An imaging method for the parallel in-situ measurement of heliostat aim points during operation in central receiver systems is assessed. In a SFERAII-access campaign, the HelioControl prototype system was integrated into the heliostat control system Hyperviseur at the Themis facility. The method, determining aim points from the cumulative flux distribution at the receiver, uses a signal of periodic movement, modulated by means of the heliostat drives. The functionality was implemented into a group of heliostats and practically assessed. For few heliostats, exemplary parallel aim point measurements at a flux target – using the methodology – show very small differences compared to a reference. Further experiments with multiple overlapping focal spots have been conducted using the small experimental cavity receiver of the system. The highly variable reflectance of the receiver area is challenging for the imaging method evaluating the reflection of the incident flux. A simplified receiver model obtained from experiments with single heliostats, however, allows for a correction and preliminary evaluation. The promising results obtained from measurements with deviations below 0.7 mrad in exemplary evaluations display the potential of the method and motivate for further and comprehensive validation in the context of commercial scale central receiver systems.

1.
M.
Berenguel
,
F. R.
Rubio
,
A.
Valverde
,
P. J.
Lara
,
M. R.
Arahal
,
E. F.
Camacho
, and
M.
Lopez
,
“An artificial vision-based control system for automatic heliostat positioning offset correction in a central receiver solar power plant
,”
Solar Energy
76
(
5
),
563
575
(
2004
).
2.
C.
Iriarte-Cornejo
,
C. A.
Arancibia-Bulnes
,
J.
Waissman
,
R. E.
Cabanillas
, and
C.A.
Estrada
,
“Dynamic Drift Compensation for Heliostats
,”
Energy Procedia
49
,
2109
2117
(
2014
).
3.
M.
Escobar-Toledo
,
C. A.
Arancibia-Bulnes
,
C.
Iriarte-Cornejo
,
J.
Waissman
,
D.
Riveros-Rosas
,
R. E.
Cabanillas
, and
C. A.
Estrada
,
“Heliostat image drift behavior for different error sources
,”
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy
6
(
2
),
23117
(
2014
).
4.
A.
Kribus
,
I.
Vishnevetsky
,
A.
Yogev
, and
T.
Rubinov
,
“Closed loop control of heliostats
,”
Energy
29
(
5-6
),
905
913
(
2004
).
5.
M. R.
Convery
, “Closed-loop control for power tower heliostats,” in
SPIE Solar Energy+Technology
, edited by
K.
VanSant
and
R. A.
Sherif
(
SPIE
,
2011
),
81080M
-
81080M
-8.
6.
P. J.
Harper
,
J.
Dreijer
,
K.
Malan
,
J.
Larmuth
, and
P.
Gauche
, “Use of MEMs and optical sensors for closed loop heliostat control,” in
AIP Conference Proceedings 1734
(
AIP Publishing
,
Melville, New York
,
2016
), p.
70015
.
7.
N.
Goldberg
,
G.
Kroyzer
,
R.
Hayut
,
J.
Schwarzbach
,
A.
Eitan
, and
S.
Pekarsky
,
“Embedding a Visual Range Camera in a Solar Receiver
,”
Energy Procedia
69
,
1877
1884
(
2015
).
8.
G.
Bern
,
P.
Schöttl
,
A.
Heimsath
, and
P.
Nitz
,
“Novel Imaging Closed Loop Control Strategy for Heliostats
,”
AIP Conference Proceedings
2017
(
1850
),
030005.1
-
030005.10
(
2017
).
9.
G.
Bern
,
P.
Schöttl
,
D. W.
van Rooyen
,
A.
Heimsath
, and
P.
Nitz
,
“Parallel in-situ measurement of heliostat aim points in central receiver systems by image processing methods
,”
Solar Energy
180
,
648
663
(
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.