Each solar tower power plant is designed for a pre-calculated optimal flux density distribution on the receiver. Any deviation from it has a direct impact on the component durability, energy efficiency and all downstream processes. An accurate knowledge of the current and predicted flux density is therefore essential. However, the existing measurements to obtain the flux density are either inaccurate, complicated or expensive. Moreover, to predict upcoming flux density maps, simulations are indispensable. Also, because there is still no cost-efficient way to measure heliostat surfaces on an industrial scale, these simulations neglect the individual surface errors of each heliostat and are therefore too inaccurate for a reliable prediction. We present a novel method based on artificial intelligence (AI) to include real heliostat surface errors into the flux density simulation, only by measuring the heliostats focal spot. The method needs only data generated by the already well-established camera-target heliostat calibration. Using the AI method as a supplement to this calibration, within this measurement, it is possible to simultaneously detect both main heliostat errors, the surface deformations and the misalignment. In this work, different neural network (NN) architectures are trained with artificially generated data and studied for their applicability to the described methodology. The network types used are conditioned and unconditioned generative adversarial networks (GANs) as well as neural radiance fields (NeRFs). The latter archives at best a Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) of up to 27.8. Afterwards the network results are compared qualitatively in terms of image quality, controllability and dataset size.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
6 October 2023
SolarPACES: SOLAR POWER & CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS: 27th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems
27 September–1 October 2021
Online
Research Article|
October 06 2023
Towards a neural network based flux density prediction – Using generative models to enhance CSP raytracing
Max Pargmann;
Max Pargmann
a)
1
Institute of Solar Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR)
, Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne (Germany
)a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Maldonado Quinto;
Daniel Maldonado Quinto
1
Institute of Solar Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR)
, Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne (Germany
)
Search for other works by this author on:
Stefan Kesselheim;
Stefan Kesselheim
2
Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ)
, Wilhelm-Johnen Straße, 52428 Jülich (Germany)
Search for other works by this author on:
Jan Ebert;
Jan Ebert
2
Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ)
, Wilhelm-Johnen Straße, 52428 Jülich (Germany)
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Pitz-Paal
Robert Pitz-Paal
1
Institute of Solar Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR)
, Linder Hoehe, 51147 Cologne (Germany
)
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
AIP Conf. Proc. 2815, 030015 (2023)
Citation
Max Pargmann, Daniel Maldonado Quinto, Stefan Kesselheim, Jan Ebert, Robert Pitz-Paal; Towards a neural network based flux density prediction – Using generative models to enhance CSP raytracing. AIP Conf. Proc. 6 October 2023; 2815 (1): 030015. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148765
Download citation file:
89
Views
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Students’ mathematical conceptual understanding: What happens to proficient students?
Dian Putri Novita Ningrum, Budi Usodo, et al.
Related Content
How can deep learning be used to improve the heliostat field calibration, even with small data sets? - A transfer learning comparison study
AIP Conference Proceedings (May 2022)
Etendue-matched solar tower beam-down system for high-temperature industrial processes
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2022)
Shadowing and blocking factors in heliostats: Comparison between parallel and oblique projections
AIP Conference Proceedings (May 2022)
Improved efficiency prediction of a molten salt receiver based on dynamic cloud passage simulation
AIP Conf. Proc. (July 2019)
Validation of a lighter and faster optical simulation model for performance calculations of solar central receiver plants
AIP Conf. Proc. (October 2023)