32 is utilized to compute electronic transitions and absorption and emission spectral properties based on the optimized structures and first excited states. For this purpose, range-separated hybrid functionals CAM-B3LYP33,34 are chosen to calculate absorption and emission spectra with 6-31+G* basis sets,35 as previous studies have shown that the CAM-B3LYP functional can improve spectroscopic properties for materials.36–38 In addition, 30 and 10 electronic states are selected for calculation in the absorption and emission spectra. All calculations are conducted using the Gaussian 16 package.39 

The ground states of the three investigated structures are singlet states, and their corresponding molecular orbitals (MOs) diagrams are depicted in Fig. 2. In the case of pyrazine-B12N12, the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and LUMO+1 are predominantly localized on pyrazine, whereas the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), HOMO−1, HOMO−2, HOMO−3, HOMO−4, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, HOMO−8, HOMO−12, LUMO+10, LUMO+8, LUMO+7, LUMO+6, LUMO+5, LUMO+4, LUMO+3, and LUMO+2 mainly occupy the B12N12 superatom. In addition, HOMO−10 exhibits delocalization across the entire structure [refer to Fig. 2(a)]. Similarly, for pyridine-B12N12, LUMO+1, LUMO, and HOMO−10 are predominantly localized on pyridine, while LUMO+8, LUMO+7, LUMO+6, LUMO+5, LUMO+4, LUMO+3, LUMO+2, HOMO, HOMO−1, HOMO−2, HOMO−3, HOMO−4, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, HOMO−8, and HOMO−9 mainly occupy the B12N12 superatom. HOMO−11 is distributed over both pyridine and B12N12 [see Fig. 2(b)]. In contrast to pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12, the HOMO and HOMO−1 of benzene-B12N12 are localized on benzene, while LUMO+14, LUMO+13, LUMO+12, LUMO+11, LUMO+9, LUMO+8, LUMO+4, LUMO+3, LUMO+2, LUMO+1, LUMO, HOMO−2, HOMO−3, HOMO−4, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, and HOMO−7 primarily occupy the B12N12 superatom. Furthermore, LUMO+6 is situated on both benzene and B12N12 [as depicted in Fig. 2(c)]. Consequently, in the pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12 structures, electron transitions occur from B12N12 to small molecules, while in benzene-B12N12, electron transitions occur from benzene to the B12N12 cage.

FIG. 2.

Frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) for (a) pyrazine-B12N12, (b) pyridine-B12N12, and (c) benzene-B12N12, computed at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. Occupied MOs are denoted by green and red, while unoccupied MOs are represented by orange and blue. The isosurface value is set at 0.02 a.u.

FIG. 2.

Frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) for (a) pyrazine-B12N12, (b) pyridine-B12N12, and (c) benzene-B12N12, computed at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. Occupied MOs are denoted by green and red, while unoccupied MOs are represented by orange and blue. The isosurface value is set at 0.02 a.u.

Close modal

To explore the impact of small molecule excitation on B12N12 superatoms, we analyzed the UV–Vis absorption spectra, as depicted in Fig. 3. The absorption spectrum of B12N12 (black curve) in Fig. 3 exhibits typical absorption peaks near 167 and 180 nm, which have also been observed in previous studies.40 These peaks primarily arise from transitions from HOMO, HOMO−1, HOMO−2, HOMO−3, HOMO−4, and HOMO−5 to LUMO, LUMO+1, LUMO+2, LUMO+4, and LUMO+5. In addition, Table I presents the data for five typical absorption peaks of pyrazine-B12N12. The first prominent absorption peak of this structure (blue curve) is situated at around 234 nm, primarily stemming from the transition from HOMO−10 to LUMO. The second absorption peak, near 183 nm, originates from transitions involving HOMO−4 to LUMO+6, and HOMO to LUMO+2 and LUMO+10. The remaining three typical absorption peaks, located approximately at 186, 216, and 217 nm, result from transitions including HOMO−12 to LUMO, HOMO−10 to LUMO+1, HOMO−5 to LUMO, HOMO−4 to LUMO, HOMO−1 to LUMO+1, and HOMO to LUMO+2. In addition, referring to the frontier MOs diagram [Fig. 2(a)], it becomes evident that the primary absorption peaks of pyrazine-B12N12 stem from transitions involving B12N12 to B12N12 and pyrazine.

