In a space laser communication system with a few-mode fiber as the receiving terminal, the influence of random angular jitter on the communication performance cannot be ignored. Therefore, it is necessary to research the coupling characteristics of the space laser–FMF system with random angular jitter. A space laser–FMF coupling model with random angular jitter is proposed based on the Laguerre–Gaussian mode. The coupling efficiency and bit error rate (BER) of the communication system are optimized by the relative aperture of the coupling lens. When the relative aperture is 0.15, the standard deviation of random jitter is 3, the signal-to-noise ratio is 5, the coupling efficiency after optimization is improved by 29%, and the BER is reduced by 46%. In this case, the maximum BER reduction after optimization is 55%. The research shows that in the presence of random angular jitter, adjusting the relative aperture can significantly optimize the coupling efficiency and the BER of the space laser–FMF coupling system. The ability of the relative aperture to optimize the coupling efficiency increases with random jitter standard deviation, which exhibits an upper limit for the optimization of the BER.

Space laser communication has become a research hotspot due to its many advantages, such its large amount of data transfer, fast speed, and flexible form. In space laser communication systems using optical fibers as receivers, the prevalence of the few-mode fiber (FMF) is gradually increasing. The FMF provides more light-guiding modes than the single-mode fiber (SMF), and the coupling efficiency with space lasers is higher.1–4 The mode number of the FMF is less than that of the multi-mode fiber (MMF), and the laser is less affected by mode dispersion during the propagation of the FMF.5–8 In the space laser–FMF coupled system, random angular jitter is a factor that cannot be ignored. Random angular jitter refers to the variation in the deviation angle between the receiving optical axis and the incident beam.9,10 Its existence will reduce the coupling efficiency of the space laser and FMF and increase the bit error rate (BER) of the communication system. The efficient coupling between space laser and FMF is the focus of space laser communication systems.

Wang et al. proved experimentally that the coupling efficiency of the FMF and space laser is 12.1% higher than that of the SMF when the random angular jitter is 5 µm.11 Therefore, the coupling efficiency can be improved by using the FMF as the receiver in the space laser communication system. Guang et al. analyzed the coupling efficiencies of ultrafast laser pulses with different wavelengths, durations, incident angles, positions, beam spot sizes, and curvature radii with different LP modes of FMFs.12,13 These studies can provide a reference for calculating the coupling efficiency of the FMF under different operating conditions. Fardoost et al. constructed a coupling model of the Laguerre–Gaussian mode space laser and the FMF.14 The simulation results show that the optimal normalized frequency under ideal conditions was 4.94 and the maximum total coupling efficiency exceeded 99%. The Laguerre–Gaussian coupling model was discussed in detail, but the loss of coupling efficiency caused by the coupling environment was not considered when calculating the coupling efficiency. Fan et al. researched a coupling efficiency model of a space laser–FMF system in the presence of atmospheric turbulence and random angular jitter.15 They used the ratio of the coupling lens radius to the fiber core radius as an optimization parameter, and its values were obtained based on the LP01 mode. Based on this method, when the normalized jitter value was 0.4, the maximum coupling efficiency simulation value was about 0.65. The method of obtaining the optimization parameter based on the LP01 mode can simplify the calculation, but it ignores the contribution of other modes in the FMF to the coupling efficiency. Therefore, further research is needed to improve the coupling model and communication performance of the space laser–FMF system with random angle jitter through new optimization methods.

The atmosphere has an absorption effect on space lasers, which is weak only at specific wavelengths, such as 800, 1060, and 1550 nm. Therefore, these communication wavelengths are often selected for space laser communication systems. The fiber core diameter cannot reflect all the characteristics of the FMF. The normalized frequency of the fiber is an important parameter to determine the usable mode number of the FMF. Based on the above-mentioned reasons, using the laser wavelength or fiber core diameter as the optimization parameter of space laser–FMF coupling systems is not very applicable in practical engineering. When designing such systems, the space laser wavelength and fiber parameters are usually determined first, and then the coupling lens is designed. Selecting the relative aperture of the coupling lens as the optimization parameter can leave more selectivity for the FMF and the space laser, which not only conforms to engineering practices but also makes the design of the coupling system more flexible. However, research on optimizing the space laser–FMF coupling efficiency based on the relative aperture of the coupling lens is still lacking. Therefore, it is necessary to deeply analyze the optimization effect of the relative aperture of the coupling lens on the coupling efficiency and BER of the space laser–FMF communication system.

