The deuteron transverse relaxation properties of polyethylene oxide melts of four different molecular weights, covering the range from the onset of entanglements to the regime of fully entangled chains, are investigated using Hahn echo decays over an extensive time interval up to ten times the effective transverse spin relaxation time. The results are compared to predictions based on the Rouse and reptation formalisms, taking into account the dynamical heterogeneity of linear polymer chains produced by the end segments. The experimental results can be described qualitatively by a combination of both models, with the contribution of reptation dynamics increasing with growing chain length. The transition is continuous, rather than being characterized by sharp regime boundaries. Up to a molecular weight of 300.000 g/mol, the predicted limit of pure reptation dynamics is not yet reached. Quantitative deviations from the predicted decays as computed by numerical procedures become observable toward the long-time limit of the Hahn echo decays and are being discussed in terms of shortcomings of the available reptation theories.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) has traditionally been a powerful approach to verify and improve dynamic models of polymer dynamics in the melt state, the best-known concepts of which are represented by the Rouse model for short and unentangled chains, and the reptation model for long and multiple entangled molecules (see, for example, Refs. 16 and articles cited therein). In the most general terms, the essence of the various NMR methods is that the spin subsystem of the substance under study, which is initially in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium, is manipulated by a particular sequence of radiofrequency pulses and measures the dynamic response of the system to this influence. The time dependence of the measured signal depends on the nature of spins' fluctuations in space. Therefore, the measured signal can be expressed through dynamic correlation functions, which, on the other hand, can be theoretically predicted based on existing dynamic models. A comparison of experimental data with theoretical predictions, in turn, provides a basis for improving our understanding of the dynamics and structure of the systems under study.

The Hahn echo (HE) is one of the technically simplest methods of pulsed NMR methods, which have been used for decades in the experimental investigation of polymer dynamics (see, for example, Refs. 714). It is the response of spins of the investigated system on two radiofrequency pulses. The experiment begins with a defined situation of all spins contained in the sample being placed in a temporarily constant magnetic field oriented, by definition, along the z axis and being in their thermodynamic equilibrium state, i.e., with the total magnetization oriented along z and assuming the Curie equilibrium value. Following an initial resonant radiofrequency pulse, Pxπ/2 as written in its operator representation, the magnetization is rotated by an angle of π/2 relative to the x axis, so that a non-equilibrium state of the spin system is created. Following a time interval τ, the spin system is irradiated by a second radiofrequency pulse Pxπ rotating the magnetization by the angle π relative to the x axis. The experimentally observed response of the spin system on the two described radiofrequency pulses at time moment t = 2τ is named the Hahn echo. After the first pulse Pxπ/2, the so-called Free Induction Decay (FID) is observed, caused by the precession of the non-equilibrium magnetization around the magnetic field, which induces an oscillating voltage in the receiver coil. The FID decays, on the one hand, by dephasing due to the distribution of Larmor frequencies either by inhomogeneous magnetic fields within the sample volume or by the multiplicity of chemical shifts and, on the other hand, by fluctuations in the internal electromagnetic fields that allow spin transitions and are modulated by the molecular motions that affect the spin system. The latter effect is called NMR relaxation in its proper sense. While the dephasing effect may be neglected for short evolution times under favorable conditions, such as the high homogeneity typically achieved in commercial NMR spectrometers and in substances possessing only a single chemically distinct spin with one single chemical shift, the actual signal decay due to molecular motions can be isolated by compensating this dephasing effect using the Hahn echo. The decaying part of it is fully equivalent to the initial FID. For observation times exceeding the inverse of the Larmor frequency spread by either inhomogeneous fields or chemical shift differences, a Hahn echo or a similar echo sequence will be the method of choice. This paper will present the original experimental results obtained by the Hahn echo method, so, henceforth, we will discuss about it considering, by default, that the Hahn echo is completely analogous to the FID for a system of equivalent spins in a perfectly homogeneous magnetic field.

Possibilities of modern NMR spectrometers allow for experimental investigation of the Hahn echo over a period of time corresponding to a signal decay to at least 10−3–10−4 times of the initial HE magnitude. However, the theoretical interpretation of the HE on such a long period of time will, at least in polymer melts, meet difficulties of a principal character that are connected to the still unresolved many-body problem of statistical mechanics. In fact, in polymer melts, a theoretically justified and analytically tractable approximation can be formulated only for shorter time periods t<T2eff, where T2eff is the effective spin–spin relaxation time defined by the relation gT2eff=e1, with gt being the normalized HE signal at time moment t=2τ and the condition g0=1 (see, for example, Refs. 1519). Within this time range, it is possible to limit the consideration to calculations of the second moment of magnetization, dependent on dynamic lattice pair-correlation functions. Higher-order moments, in addition to becoming cumbersome to compute, also contain higher-order dynamic correlation functions, which make them analytically intractable today. A common extrapolation to long times in such situations is the so-called Anderson–Weiss approximation, i.e., a second cumulant approximation based on the assumption that all higher-order moments can be expressed through the second moment. In essence, this means that in the general situation, the Anderson–Weiss approximation is theoretically justified within the same time limits as the second moment approximation. In our recent studies,20–22 it has been shown that for the case of the tube-reptation model, assuming the central role in modern treatments of polymer melt dynamics, the description can, indeed, be extended beyond the Anderson–Weiss approximation if the time dependence of the HE for deuteron spins is considered, the relaxation of which is mainly determined by intramolecular interactions.

The main purpose of this article is to investigate experimentally the HE in deuterated melts of well-defined polyethylene oxides with different molecular masses as a function of temperature and to attempt a quantitative interpretation in terms of the above-mentioned approach.

In this section, we will provide the necessary information related to the theory of the dynamics of macromolecules, adhering to the terminology and notation of the classical monograph.23 In accordance with the phenomenological tube-reptation model, which is currently the dominating concept in the theory of macromolecular dynamics in polymer melts with sufficiently large molecular masses NNe—where N is the number of Kuhn segments per macromolecule and Ne is a phenomenological number treated as the average number of Kuhn segments between two entanglements23—the spatial displacement of macromolecules takes place inside “tubes” formed by the surrounding medium with the diameter a=bNe1/2, where b is the Kuhn segment length of polymer chains. The discussed model contains four characteristic time scales: the segmental relaxation time τs, the entanglement time τe=τsNe2, the Rouse relaxation time τR = τsN2, and the tube disengagement, or terminal relaxation, time τd = 3τRZ = 3τeZ3, with the number of entanglements per chain Z = N/Ne. In accordance with these time scales, the following regimes of motions are distinguished:

  1. Regime I, or Rouse (non-entangled) regime of motions, for the interval tτe, where polymer chains are moving in accordance with the Rouse model (see details, for example, in Refs. 2327).

