Ilmenite structure is a good playground to explore magnetism in honeycomb lattices owing to the existence of an intriguing variety of magnetism in 3d transition metal compounds. Because of the absence of magnetic ions, ilmenite-type MgTiO3 is a promising candidate for d0 transparent insulators to reveal general features of TiO6 honeycomb layers. In this study, we found an optimum growth condition to synthesize ilmenite-type single-crystalline MgTiO3 thin films on Al2O3(0001) substrates by pulsed-laser deposition. By increasing oxygen pressure from roughly 10−6 to 10−1 Torr, we obtained (0001)-oriented MgTiO3 thin films with suppression of segregation of a Mg2TiO4 phase. On the triangular lattice of Al2O3, twin-domain formation is suppressed with decreasing deposition rate, resulting in the synthesis of single-crystalline MgTiO3 thin films. The bandgap of the MgTiO3 film was evaluated to be about 4.4 eV by optical absorption spectra, which implies d0 transparent insulator.

Ilmenite-type (IL-type) crystal structure is closely related to corundum-type and LiNbO3-type (LN-type) with chemical formula ABO3 (A and B are cations and O is oxygen).1–3 While all three structures are composed of layered honeycomb lattices, the combination of valences of A and B cations and whether inversion symmetry exists or not are different. Each structure is classified based on these differences. By considering the ionic radii of those cations, the Goldschmidt tolerance factor4 provides an empirical guide to predict stable crystal structures. Some materials are known to be stabilized as both IL-type and LN-type structures though the cation combination is identical; these two structures are controlled by growth methods, for example, using high-pressure synthesis1,2,5–8 or thin-film techniques.9,10 The IL-type structure is constructed by alternating stacking of honeycomb lattices composed of octahedral units AO6 and BO6 [Fig. 1(a), drawn by VESTA11]. As a famous example, ATiO3 (A = Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni) has been investigated for the rich physics of magnetism with a variety of intriguing magnetic orders of spins on the A sites.12–15 Recently, thin-film studies on ATiO3 are extended to magnetic devices,16 dielectric devices,17–19 photochemical reactions,20,21 and gas sensors.20,22 Interestingly, IL-type compounds with honeycomb structures of IrO6 octahedra such as MgIrO3 (Refs. 23 and 24) have attracted great attention for quantum magnetism in the relationship with Kitaev’s honeycomb model.25 Recently, to stabilize honeycomb lattices of IrO6 octahedra in thin films, a superlattice approach has been proposed.26 The two-dimensional features of the IL-type structure will open a great arena to investigate interactions among the honeycomb magnets of the 3d metals and the Kitaev candidates.

FIG. 1.

(a) A schematic picture of the crystal structure of IL-type ABO3, drawn by VESTA11 based on a crystal structure of MgTiO3 in ICSD58 (Collection Code 55285). The orange, azure, and red balls correspond to the cations of A, B, and oxygen O sites, respectively. (b) The ratio of the XRD intensities for the Miller indices 0003 and that for 0006 for IL-type MgTiO3 and ATiO3 (A = Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni). The factors were calculated with the XRD simulations for the Cu 1 radiation in ICSD58 (Collection Code 55285, 171579, 91642, 48107, and 171584). ZA is the atomic number of the A site element. (c)–(e) 2theta-omega scans of MgTiO3 films deposited at PO2 ∼ (c) 10−6 Torr, (d) 10−5 Torr, and (e) 10−2 Torr. The insets show the magnified data around 40°, showing MgTiO3 0006 peaks. The asterisks indicate diffraction peaks of the Al2O3 substrates. (f) and (g) The red lines show the omega scans of the MgTiO3 0003 peak for the identical MgTiO3 thin films in (d) and (e), respectively. The black line in (f) presents that of the film fabricated with 1.1 nm/kp at PO2 = 10−5 Torr.

FIG. 1.

(a) A schematic picture of the crystal structure of IL-type ABO3, drawn by VESTA11 based on a crystal structure of MgTiO3 in ICSD58 (Collection Code 55285). The orange, azure, and red balls correspond to the cations of A, B, and oxygen O sites, respectively. (b) The ratio of the XRD intensities for the Miller indices 0003 and that for 0006 for IL-type MgTiO3 and ATiO3 (A = Mn, Fe, Co, and Ni). The factors were calculated with the XRD simulations for the Cu 1 radiation in ICSD58 (Collection Code 55285, 171579, 91642, 48107, and 171584). ZA is the atomic number of the A site element. (c)–(e) 2theta-omega scans of MgTiO3 films deposited at PO2 ∼ (c) 10−6 Torr, (d) 10−5 Torr, and (e) 10−2 Torr. The insets show the magnified data around 40°, showing MgTiO3 0006 peaks. The asterisks indicate diffraction peaks of the Al2O3 substrates. (f) and (g) The red lines show the omega scans of the MgTiO3 0003 peak for the identical MgTiO3 thin films in (d) and (e), respectively. The black line in (f) presents that of the film fabricated with 1.1 nm/kp at PO2 = 10−5 Torr.

