In this paper, using the extended rational sine–cosine and rational sinh–cosh methods, we find new soliton solutions for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations. The extended rational sine–cosine and rational sinh–cosh methods are prospering in finding soliton solutions of the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations. By means of these methods, we found some young solitons of the above mentioned equation. The conclusions we receive are dark, bright, and periodic. In addition, in order to imagine the underlying dynamics of the obtained soliton solutions, 2D and 3D plots are drawn.

Research on the exact traveling wave solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) and fractional differential, which portray physics phenomena, has become very important in the literature.1,2 Because many natural phenomena can be modeled in the form of these equations, it is always important to find the exact solution to them. In particular, problems in physical phenomena, engineering, and basic sciences can be modeled in the form of the above equations. Thus, a proliferation of coalition techniques, including multiple scale method,3 new extended direct algebraic method,4 auxiliary equation method,5,6 sine–cosine method,7,8 sine-Gordon expansion method,9 Liu’s extended trial function method,10 Hirota bilinear method,11 the first integral method,12,13 similarity transformation,14 extended trial method,15 Jacobi’s elliptic function expansion method,16 and extended F-expansion and projective Ricatti equation methods,17 were involved in the study of specific solitary wave solutions of PDEs.18–44 Recently, the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov (KGZ) equations have engrossed much consideration in different branches, such as biology, plasma physics, and optic fibers. In this paper, our purpose is to manufacture a new solitary wave solution by the extended rational sine–cosine and rational sinh–cosh methods to the KGZ equations. The residual part of this paper is formed as follows: in Sec. II, algorithms of extended rational sinh–cosh and sine–cosine methods are presented. In Sec. III, we represent these techniques with the KGZ equations. In addition, we consider the graphical representation of some acquired solutions in Sec. IV. Indeed, conclusion is provided in Sec. V.

Consider nonlinear PDE of the form as

F(ψ,ψx,ψt,ψxx,ψxt,)=0,
(1)

where ψ = ψ(x, t) is a traveling wave solution of nonlinear PDE (1).

Using the following transformation:

ψ(x,t)=ψ(ξ),ξ=ωx+kt,
(2)

where k is the wave speed, Eq. (1) can be converted into an ODE as follows:

G(ψ,kψ,ψ,k2ψ,ψ,kψ,)=0,
(3)

where the prime denotes ξ. Then integrate ODE (3) as long as all terms contain derivatives and neglect integration constants.45 

  • Suppose that Eq. (3) has the solution in the form of
    ψ(ξ)=a0sin(ηξ)a2+a1cos(ηξ),cos(ηξ)a2a1
    (4)
    or
    ψ(ξ)=a0cos(ηξ)a2+a1sin(ηξ),sin(ηξ)a2a1,
    (5)
    where ai, (i = 0, 1, 2) are parameters to be determined and η is the wave number.
  • Unknown constants can be found by substituting Eq. (4) or Eq. (5) into Eq. (3), collecting all terms with the same powers of cos(ηξ)m or sin(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cos(ηξ)m or sin(ηξ)m yield a set of algebraic equations. By calculation using the Maple software, the solutions of the algebraic equations can be derived.

  • By substituting the values of a0, a1, a2, c, and η into Eq. (4) or Eq. (5), the solution of Eq. (3) can be found.

  • Suppose that Eq. (3) has the solution in the form
    ψ(ξ)=a0sinh(ηξ)a2+a1cosh(ηξ),cosh(ηξ)a2a1
    (6)
    or
    ψ(ξ)=a0cosh(ηξ)a2+a1sinh(ηξ),sinh(ηξ)a2a1,
    (7)
    where ai, (i = 0, 1, 2) are parameters to be determined and η is the wave number.
  • Substituting Eq. (6) or Eq. (7) into Eq. (3), collecting all terms with the same powers of cosh(ηξ)m or sinh(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cosh(ηξ)m or sinh(ηξ)m yield a set of algebraic equations. The values of the unknowns are to be determined by solving the algebraic equations.

  • The solution of Eq. (3) can be found by substituting the values of a0, a1, a2, c, and η into Eq. (6) or Eq. (7).