FIG. 3.

Absorption spectra of B12N12, pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, calculated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G* level.

FIG. 3.

Absorption spectra of B12N12, pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, calculated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G* level.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Absorption properties of pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, including excitation energy (E, in eV), absorption wavelength (λ, in nm), and oscillator strength (f).

StructuresE/λfMain configuration (transitions)Assignment
Pyrazine-B12N12 6.78/182.91 0.0496 HOMO−4 → LUMO+6 (29%) B12N12 → B12N12 
HOMO → LUMO+2 (21%) 
HOMO → LUMO+10 (22%) 
6.67/185.89 0.0236 HOMO−12 → LUMO (23%) B12N12 → B12N12 and pyrazine 
HOMO−10 → LUMO+1 (37%) 
HOMO → LUMO+2 (26%) 
5.75/215.60 0.0209 HOMO−4 → LUMO (24%) B12N12 → pyrazine 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (58%) 
5.72/216.66 0.0275 HOMO−5 → LUMO (35%) B12N12 → pyrazine 
HOMO−5 → LUMO (35%) 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (26%) 
5.29/234.18 0.0909 HOMO−10 → LUMO (65%) B12N12 and pyrazine → pyrazine 
Pyridine-B12N12 6.79/182.51 0.0383 HOMO−10 → LUMO (46%) B12N12 and pyridine → pyridine 
HOMO−3 → LUMO (23%) 
6.76/183.40 0.0321 HOMO−3 → LUMO+1 (33%) B12N12 → pyridine 
6.14/201.83 0.0740 HOMO−11 → LUMO (25%) B12N12 and pyridine → pyridine 
HOMO−8 → LUMO (20%) 
HOMO−6 → LUMO (24%) 
HOMO−5 → LUMO (36%) 
HOMO−4 → LUMO (33%) 
5.50/225.46 0.0463 HOMO−9 → LUMO (57%) B12N12 → pyridine 
Benzene-B12N12 7.22/171.77 0.2123 HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (40%) Benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+13 (21%) 
7.20/172.21 0.3749 HOMO−1 → LUMO (21%) Benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (25%) 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+13 (29%) 
HOMO → LUMO+11 (21%) 
HOMO → LUMO+12 (21%) 
7.11/174.46 0.4673 HOMO−1 → LUMO+11 (30%) Benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+12 (31%) 
HOMO → LUMO+9 (22%) 
HOMO → LUMO+13 (30%) 
6.0/182.37 0.3371 HOMO−1 → LUMO (53%) benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+9 (22%) 
HOMO → LUMO+11 (21%) 
HOMO → LUMO+12 (22%) 
StructuresE/λfMain configuration (transitions)Assignment
Pyrazine-B12N12 6.78/182.91 0.0496 HOMO−4 → LUMO+6 (29%) B12N12 → B12N12 
HOMO → LUMO+2 (21%) 
HOMO → LUMO+10 (22%) 
6.67/185.89 0.0236 HOMO−12 → LUMO (23%) B12N12 → B12N12 and pyrazine 
HOMO−10 → LUMO+1 (37%) 
HOMO → LUMO+2 (26%) 
5.75/215.60 0.0209 HOMO−4 → LUMO (24%) B12N12 → pyrazine 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (58%) 
5.72/216.66 0.0275 HOMO−5 → LUMO (35%) B12N12 → pyrazine 
HOMO−5 → LUMO (35%) 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (26%) 
5.29/234.18 0.0909 HOMO−10 → LUMO (65%) B12N12 and pyrazine → pyrazine 
Pyridine-B12N12 6.79/182.51 0.0383 HOMO−10 → LUMO (46%) B12N12 and pyridine → pyridine 
HOMO−3 → LUMO (23%) 
6.76/183.40 0.0321 HOMO−3 → LUMO+1 (33%) B12N12 → pyridine 
6.14/201.83 0.0740 HOMO−11 → LUMO (25%) B12N12 and pyridine → pyridine 
HOMO−8 → LUMO (20%) 
HOMO−6 → LUMO (24%) 
HOMO−5 → LUMO (36%) 
HOMO−4 → LUMO (33%) 
5.50/225.46 0.0463 HOMO−9 → LUMO (57%) B12N12 → pyridine 
Benzene-B12N12 7.22/171.77 0.2123 HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (40%) Benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+13 (21%) 
7.20/172.21 0.3749 HOMO−1 → LUMO (21%) Benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+1 (25%) 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+13 (29%) 
HOMO → LUMO+11 (21%) 
HOMO → LUMO+12 (21%) 
7.11/174.46 0.4673 HOMO−1 → LUMO+11 (30%) Benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+12 (31%) 
HOMO → LUMO+9 (22%) 
HOMO → LUMO+13 (30%) 
6.0/182.37 0.3371 HOMO−1 → LUMO (53%) benzene → B12N12 
HOMO−1 → LUMO+9 (22%) 
HOMO → LUMO+11 (21%) 
HOMO → LUMO+12 (22%) 