Close modal

MgTiO3 will be a useful IL-type material as a non-magnetic d0 insulator.12 Previous studies on MgTiO3 films have focused on the dielectric properties for low-loss optical applications. In these studies, samples were prepared by chemical vapor transport,27,28 sol–gel method,29–35 metalorganic solution deposition,36,37 sputtering,38–49 pulsed-laser deposition (PLD),50,51 and the other methods.52–54 The single-crystalline structure was obtained by annealing process in both sol–gel29 and sputtering43 methods, indicating IL-type MgTiO3 is thermodynamically stable under appropriate conditions. In addition, another stable phase of Mg2TiO4 was also detected in polycrystalline films.43 By applying PLD, oxygen pressure strongly affects the formation of IL-type thin film or other phases, relating to oxidation and lattice symmetry.10 At the surface of the corundum structure of Al2O3, the triangular lattice of oxygen inevitably provides two energetically degenerated configurations, leading to twin-domain formation.55–57 Suppression of the twin-formation is crucially important to improve crystalline quality. In this study, we optimized growth conditions of oxygen pressure and growth rate for MgTiO3 deposition, resulting in the synthesis of IL-type single-crystalline MgTiO3 thin films. The bandgap of the MgTiO3 film was evaluated to be about 4.4 eV from absorption spectra, indicating a transparent insulator.

MgTiO3 thin films were fabricated on Al2O3(0001) substrates by PLD at 875 °C in various conditions of oxygen pressure (PO2: 10−6 to 10−2 Torr). The surfaces of the substrates were miscut by 0.2° from the (0001) plane along the [1̄100] direction, which were annealed in a furnace at 900 °C for 2 h in 1 atm oxygen flow before installation into the vacuum chamber. Sintered MgO (99.9%) and TiO2 (99.99%) powders were pelletized by spark plasma sintering at 900 °C and 80 MPa to make a target for deposition. The target was ablated by a KrF excimer laser at a frequency of 2 Hz. The distance from the target to the substrate was fixed at 35 mm for all experiments. Crystal structures of the samples were characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD) with the Cu Kα1 radiation and transmission electron microscopy. Thicknesses of the films were estimated from Laue oscillations of XRD intensity at a low angle reflection or around MgTiO3 0003 diffraction peak. The thicknesses of the films were typically 40 ± 5 nm, unless otherwise noted. The deposition rate of the thin films, which is one of the crucial parameters dominating crystalline orientation of MgTiO3, was evaluated by dividing the thickness by the number of the supplied laser pulses. We regulated the laser intensity that was monitored at the outside of the PLD chamber to examine the deposition-rate dependences of the film growth. Since the precise evaluation of the energy density is difficult due to the restriction of the chamber configuration, the deposition rate is applied to a parameter for discussion of the film growth. Optical transmittance Tsample and reflectance Rsample of the samples against monochromatic visible light were measured using a spectrophotometer. The reflectance is a relative value that defines the reflectance of a reference aluminum mirror as 100%. Absorbance Asample was estimated from Tsample and Rsample using the formula Asample = −ln(Tsample + Rsample).

