The foam injection molding process provides a multitude of advantages both during production and throughout the life cycle of foamed components. Yet still there are many uncertainties concerning the conditions inside the cylinder during gas injection. For a better understanding of these processes, the solubility of gases in polymers is crucial. In current literature, almost exclusively static solubility is investigated. It is questionable whether results from static solubility measurements are relevant for highly dynamic processes like injection molding. Additionally, it is unknown whether the limits detected in static measurements also count for dynamic systems. In this work, a novel measurement method based on the bulk modulus of gas containing polymer melts, which provides in-line determination of dynamic solubility limits, was applied. Using a talc filled polypropylene in a MuCell®-process the question was whether the solvable amount of gas can be influenced and increased by a larger gas injection time to dosing time ratio (Rt=ti/td). Starting at a gas concentration that was initially beyond the solubility limit the ratio Rt was increased stepwise, while process pressure and gas content were kept constant. The bulk modulus method in combination with transmissive ultrasonic measurements proves that the dynamic solubility can be increased above 1.6 wt% nitrogen at 140 bar. In addition, compression work and injection work were monitored and compared to the respective states of solution. These findings show that the influence of material on solubility limits might only be relevant at long dosing and gas injection times as an equilibrium cannot develop in short times typical for injection molding. This approach is useful when large amounts of gas should be dissolved in the melt in order to achieve high density reductions. It opens new perspectives for injection foam molding.

1.
E.
Wintermantel
and
S.-W.
Ha
,
Medizintechnik: Life Science Engineering
,
Berlin Heidelberg
:
Springer Verlag
,
2009
, p.
613
.
2.
F.
Johannaber
and
W.
Michaeli
,
Handbuch Spritzgießen
,
Munich
:
Carl Hanser Verlag
,
2004
, p.
397
.
3.
V.
Altstädt
and
A.
Mantey
, „Historie des Schaumspritzgießen“ in
Thermoplast-Schaumspritzgießen
,
Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag
,
2011
, pp.
7
13
.
4.
J.
Xu
,
Microcellular Injection Molding
,
New Jersey
:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
2010
, p.
2
3
.
5.
S.-T.
Lee
, “History and Trends of Polymeric Foams: From Process/Product to Performance/Regulation” in
Polymeric Foams
, edited by
S.-T.
Lee
and
D.
Scholz
,
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2009
, pp.
1
40
.
6.
A.
Kramschuster
,
R.
Cavitt
,
D.
Ermer
,
Z.
Chen
and
L.-S.
Turng
,
Polymer Engineering and Science
45
, pp.
1408
1418
(
2005
).
7.
S.
Wong
,
J. W. S.
Lee
,
H. E.
Naguib
and
C. B.
Park
,
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
293
, pp.
605
613
(
2008
).
8.
K.
Hikita
,
JSAE Review
23
, pp.
239
244
(
2002
).
9.
Y.
Sato
,
T.
Takikawa
,
S.
Takishima
and
H.
Masuoka
,
Journal of Supercritical Fluids
19
, pp.
187
198
(
2001
).
10.
B.
Wong
,
Z.
Zhang
and
Y. P.
Handa
,
Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics
36
, pp.
2025
2032
(
1998
).
11.
S.
Takishima
,
K.
Nakamura
,
M.
Sasaki
and
H.
Masuoka
,
Journal of The Japan Petroleum Institute
33
, pp.
332
336
(
1990
).
12.
S.T.
Leexys
, „Introduction: Polymeric Foams, Mechanisms, and Materials“ in
Polymeric Foams: Mechanisms and Materials
, edited by
S.T.
Lee
and
N.S.
Ramesh
,
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2004
.
13.
L.
Chen
,
H.
Sheth
and
R.
Kim
,
Polymer Engineering and Science
41
, pp.
990
997
(
2001
).
14.
M.
Lee
,
C.
Tzoganakis
and
C.B.
Park
,
Polymer Engineering and Science
39
, pp.
99
109
(
1999
).
This content is only available via PDF.