Learning in the 21st century has encouraged the presence of technology in education. Physics is one of the subjects that require a practicum to deliver abstract material. However, in the current physics practicum, student worksheet is still being used, which does not support high-level thinking skills and technology is not yet integrated. This study aims to produce practical worksheet equipped with augmented reality (AR) in physics material class XII odd semester. This study uses Dick and Carey model of research and development method. The data of this study were obtained from the results of validation by experts in the material, media, and learning, as well as the results of trials by teachers and students conducted with a Likert scale questionnaire. A pretest and posttest are also conducted to test the improvement of students. The product produced is worksheet equipped with AR technology that can display videos at stimulus stages, procedures, and conceptual applications by scanning images bearing the AR logo with an android smartphone. The results of the worksheet feasibility test conducted by material experts received an average percentage of 93%, the feasibility test conducted by media experts obtained an average percentage of 90%, and the feasibility test conducted by learning experts received an average percentage of 81%. The results of user trials by teachers get an average percentage of 98%, user trials by students get an average of 90.1%, and the results of pretest and posttest get N-gain of 0.72. This study indicates that the Worksheet for Students to practice higher-order thinking skills has met the criteria very well based on the assessment in terms of material, media and learning and declared fit as Physics teaching materials in class material XII odd semester.

1.
BSNP
,
Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI, Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan, Jakarta
(
2010
).
2.
UCLES
,
Global Education Census Report, Cambridge Assessment International Education, Cambridge
(
2018
).
3.
J. W. M.
Lai
and
M.
Bower
,
Comput. Educ.
133
, pp.
27
42
(
2019
).
4.
P21, Framework for 21st Century Learning
, available at http://www.p21.org (
2015
).
5.
Noss
R.
Springer
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
, pp.
3
5
(
2012
).
6.
H. E.
Vidergor
,
M.
Givon
,
E.
Mendel
,
Think. Ski. Creat
31
, pp.
19
30
(
2018
).
7.
J. R.
Savery
, Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. in Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning.
Purdue University Press
,
West Lafayette
, pp.
5
15
(
2015
).
8.
E. M.
Janssen
,
Contemp. Educ. Psychol
(
2019
).
9.
E. M.
Janssen
,
Teach. Teach. Educ.
84
, pp.
139
149
(
2019
).
10.
A. W.
Gunawan
,
Genius Learning Strategi: Petunjuk Praktis untuk menerapkan accelerated learning
,
Gramedia Pustaka Utama
,
Jakarta
(
2012
).
11.
Ernawati
,
Pengembangan High Order Thinking (HOT) Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Mind Banking dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam
. in
1st International Conference on Islamic Civilization ans Society (ICICS
),
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, Surabaya
(
2017
).
12.
R. A.
Nugroho
,
HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill), Grasindo, Jakarta
(
2018
).
13.
R. M.
Majzub
,
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
102
, pp.
195
203
(
2013
).
14.
L. D.
Kantar
,
Nurse Educ. Today
34
, pp.
789
794
(
2013
).
15.
M. S.
Hayat
and
S.
Anggraeni
,
J. Penelit.
2
, pp.
141
152
(
2011
).
16.
P.
Suparno
,
Miskonsepsi & perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika, Grasindo, Jakarta
(
2005
).
17.
Supriyadi
.
Kurikulum Sains dalam Proses Pembelajaran Sains, Pustaka Tempel Sari, Yogyakarta
(
2007
).
18.
R. D.
Fannie
and R,
J. Sainmatika
8
, pp.
96
109
(
2014
).
19.
Rahayu
,
Radiasi
3
, pp.
78
82
(
2013
).
20.
W.
Fitriani
and
F.
Bakri
,
Wahana Pendidikan Fisika
2
(
1
), pp.
36
42
(
2017
).
21.
H.
Anis
and
A. M.
Yusuf
,
J. Penelit. Pengemb. Pendidik. Fis.
2
(
2
), pp.
23
30
(
2017
).
22.
J.
Ramos
,
Int. J. Innov. Interdiscip. Res.
, pp.
48
60
(
2013
).
23.
S.
Cai
,
X.
Wang
,
F. K.
Chiang
,
Comput. Human Behav
,
37
, pp.
31
40
(
2014
).
24.
D.
Nincarean
,
M. B.
Alia
,
N. D. A.
Halim
,
M. H. A.
Rahman
,
Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.
103
, pp.
657
664
(
2013
).
25.
A.
Ahmad
,
A. M.
Al-Ahmari
,
M. U.
Aslam
,
M. H.
Abidi
,
S.
Darmoul
,
IFAC-Papers on Line
28
, pp.
1726
1731
(
2015
).
26.
M. B.
Ibáñez
,
Á.
Di Serio
,
D.
Villarán
,
K C.
Delgado
,
Comput. Educ.
71
, pp.
1
13
(
2014
).
27.
A.
Rusilowati
,
J. Pendidik. Fis. Indones
4
, (
2007
).
28.
W. M.
Putri
,
F.
Bakri
,
A. H.
Permana
,
Pros. Semin. Nas. Fis. 2016, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
, pp.
83
88
(
2016
).
29.
F.
Bakri
,
D.
Ambarwulan
,
D.
Muliyati
,
J. Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Fis.
4
(
2
), pp.
46
56
(
2018
).
30.
A. H.
Permana
,
D.
Muliyati
,
F.
Bakri
,
B. P.
Dewi
,
D.
Ambarwulan
,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
1157
(
3
), pp
032027
(
2019
).
31.
Meredeith
and
G. Walter
Borg
,
Educational Reasearch
,
Pearson Education
,
Boston
(
2003
).
32.
W.
Dick
and
L.
Carey
,
The Systematic Design of Instruction
,
Pearson Education
,
New York
(
2015
).
33.
R. N.
Afifah
, “
Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Berbasis Metode Percobaan
,” Undergraduated Thesis,
Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta
,
2015
.
34.
P.
Abdullah
, “
Pengaruh Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Berbantuan Augmented Reality terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Konsep Fluida Statis
,” Undergraduated Thesis.
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
,
2016
.
This content is only available via PDF.