  2. Regime II, or regime of incoherent reptation, for the interval τetτR. Due to the entanglements between different polymer chains, each chain effectively becomes confined inside a tube with diameter a and performs one-dimensional anomalous Rouse diffusion with an exponent 1/2 for the time dependence of mean squared displacements inside their own tube. In this regime, parts of the chain that are sufficiently separated, i.e., by more than t/τs segments along the chain, are moving independently from each other. The total mean squared displacement of polymer segments in space is changed here as r2tb2Ne1/2t/τs1/4. The length of the tube is computed as LT=aZ=bNNe1/2. The central line of the tube, the so-called primitive path, can be considered as an ideal chain constructed from primitive segments of length a.

  3. Regime III, or regime of coherent reptation, for the interval τRtτd. The polymer chains still remain confined in their initial tubes, but perform normal one-dimensional Rouse diffusion inside the tube, when different polymer segments are moving coherently with each other and the mean square displacement inside the tube is proportional to time with total mean squared displacement r2tb2Z1/2t/τs1/2.

  4. Regime IV, or regime of normal diffusion, for the interval tτd. The polymer chains escape from their initial tubes and perform normal (Gaussian) diffusion with the diffusion coefficient Dcm=13π2Nb2τd=19π2b2NeτsN2=19π2a2τeZ2.

Note also that in the tube-reptation model, all polymer chains are considered as ideal chains, which seems to be an acceptable approximation for polymer melts in the light of Flory’s ideality hypothesis (see, for example, Refs. 2326). Given a polymer chain consisting of N Kuhn segments, it can also be viewed as consisting of N/Z primitive segments, each of which contains Ne ordinary Kuhn segments. Since Ne ≫ 1, any primitive segment of the polymer chain can be considered as an ideal Gaussian chain with the mean-squared length of the primitive segment a2 = b2Ne.

In this work, due to the limitations of the experimental procedure, we are mainly interested in regimes II and III. The curvilinear mean-squared displacement inside the tube of polymer segments at corresponding times can be approximated by the following expression:28 

(1)

The normalized HE amplitude of 2H spins [i.e., gDt=0 = 1] at times tτs can be represented through the spatial orientations of Kuhn segments by the following relation (see, for example, Refs. 11, 12, and 18):

(2)

where ωQ is the intensity of quadrupole interaction expressed in frequency units, θkt1 is the angle between the vector connecting the ends of the segment of number k and the direction of the external magnetic field at time moment t1, and ⟨⋯⟩ represents the average over all stochastic trajectories of the polymer chains during the experimentally investigated time interval t. The quadrupole coupling constant in frequency units ωQ in expression (2) is related to the quadrupole coupling constant e2qQ2π2, which is contained in the Hamiltonian of the spin–lattice and spin–spin interactions, where eQ is the quadrupole moment of the nucleus and eq is the electric field gradient at the location of the nucleus (see, for example, Refs. 1519). Our ωQ is proportional to this quantity, ωQ=αss5234e2qQ2, where αss < 1 is a constant taking into account the fast intrasegmental motions averaging the major part of quadrupole interactions at times tτs. The numerical factor αss < 1 is not easily calculated from the first principles; therefore, we will consider ωQ as a fitting parameter. This, of course, leaves the question about the actual meaning of a numerical coefficient such as αss that, in the end, is obtained from comparing an expression with the experimental data. We will adhere, as in previous studies, to the following strategy: we will keep all the numerical coefficients that can be calculated exactly or estimated with sufficient accuracy. In the end, we will always be able to examine their importance by comparing the calculations with experimental results.

In the tube-reptation model, it is assumed that at times tτe, the polymer segments carry out the fast fluctuations inside the tube about their primitive paths. At temperatures when the polymer is in the molten state, in all realistic experimental conditions, the entanglement time τeT2eff, allowing to rewrite expression (2) as follows:22 

(3)

where

(4)

is the factor connected with the fast fluctuations of polymer segments inside the tube and

(5)

is the factor connected with reptation motions along the primitive path. The time T2fast is expected to be of the order of the effective spin–spin relaxation time in polymer melts with a molecular mass measured in units of Kuhn segments of about Ne, and is, in situations where NNe, much longer than the corresponding T2eff(N), i.e., T2fastT2eff(Ne)T2eff(NNe).

In our recent work,21 the HE of deuteron spins in non-entangled polymer melts, i.e., with molecular masses NNe, was considered in the light of the dynamical heterogeneity of linear polymer chains, i.e., taking into account the end effects (some additional materials connected with the influence of dynamical heterogeneity on NMR spin relaxation can be found in the literature29–33). Assuming that the chains under these conditions are moving as Rouse chains, it was shown that the time dependence of the HE can be represented in the notation of this paper by the following relation:

(6)

This case takes into account a distribution of the spin–spin relaxation times T̃2,nR: spins located at different segments have different relaxation times, i.e., the faster relaxing spins are in the central regions of the chain. The dependence of the relaxation times T̃2,nR is logarithmic, and the initial rate of decay is approximately

(7)

The molecular mass dependence of expression (7) is consistent with the well-known result for intramolecular proton relaxation.30,31 The logarithmic dependence is rather weak, and thus T2fast in expression (4) can be estimated as

(8)

The most important factor in expression (3) that totally controls the deuteron spins HE at long times, but still tT2fast, is the gtbDt connected with slow reptation of polymer molecules inside the tube. The formal mathematical construction of expression (5) is identical with the initial expression (2). The difference lies in the meaning of the mathematical variables. The summation in expression (5) is carried out not over Kuhn segments, as in relation (2), but over primitive segments—ω̃Q is the residual part of the deuteron spins quadrupole interactions after averaging over the fast local fluctuations inside the tube during times of order τe, θkt1 is the angle between the vector connecting the ends of the primitive segment with number k with the direction of the external magnetic field at time moment t1, and the averaging ⟨⋯⟩rep is performed over all reptation motions of the primitive chain. The residual part of the quadrupolar interaction constant ω̃Q, describing the coupling of deuteron spins with orientations of primitive segments, is related to the corresponding quadrupole coupling constant ωQ of deuteron spins with Kuhn segment orientations, which, in usual treatment, is evaluated as ω̃QωQ/Ne (see, for example, Refs. 1 and 29). Therefore, we will introduce here a numerical factor β that depends on the specific assumptions about the configuration of the primitive path,

(9)

The treatment of gtbDt is essentially different for short chains, for which the so-called Redfield limit (or the limit of fast motions) T2effτd holds, and for long chains in the opposite case when T2effτd.