Moreover, the data pertaining to the four typical absorption peaks of pyridine-B12N12 are provided in Table I. The first strong absorption peak is positioned at around 202 nm, primarily originating from transitions including HOMO−4, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, HOMO−8, and HOMO−11 to LUMO. The subsequent absorption peak is observed near 225 nm, originating from the transition from HOMO−9 to LUMO. The remaining two typical absorption peaks, located approximately at 182.51 and 183.4 nm, are relatively weak and stem from transitions such as HOMO−3 and HOMO−10 to LUMO and LUMO+1. Consequently, the primary absorption peaks of pyridine-B12N12 predominantly arise from transitions involving B12N12 and pyridine to pyridine.

In addition, we analyzed the absorption spectrum of the benzene-B12N12 structure, represented by the green curve in Fig. 3. The data regarding four typical absorption peaks are provided in Table I. The first prominent absorption peak is situated near 174 nm, stemming from transitions including HOMO and HOMO−1 to LUMO+9, LUMO+11, LUMO+12, and LUMO+13. The second strong absorption peak, positioned at around 172 nm, originates from transitions from HOMO and HOMO−1 to LUMO, LUMO+1, LUMO+11, LUMO+12, and LUMO+13. Furthermore, the remaining two typical absorption peaks, located near 172 and 182 nm, result from transitions such as HOMO and HOMO−1 to LUMO, LUMO+1, LUMO+9, LUMO+11, LUMO+12, and LUMO+13. Hence, the primary absorption peaks of benzene-B12N12 arise from the transition from benzene to B12N12.

From the absorption spectra, it is evident that the adsorption of pyrazine and pyridine results in a reduction in the intensity of the absorption spectrum of B12N12 and induces a redshift in its absorption spectrum, albeit remaining within the ultraviolet range. In contrast, the adsorption of benzene notably amplifies the intensity of the absorption spectrum of B12N12. This phenomenon arises due to the fact that the absorption peaks observed in pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12 primarily originate from transitions from B12N12 to small molecules, whereas the absorption peaks in benzene-B12N12 primarily arise from transitions from benzene to B12N12. For accuracy, we also calculated the absorption spectra of pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12 using CAM-B3LYP/def2-TZVP,41 based on the optimized structures. As shown in Fig. S1 of the supplementary material, the intensity of absorption spectra is lower than that calculated by CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G*. In addition, the absorption spectral peaks calculated by the two basis sets are slightly shifted.

To elucidate the fluorescence emission characteristics of small molecules adsorbed on B12N12, we conducted an investigation into the single excited states of B12N12, pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, as depicted in Fig. 4. The fluorescence emission peak of B12N12 appears at around 214 nm (depicted by the black curve), with a relatively low intensity in its emission spectrum. In contrast, the emission spectrum of pyrazine-B12N12 exhibits a higher intensity compared to that of B12N12. Furthermore, the spectrum displays four distinctive emission peaks situated near 251, 262, 271, and 277 nm, as illustrated by the blue curve in Fig. 4. These fluorescence emission peaks of pyrazine-B12N12 originate from transitions between LUMO and LUMO+1 to HOMO, HOMO−3, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, and HOMO−13. In essence, the fluorescence emission peaks of pyrazine-B12N12 predominantly stem from the transition from pyrazine to B12N12. The fluorescence emission wavelengths and the corresponding transition properties are detailed in Table II.