This paper constructs a space laser–FMF coupling model to analyze the relationship between the space laser–FMF coupling efficiency and the relative aperture of the coupling lens in the presence of random angular jitter. The enhancement of the communication performance by the optimal relative aperture of the coupling lens is investigated. The study assumes that the space laser–FMF coupling is in a non-turbulent atmosphere, and the influence of atmospheric turbulence on coupling efficiency is not considered. The communication distance is between 20 and 100 km, and a space laser participating in coupling is regarded as a Gaussian beam. In the case of not using the mode-division multiplexing communication method, the study ignores the inter-mode crosstalk of the FMF. The FMF is assumed to be a weakly guiding step-index fiber to simplify the calculation. This research is helpful to improve the communication performance of the space laser–FMF system in the presence of random jitter, and the optimization results can be used as a reference for the design of the coupling lens.

This paper is organized as follows: Sec. II presents the theoretical formulation. Section III provides the numerical results and discussions. Section IV concludes the paper.

The space laser–FMF communication system can be simplified to a coupling model consisting of a space laser, a coupling lens, and an FMF. When analyzing the influence of the coupling lens on the coupling efficiency, the coupling lens can be equivalent to a thin lens with a focal length of f and a diameter of D. The space laser–FMF coupling model is shown in Fig. 1.

FIG. 1.

Space laser–FMF coupling model.

FIG. 1.

Space laser–FMF coupling model.

Close modal

As shown in Fig. 1, plane A is the entrance pupil plane of the coupling lens, plane B is the focal plane of the coupling lens, and the end face of the FMF is located at the focal plane of the coupling lens. The space laser incident on plane A is condensed to plane B through the coupling lens and coupled with the FMF.

The coupling efficiency of the FMF is defined as the ratio of the light energy coupled into the FMF to the available light energy. According to Parseval’s theorem, it is equivalent to calculate the coupling efficiency in either plane A or plane B.16,17 Instead of calculating the space laser–FMF coupling efficiency at plane A,15 we calculate it at plane B, where we only need to calculate the optical field distribution of the laser in the focal plane once, whereas plane A requires calculating the mode field distribution of all modes of the FMF at the entrance pupil plane. Thus, it is simpler to calculate the coupling efficiency at plane B.

After the space laser passes through the lens, its optical field distribution at focal plane B can be expressed as18 

EBr=expikf+r22fπD24λf,
(1)

where λ is the laser wavelength, k is the wavenumber k = 2π/λ, and J1 is the Bessel function of the first kind of order 1. The phasor actor expikf+r2/2f can be ignored when performing intensity calculations. The optical field distribution of the laser at plane B can be rewritten as

EBr=πD24λf2J1kDr/2fkDr/2f.
(2)

Ignoring the polarization mode coupling component, the mode field distribution of the weakly guided step-index FMF can be approximated by a Laguerre–Gaussian distribution, and the normalized expression of the linearly polarized LP mode field of the FMF can be expressed as19,20

Fm,lr=Cm,lrωlLmlr2ω2expr22ω2sinlφcoslφ,
(3)

where m and l are the axial and angular coordinates of the mode field, respectively, Cm,l is the normalization constant for the light fields, Lml is a Laguerre polynomial, sin  and cos  correspond to the two forms of the simplex mode, and ω is the relative radius parameter, ω=r0/kNA., where r0 is the core radius of the FMF and N.A. is the numerical aperture of the fiber.