In the first case, the dynamic heterogeneity of linear macromolecules was considered in a recent paper21 (some additional materials can be found in Refs. 3236). The deuteron FID/HE of polymer chains is totally dominated by the end effects and can be expressed by the following relation:

(10)

Note that here we corrected the denominators inside the exponent in expression (10) in comparison to Ref. 21 by changing Z to Z + 1. This is done because a chain containing Z segments has Z + 1 segment ends. This difference is not important when the segment number k is considered as a continuous variable ranging from 0 to Z, as is done in the classical book,23 but can produce artifacts in numerical calculations, when the integration over k will be implemented by a summation as in expression (10), at long times when gtbDt<Z1.

For Z ≫ 1, the discussed expression (10) has the following asymptotic values:

(11)

The initial decay is an exponential function with the average relaxation rate 1/T̃2eff=ω̃Q2τeZ24π2/9, followed by a drastically decreasing decay that follows a power law with exponent −1, again turning into an exponential decay at even longer times.

In the Redfield limit, the magnetizations of all subsets of spins are decaying exponentially, but spins located on different segments have different spin–spin relaxation rates. As a result, during the time interval T̃2efftZT̃2eff/6, the decay transforms into a power-law with exponent −1. At longer times, the decay again becomes exponential with the longest spin–spin relaxation time T2long6T̃2eff/Z, which has a molecular mass dependence different from that of T̃2eff. The Redfield limit is actually a special limit of the Anderson–Weiss approximation, which in general form for the reptation factor of the HE, i.e., gtbDt, can be described by the following expression (see, for example, Ref. 21):

(12)

Note that expressions (10) and (11) follow asymptotically from (12) in the limit τdT2eff.

For longer chains, when T2effτd, the Redfield limit is violated and the HE decay is essentially more complex than expressions (10) and (11). The usual approach for such situations is to use the so-called Anderson–Weiss or second cumulant approximation, which, as mentioned above, is given for the reptation model by expression (12) but can be justified only for short times tT2eff. However, as has been shown in Refs. 20 and 22, the reptation model allows us to go significantly beyond the Anderson–Weiss approximation. This is possible because the Doi–Edwards tube reptation model is based on very strong assumptions.

One of these assumptions is the postulate that during the wide range of times τetτd, the polymer chains are mainly confined inside tubes and are escaping from them by one-dimensional Rouse-like motions along primitive paths. Another postulate is that the primitive path possess the conformation of an ideal chain, which corresponds to the requirement that the spatial orientation of its different primitive segments is statistically independent of each other. The latter allows us to perform averaging over the orientations of primitive segments in expression (5) independently of each other. Then, knowing that diffusion inside the tube is Rousean, by using mean field-like approximations, one can calculate the time in which the segment of the macromolecule initially localized on the kth primitive segment of the tube spent during the observation time t on the nth primitive segment of the initial tube.

The final result for gtbDt caused by reptation motions inside the tube is as follows:22 

(13)

Summation over k in expression (13) is the signal contribution from the spin that, at the initial time moment t = 0, was located inside the primitive segment with number k of the initial tube. Summation over n inside of the exponents in expression (13) reflects the one-dimensional Rousean displacements of it inside the initial tube. With an increase in the observation time t, the polymer segments change their positions inside the initial tube and can be located in the position where the primitive segment with number n was located initially. Generally speaking, the segment with number k does not spend the complete observation time t inside the initial tube since it can exit from it. We call t̃k,t the period that segment k spends inside the tube during t, so that it has spent tt̃k,t outside of it. For t̃k,t, one can make the following approximation22 for times tτd:

(14)

where ñt=s2t1/2/a is the characteristic number of primitive segments on which polymer segments are displaced inside the tube during time interval t and s2t is the mean squared displacement of polymer segments inside the tube, which can be approximated by relation (1).

The quantity φknt̃k,t is defined by the following relation:22 

(15)

As has been discussed above, in comparison to expression (32) in Ref. 22, Z has been replaced by Z + 1 in the second exponent. The second term inside the integral depending on the sum of the numbers n + k of primitive segments, i.e., on the position relative to the ends of the polymer chain, describes the dynamical heterogeneity of the polymer chain arising from end segments. As time increases, this contribution increases as well, since an increasing number of segments can be considered as end segments; in other words, the effect of end segments has a frequency nature, i.e., depends on observation time.

The expressions (1), (3), and (13)(15) allow a closed description of the HE of reptating chains for long time interval τetτd in terms of ω̃Q, Z, τe, and a. For qualitative comparison, some analytical asymptotic expressions following from expression (13) are of interest:22 

The initial (τetT2eff) behavior of the HE depends on the relationships between the effective spin–spin relaxation time T2eff and the characteristic relaxation times of the tube-reptation model τe, τR, and τd. If the polymer chains are long enough, then, at temperatures typical for melts, the relation τeT2effτR is valid. For this case, the deuteron HE reflects motions of polymers in the region of incoherent reptation, i.e., in region II. The initial HE will be a pseudo-Gaussian with exponent 7/4,

(16)

with an effective spin relaxation time

(17)

For shorter chains satisfying the relation τRT2effτd, the HE reflects motions of the polymer chains in the region of coherent reptation, i.e., in region III. The initial time dependence of the HE is again pseudo-Gaussian, but with an exponent 3/2,

(18)

with the effective spin-relaxation time

(19)

At longer times T2efftτd, the time dependence of gtbDt—within an accuracy of logarithmic corrections—becomes a stretched exponential with the detailed properties differing between the regions of incoherent and coherent reptation. In the region of incoherent reptation, when τe < t < τR, the decay of gtbDt can be approximated by the following expression:

(20)

On the other hand, in the region of coherent reptation, when τR < t < τd, the decay of gtbDt can be described as

(21)

The first terms on the right-hand side of expressions (20) and (21) are connected with central segments, and the second terms represent the end effects.

