The realization of multifunction by simply combining acoustic devices together is always attractive, but it is never an easy task due to the complexity of most acoustic metamaterials. In this paper, a kind of unbalanced gain–loss acoustic metasurface is designed, which can work as an energy amplifier, suggesting that it may be applied to an acoustic signal detector or a sensor. In addition, an acoustic negative refraction system is established by simply putting two of these metasurfaces together, which can produce negative refraction for the acoustic waves from different directions and different incident angles, even focusing and imaging with precisely selected parameters. These functions are quite rare for materials without the double-negative-parameter. This work provides a new route to use the gain/loss materials and achieve multifunctions without complex design.
The control of acoustic wave transmission is always a puzzling problem and challenging project for scientists. The past few decades saw intriguing achievements in acoustic metamaterials, such as double negative materials,1–3 zero-index metamaterials,4,5 and acoustic wave clocking,6,7 providing unprecedented methods to this problem. In recent years, the development of metasurface8 furnishes more chances on the research of wave manipulation. Metasurface is an expansion of the metamaterial, with well-designed units in subwavelength scale to control the reflection, transmission, and direction of an acoustic wave, for example, the ultrathin Schroeder diffuser,9 subwavelength acoustic absorber,10–13 acoustic metalens,14–16 and coding metasurface.17–22 Among them, the appliance of gain–loss acoustic metamaterials has been a new approach to manipulate the wave; the elaborately modulated balanced gain–loss acoustic materials are a research focus of parity-time (PT) symmetric acoustics.23 Although the concept of PT-symmetry was originally introduced from quantum mechanics,24 several interesting physical properties have been deeply studied in PT-symmetric acoustics. For instance, the exception point (EP), where the two eigenstates coalesce at the same time, results in many interesting phenomena, such as unidirectional invisibility,25,26 asymmetric diffraction,27 and single-side beam splitting,28 has been realized both in theory and experiment. In optics and electronics, the coherent perfect absorber (CPA)-laser point existing in the broken phase, where the eigenvalues of the scattering matrix of the PT-symmetric system become zero and infinity simultaneously, which correspond to the states of a CPA and laser, respectively, is another research highlight in optics and electronics.29,30 In acoustics, the system with similar physical properties is called a CPA-sound amplification by stimulated emission of radiation(saser) system,31,32 corresponding to the concept of CPA-laser, which provides a brand-new way for acoustic wave manipulation and acoustic logic gates and so on. Besides the PT-symmetric system, the conventional metasurface made by unbalanced gain–loss pairs can also cause unconventional physical phenomena. In this work, we design an acoustic amplifier based on a pair of unbalanced gain–loss regions, which does not satisfy the PT-symmetric condition but can also have a saser point. The significant enhancement of the amplitude of the incident acoustic wave can be achieved at the saser point for a specific frequency, which means a great potential to be a great signal detector and a hypersensitive sensor. Based on this system, we propose a double unbalanced negative refractive system realized by two parallel metasurfaces. We also find the designed system can work as a metalens based on our research, having good focusing and imaging capability if designed carefully.
A. Properties of one single unbalanced gain–loss saser system
Based on all the studies above, we calculate the amplitude and phase of the transmitted and right (left) reflected waves and depict them in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), which shows that the amplitudes of the transmission, left-refection, and right-refection coefficients all become extremely large values and that means the unbalanced gain–loss metasurface has a saser effect at the frequency of 2820 Hz, and there is a π phase jump for all of them at this frequency as well. The existence of the poles means that the T22 in the transfer matrix T is zero; thus, the matrix can be revised as at the frequency of 2820 Hz. Moreover, we define the scattering matrix to study the system further. The eigenvalues of the scattering matrix are derived as . As shown in Fig. 2(c), the absolute value of one of the eigenvalue comes to infinity and the other one at 2820 Hz, which also indicates saser point at this frequency. We also study the influence of the background medium around on the system, and the result is shown in Fig. 2(d). It is shown that when the background medium is air, the saser point occurs even when the frequency of the incident wave is at its operating frequency f = 2820 Hz. These physical properties show the potential of the system to be a specific-frequency sound energy amplifier or an acoustic signal detector or a sensor to detect the slight change in the surrounding medium under different circumstances. In Fig. 3, we present the amplitude of reflection coefficient (in dB) for the right-incident wave as a function of varying imaginary parts of the gain (loss) materials, indicating that the saser point of this metasurface only achieves when the refractive indices of the materials set just at those points, and the system needs to be carefully designed in view of this. The zero point on this picture indicates the EP point of the PT-symmetric system with the same geometric design of the unbalanced gain–loss system, which has been studied in previous studies.23,25–28
B. Design of the unbalanced gain–loss negative refraction system
1. Negative refraction
For oblique incidence, the density should be revised as ρG(L)(θ) = ρG(L)/cos θ and cG(L)(θ) = cG(L) cos θG(L) with the change of incident angle θ to keep the system working, where θG(L) denotes the complex propagating angle in the gain (loss) region. For θ = 35° and 55°, the sound pressure field distributions calculated numerically by using FEM software COMSOL Multiphysics are shown in Figs. 5(b), 5(e), 5(c), and 5(f). The red and white arrows in these pictures denote the different propagation directions of the sound in each area incident from the left side and right side, respectively. The vanish of the forward propagating wave can be observed in both of the incident directions and with different incident angles, showing the bidirectional negative refraction capability of the UGNRS.