The coupling efficiency of the j-th order mode in an FMF is the overlap integral of the mode field of this mode and the space laser, which can be expressed as21 

ηj=BEB*rFjrdr2BEBr2Fjr2dr,
(4)

where EB*r is the complex conjugate of the light field of the space laser in plane B, Fjr is the normalized fiber mode field of the j-th order mode, and BFjr2dr=1. Equation (4) is rewritten as

ηj=BEB*rFjrdr2BEBr2dr.
(5)

In the case of ignoring the crosstalk between n modes, the coupling between space laser and each mode of the FMF is a linear process,22,23 and the total coupling efficiency of the FMF is equal to the sum of the coupling efficiencies of each mode,

ηtot=jηj
(6)

In the space laser–FMF coupling system with random angular jitter, the angle between the space laser at the entrance pupil plane and the optical axis of the coupling lens has a random jitter angle θ, which can approximately satisfy the Rayleigh distribution, and its probability density function can be expressed as20 

pθ=θσθ2expθ22σθ2,
(7)

where σθ is the standard deviation of the random deviation angle.

The incident laser has a random jitter angle θ with respect to the optical axis, and the space laser spot in plane B will have a random deviation displacement Δr with respect to the fiber. The relationship between the random deviation displacement Δr in plane B and the random jitter angle θ can be expressed as13 

Δr=θf
(8)

Equation (8) shows that the random jitter displacement also satisfies the Rayleigh distribution, and the probability density of the random displacement jitter can be expressed as

pΔr=Δrσr2expΔr22σr2,
(9)

where σr is the standard deviation of the random displacement jitter,

σr=σθf,
(10)

where σθ is the measured value and σr is the calculated value.

In the space laser–FMF coupling system, the coupling efficiency value calculated on plane A with the random jitter angle equals the coupling efficiency value calculated on plane B with the random deviation displacement.24,25 In plane B, the coupling effect of the random deviation displacement of the space laser facular relative to the FMF is equivalent to the random jitter displacement of the FMF relative to the space laser facular. After the fiber has displaced in the focal plane, the fiber mode field function concerning the parameters can be represented by a Nakagami–Rice distribution.14,18 Taking a quad-mode fiber as an example, with the random deviation displacement Δr on plane B according Eq. (3), LP01, LP11, LP02, and LP21 are expressed as

F01r,Δr=2πrexpr2+Δr22ω2I0rΔrω2,F11r,Δr=22πrr+Δrexpr2+Δr22ω2I0rΔrω2sinφcosφ,F02r,Δr=23πrr+Δr2expr2+Δr22ω2I0rΔrω2,F21r,Δr=4πrr+Δr3expr2+Δr22ω2I0rΔrω2sinφcosφ,
(11)

where I0 is a modified Bessel function of the first kind of order 0 and the other parameters have the same meaning as those in Eq. (3).

The coupling efficiency should be averaged over all states of the random deviation displacement Δr, which is the average coupling efficiency. In plane B, the coupling efficiency of the j-th mode in an FMF with random angular jitter is expressed as

ηj=BEB*rFjr,ΔrpΔrdrdΔr2BEBr2dr.
(12)

As the Laguerre–Gaussian function is used to approximate the laser mode, Eq. (11) shows that the high-order mode of the FMF contains the sum of squares of absolute values. The coupling efficiency calculation can be simplified as

r+Δr=r+Δr22rΔr.
(13)

Substituting Eq. (13) into Eq. (12), the coupling efficiency of the j-th order mode can be expressed as

<ηjKσr2rαexpr22ω2J1kDr2fΔrβ×expσr2+ω22ω2σr2Δr2I0rΔrω2dΔrdr2,
(14)

where K is a constant term in the integral and α and β are positive integer multiples of 1/2,

Δrβexpσr2+ω22ω2σr2Δr2I0rΔrω2dΔr=β/2ω2+σ22ω2σ2β/2expω2+σ22ω2σ2Δr2I0rΔrω2dΔr=β/2ω2+σ22ω2σ2β/2ω2rexpr2σr22ω2σr2+ω2.
(15)

Substituting Eq. (15) into Eq. (14), the coupling efficiency of the j-th order mode can be expressed as

<ηjKσr2rαexpr22ω2J1kDr2f×β/2ω2+σ22ω2σ2β/2ω2rexpr2σr22ω2σr2+ω2dr2.
(16)

The average coupling efficiency of the space laser–FMF system with random jitter was calculated previously. The coupling efficiency of the FMF is converted into the level of the photodetector. The BER of an optical receiver for an intensity-modulation and direct-detection system with non-return-to-zero can be expressed as15,18

BERQ=12erfcQ2,
(17)

where erfc(·) is the complementary error function and Q is the SNR ratio parameter.