Suppose the KGZ equations defined by Eqs. (8) and (9),18 

ϕttϕxx+αvϕ=0,
(8)
vttvxx=β(|ϕ|2)xx,
(9)

where ϕ(x, t) stands for a complex function, while v(x, t) is a real function, t shows the time, and x is the distance along the direction of publication. Therefore, α and β are nonzero parameters.

To construct the soliton wave solution to the KGZ equations [Eqs. (8) and (9)], we adopt the transformation in the form of

ϕ(x,t)=ψ(x,t)exp[i(kx+ωt+θ)],ξ=ωx+kt,
(10)

where ψ(x, t) = ψ(ξ) is a real function, while k and ω are constants to be determined, and θ stands for an arbitrary constant.

Inserting (10) into (8) and (9) gives

ψttψxx+(1ω2+k2)ϕ+αvψ=0,
(11)
ωψtkψxψ=0,
(12)
vttvxx=β(ψ2)xx.
(13)

Using (10), it is obtained from (11) that

v(x,t)=(ω2k2)αψψ(ξ)+ω2k2+1α.
(14)

Next, to surmise v(x, t) = W(ξ) and insert (14) in (13), after integrating twice with a nonzero constant value, it is recovered that

W(ξ)=(βω2)k2ω2ψ2(ξ)+C,
(15)

where C is an integration constant. Inserting (15) in (11) leads to

ψ+Δk2ω2ψ(x)+αβω2(k2ω2)2ψ3=0,
(16)

where Δ = αC + k2ω2 + 1. Now, instead of solving the main equation, we solve the last equation [Eq. (16)], and with the method mentioned in the second part and using the Maple software, we obtain the equation coefficients. After solving the system of equations, the following set of solutions is obtained for numerical coefficients.46 

Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form of

ψ(ξ)=a0sin(ηξ)a2+a1cos(ηξ).
(17)

Substituting Eq. (17) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of cos(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cos(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:

cos(ηξ)2:Cα2a12Cαω2a12αβω2a02+k4a122k2ω2a12+a12ω4+k2a12ω2a12,cos(ηξ)1:η2k4a1a22η2k2ω2a1a2+η2ω4a1a2+2Cαk2a1a22Cαω2a1a2+2k4a1a24k2ω2a1a2+2ω4a1a2+2k2a1a22ω2a1a2,cos(ηξ)0:η21ω2+η2+1k2+Cα+1kω×k+ωa22+2η2ω4a12+4k2η2a12+αβa02ω2+2η2k4a12.

After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:

Set 1)η=±Δ2k22ω2,a0=±2Δk2ω2,a1=a1,a2=0,Set 2)η=±2Δk2ω2,a0=±a2ωΔ(k2ω2)αβ,a1=±a2,a2=a2.
  • Taking set 1 into account, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ1(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβtan122Δk2ω2ξω.
    (18)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (18), we get
    ϕ1(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβtan122Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+ωt+θω,
    (19)
    W1(x,t)=ΔtanΔ2k22ω2kt+ωx2α+C.
    (20)
  • Similarly, for set 2, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ2(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβsin2Δk2ω2ξωcos2Δk2ω2ξ1.
    (21)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (21), we get
    ϕ2(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβsin2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx1,
    (22)
    W2(x,t)=Δsin2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx12+C.
    (23)
  • Similarly, for set 2, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ3(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβsin2Δk2ω2ξωcos2Δk2ω2ξ+1.
    (24)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (24), we get
    ϕ3(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβsin2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+1,
    (25)
    W3(x,t)=Δsin2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+12+C.
    (26)
    OR
    Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form of
    ψ(ξ)=a0cos(ηξ)a2+a1sin(ηξ).
    (27)
    Substituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of sin(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of sin(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:
    sin(ηξ)2:Cαk2a12+Cαω2a12+αβω2a02k4a12+2k2ω2a12ω4a12k2a12+ω2a12a0,sin(ηξ)1:η2a2a1k4+2η2a2a1k2ω2η2a2a1ω42Cαk2a2a1+2Cαω2a2a12a1a2k4+4a1a2k2ω22a1a2ω42k2a2a1+2ω2a2a1a0,sin(ηξ)0:a0kωk+ωη21ω2+η2+1k2+Cα+1a22+2η2ω4a12+4η2k2a12+αβa02ω2+2η2k4a12.
    After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:
    Set 3)η=±Δ2k22ω2,a0=±Δ2k22ω2,a1=a1,a2=0,Set 4)η=±2Δk2ω2,a0=±a2ωΔ(k2ω2)αβ,a1=±a2,a2=a2.
  • Taking set 3 into account, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ4(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβcot122Δk2ω2ξω.
    (28)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (28), we get
    ϕ4(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβcot122Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+ωt+θω,
    (29)
    W4(x,t)=ΔcotΔ2k22ω2kt+ωx2α+C.
    (30)
  • Similarly, for set 4, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ5(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβcos2Δk2ω2ξωsin2Δk2ω2ξ+1.
    (31)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (31), we get
    ϕ5(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωsin2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+1,
    (32)
    W5(x,t)=Δcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx22sin2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2+C.
    (33)
  • Similarly, for set 4, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ6(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβcos2Δk2ω2ξωsin2Δk2ω2ξ+1.
    (34)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (34), we get
    ϕ6(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωsin2Δk2ω2kt+ωx1,
    (35)
    W6(x,t)=Δcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcos2Δk2ω2kt+ωx22sin2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2+C.
    (36)

Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form of

ψ(ξ)=a0sinh(ηξ)a2+a1cosh(ηξ).
(37)

Substituting Eq. (37) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of cosh(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cosh(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:

cosh(ηξ)2:Cαk2a12Cαω2a12αβω2a02+k4a122k2ω2a12+ω4a12+k2a12ω2a12,cosh(ηξ)1:η2k4a1a22η2k2ω2a1a2+η2ω4a1a2+2Cαk2a1a22Cαω2a1a2+2k4a1a24k2ω2a1a2+2ω4a1a2+2k2a1a22ω2a1a2,cosh(ηξ)0:k+ωkωη21ω2+η2+1k2+αC+1a22+2η2ω4a12+4η2k2a12+a02baω2+2η2k4a12.

After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:

Set 5)±η=Δ2k22ω2,a0=±a1ωΔ(k2ω2)αβ,a1=a1,a2=0,Set 6)±η=2Δk2ω2,a0=±a2ωΔ(k2ω2)αβ,a1=±a2,a2=a2.
  • Taking set 5 into account, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ7(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβtanh122Δk2ω2ξω.
    (38)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (38), we get
    ϕ7(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβtanh122Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+ωt+θω,
    (39)
    W7(x,t)=ΔtanhΔ2k22ω2kt+ωx2α+C.
    (40)
  • Similarly, for set 6, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ8(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβsinh2Δk2ω2ξωcosh2Δk2ω2ξ1.
    (41)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (41), we get
    ϕ8(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβsinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx1,
    (42)
    W8(x,t)=Δsinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx12+C.
    (43)
  • Similarly, for set 6, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ9(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβsinh2Δk2ω2ξωcosh2Δk2ω2ξ+1.
    (44)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (44), we get
    ϕ9(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβsinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+1,
    (45)
    W9(x,t)=Δsinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+12+C.
    (46)
    OR
    Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form of
    ψ(ξ)=a0cosh(ηξ)a2+a1sinh(ηξ).
    (47)
    Substituting Eq. (47) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of sinh(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of sinh(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:
    sinh(ηξ)2:Cαk2a12Cαω2a12αβω2a02+k4a122k2ω2a12+ω4a12+k2a12ω2a12a0,
    sinh(ηξ)1:η2a2a1k4+2η2a2a1k2ω2η2a2a1ω42aCk2a2a1+2aCω2a2a12a2a1k4+4a2a1k2ω22a2a1ω42a2a1k2+2ω2a1a2a0,sinh(ηξ)0:a0k+ωkωη21ω2+η2+1k2+αC+1a22+2η2ω4a12+4η2k2a12+αβa02ω2+2η2k4a12.
    After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:
    Set 7)η=±Δ2k22ω2,a0=±a1ωΔ(k2ω2)αβ,a1=a1,a2=0,Set 8)±η=2Δk2ω2,a0=±a2ωΔ(k2ω2)αβ,a1=±a2,a2=a2.
  • Taking set 7 into account, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ10(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβcoth122Δk2ω2ξω.
    (48)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (48), we get
    ϕ10(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβcoth122Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+ωt+θω,
    (49)
    W10(x,t)=ΔcothΔ2k22ω2kt+ωx2α+C.
    (50)
  • Similarly, for set 8, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ11(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβcosh2Δk2ω2ξωsinh2Δk2ω2ξ+1.
    (51)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (51), we get
    ϕ11(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωsinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+1,
    (52)
    W11(x,t)=Δcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx22sinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx+2+C.
    (53)
  • Similarly, for set 8, the solutions of (16) can be obtained as
    ψ12(ξ)=±Δk2ω2αβcosh2Δk2ω2ξωsinh2Δk2ω2ξ1.
    (54)
    Combining Eqs. (10) and (54), we get
    ϕ12(x,t)=±Δk2ω2αβcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωxeikx+tω+θωsinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx1,
    (55)
    W12(x,t)=Δcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2αcosh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx22sinh2Δk2ω2kt+ωx2+C.
    (56)