For the experimental part of this study, perdeuterated polyethylene oxide of different molar masses (see Table I) was purchased from Polymer Standards Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany. The PEO samples were placed in 3 mm outer diameter NMR tubes, covered with argon, and flame sealed. The transverse relaxation decay of the deuterons was measured with a Bruker Avance III NMR spectrometer operating at a 2H resonance frequency of 46.1 MHz equipped with a solid state probe head, using a Hahn echo pulse sequence (90°x − τ – 180°x − τ) with appropriate phase cycling. The duration of the π-pulse, typically 10 µs, was twice the length of the π/2-pulse. The measurements were carried out in completely molten state of the polymers at different temperatures between the melting point (see Table I) and 373 K. The longitudinal relaxation time T1 increases for all samples with temperature, i.e., from roughly 40 ms (Tm) to about 100 ms (373 K). A recycle delay of 5 T1 was applied between the repetitions of the pulse sequence to allow for a complete spin–lattice relaxation. Starting from the end of the second waiting time τ, the second half of the spin-echo was acquired. The transverse relaxation decay is then given by the evolution of the PEO echo intensity at time t = 2τ + tπ. The measurements were repeated up to five times, normalized to their maximum, and then averaged (for details, see Ref. 37).

TABLE I.

Sample overview. Samples, as well as molecular weight and polydispersity index data, were provided by Polymer Standards Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany. The melting temperatures Tm were determined by dynamic scanning calorimetry using a Perkin Elmer DSC 6000 instrument. The specified melting temperatures correspond to the peak temperature in the second heating run at 1 K/min (for details, see Ref. 37).

Tm (°C)Mw (g/mol)Mp (g/mol)Mn (g/mol)PDI
PEO-d4 300k 56.0 310 000 289 000 242 000 1.28 
PEO-d4 75k 57.6 74 100 79 500 61 000 1.21 
PEO-d4 33k 55.7 34 400 34 700 31 300 1.10 
PEO-d4 3.5k 48.4 3 410 3 600 3 080 1.11 
Tm (°C)Mw (g/mol)Mp (g/mol)Mn (g/mol)PDI
PEO-d4 300k 56.0 310 000 289 000 242 000 1.28 
PEO-d4 75k 57.6 74 100 79 500 61 000 1.21 
PEO-d4 33k 55.7 34 400 34 700 31 300 1.10 
PEO-d4 3.5k 48.4 3 410 3 600 3 080 1.11 

In the following, the relevant time scales (τs, τe, τR, and τd) are estimated, before the experimental results are being discussed in the context of the presented theory. The segmental relaxation time can be estimated by using the entanglement molecular mass Me = 1730 g/mol,38 the center of mass diffusion for the reference molecular weight Dcm12.3k=3×1013m2/s,39 the Kuhn length b=11Å, and the molecular mass of a Kuhn segment mk = 137 g/mol25 as follows:

(22)

with Ne = Me/mk ≅ 12.6 and Ncm = Mcm/mk ≅ 89.8. Correspondingly, the entanglement time is estimated as follows:

(23)

From this, we can now estimate the Rouse relaxation and tube disengagement times for the investigated molecular weights according to τR = τsN2 = τeZ2 and τd = 3τeZ3.

By comparing τd with T2eff in Table II, it is obvious that the samples PEO-d4 3.5k and PEO-d4 33k satisfy the conditions of the Redfield limit T2effτd, while PEO-d4 75k is in the crossover region T2effτd, and the sample with the largest molecular mass PEO-d4 300k is beyond the Redfield limit T2effτd. For this molecular mass, the Rouse relaxation time is in the order of T2eff, and therefore most of the experimental time scale lies in the region of coherent reptation, i.e., in region III, as one can see on the left side of Fig. 1. In contrast, for the samples with a lower molecular mass, T2effτd so that most of the experimental time scale lies in region IV.

TABLE II.

Number of entanglements per chain, Rouse relaxation time, and tube disengagement time of our samples based on the number average molecular mass Mn. The comparison of τd with the experimental T2eff shows the validity of the Redfield limit for the corresponding sample. Since the literature values in Refs. 38 and 39, and thus the calculated times, are given for 353 K, we show our results for 358 K to ensure the maximum possible comparability.

ZτR (s)τd (s)T2eff(358 K) (s)
PEO-d4 300k 140 2.2 × 10−4 9.3 × 10−2 8.8 × 10−4 
PEO-d4 75k 35 1.4 × 10−5 1.5 × 10−3 2.2 × 10−3 
PEO-d4 33k 18 3.7 × 10−6 2.0 × 10−4 7.0 × 10−3 
PEO-d4 3.5k 4.5 × 10−8 2.7 × 10−7 5.6 × 10−2 
ZτR (s)τd (s)T2eff(358 K) (s)
PEO-d4 300k 140 2.2 × 10−4 9.3 × 10−2 8.8 × 10−4 
PEO-d4 75k 35 1.4 × 10−5 1.5 × 10−3 2.2 × 10−3 
PEO-d4 33k 18 3.7 × 10−6 2.0 × 10−4 7.0 × 10−3 
PEO-d4 3.5k 4.5 × 10−8 2.7 × 10−7 5.6 × 10−2 
FIG. 1.

(a) Hahn echo decay for PEO-d4 300k at four temperatures between 328 K and 378 K. Most of the investigated time scale lies between the estimated τR and τd (dashed lines), i.e., within region III. The experimental T2eff increases with temperature, while the shape of the decay remains unchanged. (b) Temperature dependence of T2eff in form of the negative logarithm of T2eff normalized to 373 K over the inverse temperature. In this representation, the activation energy Ea/kB results directly from the slope of the regression line. A significant difference is observed between 300k and the other molar masses. The activation energy for each sample is listed in Table III.

FIG. 1.

(a) Hahn echo decay for PEO-d4 300k at four temperatures between 328 K and 378 K. Most of the investigated time scale lies between the estimated τR and τd (dashed lines), i.e., within region III. The experimental T2eff increases with temperature, while the shape of the decay remains unchanged. (b) Temperature dependence of T2eff in form of the negative logarithm of T2eff normalized to 373 K over the inverse temperature. In this representation, the activation energy Ea/kB results directly from the slope of the regression line. A significant difference is observed between 300k and the other molar masses. The activation energy for each sample is listed in Table III.

Close modal

From expression (7), consequently, the temperature dependence of T2eff is determined by the temperature dependence of the segmental relaxation time τs1, which also defines the temperature dependence of the self-diffusion coefficient. In the regions of incoherent and coherent reptation, the temperature dependence of T2eff is expected to be weaker, following τs1/7 and τs1/3, as can be seen in expressions (17) and (19), respectively.

