Concentrating solar power (CSP) plants, thanks to the implementation of cost-competitive thermal energy storage, represent a dispatchable zero-emission alternative to traditional fossil fuel power plants. Next generation solar towers are expected to adopt high temperature receivers (>700°C) coupled to sCO2-based power blocks, which optimal design is generally pushed towards the maximum cycle efficiency, often neglecting the economic impact with the justification that the main share of the capital cost is represented by the heliostat field. As result, the scientific literature lacks in comprehensive studies on techno-economic evaluation of CSP+sCO2 power plants addressing the important correlation that exists between system cost and performances. This work provides a preliminary techno-economic analysis of a solar power tower comparing four different cycle configurations for the sCO2 power block. Results have been reported on a Pareto front, highlighting the tradeoff between the plant investment cost and the solar-to-electricity plant efficiency. The trends of the optimization variables and cycle results have been reported to give useful insights about proper assumptions for the sCO2 power block design. The recompressed cycle with intercooling resulted as the most promising configuration and it has been further analyzed through a comparison of different solutions on the Pareto front. The cost breakdown of the sCO2 power block has been reported to highlight which components have the greatest impact on the overall plant cost and how they vary along the optimal solutions front. Eventually, the optimization has been repeated introducing a correlation to compute the turbomachinery isentropic efficiencies, to investigate their effect on the techno- economic analysis.

1.
U.
Nations
, “
Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties.
2.
A.
Bartle
, “
Hydropower potential and development activities
,”
Energy Policy
, vol.
44
, no.
4
, p.
241
,
2003
.
3.
M.
Astolfi
,
G.
Guandalini
,
M.
Belloli
,
A.
Hirn
,
P.
Silva
, and
S.
Campanari
, “
Preliminary Design and Performance Assessment of an Underwater Compressed Air Energy Storage System for Wind Power Balancing
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
, vol.
142
, no.
9
, Aug.
2020
.
4.
G. L.
Guizzi
,
M.
Manno
,
L. M.
Tolomei
, and
R. M.
Vitali
, “
Thermodynamic analysis of a liquid air energy storage system
,”
Energy
, vol.
93
, pp.
1639
1647
,
2015
.
5.
IRENA
,
Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018.
2018
.
6.
IRENA,
The Power to Change: Solar and Wind Cost Reduction Potential to 2025
, no. June.
2016
.
7.
M.
Mehos
 et al., “
Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap
,”
Nrel/Tp-5500-67464
,
2017
.
8.
M.
Binotti
,
M.
Astolfi
,
S.
Campanari
,
G.
Manzolini
, and
P.
Silva
, “
Preliminary Assessment of sCO2 Power Cycles for Application to CSP Solar Tower Plants
,”
Energy Procedia
, vol.
105
, pp.
1116
1122
,
2017
.
9.
T.
Neises
and
C.
Turchi
, “
A comparison of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle configurations with an emphasis on CSP applications
,”
Energy Procedia
, vol.
49
, pp.
1187
1196
,
2014
.
10.
D.
Alfani
,
M.
Astolfi
,
M.
Binotti
,
P.
Silva
, and
E.
Macchi
, “
Off-design Performance of CSP Plant Based on Supercritical CO2 Cycles
,” in
SOLARPACES 2019: International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems
,
2019
, no.
i
.
11.
F.
Crespi
,
G.
Gavagnin
,
D.
Sánchez
, and
G. S.
Martínez
, “Analysis of the Thermodynamic Potential of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles: A Systematic Approach,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
, vol.
140
, no.
5
,
2018
.
12.
“sCO2-flex [Online]. available at: http://www.sCO2-flex.eu.”.
13.
T.
Neises
and
C.
Turchi
, “Supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle design and configuration optimization to minimize levelized cost of energy of molten salt power towers operating at 650 °C,”
Sol. Energy
, vol.
181
, no. November
2018
, pp.
27
36
,
2019
.
14.
M. D.
Carlson
,
B. M.
Middleton
, and
C. K.
Ho
, “
Techno-Economic Comparison of Solar-Driven sCO2 Brayton Cycles Using Component Cost Models Baselined With Vendor Data and Estimates
,” in
ASME 2017 11th International Conference on Energy Sustainability
,
2017
, pp.
1
5
.
15.
F.
Crespi
,
D.
Sánchez
,
G. S.
Martínez
,
T.
Sánchez-Lencero
, and
F.
Jiménez-Espadafor
, “Potential of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles to reduce the levelised cost of electricity of contemporary concentrated solar power plants,”
Appl. Sci.
, vol.
10
, no.
15
,
2020
.
16.
E. W.
Lemmon
,
M. L.
Huber
, and
M. O.
McLinden
, “
NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties (REFPROP), Version 9.0
,”
Phys. Chem. Prop. …
,
2010
.
17.
M. J.
Wagner
and
T.
Wendelin
, “
SolarPILOT: A power tower solar field layout and characterization tool
,”
Sol. Energy
,
2018
.
18.
S.
Polimeni
,
M.
Binotti
,
L.
Moretti
, and
G.
Manzolini
, “
Comparison of sodium and KCl-MgCl2 as heat transfer fluids in CSP solar tower with sCO2 power cycles
,”
Sol. Energy
, vol.
162
, no. September
2017
, pp.
510
524
,
2018
.
19.
M.
Binotti
,
M.
Astolfi
,
S.
Campanari
,
G.
Manzolini
, and
P.
Silva
, “
Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants
,”
Appl. Energy
, vol.
204
, pp.
1007
1017
,
2017
.
20.
G.
Manzolini
,
M.
Binotti
,
D.
Bonalumi
,
C.
Invernizzi
, and
P.
Iora
, “
CO2 mixtures as innovative working fluid in power cycles applied to solar plants. Techno-economic assessment
,”
Sol. Energy
, vol.
181
, no. December
2018
, pp.
530
544
,
2019
.
21.
C. K.
Ho
,
M.
Carlson
,
P.
Garg
, and
P.
Kumar
, “
Technoeconomic Analysis of Alternative Solarized s-CO2 Brayton Cycle Configurations
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans. ASME
, vol.
138
, no.
5
,
2016
.
22.
A.
Romei
,
P.
Gaetani
,
A.
Giostri
, and
G.
Persico
, “
The role of turbomachinery performance in the optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide power systems
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2019 Turbomach. Tech. Conf. Expo.
, pp.
1
14
,
2019
.
23.
N. T.
Weiland
,
B. W.
Lance
, and
S. R.
Pidaparti
, “
sCO2 power cycle component cost correlations from DOE data spanning multiple scales and applications
,”
Proc. ASME Turbo Expo
, vol.
9
, pp.
1
17
,
2019
.
24.
NREL
, “
System Advisor Model (SAM
),”
Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.
,
2011
.
25.
M.
Jonemann
and
M.
Jonemann
, “
Advanced Thermal Storage System with Novel Molten Salt Advanced Thermal Storage System with Novel Molten Salt
,” no. May,
2013
.
26.
B.
Kelly
, “
ABENGOA SOLAR INC. - Advanced Thermal Storage for Central Receivers with Supercritical Coolants.
This content is only available via PDF.