To optimize oxygen pressure, MgTiO3 thin films were deposited under supplying oxygen gas with a deposition rate of roughly 13–15 nm/1000 pulses (nm/kp). Here, XRD spectra are magnified in Figs. 1(c)1(e) presenting MgTiO3 and ideally forbidden Al2O3 0003 diffraction peaks around 20°, because, for MgTiO3, the intensity of diffraction peak at 0003 is much stronger than that at 0006 (simulated by ICSD58), in contrast to the well-investigated ATiO3 with 3d transition elements, as shown in Fig. 1(b). Since the magnitude relationship of the 0003 and 0006 is reversed across the criteria of the ratio =1 in Fig. 1(b), the 0003 diffraction peak is suitable to examine the crystalline quality for MgTiO3. As shown in Fig. 1(c), (111)-oriented Mg2TiO4 appears in a 2theta-omega scan of a sample fabricated with no supply of oxygen, where background pressure was around 10−6 Torr. Although MgTiO3 diffraction also appears in Fig. 1(c), the peak intensity of MgTiO3 0003 is rather weak compared to that of Mg2TiO4 111. With increasing PO2 up to 10−5 Torr [Fig. 1(d)], only a diffraction peak of MgTiO3 0003 appears with suppression of that of Mg2TiO4 111. Laue oscillations around the MgTiO3 0003 peak were clearly observed in Fig. 1(d), indicating the uniform thickness of the film. While the peak intensity of MgTiO3 0003 diffraction slightly becomes small as the pressure increases up to PO2 = 10−2 Torr [Fig. 1(e)], only MgTiO3 0003n peaks were detected for the samples deposited in between PO2 = 10−5 and 10−2 Torr. The insets in Figs. 1(c)1(e) present the 2theta-omega scans around MgTiO3 0006 diffraction peak. As discussed in Fig. 1(b), the intensity of MgTiO3 0006 is rather small, but Mg2TiO4 222 peak was observed only in the inset of Fig. 1(c). In view of the omega rocking curves shown as the red lines in Figs. 1(f) and 1(g) for the identical films in Figs. 1(d) and 1(e), respectively, the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) for the film grown at PO2 = 10−5 Torr is much narrower than that at 10−2 Torr. Under the wide range of PO2, (0001)-oriented single-phase thin films of IL-type MgTiO3 were obtained.

To examine the crystalline orientation of the MgTiO3 films, we measured azimuthal phi scans with in-plane rotation at MgTiO3 and Al2O3 104 diffraction peaks, as shown in Fig. 2(a). The diffraction of Al2O3 104 (bottom) presents three-fold symmetry, which is consistent with the corundum structure. In contrast, the diffraction of MgTiO3 104 for the film deposited with a relatively high growth rate of 5.5 nm/kp (top) shows six peaks originating from the formation of twin domains. Here, we define A-domain (red-closed triangle): MgTiO3[112̄0](0001) || Al2O3[112̄0](0001) and B-domain (red open triangle): MgTiO3[1̄1̄20](0001) || Al2O3[112̄0](0001). The ratio of peak intensities for B- and A-domains IB/IA directly corresponds to an abundance ratio of these domains. The seven times as high-intensity IA as IB in the top panel of Fig. 2(a) implies that the total volume of the A-domain is roughly seven times than that of the B-domain. Considering in-plane lattice mismatch of about 6% between MgTiO3 and Al2O3, a parallel configuration such as A-domain is preferable. By reducing the deposition rate from 5.5 nm/kp (top) to 1.1 nm/kp [middle panel of Fig. 2(a)], IB is dramatically suppressed. IB/IA of the film is estimated to be smaller than 0.4%, resulting in the three-fold symmetry that is consistent with the symmetry of IL-type single-crystal. Considering the surface atomic arrangement, twin-domain formation is usually observed in the (111)-oriented thin films for zinc-blende and rock-salt structures.59–61 By contrast, the formation of the twin-domain is suppressed in corundum and IL-type structures.10,26,55,56,62,63 The arrangement of octahedral blocks may dominate the interface formation in contrast to the usual concept that oxygen arrangement at the terminated surface dominates the interface formation. In addition to the previous literature that PO2 affects the in-plane orientation of the film,10 the deposition rate also plays a crucial role in the arrangement of crystalline orientation.

FIG. 2.

(a) The azimuthal phi scans of 104 diffractions for MgTiO3 films fabricated with different deposition rates (top) 5.5 nm/kp, (middle) 1.1 nm/kp, and (bottom) Al2O3 substrate. The red solid and open triangles indicate diffraction peaks from A- and B-domains, respectively. (b) Growth phase diagram as functions of oxygen pressure and deposition rate. The positions of the red circles correspond to the growth condition under PO2 and with deposition rate. The areas of the circles indicate peak intensities of MgTiO3 0003 diffraction; the intensity is normalized by the thickness of the film and the incident x-ray intensity. The blue squares are the ratios of the peak intensities of B- and A-domains IB/IA of the MgTiO3 films deposited at PO2 = 10−5 Torr as a function of deposition rates; the ratio IB/IA is calculated from the intensity averaged of the three equivalent diffractive peaks in the phi scans as shown in (a) and (b).

FIG. 2.