In this section, we have provided the 2D and 3D graphs to some of the acquired conclusions based on the appropriate values of the parameters. We also checked the wave behaviors of the KGZ equations by using extended rational sine–cosine and extended rational sinh–cosh methods. The soliton wave solutions are acquired by the offered methods and graphically determined into a diversity of distinguished physical structures, such as periodic, dark, and bright soliton functions. These functions have different physical significance.

In this text, Fig. 1 illustrates 2D and 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of the Eq. |ϕ1(x, t)| for the parametric values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.

FIG. 1.

The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 1.

The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

Figure 2 shows 2D and 3D bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.

FIG. 2.

The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 2.

The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

Figure 3 represents 2D and 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of the Eq. |ϕ4(x, t)| for the parametric values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics. Figure 4 also indicates 2D and 3D bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics that are similar in shape like Fig. 2.

FIG. 3.

The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 3.

The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal
FIG. 4.

The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 4.

The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

Figure 5 shows 2D and 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. |ϕ7(x, t)| for the KGZ at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.

FIG. 5.

The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 5.

The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

Figure 6 also indicates 2D and 3D dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) at α = 3, k = 0.2, = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics that are similar in shape like Fig. 5.

FIG. 6.

The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 6.

The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

Figure 7 shows the cusp wave soliton solution that comes from Eq. (49) for the parametric values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.

FIG. 7.

The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 7.

The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

Figure 8 also indicates 2D and 3D dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics that are similar in shape like Fig. 7.

FIG. 8.

The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

FIG. 8.

The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).

Close modal

In this paper, plentiful new soliton solutions for the KGZ equations were checked by extended rational sine–cosine (ERSC) and extended rational sinh–cosh methods. These methods are useful for finding soliton and singular periodic solutions of nonlinear PDEs and have been successfully applied to obtain some new soliton solutions to the KGZ equations to attain the purpose. First, we assume that KGZ equations have the answer as mentioned above. Then, by placing this answer in the KGZ equations, we arrive at a set of equations. Then, we find the coefficients of this system of equations using Maple or Mathematics software and then we find a new soliton wave solution by placing them in the KGZ equations. We note that comparatively with Refs. 18, 19, and 47, the received conclusions are more special. We expect that the gained one soliton solutions should be beneficial in solitary wave theory.

