Concentrating solar power (CSP) plants, thanks to the implementation of cost-competitive thermal energy storage, represent a dispatchable zero-emission alternative to traditional fossil fuel power plants. Next generation solar towers are expected to adopt high temperature receivers (>700°C) coupled to sCO2-based power blocks, which optimal design is generally pushed towards the maximum cycle efficiency, often neglecting the economic impact with the justification that the main share of the capital cost is represented by the heliostat field. As result, the scientific literature lacks in comprehensive studies on techno-economic evaluation of CSP+sCO2 power plants addressing the important correlation that exists between system cost and performances. This work provides a preliminary techno-economic analysis of a solar power tower comparing four different cycle configurations for the sCO2 power block. Results have been reported on a Pareto front, highlighting the tradeoff between the plant investment cost and the solar-to-electricity plant efficiency. The trends of the optimization variables and cycle results have been reported to give useful insights about proper assumptions for the sCO2 power block design. The recompressed cycle with intercooling resulted as the most promising configuration and it has been further analyzed through a comparison of different solutions on the Pareto front. The cost breakdown of the sCO2 power block has been reported to highlight which components have the greatest impact on the overall plant cost and how they vary along the optimal solutions front. Eventually, the optimization has been repeated introducing a correlation to compute the turbomachinery isentropic efficiencies, to investigate their effect on the techno- economic analysis.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
12 May 2022
SOLARPACES 2020: 26th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems
28 September–2 October 2020
Freiburg, Germany
Research Article|
May 12 2022
Techno-economic analysis of CSP incorporating sCO2 brayton power cycles: Trade-off between cost and performance Free
Dario Alfani;
Dario Alfani
a)
1
Group of Energy Conversion Systems (GECOS), Politecnico di Milano
, Milano, Italy
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Ty Neises;
Ty Neises
2
Thermal Energy Science & Technologies Group, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, CO, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Marco Astolfi;
Marco Astolfi
1
Group of Energy Conversion Systems (GECOS), Politecnico di Milano
, Milano, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Marco Binotti;
Marco Binotti
1
Group of Energy Conversion Systems (GECOS), Politecnico di Milano
, Milano, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Paolo Silva
Paolo Silva
1
Group of Energy Conversion Systems (GECOS), Politecnico di Milano
, Milano, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Dario Alfani
1,a)
Ty Neises
2
Marco Astolfi
1
Marco Binotti
1
Paolo Silva
1
1
Group of Energy Conversion Systems (GECOS), Politecnico di Milano
, Milano, Italy
2
Thermal Energy Science & Technologies Group, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, CO, USA
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
AIP Conf. Proc. 2445, 090001 (2022)
Citation
Dario Alfani, Ty Neises, Marco Astolfi, Marco Binotti, Paolo Silva; Techno-economic analysis of CSP incorporating sCO2 brayton power cycles: Trade-off between cost and performance. AIP Conf. Proc. 12 May 2022; 2445 (1): 090001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0086353
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
With synthetic data towards part recognition generalized beyond the training instances
Paul Koch, Marian Schlüter, et al.
Related Content
Comparing line-focusing and central tower solar power plants with s-CO2 binary mixture Brayton power cycles
AIP Conf. Proc. (December 2020)
Dry cooler contribution to LCOE in a sCO2 power cycle for CSP
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2022)
Performance evaluation of CSP power tower plants schemes using supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power block
AIP Conf. Proc. (July 2019)
Supercritical CO2 mixtures for Brayton power cycles complex configurations with concentrating solar power
AIP Conf. Proc. (May 2022)
Dynamic modeling of 5 MWe supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2018)