The change in the average bit error rate of the communication system caused by the random angle jitter of the entrance pupil plane is equivalent to the change in the average BER of the communication system caused by the random displacement of the focal plane. Therefore, the BER of the space laser–FMF coupling structure with random angular jitter can be expressed as

BER=12pΔrerfcQ2ηΔrdΔr
(18)

The space laser wavelength used in the numerical simulation is 1550 nm, the diameter of the quad-mode fiber is 15 µm, and the numerical aperture is 0.15.

FMFs have multiple modes, and it is necessary to calculate the coupling efficiency of each mode when determining the optimal coupling parameters according to the coupling efficiency. The coupling efficiency for each mode and the total coupling efficiency of a quad-mode fiber are plotted in Fig. 2.

FIG. 2.

Coupling efficiency of each mode and the total coupling efficiency of a quad-mode fiber as a function of the relative aperture in the absence of random jitter.

FIG. 2.

Coupling efficiency of each mode and the total coupling efficiency of a quad-mode fiber as a function of the relative aperture in the absence of random jitter.

Close modal

Figure 2 shows the coupling efficiency for each mode of the quad-mode fiber as a function of the relative aperture without random jitter. Under the same coupling conditions, the coupling efficiency between the LP01 mode and the space laser is the highest, and it plays a major role in the coupling process between the quad-mode fiber and the space laser. The coupling efficiency of the LP02 mode is significantly lower than that of the LP01 mode. The coupling efficiency of the LP11 mode and LP21 mode is similar: 0. The optimal value of the coupling lens’ relative aperture corresponding to the quad-mode fiber’s total coupling efficiency is smaller than the coupling efficiency corresponding to the basic mode because under the same coupling conditions, the total coupling efficiency of the quad-mode fiber and the space laser is larger than that of the basic mode, and the coupling ability of the coupling lens is required to be stronger; thus, the corresponding relative aperture value becomes smaller.

The optimal value of the total coupling efficiency and the basic mode coupling efficiency corresponds to different relative aperture values. Although the coupling efficiency of the LP02 mode is small, its influence on the optimal value of the total coupling efficiency cannot be ignored. When using the coupling lens’ relative aperture to optimize the FMF’s coupling efficiency, the relative aperture value obtained based on the best value of the total coupling efficiency is better than that of the basic-mode coupling efficiency.

As shown in Fig. 3, the total coupling efficiency of the quad-mode fiber with random jitter standard deviations is 1, 2, and 3. The random jitter standard deviation σr increases from 1 to 3, and the coupling efficiency greatly decreases from 0.89 to 0.34. The increase in the random jitter standard deviation leads to a fast decrease in the optimal value of the coupling efficiency of the quad-mode fiber. This result is predictable because the larger the random jitter standard deviation, the more the space laser spot on the focal plane deviates from the fiber core, and the more obvious the decrease in the coupling efficiency.

FIG. 3.

Total coupling efficiency of the quad-mode fiber as a function of the relative aperture with different random jitter standard deviations.

FIG. 3.

Total coupling efficiency of the quad-mode fiber as a function of the relative aperture with different random jitter standard deviations.

Close modal

The optimal value of the relative aperture of the coupled lens also decreases with the increase in the standard deviation of the random jitter. When the σr value is 1, the optimal value of the relative aperture value is 0.21, σr increases to 3, and the optimal value of the relative aperture value decreases to 0.16. These results can be explained by the fact that the larger the standard deviation of random jitter, the worse the coupling effect of the space laser-quad-mode fiber. Reducing the lens’ relative aperture can improve its coupling ability to the space laser, increasing the coupling efficiency of the FMF. In the presence of random jitter, the optimal value obtained based on all modes of the FMF improves the maximum coupling efficiency by about 5% compared to that based on the LP01 mode15 in the FMF.