Indeed, the experimental results seem to support these assumptions, as can be seen in Fig. 1(b) and Table III. The activation energies obtained from T2eff for the three lowest molecular masses (3.5k, 33k, and 75k) are close to each other and in agreement with results of rheological measurements [Ea(10k)/kB = 3020 K].40 For the largest molecular mass (300k), the effective activation energy is significantly smaller. At least in a semi-quantitatively approach, this is in accordance with tube-reptation predictions for region III, i.e., coherent reptation.

TABLE III.

Experimental effective spin–spin relaxation time T2eff, i.e., the time needed for the signal to decay from the initial normalization 1 to 1/e and resulting activation energies Ea/kB.

PEO-d4 300kPEO-d4 75kPEO-d4 33kPEO-d4 3.5k
T2eff373 K(s) 1.02 × 10−3 3.1 × 10−3 9.8 × 10−3 7.8 × 10−2 
T2eff358 K(s) 8.8 × 10−4 2.2 × 10−3 7.0 × 10−3 5.6 × 10−2 
T2eff343 K(s) 7.5 × 10−4 1.6 × 10−3 5.3 × 10−3 4.0 × 10−2 
T2eff333 K(s)  1.3 × 10−3   
T2eff328 K(s) 6.3 × 10−4  3.9 × 10−3 2.6 × 10−2 
Ea/kB (K) 1311 ± 2 2700 ± 100 2480 ± 120 2970 ± 70 
PEO-d4 300kPEO-d4 75kPEO-d4 33kPEO-d4 3.5k
T2eff373 K(s) 1.02 × 10−3 3.1 × 10−3 9.8 × 10−3 7.8 × 10−2 
T2eff358 K(s) 8.8 × 10−4 2.2 × 10−3 7.0 × 10−3 5.6 × 10−2 
T2eff343 K(s) 7.5 × 10−4 1.6 × 10−3 5.3 × 10−3 4.0 × 10−2 
T2eff333 K(s)  1.3 × 10−3   
T2eff328 K(s) 6.3 × 10−4  3.9 × 10−3 2.6 × 10−2 
Ea/kB (K) 1311 ± 2 2700 ± 100 2480 ± 120 2970 ± 70 

In the following, the theoretical predictions of the Hahn echo decays will be compared to the experimental results at 358 K, since the shape of the decay remains unchanged in the investigated temperature regime and the used literature values are mainly valid for 353 K, assuming that the reptation model without the effects of contour length fluctuations adequately describes the real chain motions in polymer melts. Let us first investigate the 2H NMR response considering the lowest molecular masses of 3.5k and 33k. Both situations are within the validity of the Redfield limit. The measured spin–spin relaxation rates can be represented as the sum of contributions from the fast fluctuating Rouse modes inside the tube and slow fluctuating reptation modes connected with diffusion inside tubes,

(24)

where R2 are the experimentally measured effective spin–spin relaxation rates of samples with the molecular weights Mi. The Rouse relaxation time depends only weakly on the molecular mass [see expression (6)], and therefore, it seems reasonable to accept as a first estimation R2RouseM1=R2RouseM2. The contributions of reptation modes can be estimated using expression (10), where the values of two different molecular masses are related as follows:

(25)

Using expressions (24) and (25) in combination with the experimentally measured values for M1 = 3.5k and M2 = 33k at 358K (see Tables II and III), we can estimate the reptation contribution for PEO-d4 3.5k as

(26)

Thus, the HE decay of 3.5k is dominated by the Rouse modes 90.2%. We can now estimate β2 by dividing expression (7) by expression (10),

(27)

Using R2RouseM1=0.902R2M1 and N1 = Mn(3.5k)/mk, one finds β2 ≈ 1/40.

One possible explanation for this rather small value of β may be related to the primitive chain conformation. It is very well known that long-wavelength properties of sufficiently long ideal chains are equivalent to each other.23–27 This means that it is irrespective of the model, i.e., freely jointed chain of Kuhn, Gaussian chain, worm-like chain (persistent chain or Kratky–Porod chain41), or some other is being used for describing them. However, the situation may turn out to be different if one addresses short-wavelength properties that depend on the structure of the chain segment. The discussed parameter β connected with the residual part of quadrupole interactions of deuterium spins [see expression (9)] seems to belong to these short-wavelength properties.

In the standard formulation of the tube-reptation model,23–27 the primitive path and the primitive chain are considered either as a freely jointed chain consisting of Z Kuhn segments of length a=bNe1/2 or as a Gaussian chain for discussing the effects connected with contour length fluctuations. The primitive path is, by definition, the line around which the fast Rouse-like motions of polymer segments are being performed at a distance about the tube diameter a=bNe1/2. This constitutes a very complex dynamical object of intermolecular entanglements formed during a time interval τe=τsNe2. Therefore, it seems more realistic to consider it as a continuous line slowly changing in direction. The worm-like ideal chain (or persistent, Kratky–Porod chain24,41,42) should be more realistic for a description of the primitive path.

For the worm-like chains, as it is very well known,24,41,42 the square of the Flory radius RF2 is connected with the persistent chain length lp and the extended length of the chain L by the following relation:

(28)

From this relation, consequently, the length of the Kuhn segment for the worm-like chain equals

(29)

If the length of the worm-like chain is large, Llp, then the Kuhn segment is connected by simple relation with the persistence length as follows:

(30)

However, there exists an important difference between the freely jointed chain with Kuhn segments of length bp and the worm-like chain with the same length of the Kuhn segment. A freely jointed chain consists of rectilinear segments with length bp = 2lp, while the worm-like chain is curved on each of its points. As a result, the length of the Kuhn segment in space and along the segment are identical, while the Kuhn segment in the case of the worm-like chain is an effective quantity where the separation of the segment in space and along the segment differs (see Fig. 2). If we consider two points of a worm-like chain separated in space by the distance bp = 2lp, the separation of the points along the chain s in comparison with the freely jointed chain and in accordance with relation (28) would satisfy the following equation:

(31)
FIG. 2.

Illustration of the differences between the worm-like (wl, dashed line) and freely jointed (fj, solid line) chains regarding the length of the Kuhn segment for two points separated in space by bp = 2lp and the orientation of the tangent vectors u1x1 and u2(x2) at two positions x1 and x2, respectively.

FIG. 2.

