In this paper, using the extended rational sine–cosine and rational sinh–cosh methods, we find new soliton solutions for the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations. The extended rational sine–cosine and rational sinh–cosh methods are prospering in finding soliton solutions of the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations. By means of these methods, we found some young solitons of the above mentioned equation. The conclusions we receive are dark, bright, and periodic. In addition, in order to imagine the underlying dynamics of the obtained soliton solutions, 2D and 3D plots are drawn.
I. INTRODUCTION
Research on the exact traveling wave solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) and fractional differential, which portray physics phenomena, has become very important in the literature.1,2 Because many natural phenomena can be modeled in the form of these equations, it is always important to find the exact solution to them. In particular, problems in physical phenomena, engineering, and basic sciences can be modeled in the form of the above equations. Thus, a proliferation of coalition techniques, including multiple scale method,3 new extended direct algebraic method,4 auxiliary equation method,5,6 sine–cosine method,7,8 sine-Gordon expansion method,9 Liu’s extended trial function method,10 Hirota bilinear method,11 the first integral method,12,13 similarity transformation,14 extended trial method,15 Jacobi’s elliptic function expansion method,16 and extended F-expansion and projective Ricatti equation methods,17 were involved in the study of specific solitary wave solutions of PDEs.18–44 Recently, the Klein–Gordon–Zakharov (KGZ) equations have engrossed much consideration in different branches, such as biology, plasma physics, and optic fibers. In this paper, our purpose is to manufacture a new solitary wave solution by the extended rational sine–cosine and rational sinh–cosh methods to the KGZ equations. The residual part of this paper is formed as follows: in Sec. II, algorithms of extended rational sinh–cosh and sine–cosine methods are presented. In Sec. III, we represent these techniques with the KGZ equations. In addition, we consider the graphical representation of some acquired solutions in Sec. IV. Indeed, conclusion is provided in Sec. V.
II. METHOD AND ALGORITHM
Consider nonlinear PDE of the form as
where ψ = ψ(x, t) is a traveling wave solution of nonlinear PDE (1).
Using the following transformation:
where k is the wave speed, Eq. (1) can be converted into an ODE as follows:
A. Extended rational sine–cosine method
- Suppose that Eq. (3) has the solution in the form ofor(4)where ai, (i = 0, 1, 2) are parameters to be determined and η is the wave number.(5)
Unknown constants can be found by substituting Eq. (4) or Eq. (5) into Eq. (3), collecting all terms with the same powers of cos(ηξ)m or sin(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cos(ηξ)m or sin(ηξ)m yield a set of algebraic equations. By calculation using the Maple software, the solutions of the algebraic equations can be derived.
By substituting the values of a0, a1, a2, c, and η into Eq. (4) or Eq. (5), the solution of Eq. (3) can be found.
B. Extended rational sinh–cosh method
- Suppose that Eq. (3) has the solution in the formor(6)where ai, (i = 0, 1, 2) are parameters to be determined and η is the wave number.(7)
Substituting Eq. (6) or Eq. (7) into Eq. (3), collecting all terms with the same powers of cosh(ηξ)m or sinh(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cosh(ηξ)m or sinh(ηξ)m yield a set of algebraic equations. The values of the unknowns are to be determined by solving the algebraic equations.
The solution of Eq. (3) can be found by substituting the values of a0, a1, a2, c, and η into Eq. (6) or Eq. (7).
III. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE METHOD
where ϕ(x, t) stands for a complex function, while v(x, t) is a real function, t shows the time, and x is the distance along the direction of publication. Therefore, α and β are nonzero parameters.
To construct the soliton wave solution to the KGZ equations [Eqs. (8) and (9)], we adopt the transformation in the form of
where ψ(x, t) = ψ(ξ) is a real function, while k and ω are constants to be determined, and θ stands for an arbitrary constant.