FIG. 4.

Emission spectra of B12N12, pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, calculated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G* level.

FIG. 4.

Emission spectra of B12N12, pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12, calculated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G* level.

Close modal
TABLE II.

Fluorescence emission data for pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12.

StructuresE/λfMain configuration (transitions)Assignment
Pyrazine-B12N12 4.94/251.02 0.0605 LUMO → HOMO−13 (53%) Pyrazine → B12N12 and pyrazine 
LUMO → HOMO−6 (22%) 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (33%) 
4.72/262.46 0.0219 LUMO → HOMO−6 (20%) Pyrazine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (63%) 
4.57/271.29 0.0894 LUMO → HOMO−6 (26%) Pyrazine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (40%) 
LUMO+1 → HOMO (44%) 
4.48/277.06 0.0114 LUMO → HOMO−6 (22%) Pyrazine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (28%) 
LUMO+1 → HOMO (54%) 
Pyridine-B12N12 5.27/235.45 0.0139 LUMO → HOMO−11 (22%) Pyridine → B12N12 and pyridine 
LUMO → HOMO−6 (22%) 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (53%) 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (26%) 
5.21/237.76 0.0587 LUMO → HOMO−11 (55%) Pyridine → B12N12 and pyridine 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (28%) 
4.94/251.10 0.1480 LUMO → HOMO−7 (24%) Pyridine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−6 (37%) 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (21%) 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (42%) 
Benzene-B12N12 6.52/190.28 0.0026 LUMO+3 → HOMO (34%) B12N12 → benzene 
LUMO+14 → HOMO (47%) 
LUMO+13 → HOMO−1 (32%) 
5.98/207.45 0.0040 LUMO+7 → HOMO−1 (26%) B12N12 → benzene 
LUMO+9 → HOMO−1 (34%) 
LUMO+10 → HOMO (45%) 
StructuresE/λfMain configuration (transitions)Assignment
Pyrazine-B12N12 4.94/251.02 0.0605 LUMO → HOMO−13 (53%) Pyrazine → B12N12 and pyrazine 
LUMO → HOMO−6 (22%) 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (33%) 
4.72/262.46 0.0219 LUMO → HOMO−6 (20%) Pyrazine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (63%) 
4.57/271.29 0.0894 LUMO → HOMO−6 (26%) Pyrazine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (40%) 
LUMO+1 → HOMO (44%) 
4.48/277.06 0.0114 LUMO → HOMO−6 (22%) Pyrazine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (28%) 
LUMO+1 → HOMO (54%) 
Pyridine-B12N12 5.27/235.45 0.0139 LUMO → HOMO−11 (22%) Pyridine → B12N12 and pyridine 
LUMO → HOMO−6 (22%) 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (53%) 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (26%) 
5.21/237.76 0.0587 LUMO → HOMO−11 (55%) Pyridine → B12N12 and pyridine 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (28%) 
4.94/251.10 0.1480 LUMO → HOMO−7 (24%) Pyridine → B12N12 
LUMO → HOMO−6 (37%) 
LUMO → HOMO−5 (21%) 
LUMO → HOMO−3 (42%) 
Benzene-B12N12 6.52/190.28 0.0026 LUMO+3 → HOMO (34%) B12N12 → benzene 
LUMO+14 → HOMO (47%) 
LUMO+13 → HOMO−1 (32%) 
5.98/207.45 0.0040 LUMO+7 → HOMO−1 (26%) B12N12 → benzene 
LUMO+9 → HOMO−1 (34%) 
LUMO+10 → HOMO (45%) 