(a) The azimuthal phi scans of 104 diffractions for MgTiO3 films fabricated with different deposition rates (top) 5.5 nm/kp, (middle) 1.1 nm/kp, and (bottom) Al2O3 substrate. The red solid and open triangles indicate diffraction peaks from A- and B-domains, respectively. (b) Growth phase diagram as functions of oxygen pressure and deposition rate. The positions of the red circles correspond to the growth condition under PO2 and with deposition rate. The areas of the circles indicate peak intensities of MgTiO3 0003 diffraction; the intensity is normalized by the thickness of the film and the incident x-ray intensity. The blue squares are the ratios of the peak intensities of B- and A-domains IB/IA of the MgTiO3 films deposited at PO2 = 10−5 Torr as a function of deposition rates; the ratio IB/IA is calculated from the intensity averaged of the three equivalent diffractive peaks in the phi scans as shown in (a) and (b).

Close modal

We summarize the XRD results as a growth phase diagram for IL-type MgTiO3 films with PO2 and deposition rate in Fig. 2(b). The area of the red circles reflects the intensity of the MgTiO3 0003 diffraction peak. We mainly examined two levels at PO2 = 10−5 and 10−2 Torr by applying different deposition rates. The circles at 10−5 Torr are clearly larger than those at 10−2 Torr, implying that low PO2 is enough to form IL-type MgTiO3. As discussed in Fig. 1(c), however, the impurity phase of Mg2TiO4 segregates at the lowest PO2 without an oxygen supply. Indeed, at both oxygen conditions, the size of the circles becomes larger as the deposition rate decreases, indicating improvement of the crystalline quality of the MgTiO3 films. In fact, the FWHM for the film fabricated with the rate 1.1 nm/kp at PO2 = 10−5 Torr is rather sharp with ∼0.09° [the black line in Fig. 1(f)]. In addition, IB/IA is overlaid in Fig. 2(b) with blue squares as a function of the deposition rate. Since IB/IA decreases with decreasing the deposition rate, the rate of roughly 1 nm/kp is enough low to suppress the B-domain volume below the detectable limit of the apparatus. Judging from these results, we concluded that PO2 = 10−5 Torr and relatively low deposition rate ∼1 nm/kp are an optimum growth condition for IL-type MgTiO3 thin films on Al2O3(0001) substrates.

XRD reciprocal space mapping was measured around the MgTiO3 0210 diffraction [Fig. 3(a)]. The measurement was performed on a 20-nm-thick film deposited with 1 nm/kp at 875 °C at PO2 = 10−5 Torr. The different in-plane lattice constant between the MgTiO3 film and the Al2O3 substrate indicates that the structure of the MgTiO3 film relaxes from that of the Al2O3 substrate. The lattice constants of the film are estimated to be a = 5.06 Å and c = 13.88 Å, being both in-plane and out-of-plane lattice constants comparable as bulk values of a = 5.056 69(4) Å and c = 13.9034(2) Å (ICSD:58 Collection Code 55285). All the films summarized in Fig. 2(b) except for the one with segregation of Mg2TiO4 show comparable c-axis lengths within the ±0.1% variation, which also indicates a small deviation of composition in the films. By applying transmission electron microscopy, the crystalline lattice at the interface was characterized along [112̄0] [Fig. 3(b)]. IL-type lattice arrangement of the MgTiO3 film is clearly observed on the Al2O3 substrate. The fast Fourier transformation of the image [Fig. 3(c)] shows the symmetry of the IL-type structure. The orientation relationship between MgTiO3 and Al2O3 for the region shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c) is determined as A-domain: MgTiO3[112̄0](0001) || Al2O3[112̄0](0001). It is noted that a small volume of the B-domain was partly observed in a different region of the identical sample though IB/IA for the sample was estimated to be smaller than 2%. To obtain a single-crystalline structure, the deposition rate should be carefully smaller than 1 nm/kp. The clean interface and high crystalline quality of MgTiO3 on Al2O3 are evidenced by these structural characterizations.

FIG. 3.

(a) XRD reciprocal space mapping around 0210 diffraction peaks of MgTiO3 and Al2O3. The horizontal (vertical) axis is the reciprocal vector corresponding to [010] ([001]). (b) Transmission electron microscope image around the interface between MgTiO3 and Al2O3. The scale bar in the image is 5 nm. (c) The fast Fourier transformation of (b). The labels around bright spots indicate the Miller indices for the spots: the light red (blue) colored labels for MgTiO3 (Al2O3).

FIG. 3.

