Improving energy efficiency in every sector (e.g., building, industrial, transport) is a priority to reduce the effects of the human impact on the environment. Among the techniques which can be applied, waste heat recovery has received growing interest in the last few decades. Normally, waste heat can be utilized for power production or process heating. In the first case, recovery plants based on Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) are a common solution. Even though ORC systems are considered a consolidated technology, their application is not always economically convenient, especially for small- and medium-scale plants. This is due to the low temperature of the heat source made available to the ORC system, which inevitably implies a low thermodynamic cycle efficiency. Therefore, given a reference thermal source available for the ORC plant, particular attention has to be paid to the layout arrangement, in particular to the selection of some key components among which there is the expander. The paper deals with the comparative analysis of three small-scale plant layouts designed for the same reference waste heat source. In particular, three different expanders have been taken into consideration for electrical power production <100 kWe, i.e., 1) one-stage radial turbine, 2) twin-screw expander, and 3) two-stage radial turbine. Each expander imposes several constraints on the cycle and, consequently, the overall ORC plant performance is affected by the preliminary choice of such a machine. The three cases have been preliminarly designed and comparatively analyzed. Namely, they were compared from the view point of economic performance, to highlight potential trade-offs between improved thermodynamic efficiency and resulting costs. Moreover, a life cycle analysis completed the comparison by evaluating the overall environmental impact of the three cases in order to establish their benefits and drawbacks in terms of sustainable electricity production.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
17 December 2019
74TH ATI NATIONAL CONGRESS: Energy Conversion: Research, Innovation and Development for Industry and Territories
11–13 September 2019
Modena, Italy
Research Article|
December 17 2019
Comparison of mini Organic Rankine Cycle plants for waste heat recovery Free
Giuseppina Di Lorenzo;
Giuseppina Di Lorenzo
1
Department of Engineering - University of Roma Tre
, via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146 Rome, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Ambra Giovannelli;
Ambra Giovannelli
a)
1
Department of Engineering - University of Roma Tre
, via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146 Rome, Italy
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Pietro Bartocci;
Pietro Bartocci
2
Department of Engineering - University of Perugia
, via Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Francesco Fantozzi
Francesco Fantozzi
2
Department of Engineering - University of Perugia
, via Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Giuseppina Di Lorenzo
1
Ambra Giovannelli
1,a)
Pietro Bartocci
2
Francesco Fantozzi
2
1
Department of Engineering - University of Roma Tre
, via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Engineering - University of Perugia
, via Duranti 67, 06125 Perugia, Italy
a)Corresponding author: [email protected]
AIP Conf. Proc. 2191, 020066 (2019)
Citation
Giuseppina Di Lorenzo, Ambra Giovannelli, Pietro Bartocci, Francesco Fantozzi; Comparison of mini Organic Rankine Cycle plants for waste heat recovery. AIP Conf. Proc. 17 December 2019; 2191 (1): 020066. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138799
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Classification data mining with Laplacian Smoothing on Naïve Bayes method
Ananda P. Noto, Dewi R. S. Saputro
Related Content
Comparison of the environmental impacts of aquaponics and hydroponics using the LCA method in Bogor, Indonesia
AIP Conf. Proc. (February 2024)
High-temperature solar receiver integrated with a short-term storage system
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2017)
Life cycle greenhouse gas evaluation of organic rankine cycle using refuse-derived fuel from municipal solid waste
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (October 2017)
Optimization of automotive Rankine cycle waste heat recovery under various engine operating condition
AIP Conf. Proc. (February 2017)
The net power output of ideal supercritical organic Rankine cycle with different flow arrangement evaporators
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (May 2014)