Figure 4 shows that as the standard deviation of random jitter increases, the optimization method based on the relative aperture of the coupling lens significant improves the coupling efficiency. When σr is 0, the improvement in the coupling efficiency is more than 0, which can be explained by the fact that the standard deviation of random jitter is 0 but the random jitter value is not 0, and there is still a random jitter resulting in reduced coupling efficiency. When σr is less than 1, the optimal value of the relative aperture improves the coupling efficiency by less than 5%. This result indicates that when the random jitter standard deviation is small, the improvement in the coupling efficiency by the optimal value of the relative aperture is not obvious because when the random jitter standard deviation is slight, the coupling efficiency is still close to that without random jitter. When σr is 5, the coupling efficiency after optimization is increased by 29% compared with that before optimization. The standard deviation of random jitter increases, and the growth rate of coupling efficiency also increases significantly after optimization, which indicates that the coupling ability of the coupling lens to the space laser increases synchronously with the increase in random jitter, and the value of coupling efficiency after optimization is significantly higher than that before optimization. Thus, in an environment with large random jitter, the method based on the optimal value of the relative aperture of the coupling lens can significantly improve the coupling efficiency and have a good optimization effect.

FIG. 4.

Improvement ratio of coupling efficiency by the optimal value of the relative aperture as a function of standard deviation of random angular jitter.

FIG. 4.

Improvement ratio of coupling efficiency by the optimal value of the relative aperture as a function of standard deviation of random angular jitter.

Close modal

Figure 5 shows the BER of the space laser–quad-mode fiber as a function of the relative aperture of the coupling lens when the coupling parameter Q = 5. In the space laser–FMF coupling system with random angular jitter, the BER corresponding to the optimal value of the relative aperture is the smallest. As the relative aperture value deviates from the optimum value, the BER increases rapidly, which shows that the numerical value of the BER is sensitive to the optimal value of the relative aperture value.

FIG. 5.

Average BER as a function of the relative aperture with different random jitter standard deviations for Q = 5.

FIG. 5.

Average BER as a function of the relative aperture with different random jitter standard deviations for Q = 5.

Close modal

The coupling lens designed based on the optimal value of the relative aperture can significantly reduce the BER of the space laser–FMF communication system; compared with the optimization method based on the optimal parameter of the basic mode,15 the average BER is reduced by 10%. When the relative aperture of the coupling lens is at the optimal value, σr increases from 1 to 3, leading to the minimum value of the average BER increasing by a factor of 104. With the increase in random jitter standard deviation, the average BER of the coupling system increases significantly, and the reliability of communication performance is dramatically reduced. The drop rate of the average BER is plotted in Fig. 6 by optimizing the optimal value of the relative aperture when Q = 5.

FIG. 6.

Reduction ratio of the average BER by the optimal value of the relative aperture with different random jitter standard deviations for Q = 5.

FIG. 6.

Reduction ratio of the average BER by the optimal value of the relative aperture with different random jitter standard deviations for Q = 5.

Close modal

Figure 6 shows the average BER reduction with different random jitter standard deviations after optimization of the relative aperture optimum for Q = 5. As the standard deviation of random jitter increases, there is a maximum value of the reduction rate of the BER by the relative aperture optimization. When σr is less than 2, the reduction rate of the BER optimized based on the relative aperture optimum value increases as the standard deviation increases. When σr is 2, the maximum reduction ratio of the average BER optimized by the optimal value of the relative aperture is 55%. This result can be explained by the fact that the greater the standard deviation of random jitter, the lower the value of the BER of the coupling system, and the more difficult it is to reduce the BER by the optimal value of the relative aperture. The method of optimizing the coupling system based on the optimal value of the relative aperture has an upper limit on the reduction rate of the BER.

As shown in Fig. 7, when the SNR parameter Q is 3, 6, and 9, the reduction ratio of the BER of the space laser–quad-mode fiber coupling system is a function of the standard deviation of random jitter. When Q increases from 3 to 9, the maximum value of the reduction ratio of the average BER after optimization by the relative aperture optimum value increases from 27% to 89%, which indicates that in the coupling system composed of the space laser–quad-mode fiber, the maximum value of the reduction ratio of the average BER relates to the SNR parameter Q. The larger the Q in the coupling system, the higher the optimal upper limit of the optimal value of the relative aperture to the average BER.

FIG. 7.

Reduction ratio of the BER obtained by optimization as a function of the random jitter standard deviation σr for the SNR parameter Q = 3, 6, and 9.

FIG. 7.