Furthermore, the fluorescence emission spectrum of pyridine-B12N12 (indicated by the red curve in Fig. 4) exhibits a significantly greater intensity compared to that of B12N12 and pyrazine-B12N12. In particular, the emission peaks of pyridine-B12N12 are characterized by three distinct peaks, and the emission data for the three typical peaks are presented in Table II. The first strong emission peak, observed at ∼251 nm, arises from transitions from LUMO to HOMO−3, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, and HOMO−7 orbitals. The remaining two typical emission peaks occur at ∼235 and 238 nm, respectively, originating from transitions from LUMO to HOMO−3, HOMO−5, HOMO−6, and HOMO−11 orbitals. Consequently, the primary emission peaks of pyridine-B12N12 predominantly stem from the transition from pyridine to B12N12. In contrast, the fluorescence emission peaks of benzene-B12N12 are observed at ∼190 and 207 nm, resulting from the transition from B12N12 to benzene. The intensity of its emission spectrum is notably weaker than that of B12N12, pyrazine-B12N12, and pyridine-B12N12, as depicted by the green curve in Fig. 4 and detailed in Table II. Therefore, the adsorption of pyridine and pyrazine not only enhances the emission spectrum of B12N12 but also induces a redshift in the emission spectrum of B12N12, whereas the adsorption of benzene weakens its intensity. This disparity arises from the fact that the emission peaks of pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12 structures transition from small molecules to B12N12, while the emission peaks of benzene-B12N12 transition from B12N12 to small molecules. We also calculated the emission spectra of pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12 using CAM-B3LYP/def2-TZVP (Fig. S1 of the supplementary material). Compared to the emission spectra calculated by CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G*, the spectra calculated using CAM-B3LYP/def2-TZVP exhibit a lower intensity and relative redshift, but it is not significant.

Finally, we analyzed the influence of the number of adsorbed small molecules on the absorption and emission spectra of B12N12 superatoms. The absorption spectra for 2pyrazine-B12N12, 4pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, 4pyridine-B12N12, 2benzene-B12N12, and 4benzene-B12N12 are depicted in Fig. 5. Their corresponding structural diagrams are presented in Fig. S2 of the supplementary material. In particular, the absorption spectra of pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyrazine-B12N12, and 4pyrazine-B12N12 are represented by blue, purple, and grayish-blue curves, respectively, in Fig. 5(a). As the number of adsorbed pyrazine molecules increases, the absorption spectra exhibit a redshift, with the spectrum of 2pyrazine-B12N12 showing a notably higher intensity. Furthermore, the absorption spectra of pyridine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, and 4pyridine-B12N12 are indicated by red, brown, and pink curves in Fig. 5(b). Among these, 2pyridine-B12N12 has the most intense absorption spectrum. A similar redshift occurs as the number of adsorbed pyridine molecules increases, although the extent of this shift varies. For benzene adsorption, the absorption spectra are shown in Fig. 5(c). The spectrum of 2benzene-B12N12 again demonstrates the greatest intensity. While the absorption spectra also redshift with increasing number of adsorbed benzene molecules, the magnitude of this shift is smaller compared to that observed with pyrazine and pyridine adsorption. Notably, benzene adsorption results in the most pronounced enhancement of the absorption spectrum of B12N12.

FIG. 5.

Absorption spectra of (a) pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyrazine-B12N12, and 4pyrazine-B12N12; (b) pyridine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, and 4pyridine-B12N12; and (c) benzene-B12N12, 2benzene-B12N12, and 4benzene-B12N12.

FIG. 5.

Absorption spectra of (a) pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyrazine-B12N12, and 4pyrazine-B12N12; (b) pyridine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, and 4pyridine-B12N12; and (c) benzene-B12N12, 2benzene-B12N12, and 4benzene-B12N12.

Close modal

In addition, Fig. 6 displays the emission spectra of B12N12 with variation in the number of adsorbed small molecules. In particular, the emission spectra of pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyrazine-B12N12, and 4pyrazine-B12N12 are represented by blue, purple, and grayish-blue curves, respectively, in Fig. 6(a). It is evident that the emission spectra intensity decreases progressively as the number of adsorbed pyrazine molecules increases, accompanied by a redshift in the emission peaks. Similarly, an increase in the number of adsorbed pyridine molecules leads to a gradual decrease in emission spectra intensity and a redshift in the emission peaks, as depicted in Fig. 6(b). Previous discussions have indicated that the emission peak of benzene-B12N12 is notably weak. In contrast, the emission peaks of 2benzene-B12N12 and 4benzene-B12N12 are significantly stronger than that of benzene-B12N12, with the emission spectra intensity of 2benzene-B12N12 being the most pronounced, as shown in Fig. 6(c). Moreover, the emission peaks of 4benzene-B12N12 exhibit a redshift relative to those of 2benzene-B12N12.