Illustration of the differences between the worm-like (wl, dashed line) and freely jointed (fj, solid line) chains regarding the length of the Kuhn segment for two points separated in space by bp = 2lp and the orientation of the tangent vectors u1x1 and u2(x2) at two positions x1 and x2, respectively.

Close modal

This transcendental equation can be solved numerically with respect to swl and results in swl ≅ 2.9475lp ≈ 3lp. For two points inside the worm-like chain at positions x1 and x2, the corresponding tangent vectors u(x1) and u(x2) are not parallel to each other (see Fig. 2), and the average cosine of the angle between them can be calculated in the following way:

(32)

Let us assume a case where the primitive path is the freely jointed chain consisting of Z = N/Ne Kuhn segments, where N is the number of segments inside the real tagged polymer chain and Ne is the number of Kuhn segments between two entanglements. The vectors connecting the ends of the primitive segments are denoted as ak with k = 1, 2, …, Z. Consider a situation when the segment of the tagged chain with number m is located somewhere in the vicinity of the primitive segment with number k. In this case, a residual part of the projection of the vector connecting the ends of the mth segment of the tagged chain on the vector ak does not depend on the position inside the kth primitive segment where it is located because the latter is a straight line. The situation is different for the case when the primitive path has the structure of a worm-like chain because its segments are curved. Therefore, this situation will lead to the appearance of an additional numerical factor given by expression (32). The Hamiltonian of deuteron quadrupole interactions depends quadratically with respect to the relative variables connected with segment orientation (it is an irreducible tensor of the second order relatively angle variables of the Kuhn segment), and therefore expression (9) can be rewritten as

(33)

where the numerical factor β̃ is retained to account for possible additional factors.

The effective spin relaxation rate, as it is possible to see from expression (10) in the Redfield limit, is proportional to ω̃Q2=β̃2cosθ124ωQ2Ne2, where cosθ1241/22 is comparable to the value estimated from the experimental data β2 ≈ 1/40.

In the following, we attempt a comparison between the experimentally observed HE decays of deuterated PEO melts (3.5k, 33k, 75k, and 300k) and the decays predicted by the discussed theory using expressions (1)(15) for an extended time interval t10T2eff, as presented in Figs. 37.

FIG. 3.

Double logarithm of the normalized Hahn echo signal loglngexpDt as a function of the logarithm of the normalized time logt/T2eff. The slopes of the linear fit (solid lines) in the short- and long-time regions yield the exponents of the pseudo-Gaussian and stretched exponential decays. The estimated Rouse and tube disengagement times corresponding to 358 K are marked with dashed lines.

FIG. 3.

Double logarithm of the normalized Hahn echo signal loglngexpDt as a function of the logarithm of the normalized time logt/T2eff. The slopes of the linear fit (solid lines) in the short- and long-time regions yield the exponents of the pseudo-Gaussian and stretched exponential decays. The estimated Rouse and tube disengagement times corresponding to 358 K are marked with dashed lines.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 3.5k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for non-entangled polymer melts (line) according to expression (6) using the corresponding numbers from Table II and ωQ = 230 000 s−1. Note that the Rouse relaxation time τR ≈ 4.5 × 10−8 s and the tube disengagement time τd ≈ 2.7 × 10−7 s for this molar mass are essentially smaller than the presented time window.

FIG. 4.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 3.5k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for non-entangled polymer melts (line) according to expression (6) using the corresponding numbers from Table II and ωQ = 230 000 s−1. Note that the Rouse relaxation time τR ≈ 4.5 × 10−8 s and the tube disengagement time τd ≈ 2.7 × 10−7 s for this molar mass are essentially smaller than the presented time window.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 33k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for entangled polymers inside the Redfield limit (line) according to expression (3) with expression (4) for gfastD and expression (12) for gtbD. T2fast would be ideally determined in a sample with M < Me; however, the sample 3.5k is close to the limit of entanglements (M ≈ 2Me) and can, therefore, be used as lower limit for T2fast, so that T2fast=T2eff3.5k=56ms. For gtbD, the corresponding numbers from Table II were used with ω̃Q=3300 s1. The estimated tube disengagement time is depicted by the dashed line. Note that the Rouse relaxation time τR ≈ 3.7 × 10−6 s for this molecular mass is essentially smaller than the presented time window.

FIG. 5.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 33k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for entangled polymers inside the Redfield limit (line) according to expression (3) with expression (4) for gfastD and expression (12) for gtbD. T2fast would be ideally determined in a sample with M < Me; however, the sample 3.5k is close to the limit of entanglements (M ≈ 2Me) and can, therefore, be used as lower limit for T2fast, so that T2fast=T2eff3.5k=56ms. For gtbD, the corresponding numbers from Table II were used with ω̃Q=3300 s1. The estimated tube disengagement time is depicted by the dashed line. Note that the Rouse relaxation time τR ≈ 3.7 × 10−6 s for this molecular mass is essentially smaller than the presented time window.

Close modal
FIG. 6.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 75k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for entangled polymers inside the Redfield limit (line) according to expression (3) with expression (4) for gfastD and expression (12) for gtbD, using T2fast=56ms, ω̃Q=4200 s1, and the values from Table II. The estimated Rouse and tube disengagement times are depicted by dashed lines.

FIG. 6.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 75k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for entangled polymers inside the Redfield limit (line) according to expression (3) with expression (4) for gfastD and expression (12) for gtbD, using T2fast=56ms, ω̃Q=4200 s1, and the values from Table II. The estimated Rouse and tube disengagement times are depicted by dashed lines.

Close modal
FIG. 7.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 300k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for entangled polymers outside the Redfield limit (line) according to expression (3) with expression (4) for gfastD and expression (13) in combination with expressions (1), (14), and (15) for gtbD, using T2fast=56ms, ω̃Q=11200 s1, and the values from Table II. The estimated Rouse and tube disengagement times are depicted by dashed lines.

FIG. 7.

Deuteron Hahn echo decay of PEO-d4 300k at 358K (circles) in comparison with the calculated decay for entangled polymers outside the Redfield limit (line) according to expression (3) with expression (4) for gfastD and expression (13) in combination with expressions (1), (14), and (15) for gtbD, using T2fast=56ms, ω̃Q=11200 s1, and the values from Table II. The estimated Rouse and tube disengagement times are depicted by dashed lines.

