In the ongoing energy transition in India, ground mounted photovoltaic (GM-PV) plays a crucial role which becomes evident when looking at both governmental PV targets and recent developments. Despite cost-effectiveness speaking in favor of GM-PV, generally, a major drawback of GM-PV is the high land usage. One possibility to overcome conflicting interests of land use is agrivoltaics – a combined land-use for food and electricity production.

This paper summarizes the findings of a feasibility study on a 50 MWp agrivoltaic project in Maharashtra conducted by Fraunhofer ISE in 2018/2019 focusing on social impact and economic viability. The analyses indicate that an agrivoltaic system appears economically feasible with expected levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of INR 2.02 (EUR 0.0243) already including cost on water management, rainwater harvesting, water storage, and irrigation. Depending on the institutional arrangement between the farming community and the investor, the social impact is expected to vary from high benefits to risk of severe poverty among affected farmers.

Further findings indicate that the use of bifacial glass-glass PV modules raises electrical yield by 6.4% compared to mono facial modules. Regarding land use, the study suggests that the analyzed agrivoltaic system is likely to almost double average land use efficiency measured by the combined output of electricity and agriculture per unit of land (+94%).

1.
IRENA
,
Global Energy Transformation: The REmap transition pathway - A Roadmap to 2050
.
Background report to 2019 Edition
,
2019
.
2.
M. K.
Hairat
and
S.
Ghosh
, “
100 GW solar power in India by 2022 – A critical review
,”
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
73
,
1041
1050
(
2017
).
3.
S.
Schindele
,
M.
Trommsdorff
,
A.
Schlaak
,
T.
Obergfell
,
G.
Bopp
,
C.
Reise
,
C.
Braun
,
A.
Weselek
,
A.
Bauerle
,
P.
Högy
,
A.
Goetzberger
, and
E.
Weber
, “
Implementation of agrophotovoltaics: Techno-economic analysis of the price-performance ratio and its policy implications
,”
Applied Energy
265
,
114737
(
2020
).
4.
TERI
,
Assessing Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Strategies for Maharashtra: Maharashtra State Adaptation Action Plan on Climate Change (MSAAPC), <
http://www.moef.gov.in/sites/default/files/Maharashtra%20Climate%20Change%20Final%20Report.pdf>.
5.
TERI
,
Extreme Risks, Vulnerabilities and Community-based Adaptation in India (EVA). A Pilot Study. Governing Climate Extremes in Maharashtra, <
http://www.teriin.org/projects/eva/>.
6.
D.
Singh
, “
Effect of Low Light Intensity on Growth and Yield of Rainfed Cotton
,”
Indian Journal for Plant Physiology
(
1986
).
7.
A.M.R.
Abdel-Mawgoud
,
S. O.
El-Abd
,
S. M.
Singer
,
A. F.
Abou-Hadid
, and
T. C.
Hsiao
, “
Effect of shade on the growth and yield of tomato plants
,”
Acta Hortic.
(
434
),
313
320
(
1996
).
8.
V.
Hernández
,
P.
Hellín
,
J.
Fenoll
,
I.
Garrido
,
J.
Cava
, and
P.
Flores
, “
Impact of Shading on Tomato Yield and Quality Cultivated with Different N Doses Under High Temperature Climate
,”
Procedia Environmental Sciences
29
,
197
198
(
2015
).
9.
A. M. H.
de Avila
,
J. R. Boucas
Farias
,
H.
Silveira
, and
F.
Gustavo
, “Climatic Restrictions for Maximizing Soybean Yields,” in
A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research - Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen Relationships
, edited by
J.
Board
(
InTech
,
2013
).
10.
F. O.
Odeleye
,
A. O.
Togun
, and
T. O.
Tayo
, “
Effects of depodding and light intensity on soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill) in South West Nigeria
,”
Tropical Agriculral Research and Extension
7
(
2004
).
11.
A. J.
Zanon
,
N. A.
Streck
, and
P.
Grassini
, “
Climate and Management Factors Influence Soybean Yield Potential in a Subtropical Environment
,”
Agronomy Journal
108
(
4
),
1447
(
2016
).
12.
U.
Ghosh
,
N.
Sarkar
,
K.
Biswas
, and
Ranajit
, “
A review on performance evaluation of drip irrigation system in banana cultivation
,”
Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry
(
2018
).
13.
Y.
Israeli
,
Z.
Plaut
, and
A.
Schwartz
, “
Effect of shade on banana morphology, growth and production
,”
Scientia Horticulturae
62
(
1-2
),
45
56
(
1995
).
14.
D. D.
Pawar
,
S. K.
Dingre
, and
P. G.
Bhoi
, “
Productivity and Economics of Drip Irrigated Banana (Musa Spp.) under Different Planting and Fertigation Techniques in Sub Tropical India
,”
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
62
(
3
),
238
(
2017
).
15.
CGWB
,
Report On The Dynamic Ground Water Resources Of Maharashtra (2016-2017), <
http://cgwb.gov.in/Regions/GW-year-Books/GWYB-2015-16/GWYB%20CR%202015-16.pdf>.
16.
B.
Müller
,
L.
Hardt
,
A.
Armbruster
,
K.
Kiefer
, and
C.
Reise
, “
Yield predictions for photovoltaic power plants: empirical validation, recent advances and remaining uncertainties
,”
Prog Photovolt Res Appl
24
,
570
583
(
2016
).
17.
Fraunhofer ISE
,
Feasibility and Economic Viability of Horticulture Photovoltaics in Paras, Maharashtra, India
,
2019
.
18.
UERC
, |JPublic Notice Inviting comments on the Draft Order on Review of the Benchmark Capital Cost for Solar PV, <http://www.uerc.gov.in/Draft%20documents/2018/26%20Public%20Notice_on%20Benchmark%20Capital%20Cost.pdf>.
19.
M.
Trommsdorff
, “
An Economic Analysis of Agrophotovoltaics: Opportunities, Risks and Strategies towards a More Efficient Land Use
,”
Constitutional Economics Network Working Paper Series
(
2016
).
20.
R.
Mead
,
R. W.
Willey
, “
The Concept of a ‘Land Equivalent Ratio’ and Advantages in Yields from Intercropping
,”
Experimental Agriculture
16
,
217
228
(
1980
).
21.
C.
Dupraz
,
H.
Marrou
,
G.
Talbot
,
L.
Dufour
,
A.
Nogier
, and
Y.
Ferard
, “
Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes
,”
Renewable Energy
36
(
10
),
2725
2732
(
2011
).
This content is only available via PDF.