FIG. 6.

Emission spectra of (a) pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyrazine-B12N12, and 4pyrazine-B12N12; (b) pyridine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, and 4pyridine-B12N12; and (c) benzene-B12N12, 2benzene-B12N12, and 4benzene-B12N12.

FIG. 6.

Emission spectra of (a) pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyrazine-B12N12, and 4pyrazine-B12N12; (b) pyridine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, and 4pyridine-B12N12; and (c) benzene-B12N12, 2benzene-B12N12, and 4benzene-B12N12.

Close modal

In summary, the absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of pyrazine-B12N12, pyridine-B12N12, and benzene-B12N12 were investigated using first-principles. Analysis of the frontier MOs revealed that the LUMO and LUMO+1 of pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12 are predominantly localized on the pyrazine and pyridine molecules, respectively. In contrast, the HOMO and HOMO−1 of benzene-B12N12 are primarily located on the benzene molecule. These findings indicate that benzene adsorption notably enhances the absorption spectrum of B12N12, due to the absorption peaks of benzene-B12N12 mainly arising from transitions from benzene to B12N12. Conversely, the adsorption of pyrazine and pyridine significantly enhances the emission spectrum of B12N12, with pyridine showing a stronger effect. This enhancement is attributed to the emission peak transitions from the small molecules to B12N12 for pyrazine-B12N12 and pyridine-B12N12, while those of benzene-B12N12 result from transitions from B12N12 to the benzene molecules. Furthermore, the impact of the number of adsorbed small molecules on the spectra was also analyzed. The results showed that the emission spectra decrease as the number of adsorbed pyrazine or pyridine molecules increases. However, the absorption spectra of 2pyrazine-B12N12 and 2pyridine-B12N12 are more intense. In addition, both the absorption and emission spectra of 2benzene-B12N12 are stronger than those of benzene-B12N12 and 4benzene-B12N12. Therefore, small molecule adsorption enhances the absorption and emission spectra of B12N12, but the effects vary depending on the category and number of adsorbed molecules. Our work offers new insights into the design of luminescent materials.

See the supplementary material for the relative energies, the absorption and emission spectra calculated by CAM-B3LYP/def2-TZVP, and structural diagrams of 2pyrazine-B12N12, 4pyrazine-B12N12, 2pyridine-B12N12, 4pyridine-B12N12, 2benzene-B12N12, and 4benzene-B12N12.