Close modal

One can see a qualitative correspondence between the predictions of the reptation model and the experimentally observed 2H HE decay, consisting of a strong attenuation of the initial decay at times exceeding T2eff. This attenuation reflects both the frequency nature of the end effect and the reptation movements of the polymer chains within the tubes created by entanglements.

This qualitative agreement is displayed in Fig. 3, which shows the time dependence of the Hahn echo signal measured in units of the experimentally determined effective spin relaxation time T2eff in double logarithmic coordinates for the PEO-d4 300k melt at different temperatures. The time interval under discussion corresponds to the coherent reptation region, i.e., regime III. Experimentally, we observe a transition from a pseudo-Gaussian decay at short times with an effective exponent of 1.34 to a stretched exponential decay with an exponent of 0.26. This compares to a transition from pseudo-Gaussian behavior given by expression (18) with the exponent 1.5 at short times to the nearly (i.e., with accuracy of logarithmic corrections) stretched exponential decay given by expression (21) at longer times. The observed stretched exponent 0.26 corresponds to the second term in the right-hand side of expression (21) reflecting the frequency nature of the end effects.

As already mentioned, PEO-d4 3.5k and 33k satisfy the Redfield limit, 75k is in the crossover region, and 300k is beyond the Redfield limit. Furthermore, 3.5k has a molecular mass of about twice Me. Therefore, for quantitative comparison, we attempt to describe 3.5k with expression (6), 33k and 75k with expression (12), and 300k with expression (13) in combination with expressions (1), (14), and (15).

In Fig. 4, one can see the Hahn echo decay of the PEO-d4 3.5k melt. Despite the fact that the discussed molecular weight is approximately twice as large as Ne and we are dealing at least with a weakly meshed melt, the echo signal decay is well described by expression (6), derived for the Rouse model taking into account the dynamical heterogeneity of polymer segments connected with the end-effects. This is in agreement with the previously estimated contributions of 90.2% Rouse and 9.8% reptation modes.

In Figs. 57, we present our attempts to match the experimentally observed HE decays for PEO-d4 33k, 75k, and 300k at 358K with the decays described by expressions (1) and (12)(15) derived from the tube-reptation model. One can see that a more or less satisfactory description is achieved only in the initial part of the attenuation. At longer times, the tube-reptation model predicts a faster decay than is actually observed experimentally. This reflects an overestimation by the tube-reptation model of anisotropic reptation modes, i.e., by strong correlations of segment spatial displacements with the initial polymer chain conformation, and a corresponding underestimation of isotropic fluctuations of the remaining modes of motion, as is postulated by the Renormalized Rouse models (see details in review articles2,6,43).

This can also be seen in Fig. 8, where the experimentally observed molecular mass dependence of T2eff is illustrated. A nearly linear dependence on molecular mass 1/T2effZ=N/Ne is observed, while from expression (10), a quadratic dependence 1/T̃2effZ2 is expected for situations where the Redfield limit is met and a dependence of 1/T̃2effZ1/3 for situations outside that limit, according to expression (19).

FIG. 8.

Dependence of the normalized experimental T2eff on Z = Mn/Me. For comparison, a dependence on Z−1 is shown as solid line.

FIG. 8.

Dependence of the normalized experimental T2eff on Z = Mn/Me. For comparison, a dependence on Z−1 is shown as solid line.

Close modal

Here, however, the difference between T̃2eff and T2eff needs to be noted. The first one is defined by expression (10), which is actually the initial decay rate of the HE. The second one is defined by the equation gDT2eff=1/e. In our cases, when the conditions of the Redfield limit are satisfied, this equation can be read as

(34)

In the limit Z, the equality T2eff=T̃2eff will hold; however, for small Z, both quantities will have a different dependence on molecular mass. The described situation can partially be mitigated by a small value of the numerical factor β in expression (9). To our knowledge, this point has not yet been investigated necessarily but could at least partially explain the aforementioned discrepancy in the future.

In this paper, we have focused on the detailed discussion of the most popular dynamic model of reptations, which is phenomenological in nature. In addition, there are microscopic approaches based on the Zwanzig-Mori memory matrix formalism developed initially in the works of Schweizer44–46 and extended by Kimmich and Fatkullin as a variant related to the renormalized Rouse formalism.2,47–50 This approach is based on the pre-averaging approximation in the derivation of the equations of motion of the polymer chain, which absolutely exclude anisotropic reptation motions along the primitive tube. The preliminary calculations based on the thrice renormalized Rouse model show better agreement with our experimental results for the molar masses up to 75k, for which the Anderson–Weiss approximation can be used. Further theoretical and experimental research, and mutual comparison are required to improve the understanding of long-chain polymer dynamics.

The phenomenological tube-reptation model is formulated for the limit of infinitely long polymer chains. In melts of macromolecules for experimentally accessible finite molecular masses, contributions from non-reptational modes of motion to experimentally observed physical quantities, whose behavior differs significantly from the predictions of the reptation model, turn out to be important. Systematic studies of the dynamics of the spin echo signal decay of deuterium nuclei in polymer melts of various molecular masses over long time intervals, significantly longer than the effective spin–spin relaxation time, and comparison with corresponding decays from proton spins in undeuterated polymer melts, contains unique and new information on the molecular mechanisms of the intermolecular entanglement formation process. In our opinion, this is still a poorly understood fundamental process of entanglement formation that can be investigated by thorough NMR transverse relaxation studies in polymer melts with molecular masses of 50–100 kDa, for which the Anderson–Weiss approximation should be correct, and will make the interpretation of the experimental data more reliable in order to allow for refinements of the current reptation models.

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under research Grant No. STA 511/13-2. They also acknowledge financial support for the publication from the Open Access Publication Fund of the Technische Universität Ilmenau. The authors thank Kerstin Geyer for assistance with the DSC measurements.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Figshare at http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19762933, reference number [37].