(a) XRD reciprocal space mapping around 0210 diffraction peaks of MgTiO3 and Al2O3. The horizontal (vertical) axis is the reciprocal vector corresponding to [010] ([001]). (b) Transmission electron microscope image around the interface between MgTiO3 and Al2O3. The scale bar in the image is 5 nm. (c) The fast Fourier transformation of (b). The labels around bright spots indicate the Miller indices for the spots: the light red (blue) colored labels for MgTiO3 (Al2O3).

Close modal

Single-crystalline thin films are useful for the evaluation of bandgap by optical transmission spectroscopy. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) present the transmittance and reflectance of a 43-nm-thick MgTiO3 film on an Al2O3 substrate and another bare Al2O3 substrate, and the absorbance spectrum calculated from the data for the MgTiO3 film, respectively. The measured sample was deposited with 1.1 nm/kp at 875 °C and 10−5 Torr. As the reference of Al2O3 substrate, transmission Tsub (blue solid line) and reflection Rsub (blue dashed line) are almost constant for the overall wavelength region in Fig. 4(a), indicating no absorption of the substrate. The optical transmission of the MgTiO3 film Tfilm (red solid line) in Fig. 4(a) displays reduction at a shorter wavelength region than 300 nm. In the visible region (roughly 400–800 nm), the Tfilm is slightly lower than that of the Al2O3 substrate Tsub. The difference originates from the higher reflection Rfilm (red dashed line) than Rsub. By using these spectra Tfilm and Rfilm, the absorbance of the MgTiO3 film was calculated for estimation of the bandgap. Here, we plotted the absorbance and applied linear fitting [Fig. 4(b)] due to less information of the electronic band structure of MgTiO3 whether direct or indirect transition. The linear fitting on the absorbance spectrum between 4.6 and 4.8 eV reaches to an intercept at around 4.4 eV, which is defined as the bandgap of the MgTiO3 film in this study. This transition probably corresponds to the absorption from the O 2p to the unoccupied Ti 3d state, which is consistent with various Ti-oxide materials.21,64–67 The estimated value of the bandgap of MgTiO3 is roughly comparable to the values in the previous studies for films 4.11–4.19 eV (Ref. 45) with assuming indirect transition. Compared to other magnetic ATiO3 (A = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni), no signature of absorption at the visible region and the larger bandgap of 4.4 eV than the other ilmenites of ∼3.0 eV (Ref. 21) suppose the less intervalence charge transfer in MgTiO3. A relatively larger bandgap than rutile TiO2 of about 3.37 eV (Ref. 68) implies that layered stacking of MgO6 and TiO6 enlarges the bandgap. High optical transmission at the visible region and uniform thickness of MgTiO3 films fabricated by PLD is applicable to optical devices and to stacking with other IL-type oxides.

FIG. 4.

(a) Optical transmittance T (solid lines) and reflectance R (dashed lines) of a 43-nm-thick MgTiO3 film on an Al2O3 substrate (red Tfilm and Rfilm, respectively) and another Al2O3 substrate without film (blue Tsub and Rsub, respectively). (b) Red solid line is an absorbance of the MgTiO3 film estimated from Tfilm and Rfilm in (a). The black solid line indicates a linear fitting line in the range between 4.6 and 4.8 eV.

FIG. 4.

(a) Optical transmittance T (solid lines) and reflectance R (dashed lines) of a 43-nm-thick MgTiO3 film on an Al2O3 substrate (red Tfilm and Rfilm, respectively) and another Al2O3 substrate without film (blue Tsub and Rsub, respectively). (b) Red solid line is an absorbance of the MgTiO3 film estimated from Tfilm and Rfilm in (a). The black solid line indicates a linear fitting line in the range between 4.6 and 4.8 eV.

Close modal

We explored growth conditions for MgTiO3 thin films by pulsed-laser deposition. IL-type single-crystalline MgTiO3 thin films were obtained at an optimum condition at PO2 = 10−5 Torr and 875 °C with a low deposition rate of roughly 1 nm/kp. Deposition rate plays a crucial role in the suppression of twin-domain formation. An abrupt interface was observed, indicating honeycomb layered structure is well aligned as IL-type stacking. The bandgap is large enough to be a transparent window and an insulator without impurity states in the visible region. These results support that MgTiO3 films are applicable to optical devices and heterostructures with magnetic oxides.