Next, to surmise v(x, t) = W(ξ) and insert (14) in (13), after integrating twice with a nonzero constant value, it is recovered that
where Δ = αC + k2 − ω2 + 1. Now, instead of solving the main equation, we solve the last equation [Eq. (16)], and with the method mentioned in the second part and using the Maple software, we obtain the equation coefficients. After solving the system of equations, the following set of solutions is obtained for numerical coefficients.46
A. Soliton wave solution by ERSCM
Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form of
Substituting Eq. (17) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of cos(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cos(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:
After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:
- Similarly, for set 2, the solutions of (16) can be obtained asCombining Eqs. (10) and (24), we get(24)(25)OR(26)Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form ofSubstituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of sin(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of sin(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:(27)After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:
- Similarly, for set 4, the solutions of (16) can be obtained asCombining Eqs. (10) and (34), we get(34)(35)(36)
B. Soliton wave solution by extended rational sinh–cosh method
Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form of
Substituting Eq. (37) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of cosh(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of cosh(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:
After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:
- Similarly, for set 6, the solutions of (16) can be obtained asCombining Eqs. (10) and (44), we get(44)(45)OR(46)Suppose that Eq. (16) has solutions in the form ofSubstituting Eq. (47) into Eq. (16) and collecting all terms with the same powers of sinh(ηξ)m and equating to zero all the coefficients of sinh(ηξ)m, the following algebraic equations are obtained:(47)After solving these algebraic equations, the following solutions are obtained:
IV. PHYSICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE REPORTED RESULTS
In this section, we have provided the 2D and 3D graphs to some of the acquired conclusions based on the appropriate values of the parameters. We also checked the wave behaviors of the KGZ equations by using extended rational sine–cosine and extended rational sinh–cosh methods. The soliton wave solutions are acquired by the offered methods and graphically determined into a diversity of distinguished physical structures, such as periodic, dark, and bright soliton functions. These functions have different physical significance.
In this text, Fig. 1 illustrates 2D and 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of the Eq. |ϕ1(x, t)| for the parametric values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.
The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (19) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
Figure 2 shows 2D and 3D bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.
The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (20) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
Figure 3 represents 2D and 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of the Eq. |ϕ4(x, t)| for the parametric values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics. Figure 4 also indicates 2D and 3D bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics that are similar in shape like Fig. 2.
The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bright periodic solution of Eq. (29) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the bell-shaped periodic solution of Eq. (30) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
Figure 5 shows 2D and 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. |ϕ7(x, t)| for the KGZ at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.
The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (39) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
Figure 6 also indicates 2D and 3D dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) at α = 3, k = 0.2, = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics that are similar in shape like Fig. 5.
The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (40) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
Figure 7 shows the cusp wave soliton solution that comes from Eq. (49) for the parametric values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics.
The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (49) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
Figure 8 also indicates 2D and 3D dark wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) at α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 for the 2D graphics that are similar in shape like Fig. 7.
The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
The 3D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, and θ = 1 in graphic (a) and 2D surfaces of the cusp wave soliton solution of Eq. (50) by considering the values α = 3, k = 0.2, ω = 1.5, β = 1, C = 2, θ = 1, and y = 0.001 in graphic (b).
V. CONCLUSION
In this paper, plentiful new soliton solutions for the KGZ equations were checked by extended rational sine–cosine (ERSC) and extended rational sinh–cosh methods. These methods are useful for finding soliton and singular periodic solutions of nonlinear PDEs and have been successfully applied to obtain some new soliton solutions to the KGZ equations to attain the purpose. First, we assume that KGZ equations have the answer as mentioned above. Then, by placing this answer in the KGZ equations, we arrive at a set of equations. Then, we find the coefficients of this system of equations using Maple or Mathematics software and then we find a new soliton wave solution by placing them in the KGZ equations. We note that comparatively with Refs. 18, 19, and 47, the received conclusions are more special. We expect that the gained one soliton solutions should be beneficial in solitary wave theory.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71601072), the Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province of China (Grant No. 20B110006), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (Grant No. NSFRF210314).
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.