This work was financially supported by the Education Department of Jilin Province (Grant Nos. JJKH20230510KJ and JJKH20180426KJ), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Jilin Province (Grant Nos. YDZJ202101ZYTS075 and 20220101039JC), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11947039).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Jia Wang contributed to the initial conception; participated in the calculation work, theoretical analysis, and results presentation and interpretation; and drafted the manuscript. Meiqi Wang participated in drafting. Ming-Xing Song participated in spectral calculation and analysis. Bo Wang contributed to the initial conception and manuscript revisions. Zhengkun Qin supervised the research and contributed to manuscript writing. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Jia Wang: Investigation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead). Meiqi Wang: Methodology (equal). Ming-Xing Song: Formal analysis (equal). Bo Wang: Formal analysis (equal). Zhengkun Qin: Conceptualization (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
J.
Li
,
X.
Li
,
H. J.
Zhai
, and
L. S.
Wang
,
Science
299
(
5608
),
864
867
(
2003
).
2.
W. D.
Knight
,
K.
Clemenger
,
W. A.
De Heer
,
W. A.
Saunders
,
M. Y.
Chou
, and
M. L.
Cohen
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
53
(
5
),
510
(
1984
).
3.
D. E.
Bergeron
,
A. W.
Castleman
,
T.
Morisato
, and
S. N.
Khanna
,
Science
304
(
5667
),
84
87
(
2004
).
4.
M.
Feng
,
J.
Zhao
, and
H.
Petek
,
Science
320
(
5874
),
359
362
(
2008
).
5.
R.
He
and
X. C.
Zeng
,
Chem. Commun.
51
(
15
),
3185
3188
(
2015
).
6.
J.
Wang
,
T.
Yu
,
Y.
Gao
, and
Z.
Wang
,
Sci. China Mater.
60
(
12
),
1264
1268
(
2017
).
7.
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhang
,
M.
Wang
,
M.-X.
Song
,
B.
Wang
, and
Z.
Qin
,
RSC Adv.
13
(
40
),
27957
27963
(
2023
).
8.
G.
Seifert
,
P. W.
Fowler
,
D.
Mitchell
,
D.
Porezag
, and
T.
Frauenheim
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
268
(
5–6
),
352
358
(
1997
).
9.
W.
Xie
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
X.
Wu
,
Z.
Wang
, and
R.-Q.
Zhang
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
124
(
6
),
3881
3885
(
2020
).
10.
C. W.
Hamilton
,
R. T.
Baker
,
A.
Staubitz
, and
I.
Manners
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
38
(
1
),
279
293
(
2009
).
11.
N. S.
Venkataramanan
,
R. V.
Belosludov
,
R.
Note
,
R.
Sahara
,
H.
Mizuseki
, and
Y.
Kawazoe
,
Chem. Phys.
377
(
1–3
),
54
59
(
2010
).
12.
G.
Ganguly
,
T.
Malakar
, and
A.
Paul
,
Chemsuschem
9
(
12
),
1386
1391
(
2016
).
13.
G.
Ganguly
,
D.
Halder
,
A.
Banerjee
,
S.
Basu
, and
A.
Paul
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
7
(
11
),
9808
9821
(
2019
).
14.
N.
Abdolahi
,
M.
Aghaei
,
A.
Soltani
,
Z.
Azmoodeh
,
H.
Balakheyli
, and
F.
Heidari
,
Spectrochim. Acta, Part A
204
,
348
353
(
2018
).
15.
M. K.
Hazrati
,
Z.
Javanshir
, and
Z.
Bagheri
,
J. Mol. Graph. Modell.
77
,
17
24
(
2017
).
16.
M. B.
Javan
,
A.
Soltani
,
Z.
Azmoodeh
,
N.
Abdolahi
, and
N.
Gholami
,
RSC Adv.
6
(
106
),
104513
104521
(
2016
).
17.
H.
Xu
,
X. X.
Tu
,
G. H.
Fan
,
Q.
Wang
,
X. H.
Wang
, and
X. F.
Chu
,
J. Mol. Liq.
318
,
114315
(
2020
).
18.
R.
Pino-Rios
,
E.
Chigo-Anota
,
E.
Shakerzadeh
, and
G.
Cárdenas-Jirón
,
Physica E
115
,
113697
(
2020
).
19.
R.
Geetha Sadasivan Nair
,
A. K.
Narayanan Nair
, and
S.
Sun
,
Energy Fuels
37
(
18
),
14053
14063
(
2023
).
20.
S.