The authors thank K. Harata and S. Ito for their experimental support on spark plasma sintering and transmission electron microscope, respectively. The authors thank K. Miura for stimulating discussion. This work was partly supported by CREST (Grant No. JPMJCR18T2), JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 19H02423), and the Grant Fund for Research and Education of the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University. The spark plasma sintering process was performed under the GIMRT Program of the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University (Grant No. 202012-CRKEQ-0410).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
J.
Ko
and
C. T.
Prewitt
,
Phys. Chem. Miner.
15
,
355
362
(
1988
).
2.
J.
Ko
,
N. E.
Brown
,
A.
Navrotsky
,
C. T.
Prewitt
, and
T.
Gasparik
,
Phys. Chem. Miner.
16
,
727
733
(
1989
).
3.
A.
Navrotsky
,
Chem. Mater.
10
(
10
),
2787
2793
(
1998
).
4.
V. M.
Goldscmidt
,
Naturwissenschaften
14
,
477
485
(
1926
).
5.
A.
Mehta
,
K.
Leinenweber
,
A.
Navrosky
, and
M.
Akaogi
,
Phys. Chem. Miner.
21
,
207
212
(
1994
).
6.
Y.
Inaguma
,
M.
Yoshida
,
T.
Tsuchiya
,
A.
Aimi
,
K.
Tanaka
,
T.
Katsumata
, and
D.
Mori
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
215
,
012131
(
2010
).
7.
A.
Aimi
,
T.
Katsumata
,
D.
Mori
,
D.
Fu
,
M.
Itoh
,
T.
Kyômen
,
K.
Hiraki
,
T.
Takahashi
, and
Y.
Inaguma
,
Inorg. Chem.
50
(
13
),
6392
6398
(
2011
).
8.
Y.
Inaguma
,
A.
Aimi
,
Y.
Shirako
,
D.
Sakurai
,
D.
Mori
,
H.
Kojitani
,
M.
Akaogi
, and
M.
Nakayama
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
136
(
7
),
2748
2756
(
2014
).
9.
T.
Varga
,
T. C.
Droubay
,
L.
Kovarik
,
M. I.
Nandasiri
,
V.
Shutthanandan
,
D.
Hu
,
B.
Kim
,
S.
Jeon
,
S.
Hong
,
Y.
Li
, and
S. A.
Chambers
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
26
),
21879
21890
(
2017
).
10.
K.
Miura
,
K.
Fujiwara
, and
A.
Tsukazaki
,
AIP Adv.
9
,
035210
(
2019
).
11.
F.
Izumi
and
K.
Momma
,
Solid State Phenom.
130
,
15
20
(
2007
).
12.
Y.
Ishikawa
and
S.
Akimoto
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
13
(
11
),
1298
1310
(
1958
).
13.
G.
Shirane
,
S. J.
Pickart
, and
Y.
Ishikawa
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
14
(
10
),
1352
1360
(
1959
).
14.
H.
Kato
,
Y.
Yamaguchi
,
M.
Yamada
,
S.
Funahashi
,
Y.
Nakagawa
, and
H.
Takei
,
J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.
19
,
6993
(
1986
).
15.
R. E.
Newnham
,
J. H.
Fang
, and
R. P.
Santoro
,
Acta Crystallogr.
17
(
3
),
240
242
(
1964
).
16.
K.
Miura
,
K.
Fujiwara
,
J.
Shiogai
,
T.
Nojima
, and
A.
Tsukazaki
,
J. Appl. Phys.
127
,
103903
(
2020
).
17.
T. M.
Pan
,
T. F.
Lei
,
T. S.
Chao
,
K. L.
Chang
, and
K. C.
Hsieh
,
Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.
3
,
433
(
2000
).
18.
T. M.
Pan
,
T. F.
Lei
, and
T. S.
Chao
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
78
,
1439
(
2001
).
19.
T. M.
Pan
,
T. F.
Lei
, and
T. S.
Chao
,
J. Appl. Phys.
89
,
3447
(
2001
).
20.
B. C.
Yadav
,
R. C.
Yadav
,
S.
Singh
,
P. K.
Dwivedi
,
H.
Ryu
, and
S.
Kang
,
Opt. Laser Technol.
49
,
68
