Cylindrical steel tanks are very important structures in industrial facilities since their application is related to storing different types of products. Their safety and reliability have become a crucial issue because any damage may cause significant consequences, including ecological disaster. The most dangerous dynamic load acting on cylindrical steel tanks is related to earthquakes, especially that the seismic excitation may differ from place to place due to spatial seismic effects related to the propagation of seismic wave. Previous studies have confirmed that such non-uniform earthquake excitation may influence the response of large structures significantly. Stochastic methods of analysis have become an advantageous approach to simulate a spatiotemporal variation of ground motion field for the earthquake engineering problems. The aim of the present paper is to show the results of FEM numerical investigation focused on the response of a cylindrical steel tank under stochastically generated non-uniform earthquake excitation. The analysis has been conducted for the tank fully filled with petroleum. A method of conditional stochastic simulation of ground motions, using the spatiotemporal correlation function, has been applied to generate unknown acceleration time histories for different support locations, based on the earthquake record specified for one location. The results of the analysis clearly indicate that the consideration of spatial effects related to seismic wave propagation leads to the considerable changes in the response of cylindrical steel tank under earthquake excitation. It has also been shown that the application of the stochastic simulation with the spatiotemporal correlation function is an effective method which can be successfully used to generate earthquake records in different locations so as to consider the non-uniform ground motion excitation.

1.
Z.
Zembaty
,
A.
Cholewicki
,
R.
Jankowski
and
J.
Szulc
, „
Trzęsienia ziemi 21 września 2004 r. w Polsce północno-wschodniej oraz ich wpływ na obiekty budowlane
,”
Inżynieria i Budownictwo
61
, pp.
3
9
(
2005
).
2.
Z.
Zembaty
,
R.
Jankowski
,
A.
Cholewicki
and
J.
Szulc
, „
Trzęsienie ziemi 30 listopada 2004 r. na Podhalu oraz jego wpływ na obiekty budowlane
,”
Inżynieria i Budownictwo
61
, pp.
507
511
(
2005
).
3.
A.
Niwa
and
R. W.
Clough
, “
Buckling of cylindrical liquid-storage tanks under earthquake loading
,”
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
10
, pp.
107
122
(
1982
).
4.
G. C.
Manos
and
R. W.
Clough
, “
Tank damage during the May 1983 Coalinga earthquake
,”
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
13
(
4
), pp.
449
466
(
1985
).
5.
A.
Der Kiureghian
, “
A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions
,”
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
25
, pp.
99
111
(
1996
).
6.
Z.
Zembaty
and
A.
Rutenberg
, “
Spatial response spectra and site amplification effects
,”
Engineering Structures
24
, pp.
1485
1496
(
2002
).
7.
R. S.
Harichandran
,
A.
Hawwari
and
B. N.
Sweidan
, “
Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE)
122
(
5
), pp.
476
484
(
1996
).
8.
R. S.
Harichandran
and
E. H.
Vanmarcke
, “
Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time
,”
Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE)
112
(
2
), pp.
154
174
(
1986
).
9.
R.
Jankowski
and
K.
Wilde
, “
A simple method of conditional random field simulation of ground motions for long structures
,”
Engineering Structures
22
(
5
), pp.
552
561
(
2000
).
10.
D.-Y.
Zhang
,
X.
Li
,
W.-M.
Yan
,
W. Ch.
Xie
and
M. D.
Pandey
, “
Stochastic seismic analysis of a concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) arch bridge under tridirectional multiple excitations
,”
Engineering Structures
52
, pp.
355
371
(
2013
).
11.
G. W.
Housner
, “Earthquake Pressures on Fluid Containers,” Report No. 081-095 Eighth Technical Report under Office of Naval Research, Project Designation,
California Institute of Technology
,
Pasadena, CA, USA
,
1954
.
12.
G. W.
Housner
, “
Dynamic pressure on accelerated fluid containers
,”
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
47
(
1
), pp.
15
35
(
1957
).
13.
G. W.
Housner
, “
The dynamic behaviour of water tanks
,”
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
,
53
(
2
), pp.
381
387
(
1963
).