1.
J. P.
Cohen-Addad
,
Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.
25
,
1
(
1993
).
2.
R.
Kimmich
and
N.
Fatkullin
,
Adv. Polym. Sci.
170
,
1
(
2004
).
3.
K.
Saalwächter
,
Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.
51
,
1
(
2007
).
4.
J.
Kowalewski
,
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
(
RSC Publishing
,
2011
), Vol. 40, p.
205
.
5.
D.
Kruk
,
A.
Herrmann
, and
E. A.
Rössler
,
Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.
63
,
33
(
2012
).
6.
R.
Kimmich
and
N.
Fatkullin
,
Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.
101
,
18
(
2017
).
7.
J. P.
Cohen-Addad
,
J. Chem. Phys.
60
,
2440
(
1974
).
8.
V. D.
Fedotov
,
V. M.
Chernov
, and
T. N.
Khazanovich
,
Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R.
20
,
1037
(
1978
).
9.
J. P.
Cohen-Addad
and
R.
Dupeyre
,
Polymer
24
,
400
(
1983
).
10.
T. P.
Kulagina
,
V. V.
Marchenkov
, and
B. N.
Provotorov
,
Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R.
31
,
420
(
1989
).
11.
M. G.
Brereton
,
Macromolecules
22
,
3667
(
1989
).
12.
M. G.
Brereton
,
Macromolecules
23
,
1119
(
1990
).
13.
V. M.
Chernov
and
G. S.
Krasnopol’skii
,
J. Exp. Theor. Phys.
107
,
302
(
2008
).
14.
V. M.
Chernov
and
A. V.
Butakov
,
Polym. Sci., Ser. A
53
,
204
(
2011
).
15.
C. P.
Slichter
,
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
, 3rd ed. (
Springer
,
Berlin
,
1992
).
16.
D.
Wolf
,
Spin-Temperature and Nuclear-Spin Relaxation in Matter
(
Oxford Clarendon Press
,
1979
).
17.
M.
Mehring
,
Principles of High Resolution NMR in Solids
, 2nd ed. (
Springer
,
Berlin
,
1983
).
18.
R.
Kimmich
,
NMR Tomography, Diffusometry, Relaxometry
(
Springer
,
Berlin
,
1997
).
19.
A.
Abragam
,
The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism
(
Oxford Clarendon Press
,
1961
).
20.
N. F.
Fatkullin
,
T.
Körber
, and
E. A.
Rössler
,
Polymer
142
,
310
(
2018
).
21.
I. K.
Ostrovskaya
and
N. F.
Fatkullin
,
Polym. Sci., Ser. A
62
,
132
(
2020
).
22.
I. K.
Ostrovskaya
,
N. F.
Fatkullin
,
T.
Körber
,
E. A.
Rössler
,
A.
Lozovoi
,
C.
Mattea
, and
S.
Stapf
,
J. Chem. Phys.
152
,
184904
(
2020
).
23.
M.
Doi
and
S. F.
Edwards
,
The Theory of Polymer Dynamics
(
Oxford Clarendon Press
,
1989
).
24.
A. Y.
Grosberg
and
A. R.
Khokhlov
,
Statistical Physics of Macromolecules
(
AIP Press
,
1994
).
25.
M.
Rubinstein
and
R. H.
Colby
,
Polymer Physics
(
Oxford University Press
,
2003
).
26.
P. G.
de Gennes
,
Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics
(
Cornell University Press
,
Ithaka
,
1979
).
27.
G. R.
Strobl
,
The Physics of Polymers
(
Springer
,
1997
).
28.
N.
Fatkullin
and
R.
Kimmich
,
Phys. Rev. E
52
,
3273
(
1995
).
29.
R. C.
Ball
,
P. T.
Callaghan
, and
E. T.
Samulski
,
J. Chem. Phys.
106
,
7352
(
1997
).
30.
T. N.
Khazanovich
,
Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R.
4
,
727
(
1963
).
31.
R.
Ullman
,
J. Chem. Phys.
43
,
3161
(
1965
).
32.
D. A.
Markelov
,
M.
Dolgushev
, and
E.
Lähderanta
,
Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy
, 1st ed. (
Academic Press
,
2017
), Vol. 91, Chap. I, p.
1
.
33.
M.
Dolgushev
,
D. A.
Markelov
,
F.
Fürstenberg
, and
T.
Guérin
,
Phys. Rev. E
94
,
012502
(
2016
).
34.
D. A.
Markelov
,
F.
Fürstenberg
, and
M.
Dolgushev
,
Polymer
144
,
65
(
2018
).
35.
E. M.
Pestryaev
,
Polym. Sci., Ser. A
62
,
766
(
2020
).
36.
E. M.
Pestryaev
,
Polym. Sci., Ser. A
61
,
392
(
2019
).
37.
K.
Lindt
,
C.
Mattea
, and
S.
Stapf
(
2022
). “NMR Hahn echo decays in deuterated polyethylene oxide melts,” Figshare, Dataset .
38.
L. J.
Fetters
,
D. J.
Lohse
, and
R. H.
Colby
,
Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook
, 2nd ed. (
Springer
,
New York
,
2007
), Chap. XXV, p.
447
.
39.
E.
Fischer
,
R.
Kimmich
,
U.
Beginn
,
M.
Möller
, and
N.
Fatkullin
,
Phys. Rev. E
59
,
4079
(
1999
).
40.
D. G.
Tsalikis
,
T.
Koukoulas
,
V. G.
Mavrantzas
,
R.
Pasquino
,
D.
Vlassopoulos
,
W.
Pyckhout-Hintzen
,
A.
Wischnewski
,
M.
Monkenbusch
, and
D.
Richter
,
Macromolecules
50
,
2565
(
2017
).
41.
O.
Kratky
and
G.
Porod
,
Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
68
,
1106
(
1949
).
42.
H.
Yamakava
,
Modern Theory of Polymer Solutions
(
Harper & Row
,
New York
,
1974
).
43.
E. A.
Rössler
,
S.
Stapf
, and
N.
Fatkullin
,
Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.
18
,
173
(
2013
).
44.
K. S.
Schweizer
,
J. Chem. Phys.
91
,
5802
(
1989
).
45.
K. S.
Schweizer
,
J. Chem. Phys.
91
,
5822
(
1989
).
46.
K. S.
Schweizer
,
M.
Fuchs
,
G.
Szamel
,
M.
Guenza
, and
H.
Tang
,
Macromol. Theory Simul.
6
,
1037
(
1997
).
47.
N.
Fatkullin
and
R.
Kimmich
,
J. Chem. Phys.
101
,
822
(
1994
).
48.
R.
Kimmich
,
N.
Fatkullin
,
H. W.
Weber
, and
S.
Stapf
,
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
172
,
689
(
1994
).
49.
M. A.
Krutyeva
,
N. F.
Fatkullin
, and
R.
Kimmich
,
Polym. Sci., Ser. A
47
,
1022
(
2005
).
50.
N.
Fatkullin
,
A.
Gubaidullin
,
C.
Mattea
, and
S.
Stapf
,
J. Chem. Phys.
137
,
224907
(
2012
).