74
(
2013
).
21.
K.
Yoshimatsu
,
H.
Mashiko
,
N.
Umezawa
,
K.
Horiba
,
H.
Kumigashira
, and
A.
Ohtomo
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
121
(
34
),
18717
18724
(
2017
).
22.
J.
Wang
,
C.
Wang
,
A.
Liu
,
R.
You
,
F.
Liu
,
S.
Li
,
L.
Zhao
,
R.
Jin
,
J.
He
,
Z.
Yang
,
P.
Sun
,
X.
Yan
, and
G.
Lu
,
Sens. Actuators, B
287
,
185
190
(
2019
).
23.
Y.
Haraguchi
,
C.
Michioka
,
A.
Matsuo
,
K.
Kindo
,
H.
Ueda
, and
K.
Yoshimura
,
Phys. Rev. Mater.
2
,
054411
(
2018
).
24.
S.-H.
Jang
and
Y.
Motome
,
Phys. Rev. Mater.
5
,
104409
(
2021
).
25.
26.
K.
Miura
,
K.
Fujiwara
,
K.
Nakayama
,
R.
Ishikawa
,
N.
Shibata
, and
A.
Tsukazaki
,
Commun. Mater.
1
,
55
(
2020
).
27.
J.
Zeng
,
H.
Wang
,
S.
Song
,
Q.
Zhang
,
J.
Cheng
,
S.
Shang
,
M.
Wang
,
Z.
Wang
, and
C.
Lin
,
J. Cryst. Growth
178
(
3
),
355
359
(
1997
).
28.
G.
Carta
,
R.
Gerbasi
,
G.
Rossetto
,
P.
Zanella
,
M.
Natali
,
M.
Bolzan
, and
O.
Saoncella
,
Surf. Coat. Technol.
201
(
22–23
),
9117
9119
(
2007
).
29.
J.
Lee
and
C. W.
Choi
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
38
,
3651
(
1999
).
30.
B. D.
Lee
,
K. H.
Yoon
,
E. S.
Kim
, and
T. H.
Kim
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
42
,
6158
(
2003
).
31.
M.
Jain
,
S. B.
Majumder
,
Y.
Yuzyuk
,
R. S.
Katiyar
,
A. S.
Bhalla
,
F. A.
Miranda
, and
F. W.
Van Keuls
,
Ferroelectr., Lett. Sect.
30
,
99
107
(
2003
).
32.
K. P.
Surendran
,
A.
Wu
,
P. M.
Vilarinho
, and
V. M.
Ferreira
,
Chem. Mater.
20
(
13
),
4260
4267
(
2008
).
33.
K. P.
Surendran
,
A.
Wu
,
P. M.
Vilarinho
, and
V. M.
Ferreira
,
J. Appl. Phys.
107
,
114112
(
2010
).
34.
M. A.
Reis
,
L. C.
Alves
,
N. P.
Barradas
,
P. C.
Chaves
,
B.
Nunes
,
A.
Taborda
,
K. P.
Surendran
,
A.
Wu
,
P. M.
Vilarinho
, and
E.
Alves
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B
268
(
11–12
),
1980
1985
(
2010
).
35.
Y.
Bian
and
J.
Zhai
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
75
(
6
),
759
764
(
2014
).
36.
Y. H.
Choi
and
J.
Lee
,
Thin Solid Films
385
(
1–2
),
43
47
(
2001
).
37.
B. D.
Lee
,
H. R.
Lee
,
K. H.
Yoon
, and
D. H.
Kang
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
88
(
5
),
1197
1200
(
2005
).
38.
C.-L.
Huang
and
C.-L.
Pan
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
22
,
2440
(
2004
).
39.
Y.-B.
Chen
and
C.-L.
Huang
,
J. Cryst. Growth
282
(
3–4
),
482
489
(
2005
).
40.
C.-L.
Huang
and
Y.-B.
Chen
,
J. Cryst. Growth
285
(
4
),
586
594
(
2005
).
41.
C.-L.
Huang
and
Y.-B.
Chen
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
44
,
6736
(
2005
).
42.
Y.-B.
Chen
,
C.-L.
Huang
, and
S.-H.
Lin
,
J. Alloys Compd.
480
(
2
),
897
902
(
2009
).
43.
C.-Y.
Hsiao
,
C.-F.
Shih
,
C.-H.
Chien
, and
C.-L.
Huang
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
94
(
2
),
363
366
(
2011
).
44.
C.-Y.
Hsiao
,
C.-F.
Shih
,
C.-H.
Chien
, and
C.-L.
Huang
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
94
(
4
),
1005
1007
(
2011
).
45.
C.-L.
Huang
,
S.-Y.
Wang
,
Y.-B.
Chen
,
B.-J.
Li
, and
Y.-H.
Lin
,
Curr. Appl. Phys.
12
(
3
),
935
939
(
2012
).
46.
T.
Santhosh Kumar
,
R. K.
Bhuyan
, and
D.