14.
R. S.
Wozniak
and
W. W.
Mitchell
, “Basis of Seismic Design Provisions for Welded Steel Oil Storage Tanks,”
Sessions on Advances in Storage Tank Design
,
American Petroleum Institute
,
Washington, USA
,
1978
.
15.
A. S.
Veletsos
, “
Seismic effects in flexible liquid storage tanks
”,
Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
,
Rome, Italy
,
1974
, pp.
630
639
.
16.
N. W.
Edwards
, “
A Procedure for the Analysis of the Dynamic of Thin-Walled Cylindrical Liquid Storage Tanks
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
,
1969
.
17.
M. A.
Haroun
and
G. W.
Housner
, “
Seismic design of liquid storage tanks
,”
Proceedings of the Journal of Technical Councils (ASCE)
107
, pp.
191
207
(
1981
).
18.
A. S.
Veletsos
, “Seismic response and design of liquid storage tank”,
Guidelines for Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipelines System
,
ASCE
,
New York, USA
,
1984
, pp.
255
370
.
19.
P. K.
Malhotra
,
T.
Wenk
and
M.
Wieland
, “
Simple procedure for seismic analysis of liquid storage tanks
,”
Structural Engineering
10
(
3
), pp.
197
201
(
2000
).
20.
A.
Bayraktar
,
B.
Sevim
,
A. C.
Altun
and
T.
Türker
, “
Effect of the model updating on the earthquake behavior of steel storage tanks
,”
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
66
, pp.
462
469
(
2010
).
21.
Z.
Ozdemir
,
M.
Souli
and
Y. M.
Fahjan
, “
Application of nonlinear fluid-structure interaction methods to seismic analysis of anchored and unanchored tanks
,”
Engineering Structures
32
, pp.
409
423
(
2010
).
22.
N.
Buratti
and
M.
Tavano
, “
Dynamic buckling and seismic fragility of anchored steel tanks by the added mass method
,”
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
43
, pp.
1
21
(
2014
).
23.
M. R.
Shekari
,
N.
Khaji
and
M. T.
Ahmadi
, “
On the seismic behavior of cylindrical base-isolated liquid storage tanks excited by long-period ground motions
,”
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
30
, pp.
968
980
(
2010
).
24.
A. A.
Seleemah
and
M.
El-Sharkawy
, “
Seismic analysis and modeling of isolated elevated liquid storage tanks
,”
Earthquakes and Structures
2
(
4
), pp.
397
412
(
2011
).
25.
H.
Moeindarbari
,
M.
Malekzadeh
and
T.
Taghikhany
, “
Probabilistic analysis of seismically isolated elevated liquid storage tank using multi-phase friction bearing
,”
Earthquakes and Structures
6
(
1
), pp.
111
125
(
2014
).
26.
A.
Shahrjerdi
and
M.
Bayat
, “
The effect of composite-elastomer isolation system on the seismic response of liquid-storage tanks: Part I
,”
Earthquakes and Structures
15
(
5
), pp.
513
528
(
2018
).
27.
D.
Burkacki
and
R.
Jankowski
, “
Experimental study on models of cylindrical steel tanks under mining tremors and moderate earthquakes
,”
Earthquakes and Structures
17
(
2
), pp.
175
-
189
(
2019
).
28.
J. C.
Virella
,
C. A.
Prato
and
L. A.
Godoy
, “
Linear and nonlinear 2D finite element analysis of sloshing modes and pressure in rectangular tanks subjected to horizontal harmonic motions
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
312
(
3
), pp.
442
460
(
2008
).
29.
ABAQUS
, Explicit version 6.11 User's Manual, Dassault Systèmes,
2011
.
30.
R.
Jankowski
, “
Non-linear FEM analysis of pounding-involved response of buildings under non-uniform earthquake excitation
,”
Engineering Structures
37
, pp.
99
105
(
2012
).
31.
R.
Jankowski
and
H.
Walukiewicz
, “
Modeling of two-dimensional random fields
,”
Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics
12
(
2
), pp.
115
-
121
(
1997
).
This content is only available via PDF.