Reduction ratio of the BER obtained by optimization as a function of the random jitter standard deviation σr for the SNR parameter Q = 3, 6, and 9.

Close modal

In the coupling environment of the quad-mode fiber and the space laser with three different SNR parameters, the reduction ratio of the BER reaches a maximum when σ = 2. When σr is greater than 2, the optimization effect by the relative aperture on the BER gradually decreases; with the increase in the standard deviation of random jitter, the optimization effect of the relative aperture optimum value on the BER decreases, independent of the SNR parameter Q.

Based on the Laguerre–Gaussian model, this paper established a coupling model of the space laser–FMF system with random angular jitter and simulated and analyzed it with a quad-mode fiber. Studies have shown that the coupling lens has an optimal relative aperture that results in the best coupling efficiency and BER. Under the influence of different random jitter standard deviations, the coupling system’s ability to resist random jitter is improved by optimizing the coupling lens’ relative aperture, which is reflected in the increase in the coupling efficiency and the decrease in the BER after optimization. With the increase in the standard deviation of random jitter, the optimization degree of the optimal value of the relative aperture to the coupling efficiency gradually increases. It is worth noting that, affected by random jitter, the optimal value of the relative aperture has an upper limit on the optimization ability of the average BER. The greater the SNR in the communication system, the greater the reduction rate of the optimized BER. Our future works will consider more complex cases, including optimizing the coupling efficiency in the presence of thermal effects.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose

Zhaoyuan Zhang: Formal analysis (lead); Software (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request