Sinthika
,
E. M.
Kumar
,
V. J.
Surya
,
Y.
Kawazoe
,
N.
Park
,
K.
Iyakutti
, and
R.
Thapa
,
Sci. Rep.
5
(
1
),
17460
(
2015
).
21.
M. D.
Esrafili
and
R.
Nurazar
,
Superlattices Microstruct.
67
,
54
60
(
2014
).
22.
E.
Vessally
,
M. D.
Esrafili
,
R.
Nurazar
,
P.
Nematollahi
, and
A.
Bekhradnia
,
Struct. Chem.
28
,
735
748
(
2017
).
23.
R. G.
Parr
,
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
34
(
1
),
631
656
(
1983
).
24.
T.
Oku
,
A.
Nishiwaki
, and
I.
Narita
,
Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater.
5
(
5–6
),
635
638
(
2004
).
25.
S.
Grimme
,
J.
Antony
,
S.
Ehrlich
, and
H.
Krieg
,
J. Chem. Phys.
132
(
15
),
154104
(
2010
).
26.
C.
Lee
,
W.
Yang
, and
R. G.
Parr
,
Phys. Rev. B
37
(
2
),
785
789
(
1988
).
27.
B.
Miehlich
,
A.
Savin
,
H.
Stoll
, and
H.
Preuss
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
157
(
3
),
200
206
(
1989
).
28.
W. J.
Hehre
,
R.
Ditchfield
, and
J. A.
Pople
,
J. Chem. Phys.
56
(
5
),
2257
2261
(
1972
).
29.
V. A.
Rassolov
,
J. A.
Pople
,
M. A.
Ratner
, and
T. L.
Windus
,
J. Chem. Phys.
109
(
4
),
1223
1229
(
1998
).
30.
V. A.
Rassolov
,
M. A.
Ratner
,
J. A.
Pople
,
P. C.
Redfern
, and
L. A.
Curtiss
,
J. Comput. Chem.
22
(
9
),
976
984
(
2001
).
31.
E.
Runge
and
E. K. U.
Gross
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
52
(
12
),
997
1000
(
1984
).
32.
M. A.
Marques
and
E. K.
Gross
,
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
55
(
1
),
427
455
(
2004
).
33.
A. D.
Laurent
and
D.
Jacquemin
,
Int. J. Quantum Chem.
113
(
17
),
2019
2039
(
2013
).
34.
T.
Yanai
,
D. P.
Tew
, and
N. C.
Handy
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
393
(
1–3
),
51
57
(
2004
).
35.
D.
Kannar
,
A.
Tajti
, and
P. G.
Szalay
,
J. Chem. Theory Comput.
13
(
1
),
202
209
(
2017
).
36.
M. P.
Bircher
and
U.
Rothlisberger
,
J. Chem. Theory Comput.
14
(
6
),
3184
3195
(
2018
).
37.
B.
Komjáti
,
Á.
Urai
,
S.
Hosztafi
,
J.
Kökösi
,
B.
Kováts
,
J.
Nagy
, and
P.
Horváth
,
Spectrochim. Acta, Part A
155
,
95
102
(
2016
).
38.
R.
Kobayashi
and
R. D.
Amos
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
420
(
1–3
),
106
109
(
2006
).
39.
M. J.
Frisch
,
G. W.
Trucks
,
H. B.
Schlegel
,
G. E.
Scuseria
,
M. A.
Robb
,
J. R.
Cheeseman
,
G.
Scalmani
,
V.
Barone
,
B.
Mennucci
,
G. A.
Petersson
,
H.
Nakatsuji
,
M.
Caricato
,
X.
Li
,
A. V.
Marenich
,
J.
Bloino
,
B. G.
Janesko
,
R.
Gomperts
,
B.
Mennucci
,
H. P.
Hratchian
,
J. V.
Ortiz
,
A. F.
Izmaylov
,
J. L.
Sonnenberg
,
F. D.
Williams
,
F.
Lipparini
,
F.
Egidi
,
J.
Goings
,
B.
Peng
,
A.
Petrone
,
T.
Henderson
,
D.
Ranasinghe
,
V. G.
Zakrzewski
,
J.
Gao
,
N.
Rega
,
G.
Zheng
,
W.
Liang
,
M.
Hada
,
M.
Ehara
,
K.
Toyota
,
R.
Fukuda
,
J.
Hasegawa
,
M.
Ishida
,
T.
Nakajima
,
Y.
Honda
,
O.
Kitao
,
H.
Nakai
,
T.
Vreven
,
K.
Throssell
,
J. A.
Montgomery
, Jr.
,
J. E.
Peralta
,
F.
Ogliaro
,
M. J.
Bearpark
,
J. J.
Heyd
,
E. N.
Brothers
,
K. N.
Kudin
,
V. N.
Staroverov
,
T. A.
Keith
,
R.
Kobayashi
,
J.
Normand
,
K.
Raghavachari
,
A. P.
Rendell
,
J. C.
Burant
,
S. S.
Iyengar
,
J.
Tomasi
,
M.
Cossi
,
J. M.
Millam
,
M.
Klene
,
C.
Adamo
,
R.
Cammi
,
J. W.
Ochterski
,
R. L.
Martin
,
K.
Morokuma
, and
J. B. F. O.
Farkas
, and
D. J.
Fox
,
Gaussian
16
,
Revision C.01
,
Gaussian, Inc
.,
Wallingford CT
,
2016
.
40.
P.
Fallahi
,
H.
Jouypazadeh
, and
H.
Farrokhpour
,
J. Mol. Liq.
260
,
138
148
(
2018
).
41.
F.
Weigend
and
R.
Ahlrichs
,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
7
(
18
),
3297
3305
(
2005
).