Pamu
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
264
,
184
190
(
2013
).
47.
Y.-D.
Ho
and
C.-L.
Huang
,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
96
(
7
),
2065
2068
(
2013
).
48.
A.
Vinod
,
M. S.
Rathore
,
T. S.
Kumar
,
D.
Pamu
,
A. P.
Pathak
, and
N. S.
Rao
,
Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids
172
(
1–2
),
81
89
(
2017
).
49.
D.
Negi
,
R.
Shyam
, and
S. R.
Nelamarri
,
Mater. Lett.: X
11
,
100088
(
2021
).
50.
J.
Frantti
,
Y.
Fujioka
,
C.
Rouleau
,
A.
Steffen
,
A.
Puretzky
,
N.
Lavrik
,
I. N.
Ivanov
, and
H. M.
Meyer
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
123
(
32
),
19970
19978
(
2019
).
51.
T. M.
Mazzo
,
L. R.
Macario
,
L. F.
Gorup
,
V.
Bouquet
,
S.
Députier
,
S.
Ollivier
,
M.
Guilloux-Viry
,
A. R.
Albuquerque
,
J. R.
Sambrano
,
F. A.
La Porta
, and
E.
Longo
,
ACS Appl. Nano Mater.
2
(
5
),
2612
2620
(
2019
).
52.
A.
Lotnyk
,
S.
Senz
, and
D.
Hesse
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
111
,
6372
6379
(
2007
).
53.
E. A. V.
Ferri
,
T. M.
Mazzo
,
V. M.
Longo
,
E.
Moraes
,
P. S.
Pizani
,
M. S.
Li
,
J. W. M.
Espinosa
,
J. A.
Varela
, and
E.
Longo
,
J. Phys. Chem. C
116
(
29
),
15557
15567
(
2012
).
54.
I.
Apostol
,
A.
Mahajan
,
C. J. A.
Monty
, and
K.
Venkata Saravanan
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
358
,
641
646
(
2015
).
55.
T. A.
Derouin
,
C. D. E.
Lakeman
,
X. H.
Wu
,
J. S.
Speck
, and
F. F.
Lange
,
J. Mater. Res.
12
,
1391
1400
(
1997
).
56.
I.
Yamaguchi
,
T.
Manabe
,
T.
Kumagai
,
W.
Kondo
, and
S.
Mizuta
,
Thin Solid Films
366
(
1–2
),
294
301
(
2000
).
57.
T.
Harada
,
P.
Bredol
,
H.
Inoue
,
S.
Ito
,
J.
Mannhart
, and
A.
Tsukazaki
,
Phys. Rev. B
103
,
045123
(
2021
).
58.
Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (version 4.7.0), http://icsd.fiz-karlsruhe.de, FIZ Karlsruhe; accessed on 25 October 2021;
A.
Belsky
,
M.
Hellenbrandt
,
V. L.
Karen
, and
P.
Luksch
,
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci.
58
,
364
369
(
2002
);
D.
Zagorac
,
H.
Müller
,
S.
Ruehl
,
J.
Zagorac
, and
S.
Rehme
,
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
52
,
918
925
(
2019
).
[PubMed]
59.
J. E.
Hails
,
G. J.
Russell
,
A. W.
Brinkman
, and
J.
Woods
,
J. Appl. Phys.
60
,
2624
(
1986
).
60.
K.
Maruyama
,
M.
Yoshikawa
, and
H.
Takigawa
,
J. Cryst. Growth
93
(
1–4
),
761
765
(
1988
).
61.
W. I.
Park
,
D.-H.
Kim
,
G.-C.
Yi
, and
C.
Kim
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
41
,
6919
(
2002
).
62.
I.
Yamaguchi
,
T.
Manabe
,
T.
Kumagai
,
W.
Kondo
, and
S.
Mizuta
,
Thin Solid Films
365
(
1
),
36
42
(
2000
).
63.
Y.
Gao
,
H.
Leiste
,
M.
Stueber
, and
S.
Ulrich
,
J. Cryst. Growth
457
,
158
163
(
2017
).
64.
65.
Y.
Deng
,
Y. L.
Du
,
M. S.
Zhang
,
J. H.
Han
, and
Z.
Yin
,
Solid State Commun.
135
(
4
),
221
225
(
2005
).
66.
D. C.
Cronemeyer
,
Phys. Rev.
87
,
876
(
1952
).
67.
M. H.
Suhail
,
G. M.
Rao
, and
S.
Mohan
,
J. Appl. Phys.
71
,
1421
(
1992
).
68.
S.
Tanemura
,
L.
Miao
,
P.
Jin
,
K.
Kaneko
,
A.
Terai
, and
N.
Nabatova-Gabain
,
Appl. Surf. Sci.
212–213
(
15
),
654
660
(
2003
).