1.
G.
Labroille
,
B.
Denolle
,
P.
Jian
,
P.
Genevaux
,
N.
Treps
, and
J.-F.
Morizur
, “
Efficient and mode selective spatial mode multiplexer based on multi-plane light conversion
,”
Opt. Express
22
,
15599
(
2014
).
2.
D.-Y.
Song
,
Y.-S.
Hurh
,
J.-w.
Cho
,
J.-H.
Lim
,
D.-W.
Lee
,
J.-S.
Lee
, and
Y.
Chung
, “
4 × 10 Gb/s terrestrial optical free space transmission over 1.2 km using an EDFA preamplifier with 100 GHz channel spacing
,”
Opt. Express
7
,
280
(
2000
).
3.
Y.
Weng
,
X.
He
, and
Z.
Pan
, “
Space division multiplexing optical communication using few-mode fibers
,”
Opt. Fiber Technol.
36
,
155
(
2017
).
4.
T.
Mori
,
T.
Sakamoto
,
M.
Wada
,
T.
Yamamoto
, and
K.
Nakajima
, “
Few-mode fiber technology for mode division multiplexing
,”
Opt. Fiber Technol.
35
,
37
(
2017
).
5.
L.
Grüner-Nielsen
,
N. M.
Mathew
, and
K.
Rottwitt
, “
Invited paper: Characterization of few mode fibers and devices
,”
Opt. Fiber Technol.
52
,
101972
(
2019
).
6.
F. M.
Ferreira
,
C. S.
Costa
,
S.
Sygletos
, and
A. D.
Ellis
, “
Nonlinear performance of few-mode fiber links with intermediate coupling
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
37
,
989
(
2019
).
7.
G.
Rademacher
,
R. S.
Luis
,
B. J.
Puttnam
,
R.
Ryf
,
S. v. d.
Heide
,
T. A.
Eriksson
,
N. K.
Fontaine
,
H.
Chen
,
R.-J.
Essiambre
,
Y.
Awaji
, and
H.
Furukawa
, “
A comparative study of few-mode fiber and coupled-core multi-core fiber transmission
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
40
,
1590
(
2022
).
8.
H.
Liu
,
H.
Wen
, and
G.
Li
, “
Applications of weakly-coupled few-mode fibers [Invited]
,”
Chin. Opt. Lett.
18
,
040601
(
2020
).
9.
D. Z.
Wei
,
Y.
Cheng
,
R.
Ni
,
Y.
Zhang
,
X.
Hu
,
S.
Zhu
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Generating controllable Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes through intracavity spin-orbital angular momentum conversion of light
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
11
,
014038
(
2019
).
10.
M.
Toyoshima
,
T.
Jono
,
K.
Nakagawa
, and
A.
Yamamoto
, “
Optimum divergence angle of a Gaussian beam wave in the presence of random jitter in free-space laser communication systems
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
19
,
567
(
2002
).
11.
C.
Wang
,
X.
Fan
,
S.
Tong
,
Y.
Li
,
L.
Jiang
,
Z.
Liu
,
H.
Shi
, and
H.
Jiang
, “
Coupling efficiency and influence factors of spatial light into few-mode fiber
,”
Acta Photonica Sin.
47
,
1206001
(
2018
).
12.
Z.
Guang
and
Y.
Zhang
, “
Coupling ultrafast laser pulses into few-mode optical fibers: A numerical study of the spatiotemporal field coupling efficiency
,”
Appl. Opt.
57
,
9835
(
2018
).
13.
Z.
Guang
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
P.
Zhu
, “
Ultrashort laser pulse spatiotemporal profile manipulation using a single-mode-few-mode optical fiber device
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
38
,
F152
(
2021
).
14.
A.
Fardoost
,
H.
Wen
,
H.
Liu
,
F. G.
Vanani
, and
G.
Li
, “
Optimizing free space to few-mode fiber coupling efficiency
,”
Appl. Opt.
58
,
D34
(
2019
).
15.
X.
Fan
,
D.
Wang
,
J.
Cheng
,
J.
Yang
, and
J.
Ma
, “
Few-mode fiber coupling efficiency for free-space optical communication
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
39
,
1823
(
2020
).
16.
J.
Ma
,
F.
Zhao
,
L.
Tan
,
S.
Yu
, and
Q.
Han
, “
Plane wave coupling into single-mode fiber in the presence of random angular jitter
,”
Appl. Opt.
48
,
5184
(
2009
).
17.
F.
Zhao
,
J.
Ma
,
S.
Yu
,
L.
Tan
, and
Q.
Han
, “
Impact of random angular jitter on fiber-coupled differential phase-shift keying receivers with Mach–Zehnder interferometer demodulation
,”
Appl. Opt.
49
,
6024
(
2010
).
18.
M.
Toyoshima
, “
Optimum divergence angle of a Gaussian beam wave in the presence of random jitter in free-space laser communication systems
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
23
,
2246
(
2006
).
19.
C.
Yang
,
M.
Wang
,
M.
Tang
,
H.
Wu
,
C.
Zhao
,
T.
Liu
,
S.
Fu
, and
W.
Tong
, “
Link optimized few-mode fiber Raman distributed temperature sensors
,”
Appl. Opt.
57
,
6923
(
2018
).
20.
A. J.
Horton
and
J.
Bland-Hawthorn
, “
Coupling light into few-mode optical fibers I: The diffraction limit
,”
Opt. Express
15
,
1443
(
2007
).
21.
Q.
Hu
,
L.
Zhen
,
Y.
Mao
,
S.
Zhu
,
X.
Zhou
, and
G.
Zhou
, “
Adaptive stochastic parallel gradient descent approach for efficient fiber coupling
,”
Opt. Express
28
,
13141
(
2020
).
22.
M. M.
Ali
,
Y.
Jung
,
K.-S.
Lim
,
M. R.
Islam
,
S.-U.
Alam
,
D. J.
Richardson
, and
H.
Ahmad
, “
Characterization of mode coupling in few-mode FBG with selective mode excitation
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
27
,
1713
(
2015
).
23.
T.
Wang
,
A.
Yang
,
F.
Shi
,
Y.
Huang
,
J.
Wen
, and
X.
Zeng
, “
High-order mode lasing in all-FMF laser cavities
,”
Photonics Res.
7
,
42
(
2019
).
24.
O.
Wallner
,
P. J.
Winzer
, and
W. R.
Leeb
, “
Alignment tolerances for plane-wave to single-mode fiber coupling and their mitigation by use of pigtailed collimators
,”
Appl. Opt.
41
,
637
(
2002
).
25.
Y.
Chen
,
L.
Tan
,
L.
Zhao
, and
J.
Ma
, “
The influence of alignment tolerance on coupling efficiency of FSOC system based on few-mode fiber
,”
J. Opt.
22
,
015602
(
2020
).