2. Focusing and imaging
The ability of negative refraction with different angles of the UGNRS inspires us to design a negative refraction focusing and imaging system, i.e., a kind of metalens. As shown in Fig. 6, a harmonic monopole source at the saser point is placed at a distance of o from the system (o < d), and the sound rays are focused again at two different points, forming two real images, both at a distance i = d − o from the right surface based on the geometric relationship. The incident angle should be put as θ = tan−1(y/o) in this case depending on the position in the y-axis of the metasurface, so the parameters of the gain–loss region should be revised correspondingly. According to the calculated results, the negative refraction occurs whether the acoustic wave is incident from left or right, so the focusing and imaging of the system should be bidirectional as well. In Figs. 7(a)–7(d), a 2820 Hz point source is located 625 mm away from the system in each case, with its source intensity set at 10−3 m2/s, and the distance between the two surfaces is 1250 mm, so the incident angle is θ = tan−1(2 y/d). It is significant to note that although the transmission direction of the wave when propagating through the metasurface is hardly along the normal direction of the surface, the change in refraction indices and densities in the y direction of the gain–loss materials has little effect on the propagation because the thickness of the metasurface is only 2l = 50 mm ≈ 0.41λ0. λ0 is the wavelength of the acoustic wave with the frequency of 2820 Hz in air. From the pictures, we can see two real images emerge at the center of the middle region and the other side in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b) as we predict before. Furthermore, Fig. 7(e) implies the sound intensity on the imaging side along the y direction at a distance of 625 mm from the surface. This picture shows that the 3 dB beam width is around 60 mm, which is about half the wavelength at the operating frequency, implying a quite high resolution of this imaging system. In addition, Figs. 7(c) and 7(d) show that the system works well in focusing and imaging at the frequency of 2550 and 3450 Hz, respectively, despite being designed at the saser point, which demonstrates the stability of this device.
III. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we theoretically and numerically investigate an unbalanced gain–loss system. A single metasurface made of a pair of the unbalanced gain–loss regions can produce an extremely high amplification on both the reflectance and transmittance simultaneously at its saser point, which provides a new approach to detecting single frequency acoustic signal and sensitive sensor for surrounding medium besides amplifying the energy of incident wave. Then, the unbalanced gain–loss negative refraction system based on two parallel metasurfaces is studied, which can act as a metalens achieving bidirectional negative refraction and planar focusing.
The negative refraction system based on parity-time symmetric metasurfaces has been studied before.29,30,32 For a PT-symmetric negative refraction system with the same geometric design as the unbalanced gain–loss saser system in this work, whose refractive indices are nG(L) = 1 ± 0.585i, we calculate the properties by using the TMM as well, and the amplitudes and phases of transmission, left-reflection, and right-reflection coefficients of the PT-symmetric CPA-saser system and the eigenvalues of its scattering matrix are in Figs. 8(a)–8(c), respectively. Comparing the two different designs, we find that the system comes to a CPA point when approaching the saser point (in this case, 3180 Hz) in the PT-symmetric system but there is no CPA point in an unbalanced gain–loss saser system. For the transfer matrix of a PT-symmetric system, the element T11 is always equal to T22, which indicates that at its CPA-saser point, T11 = T22 = 0. Therefore, the reflection of the PT-symmetric negative refraction system with the same design in Fig. 4(a) vanishes based on Eq. (4), and results of numerical simulation in Fig. 8(d) prove it. Although leading to reflection loss, the design of the unbalanced gain–loss system provides a much more flexible approach to negative refraction because for a specific frequency, the saser effect may not occur in the PT-symmetric system. For instance, at the frequency of 2820 Hz, there cannot be saser effect in a PT-symmetric system according to Fig. 2. The results of this work show the potential of the gain–loss system, even unbalanced, of a new kind of multifunctional metamaterial.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFA0211400), the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (Grant No. 11834008), the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12174192), the State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. SKLA202210), the Key Laboratory of Underwater Acoustic Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. SSHJ-KFKT-1701), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20210541), the Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No.21KJB140003), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20210541), and the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 21KJB140003).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Zhonghan Fei: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (equal); Resources (equal); Software (lead); Validation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). Jun Lan: Conceptualization (supporting); Methodology (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Menyang Gong: Software (supporting); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yun Lai: Writing – review & editing (equal). Xiaozhou Liu: Funding acquisition (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal).
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.