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71601072), the Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province of China (Grant No. 20B110006), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (Grant No. NSFRF210314).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
S.
Meng
and
Y.
Cui
, “
Multiplicity results to a conformable fractional differential equations involving integral boundary condition
,”
Complexity
2019
,
8402347
.
2.
J.-C.
Sun
,
Z.-G.
Zhang
,
H.-H.
Dong
, and
H.-W.
Yang
, “
Fractional order model and Lump solution in dusty plasma
,”
Acta Phys.
68
,
210201
(
2019
).
3.
J.
Kevorkian
and
J. D.
Cole
, “
The method of multiple scales for ordinary differential equations
,” in
Multiple Scale and Singular Perturbation Methods
(
Springer
,
New York, NY
,
1996
), pp.
267
409
.
4.
S. M.
Mirhosseini-Alizamini
 et al, “
New extended direct algebraic method for the Tzitzica type evolution equations arising in nonlinear optics
,”
Comput. Methods Differ. Equations
8
,
28
53
(
2020
).
5.
A. A.
Alderremy
 et al, “
Analytical and semi-analytical wave solutions for longitudinal wave equation via modified auxiliary equation method and Adomian decomposition method
,”
Therm. Sci.
23
,
1943
1957
(
2019
).
6.
H.
Rezazadeh
 et al, “
A large family of optical solutions to Kundu–Eckhaus model by a new auxiliary equation method
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
51
,
84
(
2019
).
7.
R.
Cimpoiasu
and
A. S.
Pauna
, “
Complementary wave solutions for the long-short wave resonance model via the extended trial equation method and the generalized Kudryashov method
,”
Open Phys.
16
,
419
426
(
2018
).
8.
S.
Nestor
 et al, “
Exact optical solitons to the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation with dual-power law of nonlinearity
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
52
,
318
(
2020
).
9.
M.
Ali Akbar
 et al, “
Soliton solutions to the Boussinesq equation through sine-Gordon method and Kudryashov method
,”
Results Phys.
25
,
104228
(
2021
).
10.
H.
Rezazadeh
 et al, “
Mitigating internet bottleneck with fractional temporal evolution of optical solitons having quadratic-cubic nonlinearity
,”
Optik
164
,
84
92
(
2018
).
11.
X.
Lu
and
J.
Li
, “
Integrability with symbolic computation on the Bogoyavlensky–Konoplechenko model: Bell-polynomial manipulation, bilinear representation, and Wronskian solution
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
77
(
1–2
),
135
143
(
2014
).
12.
G.
Akram
and
N.
Mahak
, “
Application of the first integral method for solving (1 + 1) dimensional cubic-quintic complex Ginzburg–Landau equation
,”
Optik
164
,
210
217
(
2018
).
13.
G.
Akram
and
N.
Mahak
, “
Traveling wave and exact solutions for the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation with Kerr law nonlinearity
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
133
,
212
(
2018
).
14.
S.
Ali
 et al, “
Rogue wave solutions in nonlinear optics with coupled Schrödinger equations
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
50
,
266
(
2018
).
15.
N.
Badar
 et al, “
Optical soliton for perturbed nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation by extended trial function method
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
50
,
204
(
2018
).
16.
A. H.
Bhrawy
 et al, “
Cnoidal and snoidal wave solutions to coupled nonlinear wave equations by the extended Jacobi’s elliptic function method
,”
Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
18
,
915
925
(
2013
).
17.
H.
Kumar
and
F.
Chand
, “
Applications of extended F-expansion and projective Ricatti equation methods to (2 + 1)-dimensional soliton equations
,”
AIP Adv.
3
,
032128
(
2013
).
18.
C. H.
Zhao
and
Z. M.
Sheng
, “
Explicit travelling wave solutions for Zakharov equations
,”
Acta Phys. Sin.
53
(
6
),
1629
1634
(
2004
).
19.
S.
Yakada
,
B.
Depelair
,
G.
Betchewe
, and
S. Y.
Doka
, “
Miscellaneous new traveling waves in metamaterials by means of the new extended direct algebraic method
,”
Optik
197
,
163108
(
2019
).
20.
J.
Vahidi
,
S. M.
Zekavatmand
,
H.
Rezazadeh
,
M.
Inc
,
M. A.
Akinlar
, and
Y.-M.
Chu
, “
New solitary wave solutions to the coupled Maccari’s system
,”
Results Phys.
21
,
103801
(
2021
).
21.
A.
Houwe
 et al, “
The discrete tanh method for solving the nonlinear differential-difference equations
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
34
,
2050177
(
2020
).
22.
H.
Rezazadeh
 et al, “
The functional variable method to find new exact solutions of the nonlinear evolution equations with dual-power-law nonlinearity
,”
Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
21
,
249
257
(
2020
).
23.
R.
Cimpoiasu
and
C.
Radu
, “
