Purpose: To evaluate the viability of external beam methods in substitution or replacement of brachytherapy techniques, while maintaining similar dosimetric performance. Methods: Three original tandem and ring brachytherapy plans were re-planned using external beam techniques. A physician recreated the target volumes on CT scans without instruments present, and volumetric photon and intensity modulated proton plans were generated to deliver either a uniform dose or to emulate the brachytherapy distribution with the escalated dose core. Proton plans were additionally generated using several different planning parameters. Resultant plans were compared dosimetrically by evaluating the dose to 2 cm3 for critical organs, the dose coverage to 90% of the target volume, the low-dose normal tissue exposure at 20% and 50% of the prescription, and the target volume receiving 200% and 300% of the prescription for the escalated-dose plans. Results: External beam plans performed well, achieving comparable D90 coverage and critical structure dose to 2 cm3. Higher robustness distance settings increased the D100 for proton plans, along with increases to critical structure doses. Photon plans achieved good escalated dose patterns when emulating the brachytherapy distribution, with better result for the 200% volume than the 300% volume. Photon plans did not meet the 300% coverage in any plans. Escalated proton plans did not meet the brachytherapy dose volumes in any plan, and doses along the entry paths rose to over 150% of the prescription. Conclusion: Brachytherapy is still the preferred method for delivery of the local boost for cervical cancer, despite continued advancement of external beam technologies. Brachytherapy is able to achieve the highest target dose heterogeneity while still protecting organs at risk. External beam photon plans are superior to proton plans when attempting to emulate the brachytherapy dose heterogeneity.

1.
Dale
RG
,
Coles
IP
,
Deehan
C.
,
O'Donoghue
JA
.
Calculation of integrated biological response in brachytherapy
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
1997
;
38
(
3
):
633
642
.
2.
Niemierko
A.
Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose [published online ahead of print 1997/01/01]
.
Medical physics.
1997
;
24
(
1
):
103
110
.
3.
Dale
R.
,
Coles
P.
22 Allowance for the radiobiological effects of dose gradients in gynaecological applications
.
Radiotherapy and Oncology.
2001
;
60
:
S7
.
4.
Gill
BS
,
Lin
JF
,
Krivak
TC
, et al. 
National Cancer Data Base Analysis of Radiation Therapy Consolidation Modality for Cervical Cancer: The Impact of New Technological Advancements
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
2014
;
90
(
5
):
1083
1090
.
5.
Logsdon
MD
,
Eifel
PJ
.
Figo IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: an analysis of prognostic factors emphasizing the balance between external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
1999
;
43
(
4
):
763
775
.
6.
Han
K.
,
Milosevic
M.
,
Fyles
A.
,
Pintilie
M.
,
Viswanathan
AN
.
Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
2013
;
87
(
1
):
111
119
.
This content is only available via PDF.