Nonlinear self-adjointness and invariant solutions of a 2D Rossby wave equation
,”
Central Euro. J. Phys.
12
,
81
89
(
2014
).
24.
A.
Houwe
 et al, “
New traveling wave solutions of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödingers equation in the left-handed metamaterials
,”
Asian-Eur. J. Math.
13
,
2050022
(
2020
).
25.
A.
Houwe
 et al, “
Complex traveling-wave and solitons solutions to the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations
,”
Results Phys.
17
,
103127
(
2020
).
26.
Z.
Pinar
,
H.
Rezazadeh
, and
M.
Eslami
, “
Generalized logistic equation method for Kerr law and dual power law Schrödinger equations
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
52
(
12
),
504
(
2020
).
27.
A.
Houwe
 et al, “
Chirped solitons in negative index materials generated by Kerr nonlinearity
,”
Results Phys.
17
,
103097
(
2020
).
28.
J.-G.
Liu
 et al, “
The dynamical behavior of mixed type lump solutions on the (3+1)-dimensional generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Boussinesq equation
,”
Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
21
,
661
665
(
2020
).
29.
B.
Kilic
and
M.
Inc
, “
On optical solitons of the resonant Schrdingers equation in optical fibers with dual-power law nonlinearity and time-dependent coefcients
,”
Waves in Random and Complex Media
25
,
245
251
(
2015
).
30.
S.
Abbagari
 et al, “
Optical soliton to multi-core (coupling with all the neighbors) directional couplers and modulation instability
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
136
,
325
(
2021
).
31.
S.
Abbagari
 et al, “
Analytical survey of the predator-prey model with fractional derivative order
,”
AIP Adv.
11
,
035127
(
2021
).
32.
S.
Abbagari
 et al, “
Miscellaneous optical solitons in magneto-optic waveguides associated to the influence of the cross-phase modulation in instability spectra
,”
Phys. Scr.
96
,
045216
(
2021
).
33.
B.
Ghanbari
, “
Abundant exact solutions to a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with local fractional derivative
,”
Math. Methods Appl. Sci.
(published online 2021).
34.
B.
Ghanbari
, “
On novel nondifferentiable exact solutions to local fractional Gardner’s equation using an effective technique
,”
Math. Methods Appl. Sci.
44
(
6
),
4673
4685
(
2021
).
35.
B.
Ghanbari
 et al, “
Abundant solitary wave solutions to an extended nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation with conformable derivative using an efficient integration method
,”
Adv. Differ. Equations
2020
(
1
),
328
.
36.
H. M.
Srivastava
 et al, “
Exact traveling wave solutions for resonance nonlinear Schrödinger equation with intermodal dispersions and the Kerr law nonlinearity
,”
Math. Methods Appl. Sci.
42
(
18
),
7210
7221
(
2019
).
37.
K.
Hosseini
 et al, “
Soliton solutions of the Sasa–Satsuma equation in the monomode optical fibers including the beta-derivatives
,”
Optik
224
,
165425
(
2020
).
38.
K.
Hosseini
 et al, “
Dynamics of optical solitons in the perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation
,”
Optik
206
,
164350
(
2020
).
39.
K.
Hosseini
 et al, “
Optical wave structures to the Fokas–Lenells equation
,”
Optik
207
,
164450
(
2020
).
40.
L.
Akinyemi
,
M.
Senol
, and
O. S.
Iyiola
, “
Exact solutions of the generalized multidimensional mathematical physics models via sub-equation method
,”
Math. Comput. Simul.
182
,
211
233
(
2021
).
41.
L.
Akinyemi
 et al, “
Modified homotopy methods for generalized fractional perturbed Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation in dusty plasma
,”
Adv. Differ. Equations
2021
(
1
),
45
.
42.
L.
Akinyemi
 et al, “
Optical solitons for weakly nonlocal Schrödinger equation with parabolic law nonlinearity and external potential
,”
Optik
230
,
166281
(
2021
).
43.
M.
Senol
 et al, “
Approximate and generalized solutions of conformable type Coudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Sawada-Kotera equation
,”
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
35
(
02
),
2150021
(
2021
).
44.
S.
Abbagari
 et al, “
Controllable rational solutions in nonlinear optics fibers
,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus
135
,
633
(
2020
).
45.
M. T.
Darvishi
,
M.
Najafi
, and
A. M.
Wazwaz
, “
New extended rational trigonometric methods and applications
,”
Waves Random Complex Media
30
,
5
26
(
2020
).
46.
S.
Nestor
,
A.
Houwe
,
H.
Rezazadeh
,
A.
Bekir
,
G.
Betchewe
, and
S. Y.
Doka
, “
New solitary waves for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations
,”
Mod. Phys. Lett. B
34
,
2050246
(
2020
).
47.
A.
Houwe
,
B. H. M.
Klofai
, and
S. Y.
Doka
, “
Exact travelling envelope solitons and Kink-soliton solutions for the Josephson nonlinear left-handed transmission line
,”
Appl. Math.
5
,
77
84
(
2017
).